Amanda…I am beyond grateful for finding your channel. I’ve recently started a new job and since I came directly from University it was difficult for me to grasp this. You helped a lot!! Thank you so much! Just got a new sub. ♥️
Yesterday I got my marks for auditing and they were depressing. Today I stumbled upon this channel and all I can say is that am gonna pass this semester. All the stuff that I learnt in semester one are on your channel 😭❤️
I just found your channel. Amanda you are the best. I have an exam in 3 days and you're God sent. They are very short and sweet and very informative. Amanda ILYSM
@@amandalovestoaudit It went really well, the result will be out in a couple of days, I want to thank you again, though there were some issues I had in my exams which I'd like to discuss with you if you will be so kind to let me know where we can talk ? Bunch of thanks again !
Test of internal control for bank rec rests upon 'division of duties.' The person who inputs the entries onto the cash journal must be different from the one who performs the bank rec. The latter puts his signature on the bank rec. Usually does not involve the financial controller.
I think it depends on the scenario given, if your scenario says a busi eases Internal control is that the financial controller or financial manager reviews and authorized the bank rec Then the TOC for the auditor would be to inspect on a sample basis for a 12 month period that the signature/authorization is infact theres I think that's why Amanda mentioned "financial controller" which wasnt wrong Brilliant job Amanda CA 👏🏻
TOCs = check if controls prevent or minimise material mistatement, but does not check financial figures.. STs = tests evidence for the balances and transactions
Thank you so much for creating these wonderful videos! You explain the subject so well. It's amazing that these high-quality videos are freely available.
I also love audit but I need someone to explain it with practical application Which I liked the most in this video This is the first video I have watched on your channel And I loved it Looking for more practical based videos.❤️
This is great for anyone who’s about to sit their CISA exam. I love audits too, but from an IT perspective. Your videos are a dream come true for all of us who are learning to differentiate between various financial controls, as we need to understand them very well in order to pass CISA
Hi Kane! Welcome! And good luck - I visited Singapore back in December and it was amazing (though I have not had any luck replicating the Singaporean hainanese chicken - I'll keep trying)
Failed my advanced audit CPA exam ireland in April... resitting in 4 weeks...this is just what I need... cuts through the waffe... straight to the point... clear and precise... will be checking out other areas on this channel 🙏👍
In my opinion in many cases you have to do two tests: (1) are controls design in a way that meet control objectives which usually also means re-performing the check activity (2) are IC working in a way that were design. If you miss the step (1) then you can conclude that IC are working OK but inf fact the design has such significant weaknesses that control objectives are not obtained and also our financial statement objectives are not met. Also if you get bad results from re-performing of controls, so material differences, then you have to conclude, that control may have significiant or material weakness. So in my opinion there is difference in testing of controls and substantive testing in theory but if you want to achieve meaningful results with internal control testing you have to do both and both results give you significance of IC deficiency.
Yes - this is exactly what I state in the video. You test controls only AFTER you evaluate their design and deem the CR to be Low or Moderate. I wouldn’t call the review of the client ICS (internal control system) a test - but rather an evaluation.
What is the linkage between the control objectives and the test of controls and could you provide an example that would help me understand the linkage between the two?❤️ please and thank you.
Thanks for the video. I now fully understand the concept. I have ACCA, Audit and Assurance exam coming up. My tutors are idiots compared to your explanation. You've got yourself a fan here in the UK.
Thanks TJ! Be sure to provide your institution with some constructive feedback if they have the anonymous evaluation surveys - they can’t improve if they don’t know 😊
I have a question for you. When you identify internal controls in accounting, would that mean you would need to focus on substantive controls, to ascertain how weak internal controls are, and how to ultimately mitigate those weak internal controls??
hi. at 7:58 you mention re performance as an example of a substantive test. however in another video you mentioned reperformance is only for internal control testing. so i am slightly confused
Amanda, which one of these is substantive test procedure: 1. Use of generalized audit software to verify total of accounts receivable file 2. Test of invoice calculation process
Hi Masis - yes it is ☺️ processes are the same, but the auditing standards have a different structure in the US (they are I think the only country not following the international standards)
Hello You have a gift. This has always been a rather hazy area for me but with your examples it has become much clearer. Do you have further examples of these two, possibly in a document form or can you point me to a website where l can access them. They would be very useful. Talking of which could you do something along the lines of internal controls.
Hi bobo jo - there are other videos on my channel. They are all organised here in my study guide - amandalovestoaudit.com/learning-resources/audit-study-guide/gathering-audit-evidence/ Hope this helps!
Great video! But quick question. So if you're performing a Dual Purpose Test, how does this affect the initial Detection Risk you've set to pull your sample? My understanding is that an auditor initially tests controls in order to determine the number of samples the auditor needs for substantive testing. (Solid controls, less samples. Weak controls, more samples.) But if the controls and substantive tests are being done at the same time, then it seems our sample is no longer based on our assessment of internal controls, since those controls haven't been tested yet?
A fab question - when you conduct a dual purpose test - the substantive part won’t be the only test you conduct substantively. So essentially you’ll conduct the dual purpose. Then based on your findings of the control & substantive test you’ve just done - you can adjust future procedures based on what you’ve found as the results ☺️ Does that make sense?
@@amandalovestoaudit Hi Amanda, thank you for responding. And it does! But just to give an example... So let's say I want to test payroll. And the audit universe is 500 employees for the year. If I want to pull a sample, initially I would have considered the strength of the organization's controls over payroll before I pulled the sample. And if there were strong controls, a lower sample, and weak controls, a higher sample. And this is what I would base my variable sampling on to perform substantive testing. But with dual purpose testing, I haven't tested controls yet...since that testing will now be part of my substantive testing. So I'm curious, what is my payroll sample based on for dual purpose testing, if I haven't done control testing yet? Or (based on you saying "you can adjust future procedures based on what you've found as the results.") am I pulling an initial, smaller sample for dual purpose testing over payroll...and then pulling a larger sample for payroll based on the results of the initial dual purpose test? Thanks again!
I have a doubt Amanda, when it comes to test the Design of the Control during Sox's walktrough what the appropiate test approach is? Substantive, controls test or dual? Nice vid btw
Hi! For SOX s404 - you walk through the process to understand the DESIGN of the controls. Then you’ll need to TEST them to see if any material deficiencies exist. Sometimes that testing might mean you’re doing a dual purpose - it just depends on the specific control.
So ma'am we can say in TOC we are testing control activities and efficiency and effectiveness of a control and while in substantive procedures we are testing assertions at transaction level. Is that correct to differentiate
Dear Dr Amanda, I am having difficulty understanding TOD/ test of details, Substantive analytical procedures (SAP) and analytical procedures. Wouldnt SAP and TOD have a dual purpose as well. As TOD requires direct evidence on items that adds to the amount presented on the financial statements and are used as evidence to detect misstatements at the assertions level wouldnt SAP and Analytical procedures do the same?
Hi Ananta - yes - you're right - all of these different types of tests feed into one another - and TOD will help you get to tests of balances. I prefer to think about designing procedures in a way that is focused on finding the best procedure (substantively) for the assertion - which might be a SAP, TOD or TOB :)
In sample words, substantive procedure used to test the figures in financial statement like recalculte cash rec in her example ,, test of control used to test effectiveness of control like signature in her example - always stick to the basic and you should be fine.
thanks in a million amanda. i love the way you breakdown your explanation. i'm elated that i subscribed to your channel. this is the pathway to my success in audit and internal control field. have worked as an internal control personnel in an FMCG company for 9yrs but the control we do is not detailed i believe i will learn alot on your channel and improve my skills in the field of audit.
New Subscriber here. I do love your lectures, it's more understandable. Could you do a video of Audit sampling and using statistical approach or stratification to come to a conclusion.
Hi Amanda, Can you make a video that goes over the reliable evidence i.e of importance like can the auditor use an email, contract, bank statement, etc. to rely on. I know that the auditors own personal knowledge is higher and then outside sources versus externally generated documents. But does an email count as a source document?
Hi Jerzy - think about signing a cheque/check. Your signature is meant to be a control - the bank should make sure it matches the signature on file before releasing the funds you’re sending to someone. That same principle applies to testing a control - eg someone approves something with their signature.
Good Evening Madam Mam can you tell me if there is a difference between Analytical Procedures and Substantive Analytical Procedures ? If there is then what is it.
Like your video, may I ask is the audit related to the Canadian or American audit pls, bcz I'm studying CPA in Canada, so i wanna know if your videos are relevant or not. Thank you!
Hi Yvonne - the foundations of auditing are the same around the world - so definitely relevant if you are in the USA/Canada. Canada also follows the International Standards on Auditing (not the US standards) - so my series working through each ISA is useful sa well 😊
I have been a member of many audit engagement teams and i can relate the concepts with what i have done while performing audit. I must say that you have indepth conceptual clarity. Thank you so much for making crystal clear the auditing concepts.
I enjoy your videos due to the clear explanation and high production value. A couple of small additions I’d like to make are: - a signature is not sufficient evidence for especially a review control. We also need to evaluate the precision of the control. How does one know that it wasn’t just rubber stamping by someone with their eyes closed. - when testing an automated control recalculating isn’t sufficient. We should evaluate that the system is programmed and configured correctly. Of course it is always easier to comment on something.
explanation is theoretically just like that. But I have a feeling the existence of just a signature is not sufficient evidence of effective operation of controls. Some one may sign it without putting much effort thinking job has been done right by subordinate or plain carelessness.
That is absolutely true Mehran - I once came across a client where all of the bank recs were signed in exactly the same spot, in the same colour pen. Turns out they checked & signed them all just before we arrived 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
I think amanda may be ( may be) incorerct here when she says that " reperformance" is a substantive process... I am reading audit for US CPA and in my gliem maerial; I have an MCQ which says that "reperformance" is a type of internal control.
Reperfomance basically means auditor repeating an activity or process that the clients has been performed in the internal control process of the entity I hope this helps you understand
Hello Dr. Amanda, is reperformance part of Substantive testing or it is only applicable for Test of Controls? I am confused, I have read 2 books and the authors have conflicting view regarding this. Thanks ahead. 😊
Hi Cindrelle- a great question! I would normally put reperformance in the substantive category. That is because if you have a control - there should be evidence that it was performed - eg a signature. So a test of a control should be looking for evidence it was conducted - not re-performing it. (Eg re-performing the bank is substantive) That said, if you have a computer system that is meant to prevent certain actions - you can “reperform” those controls. Eg try and access a large discount or change a price. Does that help?
@@amandalovestoaudit Yep, thanks! Therefore, I conclude that all of these (confirmation, inspection, recalculcation, reperformance, Analytical procedures and Inquiry) could be part of substantive testing?
I’m not fussed - as long as you’re learning! Some students prefer to call me Dr Amanda, others just Amanda, others Dr White - whatever you’re comfortable with 😊
You explained things I hadn't understood in class in 2 hours in less than 15 mins!! Thank you so much!!
You’re so welcome!
Amanda…I am beyond grateful for finding your channel. I’ve recently started a new job and since I came directly from University it was difficult for me to grasp this. You helped a lot!! Thank you so much! Just got a new sub. ♥️
Yesterday I got my marks for auditing and they were depressing. Today I stumbled upon this channel and all I can say is that am gonna pass this semester. All the stuff that I learnt in semester one are on your channel 😭❤️
I just found your channel. Amanda you are the best. I have an exam in 3 days and you're God sent. They are very short and sweet and very informative. Amanda ILYSM
Good luck with your exam! Please do come back and tell me how it went 😊
I can definitely relate 😋 I've got 3 days left too 😂
Thanks for your amazing work 😊
After going through so much theory and getting frustrated over it all, it took just over 10 mins to get everything sorted, huge thanks to you Ma'am !
You’re very welcome! Best of luck in your exams!
@@amandalovestoaudit It went really well, the result will be out in a couple of days, I want to thank you again, though there were some issues I had in my exams which I'd like to discuss with you if you will be so kind to let me know where we can talk ? Bunch of thanks again !
I loooooove the bank rec example! When you mentioned about the signature = goosebumps!
You are the best person that explains auditing!!! For real keep going
Thank you so much Sousan ☺️
Exactly the kind of channel i was after for my ACCA - Audit preps. Easy to understand videos. Thanks for for the resources.
Glad to help - we need more accountants in the world!
Test of internal control for bank rec rests upon 'division of duties.' The person who inputs the entries onto the cash journal must be different from the one who performs the bank rec. The latter puts his signature on the bank rec. Usually does not involve the financial controller.
That is a great example - thanks for sharing :)
I think it depends on the scenario given, if your scenario says a busi eases Internal control is that the financial controller or financial manager reviews and authorized the bank rec
Then the TOC for the auditor would be to inspect on a sample basis for a 12 month period that the signature/authorization is infact theres
I think that's why Amanda mentioned "financial controller" which wasnt wrong
Brilliant job Amanda CA 👏🏻
Marvelous Amnada👏🏽, I learned so much in a short space of time
TOCs = check if controls prevent or minimise material mistatement, but does not check financial figures..
STs = tests evidence for the balances and transactions
You’ve got it 💪
Your teaching style is awesome... Making a theoretical subject so easy to remember
That is so good to hear! Thank you for watching!
Thank you so much for creating these wonderful videos! You explain the subject so well. It's amazing that these high-quality videos are freely available.
You're very welcome!
I also love audit but I need someone to explain it with practical application
Which I liked the most in this video
This is the first video I have watched on your channel
And I loved it
Looking for more practical based videos.❤️
Definitely check out my audit study guide for more examples ☺️
amandalovestoaudit.com/learning-resources/audit-study-guide/
Goodness! This is the best. Very easy to understand. Superbly informative. Thank you Dr. A!
Glad it was helpful! 😊
My college professor could not explain this concept well. This video made total sense.
Thank you Donta! 💖
AmandaLovesToAudit Thank you! 😊
This is great for anyone who’s about to sit their CISA exam. I love audits too, but from an IT perspective. Your videos are a dream come true for all of us who are learning to differentiate between various financial controls, as we need to understand them very well in order to pass CISA
New subscriber from Singapore. Im taking ACCA Audit paper. You explained it better than my current tutor! Thank you!
Hi Kane! Welcome! And good luck - I visited Singapore back in December and it was amazing (though I have not had any luck replicating the Singaporean hainanese chicken - I'll keep trying)
Wow, wow wow..
Now I throughly understand the difference between internal control and substantive test.Please keep up your good work👍👍
That is so good to hear - it can be very confusing at first ☺️
This is way better than my audit textbook. Thanks so much!
Again I love your teaching method
Many thanks Kapil!
Thank you very for this video, it cleared how i can approach planning my audits.
From PNG ❤
That is great news! Waving 👋 hi from Australia 🇦🇺
Failed my advanced audit CPA exam ireland in April... resitting in 4 weeks...this is just what I need... cuts through the waffe... straight to the point... clear and precise... will be checking out other areas on this channel 🙏👍
Thank you - there are plenty of resources in my study guide - bit.ly/studyaudit - good luck!
Amanda , I really love ur work .u r amazing with ur teaching styles nd skills.
Thank you so much!
I'm preparing a graduation thesis and this was useful , thanks a lot
You’re welcome!
Thank you!. I am preparing for CISA and your videos are helping me much. 👌
You’re welcome Sumeet - good luck in your exam 💪
@@amandalovestoaudit thank you! 👍
Amanda mam thanks for clarifying the difference.Thanks a lot again.
Extremely useful video which has cleared my confusion....Thanks a lot Madam..Stay blessed
Super awesome! the concept is crystal clear Ma'am.
In my opinion in many cases you have to do two tests: (1) are controls design in a way that meet control objectives which usually also means re-performing the check activity (2) are IC working in a way that were design. If you miss the step (1) then you can conclude that IC are working OK but inf fact the design has such significant weaknesses that control objectives are not obtained and also our financial statement objectives are not met. Also if you get bad results from re-performing of controls, so material differences, then you have to conclude, that control may have significiant or material weakness. So in my opinion there is difference in testing of controls and substantive testing in theory but if you want to achieve meaningful results with internal control testing you have to do both and both results give you significance of IC deficiency.
Yes - this is exactly what I state in the video. You test controls only AFTER you evaluate their design and deem the CR to be Low or Moderate.
I wouldn’t call the review of the client ICS (internal control system) a test - but rather an evaluation.
What is the linkage between the control objectives and the test of controls and could you provide an example that would help me understand the linkage between the two?❤️ please and thank you.
Great job... love your way of giving understanding...
Thanks for the video. I now fully understand the concept. I have ACCA, Audit and Assurance exam coming up. My tutors are idiots compared to your explanation. You've got yourself a fan here in the UK.
Thanks TJ! Be sure to provide your institution with some constructive feedback if they have the anonymous evaluation surveys - they can’t improve if they don’t know 😊
I have a question for you. When you identify internal controls in accounting, would that mean you would need to focus on substantive controls, to ascertain how weak internal controls are, and how to ultimately mitigate those weak internal controls??
Thank you very much for your work and videos Dr
They are really helpful
You're so welcome Sergio 😊
HOW IS THIS BETTER THAN THE CLASS I PAY COLD HARD CASH FOR AT UNI????
Sorry about that Matt!
@@amandalovestoaudit No it's great! I was saying this is better than the class I pay for!!!! Thank you for what you do!!
hi. at 7:58 you mention re performance as an example of a substantive test. however in another video you mentioned reperformance is only for internal control testing. so i am slightly confused
I am pursuing chartered accountancy in india , your teaching style is awesome
That is fantastic to hear - the world needs more great accountants - good luck in your exams!
@@amandalovestoaudit i want to become an auditor not Accountant
You explained that with a great example - thanks so much
Very well explained. I was completely lost, but thanks to you, I understood this topic. Thanks for the great job.
This was so easy to understand! Thank you so much!
Amanda, which one of these is substantive test procedure:
1. Use of generalized audit software to verify total of accounts receivable file
2. Test of invoice calculation process
They both are ☺️
you explained it so well.....thank you so much
Thank you 🙏
Thank you so much Amanda!!! It was really helpful
You are so welcome ☺️👍
Yes .. it's really helpful
That's awesome!
very thorough explanation. finally got it!!! thank you ! subscribed
I never knew a price list was considered an internal control. Good tip!
Even things like an envelope with a window for the address can be a control!
Thank you for the explanation!
Amanda is what you teach relevant to Us audits as well
Hi Masis - yes it is ☺️ processes are the same, but the auditing standards have a different structure in the US (they are I think the only country not following the international standards)
Gosh, you've helped me out with this video. Thanks.
Glad I could help!
this is a fantastic topic. thanks Amanda!
Hello
You have a gift. This has always been a rather hazy area for me but with your examples it has become much clearer. Do you have further examples of these two, possibly in a document form or can you point me to a website where l can access them. They would be very useful. Talking of which could you do something along the lines of internal controls.
Hi bobo jo - there are other videos on my channel. They are all organised here in my study guide - amandalovestoaudit.com/learning-resources/audit-study-guide/gathering-audit-evidence/
Hope this helps!
This was sooooo helpful!!!
Thank you so much. l've subscribed to your channel, its really helpful.
Thank you for subscribing 🙏😊
Great video! But quick question. So if you're performing a Dual Purpose Test, how does this affect the initial Detection Risk you've set to pull your sample? My understanding is that an auditor initially tests controls in order to determine the number of samples the auditor needs for substantive testing. (Solid controls, less samples. Weak controls, more samples.) But if the controls and substantive tests are being done at the same time, then it seems our sample is no longer based on our assessment of internal controls, since those controls haven't been tested yet?
A fab question - when you conduct a dual purpose test - the substantive part won’t be the only test you conduct substantively.
So essentially you’ll conduct the dual purpose. Then based on your findings of the control & substantive test you’ve just done - you can adjust future procedures based on what you’ve found as the results ☺️
Does that make sense?
@@amandalovestoaudit Hi Amanda, thank you for responding. And it does! But just to give an example... So let's say I want to test payroll. And the audit universe is 500 employees for the year. If I want to pull a sample, initially I would have considered the strength of the organization's controls over payroll before I pulled the sample. And if there were strong controls, a lower sample, and weak controls, a higher sample. And this is what I would base my variable sampling on to perform substantive testing.
But with dual purpose testing, I haven't tested controls yet...since that testing will now be part of my substantive testing. So I'm curious, what is my payroll sample based on for dual purpose testing, if I haven't done control testing yet?
Or (based on you saying "you can adjust future procedures based on what you've found as the results.") am I pulling an initial, smaller sample for dual purpose testing over payroll...and then pulling a larger sample for payroll based on the results of the initial dual purpose test? Thanks again!
Thank you so much for these videos Amanda, you are doing the Lords work, thank you.
I have a doubt Amanda, when it comes to test the Design of the Control during Sox's walktrough what the appropiate test approach is? Substantive, controls test or dual?
Nice vid btw
Hi! For SOX s404 - you walk through the process to understand the DESIGN of the controls. Then you’ll need to TEST them to see if any material deficiencies exist.
Sometimes that testing might mean you’re doing a dual purpose - it just depends on the specific control.
So ma'am we can say in TOC we are testing control activities and efficiency and effectiveness of a control and while in substantive procedures we are testing assertions at transaction level.
Is that correct to differentiate
Dear Dr Amanda, I am having difficulty understanding TOD/ test of details, Substantive analytical procedures (SAP) and analytical procedures. Wouldnt SAP and TOD have a dual purpose as well. As TOD requires direct evidence on items that adds to the amount presented on the financial statements and are used as evidence to detect misstatements at the assertions level wouldnt SAP and Analytical procedures do the same?
Hi Ananta - yes - you're right - all of these different types of tests feed into one another - and TOD will help you get to tests of balances. I prefer to think about designing procedures in a way that is focused on finding the best procedure (substantively) for the assertion - which might be a SAP, TOD or TOB :)
can you explain about how substantive control and testing control in inventory and warehousing cycle?
In sample words, substantive procedure used to test the figures in financial statement like recalculte cash rec in her example ,, test of control used to test effectiveness of control like signature in her example - always stick to the basic and you should be fine.
Thanks a lot ma'am.
You are most welcome 😊
can you use benfords law to do a test of controls and a substantive analytical procedure?
Really nice explanations
thanks in a million amanda. i love the way you breakdown your explanation. i'm elated that i subscribed to your channel. this is the pathway to my success in audit and internal control field. have worked as an internal control personnel in an FMCG company for 9yrs but the control we do is not detailed i believe i will learn alot on your channel and improve my skills in the field of audit.
Thank you Kanene 🙏☺️
New Subscriber here. I do love your lectures, it's more understandable. Could you do a video of Audit sampling and using statistical approach or stratification to come to a conclusion.
Hi Victor - welcome!
Try this video for sampling
Topic 6 - Sampling
th-cam.com/video/DoiGOpP4nF0/w-d-xo.html
Hi Amanda, Can you make a video that goes over the reliable evidence i.e of importance like can the auditor use an email, contract, bank statement, etc. to rely on. I know that the auditors own personal knowledge is higher and then outside sources versus externally generated documents. But does an email count as a source document?
This is a great suggestion Vatishia and it is rocketing to the top of my list!
Excellent ma'am
Thank you 🙏☺️
This helps
Very clear concept 👌
Thanks Kapil 🙏
Helpful videos
When you are asked to give a test control and substantive test from a website of a certain company what should you give
How is a signature an evidence for the performance of the control?
Hi Jerzy - think about signing a cheque/check. Your signature is meant to be a control - the bank should make sure it matches the signature on file before releasing the funds you’re sending to someone.
That same principle applies to testing a control - eg someone approves something with their signature.
If only I knew your channel sooner. Maybe I aced all my audit subjects huhu
Good Evening Madam
Mam can you tell me if there is a difference between Analytical Procedures and Substantive Analytical Procedures ? If there is then what is it.
Hi Rajat - there is! And I’m planning out a video to answer your question ☺️
@@amandalovestoaudit Ok madam
Like your video, may I ask is the audit related to the Canadian or American audit pls, bcz I'm studying CPA in Canada, so i wanna know if your videos are relevant or not. Thank you!
Hi Yvonne - the foundations of auditing are the same around the world - so definitely relevant if you are in the USA/Canada. Canada also follows the International Standards on Auditing (not the US standards) - so my series working through each ISA is useful sa well 😊
@@amandalovestoaudit thank you so much, that's great that i won't mess up the rules lol.
Thanks so much
Thanks again
You're welcome!
Hi Amanda, how did u put what you're writing in the background... it's an amazing technique for teaching
Hi - it is all editing magic in Adobe Premiere Pro ☺️
@@amandalovestoaudit nice, I'll check it out sometime... am a fan of how you present your work and am sure it is integral thereto
meticulously explained, thanks for sharing the knowledge.
Thanx Amanda
Hi mam,
Myself suman saurav from India pursuing CA. Your videos are great help to me. Thank you so much for these videos. 🌞
I have been a member of many audit engagement teams and i can relate the concepts with what i have done while performing audit. I must say that you have indepth conceptual clarity. Thank you so much for making crystal clear the auditing concepts.
You are so welcome!
Awesome explanation
Thank you ☺️
Would you do videos on specific industries audit? Like construction industry?
Not at this stage - still lots of basic content to cover!
I enjoy your videos due to the clear explanation and high production value.
A couple of small additions I’d like to make are:
- a signature is not sufficient evidence for especially a review control. We also need to evaluate the precision of the control. How does one know that it wasn’t just rubber stamping by someone with their eyes closed.
- when testing an automated control recalculating isn’t sufficient. We should evaluate that the system is programmed and configured correctly.
Of course it is always easier to comment on something.
You are awesome.... just got a new subscriber!
Please could you explain more the difference between substantial testing and control testing
Hi Osman - what part is particularly confusing for you?
Awesome.... Love from India...
Thank you! Hope you are staying safe and well ☺️
Hello watching from the Philippines
Thanks for watching Ira!
explanation is theoretically just like that. But I have a feeling the existence of just a signature is not sufficient evidence of effective operation of controls. Some one may sign it without putting much effort thinking job has been done right by subordinate or plain carelessness.
That is absolutely true Mehran - I once came across a client where all of the bank recs were signed in exactly the same spot, in the same colour pen. Turns out they checked & signed them all just before we arrived 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
@@amandalovestoaudit :)
Loved this❤
What software do you use to visualize the writings on your ipad on the screen?
I think amanda may be ( may be) incorerct here when she says that " reperformance" is a substantive process... I am reading audit for US CPA and in my gliem maerial; I have an MCQ which says that "reperformance" is a type of internal control.
Reperfomance basically means auditor repeating an activity or process that the clients has been performed in the internal control process of the entity
I hope this helps you understand
thank you
Thank you!!
You're so very welcome Martina!
THANK YOU
Thank you for your clear explanation! If you were my lecturer for audit, think i would ace the subject.. haha
Hello Dr. Amanda, is reperformance part of Substantive testing or it is only applicable for Test of Controls? I am confused, I have read 2 books and the authors have conflicting view regarding this. Thanks ahead. 😊
Hi Cindrelle- a great question!
I would normally put reperformance in the substantive category.
That is because if you have a control - there should be evidence that it was performed - eg a signature. So a test of a control should be looking for evidence it was conducted - not re-performing it. (Eg re-performing the bank is substantive)
That said, if you have a computer system that is meant to prevent certain actions - you can “reperform” those controls. Eg try and access a large discount or change a price.
Does that help?
@@amandalovestoaudit Yep, thanks! Therefore, I conclude that all of these (confirmation, inspection, recalculcation, reperformance, Analytical procedures and Inquiry) could be part of substantive testing?
Thank you ms amanda :)
Doctor
I’m not fussed - as long as you’re learning! Some students prefer to call me Dr Amanda, others just Amanda, others Dr White - whatever you’re comfortable with 😊
@@amandalovestoaudit Thanks to this video and your other videos, i managed to get fresh graduate job at big 4 :))). THANK YOU SO MUCH
So tests of controls are a component of test of details?
No - TOCs are different from substantive procedures (of which TODs are one subset)
Thanks alot
Thank you for this! :)) very helpful! :)
You're so welcome Alana!