Ajang lay himself says that there is diversity in history.Dates,names etc do not match and urged to read history.So his narration may b one historian,s point of view.Another narrator may have another way of view.So it can not be distorted.We have to read all histories and listen to all historians and atleast try to reach on a unbiased consensus or conclusion.
Very very interesting and informative, eagerly waiting for the 2nd part.
Thank you 🙏
Thank you❤❤❤ u so much my dear grand father
👍❤️👍❤️
Voice po clear yo merak lay... Plz mic used chos hy lay
👍👍
👍🏻
🤗🤗❤
First as usual
E bo tsangma lu pura salang ju ju
Julay
Jully ajang morup namgail ly nyere kesar gyalpe rongs na gyalpo Singay namgail rongs po nyan ches la ma skerpo rag ajang ly thukje chee
Totally... distorted history...
Hmm….
Why don’t you come up with the undistorted version of the story with solid evidence better than Ajang Motup Namgail ley.?
Why don't come and undisputed one and narrate it .
Only maulavi's created history is correct and non distorted?
Ajang lay himself says that there is diversity in history.Dates,names etc do not match and urged to read history.So his narration may b one historian,s point of view.Another narrator may have another way of view.So it can not be distorted.We have to read all histories and listen to all historians and atleast try to reach on a unbiased consensus or conclusion.