Support me if you want me to create more QM II videos: th-cam.com/users/universaldenker-physicsjoin Do you want to solve every physics problem? Try my eBook! ✅ Contains many useful physics formulas. ✅ Understandable for everyone, because it contains no vectors and integrals. ✅ Formulas are colored and visualized. ✅ Perfect for high school and undergraduate physics students. Click on the following link to get the book: en.universaldenker.org/physics-equations-book
I think algebraically they are quite similar. The main difference I see is the physical or geometric interpretation, and whether it is discrete or continuous like with a Hilbert space, and if there is some notion of Fourier pairs and commutivity relations.
Thank you! Feel free to join the polls I'm doing in the community tab. There you can vote for the next video topic: th-cam.com/users/universaldenker-physicscommunity If you like my channel and like my videos, I would be happy about a small donation: tinyurl.com/denker-donate Top supporter appear in the Hall of Fame: universaldenker.org/supporter
Thank you! Feel free to join the polls I'm doing in the community tab. There you can vote for the next video topic: th-cam.com/users/universaldenker-physicscommunity If you regularly visit my channel and like my videos, I would be happy about 1 x coffee ☕ per month: th-cam.com/users/universaldenker-physicsjoin
we can swap because no, they are not matrices. Psi might technically be defined as a column vector in a hilbert space but understood to just be a complex-valued function. H is an operator on Psi that won't change this, so it would actually be a row vector times a column vector which we know is the scalar product
I hate that good content nowadays is so much under appreciated ...all people want is intrigue there 5 second attention span ..they just say they all wanna learn something but only on surface level..dude i know i shouldn't say this or have the right to even remotely say this but i think u should quit making these cause it,ll be huge waste of your time and motivation if no one appreciates your work and should focus only on what you like... again i am extremely sorry but this is all coming from a good heart...or ...you can continue to make these phenomenal conceptual videos, if you like making them ...who am I to be in your way...i .am just a rando..♥️♥️♥️
Stern Gerlach experiment and electron spin. Especially the prove that electron is spin half particle. I'm pretty much confused as to what is half spin actually. A video is requested.
Thanks for the video suggestions! I will mention them in the next poll! If you regularly visit my channel and like my videos, I would be happy about 1 x coffee ☕ per month: th-cam.com/users/universaldenker-physicsjoin
I think the way to go about it is to expose yourself to gradually more difficult and abstract physics subjects, perhaps starting with classical newtonian mechanics, then move on to electromagnetism, then perhaps thermodynamics, lagrangian and hamiltonian mechanics and then quantum mechanics. Just an example. This was the rough order of subjects during my undergraduate degree.
im currently studying this in the third year of my maths degree so this stuff is pretty hard to learn without some background knowledge in linear algebra, ordinary differential equations, newtonian, hamiltonian, langrangian mechanics. I find it hard and i have knowledge in these fields.
Support me if you want me to create more QM II videos: th-cam.com/users/universaldenker-physicsjoin
Do you want to solve every physics problem? Try my eBook!
✅ Contains many useful physics formulas.
✅ Understandable for everyone, because it contains no vectors and integrals.
✅ Formulas are colored and visualized.
✅ Perfect for high school and undergraduate physics students.
Click on the following link to get the book:
en.universaldenker.org/physics-equations-book
After a long time ,now I understand the Bra ket notation , thanks a lot
Very well done! I enjoyed the clear easy to follow narrative.
This is 'The masterpiece'.
could you pls explain difference between eigen state,eigen function, eigen vector.
yes, I will do it
I think algebraically they are quite similar. The main difference I see is the physical or geometric interpretation, and whether it is discrete or continuous like with a Hilbert space, and if there is some notion of Fourier pairs and commutivity relations.
Very nice graphics man, keep up the good work! Your channel is imensly helpful for STEM studensts
thank you very much!
FINALLY, I understood something!! Thank you so much!
This is so great!
great effort
Thank you!
Feel free to join the polls I'm doing in the community tab. There you can vote for the next video topic:
th-cam.com/users/universaldenker-physicscommunity
If you like my channel and like my videos, I would be happy about a small donation:
tinyurl.com/denker-donate
Top supporter appear in the Hall of Fame: universaldenker.org/supporter
nice explanation 👍
Thank you!
Feel free to join the polls I'm doing in the community tab. There you can vote for the next video topic:
th-cam.com/users/universaldenker-physicscommunity
If you regularly visit my channel and like my videos, I would be happy about 1 x coffee ☕ per month:
th-cam.com/users/universaldenker-physicsjoin
amazing thank you so much 🤩🤩🤩
Excuse me, I have a question at 1:30: why could we swap? And it obviously is not scalar, they are two matrixes, right?
We can swap because two scalar functions are commutative.
we can swap because no, they are not matrices. Psi might technically be defined as a column vector in a hilbert space but understood to just be a complex-valued function. H is an operator on Psi that won't change this, so it would actually be a row vector times a column vector which we know is the scalar product
Omg I've the same question too. Do you have any reason why it is?
Nice one 👍👍👍
thank you 😊
I hate that good content nowadays is so much under appreciated ...all people want is intrigue there 5 second attention span ..they just say they all wanna learn something but only on surface level..dude i know i shouldn't say this or have the right to even remotely say this but i think u should quit making these cause it,ll be huge waste of your time and motivation if no one appreciates your work and should focus only on what you like... again i am extremely sorry but this is all coming from a good heart...or ...you can continue to make these phenomenal conceptual videos, if you like making them ...who am I to be in your way...i .am just a rando..♥️♥️♥️
Thank you
Stern Gerlach experiment and electron spin. Especially the prove that electron is spin half particle. I'm pretty much confused as to what is half spin actually. A video is requested.
Thanks for the video suggestions! I will mention them in the next poll!
If you regularly visit my channel and like my videos, I would be happy about 1 x coffee ☕ per month:
th-cam.com/users/universaldenker-physicsjoin
My pleasure 🥰. Not only I visit your channel regularly, but I have also subscribed now. Bell icon pressed too for any update from your channel.
Thank very match
Thank you too
Your welcam
What do I need to understand this type of mathematics a new brain?
I think the way to go about it is to expose yourself to gradually more difficult and abstract physics subjects, perhaps starting with classical newtonian mechanics, then move on to electromagnetism, then perhaps thermodynamics, lagrangian and hamiltonian mechanics and then quantum mechanics. Just an example. This was the rough order of subjects during my undergraduate degree.
im currently studying this in the third year of my maths degree so this stuff is pretty hard to learn without some background knowledge in linear algebra, ordinary differential equations, newtonian, hamiltonian, langrangian mechanics. I find it hard and i have knowledge in these fields.