This interview was conducted with FRONTLINE during the making of our documentary “Zero Tolerance.” Watch the full film, here: th-cam.com/video/eW4kQ4akZ1A/w-d-xo.html
General theme of Comments section: If any portion of the interview isn't favorable to Trump it is biased or fake news. Meanwhile the Steve bannon interview was great
To anyone who cares....I have really been enjoying these interviews. I lean left but I am learning some stuff from the more right side interviewers. Any Right people out there enjoying some of the more liberal interviews? What I have mostly seen is pretty strong judgement from the Right people to the more liberal interviews. thoughts appreciated.
Glad to see you even caring enough to be open minded. The evangelical religion of the left forbids hearing both sides because of blasphemy. When a conservative hears these interviews, we wonder where the hard questions are for the left. This is a typical kangaroo court. The left controls all the questions, but doesnt ask anything that goes against their agenda. 1) how do open borders work in a welfare state? 2) why did your dads company cnn use obama picutes of kids in cages and say it was trump? 3) when you say amnesty reduces immigration, what study are you referring to? 4) who is paying for the logistics of the caravans? There are many trucks. 5) how does open borders benefit blue collar. The corporate left is very slanted to their agenda. I will eventually watch the documentary that cherry picks the most biased results from the most biased questions and probably come to the same conclusion. The internet has given power to the little guy. All news is fake until proven as truth. That is on both sides. But, the fake news is at least 4x greater from the left. Just look at the number of retraction.
It's sad the only response to this is someone basically saying "no." That being said, I didn't find this interviewee that compelling either. Maybe there would be more of a chance for a response on a different left-leaning interview (the Ben Rhodes interview in the Great Divide series comes to mind).
@@zacharysands741 this guy was boring and calm. Probably an analyst of some kind with the way his brain goes here and there. And yeah the guy above is... For a lack of words a Karen
This guy is described in the video as an Immigration Reporter for the New Yorker. Wonder which way his stories were slanted? @ 54:50 he says "and obviously Family Separation is unlike anything we've ever seen, in terms of just the absolute human horror of it..." Um….Yeah.... Whatever you say there, Johnny boi...
These Zero Tolerance interviews have been outstanding in my opinion...and then there is this one. The other interviews were capturing real, transparent conversations with people who are obviously expert in the events and circumstances which developed to create the current state of border issues. This interview however captures a spewing conflation of Blitzer's own limited opinion which appears to be based in headline-speak. Absolute rubbish.
Yeah benefits. . Like when the Salvadorian refugees who started MS 13 in LA thereby influencing a whole new genre of crime movie - with violent, misunderstood, murdering heroes who where really nice guys until the white man's racism gave them no choice but to traffic and kill for a living - coming soon to a theater near you.
I was enjoying the Frontline "Zero Tolerance" series, until this slanted hit piece. Just imagine calling the people working with Obama, "those guys" or as Jonathan wardled, "the cabal" and the "Far Right". All terms used in the pejorative , which turned this conversation into little more than a brushstroke of yellow. Really, is this how objective journalism manifests itself on the fashionable Left?
Like yourself this was the first of the episodes of this series that I have seen that included somewhat unpalatable material. I'm not in favor of transferring 'First we kill all the lawyers' over to journalists however. On the freedom-equality spectrum he appears to me leaning more to the latter. An elite, married with a child, a Fulbright scholar and the son of Wolf; I'm for his intelligent contributions. I think he's is no more correct than others about the morality of political actions. Obviously, some of his assertions/assumptions fly in the face of common sense. As other journalists, he makes a contribution to our knowledge of history. I'd say Frontline would probably defend itself by saying that others with opposing views have been given their platform. I prefer that we keep talking, although preferably not about civil war.
Blitzer states that family separation is “unlike anything we’ve ever seen” - his understanding of American history is sorely lacking - during slavery we separated black families and after we subjugated Native peoples we separated their families. Sessions reminds me of Cheney, who justified torture utterly without apology -- we’ve been here before .... many times ... many, many times ... Ok, so this is a cynical post, a deeply cynical post ... apologies ... my Mexican grandmother was illegal, and my mom is Navajo, and so this is personal ...
@@geoh1896 you mean the common american worker shouldnt have a voice. Only oxford types are in touch with americans. Yeah right. Im tired of the broken promises.
This interview was conducted with FRONTLINE during the making of our documentary “Zero Tolerance.” Watch the full film, here: th-cam.com/video/eW4kQ4akZ1A/w-d-xo.html
Frontline's series of excellent interviews are so raw, informative, addictive. Well done👏👏👏
Thank you PBS for the invaluable work you do🙏🙏🙏
General theme of Comments section:
If any portion of the interview isn't favorable to Trump it is biased or fake news.
Meanwhile the Steve bannon interview was great
You see that Bannon interview series? Loved it.
They are right wing woke
I’m only here bc it’s 1 hour 11 minutes and 11 seconds, I couldn’t resist such perfection
I am here coz its scary how much this guy looks like me
Fantastic reporting, shame this thread is full of trolls.
existentialvoid YAAAAAAAWN
White collar loves open borders. They get more customers. Blue collar pays the price.
To anyone who cares....I have really been enjoying these interviews. I lean left but I am learning some stuff from the more right side interviewers. Any Right people out there enjoying some of the more liberal interviews? What I have mostly seen is pretty strong judgement from the Right people to the more liberal interviews. thoughts appreciated.
Glad to see you even caring enough to be open minded. The evangelical religion of the left forbids hearing both sides because of blasphemy. When a conservative hears these interviews, we wonder where the hard questions are for the left. This is a typical kangaroo court. The left controls all the questions, but doesnt ask anything that goes against their agenda.
1) how do open borders work in a welfare state?
2) why did your dads company cnn use obama picutes of kids in cages and say it was trump?
3) when you say amnesty reduces immigration, what study are you referring to?
4) who is paying for the logistics of the caravans? There are many trucks.
5) how does open borders benefit blue collar.
The corporate left is very slanted to their agenda. I will eventually watch the documentary that cherry picks the most biased results from the most biased questions and probably come to the same conclusion. The internet has given power to the little guy. All news is fake until proven as truth. That is on both sides. But, the fake news is at least 4x greater from the left. Just look at the number of retraction.
It's sad the only response to this is someone basically saying "no." That being said, I didn't find this interviewee that compelling either. Maybe there would be more of a chance for a response on a different left-leaning interview (the Ben Rhodes interview in the Great Divide series comes to mind).
@@zacharysands741 this guy was boring and calm. Probably an analyst of some kind with the way his brain goes here and there.
And yeah the guy above is... For a lack of words a Karen
This guy is described in the video as an Immigration Reporter for the New Yorker. Wonder which way his stories were slanted?
@ 54:50 he says "and obviously Family Separation is unlike anything we've ever seen, in terms of just the absolute human horror of it..."
Um….Yeah.... Whatever you say there, Johnny boi...
What possible benefits could there be to settling Syrian refugees in the U.S.?
These Zero Tolerance interviews have been outstanding in my opinion...and then there is this one. The other interviews were capturing real, transparent conversations with people who are obviously expert in the events and circumstances which developed to create the current state of border issues. This interview however captures a spewing conflation of Blitzer's own limited opinion which appears to be based in headline-speak. Absolute rubbish.
It's not what is driving illegals out of their countries but the draw of all America offers.
Frontline, interview the silent majority. This series is one layer removed. It would be useful to see who had it right in the political arena.
Excellent suggestion. But I’m assuming that no one from the silent majority wants to come out from the shadows.
He does not come across as neutral or objective, so who would the sources of his information be? Fellow travelers.
These people see the world completely different.. Like the direct opposite
Elites vs surfs
@@NathansHVAC *serfs
BENEFITS TO BRINGING REFUGEES??....... yeah right.... like to see THAT balance sheet... what a crock
Yeah benefits. . Like when the Salvadorian refugees who started MS 13 in LA thereby influencing a whole new genre of crime movie - with violent, misunderstood, murdering heroes who where really nice guys until the white man's racism gave them no choice but to traffic and kill for a living - coming soon to a theater near you.
You can't see it because the President tore it up and flushed it down the Oval Office toilet!
These interviews have been obsessed with Steven Miller. It’s funny that since this video, numbers have drastically slowed down.
Where is the Stephen Miller interview????
excellent question. He still is in the White House, maybe he can't.
I was enjoying the Frontline "Zero Tolerance" series, until this slanted hit piece. Just imagine calling the people working with Obama, "those guys" or as Jonathan wardled, "the cabal" and the "Far Right". All terms used in the pejorative , which turned this conversation into little more than a brushstroke of yellow. Really, is this how objective journalism manifests itself on the fashionable Left?
Like yourself this was the first of the episodes of this series that I have seen that included somewhat unpalatable material. I'm not in favor of transferring 'First we kill all the lawyers' over to journalists however. On the freedom-equality spectrum he appears to me leaning more to the latter. An elite, married with a child, a Fulbright scholar and the son of Wolf; I'm for his intelligent contributions. I think he's is no more correct than others about the morality of political actions. Obviously, some of his assertions/assumptions fly in the face of common sense. As other journalists, he makes a contribution to our knowledge of history. I'd say Frontline would probably defend itself by saying that others with opposing views have been given their platform. I prefer that we keep talking, although preferably not about civil war.
I just clicked on this to see who this guy is and if I wanted to hear from him. No.
Now I'm gonging him.
Jonathan mind will be blown when he sees the 2020 election results
Is this wolf blitzers kid? If so he’s way smarter than his dad
This \
Dead silent on Israel’s gangster like colonialism and hyper white nationalism. HYPOCRITE!
Arman, how do you know what Blitzer would say about immigration to Israel? Have you asked him or sourced his other writings and innterviews?
@@SomeoneHasToSayIt2525 Israel is about the size of New Jersey, Belgium, or Wales. There is a wide spectrum of colors there. Get a grip.
Sessions hit man for far right wings side.
Blitzer states that family separation is “unlike anything we’ve ever seen” - his understanding of American history is sorely lacking - during slavery we separated black families and after we subjugated Native peoples we separated their families.
Sessions reminds me of Cheney, who justified torture utterly without apology -- we’ve been here before .... many times ... many, many times ...
Ok, so this is a cynical post, a deeply cynical post ... apologies ... my Mexican grandmother was illegal, and my mom is Navajo, and so this is personal ...
He’s a writer for the New Yorker he’s open borders guy
Is he the son of the infamous low IQ Wolf Blitzer?
Wolf Blitzers son. Say no more.
He is a corporate lefty.
Not his son.
It's scary of how much this guy looks like me... Remove that specs and those eyebrows straighter and that's me
Open boards we Americans died .
This guy do not know what he
Talking about.
All Hail Trump!
Jai Prakash Nagar You going to bow down and kiss his feet???
Praise Him!
Sathish My topic speak intrivew like it Gentleman'
They were awful people
The flaws in his assertions are to numerous to address in a comment so I'll just leave you with bwahaha!
He has a serious crush on Stephen Miller. Mr.Miller more accomplished at Communication than this "Reporter". lol
This guy is a Trump hater. He’s not the least bit objective. Don’t waste your time.
trump just isn't presidential material
@@geoh1896 you mean the common american worker shouldnt have a voice. Only oxford types are in touch with americans. Yeah right. Im tired of the broken promises.
@@NathansHVAC I feel you. I'm tired of Trumps broken promises too.
NYT beardo glasses... 3000 views lol
🤣