NATO Secretary General, Press Conference at Defence Ministers Meeting, 16 JUN 2023

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 16

  • @janethompson5153
    @janethompson5153 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Glory, Victory, Peace, and Justice for Ukraine 🇺🇦 🇬🇧

    • @imperijaable
      @imperijaable ปีที่แล้ว

      Indeed. Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦❤️

  • @yeetus1398
    @yeetus1398 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    i love this man.

  • @keith8609
    @keith8609 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The NATO secretary is impressive and is a good guy Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦 🇬🇧

  • @SeRee_PH
    @SeRee_PH ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Bravo! NATO , go go go
    I am fromCanada

  • @johnfaw
    @johnfaw ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Jens needs to stay on for another year

  • @irmanv.9798
    @irmanv.9798 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for the updates General Stoltenberg. Ukraine deserves to become a NATO member! Russia needs to send the soldiers home. Putin is losing! SlavaUkraine HeroyamSlava!

  • @electro_sykes
    @electro_sykes ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Don't Worry Ukraine, Australia has got your back

  • @Chubbzzdadon
    @Chubbzzdadon ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We lOVE NATO

  • @jurgenblick5491
    @jurgenblick5491 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Semper Fi

  • @hapa3819
    @hapa3819 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Certainly Germany has ordered already so many new PzH and Leo2 that Rheinmetall can't keep up ... certainly. To get the Bundeswehr to be able to actually defend Germany and also supply more modern equipment to Ukraine. Zeitenwende and everything, right?

  • @robertezergailis
    @robertezergailis ปีที่แล้ว +2

    We wish we could feel assured that Ukraine can shift its reliance to sufficient range howitzers, mortars and rockets, rather than traditional infantry tactics. Sometimes wishes can come true, but the concern is insufficient heavy guns, as we have been saying all along. That and horrific, extremely tragic, delays in munitions availability. It is a horrible mess, no matter how we look at it, from the supply side, despite the provident nations patting themselves on the back as if all is well on the Ukraine front. It is not and they need to fully realize that. It could be better if the provident powers draw down deeper against their inventories than they have done and are doing. There is that option. Both as to guns and munitions. For instance Canada has quite a lot of M777 guns in its inventory. Ideally they should all go to Ukraine. There is little risk that Canada would have to use them anywhere else within the time frame that it takes for the USA to replace them. That would be another, nearly 100 pieces of 155mm field guns. Alternatively at least half the inventory, perhaps 50 more guns going to where they are really needed right now. Other nations are similarly cagey and stingy. They have things that they are not using, and might never really use, but they do not want to give them up to Ukraine the way they ought to be giving them up, right now. We have to look at it that every additional field gun saves many Ukraine lives. How many is uncertain, but it is many. What are Ukraine lives worth ? Are field gun inventories worth more than those lives ? No, they are not. The guns should be in Ukraine not in inventory. That goes for every provident nation. The guns should be in Ukraine not in inventory.

  • @robinblick9375
    @robinblick9375 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At last...NATO is living up to its obligations.

  • @omarfierros4973
    @omarfierros4973 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nato I love you 💐