According to the American Constitution, the same person cannot be elected twice as the president for more than two consecutive terms. Moreover, there two consecutive terms is 8 years as compared to India's 10 years. Imagine the same incumbency for another 5years!!🙄🙄🥱🥱
and the people also generally vote for different part in every few elections even though they only have 2 real options, they don't support incumbency, here for some reason once a party comes it we just keep voting the sane party over and over for many years
Great move. India will save some money with this move. But the main advantage is that Government and its ministers can concentrate on their work without their focus diverting to multiple state's election campaigns. Also will save time of government workers
The politicians will have 5 years of un interrupted time to corrupt, at least now they fear going back to people while seeking votes for different election. People are loosing more power to politicians. Just like demonization you will know there was no money saved after 1 year.
It's not possible in long term . The elections will go out of sync anyway because of fragile mandates and invite unnecessary elections with a shorter team.
@@rgrm104 you are talking as if government getting dissolved before term in common thing in india. there will be one or two incidents in 5 years, can keep separate elections for them if required. still the amount of money saved as well as the productivity added because of lesser time consumed for elections will far outweigh the demerits
Nothing happens in India on time. If it did we would've been developed by now. Look at China. One nation one election will cause the problems of the states be overlooked by national problems. Each state has its own unique problems. At least with different elections the state government can be held accountable. And one election means people are more likely to vote for the same party in both state and general elections. That's a big problem. It allows a single party to become dominant and they aren't accountable to anyone. Our politicians work only during elections. After that they disappear. Or they cause religious and communal violence. This bill will just strengthen the whole thing. Look at both sides of coin.
How about One Nation Two Elections? Let all states have elections together but at the midpoint point of the national elections. This ensures that campaigning for the two elections are separate but still much less elections than what happens now?
By the numbers now it may feel impossible to pass this bill in one of the houses, so I am assuming that they will ask to pass this bill in a joint session and with some Amit Shah magic I think they might just do it, cause one thing I have learned is that this government is highly strategic in their moves and not to doubt them too much when they say that they are going to do something, whether they get the execution right or not is a different issue but they will do it.
Thanks for pointing that out, my bad. Still wouldn’t count it out just yet because I know the Modi and Amit Shah since I was barely 1 year old (I am a Gujarati), they just that knack to win crucial battles, they might pull it off somehow (Politics n’ all).
There should be two seperate election for a tenure of 4 or 5 years. Loksabha election and after 2 and half years all state assembly election. So that people will not be confused.
@Spc_1996 But it's not same. Now assembly elections are held every year for one or the other state. So small change is all states assembly elections should be conducted at once. It's not about reduction in cost but about maintaining the democracy and fair election. Am not sure if you have experience in voting MP and MLA vote same day. There is so much confusion inside the booth. Sometimes MP vote you want to vote for X party but you end up voting for Y party. The same way MLA vote you want to vote for Y party but you end up voting for X party. There is so many such issues.
@@kumarp7438 i dont think the people going to vote are that stoopid that they dont know whch party to vote for in the centre and state. maybe 1% of the population might be facing issue (especially people who are above 75+ years old) but on the positive side, it will promote a lot of people to go and vote especially those who work in neighbouring states etc as they will get leave without applying. also people will feel there is a much higher need to go and vote that day because of higher responsibility
@Spc_1996 it's not about stupidity but about education. Well educated people not many of them go out to vote. Rural voter turnout is more than the urban voter turnout. Rural people are not much educated compared to urban. So they can be confused while voting if MP and MLA election is conducted together and this is happening. Even 1% vote is more than enough for a different result.
@@kumarp7438 I know the significance of 1% vote difference bro. But as i said, the advantages far outweights the disadvantages. And the advantages are in terms of numbers (quantitative) . we know howbthe government focus on growth reduced because of election for 1 quarter and because of which our GDP slowed down for a quarter. The same effect can happen in states as well. If we club them, the lesser the impact. Also we can quantity how much there will be cost reduction because of simultaneous elections. And the disadvantages are qualitative. Its "MAYBEs" which might or might not be true.
@@Interstellar2123 true bro. leftists will oppose anything ad everything brought by the NDA govt. because they don't want nda to bring any value to the country
It is an absolutely horrendous, premonition igniting, insidious idea. Decentralization at the hands of the government will influence results. There are 100s of discussions about this.
and how exactly can bjp achieve that? you think people are stoopid that they wont chose a different party at centre as well as state? people know to distinguish between which party to vote at centre and state
So many of the states and loksabha go together and vote differently. Odisha and even AP is the best example. People have voted different parties. The only party that needs to worry is Congress. The other regional parties have seen that historically, it will not impact them.
Not to mention, Now even small regional parties can hope to make it big Nationally !!! No more Domination of National Parties. Next, I hope they cap spending on Election campaigns. It will create a more level playing field.
What about those who contest elections from two seats? Would that be banned too as there will definitely be a re-election on one seat? Also, if it is not banned then will they allow one person to contest elections on one lok sabha seat and one vidhan sabha seat at the same time if elections are held simultaneously?
but whats the possibility of reelection in state? in five years max only 1 or might be 2 states constituency is dissolved. secondly it will enable voters to choose government who has majority, making political parties rethink on their fundamentals.
Great, Now Indian Politicians can plan long-term for 5 whole years when they are in Power. No more distractions like Elections every few months and Campaigning. Hope the Freebies will also end with this.. We are sick and tired of Freebies, I rather have my taxpayer money spent on useful things like Road, Highways and Infra Projects.
8:10 Misinformation: 19 out of 28 States are Governed by the BJP led NDA and Only 8 States are Governed by the I.N.D.I Alliance. And the BJP governs 12 Indian states independently, without coalition partners.
i'm kinda on the fence for this, in theory it sounds pretty efficient to do ONOE, but there can be issues during the implementation, but if it can work then we should give it a shot
One thing which is pertinent to note here is that for the first time I am seeing the government bringing something on the table which cannot be sold off on emotions or ideology. Sure there have been things like GST which were not ideological or emotional but a step towards better tax structure, but the debate in the public domain was never on merits but only on the lines of how modi is progressive reformer or how GST is Gabbar Singh tax. Even issues like farm laws, CAA, art370 were reduced to modi being a progressive reformer or being accused fascism and were never really focused on its merits. For the first time we have a major political discussion on a proposal which can only be debated in merits and not emotions. Sure, opposition is trying to paint modi fascist again, but inherently this is the issue which can only be debated on its merits and hence we are seeing so much mature discussion around it which is unprecedented. It's a delight to see everyone talking on merits, giving new thoughts, bringing new perspectives and not labelling it with cheap emotion to get traction. We need more of such mature politics. PS: I am saying everything thus government has brought was purely ideological and emotional. I am saying that it was sold to the public using ideological or emotional narratives. While opposition was never seen opposing anything on merits but only on fear mongering emotions. You may disagree with me, I know I am biased. But you everyone can atleast agree on the fact that country is having a mature discussion of this kind for the first time.
It makes no sense to vote for a govt only to find that it's fallen midway and we have to vote again in between for 1-2 year term and then keep repeating the whole thing. No, thanks.
@@surudog4929 you still don't get it, do you? Who'd be interested in voting a govt which is only going to last 1 or 2 years before the main term elections. MLAs themselves would have no incentive to work much in those years except just try to show some quick and dirty results.
@@sandeepmanjunath8004 wow... that's even more horrible..govt collapsing early on and all the new projects, development plans being halted under Presidential rule for next 3-4 years. Imagine this happening in economic powerhouse states like MH, KA. God help us 🙏
If we go for one nation one Election, what will happen if Loksabha is dissolved say after two years? Then will the entire states assemblies will also get dissolved?
If this goes through, local state issues will take a backseat as against national agenda and national parties would have a leeway to introduce any sort of Tom/Dick/harry candidates for state assembly seats.
Very good analysis Faye. Keep it up. From cost saving angle it may be good idea. But it may end like the big fish eating all the small fishes. Hence the opposition from the regional parties.
@@lekshmijh807 Lekshmi madam, how will this increase majority for bjp? you think people dont have the brain to vote for different partys at centre and state?
It might be financially efficient only with our politicians working in the interest of people instead of power, well that's IMPOSSIBLE anyway, so they end up playing musical chairs, govt collapses, reforms, ... a political loop Given the uncertainty of our loyal netaas, it'll just become an extra burden to conduct elections such unstable states for minimal terms again and again Great content, lucid explainer!
You have not spoken about the insettion of 82A which decides an appointed date by a notification issued by the president on the first sitting of Loksabha which literally explains when the ONOE comes into effect.
I don't know Faye ,,,,,,,,,,of late they have been getting their own way - eg that time when a whole bunch of MPs were disbarred from returning to Parliament and a few bill got passed in their absence and despite the aftermath of objections nothing was changed -
@@swapnil988 I get your point - but from what I have observed for sometime -- at least I hope I have understood this correctly -if not. you are welcome to correct me. Whenever an opposition MP requests answers for a particular issue or requests a review for a new proposals they put forward in parliament - which could possibly be helpful to the country - the main party either ignores the MP's request or replies to that MP with a blistering response and then the rest of the party proceeds to drown out what the MP from the opposition tries to further the discussion by shouting loudly and consistently. If any MP is trying to improve certain problems being faced by their constituency they should be heard and the matter attended to in a manner that works for their people . Of late and for some time this has not been going on. So if things get worse which more often than not they do the MP and other MP are finally forced to go into demonstration mode. After all they have been elected by particular areas to look after those people's interests and central government cannot possible cover the needs of every single village, city or town - even state. Hence it becomes the MP's priority to put the issue to parliament - I would have thought. But this does not seem to be happening unless they are from the "ruling party". even then it does not necessarily always happen.
Whenever govt.falls due to no majority & fresh elections are conducted for remaining period, then the amendment is of no use & it does not serve the purpose. Aftee the govt. falls, the remaing period must be ruled by President or Governor as the case may be. Or else while giving support of other party, it should give for the full period of five years.
Its a pure central controlled machinery. Check the case 1: when Legislative assemblies dissolved when house of common dissolves. Fine lets do a re-election. case 2: If EC can't conduct LA election it can defer it, without mentioning for how long and what will happen in that state in that vacuum of no government. case 3: LA can be dissolved on the recommendation on any one grounds of 174(2) it shouts CENTRALIZATION
Very sad to state the parties invoke before Independence two nation theory are today vouching for one nation one election. Then one nation one religion ----- Oneness has varible meanigs. Interpreted in various mode. Peple also demad one GST & many others.
Is this actually the need of the hour that the government thinks will benefit us, considering concerns like unemployment, inflation, etc. I mean, stable government will happen through good governance rather than the ruling government deciding how the process should be. Does the taxpayer have to pay for all these hours of discussion that is initiated, which I feel is the standardization of Indian election. Not to mention the experimentation and implementation and years of optimization considering the long shot of 2 /3rd buy-in. It's just feels unnecessary and wasteful...
When's Modi giving us a bye and resting at his favorite Ashram under the sea. His voice turns my mobile to silent. This one election is just a ploy for some undercurrent BJP strategy. Why will they not pass it if they have the numbers, do you have a forum to air your views, get to jail you traitor, call in the ED to shake and silence him/her.The majesty of our rulers makes one imagine they're here to last forever. May God rebuke them we humbly pray and may the poor have a mouthful each day, rather than seeing these vicious ones feathering their homes and stomachs with the best.
there is a stupid idea that government will be relaxed if they are not on the elections mode all throughout five years. we had all the government on election mode all the time for decades upon decades. and the result is terrible. i think there is a high time we should experiment that government is engaged in election for only 3 months of the 5 years and the remainging 57 months they can focus totally on development.
1. Reduce MCC time. 2. Try to conduct polls every year simultaneously first. EC can't hold Haryana and MH elections together, and bjp want to conduct all together. Try syncing every year elections together, then clubbing two year elections, and slowly move clubbing state elections. It can be good if all states go together for elections but not with national elections. Under the cover it is already one nation two elections. Hire different volunteers for elections and stop exploiting teachers for these works. 3. Stop MP to campaign in MLA issues.
*☝️🇮🇳మోడీ అమిత్ షా లు కావాలనే ఆ యుద్ధ జ్ఞాపిక ఫోటోను పాకిస్తాన్ లొంగిపోయిన ఫోటో ను తీసెయ్యడమే కాదు వాళ్ళ ఆలోచన కూడా అదే. జై కాంగ్రెస్.. BJP నాయకులకు మూర్ఖత్వం పెరిగి పోయింది వ్యవస్థలను నాశనం చెయ్యడమే వాళ్ళ విధానం అందుకే ఆ 1971 యుద్ధంలో పాకిస్తాన్ ఓడి భారత దేశ ఆర్మిని శరణు జొచ్చిన / శరణు వేడిన యుద్ధ ఫోటోను మిలటరీ పోరాటాన్ని గుర్తు చేసే ఘట్టం గొప్ప చరిత్ర ఫోటోను తీసి దేశాన్ని అవమానించారు. వాళ్ళ దేశభక్తిని ప్రశ్నించండి. వీళ్ళు.. వీల్లేనా దేశప్రజలను అర్బన్ నక్సలైట్లు అని సంబోధించేది. వీళ్ల వల్ల దేశానికి ఏమి ఒరగలేదు ఒరగబోదు మిత్రమా. అది వాళ్ళ పరిపాలన తీరు నోరొక్కటి చెబితే నొసలొక్కటి చెబుతుంది. అలోచించండి. EVM ల టాంపరింగే వాళ్ళ బలం మిత్రమా? సర్వం దేశనాశణమే. జై భీమ్ జై ఫూలే జై పెరియార్ జై భారత్ 🇮🇳🙏*
Inspite of knowing the fact that BJP does not have the number, why did they present the bill, was it not a ploy to say to the people that, they tried, but the opposition did not co-operate. Government is spending crores of amount on various projects, many give back desired results and many not; Government is spending crores of rupees to run varoius departments, on officer's salary and after retirement, on family pension... So, money is not the factor, they are aiming one party rule, a nation without opposition... Just like the slogan of congress मुक्त भारत...
@nobufrancis685 why not? You say that only because u choose to think of the person in the chair as hitler, others may see the person sitting in the chair as fdr or churchill
It's only a humbag. Only to divert the Adani issue, the Jalsa Party had introduced the one nation bill. The govt isnot at all in the interest of the people. It's acting against the existing laws. If they do not acceptable for its agenda, then it's trying to amend those laws. God alone can save this country.
and how exactly is bjp becoming that? you think people are stoopid that they wont chose a different party at centre as well as state? people know to distinguish between which party to vote at centre and state
If INC says that with this bill, the BJP will win in both center and state, that means 1. they don't have the confidence that they will even come to power in center and then in states 2. they are disregarding the intellect of the Bhartiya voters considering them as gullible.
As per the Government point of view ONOP will be beneficial to the country. So we should give benefit of doubt to the elected Government, they already told this in their ELECTIONS MANIFESTO and there is a precedence earlier who suggested this at various times and in different Governments. There may be some narrow minded people who bluntly oppose this idea without going to merits. Government should leave them and share more and more information on the bill to public and educate the public on benefits. Then opposition parties have to accept as times goes on. Currently BJP has approximate numbers to pass the bill but it seems they also want to go with concenses of majority of parties to become reality.
People who oppose are not Narrow minded. Infact people who educate the public only the benefits are narrow-minded. It's important to listen to the opposition to understand the drawbacks. By analyzing these points, you can uncover the truth behind the bills. Instead of educating public by highlighting the benefits, educate the public to critically assess the bills themselves; they'll then discern the merits and demerits.
@@2kcreations721 As on today Opposition has not given one valid reason why they are opposing. At least Government side they are showing the some reasons to bring the bill. If Opposition has some sense they should have bring this issue very early and educate the public and should have defeated the BJP in elections. But they are more interested in targeting BJP on non issues and getting defeated very easily.
@@jumdas1049 There is always doubts for someone in any reform. It is not possible to satisfy every one so considering the majority opinion anyone can go ahead on any policy. If that policy is failed in feature anyway public can teach a lesson to the party who brought it and can bring changes. Thats how changes will come, otherwise no improvement in people life and country.
This is a horrible thing for our nation & it should not happen at any cost. Let's hope this govt doesn't officially change our democracy to dictatorship. Unofficially we are already in a dictatorship rule sadly.
@@surudog4929this is a top to bottom approach which is always bad for democracy we need bottom to top approach for development people to vote on the local issues not just voting right voting is also had in North Korea too so is that a democracy
@ how is voting 1 time in 5 years bad? You vote for Lok Sabha, state assembly and any other local bill that is on the ballot. this is how it happens in US or happened at the time of India’s independence. What is that you ‘lose’ by voting once in 5 years vs what you have today?
The reason given for ONOP is not appealing ...what is the real reason? To eradicate Regional Parties ...Only National party should rule Centre and States so any bill passed by Parliament will be endorsed by state assemblies. R S will become a Yes RS...all because only strong national party today is BJP ..so . Stupid Regional Parties JD JD(U) TDP ADMK PMK ..all support BJP agenda 😅😅😅😅
**What a vague logic.** **1st point:** In the 2019 Andhra Pradesh and Odisha Legislative Assembly elections, which were held simultaneously with the central elections, the YSRC Party and BJD won despite the Modi wave at the center! So, how come people didn’t choose the same party for both the state and the center? **2nd point:** Why are we assuming that people are so incapable that they can’t distinguish between national and state issues? Why should national issues always suppress local, state-level issues? Can’t the opposite happen? Or are we under the impression that situations like a Balakot strike will occur before every election? **3rd point:** You argued that mid-term elections prompt governments to announce more populist policies instead of focusing on long-term development, worsening the fiscal condition of states. Aren’t we already in a race for populist policies? From Bengal to Delhi, Karnataka to Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Punjab, Haryana, Telangana, and more-over half the states are implementing mindless populist measures regardless of fiscal conditions. This issue has nothing to do with *One Nation, One Election* (ONOE); it’s a separate economic concern. However, I argue that ONOE could minimize this tendency. Once elections are completed, political parties wouldn’t need to worry about frequent elections and can focus on long-term policies rather than announcing freebies to counter opposition or mitigate anti-incumbency sentiments. *(I do agree, however, that strong reforms are needed to stop political parties from making such freebie promises to the masses.)* **4th point:** Conducting elections costs thousands of crores in taxpayer money, state by state. While some argue this is a small price for maintaining democracy, the cumulative cost over 30 years is enormous. If ONOE can save that money and redirect it to R&D, ISRO, or defense, why not? Regarding the cost of extra EVMs, it would be a one-time expenditure. While some might point out that this would still cost crores, they must remember it’s a one-time investment. **5th point:** You mentioned reducing the Model Code of Conduct's (MCC) tenure to address delays. But it’s not as simple as reducing the MCC time frame. While development projects are delayed during this period, another major issue is the redeployment of security forces and government officials. Efficient officers are pulled from critical duties like guarding borders and ensuring internal security to oversee elections every 4-5 months. Schools are shut down to become polling stations, and teachers, whose primary responsibility is education, are assigned election duties. This significantly disrupts education. **6th point:** Businessmen and investors prefer a stable political environment to ensure consistent policies. Frequent elections lead to policy uncertainty and deter investments. **7th point:** Accountability shouldn’t depend on the frequency of elections. If ONOE cannot ensure accountability for five years, does it mean we should conduct elections every 2-3 months to guarantee higher accountability and democracy? This logic doesn’t hold. States like Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, and Sikkim, which already hold simultaneous elections, do not lack accountability. Historically, simultaneous elections were conducted four times since India’s independence. Does that imply democracy and accountability were weaker during those periods? Furthermore, it’s unreasonable to assume that MPs and MLAs will frequently visit their constituencies during shorter election cycles but would entirely neglect them once ONOE is implemented for a five-year term. As if they’re actively showing up in their constituencies under the current system to ensure accountability-something that’s supposedly at risk of declining under an ONOE system. What a joke! **8th point:** ONOE would reduce the incentive for political parties to topple stable governments for short-term gains. Are we seriously suggesting that all 28 state governments would collapse after every ONOE? That’s unrealistic and naive. Regarding constitutional amendments, the rule states that an MP or MLA’s tenure is five years-not more. However, there’s no constitutional restriction on reducing their term through elections, such as by-elections. ONOE wouldn’t violate this principle. By-elections themselves are a form of mid-term elections. I’m not a legal expert, but Article 370 was once deemed untouchable due to constitutional constraints. Yet, today, it’s history. Similarly, ONOE could become a reality. **9th point:** Political parties’ expenditures during elections are astronomical. The ruling party often receives the majority of donations; for example, BJP accounts for half of all party expenditures. However, on a per-MP basis, regional parties like TMC spend more. With ONOE, political parties wouldn’t need to seek frequent donations from businesses, reducing black money in elections and political dependency on big business houses. **Conclusion:** Don’t underestimate the intelligence of Indian voters. Our population has matured over time and will continue to evolve. India’s federal structure doesn’t imply that electoral politics should dominate year-round. The real question is whether the existence of regional parties should take precedence over national development, long-term policies, and stability, which are more critical for growth. Countries like the USA, Canada, and the UK thrive with two-party systems. Does that make their democracies less effective? India needs to overcome policy paralysis to compete with hostile neighbors like China, which implements long-term policies efficiently. A slightly less chaotic democracy won’t harm us, but continued policy paralysis will. **"I SUPPORT ONE NATION, ONE ELECTION FOR INDIA’S GROWTH."**
Idiotic people bungling with the Constitution. Constitution originally proposed only simultaneous elections every Five Years. The word “DISSOLVE “ used in Articles 83,85,172,174 and 356 is suspension but not dismissal. Then S 14, 15 of Representation of People Act 1951 become unconstitutional. Just delete them. No constitutional amendment is needed. Supreme Court’s judgments in 1) Keshavananda Bharati, 2) SR Bommai etc cases destroyed Indian Constitution, Democracy and Sovereignty altogether. Judges are LL. B. Qualified people and legal experts more or less than the arguing counsels. They may not be knowledgeable about political concepts such as Democracy, monarchy, republic, social, secular, federal or unitary etc concepts. India cannot survive as a country for long unless the above Supreme Court judgments are reversed.
Arrest corruption if you have intentions of saving people's money.
According to the American Constitution, the same person cannot be elected twice as the president for more than two consecutive terms. Moreover, there two consecutive terms is 8 years as compared to India's 10 years. Imagine the same incumbency for another 5years!!🙄🙄🥱🥱
and the people also generally vote for different part in every few elections even though they only have 2 real options, they don't support incumbency, here for some reason once a party comes it we just keep voting the sane party over and over for many years
Because 80 percent get 5kg rice free simple @@piya-tf
This young intellectual journalist is the coolest🫰
On the face of it - it looks logical just like Demonetization & GST did... post that we know how it all went
👏🏻👏🏻
demonitization did not yeild. but gst did.
@@SDFNI3894YR manufacturer here🤚. Both didn't.
@@emransaifee you're unemployed bjp hater😂😂😂
Dont try to fool others
What do u manufacture@@emransaifee
Great move.
India will save some money with this move.
But the main advantage is that Government and its ministers can concentrate on their work without their focus diverting to multiple state's election campaigns. Also will save time of government workers
🤣🤣🤣
The politicians will have 5 years of un interrupted time to corrupt, at least now they fear going back to people while seeking votes for different election.
People are loosing more power to politicians.
Just like demonization you will know there was no money saved after 1 year.
It's not possible in long term . The elections will go out of sync anyway because of fragile mandates and invite unnecessary elections with a shorter team.
@@rgrm104 you are talking as if government getting dissolved before term in common thing in india.
there will be one or two incidents in 5 years, can keep separate elections for them if required. still the amount of money saved as well as the productivity added because of lesser time consumed for elections will far outweigh the demerits
Nothing happens in India on time. If it did we would've been developed by now. Look at China. One nation one election will cause the problems of the states be overlooked by national problems. Each state has its own unique problems. At least with different elections the state government can be held accountable. And one election means people are more likely to vote for the same party in both state and general elections. That's a big problem. It allows a single party to become dominant and they aren't accountable to anyone. Our politicians work only during elections. After that they disappear. Or they cause religious and communal violence. This bill will just strengthen the whole thing. Look at both sides of coin.
How about One Nation Two Elections? Let all states have elections together but at the midpoint point of the national elections. This ensures that campaigning for the two elections are separate but still much less elections than what happens now?
yeah this makes sense, people will also not be confused and make the choice seperately for both elections, one for state one for nation
By the numbers now it may feel impossible to pass this bill in one of the houses, so I am assuming that they will ask to pass this bill in a joint session and with some Amit Shah magic I think they might just do it, cause one thing I have learned is that this government is highly strategic in their moves and not to doubt them too much when they say that they are going to do something, whether they get the execution right or not is a different issue but they will do it.
constitutional amendment bills cant be passed via joint session.
Thanks for pointing that out, my bad. Still wouldn’t count it out just yet because I know the Modi and Amit Shah since I was barely 1 year old (I am a Gujarati), they just that knack to win crucial battles, they might pull it off somehow (Politics n’ all).
There should be two seperate election for a tenure of 4 or 5 years. Loksabha election and after 2 and half years all state assembly election. So that people will not be confused.
@@kumarp7438 then thats similar to whats happening now bro. there wont be any reduction in election cost
@Spc_1996 But it's not same. Now assembly elections are held every year for one or the other state. So small change is all states assembly elections should be conducted at once. It's not about reduction in cost but about maintaining the democracy and fair election.
Am not sure if you have experience in voting MP and MLA vote same day. There is so much confusion inside the booth. Sometimes MP vote you want to vote for X party but you end up voting for Y party. The same way MLA vote you want to vote for Y party but you end up voting for X party. There is so many such issues.
@@kumarp7438 i dont think the people going to vote are that stoopid that they dont know whch party to vote for in the centre and state. maybe 1% of the population might be facing issue (especially people who are above 75+ years old)
but on the positive side, it will promote a lot of people to go and vote especially those who work in neighbouring states etc as they will get leave without applying. also people will feel there is a much higher need to go and vote that day because of higher responsibility
@Spc_1996 it's not about stupidity but about education. Well educated people not many of them go out to vote. Rural voter turnout is more than the urban voter turnout. Rural people are not much educated compared to urban. So they can be confused while voting if MP and MLA election is conducted together and this is happening. Even 1% vote is more than enough for a different result.
@@kumarp7438 I know the significance of 1% vote difference bro. But as i said, the advantages far outweights the disadvantages. And the advantages are in terms of numbers (quantitative) . we know howbthe government focus on growth reduced because of election for 1 quarter and because of which our GDP slowed down for a quarter. The same effect can happen in states as well. If we club them, the lesser the impact.
Also we can quantity how much there will be cost reduction because of simultaneous elections. And the disadvantages are qualitative. Its "MAYBEs" which might or might not be true.
We need this to improve our productivity as nation. We don't want to be in election mode all the time.
This will definitely bring political stability if the bill passes
.
Impossible
.
@@Interstellar2123 true bro. leftists will oppose anything ad everything brought by the NDA govt. because they don't want nda to bring any value to the country
But the current Indian mindset is not ready for it!! It is an ideal situation..In India Ideal situations are a dream
Think about those 80 crores people who still live on government ration due to no job prospect in those areas.
It is an absolutely horrendous, premonition igniting, insidious idea. Decentralization at the hands of the government will influence results. There are 100s of discussions about this.
It’s absolutely clear this is an effort from BJP to cement their 4th term…
This Gen Z journalist is India's pride🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
Even if the voting and election seems complicated, the counting would be pretty easy with the EVM... 😅
It would bring good and bad things together, but i think BJP wants centre and states govt power in their hands at the same time like nehru did.
and how exactly can bjp achieve that? you think people are stoopid that they wont chose a different party at centre as well as state?
people know to distinguish between which party to vote at centre and state
This will save so much money and some people will do actual work more than become a so called karyakartas 😂
Why do we don't have one nation one education, one health care, one set of rules to all indians...
So many of the states and loksabha go together and vote differently. Odisha and even AP is the best example. People have voted different parties. The only party that needs to worry is Congress. The other regional parties have seen that historically, it will not impact them.
Exactly. Why can't people understand this simple concept i don't understand.
@@nikhilbhute07Because they dont want to understand. They dont want bjp to do anything good for the country's economic progress
Not to mention, Now even small regional parties can hope to make it big Nationally !!! No more Domination of National Parties. Next, I hope they cap spending on Election campaigns. It will create a more level playing field.
@@hindurashtra63 yes and will stop unnecessary and wasteful circus during campaigning
That was a very lucid explanation, Faye. Keep it up. Love, Alice
VERY VERY INSSIDIOUS.. AS SURJIT NAIR SAYS " INDIA CAN BECOME ANOTHER NORTH KOREA 😢
What about those who contest elections from two seats? Would that be banned too as there will definitely be a re-election on one seat? Also, if it is not banned then will they allow one person to contest elections on one lok sabha seat and one vidhan sabha seat at the same time if elections are held simultaneously?
Let there be one election on the same day for all the states.
"We the people" are just silent witness to this.
Very well explained, Faye!
One advantage of having multiple Election is that its give people a chance to express their views at intervals.
Exactly
One nation one election one choukidar one EC one Rajeev kumar, one government for eternity, why spend ppl's billions of money for this😂😂😂
but whats the possibility of reelection in state? in five years max only 1 or might be 2 states constituency is dissolved. secondly it will enable voters to choose government who has majority, making political parties rethink on their fundamentals.
Great, Now Indian Politicians can plan long-term for 5 whole years when they are in Power. No more distractions like Elections every few months and Campaigning. Hope the Freebies will also end with this.. We are sick and tired of Freebies, I rather have my taxpayer money spent on useful things like Road, Highways and Infra Projects.
YOU BETTER THINK TWICE 😢
8:10 Misinformation: 19 out of 28 States are Governed by the BJP led NDA and Only 8 States are Governed by the I.N.D.I Alliance. And the BJP governs 12 Indian states independently, without coalition partners.
Soros funds these kind of misinformation
Thanks to Faye to simplify this for a common man… I can’t imagine how much works goes behind creating this complicated topic in 15 mins..:
i'm kinda on the fence for this, in theory it sounds pretty efficient to do ONOE, but there can be issues during the implementation, but if it can work then we should give it a shot
One thing which is pertinent to note here is that for the first time I am seeing the government bringing something on the table which cannot be sold off on emotions or ideology. Sure there have been things like GST which were not ideological or emotional but a step towards better tax structure, but the debate in the public domain was never on merits but only on the lines of how modi is progressive reformer or how GST is Gabbar Singh tax. Even issues like farm laws, CAA, art370 were reduced to modi being a progressive reformer or being accused fascism and were never really focused on its merits. For the first time we have a major political discussion on a proposal which can only be debated in merits and not emotions. Sure, opposition is trying to paint modi fascist again, but inherently this is the issue which can only be debated on its merits and hence we are seeing so much mature discussion around it which is unprecedented. It's a delight to see everyone talking on merits, giving new thoughts, bringing new perspectives and not labelling it with cheap emotion to get traction. We need more of such mature politics.
PS: I am saying everything thus government has brought was purely ideological and emotional. I am saying that it was sold to the public using ideological or emotional narratives. While opposition was never seen opposing anything on merits but only on fear mongering emotions. You may disagree with me, I know I am biased. But you everyone can atleast agree on the fact that country is having a mature discussion of this kind for the first time.
Why not one nation one education?
Complicated or efficient?
We need this urgently. It makes no sense to have ANY election within a 5 year window.
It makes no sense to vote for a govt only to find that it's fallen midway and we have to vote again in between for 1-2 year term and then keep repeating the whole thing. No, thanks.
@ so you do agree we should vote 1 time in 5 years. Right?
@@surudog4929 you still don't get it, do you? Who'd be interested in voting a govt which is only going to last 1 or 2 years before the main term elections. MLAs themselves would have no incentive to work much in those years except just try to show some quick and dirty results.
@@7777linpawsIf a state government collapses prior to the 5 year term. Presidential rule would need to be imposed
@@sandeepmanjunath8004 wow... that's even more horrible..govt collapsing early on and all the new projects, development plans being halted under Presidential rule for next 3-4 years. Imagine this happening in economic powerhouse states like MH, KA. God help us 🙏
If we go for one nation one Election, what will happen if Loksabha is dissolved say after two years? Then will the entire states assemblies will also get dissolved?
If this goes through, local state issues will take a backseat as against national agenda and national parties would have a leeway to introduce any sort of Tom/Dick/harry candidates for state assembly seats.
Very good analysis Faye. Keep it up. From cost saving angle it may be good idea. But it may end like the big fish eating all the small fishes. Hence the opposition from the regional parties.
Wanting to cause chaos only no need to explain...
Sounds like no one is against this, everyone thinks its necessary but opposition is opposing it for the sake of opposing
Modi govt’s track record with implementation has been very bad. Be it GST or demonetisation.
Everyone from rickshawpullers to barbers to peons to officers are not in favour of one policy.
The nature of Modi government is impliment first plan second
This is probably a long term strategy to get a greater majority next time around, and maybe win a few more states in the process
@@lekshmijh807 Lekshmi madam, how will this increase majority for bjp? you think people dont have the brain to vote for different partys at centre and state?
It might be financially efficient only with our politicians working in the interest of people instead of power, well that's IMPOSSIBLE anyway, so they end up playing musical chairs, govt collapses, reforms, ... a political loop
Given the uncertainty of our loyal netaas, it'll just become an extra burden to conduct elections such unstable states for minimal terms again and again
Great content, lucid explainer!
This govt cant think 😢
Very well explained.
You have not spoken about the insettion of 82A which decides an appointed date by a notification issued by the president on the first sitting of Loksabha which literally explains when the ONOE comes into effect.
Electoral reforms could have been thought of as a priority.
I don't know Faye ,,,,,,,,,,of late they have been getting their own way - eg that time when a whole bunch of MPs were disbarred from returning to Parliament and a few bill got passed in their absence and despite the aftermath of objections nothing was changed -
@@yasminfinlay8018 so parliament should be at the mercy of those who don't want it to function? Parliament is for discussions or protests?
@@swapnil988 I get your point - but from what I have observed for sometime -- at least I hope I have understood this correctly -if not. you are welcome to correct me. Whenever an opposition MP requests answers for a particular issue or requests a review for a new proposals they put forward in parliament - which could possibly be helpful to the country - the main party either ignores the MP's request or replies to that MP with a blistering response and then the rest of the party proceeds to drown out what the MP from the opposition tries to further the discussion by shouting loudly and consistently. If any MP is trying to improve certain problems being faced by their constituency they should be heard and the matter attended to in a manner that works for their people . Of late and for some time this has not been going on. So if things get worse which more often than not they do the MP and other MP are finally forced to go into demonstration mode. After all they have been elected by particular areas to look after those people's interests and central government cannot possible cover the needs of every single village, city or town - even state. Hence it becomes the MP's priority to put the issue to parliament - I would have thought. But this does not seem to be happening unless they are from the "ruling party". even then it does not necessarily always happen.
I ❤ ur star war t shirt
I'm not supporter of any party. One nation One election seems logical. Central power will not hv any influence towards local elections..
#one nation one election is necessary for Indian secularism Government 🎉😂
Whenever govt.falls due to no majority & fresh elections are conducted for remaining period, then the amendment is of no use & it does not serve the purpose. Aftee the govt. falls, the remaing period must be ruled by President or Governor as the case may be. Or else while giving support of other party, it should give for the full period of five years.
May the force be with you Faye
No transition is easy. A closed mind finds everything daunting and will throw endless arguments.
Its a pure central controlled machinery. Check the
case 1: when Legislative assemblies dissolved when house of common dissolves. Fine lets do a re-election.
case 2: If EC can't conduct LA election it can defer it, without mentioning for how long and what will happen in that state in that vacuum of no government.
case 3: LA can be dissolved on the recommendation on any one grounds of 174(2)
it shouts CENTRALIZATION
First electoral reforms have to be done.
Very sad to state the parties invoke before Independence two nation theory are today vouching for one nation one election. Then one nation one religion -----
Oneness has varible meanigs. Interpreted in various mode.
Peple also demad one GST & many others.
Is this actually the need of the hour that the government thinks will benefit us, considering concerns like unemployment, inflation, etc. I mean, stable government will happen through good governance rather than the ruling government deciding how the process should be.
Does the taxpayer have to pay for all these hours of discussion that is initiated, which I feel is the standardization of Indian election. Not to mention the experimentation and implementation and years of optimization considering the long shot of 2 /3rd buy-in.
It's just feels unnecessary and wasteful...
ONE NATION
ONE ELECTION
ONE RAJA
TO RULE
When's Modi giving us a bye and resting at his favorite Ashram under the sea. His voice turns my mobile to silent. This one election is just a ploy for some undercurrent BJP strategy. Why will they not pass it if they have the numbers, do you have a forum to air your views, get to jail you traitor, call in the ED to shake and silence him/her.The majesty of our rulers makes one imagine they're here to last forever. May God rebuke them we humbly pray and may the poor have a mouthful each day, rather than seeing these vicious ones feathering their homes and stomachs with the best.
instead of accusation, please elaborate about ploy.. if some body calls you names without giving reasons, you will like it..😏
It will be a good thing
there is a stupid idea that government will be relaxed if they are not on the elections mode all throughout five years. we had all the government on election mode all the time for decades upon decades. and the result is terrible. i think there is a high time we should experiment that government is engaged in election for only 3 months of the 5 years and the remainging 57 months they can focus totally on development.
1. Reduce MCC time.
2. Try to conduct polls every year simultaneously first. EC can't hold Haryana and MH elections together, and bjp want to conduct all together.
Try syncing every year elections together, then clubbing two year elections, and slowly move clubbing state elections. It can be good if all states go together for elections but not with national elections.
Under the cover it is already one nation two elections.
Hire different volunteers for elections and stop exploiting teachers for these works.
3. Stop MP to campaign in MLA issues.
*☝️🇮🇳మోడీ అమిత్ షా లు కావాలనే ఆ యుద్ధ జ్ఞాపిక ఫోటోను పాకిస్తాన్ లొంగిపోయిన ఫోటో ను తీసెయ్యడమే కాదు వాళ్ళ ఆలోచన కూడా అదే. జై కాంగ్రెస్.. BJP నాయకులకు మూర్ఖత్వం పెరిగి పోయింది వ్యవస్థలను నాశనం చెయ్యడమే వాళ్ళ విధానం అందుకే ఆ 1971 యుద్ధంలో పాకిస్తాన్ ఓడి భారత దేశ ఆర్మిని శరణు జొచ్చిన / శరణు వేడిన యుద్ధ ఫోటోను మిలటరీ పోరాటాన్ని గుర్తు చేసే ఘట్టం గొప్ప చరిత్ర ఫోటోను తీసి దేశాన్ని అవమానించారు. వాళ్ళ దేశభక్తిని ప్రశ్నించండి. వీళ్ళు.. వీల్లేనా దేశప్రజలను అర్బన్ నక్సలైట్లు అని సంబోధించేది. వీళ్ల వల్ల దేశానికి ఏమి ఒరగలేదు ఒరగబోదు మిత్రమా. అది వాళ్ళ పరిపాలన తీరు నోరొక్కటి చెబితే నొసలొక్కటి చెబుతుంది. అలోచించండి. EVM ల టాంపరింగే వాళ్ళ బలం మిత్రమా? సర్వం దేశనాశణమే. జై భీమ్ జై ఫూలే జై పెరియార్ జై భారత్ 🇮🇳🙏*
sounds like a good idea to me. But time will tell if this is a good change or a bad one.
The future of BJP/RSS's intellectual progression should be, "One God"!
We need ONOP, no matter what any biased journalist (Faye) says!
She did not say anything..she just put up two sides.
Views seem biased towards opposing the change.
Inspite of knowing the fact that BJP does not have the number, why did they present the bill, was it not a ploy to say to the people that, they tried, but the opposition did not co-operate.
Government is spending crores of amount on various projects, many give back desired results and many not; Government is spending crores of rupees to run varoius departments, on officer's salary and after retirement, on family pension... So, money is not the factor, they are aiming one party rule, a nation without opposition... Just like the slogan of congress मुक्त भारत...
Wow girl! The camera quality is really good!! Happy you getting the equipment you need!!
Next step: green screen! 😄
It's not a good idea (ONOE).
Efficiency ....who decides about efficiency.... the center or the states. In Hitler's Germany he sat in Berlin and decided about Germany's efficiency.
In fdrs america, he sat in Washington and decided americas efficiency
In churchhills uk, he sat in london and decided uks efficiency
Have some sanity.... don't draw parallels to Roosevelt's America & Churchill's Britain to Hitler's Germany.
@nobufrancis685 why not? You say that only because u choose to think of the person in the chair as hitler, others may see the person sitting in the chair as fdr or churchill
It's only a humbag. Only to divert the Adani issue, the Jalsa Party had introduced the one nation bill. The govt isnot at all in the interest of the people. It's acting against the existing laws. If they do not acceptable for its agenda, then it's trying to amend those laws. God alone can save this country.
Ok so where’s the proof and evidence regarding the adani. Why dosent the USA give the evidence if they claiming so big
oh.. lot of accusations.. no proofs..
If One Nation One Election happens in BJP time , after that it will be One Nation only , no election.......Then Ram Rajya dictatorship 😂😂😂😂😂
BJP be pulling a Nehru rn. Becoming the same thing they hated.
Bjp is becoming all inclusive and democratic? Since when
and how exactly is bjp becoming that? you think people are stoopid that they wont chose a different party at centre as well as state?
people know to distinguish between which party to vote at centre and state
Good
Bjp always rigs the evm this will be very convenient for them
If INC says that with this bill, the BJP will win in both center and state, that means 1. they don't have the confidence that they will even come to power in center and then in states 2. they are disregarding the intellect of the Bhartiya voters considering them as gullible.
but voters ARE gullible
India needs ONOE asap.
Just something to divert attention from real issues.
Manipur issue hasn't been handled in 19 months and this is the priority?
@Komorebineeded Manipur is your priority, not India's.
Once BJP is out from power, ppl should think about the idea of one nation one election 😊
As if there is no one nation so far😂😂😂
we need this
As per the Government point of view ONOP will be beneficial to the country. So we should give benefit of doubt to the elected Government, they already told this in their ELECTIONS MANIFESTO and there is a precedence earlier who suggested this at various times and in different Governments. There may be some narrow minded people who bluntly oppose this idea without going to merits. Government should leave them and share more and more information on the bill to public and educate the public on benefits. Then opposition parties have to accept as times goes on. Currently BJP has approximate numbers to pass the bill but it seems they also want to go with concenses of majority of parties to become reality.
"benefit of doubt policy" . No we don't want doubts.
People who oppose are not Narrow minded. Infact people who educate the public only the benefits are narrow-minded. It's important to listen to the opposition to understand the drawbacks. By analyzing these points, you can uncover the truth behind the bills. Instead of educating public by highlighting the benefits, educate the public to critically assess the bills themselves; they'll then discern the merits and demerits.
@@2kcreations721 As on today Opposition has not given one valid reason why they are opposing. At least Government side they are showing the some reasons to bring the bill. If Opposition has some sense they should have bring this issue very early and educate the public and should have defeated the BJP in elections. But they are more interested in targeting BJP on non issues and getting defeated very easily.
@@jumdas1049 There is always doubts for someone in any reform. It is not possible to satisfy every one so considering the majority opinion anyone can go ahead on any policy. If that policy is failed in feature anyway public can teach a lesson to the party who brought it and can bring changes. Thats how changes will come, otherwise no improvement in people life and country.
@hariuma7729 . The majority of people i know cannot even write a paragraph, letter, form in english or bengali properly.
This is a horrible thing for our nation & it should not happen at any cost. Let's hope this govt doesn't officially change our democracy to dictatorship. Unofficially we are already in a dictatorship rule sadly.
Why? You have the same right to vote and choose your leaders. Why is this ‘horrible’?
@@surudog4929this is a top to bottom approach which is always bad for democracy we need bottom to top approach for development people to vote on the local issues not just voting right voting is also had in North Korea too so is that a democracy
@ how is voting 1 time in 5 years bad? You vote for Lok Sabha, state assembly and any other local bill that is on the ballot. this is how it happens in US or happened at the time of India’s independence.
What is that you ‘lose’ by voting once in 5 years vs what you have today?
Just because the party you vote doesnt win, its not dictatorship
🤣
S to deflect attention
The reason given for ONOP is not appealing ...what is the real reason? To eradicate Regional Parties ...Only National party should rule Centre and States so any bill passed by Parliament will be endorsed by state assemblies. R S will become a Yes RS...all because only strong national party today is BJP ..so .
Stupid Regional Parties JD JD(U) TDP ADMK PMK ..all support BJP agenda 😅😅😅😅
**What a vague logic.**
**1st point:** In the 2019 Andhra Pradesh and Odisha Legislative Assembly elections, which were held simultaneously with the central elections, the YSRC Party and BJD won despite the Modi wave at the center! So, how come people didn’t choose the same party for both the state and the center?
**2nd point:** Why are we assuming that people are so incapable that they can’t distinguish between national and state issues? Why should national issues always suppress local, state-level issues? Can’t the opposite happen? Or are we under the impression that situations like a Balakot strike will occur before every election?
**3rd point:** You argued that mid-term elections prompt governments to announce more populist policies instead of focusing on long-term development, worsening the fiscal condition of states. Aren’t we already in a race for populist policies? From Bengal to Delhi, Karnataka to Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Punjab, Haryana, Telangana, and more-over half the states are implementing mindless populist measures regardless of fiscal conditions. This issue has nothing to do with *One Nation, One Election* (ONOE); it’s a separate economic concern. However, I argue that ONOE could minimize this tendency. Once elections are completed, political parties wouldn’t need to worry about frequent elections and can focus on long-term policies rather than announcing freebies to counter opposition or mitigate anti-incumbency sentiments.
*(I do agree, however, that strong reforms are needed to stop political parties from making such freebie promises to the masses.)*
**4th point:** Conducting elections costs thousands of crores in taxpayer money, state by state. While some argue this is a small price for maintaining democracy, the cumulative cost over 30 years is enormous. If ONOE can save that money and redirect it to R&D, ISRO, or defense, why not? Regarding the cost of extra EVMs, it would be a one-time expenditure. While some might point out that this would still cost crores, they must remember it’s a one-time investment.
**5th point:** You mentioned reducing the Model Code of Conduct's (MCC) tenure to address delays. But it’s not as simple as reducing the MCC time frame. While development projects are delayed during this period, another major issue is the redeployment of security forces and government officials. Efficient officers are pulled from critical duties like guarding borders and ensuring internal security to oversee elections every 4-5 months. Schools are shut down to become polling stations, and teachers, whose primary responsibility is education, are assigned election duties. This significantly disrupts education.
**6th point:** Businessmen and investors prefer a stable political environment to ensure consistent policies. Frequent elections lead to policy uncertainty and deter investments.
**7th point:** Accountability shouldn’t depend on the frequency of elections. If ONOE cannot ensure accountability for five years, does it mean we should conduct elections every 2-3 months to guarantee higher accountability and democracy? This logic doesn’t hold. States like Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, and Sikkim, which already hold simultaneous elections, do not lack accountability. Historically, simultaneous elections were conducted four times since India’s independence. Does that imply democracy and accountability were weaker during those periods?
Furthermore, it’s unreasonable to assume that MPs and MLAs will frequently visit their constituencies during shorter election cycles but would entirely neglect them once ONOE is implemented for a five-year term. As if they’re actively showing up in their constituencies under the current system to ensure accountability-something that’s supposedly at risk of declining under an ONOE system. What a joke!
**8th point:** ONOE would reduce the incentive for political parties to topple stable governments for short-term gains. Are we seriously suggesting that all 28 state governments would collapse after every ONOE? That’s unrealistic and naive.
Regarding constitutional amendments, the rule states that an MP or MLA’s tenure is five years-not more. However, there’s no constitutional restriction on reducing their term through elections, such as by-elections. ONOE wouldn’t violate this principle. By-elections themselves are a form of mid-term elections.
I’m not a legal expert, but Article 370 was once deemed untouchable due to constitutional constraints. Yet, today, it’s history. Similarly, ONOE could become a reality.
**9th point:** Political parties’ expenditures during elections are astronomical. The ruling party often receives the majority of donations; for example, BJP accounts for half of all party expenditures. However, on a per-MP basis, regional parties like TMC spend more. With ONOE, political parties wouldn’t need to seek frequent donations from businesses, reducing black money in elections and political dependency on big business houses.
**Conclusion:** Don’t underestimate the intelligence of Indian voters. Our population has matured over time and will continue to evolve.
India’s federal structure doesn’t imply that electoral politics should dominate year-round. The real question is whether the existence of regional parties should take precedence over national development, long-term policies, and stability, which are more critical for growth.
Countries like the USA, Canada, and the UK thrive with two-party systems. Does that make their democracies less effective? India needs to overcome policy paralysis to compete with hostile neighbors like China, which implements long-term policies efficiently.
A slightly less chaotic democracy won’t harm us, but continued policy paralysis will.
**"I SUPPORT ONE NATION, ONE ELECTION FOR INDIA’S GROWTH."**
Idiotic people bungling with the Constitution. Constitution originally proposed only simultaneous elections every Five Years. The word “DISSOLVE “ used in Articles 83,85,172,174 and 356 is suspension but not dismissal. Then S 14, 15 of Representation of People Act 1951 become unconstitutional. Just delete them. No constitutional amendment is needed. Supreme Court’s judgments in 1) Keshavananda Bharati, 2) SR Bommai etc cases destroyed Indian Constitution, Democracy and Sovereignty altogether. Judges are LL. B. Qualified people and legal experts more or less than the arguing counsels. They may not be knowledgeable about political concepts such as Democracy, monarchy, republic, social, secular, federal or unitary etc concepts. India cannot survive as a country for long unless the above Supreme Court judgments are reversed.
th-cam.com/video/xNDCdZ2VNhg/w-d-xo.htmlsi=F_JjmYsff8Mees4n
Scrap you scrap
No ko Yes karwane ka naam hi BJP hai
You look slimmer in the thumbnail... but in actuality you are not....take care
Again a biased news - this is a great initiative by govt
You are biased in your thoughts. At times, it appears "rubbish"
काँग्रेस is no more
BAM BAM BHOLE
HAR HAR MAHA DEV