I've owned a 2016 GT for almost 2 years and the car just keeps getting better with age. I rarely notice any lack of power. And the engine has gotten more responsive as time has gone on. No doubt due to break in and the car learning my habits. Fuel economy has been good. Averaging 26 in mixed driving and over 30 on the highway. And I mostly use manual mode with the paddles. Not sure why the reviewer is getting poor mileage other than you must be hammering it harder than you realize. In fact, like other Mazdas I've owned this car wakes up when you hammer it. The biggest difference I've felt has been how settled and solid the handling has become. This car is a wonderful drive, composed and communicative. I rarely pay attention to marketing hyperbole, but Mazda's "Horse and rider" take line really does fit this cars overall personality and how connected I feel to it when I drive. Those who complain about Mazda not being more like Ford or other mainstream manufacturers, really need to zip it and buy from one of those other brands. In addition a to Amanti, Mazda also tried to compete with Toyota and Honda head on in the 90's- it did not go well because they tried being something they're not. I would also be all over a AWD with more power as well, but not at the detriment of the superb balance that Mazda has built into this gen 6.
PoliticallyINCorrect to be clear I did mention that 26 was in sport mode and by sport mode, using paddles and hammering it. So this isn't simply driving around in full auto.
I'm really leaning towards a 2017 Mazda 6 for my first car over any other car guys.. I DO NOT want something everybody has like a Honda, Toyota, Ford or even Chevy, etc. ... I want a GREAT car that is not as popular if you know what I mean... What do you guys think?
How much would that lease cost you in the end... is that 24 or 36 months?? Thinking about doing the same thing & wait out for the 2018/19/20 to see what upgrade or remodel comes next (:
I recently bought a 2017 Mazda 6 Sport for a fairly good price after totaling my 2013 Sonata in the rain. I must say it's a very nice car in terms of interior and exterior looks, and I don't even have the GT face or headlights. It's a nice tight and agile car. HOWEVER, comparing it to my 13 Sonata, the car does seem slightly louder, and indeed a good amount bumpier with its assumingly stiffer suspension. 3 or 4 years ago I would not mind it, but now on my 5th year of commuting 25-31 miles a day to college, I appreciate the softer and slightly quieter cabin on the Sonata. It surprises me that the Mazda being a better quality brand and newer car, had similar cabin sound, while I can understand the bumpier ride. However I think it's mostly wind and tire noise rather than lack on insulation. I'm not sure. Only other negative I can give it is the lack of storage. Also the Sonata for some reason had an incredibly sensitive gas pedal, giving it a very peppy acceleration, but I think it was a fluke because almost every other car in the segment doesn't have that feeling, even the 2017 Sonata. And another negative would be lack of Android Auto/Apple Carplay but that can be added with a software update. But overall I'm happy with the car.
I test drove a used 2016 Mazda 6 Sport. After the test drive, I looked at the salesman and said, "shutup and take my f'ing money!" Traded in my 2013 fully modded Subaru Impreza and never looked back. What a fun car! I really don't want to mod it either, because it's perfectly balanced with really nothing lacking. Yeah, I could mod it for more power, but this car feels great through the power band. Just pulls and pulls and pulls until it shifts. Couldn't ask for more in a daily driver!
@@TainaTaylorBlogs1 - Loved my mazda6 and mazda as a company, and just recently traded her in for a new Turbo Mazda CX-30. Mazda seems to be a really good car company. I never had an issue with the Mazda 6, I just wanted to upgrade and be able to comfortably drive in the Oregon snow. I still catch myself looking at the older and newer Mazda6's as they are just a really nice looking car
This is my favorite midsize sedan under $40,000. Once the new turbocharged 4 cylinder from the Mazda CX-9 is made available for the Mazda6 I'm sure this car will sell better.
It's funny how some people complain about the 6 not having a more powerful engine option, yet when Mazda did offer a v6 on the previous generation of 6 next to no one bought one.
KentB27 IMO, this is peak Mazda 6 so far in design, quality, and dynamics. The first generation was nice but Mazda wasn't all there in quality yet and it was a weird tweener between midsize and compact class and the 2nd gen was a watered down for the US anonymous blob. It kind of hurts how Mazda has it down close to perfection only minus being a lack of power. They should bring back a Mazdaspeed version or at least give it power.
Mr. Hand I've heard rumors that Mazda will be addressing the power issue with the next generation of 6 but you never know because Mazda tends to be pretty tight lipped compared to other manufacturers.
Mazda is still a relatively small company, so I'm not sure if they can extend the resources to have multiple engine options like other competitors, at least at this juncture. I hope they do, I think as a whole , the brand is the best looking compared to their competitors.
+ericj305 This current generation of 6 is still the slowest selling car in the midsize sedan segment so it's not going to suddenly be a hot seller with a more powerful engine either. Mazda's biggest problems holding them back from sales are poor brand awareness, mediocre brand perception, limited money for marketing and advertising, and a small dealer network. I think they're making strides in the right direction though. The new CX-9 is probably the nicest car they've ever made.
I’ve had this car for about 9 months and getting close to 10k miles. My total mpg average is 28.6 I drive mostly in the city. The car is great (not perfect), but really fun to drive.
Purchased a 2017 Mazda 6 in August after owning two other Mazda's since 1991. Great cars if you take care of them. The new 6 gets 42- 45 mpg at 65 mph . In city Avg 31 mpg , for a large car this is awesome!
Steve, your reviews are great as always! Some reviewers never criticize automakers . You seem to be an honest , well informed car critic. And that's greatly appreciated! Always look forward to your reviews. Thanks as always!!!
All you people talking about more power, Apple car play, blah sound just like the people around me that keep buying Fords, Dodges, etc for those reasons, and then complain ‘cause your car’s in the shop more often than you get to drive it. All the while, I’m driving my Mazdas problem free, having fun, and still have plenty $$ ‘cause I’m getting twice as much mpg. Lmfao! You know, a wise man once told me, “It’s fun to drive a slow car fast, but it sure as hell isn’t fun to drive a fast car slow.” Have fun paying off your speeding tickets, boys. :P
I love my 2014 Mazda 6 touring and it still averages 33 mpg with mixed city and hwy after 90K on it. I will probably buy a new one when Apple car play replaces that horrible infotainment screen.
We bought our 2017.5 6 at the beginning of 2018 and it had 5K miles on it because it was a salesman car now it was like brand new and we paid only 22K not bad for what the car has and two weeks ago we took it on a trip and we got 34 mpg which is awesome and it’s so much fun to drive I give it a five star rating.
Gorgeous car. As you said, I wish that Mazda puts out a more powerful engine. The current on sounds pretty bad. The driving dynamics outpaces the power. If they added a V6 to the lineup, I'm sold!
A coworker owns one of these. As a joke, he started parking next to another coworker who parks his 5 Series at the end of the lot by itself. But honestly, it does not look out of place next to the beemer. Shame about the drive train though.
I don't know why but the tested Mazda 6 in this video looks awesome, and indeed this is the one of my favorite sedan of all time. I just wish that I didn't trade in mine last year, so sad and miss it.
Billy Sou Yeah I don't know why Mazda decided to take out the choice to pick a higher performing engine. The last generation had a v6, they could at least add a turbo 4. Mazda is shying away from everything performance except the miata.
Heck, I dont even think we can except the Miata. Doesnt this new Miata have less power than the previous generation or am I mis-remembering that? Mazda is magic with driving dynamics but its like they have completely given up on being competitive on the horsepower front.
I heard from a few car journalist on podcast that mazda engineers mentioned the 2.5 turbo would fit in the 6 and 3, not sure howmany would option for that in the 6 etc, it seems more and more if not more people ask for certain options the automakers stop offering it.
I have watched tons of videos on this car and you are the only one that mentions the HUD. And to think i would've had to buy a HUD for the car. Thanks!!!!!
Need is a stupid argument. Why do you need more than 1 pair of shoes, 2 sets of clothes, a bed, TV or a car to start with? 300 hp is about fun, just because it's not your thing doesn't mean you get a say on what other people do.
Daniel Costa I actually took a look at the fusion sport the other day and it has not aged well. Mazda has the better style, interior and quality by a wide margin. Sure the Ford may have double the horsepower but it's also heavier and more cramped. Got back in my 6 and had no regrets.
Well, I disagree--I do not think the SkyActive approach will get better results than the hybrid approach. If MPG is your goal, hybrid/electric is the way to go. Performance and MPG improve. We are close to the limits of efficiency for a gas engine. Another thing I think is unusual about Mazda is that they are late implementing turbos. They have to do this because of the limits of the gasoline engine as they get smaller.
Steve really just 23mpg? You must be hammering it. Driving my 2014 nicely I get 35+ commuting and 32 if I'm enjoying myself a bit too much. That must be almost pure city and hills driving.
I own a 2016 Mazda 6 so mine doesn't have the G-Vectoring Control but handling is still good. I own a Touring model as I wanted the 6-speed manual, something not offered with the Grand Touring.
Thanks, Steve. Another great review. Great to see Mazda continuing to water its tiny garden. Did you perceive any real benefit from Mazda's effort to reduce interior noise?
Look at the tire reviews for the 6 not a great tire at all, i changed tire for my 6 and it's a bit better, but best if you put on aAs/3 michelin pilot sport.
I'm guessing because there is no need. I'm not aware of anything that I cannot do as a result of not having Carplay. Mazda connect seems to do it all, and we can stream anything from our phones, including youtube and spotify. Why pay Apple to their rip off shit when it doesn't add anything? I could be wrong.......
It functions to play the music stored on your phone, by accessing your contacts so that you can make calls and send text without using your hands--just verbal commands, by letting you access your maps and the info you have stored there using Siri and voice commands
Steve- I am on the fence and can't decide between mazda 6 and ford fusion 2.0L turbo. I know the MPG is poor on fusion but I'm a bit concerned about how loud the Mazda is. Which one would you pick?
Thanks for the reply. I know I'm asking too much but it's a big decision. How reliable are the fords and how's the real world mileage? Thanks in advance.
how cold was it outside? doesn't the ECU "add" extra fuel to bring engine/cat temps to operating levels sooner? Winter temps and winter gas can knock about 10% off the top; I go from 30mpg in th summer to 26-27 in the winter
You cannot trust these reviews--drive the car yourself and then voice an opinion. This car is definitely not the best driving car in the segment unless maybe the segment with no power and no torque and no 6 cylinder and no awd, dated styling, too high price, and a poor dealer support network.
Buchanan If you haven't driven the new Elantra Sport, please do. You will see the direction Hyundai is going. If you remember the early Hondas and Toyotas faced similar criticism. I completly understand yno1978's point. I like driving and want to control the car myself. While I see the advantage of some of the tech, autonomous cars are not for me. Hyundai is a car company on the verge of changing the way you and others think about their brand and it won't be long.
I was under the impression Mazda received approval for using their diesel engines in this car. Is that not on the horizon? And why not use the CX-9 motor in this?
Mazda is literally killing me . They are taking too long to include the 2.5 skyactiv turbo across all their model lines. They're definitely not listening to their customers. They supposedly want to move upscale but they are more known for sportiness , why not cement that first then move upscale. That strategy is a failure if you ask me.
I really wish Mazda would build a sportscar with some power. Having the Miata is nice but there is a large portion of the enthusiast community that wants more than 150hp. TTV6 RWD Mazda 6 coupe or similar would be great. It’s too bad the most fun mainstream car building company can’t afford to build a sportscar.
SS S The late 80s and 90s were the days where they gave or at least tried to give a variety of different cars to different people .... Now it's all about tech.
I'm in the market for a mid-size sedan. I'm hard pressed to fork over 32K for something without a V6 or turbo and gets *worse* gas mileage than the 2016 version. Ick! (And not for nothing, the engine in my 21yr old Contour, 165,000 miles, sounds quieter & smoother than that jar of marbles 4 banger.)
Hello Friends. I'm blogging today because I still have car obscessions. I bought an accord touring six months ago, a black 2017 model. Great Car. But I'm still glued to youtube and wonder if there's something better. I still hit the same dead ends I hit when researching. I didn't know about the Taurus SHO until yesterday. But perhaps there will be a fusion SHO? What is my point friends? Especially to Tragic HIP HOP? I would put off buying a car as long as possible, for your dream car may come out in the next three or four years. Hope this helps.
If you drive it hard, of course the gas mileage won't be close to the 'ratings'. I have a 2010 Mazda3s. Has the old 2.5L (pre-Skyactiv) in it and it's a hoot to drive. And, I drive it very hard. I average about 17.5 MPG mostly in the city. For a 4 door, smallish 4-cylinder car. I would imagine a newer Corvette probably gets better gas mileage. I guess I don't care. Gas is cheap. Fun is priceless. At least when you're driving with me. :)
From my friends at Mazda...As a software-only piece, yes, technically it could be added to most SKYACTIV Mazdas from 2013/14 and on. But, that doesn’t really consider the rest of the vehicle. First and foremost, the EPA and/or the U.S. DOT allow for tampering of an ECU unless it falls under compliance. Secondly, in much of the vehicles with GVC, there have been tweaks to the suspension to complement the technology. The Mazda6 didn’t need any suspension adjustments, which is why we could do our media evaluation program with them (with an on/off button). The 2017 Mazda3 has a completely different suspension from the 2016 model. More tweaks will be coming throughout each successive model to make sure GVC works in harmony with the vehicle.
JC 93 Hardly laughable. Okay, so it could use a sportier version, but in a car that weighs about 1400 kg, that's enough to set you from 0-100 km/h in 7 seconds and maybe a bit less.
I agree-that this is your taste. But not sure it is laughable for a whole lot of people who appreciate her, just as she stands. They want the mpg's and don't have the led foot that you (and I) have.
Sounds like a broken record--nice car, poor infotainment, poor display, no Apple Carplay, no Android Auto, its underpowered, no torque, mpg is overrated, sexy, loud interior, Skyactive, blah, blah, blah. That doesn't sound like a good car to me. I drove one 2-3 years ago and had the same complaints about the car as this reviewer has. Nothing has changed. Just build one car that is like we want and let the chips fall where they may. Quit chasing higher mpg and build one damn car that performs!
If you would drive the vehicle as it was intended to be driven then you would notice a difference. Mazda vehicles are meant to be driven hard. Revved high. That's where the torque is. I have a 3 and 6 (both older with less HP than the newest models on the market). And yet somehow I'm always leading the pack. Triple digits are very easy to get to in both the 3 and 6 that I have. As you know, getting caught at those speeds = no license for awhile. And yet you think that's slow? And more refined? If a nice leather interior with all kinds of tech goodies (as the newer Mazda vehicles have) isn't plush enough for your butt go buy a boring Buick or Cadillac. As for me, I'm a Mazda fan for life. I was meant to drive. And that's how/what I drive.
Mazda3: 2.5 L-184 HP and 185 ft lb torque @ 3250 rpms. Elantra Sport: 1.6 GDI- 201 HP and 195 ft lb torque @ 1500-4500 rpms. Point is the Elantra has a smaller engine and produces more HP and more torque at a much lower rpm. It will leave the 3 in the dust. The difference is Skyactive thinking sucks. Mazda is trying to catch up with their new 2.5 turbo. And I hope they do.
We have the 2016 model and love it, but this GVC bullshit sounds like a gimmick. All automakers keep pumping out useless shit to keep us buying. Adjusting the torque to corner better, but imperceptible to the driver??? This might help morons that can't drive, but it sound like BS to me. Buy the car because it a good car.....screw all this Playstation type BS
I'm driving it right now because my 2012 VW gti in service. worst brakes ever. it's like Toyota. my head keeps hitting the upper roof when getting out/in the car. buttons in steering wheel are not friendly to use. and plastic plastic time of plastic inside
Meanwhile on another Car portal somebody revealed, that this fancy sounding "G vectoring control" gimmick is nothing more than the software applying the brakes for the various wheels. So no variable engine torgue as the promo material - and any random reporter - lies, but it simply presses the brakes on behalf of you, buddy! Even Mazda confessed, no extra ounce of hardware was inserted to the chassis, only software. Guess if that is true, how much sorcery can Mazda do to "variable engine torgue" that was not possible in the 2016 model-year? The result: engine torque is using fuel, and brake is used to stop the torque getting to the wheel. "Clever", "consumption-friendly" solution. The guy said that was the reason why the MPG increased (even if the increase was minimal) since previous model. That's for the BS any random reporter keeps saying, without really knowing what they are talking about when promoting any car. If that obvious BS was swallowed by the reporter without inducing brain-activity, how credible his other observations remain?
Mazda hasn't "confessed" anything. They, and thus I, were upfront that GVC was not a mechanical system but a piece of software. There's no shame there. I have no reason to not take the OEM at its word as to how it functions, and frankly, if the resultant goal is similarly achieved then...? And furthermore, how credible were the journalists who "believed" VW's and the EPA's greenhouse gas emissions and subsequent MPG ratings? During the week that we are the loaned the car are we supposed to disassemble the vehicle and individually test and inspect the components to see if they "measure up?" This just isn't realistic. I'm an auto critic not a conspiracy theory investigative reporter.
xikefocus Mazda is a driver's car, which is supposed to be done with two hands. Porsche refused to offer cup holders until about a decade ago. bmw armrests are equally pathetic. if you drive with your right elbow on the armrest, you should be driving an SUV, not a sporty sedan.
xikefocus I won't disagree, I'm not saying I like it that's just their rationale. BMW armrests have improved but they were dragged kicking and screaming by the competition. this car has nowhere near the performance to justify the lack of proper comforts, to that end I completely agree.
I've owned a 2016 GT for almost 2 years and the car just keeps getting better with age. I rarely notice any lack of power. And the engine has gotten more responsive as time has gone on. No doubt due to break in and the car learning my habits. Fuel economy has been good. Averaging 26 in mixed driving and over 30 on the highway. And I mostly use manual mode with the paddles. Not sure why the reviewer is getting poor mileage other than you must be hammering it harder than you realize. In fact, like other Mazdas I've owned this car wakes up when you hammer it. The biggest difference I've felt has been how settled and solid the handling has become. This car is a wonderful drive, composed and communicative. I rarely pay attention to marketing hyperbole, but Mazda's "Horse and rider" take line really does fit this cars overall personality and how connected I feel to it when I drive. Those who complain about Mazda not being more like Ford or other mainstream manufacturers, really need to zip it and buy from one of those other brands. In addition a to Amanti, Mazda also tried to compete with Toyota and Honda head on in the 90's- it did not go well because they tried being something they're not. I would also be all over a AWD with more power as well, but not at the detriment of the superb balance that Mazda has built into this gen 6.
i don't consider 26 mix that good especially since they claim 30mpg mix...i would probably go for the accord
Have a 2016. I'm getting 31 mpg in mixed, but mostly city traffic, driving. On open highway, getting 37-41.
PoliticallyINCorrect to be clear I did mention that 26 was in sport mode and by sport mode, using paddles and hammering it. So this isn't simply driving around in full auto.
ocramidajzj well said. I can relate to everything you said. I've had my 2015 Mazda 6 for 2 1/2 years. Superb and fun car. A hidden gem really.
Highly underrated but a realistic competitor to the Accord and the Camry. Beautiful to drive. Thanks for sharing!
Ye
I'm really leaning towards a 2017 Mazda 6 for my first car over any other car guys.. I DO NOT want something everybody has like a Honda, Toyota, Ford or even Chevy, etc. ... I want a GREAT car that is not as popular if you know what I mean...
What do you guys think?
Get it
Tragick Hip-Hop I got the gt with premium package. I love it!
Tragick Hip-Hop I got a lease, hopping there is a turbo in the next few years so I can trade it...
You should definitely go for it. I just got my Mazda6 two weeks ago and I love it. Sports mode is fantastic!
How much would that lease cost you in the end... is that 24 or 36 months??
Thinking about doing the same thing & wait out for the 2018/19/20 to see what upgrade or remodel comes next (:
I bought my 3rd Mazda 6 (2018 GT). Once you go Mazda you can never go back. It's such an awesome drive.
I recently bought a 2017 Mazda 6 Sport for a fairly good price after totaling my 2013 Sonata in the rain. I must say it's a very nice car in terms of interior and exterior looks, and I don't even have the GT face or headlights. It's a nice tight and agile car. HOWEVER, comparing it to my 13 Sonata, the car does seem slightly louder, and indeed a good amount bumpier with its assumingly stiffer suspension. 3 or 4 years ago I would not mind it, but now on my 5th year of commuting 25-31 miles a day to college, I appreciate the softer and slightly quieter cabin on the Sonata. It surprises me that the Mazda being a better quality brand and newer car, had similar cabin sound, while I can understand the bumpier ride. However I think it's mostly wind and tire noise rather than lack on insulation. I'm not sure. Only other negative I can give it is the lack of storage. Also the Sonata for some reason had an incredibly sensitive gas pedal, giving it a very peppy acceleration, but I think it was a fluke because almost every other car in the segment doesn't have that feeling, even the 2017 Sonata. And another negative would be lack of Android Auto/Apple Carplay but that can be added with a software update. But overall I'm happy with the car.
I test drove a used 2016 Mazda 6 Sport. After the test drive, I looked at the salesman and said, "shutup and take my f'ing money!" Traded in my 2013 fully modded Subaru Impreza and never looked back. What a fun car! I really don't want to mod it either, because it's perfectly balanced with really nothing lacking. Yeah, I could mod it for more power, but this car feels great through the power band. Just pulls and pulls and pulls until it shifts. Couldn't ask for more in a daily driver!
any updates?
@@TainaTaylorBlogs1 - Loved my mazda6 and mazda as a company, and just recently traded her in for a new Turbo Mazda CX-30. Mazda seems to be a really good car company. I never had an issue with the Mazda 6, I just wanted to upgrade and be able to comfortably drive in the Oregon snow. I still catch myself looking at the older and newer Mazda6's as they are just a really nice looking car
@@johnmac6389 thank you
This is my favorite midsize sedan under $40,000. Once the new turbocharged 4 cylinder from the Mazda CX-9 is made available for the Mazda6 I'm sure this car will sell better.
It's funny how some people complain about the 6 not having a more powerful engine option, yet when Mazda did offer a v6 on the previous generation of 6 next to no one bought one.
KentB27 IMO, this is peak Mazda 6 so far in design, quality, and dynamics. The first generation was nice but Mazda wasn't all there in quality yet and it was a weird tweener between midsize and compact class and the 2nd gen was a watered down for the US anonymous blob. It kind of hurts how Mazda has it down close to perfection only minus being a lack of power. They should bring back a Mazdaspeed version or at least give it power.
Mr. Hand I've heard rumors that Mazda will be addressing the power issue with the next generation of 6 but you never know because Mazda tends to be pretty tight lipped compared to other manufacturers.
Mazda is still a relatively small company, so I'm not sure if they can extend the resources to have multiple engine options like other competitors, at least at this juncture. I hope they do, I think as a whole , the brand is the best looking compared to their competitors.
THANK YOU!!
+ericj305 This current generation of 6 is still the slowest selling car in the midsize sedan segment so it's not going to suddenly be a hot seller with a more powerful engine either. Mazda's biggest problems holding them back from sales are poor brand awareness, mediocre brand perception, limited money for marketing and advertising, and a small dealer network. I think they're making strides in the right direction though. The new CX-9 is probably the nicest car they've ever made.
I’ve had this car for about 9 months and getting close to 10k miles. My total mpg average is 28.6 I drive mostly in the city. The car is great (not perfect), but really fun to drive.
I love my 2017 Mazda6 GT Premium that I picked up in November of 2016, after waiting for 3 months to arrive from Hiroshima plant in Japan.
Purchased a 2017 Mazda 6 in August after owning two other Mazda's since 1991. Great cars if you take care of them. The new 6 gets 42- 45 mpg at 65 mph . In city Avg 31 mpg , for a large car this is awesome!
It pains me how good this would be in Mazdaspeed trim.
Great review as always!
Wouldn't that be awesome?
You don't have to imagine it anymore. Get the turbo-charged '18 Mazda6!
Woooow
Don't know why but the Mazda 6 in soul red looks gorgeous in this video. Loving this car from the very beginning to the end!
Steve, your reviews are great as always! Some reviewers never criticize automakers . You seem to be an honest , well informed car critic. And that's greatly appreciated! Always look forward to your reviews. Thanks as always!!!
andre hart Thanks for the kind words!
All you people talking about more power, Apple car play, blah sound just like the people around me that keep buying Fords, Dodges, etc for those reasons, and then complain ‘cause your car’s in the shop more often than you get to drive it. All the while, I’m driving my Mazdas problem free, having fun, and still have plenty $$ ‘cause I’m getting twice as much mpg. Lmfao! You know, a wise man once told me, “It’s fun to drive a slow car fast, but it sure as hell isn’t fun to drive a fast car slow.” Have fun paying off your speeding tickets, boys. :P
Wish it had a v8
All this car is missing is the turbo , carplay and android auto.
Looks like the '18 model is your model to get then... they've addressed these concerns.
I love my 2014 Mazda 6 touring and it still averages 33 mpg with mixed city and hwy after 90K on it. I will probably buy a new one when Apple car play replaces that horrible infotainment screen.
We bought our 2017.5 6 at the beginning of 2018 and it had 5K miles on it because it was a salesman car now it was like brand new and we paid only 22K not bad for what the car has and two weeks ago we took it on a trip and we got 34 mpg which is awesome and it’s so much fun to drive I give it a five star rating.
Gorgeous car. As you said, I wish that Mazda puts out a more powerful engine. The current on sounds pretty bad. The driving dynamics outpaces the power. If they added a V6 to the lineup, I'm sold!
A coworker owns one of these. As a joke, he started parking next to another coworker who parks his 5 Series at the end of the lot by itself. But honestly, it does not look out of place next to the beemer. Shame about the drive train though.
I don't know why but the tested Mazda 6 in this video looks awesome, and indeed this is the one of my favorite sedan of all time. I just wish that I didn't trade in mine last year, so sad and miss it.
Think the turbo Inline-4 that's in the CX-9 work here in the 6? I think so...
I wish they would!
Billy Sou Yeah I don't know why Mazda decided to take out the choice to pick a higher performing engine. The last generation had a v6, they could at least add a turbo 4. Mazda is shying away from everything performance except the miata.
Heck, I dont even think we can except the Miata. Doesnt this new Miata have less power than the previous generation or am I mis-remembering that? Mazda is magic with driving dynamics but its like they have completely given up on being competitive on the horsepower front.
I heard from a few car journalist on podcast that mazda engineers mentioned the 2.5 turbo would fit in the 6 and 3, not sure howmany would option for that in the 6 etc, it seems more and more if not more people ask for certain options the automakers stop offering it.
Hunter Jackson
Also, Mazda is focused on fuel efficiency just as much as driving experience.
Exterior and interior is one of the best out there in this price range. So sexy and high class.
I have watched tons of videos on this car and you are the only one that mentions the HUD. And to think i would've had to buy a HUD for the car. Thanks!!!!!
Thanks!
If they made an AWD V6 (300hp) I'd be all over that car.
Realistically, why and when would you, or anyone, "need" 300hp??
Need is a stupid argument. Why do you need more than 1 pair of shoes, 2 sets of clothes, a bed, TV or a car to start with? 300 hp is about fun, just because it's not your thing doesn't mean you get a say on what other people do.
Who said anything about telling other people what to do? lol
Daniel Costa I actually took a look at the fusion sport the other day and it has not aged well. Mazda has the better style, interior and quality by a wide margin. Sure the Ford may have double the horsepower but it's also heavier and more cramped. Got back in my 6 and had no regrets.
Well, I disagree--I do not think the SkyActive approach will get better results than the hybrid approach. If MPG is your goal, hybrid/electric is the way to go. Performance and MPG improve. We are close to the limits of efficiency for a gas engine.
Another thing I think is unusual about Mazda is that they are late implementing turbos. They have to do this because of the limits of the gasoline engine as they get smaller.
Steve really just 23mpg? You must be hammering it. Driving my 2014 nicely I get 35+ commuting and 32 if I'm enjoying myself a bit too much. That must be almost pure city and hills driving.
I know...I don't get it because I'm not driving it like mad.
Mazda are always evolving.Love to have this or the CX5
Really good review...I was just looking at this car (2015 model) today in London, UK ... Very nice
I own a 2016 Mazda 6 so mine doesn't have the G-Vectoring Control but handling is still good. I own a Touring model as I wanted the 6-speed manual, something not offered with the Grand Touring.
calling it now, best in class.
Justin Bouche ... Until the 2018 Toyota Camry arrives.
It's still ugly
Thanks, Steve. Another great review. Great to see Mazda continuing to water its tiny garden. Did you perceive any real benefit from Mazda's effort to reduce interior noise?
Yes. Because last year's tester had improved sound insulation too and I still found it to be a tad noisy. This is noticeably better.
Look at the tire reviews for the 6 not a great tire at all, i changed tire for my 6 and it's a bit better, but best if you put on aAs/3 michelin pilot sport.
Andrew8126 u in
I don"t understand why Mazda do not offert Apple CarPlay
I'm guessing because there is no need. I'm not aware of anything that I cannot do as a result of not having Carplay. Mazda connect seems to do it all, and we can stream anything from our phones, including youtube and spotify. Why pay Apple to their rip off shit when it doesn't add anything? I could be wrong.......
It functions to play the music stored on your phone, by accessing your contacts so that you can make calls and send text without using your hands--just verbal commands, by letting you access your maps and the info you have stored there using Siri and voice commands
They say that they have a contract with another company until 2019 when they'll launch the new model.
RWD that car then I'd be one of the new customers they will have.
Steve- I am on the fence and can't decide between mazda 6 and ford fusion 2.0L turbo. I know the MPG is poor on fusion but I'm a bit concerned about how loud the Mazda is. Which one would you pick?
I'd probably take the Ford...I like the added power and better infotainment.
Thanks for the reply. I know I'm asking too much but it's a big decision. How reliable are the fords and how's the real world mileage? Thanks in advance.
but what if you love that tug and pull when you put the pedal to the floor
Do you have a background in the news industry? Awesome presentation!
Thanks! Indeed I do. I was a weatherman for about 10 years.
Why can you not get a Mazda platinum petroleum version for this car?
Hey Steve. Is there a reason why you haven't reviewed the Mazda 3 with the 2.5L? I'd definitely love to hear your thoughts on that car.
It's been almost a couple of years since I've reviewed a MAZDA3...I'll see if I can order one with the 2.5L. Thanks.
Again, great review. Steve, do you know if the heads up display is retractable?
Yes. It opens and closes with the ignition. Thanks.
I really want this in the red but I'm worried about them staining from the dye in clothing. Does anybody know if this model will stain?
That's so strange your mpg totals were that low. I've consistently been averaging 32-33 in mixed driving.
2 years in a row...and last year's tester had i-eloop. Can't figure it out.
You were probably driving it a bit too hard.
chancy319 Not overly, really. Not enough to knock 5 mpgs off I don't think.
TestDriveNow Reviews by Auto Critic Steve Hammes I recall Dave Ericsson had a similar experience with the 2016 model as well, so you're not alone.
how cold was it outside? doesn't the ECU "add" extra fuel to bring engine/cat temps to operating levels sooner? Winter temps and winter gas can knock about 10% off the top; I go from 30mpg in th summer to 26-27 in the winter
I don't want the car driving me....I want to drive the car.
You cannot trust these reviews--drive the car yourself and then voice an opinion. This car is definitely not the best driving car in the segment unless maybe the segment with no power and no torque and no 6 cylinder and no awd, dated styling, too high price, and a poor dealer support network.
You are hilarious. You are what some folks could call a hater... and that's it. Go buy a piss poor Hyundai, dude.
Buchanan If you haven't driven the new Elantra Sport, please do. You will see the direction Hyundai is going. If you remember the early Hondas and Toyotas faced similar criticism. I completly understand yno1978's point. I like driving and want to control the car myself. While I see the advantage of some of the tech, autonomous cars are not for me. Hyundai is a car company on the verge of changing the way you and others think about their brand and it won't be long.
I was under the impression Mazda received approval for using their diesel engines in this car. Is that not on the horizon? And why not use the CX-9 motor in this?
They've been talking about bringing a diesel to our shores for YEARS...I'll believe it when I see it.
Jeff Ross I suspect that we won't see either of those things until the next generation of 6 and even then neither of them are a guarantee.
TestDriveNow Reviews by Auto Critic Steve Hammes Especially now that a gasoline compression engine seems to be on the way.
Mazda is literally killing me . They are taking too long to include the 2.5 skyactiv turbo across all their model lines. They're definitely not listening to their customers. They supposedly want to move upscale but they are more known for sportiness , why not cement that first then move upscale. That strategy is a failure if you ask me.
How hard is it to add carplay?
It must depend on who and how you drive the car. I get from 30.5 to 32.0 mpg. And I drive fast.
I really wish Mazda would build a sportscar with some power. Having the Miata is nice but there is a large portion of the enthusiast community that wants more than 150hp. TTV6 RWD Mazda 6 coupe or similar would be great. It’s too bad the most fun mainstream car building company can’t afford to build a sportscar.
SS S The late 80s and 90s were the days where they gave or at least tried to give a variety of different cars to different people .... Now it's all about tech.
SS S People don't buy V6. Please stop pretending as if people actually buy V6 engines
I'm in the market for a mid-size sedan. I'm hard pressed to fork over 32K for something without a V6 or turbo and gets *worse* gas mileage than the 2016 version. Ick! (And not for nothing, the engine in my 21yr old Contour, 165,000 miles, sounds quieter & smoother than that jar of marbles 4 banger.)
Get a used V6 Honda Accord Touring, you won't regret!
I literally have the same car! Love mine!
Such a beautiful car.
Hello Friends. I'm blogging today because I still have car obscessions. I bought an accord touring six months ago, a black 2017 model. Great Car. But I'm still glued to youtube and wonder if there's something better. I still hit the same dead ends I hit when researching. I didn't know about the Taurus SHO until yesterday. But perhaps there will be a fusion SHO? What is my point friends? Especially to Tragic HIP HOP? I would put off buying a car as long as possible, for your dream car may come out in the next three or four years. Hope this helps.
If you drive it hard, of course the gas mileage won't be close to the 'ratings'.
I have a 2010 Mazda3s. Has the old 2.5L (pre-Skyactiv) in it and it's a hoot to drive. And, I drive it very hard. I average about 17.5 MPG mostly in the city. For a 4 door, smallish 4-cylinder car. I would imagine a newer Corvette probably gets better gas mileage.
I guess I don't care. Gas is cheap. Fun is priceless. At least when you're driving with me. :)
Nice. Does GVC work with manual transmission?
Indeed it does.
don't know if mazda really has a model that anyone lusts after
if is a software, can you add it to older Mazdas? like a 2015 Mazda 3?
That's a great question. It's meant to work specifically with the SKYACTIV engines and chassis. I'll see if I can find you an answer.
TestDriveNow Reviews by Auto Critic Steve Hammes awesome great review.
From my friends at Mazda...As a software-only piece, yes, technically it could be added to most SKYACTIV Mazdas from 2013/14 and on.
But, that doesn’t really consider the rest of the vehicle. First and foremost, the EPA and/or the U.S. DOT allow for tampering of an ECU unless it falls under compliance.
Secondly, in much of the vehicles with GVC, there have been tweaks to the suspension to complement the technology. The Mazda6 didn’t need any suspension adjustments, which is why we could do our media evaluation program with them (with an on/off button). The 2017 Mazda3 has a completely different suspension from the 2016 model. More tweaks will be coming throughout each successive model to make sure GVC works in harmony with the vehicle.
Just drop the 2,5L Turbo Skyactive-G engine of the cx-9 in the 3 and the 6. Packages are all exactly the same. If possible add awd. Case closed.
Jeesh Steve, all the way out in Berne for this one huh? :P
Scott Villeneuve Have car, will travel 😂
My god that 6 in soul red with white interior shames some near luxury even luxury cars.
Steve, has Mazda abandoned the i-Eloop?
No. It's part of an option package that helps it get a couple of more MPGs.
This Soul Red paint is a nightmare for smart repair companies when repairing small damages - just something to keep in mind folks.
CardFreak999 why ?
It's a very difficult colour to match when doing a local repair.
Just copped a 2017 Mazda 6 Sport for $14.3k
Fucking stoked
Always reminds me of mr Ray driving
A great car without noble blood is still great.
I hope they make a coupe
Make a 280-300hp v6 and im sold
omg what is up with all these deprssessing smoking ads
Didn't mazda make a 6 with a v6
This car needs a V6 under the hood. That 4 cylinder with 184 hp is laughable. Offer a V6 and I would consider this car.
yes, because you need a v6 to go 70 mph in your bumfuck nowhere highways eh?
JC 93 Hardly laughable. Okay, so it could use a sportier version, but in a car that weighs about 1400 kg, that's enough to set you from 0-100 km/h in 7 seconds and maybe a bit less.
I agree-that this is your taste. But not sure it is laughable for a whole lot of people who appreciate her, just as she stands. They want the mpg's and don't have the led foot that you (and I) have.
Gorgeous car, but I paid the same for my new Maxima, but it has 300hp. Gee, I wonder why nobody buys this?...WAKE UP MAZDA!
Great car
Get that stupid info screen off the top of the dash board.
This is my car
Sounds like a broken record--nice car, poor infotainment, poor display, no Apple Carplay, no Android Auto, its underpowered, no torque, mpg is overrated, sexy, loud interior, Skyactive, blah, blah, blah. That doesn't sound like a good car to me. I drove one 2-3 years ago and had the same complaints about the car as this reviewer has. Nothing has changed. Just build one car that is like we want and let the chips fall where they may. Quit chasing higher mpg and build one damn car that performs!
If you would drive the vehicle as it was intended to be driven then you would notice a difference. Mazda vehicles are meant to be driven hard. Revved high. That's where the torque is. I have a 3 and 6 (both older with less HP than the newest models on the market). And yet somehow I'm always leading the pack. Triple digits are very easy to get to in both the 3 and 6 that I have. As you know, getting caught at those speeds = no license for awhile. And yet you think that's slow?
And more refined? If a nice leather interior with all kinds of tech goodies (as the newer Mazda vehicles have) isn't plush enough for your butt go buy a boring Buick or Cadillac.
As for me, I'm a Mazda fan for life. I was meant to drive. And that's how/what I drive.
Mazda3: 2.5 L-184 HP and 185 ft lb torque @ 3250 rpms. Elantra Sport: 1.6 GDI- 201 HP and 195 ft lb torque @ 1500-4500 rpms. Point is the Elantra has a smaller engine and produces more HP and more torque at a much lower rpm. It will leave the 3 in the dust. The difference is Skyactive thinking sucks. Mazda is trying to catch up with their new 2.5 turbo. And I hope they do.
JCT3 I bet you that it won't beat Mazda to 0-60. Same as Honda accord and Toyota Camry 4 cylinder offerings
JCT3 shut the fuck up and test drive the car. Pretty sure you won't say another word
And unfortunately still no remote start
jalmonte91 That's true
I hate the bright transition effects
We have the 2016 model and love it, but this GVC bullshit sounds like a gimmick. All automakers keep pumping out useless shit to keep us buying. Adjusting the torque to corner better, but imperceptible to the driver??? This might help morons that can't drive, but it sound like BS to me. Buy the car because it a good car.....screw all this Playstation type BS
the car is nice but 32k.....thats a bit much. That price turned off my interest.
Used 24K under
Nice looking Marzda 🚗
We agree!
I only they have made V6 :(
Looks like advertising not review
Why? Because I didn’t hate it?
Not much change from 2016
Upin
The trunk logo was modified...looks like a bat
Çokhhh eyi araba gozüm yawww
I'm driving it right now because my 2012 VW gti in service. worst brakes ever. it's like Toyota. my head keeps hitting the upper roof when getting out/in the car. buttons in steering wheel are not friendly to use. and plastic plastic time of plastic inside
Meanwhile on another Car portal somebody revealed, that this fancy sounding "G vectoring control" gimmick is nothing more than the software applying the brakes for the various wheels. So no variable engine torgue as the promo material - and any random reporter - lies, but it simply presses the brakes on behalf of you, buddy! Even Mazda confessed, no extra ounce of hardware was inserted to the chassis, only software. Guess if that is true, how much sorcery can Mazda do to "variable engine torgue" that was not possible in the 2016 model-year? The result: engine torque is using fuel, and brake is used to stop the torque getting to the wheel. "Clever", "consumption-friendly" solution. The guy said that was the reason why the MPG increased (even if the increase was minimal) since previous model. That's for the BS any random reporter keeps saying, without really knowing what they are talking about when promoting any car. If that obvious BS was swallowed by the reporter without inducing brain-activity, how credible his other observations remain?
Mazda hasn't "confessed" anything. They, and thus I, were upfront that GVC was not a mechanical system but a piece of software. There's no shame there. I have no reason to not take the OEM at its word as to how it functions, and frankly, if the resultant goal is similarly achieved then...? And furthermore, how credible were the journalists who "believed" VW's and the EPA's greenhouse gas emissions and subsequent MPG ratings? During the week that we are the loaned the car are we supposed to disassemble the vehicle and individually test and inspect the components to see if they "measure up?" This just isn't realistic. I'm an auto critic not a conspiracy theory investigative reporter.
sexy ass car
pj masks
Super fun to drive ! . Hmm, how about you actually drive it . You know; a MANUAL. Jeez .
That armrest is useless!
xikefocus Mazda is a driver's car, which is supposed to be done with two hands. Porsche refused to offer cup holders until about a decade ago. bmw armrests are equally pathetic. if you drive with your right elbow on the armrest, you should be driving an SUV, not a sporty sedan.
BMW armrest is better. Mazda 6 is a daily driver sport sedan, should offer decent comfort.
xikefocus I won't disagree, I'm not saying I like it that's just their rationale. BMW armrests have improved but they were dragged kicking and screaming by the competition. this car has nowhere near the performance to justify the lack of proper comforts, to that end I completely agree.
జ్ఞా
Love how the exterior looks but the interior looks soo cheap.. :/
Just a copy of BMW 3 series lol