This is a great interview. I just wanted to offer a suggestion so that more people might watch it. Maybe you could change the title to something more descriptive, like "Frank Yeomans discusses personality disorders and splitting." The GMT20220317 and recording size could be information that is stored behind the scenes. Thank you.
This is the best explanation of BPD complications that I've ever seen or read. I wish it was available to more people. It turns a lot of confusion into understanding. Thank you for posting this!! Yeomans is brilliant.
My much older sister had BPD..She made my life miserable. I feel sad that it was not diagnosed prior to her death. I only, within the last six months, figured it out by myself via videos on You Tube. I agree that Yeoman knows what he's doing.
This is very interesting. Esp since media and tech often has financial investment in polarization of discourse (and exploiting associated emotions/behaviors) and w tech triggering very specific systems of rewards, impulsivity, etc, I would’ve looked at these things as a product of the world collectively being maybe more traumatized or self-focused (personality leanings influencing tech & media), but everything really is so dynamic and circular.. almost like giving a system energy just sets off a cycle of energy that feeds itself. Also, how much of personality is relational/situational and why and when does that or should that matter?
33:00 beautifully put, both the introspection and validation. Would be cool if the algorithm recognized commentor discernment from any demonstrated record as a way of scoring you guys for authenticity and integrity. That's a specific relative infrequency machine learning will never identify with as much precision otherwise. Pseudosentience can evade liability but what sentient intelligence would seek another party's profit at the expense of yet a third? To deploy envy hunger and greed in service of another sounds like AI with DPD LMFAO. AI can stimulate our base emotions but it can only try to predict our emotional responses to one another based on emotionless predictive analysis of our data. Which has been the reason for gathering it all. AI isn't even solving crimes. It's just advertising and undermining intellectual property. All of which is a reflection of its operators 🤢 (who, unlike its engineers, aren't bright enough to reason beyond the psychosis of thinking that shit's gonna become conscious--AND THINK LIKE THEM 🙄)🤯
My gosh Where were all you Practitioners when I needed help unraveling my anxiety neurosis? I'm delighted that you folks are helping your profession by doing these podcasts
@@derekpmoore Wau, duh, your logic is breathtaking. Imagine spending one hour of your time giving an interview on a very important subject, and the interviewer names it SDGFXCVDFFG55sdfDFG. Well done, and I'm sure you'll be able to say that your time was "well" spent. Perhaps it could reach much more people if the title said something to the subject. Franks has very good opinions that could reach more people if someone made a bit more effort.
Excellent video!!!
Great to hear 4 smart people.
This is a great interview. I just wanted to offer a suggestion so that more people might watch it. Maybe you could change the title to something more descriptive, like "Frank Yeomans discusses personality disorders and splitting." The GMT20220317 and recording size could be information that is stored behind the scenes. Thank you.
Can’t agree more
@@tatianahawaii13 I can
Great video. Found it by searching for the title. Best video from GMT20220317 so far
This is the best explanation of BPD complications that I've ever seen or read. I wish it was available to more people. It turns a lot of confusion into understanding. Thank you for posting this!! Yeomans is brilliant.
My much older sister had BPD..She made my life miserable. I feel sad that it was not diagnosed prior to her death. I only, within the last six months, figured it out by myself via videos on You Tube. I agree that Yeoman knows what he's doing.
Please change the title of the video. State the name of interviewee
Interesting, thanks for sharing
This is very interesting. Esp since media and tech often has financial investment in polarization of discourse (and exploiting associated emotions/behaviors) and w tech triggering very specific systems of rewards, impulsivity, etc, I would’ve looked at these things as a product of the world collectively being maybe more traumatized or self-focused (personality leanings influencing tech & media), but everything really is so dynamic and circular.. almost like giving a system energy just sets off a cycle of energy that feeds itself. Also, how much of personality is relational/situational and why and when does that or should that matter?
33:00 beautifully put, both the introspection and validation. Would be cool if the algorithm recognized commentor discernment from any demonstrated record as a way of scoring you guys for authenticity and integrity. That's a specific relative infrequency machine learning will never identify with as much precision otherwise.
Pseudosentience can evade liability but what sentient intelligence would seek another party's profit at the expense of yet a third? To deploy envy hunger and greed in service of another sounds like AI with DPD LMFAO.
AI can stimulate our base emotions but it can only try to predict our emotional responses to one another based on emotionless predictive analysis of our data. Which has been the reason for gathering it all. AI isn't even solving crimes. It's just advertising and undermining intellectual property. All of which is a reflection of its operators 🤢 (who, unlike its engineers, aren't bright enough to reason beyond the psychosis of thinking that shit's gonna become conscious--AND THINK LIKE THEM 🙄)🤯
interesting video ✅
Please change video title
They just refer you out.
My gosh Where were all you Practitioners when I needed help unraveling my anxiety neurosis?
I'm delighted that you folks are helping your profession by doing these podcasts
What's the point of uploading such video if you can't title it properly?
Uh, because then we have the video even if we don’t have a title. Duh.
@@derekpmoore Wau, duh, your logic is breathtaking. Imagine spending one hour of your time giving an interview on a very important subject, and the interviewer names it SDGFXCVDFFG55sdfDFG. Well done, and I'm sure you'll be able to say that your time was "well" spent. Perhaps it could reach much more people if the title said something to the subject. Franks has very good opinions that could reach more people if someone made a bit more effort.
@@TomeRodrigo apparently the comments make this video show up in the searches!