Great move. India will save some money with this move. But the main advantage is that Government and its ministers can concentrate on their work without their focus diverting to multiple state's election campaigns. Also will save time of government workers
The politicians will have 5 years of un interrupted time to corrupt, at least now they fear going back to people while seeking votes for different election. People are loosing more power to politicians. Just like demonization you will know there was no money saved after 1 year.
It's not possible in long term . The elections will go out of sync anyway because of fragile mandates and invite unnecessary elections with a shorter team.
So many of the states and loksabha go together and vote differently. Odisha and even AP is the best example. People have voted different parties. The only party that needs to worry is Congress. The other regional parties have seen that historically, it will not impact them.
Not to mention, Now even small regional parties can hope to make it big Nationally !!! No more Domination of National Parties. Next, I hope they cap spending on Election campaigns. It will create a more level playing field.
Great, Now Indian Politicians can plan long-term for 5 whole years when they are in Power. No more distractions like Elections every few months and Campaigning. Hope the Freebies will also end with this.. We are sick and tired of Freebies, I rather have my taxpayer money spent on useful things like Road, Highways and Infra Projects.
It makes no sense to vote for a govt only to find that it's fallen midway and we have to vote again in between for 1-2 year term and then keep repeating the whole thing. No, thanks.
@@surudog4929 you still don't get it, do you? Who'd be interested in voting a govt which is only going to last 1 or 2 years before the main term elections. MLAs themselves would have no incentive to work much in those years except just try to show some quick and dirty results.
How about One Nation Two Elections? Let all states have elections together but at the midpoint point of the national elections. This ensures that campaigning for the two elections are separate but still much less elections than what happens now?
What about those who contest elections from two seats? Would that be banned too as there will definitely be a re-election on one seat? Also, if it is not banned then will they allow one person to contest elections on one lok sabha seat and one vidhan sabha seat at the same time if elections are held simultaneously?
If INC says that with this bill, the BJP will win in both center and state, that means 1. they don't have the confidence that they will even come to power in center and then in states 2. they are disregarding the intellect of the Bhartiya voters considering them as gullible.
As per the Government point of view ONOP will be beneficial to the country. So we should give benefit of doubt to the elected Government, they already told this in their ELECTIONS MANIFESTO and there is a precedence earlier who suggested this at various times and in different Governments. There may be some narrow minded people who bluntly oppose this idea without going to merits. Government should leave them and share more and more information on the bill to public and educate the public on benefits. Then opposition parties have to accept as times goes on. Currently BJP has approximate numbers to pass the bill but it seems they also want to go with concenses of majority of parties to become reality.
Very good analysis Faye. Keep it up. From cost saving angle it may be good idea. But it may end like the big fish eating all the small fishes. Hence the opposition from the regional parties.
but whats the possibility of reelection in state? in five years max only 1 or might be 2 states constituency is dissolved. secondly it will enable voters to choose government who has majority, making political parties rethink on their fundamentals.
By the numbers now it may feel impossible to pass this bill in one of the houses, so I am assuming that they will ask to pass this bill in a joint session and with some Amit Shah magic I think they might just do it, cause one thing I have learned is that this government is highly strategic in their moves and not to doubt them too much when they say that they are going to do something, whether they get the execution right or not is a different issue but they will do it.
8:10 Misinformation: 19 out of 28 States are Governed by the BJP led NDA and Only 8 States are Governed by the I.N.D.I Alliance. And the BJP governs 12 Indian states independently, without coalition partners.
It might be financially efficient only with our politicians working in the interest of people instead of power, well that's IMPOSSIBLE anyway, so they end up playing musical chairs, govt collapses, reforms, ... a political loop Given the uncertainty of our loyal netaas, it'll just become an extra burden to conduct elections such unstable states for minimal terms again and again Great content, lucid explainer!
Its a pure central controlled machinery. Check the case 1: when Legislative assemblies dissolved when house of common dissolves. Fine lets do a re-election. case 2: If EC can't conduct LA election it can defer it, without mentioning for how long and what will happen in that state in that vacuum of no government. case 3: LA can be dissolved on the recommendation on any one grounds of 174(2) it shouts CENTRALIZATION
Whenever govt.falls due to no majority & fresh elections are conducted for remaining period, then the amendment is of no use & it does not serve the purpose. Aftee the govt. falls, the remaing period must be ruled by President or Governor as the case may be. Or else while giving support of other party, it should give for the full period of five years.
and how exactly can bjp achieve that? you think people are stoopid that they wont chose a different party at centre as well as state? people know to distinguish between which party to vote at centre and state
and how exactly is bjp becoming that? you think people are stoopid that they wont chose a different party at centre as well as state? people know to distinguish between which party to vote at centre and state
You have not spoken about the insettion of 82A which decides an appointed date by a notification issued by the president on the first sitting of Loksabha which literally explains when the ONOE comes into effect.
If this goes through, local state issues will take a backseat as against national agenda and national parties would have a leeway to introduce any sort of Tom/Dick/harry candidates for state assembly seats.
It's only a humbag. Only to divert the Adani issue, the Jalsa Party had introduced the one nation bill. The govt isnot at all in the interest of the people. It's acting against the existing laws. If they do not acceptable for its agenda, then it's trying to amend those laws. God alone can save this country.
This is a horrible thing for our nation & it should not happen at any cost. Let's hope this govt doesn't officially change our democracy to dictatorship. Unofficially we are already in a dictatorship rule sadly.
@@surudog4929this is a top to bottom approach which is always bad for democracy we need bottom to top approach for development people to vote on the local issues not just voting right voting is also had in North Korea too so is that a democracy
@ how is voting 1 time in 5 years bad? You vote for Lok Sabha, state assembly and any other local bill that is on the ballot. this is how it happens in US or happened at the time of India’s independence. What is that you ‘lose’ by voting once in 5 years vs what you have today?
Great move.
India will save some money with this move.
But the main advantage is that Government and its ministers can concentrate on their work without their focus diverting to multiple state's election campaigns. Also will save time of government workers
🤣🤣🤣
The politicians will have 5 years of un interrupted time to corrupt, at least now they fear going back to people while seeking votes for different election.
People are loosing more power to politicians.
Just like demonization you will know there was no money saved after 1 year.
It's not possible in long term . The elections will go out of sync anyway because of fragile mandates and invite unnecessary elections with a shorter team.
We need this to improve our productivity as nation. We don't want to be in election mode all the time.
we need this
We need ONOP, no matter what any biased journalist (Faye) says!
This young intellectual journalist is the coolest🫰
So many of the states and loksabha go together and vote differently. Odisha and even AP is the best example. People have voted different parties. The only party that needs to worry is Congress. The other regional parties have seen that historically, it will not impact them.
Exactly. Why can't people understand this simple concept i don't understand.
@@nikhilbhute07Because they dont want to understand. They dont want bjp to do anything good for the country's economic progress
Not to mention, Now even small regional parties can hope to make it big Nationally !!! No more Domination of National Parties. Next, I hope they cap spending on Election campaigns. It will create a more level playing field.
On the face of it - it looks logical just like Demonetization & GST did... post that we know how it all went
👏🏻👏🏻
This govt cant think 😢
May the force be with you Faye
Even if the voting and election seems complicated, the counting would be pretty easy with the EVM... 😅
Great, Now Indian Politicians can plan long-term for 5 whole years when they are in Power. No more distractions like Elections every few months and Campaigning. Hope the Freebies will also end with this.. We are sick and tired of Freebies, I rather have my taxpayer money spent on useful things like Road, Highways and Infra Projects.
We need this urgently. It makes no sense to have ANY election within a 5 year window.
It makes no sense to vote for a govt only to find that it's fallen midway and we have to vote again in between for 1-2 year term and then keep repeating the whole thing. No, thanks.
@ so you do agree we should vote 1 time in 5 years. Right?
@@surudog4929 you still don't get it, do you? Who'd be interested in voting a govt which is only going to last 1 or 2 years before the main term elections. MLAs themselves would have no incentive to work much in those years except just try to show some quick and dirty results.
@@7777linpawsIf a state government collapses prior to the 5 year term. Presidential rule would need to be imposed
This will save so much money and some people will do actual work more than become a so called karyakartas 😂
That was a very lucid explanation, Faye. Keep it up. Love, Alice
How about One Nation Two Elections? Let all states have elections together but at the midpoint point of the national elections. This ensures that campaigning for the two elections are separate but still much less elections than what happens now?
No transition is easy. A closed mind finds everything daunting and will throw endless arguments.
What about those who contest elections from two seats? Would that be banned too as there will definitely be a re-election on one seat? Also, if it is not banned then will they allow one person to contest elections on one lok sabha seat and one vidhan sabha seat at the same time if elections are held simultaneously?
If INC says that with this bill, the BJP will win in both center and state, that means 1. they don't have the confidence that they will even come to power in center and then in states 2. they are disregarding the intellect of the Bhartiya voters considering them as gullible.
This is probably a long term strategy to get a greater majority next time around, and maybe win a few more states in the process
Sounds like no one is against this, everyone thinks its necessary but opposition is opposing it for the sake of opposing
Modi govt’s track record with implementation has been very bad. Be it GST or demonetisation.
It will be a good thing
As per the Government point of view ONOP will be beneficial to the country. So we should give benefit of doubt to the elected Government, they already told this in their ELECTIONS MANIFESTO and there is a precedence earlier who suggested this at various times and in different Governments. There may be some narrow minded people who bluntly oppose this idea without going to merits. Government should leave them and share more and more information on the bill to public and educate the public on benefits. Then opposition parties have to accept as times goes on. Currently BJP has approximate numbers to pass the bill but it seems they also want to go with concenses of majority of parties to become reality.
I ❤ ur star war t shirt
Very good analysis Faye. Keep it up. From cost saving angle it may be good idea. But it may end like the big fish eating all the small fishes. Hence the opposition from the regional parties.
but whats the possibility of reelection in state? in five years max only 1 or might be 2 states constituency is dissolved. secondly it will enable voters to choose government who has majority, making political parties rethink on their fundamentals.
By the numbers now it may feel impossible to pass this bill in one of the houses, so I am assuming that they will ask to pass this bill in a joint session and with some Amit Shah magic I think they might just do it, cause one thing I have learned is that this government is highly strategic in their moves and not to doubt them too much when they say that they are going to do something, whether they get the execution right or not is a different issue but they will do it.
I'm not supporter of any party. One nation One election seems logical. Central power will not hv any influence towards local elections..
8:10 Misinformation: 19 out of 28 States are Governed by the BJP led NDA and Only 8 States are Governed by the I.N.D.I Alliance. And the BJP governs 12 Indian states independently, without coalition partners.
Soros funds these kind of misinformation
sounds like a good idea to me. But time will tell if this is a good change or a bad one.
It might be financially efficient only with our politicians working in the interest of people instead of power, well that's IMPOSSIBLE anyway, so they end up playing musical chairs, govt collapses, reforms, ... a political loop
Given the uncertainty of our loyal netaas, it'll just become an extra burden to conduct elections such unstable states for minimal terms again and again
Great content, lucid explainer!
Its a pure central controlled machinery. Check the
case 1: when Legislative assemblies dissolved when house of common dissolves. Fine lets do a re-election.
case 2: If EC can't conduct LA election it can defer it, without mentioning for how long and what will happen in that state in that vacuum of no government.
case 3: LA can be dissolved on the recommendation on any one grounds of 174(2)
it shouts CENTRALIZATION
It's not a good idea (ONOE).
Whenever govt.falls due to no majority & fresh elections are conducted for remaining period, then the amendment is of no use & it does not serve the purpose. Aftee the govt. falls, the remaing period must be ruled by President or Governor as the case may be. Or else while giving support of other party, it should give for the full period of five years.
First electoral reforms have to be done.
Views seem biased towards opposing the change.
Electoral reforms could have been thought of as a priority.
India needs ONOE asap.
Efficiency ....who decides about efficiency.... the center or the states. In Hitler's Germany he sat in Berlin and decided about Germany's efficiency.
In fdrs america, he sat in Washington and decided americas efficiency
In churchhills uk, he sat in london and decided uks efficiency
Have some sanity.... don't draw parallels to Roosevelt's America & Churchill's Britain to Hitler's Germany.
The nature of Modi government is impliment first plan second
It would bring good and bad things together, but i think BJP wants centre and states govt power in their hands at the same time like nehru did.
and how exactly can bjp achieve that? you think people are stoopid that they wont chose a different party at centre as well as state?
people know to distinguish between which party to vote at centre and state
Bjp always rigs the evm this will be very convenient for them
Wow girl! The camera quality is really good!! Happy you getting the equipment you need!!
Next step: green screen! 😄
BJP be pulling a Nehru rn. Becoming the same thing they hated.
Bjp is becoming all inclusive and democratic? Since when
and how exactly is bjp becoming that? you think people are stoopid that they wont chose a different party at centre as well as state?
people know to distinguish between which party to vote at centre and state
You have not spoken about the insettion of 82A which decides an appointed date by a notification issued by the president on the first sitting of Loksabha which literally explains when the ONOE comes into effect.
S to deflect attention
If this goes through, local state issues will take a backseat as against national agenda and national parties would have a leeway to introduce any sort of Tom/Dick/harry candidates for state assembly seats.
It's only a humbag. Only to divert the Adani issue, the Jalsa Party had introduced the one nation bill. The govt isnot at all in the interest of the people. It's acting against the existing laws. If they do not acceptable for its agenda, then it's trying to amend those laws. God alone can save this country.
Ok so where’s the proof and evidence regarding the adani. Why dosent the USA give the evidence if they claiming so big
You look slimmer in the thumbnail... but in actuality you are not....take care
This is a horrible thing for our nation & it should not happen at any cost. Let's hope this govt doesn't officially change our democracy to dictatorship. Unofficially we are already in a dictatorship rule sadly.
Why? You have the same right to vote and choose your leaders. Why is this ‘horrible’?
@@surudog4929this is a top to bottom approach which is always bad for democracy we need bottom to top approach for development people to vote on the local issues not just voting right voting is also had in North Korea too so is that a democracy
@ how is voting 1 time in 5 years bad? You vote for Lok Sabha, state assembly and any other local bill that is on the ballot. this is how it happens in US or happened at the time of India’s independence.
What is that you ‘lose’ by voting once in 5 years vs what you have today?
Just because the party you vote doesnt win, its not dictatorship
🤣
काँग्रेस is no more
Again a biased news - this is a great initiative by govt
You are biased in your thoughts. At times, it appears "rubbish"