Great Job. This game is amazing assuming all players understand this logic. Anyone that doesn't understand it has no chance of winning and will get frustrated afterwards once they realize how bad they screwed up mid game. It's tough to recover once deduction mistakes have made it to your sheet.
Thank you Brent. Ha yes thats true, mistake could be fatal. Would need to try the best at the deduction part. Was the inspiration to make this video anyway. Thanka for the visit
This is such an outstanding explanation of the logic. At first at 7:39, with the ambiguous negative blue/red result from the potion sale, I was thinking that this meant that neither the fern nor the scorpion could be negative green because they failed to combine to make a paralysis potion (negative green), but this is not the case. They simply can't both be negative green and of different size, but that in itself doesn't remove any possibilities from the columns since the table is not a table of combinations, and the table cells are repeated along each row. Your explanation set me straight! :-) Many thanks.
Thanks so much Jon! This is indeed an important part of the game, we want to share to others so you can enjoy the game even more! Thank you for watching and the kind words!
thank you thank you thank you! I just replayed alchemists after 5 years, and this video was super helpful for me to remember the game and teaching it to my wife!
Kudos to yall Meeple University! Excellent breakdown on the logic puzzle! Henceforth, I will seriously consider using this video when I table Alchemists in the future!
Any advice for selling potions for information? I understand that it seems *super* bad to sell an exact potion you already know, because gaining grid information is more important in the long run than gaining maximum gold for a sale.
Great video! You're amazing at explaining step-by-step logical deduction on this game. I've a question. At 12:00, how could poison potion (-Red) from combining fern and bird claw appear on deduction board?
@@MeepleUniversity I'm having trouble understanding the idea of hedged publishing. At a bit before the 12:00 mark you said you could publish but hedge the green aspect. However, the red aspect on the two possibilities were different sizes, so at the end of the game you could still be wrong.
@@chuckawade1 Chuck, all you need to know to publish theories is whether a colour is positive or negative; you don't need to know the size. (Or, in other words, when you check at the end, if you've picked a hedge chemical of the correct +/- but the wrong size, you're still considered correct).
Thank you, this is a great video for a great game. I had already enjoyed the previous video you posted on the same topic. May I ask what was the reason for you to film a second one? All the best, Paolo
This is a better version of it. Let say version2.0 - the older one has shaky camera, not so good sound. And it has quite a few views so we feel a little embarrassed of the quality of the old one. Hence this one :) Thank you Paolo!
Hi Claudia! Hahaha that's why I watch this video several times before playing. Tarrant shows what I wouldn't even think lol. Thank you for dropping by. Stella
Hi everyone, what is your favorite puzzle deduction game?
Thanks for watching! Stella
Just wow! I had no clue you were able to deduct that much!
Right! I had no clue either till Tarrant told me! 😆
Stella.
Great Job. This game is amazing assuming all players understand this logic. Anyone that doesn't understand it has no chance of winning and will get frustrated afterwards once they realize how bad they screwed up mid game. It's tough to recover once deduction mistakes have made it to your sheet.
Thank you Brent. Ha yes thats true, mistake could be fatal. Would need to try the best at the deduction part. Was the inspiration to make this video anyway. Thanka for the visit
This is such an outstanding explanation of the logic. At first at 7:39, with the ambiguous negative blue/red result from the potion sale, I was thinking that this meant that neither the fern nor the scorpion could be negative green because they failed to combine to make a paralysis potion (negative green), but this is not the case. They simply can't both be negative green and of different size, but that in itself doesn't remove any possibilities from the columns since the table is not a table of combinations, and the table cells are repeated along each row. Your explanation set me straight! :-) Many thanks.
Thanks so much Jon! This is indeed an important part of the game, we want to share to others so you can enjoy the game even more! Thank you for watching and the kind words!
10:00 you didn't need to add new letters, you could have just re-used B and H in the feather column
Great video! You've done the best job I've seen explaining the logic of this game!
Thanks so much Adam :D
thank you thank you thank you! I just replayed alchemists after 5 years, and this video was super helpful for me to remember the game and teaching it to my wife!
Oh nice! Glad this video is usefuly, thanks so much for sharing it! Hope you enjoy playing!🙏
Kudos to yall Meeple University! Excellent breakdown on the logic puzzle! Henceforth, I will seriously consider using this video when I table Alchemists in the future!
Wow thank you so much Ben(jamin)! Hehe do it!
I immediately bought this game from seeing your video. Thank you!
We're glad :D Hopefully this video helps with the puzzle deduction! Thank you for dropping by Keith!
This is such a good video. I love this game but had no idea of all the tips described here.
Glad you find it helpful! And now, go win the game ;P
Any advice for selling potions for information? I understand that it seems *super* bad to sell an exact potion you already know, because gaining grid information is more important in the long run than gaining maximum gold for a sale.
thanks for the video. it was very good
Thank you so much
Great video! You're amazing at explaining step-by-step logical deduction on this game.
I've a question. At 12:00, how could poison potion (-Red) from combining fern and bird claw appear on deduction board?
wow, I've been humbled...
Hope this is useful, friend!
I LOVE this game but it's so hard for me to get to the table.
YES agree. it is still get played thou coz it is unique like no others :)
This helped me a lot! Thank you!!
You're so welcome 😁👍
Really useful!! This video help us a lot :-) Thanks!!
We're glad, thanks so much for letting us know
Wonderful information!
Thanks so much 🙏🙏
this was such a good explanation, I'm hoping that my wife will play this with me again now.
Thank you Chuck! Glad it's useful. Have fun!
@@MeepleUniversity I'm having trouble understanding the idea of hedged publishing. At a bit before the 12:00 mark you said you could publish but hedge the green aspect. However, the red aspect on the two possibilities were different sizes, so at the end of the game you could still be wrong.
@@chuckawade1 Chuck, all you need to know to publish theories is whether a colour is positive or negative; you don't need to know the size. (Or, in other words, when you check at the end, if you've picked a hedge chemical of the correct +/- but the wrong size, you're still considered correct).
Thanks for the video that helped a lot
Yay glad it helped Andreas! Thanks for letting us know!
Thank you so much for this video! :)
Our pleasure :) Thanks so much for popping in here
Thank you, this is a great video for a great game. I had already enjoyed the previous video you posted on the same topic. May I ask what was the reason for you to film a second one? All the best, Paolo
This is a better version of it. Let say version2.0 - the older one has shaky camera, not so good sound. And it has quite a few views so we feel a little embarrassed of the quality of the old one. Hence this one :)
Thank you Paolo!
Excellent vid!
Thanks Chris! So you'll play this with us next? hehe
@@MeepleUniversity Yes! In person I hope :D
That's what we want😁
In this demo, what code did you use for the app?
Hi Silver! Oh gosh, tis been awhile... I dont remember, unless it's in the video. sorry friend
It shows DEMO on the app
This is legit
Thanks Christoph!
@@MeepleUniversity My thanks to you!
@Christoph 🙏😍🙏😍
You..cross this and that and then you know that you can cross this ....
Me.....dang....i see nothing
🙈🙈🙈😎😎😎😖😖😉
Hi Claudia! Hahaha that's why I watch this video several times before playing. Tarrant shows what I wouldn't even think lol.
Thank you for dropping by.
Stella