ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
Serial killer Travels Back in Time Every 9 Years Thanks to a Real-World Phenomenon
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ย. 2022
- A police officer from Philadelphia becomes obsessed with a serial killer that shows up every nine years and knows things about his life before they happen.
Subscribe to our friends channel: tinyurl.com/Mo...
![[Official Music Video] ฝังใจ - BOW Maylada [Prod. By Tan LIPTA]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/rSjk1jKWRN4/mqdefault.jpg)
I laughed out loud when he said Philadelphia 2024, The streets are abandoned and on fire. He should have said 2020
😑😑
🤣😂
My poor city 😭😭
Its too early to laugh out loud yet 😒
@@Batest212 2 years more to go hahaha
Just wait until Trump wins in 2024
Facta
My favorite part is that in the 27 years he's been obsessed with catching her it's likely he's mentioned her name to his daughter. And she chose to name her daughter after the person responsible for how he became.
Also she said she can't change him killing her because she can't change the past when that's 100% what she's trying to do in the first place.
I suspect multiple parallel timelines. By manipulating on of the many pasts timelines. She hopes to ensure where a timeline comes to existence where the civil war was prevented that her alternative future versions don't have to suffer through it.
@@SeraphimRoad yet that doesn't change the fact there are countless timelines where the suffering exists or is perhaps even worse. Its a halfassed time thriller that didn't think too hard about its script. One of those Brain off, just Clap films. Good when you're mindlessly watching it, a whole mess if you think about it a bit.
the past was her future, so for her he cannot change what happens in the past (her future) because she didn't reach that point yet. her jumps goes from the Leads future towards the past.
We don't know if he mentions Rya to his daughter since they are estranged. And before that, she was just a baby, so he probably wouldn't have mentioned cases to her regardless.
In terms of stopping him from killing her, it cannot work because she's going backwards through time and he's going forwards. He kills her the first time they meet. Whereas, the timeline she's trying to change is in the distant future.
Great point of view
"You've got to stop me from killing you in the past."
"Sorry, time travel is a one way trip. Can't change what's already happened."
"Oh. What are you doing here anyway?"
"Changing the future by stopping a war."
I think that would stop her from dying though bc if that first explosion doesn't happen then the civil war doesn't happen and she doesn't have to volunteer to go back and therefore everyone loves a normal life right?
I wonder if the writers understand the hole they wrote themselves into. Either way his granddaughter was going to die by his hands, so why not do it in order to stop all the horrible stuff from happening to him?
@@akuroku69 yeah but if she killed all the people before they were able to carry out that first explosion that started the civil war in the first place... Then that would mean those events now never took place and so everyone gets to live normal lives then right? I'm so confused
@@maddieb2512 the issue is, is a different timeline. She is gone from this time line
Lol.... It is like impregnate your mom to produce you theory lol but if the time machine never happen how did you went into the past to create you by impregnating your mother. This theory was presented on Terminator lol which I believed that the John Connor on that second movie is the fake John Connor
A pianist, cook and a bus driver... Sounds like the start of a great joke
Movie Title: In the Shadow of the Moon
It's literally in the first second of the video
@@1XXL1 What do you think people have an attention span great than oooh what's that a butterfly?
\
They do this on purpose hoping you will click on the video..If they put the name of the movie and you’ve watched it before you wouldn’t click on the video
@@1XXL1 Yet people keep asking. Don't have a good explanation.
Please bring back the old voice 😞
“Any black women they can find” is a wild sentece
These videos saves me SO much time, watching movies I would regret watching.. Thank you 👌
how do you watch thwm when they give no names for the movies?
@@garysalmon9629 I don’t watch them.. I watch these instead 🙂
Ended up watching the movie, and while I can say that the acting was surprisingly good, the premise is just too stupid. The movie breaks its own rules quite a bit, including this idea that, "You can't change time, what has happened/will happen must happen" and then *immediately* let's you know that Rya's mission is to literally change time, which ends up changing the timeline.
Thomas survives being pushed out of an airplane, the movie immediately forgives and forgets Rya killed Maddox like, "oopsie poopsie!"
The commentary on modern America being full of radicals is a bit on the nose, pretty much insinuating that a bomb going off was enough to start a civil war which felt unrealistic to me.
Overall 5/10 movie, good recap.
Thank you for your service!
What is the Title of the Movie?
@@benedictteo3689 “In the Shadow of the Moon” it came out a few years ago
@@jeepersitsmeepers Thanks Nicholas!
The movie never really broke its rule. When the girl was killed that was her final trip to the past, when she meets old man Thomas that was her first trip to the past. She needs to die in order for her to exist. If she never died in the subway, Thomas never misses his wife’s death and child’s birth, he never obsesses over the time traveller and his daughter ends up living a different life leading to a different daughter leading to no one able to stop the civil war in the future
Interesting how he could see reason to justify the murders because he discovered she was his grand daughter, lol. If she wasn't, all she tried explaining would have been bullshit
What happened to your husky voice?? ☹️
I don’t like the new VoiceOver. The other one was so comforting and intriguing to listen to
Bring back the old voice, and the old background music
Did we change the computer generator script reader's voice?
If she changes the future though by stopping that first explosion then it never happens and she doesn't have to volunteer for that job and never die then right?
Yep, if time cannot be changed (as she states), then the bombing either cannot be stopped, or never happened in the first place. Writers boned it on this logic
It all depends on what time travel theory you subscribe to. In a single timeline theory, this paradox exists. But, if you believe in parallel universes or timelines, then each change in the past creates a new timeline. Her changing things could create a new, better timeline even though her old one is still bad. That bad timeline still existing makes it so that she always goes back to fix the past and create the new timelines
@@Inscipio Yeah I personally love time travel stories that deal with this paradox. Its one of the most interesting subgenres of science fiction to me. The recap was good but this is probably one of those movies that you need to watch the whole thing to really get a grasp on the rules (and therefore the consequences) of this universe and to really understand what's going on. And even though I know the big twist now I think this still might be a movie worth checking out.
@@maddieb2512 it's self correcting
@@Inscipio The primary issue is that she travel's futher back with each jump, which mean's she has literally no free will at all since her action's have already occured. Also she isn't actually his grand daughter in his timeline unless his obsession with hunting her down an no actual effect on his daughters life at all, leading to her still marrying the same person. Therefore he doesn't even kill his own grand daughter he kill's a potentential grand daughter.
You are correct that there is likely 1 timeline with 3 branches each starting from the point she jumpe back. 2 of them functionally don't exist since her first and second jump initially would have had her jumping back earlier in that timeline yet. This does run into a slight issue where she get's replicated over multiple timelines, unless non function timelines colapse due to being paradox's.
I guess the main point is that jumping back in time in interacting with people who have interacted with you in their own past but your future implies that noone in the movies setting actually has any freewill.
For example it's physically impossible for her to die on her first 2 trip's back in time since she alway's makes the third jump back within that timeline.
It's not that she can't stop him from killing her, but that she won't. If this doesn't happen, he won't be the same.
She already changed him by jumping back in the first place.
No, she can't stop him from killing her because she died in the past.
She is time travelling to the past while the world is going forward into the future.
So, the "first time" she time travelled into the past, she met the grandad in the beach, the second time was when she escaped in the motorcycle and she was injured in her hand by the bullets from the grandad, the third time she time travelled into the past was where the aircraft was kept (or something like that), then, she time travelled into the past for the last time when she was killed in the subway.
im so glad you recapped this movie. It was a lowkey amazing film. Reallycaught me off guard in the end and on my toes the entirre movie. Ive found so many gem of movies when trying to find something as noise to sleep to. I watched The Gentlemen at like 4am, never heard of it or saw a trailer. What an absolute BANGER to stumble across.
Check out:
Seven Psychopaths
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels
Snatch
Rock N Rolla
It would be FANTASTIC if this site actually gave a name of the movie!
It's at the beginning of the video, on the bottom
In the Shadow of the Moon
agreed! this site frustrate the hell out of me when they give no titles, I may just may unsubscribe to eliviate my frustration with them not having movie titles.
@@garysalmon9629 it’s always at the bottom at the beginning, silly person.
@@sechronos2541 thank you. I saw thiw film a while back and couldnt remember the name to watch it again.
Missing our robot voice 🥺
Me tooooo
I hate robot voices for these channels
That fifty year old suited man telling bedtime stories on an elevator in Germany sounded much more soothing.
The only part of this that could be described as a “real world phenomena” is that “ the police arrest every black woman they can find”
As soon as the antagonist was shown, it was obvious that she wouldn't actually be evil.
Yup and we all know why. The hint was the initial hunt for the suspect.
Yep.. this mess of a time travel film looks to be pure woke lib cliche garbage
I always thought of time travel as a separate entity every specific moment in time you jump to does not influence the future due to the grandfathers paradox. So in reality she changes nothing since her timeline literally can't be saved. But you could avoid the future disaster. But at the same time preventing a war may also lead to a plague or maybe extreme climate change due to the butterfly effect of her actions.
while butterfly effect is a thing in reality the effects it would have would be more a quantity thing. its not about the major changes. thats a movie thing. is it possible to lead to major changes sure. but is every murder on earth leading to the end of the world suddenly? no. then it wouldnt if you time traveled to do it either. millions of things would eventually be different but that vast majority of them would be ultimately mundane.
To me this sorta feels like a closed loop time travel idea if anything. This is mostly cause of the fact the time travel was repeating events that will lead up to her death, no matter what changes are made they are still gonna happen, other wise she would not have even needed to jump into the past in the first place.
It's like trunks from dbz
@@gsamalot I would also think it would be a closed loop. But her killing all those people would it still have avoided the bombing and war? Same reason if someone was to go back to soviet Russia would killing Stallin avoid the Cold War? I think she fixed her problem but ultimately her future-timeline sacrificed herself so this would not happen in the current one. But it's just putting a bandaid on what is to eventually come regardless.
Question?? If she succeeded in changing her timeline, she wouldn't needed to go back in time to eliminate the people responsible for the war in the future.. So then since she never went back and will the same events eventually happen again??
You movie encapsulators REALLY need to indicate the title of the movie you are condensing so we can find the whole movie to watch them.
In the Shadow of the Moon (2019)
Riah-"i can't change the past"
Also Riah-"I'm trying to change the past"
That Ryah biach would have made her granddad's life 99% less clueless bringing some papers with future proof, but ah' ya' can't change time. Well how the eff did they reset the "future-past" for from their perspective the "Trump voters doing Helter Skelter" was also the past?
you guys need to watch Tenet to understand the concept.
@KhightofJustice2 I don't mean literally. I mean the contradiction that people think isn't there if they knew how tenet works or time travel in movies works in general. Movies allow paradoxes to happen as long as it fits the story. Takes away freewill
Like many people I m asking for the old voice and old bgm to be back again.
:(
I can't bring myself to watch the video with the new one
Couldn't she tell him before he looses all his lifetime looking for her? So nice for her grandfather, only telling him after hes a shell of a man, lost everything... she could have told from the first time. Anyway, she is obviously someone with no empathy, who doesn't care about her family.
2 years from now some sh*t gonna go down for real.
Yeah, a contested POTUS election distracts the nation sufficiently to embolden Winnie the Poo to invade Taiwan. A preemptive strike destroys enough of our Pacific fleet to leave us on the backfoot, the first time that's happened in conventional warfare since WWII. But this time we consider a tactical nuke.
I really hope we take the loss and don't nuke the Chinese navy no matter how beneficial it is. They "only" have a few hundred nukes and at most a only a few missiles that can carry a nuke to US territory, and even then it's "only" Hawaii. Which they try and we shoot down.
Doesn';t reall matter tho because what comes next will make WWII look like the Spanish American War. 60 to 100 million people died in WWII. If WWIII kills less than a billion, we shall consider ourselves lucky.
Bc even if the armed conflicts don't kille that many, the resulting disruption to the global supply chain that feeds, clothes, houses, and heals over half the planet will could kill hundreds of millions in a few months.
War in Ukraine kills hundreds of thousands in Africa and Southern Asia. What happens when there's war in the wheat fields of Eastern Europe AND the plains of North America AND the rice paddies of Asia? When nations divide and region battles region for the rights to pump the trickle that is the once-mighty Colorado? When the strongest most stable nation in history devolves in just a few decades to the point that its western states INVADE its eastern states to take its endless freshwater sources.
It will be - once again - up to us to pull the world back from the brink. But we aren't a cohesive unit anymore. We are veering sharply toward dissolution in our lifetime.
😂😂😂Don't know why I found your comment funny 😁
Its already started. War against humanity with the fake injection, orchestrated famine and energy crisis.
@@positivevibes9891 thank you 😂😂
@@cubensis7706 damn
Time travel movies are interesting but he could just change the stuff now if she gives him all the information.
Bring back the old voice man
Jonathan Frakes did an amazing job directing this movie.
0:13 did anyone else think it looked like a pair of eyes in the back of the hoodie?
0:40 Detective Holt, "Peralta! Do you think you can impersonate me by wearing glasses?"
Wonder why he doesn't say the name of the movie in the beginning anymore.
why didn't she just explain it to him in the goddamn subway station in 1988 ?! coulda saved the guy 30 years of trouble. fuck !
Because she never would exist and this would then mean that the civil war would still happen
"Sorry, time travel is a one way trip. Can't change what's already happened."
Me: So, you mean the war can't be stopped?
"Yup, pretty much. We are all wasting our time. I bet the time traveling mass murderer caused the war in the first place."
Literally. shit was hysterical
It's weird that creators have to blur and censor yet the movies on TH-cam are not under such restrictions
Ahh I've seen this film .. watched it a bit ago thinking it was half decent .. I mean it is pretty good until the time travel reveal where you are just absolutely baffled and thus the film is ruined and turns in to utter dross after. If it stayed with the serial killer angle, that would have been decent!
I MIGHT LIKE TO WATCH THIS MOVIE...IF I KNEW THE FRIGGING NAME OF IT....
In the Shadow of the Moon (2019)
Literally in the first 2 seconds of the video
New robo-voice is horribly high-pitched. yucky!
The good thing about time travel is it's just a theory, unless someone has time traveled the rules are really anyone's guess go wild with time stories no one really knows the true rules anyways
People have been time traveling, governments have Hiden the technology
"The police start interrogating every Black woman they can find." Way too accurate.
Him they all die at the same time
Me: Death note time baby😂
Literally, she could have just explained that to him in the first place.
So this is how Dexter got in law enforcement!
Name of movie please?
Please bring the robot voice. Thanks.
"In The Shadow Of The Moon."
Absolutely terrific movie!
Can't help humming "in..west Philadelphia born and rasied..."
Dumb politics , dumb plot ,dumb Solutions but exelent recap .
In The Shadow Of The Moon a Netflix movie. I enjoyed watching this one. Highly recommended.
BRING BACK THE OLD VOICE
Netflix has a way of dumbing audience and ruining expectations. This is one example.
@2:31 "Thomas leaves the station"...sounds familiar😂
Very interesting recap of a movie I'll watch now in its entirety. The twists and turns were incredible. 💪🏼🙏🏻✨
"BUT YOU CAN'T TRAVEL BACK AND CHANGE THE PAST!" She says as she is attempting to travel back in time to change the past.
She's in a time paradox.Basiclly,what happened in the past was and is always going to happen.Shes suppose to be there and thus the series of events happen when she travels into the past.
She is literally changing her past with every word she utters.
@@thedragonlee76 Actually no. It's just the standard excuse writers use when they want to make something about time travel, but don't want to have to deal with any of the actual ramifications of time travel.
Either time travel CAN let her change the past, or it can't. Here, the movie is expressly trying to have both sides.
@@dragonstryk7280 There's alot of paradoxical theories...1,Terminator...John Conner sent his father into the past and thus so he would be born and he knew Reese was going to die.2,The old black and white Twilight Zone episode which showed a time traveler trying to change major events like trying to kill Hitler,but he is always stopped because time stopped him.And then there's the multiverse theory,where if you,the time traveler,change things in the past,you would be the only one to know. And then,there's the invisible time traveler theory and that theory is that time travelers have appeared throughout history but they don't change or interact and all and they do is just observe history.
@@thedragonlee76 Except NONE of those are being used here. 1. John Connor is closing a loop created by previous time travel. 2. The Twilight Zone had time as an outside force, and multiverse theory doesn't apply here, or else it's useless, since it won't even effect anything for the person killing all of these people.
As well, we get the "It already happened, so it can't be changed" line FROM the Time Traveler who is traveling to change what already happened.
It's lazy crap.
About Time did it better, where the MC could really change things, but hits an issue after he has his first child. Essentially, throw anything off before the child is born, and you'll likely be coming back to a very different child, cause there are too many biological variables to be able to guarantee the same child if you change things.
Nice story. Thanks for the recap
the ai voice over much better to this new voice
Why the hell The Dexter have to be in another serial killer movie ? 🤣🤣🤣
How old is thils flick? What's it called? They really weaved in that "white supremacy" bogeyman into the plot didn't they?
Except boogeymen are fictional.
@@rasengdori13 WOOOSH.... that's the sound of this comment flying way above your head..
Serial killer turnout to be saving the world. While the hero, letting apocalypse happen. Nice twist.
Feels weird seeing bokeem woodbine playing as the good guy
He was good in that elevator movie
Problems witb time travel is that usually no matter how hard or far back you travel you will only escalate events to happen sooner than they were supposed to for the most part. Everything is being built up to essentially repeat themselves anyway with the doctor making the poison and finding out the truth, the daughter being born, and possibly due to him delaying her by those few seconds to minutes of exposition is what will cause the bomber to still get away with it anyway...which is funny and stupid because why wouldn't their first target be the very man that activated and basically made the bomb to begin with...
This movie was utter waste of time garbage. I wish I watched the recap instead of the movie.
Wow this was wayyy better than I was expecting.
I really liked this movie and watched it a couple of times. I think it's underrated IMO.
you should write Movie name in the description.
Seems like things would have gone a lot better if she started each encounter by showing him the bracelet.
Title name: predestination 🕡
hello friends, don't forget to stop by, we also make a short video!
When movies deliberately forgot to show us real terrorists because they're afraid of getting stabbed to death.
Whats the name of the movie
After seeing many of your recaps, this one.... I wanna see 👍👏👏👏👏👍👀 👀.
Wow... looks interesting enough to give this movie a try... and the plot is intriguing enough (for me at least...) . Thanks for the recap! 👍
So basically "the unibomber" ends up getting a bunch of crazies to start a civil war?
The progressives have now infected scifi. Now all we can have are girl power and white people are racists plots...both unrealistic, over used, and excruciatingly uninteresting.
Well the actual “Unibomber” wasn’t racially motivated, but yeah
@@Drew791 Well there wasn't a whole lot of detail in this video about the motivations of said terrorist. But honestly, if I had to make a guess I wouldn't say it was probably more politically motivated than racial.
Movie :In the Shadow of the Moon
brain chunks and 3 piercings, just another Saturday night in LA.
TH-cam is cracking down on computer generated voices they don't get ad revenue. That's why these movie recap channels are switching to human voices.......
Seven years later?!
I love this movie and hate it at the same time.
Lemme splain: Im from Philly, that hospital at the end is impossible to have here.
No mention of the 4 basic food groups at ANY time; Cheesesteak, hoagie, pretzels or water ice. 😒🤣🤣
also, was unrealistic to see philly without gun-fire and flash mobs looting
@@lothre There IS shootin in the movie! 😒
@@mylove616 my bad, 1 out or 2 aint bad.
@@lothre 🤣🤣🤣🤣
A good movie. Saw it on netflix, enjoyed it thoroughly.
Isn't it lame to watch on netflix?
@@Nakilon ask the one whose subscription I'm using.
The saddest part in the end was that he knew he was the one that killed his own granddaughter.
What? 😂 He's holding her as baby in the last scene of the film. He doesn't kill her. He's the one who eventually sends her on the mission in the 1st place once she is grown. lol
@@KabbalahSherry and thats what leads to her death
Hollywood: We need our 400th movie of 80lb girls can destroy 200lb trained men and white people are racists, but different. What have got?
Writers: Time travel?
Hollywood: Fantastic!
It's so boring at this point...
Love how you weirdos keep lowering the weight of women and increasing the weight of men every time you complain about this. Can’t wait until you say women are 20 pounds and men are 500.
What I’m the living hell is an “identicate”
"she was a nobody" because her prints and name aren't in a criminal system? Lol
I'm sure they ran her prints through different databases
@@KimBlaQue it's only US and other least civilised countries that have fingerprints database for everyone. In more civilised like Russia you have only fingerprints of those who ever reached the police department.
@@KimBlaQue What database, government doesn't have fingerprints of everyone.
@@artimuos903 .....which makes them a nobody according to the database
Wait. If he can't be stopped from killing her because the past can't be changed, how can she go into the past to kill people to change things?
This movie disgusts me.
such a great movie. teared up at the end. "in the shadow if the moon"
🤦🏾
They're wrong for putting that wig on Bokeem
So the year she was born was actually her first time travel hop, she went back in time again for the second time where she ended up killing the partner and the final time she hops back is when she’s actually killed by the main cop. The story is set in stone, we are just seeing it from the perspective of the main cop leading to the events of what happened. This is why he can’t save her, because the him that sees her is from the past, a past that doesn’t even know she exists, if he doesn’t kill her then everything else in the future would cease to exist. Him killing her is what causes her to exist.
So basically she fails.
Cuz if she had succeeded, there wouldn't be a reason for her to jump back.
But if she doesn't jump back, then the events happen and she has to jump back.
An endless loop.
@@bugwar5545 She actually succeeded, the story we watch is the first loop. She went back to kill certain people and she was successful in killing these people, this lead to her grandpa searching for her and hunting her down killing her (start of movie). In the 3 time jumps she did, she managed to kill the people she had to to stop the war
@@r3a1itygamezz14 If she stopped the war before it took place, then when it became time for her to jump back, she wouldn't know about a war that did not occur.
If she didn't know that it happened, why would she jump back to prevent something that never occurred?
@@bugwar5545 So basically, a paradox is a never ending loop. She doesn’t exist without the war and the war doesn’t exist without her. What we watch in this movie is the first loop in the time travel sequence but the second time of the timeline being shown, we never see the world that leads to the war existing. This girl was tasked with going back and killing certain people to prevent a war, in the first play of the timeline these people were never killed and responsible for the war, she now time travels to kill these people, she succeeds however is killed on her final trip back in time. The timeline that she existed in is now completely different to the one watched in this movie because there wasn’t a time traveler initially in the first timeline. She only can exist if she dies because she goes further and further back in time before her “actual” existence, that’s assuming it’s a multiverse though
@@r3a1itygamezz14 "...but the second time of the timeline being shown, we never see the world that leads to the war existing. "
So in the 'second time', she grows up never seeing the events that cause her to jump back to prevent them. Because she doesn't jump, the events that caused the war proceed without hindrance.
The war happens. The universe is stuck in two loops, each causing the other, and repeating forever.
You should add the name of the movies to the description
In the Shadow of the Moon
I'm just here to Observe
Because that's my name....
Movie title: In the Shadow of the Moon (2019)
I smell a paradox in there somwhere.
This recap is more interesting than the whole movie lmao
Michael C. Hall looks somewhat cartoonish in this movie
why does serial killer movies are always the good movie
damn thats in 2 years
Interesting coincidence as the MAGA cult promised to start a civil war in 2024....
TYCER, why did u put wood not plank in the furnace 14:51
all i see is DEXTER, when a actor does such a goodjob you only see him as the character hes most known for
no offense to the voiceover, but the original voice and music were magic.
She says that you can't change the past. Which is why she changes the future