Will the Britain leave the ECHR?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
- Sign up to Brilliant (the first 200 sign ups get 20% off an annual premium subscription): brilliant.org/...
With the first flight to Rwanda being cancelled, we decided to take a look at the government's controversial Rwanda Policy. Why did it end up failing and what do they government hope to do with it in the future.
Follow TLDR on Facebook: / tldrnewsuk
Follow TLDR on Twitter: / tldrnewsuk
Follow TLDR on Instagram: / tldrnewsuk
Discord: tldrnews.co.uk...
SUBMIT YOUR VIDEO IDEAS: forms.gle/pPY3...
TLDR Store: tldrnews.co.uk...
TLDR TeeSpring Store: teespring.com/...
Support TLDR on Patreon: / tldrnews
Donate by PayPal: tldrnews.co.uk...
TLDR is all about getting you up to date with the news of today, without bias and without filter. We want to give you the information you need, so you can make your own decision.
TLDR is a super small company, run by a few people with the help of some amazing volunteers. We are primarily fan sourced with most of our funding coming from donations and ad revenue. No shady corporations, no one telling us what to say. We can't wait to grow further and help more people get informed. Help support us by subscribing, following and backing on Patreon. Thanks!
If you have to leave a Human Rights convention to get a policy through it might be time for a bit of a rethink.
this.
My grandpa didn't need no human rights while he was shooting down German bombers on his way to school!
Agreed. These brexiteers seem to forget they are human too ((in principle at least...) and therefore fall under its protection. I am reminded of that famous poem "First they came"
I agree. But the rethink might be not only is the convention screwed, but the whole structure of dealing with refugees doesn't work. It is all based on a reaction to the under-reaction to the Nazi's. Its more than 70 years later. Time to rethink the whole program.
You mean the same ECHR that ruled an Austrian woman did not have her freedom of expression breached for being convicted of insulting the prophet Muhammad? Yeah, I'll take what you're saying with a grain of salt.
8:40 ... "Grece temporarily after a military coup and Russia after invading Ukraine", what a company to be a part of.
I know right?
The UK set to be the biggest pariah state in Europe that uses the Latin alphabet.
Can't wait to see buses saying "We send Rwanda £120,000,000, let's spend that on our NHS instead!" in the future.
30k per assylum seeker on top. What the fuck
The real overwhelming immigration is not from these war torn countries but countries like india. Mix of dodgy student visas and work permits. Half a million every year .more than rest of world put together
Then it won't get spent on the NHS, just more cheese, wine and karaoke machines
@@temptemp4174 the sad thing is, these asylum seekers would work and pay taxes in the UK, earning the government money if tories wasn't so fucking racist.
@@boass Immigrants earn money for a country 😂 you have an aging population and need immigrants to keep the workforce young. They pay taxes and work.
Kicking immigrants out make ZERO economic sense
So... On the one hand they are using the Good Friday Agreement as a levering tool in unilaterally changing the Brexit agreement, and on the other hand wanting to do something that violates that same agreement? Way to go Boris!
in which way does it violate the Agreement?
@@dimitriyeremian1354 The GFA stipulates that the UK be subject to the ECHR
@@dimitriyeremian1354 Rewatch the video.🙄
To be fair, the EU has been using the GFA to pressure the UK and push their side since the beginning. Also remember that means that the EU is using the threat of Irish terrorism to push their point and pressure the UK, I don’t think it’s fair to be pointing fingers.
@@dimitriyeremian1354 8:49
What's happening with the other half of the deal? The undesired people who Rwanda will be sending to Britain in return?
I think they are going to Zambia
Yep don't hear that mentioned much
@@Mypromiselive what? The ones we promise to bring here as part of the deal ???
You mean all 3 of them?
Even their consideration to leave the ECHR means that it's now no longer hyperbole to label this current Tory Party as fascists.
You mean the same ECHR that ruled an Austrian woman did not have her freedom of expression breached for being convicted of insulting the prophet Muhammad? Yeah, I'll take what you're saying with a grain of salt.
Then facist is a good thing
@@strife2746 She was convicted by a national Vienna court not ECHR. ECHR has only jurisdiction to contradict national laws when they would infringe human rights. She tried to use article 10 of the ECHR convention. Article 10 of the Convention states: "Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This Article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises."
"The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary." This clearly lets national law maintain limits on what freedom of expression can contain and thus does not fall under the jurisdiction of the ECHR. I find it appalling that you try to throw an well established and well regarded institution as the ECHR under the bus without doing proper investigation in the case you are referring to. She was convicted under Austrian laws by an Austrian court. The ECHR has very little to do with it.
@@alexlehrersh9951 Your statement makes you sound like a self declared fascist based upon a misrepresentation of court case you have hardly investigated. I hope you will change your mind and maybe read the actual ruling before passing judgement.
@@christiaannooteboom4277 I adjusted my comment. It doesn't change a whole lot. Doing the conviction or justifying the conviction doesn't make them any less bad. And don't come to me with your "im so appalled" as if trying to push a sense of guilt on me. Not gonna happen. I misspoke, but the outcome isn't much different whether they do the convicting or tolerating it. It shows their stance on the issue, doesn't it?
It's failing because it's Johnson's policy,like every other joke policy he comes up with all gimmicks.
He’s available on telegram
# alexmarciofx
Honestly, EU asylum policy based on old international treaties (which the ECHR enforces) is also pretty much bankrupt. 60%+ rejected asylum claims. 19% of rejected asylum claimants actually leave the EU (according to EU supreme auditor). That's an enormous problem.
The EU pays the Libyan coastguard to keep people away. Frontex helped pushbacks in Greece. EC supports Poland pushing back migrants flown in from Belarus. It's a big mess and it needs an update. But as you can see, people will just shout "racists removing human rights" and they then continue to ignore the problem.
When the original treaties could only exist in a world that wasn't as globalized so people from poor countries didn't find it as easy to travel as it is now.
@@Seth9809 I think you're underestimating (or just completely ignoring) cultural distance and the barrier it can be to good integration. Cultural relativism doesn't work: it takes more effort to integrate someone from Somalia into a western country (and viceversa) than it does to integrate someone from Sweden into a western country. Level of education is another big predictor.
Not to mention the simple economic burden hosting many on average low-education people with large cultural distance. Compromise the welfare state too much and international solidarity breaks down. I see it in my country (the Netherlands) in the lower classes. They lack solidarity because social housing queues are increased as asylum recipients get to skip the queue. 12% of social housing is given to asylum recipients per year. That increases queues for low income Dutch people newly starting the queue to get social housing by 50%.
And then we're not even mentioning the return rate of rejected asylum seekers of 19%. That's terrible, it means the whole asylum distinction barely matters.
Especially with big diasporas which allow you to carry on your own culture in an enclave in the new country.
The stuff you mention was accompanied with a lot of violence and misery and not a peaceful model of integration that we strive towards today.
These refugees are fleeing the EU and coming to Britain. Tells us a lot about how crap the EU is!
Just to clarify: You cannot apply for asylum in the UK if you’re still in your home country.
You can only apply for normal migration that way, so it’s not just a case of “staying near danger” to fill out paperwork, they would also have their asylum denied if they hadn’t already fled.
What I'd like to know is a little bit trivial but all the same
What happens if the asylum seekers/refugees are seeking asylum from Rwanda? Are we just gonna send them back???
Part of the deal is to take in a certain number of refugees from Rwanda, I forget the number. Sometimes TLDR omits certain facts in favour of narrative it seems.
The government publicly omits that fact because it wouldn't be popular with a lot of people supportive of the policy
@@Cunnysmythe I wish TL;DR would include that part too. No media outlet seems to be talking about it but it seems pretty significant to me.
Its a comparatively trivial thing, but Jack looks better clean shaven, especially without the neck beard!
So let me get this straight, the UK is paying Rwanda 120 mil upfront and ~25k per asylum seeker they send off? You could pay for a 3 year university degree plus a modest cost of living grant for that amount per asylum seeker! So why is the UK paying money to send people away if they could pay the same amount of money and have a highly skilled worker at the end?
How about they stay in their own country and fight for their families and forefathers and make it better and not be cowards.
women and children. Yes.
fighting aged men. No.
@@matthewv4170 they’re civilians, with no military training, if they run in with no guns or weapons they will die, that’s just a truth
@@matthewv4170 many of them come to work because their current country has no employment opportunities for them, and ultimately they need to feed their families. I don't imagine many people will want to stay and fight if it means their wife and children starve.
@@bassetts1899 well set up a business then. That's not a refugee wanting a better job.
@@matthewv4170 In many cases they don't have a "country" to fight for.....
You're an 18 year old Syrian chap who has just started his first year at Damascus university when the mass protests against the President begin. This quickly spirals into a chaotic civil war with multiple militant groups with different agendas and international financers..... Any sense of normality has been obliterated, bombs are being dropped indiscriminately on large population centres, water and food are in short supply and people are leaving the country in their millions looking for refuge.... What do you do? Join a militia group? Join the army of the Government which has been killing protestors? How do you fight for your country in such a situation?
It's easy to sit there judging people from the comfort of your home in a safe and stable country....... but if chaos broke out tomorrow in which ever country you call home, normality removed overnight and social breakdown ensued, I doubt you'd practice what you preach.
Obviously the best policy, Putin leaves the ECHR, follow suit - genius
next we will invade the republic of ireland to re establish the union of the british isles
@@nevreiha Don't talk such nonsense, Britany is obviously the next best step
I hope not, it's one of the few things that protects the average uk citizen from complete serfdom.
While some uk citizens are purposely skipping meals cause inflation is to high… sure let’s spend money on this instead
@Prussianist Socialist or racism 🌚
Anyway counting pennies for refugees food is such a Tory thing.
@Prussianist Socialist Let me guess, the money we "save" after getting rid of the refugees will come back and build hospitals and re-fund the NHS?
Interesting how some consider refugees peoples expendable when cutting cost 💀
@Prussianist Socialist no, let's spend money on getting refugees to work for the economy instead of wasting billions on importing africans. Oh wait, what is it? You didn't know that according to the Rwanda deal Uk will be importing africans? Then why did you comment?
@Prussianist Socialist do you really think the british worker would be in any way affected? Bargaining power of the workers comes from their importance and unions. Most British workers have neither and that's exactly how the conservatives want it to be. “they did not have skills necessary to make great nations at home". Are you dumb or yes? Did you build the mighty British economy yourself? No? How unsurprising. “Their skills are not aligned with those of developed nations". Are you ot of touch or yes? They are capable of cleaning toilets and wiping floors, those are exactly the skills developed nations need. Developed nations also have developed educations systems that both migrants and their children can use to learn even better skills.
@Prussianist Socialist it's one sided sure, but the point still stands and your argument only works to such an extent temporarily since Rwanda is a developed nation in a see of chaos, so we can expect the numbers to rise quite soon.
Also: you're going to prevent illegal immigration by trowing out people that are already in the country? Think for a second and tell me how that will prevent anything except for tax payer money going into actually needed services.
If I ever need to know the top 100 stupid ideas, I think I will contact the British Government
Her Majesty's Government
Pretty sure you can ask for way more than 100 and they would provide
...my understanding is that the Geneva Convention is written in such a way, that its standards can be imposed upon Britain even if we withdraw from it. Thus the right to claim asylum would remain in tact regardless. The international community would need to punish Britain for doing it though i.e. diplomatic cpnsequences, if not sanctions.
Lawyer here. Although international subjects are normally only bound by customs, treaties, and principles publicly accepted by them by ratification / faithfull observation, there are some international norms, called "ius cogens" which every international subject has to obey by virtue of them being considered universal peremptory norms for all of humanity, such norms include the prohibition of torture and genocide, basic labor protections, the universal declaration of human rights, etc. Tho what is and isn't considered ius cogens is a point of contention, most scholars agree that the majority of the geneva convention are ius cogens norms.
@@july6949 ...hello, thank you for that comment. So would the right to claim asylum would remain in tact in the UK, if we pulled out of the ECHR? Is that correct?
Would it mean that how we interpret the right to claim asylum would become a little more debatable?
6:35
Holy shit fucking *EXPENSIVE*
When you’re government has to leave the EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS to pass a bill you know you have a BIG problem
No,you know you're not part of Europe . Get an education, you racist.
If this happens Winston Churchill will jump out of his grave and punch Boris in the face for ruining his legacy.
Governments picking and choosing what laws actually apply and what judicial bodies actually have power but if you dont behave they will lock you in a box for years.
Not exactly related, but 2 videos in one day👀
TLDR you can't "stay in your country of origin while you apply" the UN charter on refugees specifically states you have to be in another country in order to apply (Palestinians excepting) so that you can prove that you are at risk of persecution or in danger.
But why Rwanda...
They could have just done the Falklands or somewhere which is already in the United Kingdom.
Meaning they technically weren't being deported.
I love the Nebula ad. I think I first saw it on your last video, extremely cool and strange to see you on your own ad before your video. Really interesting as well, watched it all through!
120 million flat + say 1.000 people per year, that's 140.000.000... that's 140.000 GBP per head... I could pay off my mortgage 2 times + have some 10k to spend.... this is ridiculous
Hmmmm.
Cheaper to build new houses and flats.......
it was never meant to work in the first place
There's also a clause in the Rwanda plan which says that we will take a selection of THEIR refugees. It's true, I'm 100% serious, check if you don't believe me. Section 16 of the memorandum of understanding.
If the Conservatives would stop speedrunning being cartoonish villains, we could have a proper discussion about things like this, without the idea being seen as evil because evil people support it.
Imagine if someone good was doing this instead, to improve upon the old rules.
yep be nice if the papers reported all the facts rather than the Government propaganda like many don't mention as part of this we promise to take Rwandan refugees from there...
0:17 - wait, what, males only? Discrimination at its finest! 🤦🏼♀️
Anti-immigrant rhetoric is extremely anti-male. Apparently the livelihoods of adult men doesn't really matter as much as a women's. Ironic that leftists get accused of being anti-man, when nobody seems to think less of men than the right wing.
How is this legal? This is what we called being Shanghai’d.
The NI protocol is illegal. As is the Irish constitution under international law.
@@Nickle314 how is the Irish constitution illegal
@@Daniel-bb9qj No country is allowed to claim or aspire to rule over another. Ireland does that.
@@Nickle314 Okay hold on. By what law is it illegal? And secondly, if aspiring to rule over another country is illegal, how did the UK end up controlling Ireland
@@daraghmcquaid3277 UN Conventions make it illegal.
When the Ireland was part of the UK, which law were you referring to?
I may not be british but i think i can offer some inshigt into the conservatives view. Asylum seekers flee from country A where they persecuted, to country B where they are not. But the way conservatives see it they asylum seekers continue traveling to country C (Uk) passing through B, so to them they came from a country where they are NOT persecuted so from countrie's C perpective those fleeing from country A are not asylum seekers.
Under this "scheme" we also promise to take Rwandan refugees!!! Why don't you mention this??
204 people were 2020 asylum seekers looking to come to rwanda, there were 32000 applications for asylum in the UK from jan to june 2020
@@nevreiha he’s available on telegram
# alexmarciofx
Didn't the British conquer some of the African nations? I mean, shouldn't it be a way for the British govt to say sorry by allowing these people to come to their nation? Or at the very least put these cases to the top of the list to help and relocate and etc.
They're lucky the rest of the world isn't sending them a bill.
@@TheEightfoldWay Thank you! For that matter, how about the art that the British stole? Return that $hit or make an agreement that their borders will be open to those countries they took over.
What I simply don't get and cannot understand is why, WHY would any refugee or illegal immigrant want to go to a country that does not want you there and has policies in place to make your life absolutely miserable for going there?
WHY?
Particularly since the rest of europe seems more keen on accepting and helping refugees, why would you WANT to go to the UK? It just defies all logic and reason and common sense. And it isn't like you can get there by walking or hitchiking, it takes a special kind of effort to get a boat or a makeshift raft to float up there.
It makes more sense for Mexicans to run to the US because its the wealthiest nation in the world, literally the only option to the north, with the south being more poor countries with equally corrupt governments, and so on. But why the FUCK would you go to the UK as that whole society is backsliding deeper into xenophobia.
I'm not an expert, but I hear language and family ties are factors. Whatever the overall reasons, the fact that these policies are so ineffective at deterring immigration shows they must be powerful.
Because it was a stupid idea
@Prussianist Socialist it could be that..... or maybe it was a stupid idea in the first place.
We spend millions a day, its much cheaper then £120,000,000 and people are dying in the sea.
It is a great idea, it's a shame it's been sabotaged by people who haven't got the best interests of the country at heart.
not really
I didn't realise it was just males they were sending. I don't know why but that makes it even worse IMO.
How can someone from France or Europe be a victimised refugee.
Why can't you say European Mainland its not the continent- great Britain is part of the European continent
Britain pretends like it is Canada
WRONG NAME! IT SHOULD BE" Why everythingJohnson is doing is failing". He is the reincarnation of failure😳💥🤦♂️🤦♀️🙄
i really wish that one day people stop giving a shit about people crossing borders and just accept that we are all people on a fucking rock, the lines we drew on the rock are akin to a kid going "you cant cross this line" that he drew in the sand with his foot
If we could get the world to be atheist. We would have a lot more cooperation. It's never going to happen but it's what I would prey for if I was delusional.
@@briancohenthepfjmassive.4769 Oh! We tried, failed horribly :) 100 million dead, and still persuaded in China, it's called Communism, go check it out.
@@briancohenthepfjmassive.4769 people are free to believe what they wish to believe, there is no converting the world to one viewpoint as it would entail the suppression and prosecution of others, we just need to construct a more compassionate society with the lines of xenophobia and racism squashed out before they can be passed on
@@pierrereynaud784 yet there are 1.5billion of them so how many without the 100mils descendents. Humans are intelligent ants in the realms of space. Dog bless you are sole.
@@briancohenthepfjmassive.4769 you place too much faith in atheists, trust me many aren’t much different than their religious counterpart, just with a boner for feeling smarter for not being religious.
What has the European Convention on Human Rights ever done for us?
Plane tickets are expensive. HE shells are cheap.
Didn't know about the GFA requirement. Good to know.
Ok. You take the guys to Rwanda. You pay Rwanda. They take small boats and come right back.
Rwandan politicians are going to be so proud of themselves
Have you got a link with the 120 million per person
Exactly. Just creating a black market for those that aren't deterred by the law
120 mil upfront, 30k per person. Still an absolutely ludicrous idea.
Er, from Rwanda? It's land locked!
@@Obi_boy edited. Satisfied?
You have ommited some very important points regarding thier treatment once they are here, how they are used to take advantage of them and others , how it affects the labour market, how its affecting the housing market, how its affecting the nhs, etc etc, obviously there are alot of people who profit from the cheap labour that can be created by driving areas into poverty and desperation. I don't know if its because you are genuinely niave or too privileged to actually have any real concept of whats life is like for the poorer half of britain but your understanding of the situation clearly lacks perspective deliberately or otherwise.
That is like asking why does fire burn, it is its nature. Boris has been incompetent in every office he has held but hey he is a character right, that makes it all ok.
That ad was pretty good, how can we get the answer to the last one?
I bet if the government wouldn’t be spending this if the asylum seekers were landing a few miles further north.
Cost per asylum seeker: £30,000 plus £120,000,000/(Number deported -so far zero)
The money could be better spent “levelling up” the midlands, north and west of the country.
The entire country is in a recession except for London and the Part still in the EU
What on earth does this even mean 🤣
It was going to cost the UK government 500,000 pounds to fly 7 people to Rawanda?
If the UK leaves the ECHR and people won't give a shit about that, then I probably better off leaving this mini-Russia
Foreign powers should never interfere is the democratic mandate of the people.
Wait.. this is for real and not just a meme?!
Somehow yes
Well they are illegal economic migrants so why should the uk keep them
Ikr
Yeah, Brexit seemed very unlikely too...
people smugglers will be encouraged coz of this...new opportunities of loopholes
"the Britain"?
Exactly what I was going to ask. Strange.
Doesn't not claiming asylum in the first safe country, prove their fear case isn't valid
Under the UN definition of a refugee, no it does not.
Challenge: have a positive segment about Johnson.
His absence.
What positive thing is there to say about him at the moment? It's all scandal, obvious failure, scandal, failure, failure, scandal....
@@chrisoddy8744
That's exactly what they say about Biden. That's what they said about Trump, that's what they said about Obama, that's what they said about Bush. That's the media bub. It's obviously not all true.
Yes, that was always going to be challenging. Even 20 years ago.
@@chasejordan22 They who? “The media” isn’t a singular unit.
Well I hope Rwanda already received the 120mil, but knowing the UK, it's probably a cheque-in-the-mail situation.
The Britain!
Here's hoping BoJo goes down in history as Boris 'Send them to Rwanda' Johnson (amongst many other clownish monikers of course!) 🤡
Doomed to failure and with two useless incompetants like Johnson and Patel too cowardly to stand up for us this was bound to happen .How the French must be laughing whilst endlessly shipping the dingy divers over here .
The so called United Kingdom deliberately insult and upset the French then act surprised that the refugees are being sent across.
Nothing or nobody should have dominion over the Tory Elitists!!!!
Rwanda policy. Call it what it is, Human trafficking
Wouldn't be surprised if the Tories want to pull out of the ICJ just like the US
@Prussianist Socialist Ero-what??
@Prussianist Socialist What do you want the ICJ to do? Send in the Stormtroopers? Call on the Rohirrim?
@Prussianist Socialist Got a few examples for those cases?
Conservative refused to leave ECHR vote Reform and Richard Tice will withdraw from ECHR
Please let this fail spectacularly so Denmark doesn’t go ahead with doing the same thing.
Don't worry it's failing in every way imaginable.
It is an extreme policy and I can understand the government wanting to deter illegal migrants coming to the UK. I mean when it gets out that if illegal migrants come here they get a 1 way ticket to Rwanda they'll think twice about coming here. The questions are, how many of the illegal migrants are there? Wouldn't taxpayers money be better spent hiring more border & customs people at our borders in the first place?
At this point it'd be cheaper and more humane to set up machine guns on the cliffs of Dover.
Thanks Tories for importing a million and getting rid of 30!
Might work
I didn't watch the video but now echr is ignored by Russia and Belarus. I'm not sure it's cool company for UK :)
Also, we need to get rid of citizenship by birth. If a parent or grandparent is a migrant, you have a 2nd citizenship should you misbehave
Human Rights" Hmm so what about my "Human Rights" living in my own country which is being invaded by so called "Asylum Seekers"... Just a wee thought...
Don’t worry everyone, this is a parody!
First
Can you comment on the refugees that the UK will be getting in return from Rwanda?
It'll be 2 types those which are Alphabet people because Rwanda isn't into that but those will be very small numbers it'll mainly be the ones with disabilities and learning difficulties because Rwanda doesn't have the resources to look after them whereas we have those resources and accessibility to provide the help they need
I don't recall hearing them mention that in the video which does seem on brand
How is this not Human Trafficking??? Britain going back to colonial slave trading, claiming it is for the "good of the people". The fact that this idea has even GOTTEN this far off the ground is disgusting.
This is what a "First World" country looks like? No thank you... I'd rather stay down here in SA, even if it's dangerous.
What is the European flag has to do with the European human rights court?
How much want they Save with this?
You could probably just rename this video, 'Why Johnson is failing'
The Britain
Should have sent them to Spain like Biden is, granted USA isn't in echr it is part of UN no one has batted an eyelid at his policy. But they aren't going to Spain for processing it's for good.
So why have approvals slowed down so much?. The pandemic? It almost seems deliberate, what gradual thing would cause that much of a backlog besides just ignoring them?
This is what the whole hard Brexit was about, but the British will never find out ((((((((((((((((((((-:
oh, and don't forget it's a reciprocal agreement...so for each illegal migrant we send to Rwanda, we take back a migrant from Rwanda. I'm sure they won't put that on the side of a bus.
Refugee: I am fleeing my homeland because of political persecution. GB:ok, take a number and go back, we’ll the THEM for your stay.
Wow, racist against Rwanda much? It's one of the few countries in Africa where a majority of the population actually thinks the country is heading in the right direction.
I am listening you for last half of year. And I'm afraid I started to suspect that you are partially financed by Moscow... Your theme pick is not so good/random to be considered as independent.
No he's funded by poncy little Englanders like himself who want to keep hearing reassuring things about his country rather than that it is going down the toilet
Why can’t the UK be more like Hungary and have a leader like Viktor Orban
will "The Britain" 😆 it's just Britain, what's with the "The"?
7:05 "not going well" basically every Tory policy
Neither is the 14 trillion pound socialist pension debt. How are you going to pay your £600,000 share?
Great video. But, just at the beginning you confuse. You say that an asylum seeker becomes a refugee only when their application is approved. But then you refer to them as refugees when they arrive. What is the right terminology. Also isn't it true that under EU law, asylum seekeds are required to apply for asylum at the first country of arrival? Eg France un this case ?
Italy is nearer to Rwanda than France. The whole of Europe doesn't just have one country in it thank goodness.
Government doesn't care about wasting money because it's not coming out of their pocket. It's we the taxpayers that are paying the bill.
at least it will build up the Rwanda's economy. how many Rwandan franc' is £120 million :') i also think £30k is not a bad price considering the average house in the UK given to them is worth £278,000. yet again a perfect example of why people voted for brexit.
UK should leave the ECHR
If they're worried about dangerous channel crossings they just need to open up for safe channel crossings or let people be processed in France. Anything is just meaningless wordplay.
They're worried about both safe and unsafe crossing
@@tomlxyz I wish the UK government would just be honest and tell the truth. They're not worried about people dying in the channel, they're worried about brown people.
UK 🇬🇧 Leaving Good Friday Agreement and Leaving the Human rights council would turn one massive middle finger to the USA 🇺🇸... This might 😉 just turn to a bigger problem then Taiwan 🇹🇼 or Ukraine 🇺🇦 conflicts
If it is only males who are being sent to Rwanda, is that not sex discrimination? Is sex discrimination legal? Also no (white) Ukrainian males are being sent to Rwanda. Is racial discrimination legal?
The sex discrimination point is interesting and had crossed my mind but the racial one is bad faith speculation, why pick that one trait of Ukrainians to focus on when various countries currently have an open door policy when it comes to those fleeing that conflict
Some people supported Brexit because of refugees and now UK started having refugees ironic😁
Why not instead open up a free migration zone in Ukraine for refugees
Everything Boris Johnson touches dies.
There all come over here as its benefit Britain and we're already an over crowded country.