Steven, before you, I always had an interest in philosophy and in you I have found my teacher. By listening to your lectures I have learnt so much over time and even found philosophers that I find truly helpful in life such as Deleuze, Hegel, Husserl and now Heidegger. Thanks for all these wonderful insights. You do them so darn well. Yes, I'm a Patreon.
Thank you, for being a wonderful teacher. Wise, humble, humorous, open, a drive to share something you hold important and welcome expansion to it. A congenial tone, one that speaks like a valued high school friend...shooting off ideas by the light of the moon. Cool...I'm so happy you are. I started listening to "Up on a Roof" by James Taylor before an episode, then I look out over Lake Constance to the lights of Switzerland across the water, and it's all good. Greetings from Germany everyone, and thank you for all the wisdom each of you gives, all the time...
Just from listening to part 1, I humbly think you are a brilliant teacher - articulate and able explain a specific concept not as a standalone, but as it relates to other concepts in philosophy very well without losing focus. This helps me understand the newly introduced concept contextually and relationally. I look forward to part 2. Thanks.
Fucking shit man, don't bring that meathead shit in here, please. This is a podcast with a specific focus for people that actually like to think and learn
Thank you for the amazing work, commenting from Spain where me and my class have just debated collectively about heidegger in a lesson. Have reached a far better comprehension of his topics in half an hour here.
Thanks for posting these. I have been wanting to learn philosophy but been intimidated by how big the task seems to do so. This seems like a really approachable starting place.
Can you please do a full in depth series on phenomenology? I am a philo major at FSU, and this topic is never touched on, and it would be great to hear lectures on the subjects from you super in depth if possible. Thanks.
Hey! Thank you very much for the qualitative, interesting and skillfully presented material! Do you think you could also address some philosophical issues that fascinated Dostoevsky? Or Levinas, or Giovanni Pico della Mirandola :) (I recently discovered your channel, so it is very possible that you have already talked about those individuals, in which case, I apologize in advance)
I dunno if they’re as rigorous in their thought as the people you’ve discussed but I wonder if you’d have anything to say on Simone Weil or Georges Bataille
This was wonderful!!! But you did not explain Heidegger's concept of Das Sein (being). Maybe have another lecture Heidegger 2 Also, I was wondering why are you inside if you're an extravert? Are you sick or are you too disappointed with social interaction because the mass majority of people can't think?
the thing is... people have thought about this before... This is exactly the ways of thinking that advanced meditators use of self-inquiry when trying to attain enlightenment. It's just the approach is different. Where Heidegger is performing this thought in a philosophical context, Buddhist monks, Hindu monks, etc, have being engaged in this model for millennia. Self inquiry meditation is investigating the "I AM" presence, who is the "I" that is experiencing this. If you can go beyond that you will experience the shift in your perception of life - and it will be an experience not just an intellectual understanding. it requires a lot of discipline to train the mind to get to that level - and you do not have to belong to any faith to do it, they just happened to be doing this for years.
☆ If you really want to challenge normies at a party, just mention flat earth. However, if your looking for a debate with those normies, you should probably just get another beer. And if you don't have a bottle opener, getting that beer open will be a much more fulfilling challenge anyway, plus, the reward is a beer!
So frustrating! He's a brilliant explainer, and really knows his stuff, and also importantly, has a really sympathetic and warm way of relating to his audience. But like so many explanations, just when he gets to the point, the place beyond the obvious, where we really need an example, he flakes out and says it's not important. (17:33). Many of the philosophers, Kant for example, didn't give examples of trains of thought, just presented ideas. Maybe it's because there's nothing there?
What would the world and humanity look like now if there had been a work similar to Sein und Zeit written by Plato instead? Well, that is a nice thought-experiment in its own self-contained bubble but not that relevant a question in all fairness of actual factuality of things and elements, processes, dynamics, dialectics and structures of historical reality. And besides, we had the (early) Christian tradition codified in the notion of grace. It didn’t save us either. Lol. -Okay, let me give it a try: Had Mr. Plato come up with the core ideas of Sein und Zeit and had his imaginary work enjoeyd the similar popularity and influence his actual works did in due course of Western intellectual and cultural history we might have a nice happy hippie polygamous tribal communities living from the Earth scattered around mediterranean Europe cultivating grapes and stuff and drinking lots of wine dwelling in gentle groves hiding from the Sun half-naked married with a strong sense of being there, rooted in local (monocultural!) identities, prefering being drunk, making love in groups, playing organic flutes and singing in exctasy of Being to more rational or individual endeavours. Not that bad, if you think about it, rather Roussean - and very Heideggerian! But then again, that is just a hindsight. Paradise lost!
Warmed over Hinduism with accreditation. Typical of all major German philosophers except Schopenauer who called Kant "The Chinaman of Konnigsburg". (Buddhism). Heidegger did not know Being (only intellectually, not existentially). If he knew Being he would meditate and have all his questions answered (happiness--the Laughing Buddha). You don't fear death when meditating. Silly--belief in absolute unfettered freedom (stepping on other people) without Ethics. We are now returning to Ethics/Reason, not Heidegger/Nietzsche/Marx--yesterday's news--we can no longer afford the murder and mayhem of absolute freedom and the absolute state or end of freedom (Marxism)--an idiotic, absurd contradiction. All artists who believe in absolute freedom are Marxists who believe in the absolute state, the corset to relieve the freedom, thus revealing the absolute hoax.
For me, this is the best introduction to Heidegger I've heard.
I thank you, and look forward to the next part.
Best introduction ever heard about Heidegger , kudos thank you.
also: i would love a series on husserlian phenomenology.
TheEthanAndKyleShow agreed!
@@sadiem6758 Merleau-Ponty
@@RecalibratedAxe Merleau-Ponty is, laconically, heidegger turned towards the /embodied/ being
the youtube account Absurd Being has a whole videoseries of explaining MP's phenomenology of perception per chapter :)
Steven, before you, I always had an interest in philosophy and in you I have found my teacher. By listening to your lectures I have learnt so much over time and even found philosophers that I find truly helpful in life such as Deleuze, Hegel, Husserl and now Heidegger. Thanks for all these wonderful insights. You do them so darn well. Yes, I'm a Patreon.
Thank you, for being a wonderful teacher. Wise, humble, humorous, open, a drive to share something you hold important and welcome expansion to it. A congenial tone, one that speaks like a valued high school friend...shooting off ideas by the light of the moon. Cool...I'm so happy you are. I started listening to "Up on a Roof" by James Taylor before an episode, then I look out over Lake Constance to the lights of Switzerland across the water, and it's all good. Greetings from Germany everyone, and thank you for all the wisdom each of you gives, all the time...
Just from listening to part 1, I humbly think you are a brilliant teacher - articulate and able explain a specific concept not as a standalone, but as it relates to other concepts in philosophy very well without losing focus. This helps me understand the newly introduced concept contextually and relationally. I look forward to part 2.
Thanks.
I heard about this on Joe Rogan. Ironically its changed who I listen to at work now.
Still love Joe but this is so much more.
Wow. I wasn't expecting Rogan to listen to this. Neat.
Why did you have to ruin this by mentioning you heard about it on Joe Rogan...PFF
_whom*_
_(see: objective pronoun)_
_I thought you meant Joe Rogan was talking about Heidegger. I'm thinking... I doubt that!_
Fucking shit man, don't bring that meathead shit in here, please. This is a podcast with a specific focus for people that actually like to think and learn
Fantastic job. A gentle suggestion for an ep: Ernest Becker and the Denial of Death.
more husserl pls
This was great, thank u. Heidegger is such a difficult read, and so this short intro has helped clarify how I might best proceed.
Thank you for the amazing work, commenting from Spain where me and my class have just debated collectively about heidegger in a lesson. Have reached a far better comprehension of his topics in half an hour here.
Great to cover Heidegger. Please keep more videos coming. Awesome topic
Thanks for posting these. I have been wanting to learn philosophy but been intimidated by how big the task seems to do so. This seems like a really approachable starting place.
I love your work. Will search through your site in hope of finding pieces on the simulation theory, on karma, and on solipsism.
hashtag team being :D I truly love your humor! Every Episode is beacon of deligt! Keep up the great work! I will support you on patreon! Thanks agin!
Can you please do a full in depth series on phenomenology? I am a philo major at FSU, and this topic is never touched on, and it would be great to hear lectures on the subjects from you super in depth if possible. Thanks.
Fantastic epilogue/outro for the episode.
wooooah just found a good binge series, nice stuff!
this is excellent. great work! +1 subscriber
Finally made it thru episode 100!
Great episode!
man you are incredible
Do Jayden smith
Hey! Thank you very much for the qualitative, interesting and skillfully presented material! Do you think you could also address some philosophical issues that fascinated Dostoevsky? Or Levinas, or Giovanni Pico della Mirandola :) (I recently discovered your channel, so it is very possible that you have already talked about those individuals, in which case, I apologize in advance)
thanks could you possibly do something on diogenes and his perceptions on life
Are you planning on doing Julius Evola?
@TheBmo4538 You first
Thanks, funny and accessible.
Thank you for, that's the best, can we have something on Bergson or Cassirer
Hello id like a series on husserlian phenomenology please and thank you!
I dunno if they’re as rigorous in their thought as the people you’ve discussed but I wonder if you’d have anything to say on Simone Weil or Georges Bataille
More Husserl please!!
For a video called Phenomenology and Dasein, I am on minute 22/31 and we have barely mentioned Heidegger.
Now we’re talking....!
Thank you so much
Husserl's Phenomenology Please...
This was wonderful!!!
But you did not explain Heidegger's concept of Das Sein (being). Maybe have another lecture Heidegger 2 Also,
I was wondering why are you inside if you're an extravert? Are you sick or are you too disappointed with social interaction because the mass majority of people can't think?
Isn't this the Buddhist idea of object and subject being one only stated 2000 years earlier?
Even before that advaita vedanta hinduism
@@lucasheijdeman2581 thank you for your reply something new to study and discover
@@davidblum292 no problem dude enjoy!
what does Heidegger mean by Transcendence?
The rest of the talk is stunning, though -
Merleau-Ponty please
5:54
more heidegger pls
the thing is... people have thought about this before... This is exactly the ways of thinking that advanced meditators use of self-inquiry when trying to attain enlightenment. It's just the approach is different. Where Heidegger is performing this thought in a philosophical context, Buddhist monks, Hindu monks, etc, have being engaged in this model for millennia. Self inquiry meditation is investigating the "I AM" presence, who is the "I" that is experiencing this. If you can go beyond that you will experience the shift in your perception of life - and it will be an experience not just an intellectual understanding. it requires a lot of discipline to train the mind to get to that level - and you do not have to belong to any faith to do it, they just happened to be doing this for years.
Edmund Husserl please..
Uh-oh ... another mindbender ...
I have to put the speed to 0.75 to fully digest your words.
☆ If you really want to challenge normies at a party, just mention flat earth. However, if your looking for a debate with those normies, you should probably just get another beer. And if you don't have a bottle opener, getting that beer open will be a much more fulfilling challenge anyway, plus, the reward is a beer!
If I've thought it . It exists .
28:39 Just look at eastern philosophy
Is it a positive comment or a negative comment i.e. a taunt ?
@@yash6609 it's a comment
So frustrating! He's a brilliant explainer, and really knows his stuff, and also importantly, has a really sympathetic and warm way of relating to his audience. But like so many explanations, just when he gets to the point, the place beyond the obvious, where we really need an example, he flakes out and says it's not important. (17:33). Many of the philosophers, Kant for example, didn't give examples of trains of thought, just presented ideas. Maybe it's because there's nothing there?
Husserl! Husserl! Husserl!
24:40 I seriously laughed so hard I could have woken up my neighbors.
You sound like Dr Frasier Crane.
What would the world and humanity look like now if there had been a work similar to Sein und Zeit written by Plato instead? Well, that is a nice thought-experiment in its own self-contained bubble but not that relevant a question in all fairness of actual factuality of things and elements, processes, dynamics, dialectics and structures of historical reality. And besides, we had the (early) Christian tradition codified in the notion of grace. It didn’t save us either. Lol. -Okay, let me give it a try: Had Mr. Plato come up with the core ideas of Sein und Zeit and had his imaginary work enjoeyd the similar popularity and influence his actual works did in due course of Western intellectual and cultural history we might have a nice happy hippie polygamous tribal communities living from the Earth scattered around mediterranean Europe cultivating grapes and stuff and drinking lots of wine dwelling in gentle groves hiding from the Sun half-naked married with a strong sense of being there, rooted in local (monocultural!) identities, prefering being drunk, making love in groups, playing organic flutes and singing in exctasy of Being to more rational or individual endeavours. Not that bad, if you think about it, rather Roussean - and very Heideggerian! But then again, that is just a hindsight. Paradise lost!
Running to fast..... whats the point? None would find a time to consider or think what u say
10:53 :)
cool beings
14:20 - 14:25
But didn’t you have a wife?
She was a goat. They got married in Vegas :D
@@natalia_321
Doesn’t even what a human being is
Just get on with it. Always with the 10 minute intros to these kind of videos.
Husserl couldn't have cared less about ontology? What?
Warmed over Hinduism with accreditation. Typical of all major German philosophers except Schopenauer who called Kant "The Chinaman of Konnigsburg". (Buddhism). Heidegger did not know Being (only intellectually, not existentially). If he knew Being he would meditate and have all his questions answered (happiness--the Laughing Buddha). You don't fear death when meditating. Silly--belief in absolute unfettered freedom (stepping on other people) without Ethics. We are now returning to Ethics/Reason, not Heidegger/Nietzsche/Marx--yesterday's news--we can no longer afford the murder and mayhem of absolute freedom and the absolute state or end of freedom (Marxism)--an idiotic, absurd contradiction. All artists who believe in absolute freedom are Marxists who believe in the absolute state, the corset to relieve the freedom, thus revealing the absolute hoax.
O chuj tu chodzi? wytlumacz ktos brat da mi 5zl
Heidegger skrytykował Kartezjusza. To także filozofia dotycząca języka i jego wpływu na sposób myślenia
_stop writing for one year_
slow down man, take it easy. you talk way to fast. so many others to listen to. good bye