Got paid less and did more. This is why competition is important. WI did this with the highway program. They offered like 5 or 6 digits in bonus every day they got done early. They finished like 13 days early (on a decade long project) iL is still working on their stretch of the same highway.
Boeing adopted the McDonnell Douglas business model and immediately began to fail. Boeing has become an embarrassment to American ingenuity and quality.
Everything started to go wrong when everybody and his brother started adopting Jack Welch's approach to business-which was MD's playbook. There's a great critique of the damage Welch wrought in a book called: "The Man Who Broke Capitalism; How Jack Welch Gutted the Heartland and Crushed the Soul of Corporate America--And How to Undo His Legacy" by David Gelles.
@@forrestallison1879So youre tell me Boeing accept a contract by NASA for FREE?! Why do you think NASA selected Boeing in the first place if not due political influence? Boeing become a parasite corporation, thats a fact...
@@markschroter2640currently Starship has a negative payload. That might change with time but currently SLS Block 1 is the highest payload super heavy rocket.
Good thing 33,000 Boeing employees have bargained for an accumulated 36% raise over the next 4 years plus a 12,000$ one time bonus… Guess the lay offs will start shortly.
If Boeing had focused on paying their employees higher wages and retaining talent and safety precautions rather than lining shareholder profits, maybe they wouldn’t be in their current predicament.
@@mmandrewa2397 There was another anomaly on Starlink Group 9-3 in July, in which all the payloads were lost when the second stage had an oxygen leak and failed to relight for the circularization burn. Which makes 3 anomalies in one summer...only one was a mission failure, and it was "only" a starlink mission, but it is mildly concerning to have three issues in a short span. It suggests possible systemic or culture issues. They can correct, but it is worth some attention.
@@darylbardo these issues happening withing 1 month is an anomaly but not a strange one, you are bound to have more accidents when you launch more rockets than anyone else does.
Depends on what strings come attached. The division itself is just fine.. the problem is that their contracts require them to 'partner' with many other companies and use the parts they are told to use. they have very little control over what actually goes into their capsule... remove those requirements and you would likely have a pretty effective division.
neutron launch assuming it is 2 years from first engine test to booster integration, starship will be operational and may have completed the moon mission. But this is an observational conjecture.
the only active players in the space game is china and space X with isro and jaxa making some great crafts in like a 1-2 year timespan not that consistent tho.
Consider the admin (Elon😂) now is going to basically rubber stamp any spaceX launch, we can finally see Agile in hardware to the extreme. 4 years of rubber stamping with indefinite 4 years renew. But overall, FAA will probably be so throughoutly gutted by Elon that everyone can now launch. The golden age of American space age is here.
If you look at it from the POV of the ultra-strict requirements of spaceflight (even more so in *human* spaceflight), forget the case of when the thing isn't able to do things as predicted, NASA cancelled the return of Butch and Suni because Starliner wasn't able to have the required probability of success despite it coming back down pretty well.
Every single spacecraft I have ever seen reentering with four parachutes 3 will open first followed by the fourth. It's possible to get all four to open exactly at the same time there's hundreds of little variables that make it unlikely.
Weird video. The parachute is not even a problem. It's normal behaviour. The landing failure isn't even bad news. They have been landing hundreds of times for years. They have a single failure and it's troubling and problematic?. When any other company on earth can land a booster, then we could talk about that. Then we have two upper stage problems. These are the real concern, but that is what the high safety record SpaceX upholds shows. They have an internal cargo mission fail to reach altitude and it's considered newsworthy. They're the only private company going to space.
How is SpaceX "slipping"? Did you see the Startship booster landing? The Falcon 9 rocket has been improved repeatedly and it has been doing more and more. The minor issues never endangered crew or people on the ground. It is important to look at theses issues so you can improve and move forward but it does not reach the level of "slipping" in the slighest. If you don't like Elon I understand, but you cannot argue with the success of the Falcon 9 rocket or SpaceX. You seem vengful.
The booster landing anomaly might’ve been because this was the launch leader? This booster has been launched more than anything else and maybe 23 launches is the limit? In the fourth parachute issue is happened before . It only highlights the fact that SpaceX wanted to use three parachutes and NASA force them to use four. SpaceX was right and NASA was wrong. The ship only requires three parachutes and the fourth one can’t grab enough air to stay inflated.
Right. Find and fire a scapegoat to make it look like you're solving the problem [1:57] instead of tackling the real problem of rot in the ivory tower and the company culture that ensued.
The reason for the heat shield failure could be bird strike. Imagine all these poor birds flapping about, disorientated from being struck by windmills. Trump will fix it by banning wind turbines.
Lets get this straight, an astronaut criticized Musk? so the guy that merely flies on the thing, criticizing the guy that imagined, invented and built a whole new approach to everything when everyone including probably that astronaut told him it couldn't be done
well its ironic that 2 space shuttles failed (kaboom) yet he was willing to fly on them. but yeah still criticism is a good thing if its based on proper evidence and proof just saying random stuff without any base is dumb.
Looks like BO is learning how to name stuff properly (GERT), but they still need to learn how to delete Idiot Parts (like GERT) before moving into the naming phase.
I expected them to cancel the starliner project 6 months after they announced it, by 18 months I was surprised they hadn't already. I don't even remember how long ago that was, since then it's just been morbid curiosity. I don't particularly ever remember any good press regarding it's design. I just kind of assumed the black horse project would of made more headway than they ever did, so I guess hats off, congrats.
I think there was a bump into the bottom of the capsule during separation compressing some portions of the ablative Shield causing it to have greater thermal conductivity and thus burn through faster in those areas
@@bluesteel8376Flight 5 still had its glitches. Specifically the re-entry thermal issues on starships slats and misconfiguration of the booster that almost triggered an abort command during the catch. Sure flight 6 will probably look similar to flight 5 but there is still lots of room for improvement. Next up I bet we will see orbital refueling or a starship catch attempt
@@bluesteel8376 because its cool and i think isnt the 6th starship based on like a different prototype instead of the standard models. plus we can expect a landing of the starship on a proper landing pad hopefully.
*Boeing* is the sound made by an airframe maker and defense contractor who [expletive] up so totally that they're going to toss in the towel and take a _multi _*_billion_*_ dollar_ markdown on their annual stock report. *_Sucks to be them..._*
He literally quoted Jimmy Buffett's Margaritaville on their promotional video, so, I think we're starting to get a sense of exactly what it is we're dealing with here.
00:59 - Who the hell would want to buy an obsolete space station from Boeing that will soon be de -orbited (i.e., soon to be wreckage/burned crispy shrapnel as it comes down)?
Regarding Orion... "We know but won't tell you can mean one of two things: 1. We don't really know what caused it 2. We know what caused it but telling you would embarrass someone powerful.
When companies get away with charging high prices for subpar products, it can feel like consumers are being taken advantage of. But with people becoming more informed, more options available, and reviews playing a big role in purchase decisions, companies are now being held to higher standards. If they want to keep customers coming back, they have to deliver quality, not just a flashy label or a clever ad. The days of getting away with overcharging for mediocrity might finally be coming to an end.
Rocket Lab is the most awesome space company rising as an investmen you can actually invest in. Even Boeing Starliner is a Rocket Lab opportunity its Neutron, launch summer 2025, which is designed to be able to fly astronauts later, may indicate another cost-efficient high-quality fast-tempo company is needed for affordable fault tolerant multi vendor US human space access. RKLB 🚀
Boeing keeps the SLS because it's expensive, it's not reusable, and NASA hasn't given up on it yet. Wherever the government is still paying for it with no questions asked, Boeing will be there.
Thanks for giving me credit for my video, I really appreciate it, most people just take my material and say it theirs, love you channel, look forward to the next video
I would not be surprised if SpaceX build a landing pad on the moon for the SLS to have a safe arrival. However, the landing pad will have been built years before the SLS moon shot ever gets off the ground.. And as for SpaceX safety, they are constantly iterating - the Falcon 9 that took off even a year ago is not the same as the one taking off today. Yes, issues will arise but the aim is for them never to reoccur.
That new glenn layed down complexity shows why Elon made the rockets standing from starters... he is already landing them on chopsticks while they are trying to move the new glenn around on ground. They are building trucks to move airplanes...
trump and Elon musk support each other plus yeah sleepy joe Biden had beef with elon coz during a electric auto expo he didnt even mention america's best selling ev which was tesla and instead gave us some poopy stellantis and gm vehicles
id love to see a crewed dreamchaser but i dont see sierra having the resources to either get the starliner to work or change the dreamchaser back to being crewed anytime soon. a blue origin dreamliner could happen and it would save BO a lot of time and effort though.
The biggest issue with dreamchaser is the weird aerodynamics during launch compared to a simple pointy capsule - the launch vehicle company is gonna needs lots of $ to approve it for launch and I'm not sure there'll be launch insurance available as it's so different to everything else. As for the $, it's something you mention that sierra space may not have, I agree. I'm not sure if taking starliner with all it's baggage is best for BO rather than just identify the talented engineers and hire them.
@@aowen2471 a clean slate design is an option certainly. BO dont have to buy the starline and they have some experience of building capsules themselves but do BO also get the crewed flight contract with the starliner? if yes then i think it still makes sense.
Let’s face it. Lockheed could make a lander in year it’ll work and it’ll have technology unheard of even in movies. But they won’t because then god forbid they have to share some of their insane tech.
Commercial airliners operate in a much safer area of the envelope, yet planes still crash. How many airliners have went down over the last 70 years before reaching the current era of reliability? SpaceX operates at the extreme edge of the envelope, yet they have done so with a record of success that is hard to fathom. Reusability is a system and every system has limits. Engineering and testing can't always predict the limits of reliability. You can be sure every one of the issues mentioned here have resulted in numerous changes to process, manufacturing, and maintenance. The fact that none of them were mission ending suggests they are making every effort to maintain safety & reliability (while also testing the limits of reusability). Their very record of success has lulled many into thinking Space is routine and easy.
At long last an Engineer CEO who can accept reality ($ come second) and act accordingly ... I hope this is the start of Boeings return to world aero leader. 😊
They can no longer charge outrageous prices for a very bad product.
Oh no, there goes Boeing's business model.
@@catsupchutney Boeing adopted the McDonnell Douglas business model and immediately began to fail.
@@kents8451 Very true. Boeing used to be incredibly solid, it's really tragic how they got poisoned there.
@@rossc.ferraro6338 Hasn’t stopped Harley Davison.
Sure they can, it will just be classified cost plus payloads from here on out.
Back in the day everyone doubted SpaceX could ever compete with Boeing's space program 😂
now haters pay people to force it to fail or at least delay
@@darugdawg2453 Boeing is a self hating group.
I remember people being angry over SpaceX not getting the same amount of funding.
I mean no one can compete with Boeing... they keep setting new standards of ineptness!
Got paid less and did more. This is why competition is important. WI did this with the highway program. They offered like 5 or 6 digits in bonus every day they got done early. They finished like 13 days early (on a decade long project) iL is still working on their stretch of the same highway.
Boeing adopted the McDonnell Douglas business model and immediately began to fail. Boeing has become an embarrassment to American ingenuity and quality.
It has simply become a tool for kicking back ill gotten gains to politicos et al.
It's really only an embarrassment to itself. No need to drag the entire country into this.
@@markschroter2640 It's true though they've been funded and enabled by a country.
america's ingenuity nowadays looks like what the soviets were doing during the cold war with their airplanes.
Everything started to go wrong when everybody and his brother started adopting Jack Welch's approach to business-which was MD's playbook. There's a great critique of the damage Welch wrought in a book called: "The Man Who Broke Capitalism; How Jack Welch Gutted the Heartland and Crushed the Soul of Corporate America--And How to Undo His Legacy" by David Gelles.
Boeing Has Given Up On Starliner…❌
Everyone Has Given Up On Starliner…✔️
Can't give up on something you never really tired *pointing at head meme*
Taxpayers should get their money back for the star liner. Billions spent, nothing that can be used in return
Actually Boeing does not get paid
Just like scam x
@@TheGuruStud ?
@@forrestallison1879So youre tell me Boeing accept a contract by NASA for FREE?! Why do you think NASA selected Boeing in the first place if not due political influence? Boeing become a parasite corporation, thats a fact...
@@TheGuruStudyikes🥱🤣
At 5 billion per launch, the SLS is irrelevant in today’s reusable launch systems.
Scam X can't even get in actual space 😂😂😂
@@TheGuruStud They have been putting people in space for years now.
@@TheGuruStud falcon heavy was enough to put ULA out of business, starship is another level entirely.
@@markschroter2640currently Starship has a negative payload.
That might change with time but currently SLS Block 1 is the highest payload super heavy rocket.
@@zadarthule Highest in price per launch maybe
Good thing 33,000 Boeing employees have bargained for an accumulated 36% raise over the next 4 years plus a 12,000$ one time bonus… Guess the lay offs will start shortly.
If Boeing had focused on paying their employees higher wages and retaining talent and safety precautions rather than lining shareholder profits, maybe they wouldn’t be in their current predicament.
They really managed to do that? Oh my...
This is a management problem, not an employee problem.
@@Kahzm And Musk is no better, I heard what he thinks about over time payments and treatment of employees!
Look what he did to twitter ruined it
@@Kahzm I know someone working at Boing, I WISH I made as much as he does, in a very comparable management position…
No, the crew dragon 2nd stage had a small mis-timing on the deorbit burn, so it dropped slightly out of zone in the Pacific ...
Absolutely. The video claims SpaceX lost a payload. This simply didn't happen.
[Well, I was wrong about this. See below.]
@@mmandrewa2397 money and morals.
@@mmandrewa2397 There was another anomaly on Starlink Group 9-3 in July, in which all the payloads were lost when the second stage had an oxygen leak and failed to relight for the circularization burn. Which makes 3 anomalies in one summer...only one was a mission failure, and it was "only" a starlink mission, but it is mildly concerning to have three issues in a short span. It suggests possible systemic or culture issues. They can correct, but it is worth some attention.
@@darylbardo
Thank you. You're correct.
@@darylbardo these issues happening withing 1 month is an anomaly but not a strange one, you are bound to have more accidents when you launch more rockets than anyone else does.
Who in their right mind would want Boeing's space division.
Jeff Who. What a Bozo!
IP might be worth something. And engineers. We're short of these people everywhere
@@DunnickFayuroWhat kind of engineering
@@DunnickFayuro who would want a Boeing engineer ?
Depends on what strings come attached. The division itself is just fine.. the problem is that their contracts require them to 'partner' with many other companies and use the parts they are told to use. they have very little control over what actually goes into their capsule... remove those requirements and you would likely have a pretty effective division.
Boeing loves cost plus
That’s a shame Space X needs competition.
Agreed
neutron launch assuming it is 2 years from first engine test to booster integration, starship will be operational and may have completed the moon mission.
But this is an observational conjecture.
the only active players in the space game is china and space X with isro and jaxa making some great crafts in like a 1-2 year timespan not that consistent tho.
It's going to be very interesting if Elon ends up running the very department whose aviation agency regulates his own company.
Consider the admin (Elon😂) now is going to basically rubber stamp any spaceX launch, we can finally see Agile in hardware to the extreme.
4 years of rubber stamping with indefinite 4 years renew.
But overall, FAA will probably be so throughoutly gutted by Elon that everyone can now launch. The golden age of American space age is here.
One lagging chute inflation is not considered an anomaly.
If you look at it from the POV of the ultra-strict requirements of spaceflight (even more so in *human* spaceflight), forget the case of when the thing isn't able to do things as predicted, NASA cancelled the return of Butch and Suni because Starliner wasn't able to have the required probability of success despite it coming back down pretty well.
I think Neutron could get to orbit before New Glenn.
Every single spacecraft I have ever seen reentering with four parachutes 3 will open first followed by the fourth. It's possible to get all four to open exactly at the same time there's hundreds of little variables that make it unlikely.
Kinda like a 3 legged stool vs 4 legged. 4 Legged will almost always have a wobble until enough weight is applied.
Thank you for minimizing your use of vocal fry. The videos are much more satisfying to listen to 😊
Space travel is no easy task to accomplish anytime there will be plenty of disappointment and failures
Weird video. The parachute is not even a problem. It's normal behaviour. The landing failure isn't even bad news. They have been landing hundreds of times for years. They have a single failure and it's troubling and problematic?. When any other company on earth can land a booster, then we could talk about that. Then we have two upper stage problems. These are the real concern, but that is what the high safety record SpaceX upholds shows. They have an internal cargo mission fail to reach altitude and it's considered newsworthy. They're the only private company going to space.
Not quite the only private company. You are forgetting Rocket Lab. IIRC, they are now up to 53 successful lunches.
@@GntlTch Albeit not crewed
How is SpaceX "slipping"? Did you see the Startship booster landing? The Falcon 9 rocket has been improved repeatedly and it has been doing more and more. The minor issues never endangered crew or people on the ground. It is important to look at theses issues so you can improve and move forward but it does not reach the level of "slipping" in the slighest. If you don't like Elon I understand, but you cannot argue with the success of the Falcon 9 rocket or SpaceX. You seem vengful.
The criticism, just like the FAA issue, is political.
The last part of your video:
FAA licences should not be about relationships, but on hard facts.
The booster landing anomaly might’ve been because this was the launch leader? This booster has been launched more than anything else and maybe 23 launches is the limit?
In the fourth parachute issue is happened before . It only highlights the fact that SpaceX wanted to use three parachutes and NASA force them to use four. SpaceX was right and NASA was wrong. The ship only requires three parachutes and the fourth one can’t grab enough air to stay inflated.
3 chutes were having issues during testing elon had the idea for the 4th chute. NASA had nothing to do with it.
Right. Find and fire a scapegoat to make it look like you're solving the problem [1:57] instead of tackling the real problem of rot in the ivory tower and the company culture that ensued.
Space x is not slipping
Elon’s about to make it a lot better for all the rocket companies thanks to DOGE hahah. This will be awesome. Let em all fly!
They have a good relationship with the FAA? That is why everyone is playing catch up with SpaceX
I offer 75 cents per pound for the capsule, but the tooling, materials and spares need to be included for free.
Also free shipping to my location.
The reason for the heat shield failure could be bird strike. Imagine all these poor birds flapping about, disorientated from being struck by windmills. Trump will fix it by banning wind turbines.
God I hope this is satire
@Wurtoz9643 yes, it was.
@@Wurtoz9643 I wanna be a whale psychiatrist
@@michaelreid2329 good
Just glad we talking about this stuff!!❤❤❤
Elon Elon Elon Elon Elon
Good, put the money into fixing the planes
Lets get this straight, an astronaut criticized Musk? so the guy that merely flies on the thing, criticizing the guy that imagined, invented and built a whole new approach to everything when everyone including probably that astronaut told him it couldn't be done
well its ironic that 2 space shuttles failed (kaboom) yet he was willing to fly on them. but yeah still criticism is a good thing if its based on proper evidence and proof just saying random stuff without any base is dumb.
So Musk us so rich he's officially above criticism? Keep simping for billionaires, good peasant
Nice to find a space news channel that simply reports the facts.
Now its time to chase dreams.
It's impressive how fantastic your content is!
Looks like BO is learning how to name stuff properly (GERT), but they still need to learn how to delete Idiot Parts (like GERT) before moving into the naming phase.
I expected them to cancel the starliner project 6 months after they announced it, by 18 months I was surprised they hadn't already. I don't even remember how long ago that was, since then it's just been morbid curiosity. I don't particularly ever remember any good press regarding it's design. I just kind of assumed the black horse project would of made more headway than they ever did, so I guess hats off, congrats.
Thanks for using metric. Saves me the work of dividing "feet" by 3.3.
I think there was a bump into the bottom of the capsule during separation compressing some portions of the ablative Shield causing it to have greater thermal conductivity and thus burn through faster in those areas
Cant wait for lanch 6 starship
How come? It sounds like they are not trying to do anything new. Just a repeat of flight 5.
@@bluesteel8376 because this is cool
@@bluesteel8376Flight 5 still had its glitches. Specifically the re-entry thermal issues on starships slats and misconfiguration of the booster that almost triggered an abort command during the catch. Sure flight 6 will probably look similar to flight 5 but there is still lots of room for improvement. Next up I bet we will see orbital refueling or a starship catch attempt
They caught an empty cylinder last time- At this rate we will be drinking recycled urine in a lava tube on Mars soon-
@@bluesteel8376 because its cool and i think isnt the 6th starship based on like a different prototype instead of the standard models. plus we can expect a landing of the starship on a proper landing pad hopefully.
Also Boeing stopped being run by engineers and by accountants
Grandpa had a saying, “no matter how hard you try, you can’t polish a turd”. Sums up Starliner succinctly.
*Boeing* is the sound made by an airframe maker and defense contractor who [expletive] up so totally that they're going to toss in the towel and take a _multi _*_billion_*_ dollar_ markdown on their annual stock report. *_Sucks to be them..._*
That's their CEO? Is he going for the Bankman-Freid look or does he just not care?
He literally quoted Jimmy Buffett's Margaritaville on their promotional video, so, I think we're starting to get a sense of exactly what it is we're dealing with here.
00:59 - Who the hell would want to buy an obsolete space station from Boeing that will soon be de -orbited (i.e., soon to be wreckage/burned crispy shrapnel as it comes down)?
boeing doesn't own the space station. its selling the starliner capsule program.
Boeing should pay back all the money that NASA paid to them.
Regarding Orion...
"We know but won't tell you can mean one of two things:
1. We don't really know what caused it
2. We know what caused it but telling you would embarrass someone powerful.
When companies get away with charging high prices for subpar products, it can feel like consumers are being taken advantage of. But with people becoming more informed, more options available, and reviews playing a big role in purchase decisions, companies are now being held to higher standards. If they want to keep customers coming back, they have to deliver quality, not just a flashy label or a clever ad. The days of getting away with overcharging for mediocrity might finally be coming to an end.
For the first time, there’s real competition in this market. And look what happened …
My source at Ali Express told me that the root cause of the issue with NASA's heat shield was switching to Temu.
I like the countinous sentence of the video. Good job
Just because you flew on the spaceshuttle, doesn't make you a space expert. Just because I have been on a plane, I'm not an aviation expert!
You don't need to train your entire career to be a passenger on a plane.
In retrospect it probably wasn't a good idea to have a white elephant as StarLiners unofficial mascot.
I think BO is going to succeed but they can't compete with Soace X
It's about time, everyone else has.!!
G.E.R.T. - Giant Enormous Rocket Truck.... Did they really need Giant and Enormous in the name? LOL
Yes. It’s funny. Also it allows for Gert. Which is also funny.
it’s a giant (enormous rocket) truck. meaning it’s a giant truck that carries enormous rockets. makes sense to me
Rocket Lab is the most awesome space company rising as an investmen you can actually invest in. Even Boeing Starliner is a Rocket Lab opportunity its Neutron, launch summer 2025, which is designed to be able to fly astronauts later, may indicate another cost-efficient high-quality fast-tempo company is needed for affordable fault tolerant multi vendor US human space access.
RKLB 🚀
Boeing keeps the SLS because it's expensive, it's not reusable, and NASA hasn't given up on it yet. Wherever the government is still paying for it with no questions asked, Boeing will be there.
Aaand without an iss replcement , nowhere for starliner to go.
Really NASA is concerned about SpaceX? Yeah ha ha sure
Well .. 400 flights with 330+ landings... Eventually Falcon 9 would have an EOL
Thanks for giving me credit for my video, I really appreciate it, most people just take my material and say it theirs, love you channel, look forward to the next video
I would not be surprised if SpaceX build a landing pad on the moon for the SLS to have a safe arrival. However, the landing pad will have been built years before the SLS moon shot ever gets off the ground.. And as for SpaceX safety, they are constantly iterating - the Falcon 9 that took off even a year ago is not the same as the one taking off today. Yes, issues will arise but the aim is for them never to reoccur.
The real question is will SLS even be continued at this point. It will be on live support until Starship is manrated, then it is off to the races.
That new glenn layed down complexity shows why Elon made the rockets standing from starters... he is already landing them on chopsticks while they are trying to move the new glenn around on ground. They are building trucks to move airplanes...
Dreamchaser HASN'T EVEN BEEN TO ORBIT YET!!!!
Please bring back the older narrator :(
12:20 They have a really fantastic relationship with the FAA bureaucracy until January, when President Trump cleans house.
trump and Elon musk support each other plus yeah sleepy joe Biden had beef with elon coz during a electric auto expo he didnt even mention america's best selling ev which was tesla and instead gave us some poopy stellantis and gm vehicles
id love to see a crewed dreamchaser but i dont see sierra having the resources to either get the starliner to work or change the dreamchaser back to being crewed anytime soon. a blue origin dreamliner could happen and it would save BO a lot of time and effort though.
The biggest issue with dreamchaser is the weird aerodynamics during launch compared to a simple pointy capsule - the launch vehicle company is gonna needs lots of $ to approve it for launch and I'm not sure there'll be launch insurance available as it's so different to everything else. As for the $, it's something you mention that sierra space may not have, I agree.
I'm not sure if taking starliner with all it's baggage is best for BO rather than just identify the talented engineers and hire them.
@@aowen2471 a clean slate design is an option certainly. BO dont have to buy the starline and they have some experience of building capsules themselves but do BO also get the crewed flight contract with the starliner? if yes then i think it still makes sense.
It should be 'Startruck'
Starbanger
No, Startrash!
thats something that elon would name if he were to make one.
I said it and I’ll said it again NASA should never have chosen Boeing they should of chosen Sierra Nirvada
Don't you mean they finally realized they will no longer be allowed to waste money
Workers at Boeing getting paid handsomely as an engineer salary
$20 bucks says blue origin gonna blow up during or shortly after liftoff.
And never comes back.
bezos owns blue origin with very little outside investment. if the rocket fails he will try again. he can afford it.
Who turned up the savagery on this video. 😂😂😅
The level of glee about this among space TH-camrs is high.
Call me Nostradamus, I believe I said this just after the failed return.
Let’s face it. Lockheed could make a lander in year it’ll work and it’ll have technology unheard of even in movies. But they won’t because then god forbid they have to share some of their insane tech.
Commercial airliners operate in a much safer area of the envelope, yet planes still crash. How many airliners have went down over the last 70 years before reaching the current era of reliability? SpaceX operates at the extreme edge of the envelope, yet they have done so with a record of success that is hard to fathom. Reusability is a system and every system has limits. Engineering and testing can't always predict the limits of reliability. You can be sure every one of the issues mentioned here have resulted in numerous changes to process, manufacturing, and maintenance. The fact that none of them were mission ending suggests they are making every effort to maintain safety & reliability (while also testing the limits of reusability). Their very record of success has lulled many into thinking Space is routine and easy.
It's going to the great big money pit in the sky, and no, I don't mean the iSS.
Lol. Harsh, but true. To the ISS, I mean, not Starliner.
Blue Origin is Great Value SpaceX
At long last an Engineer CEO who can accept reality ($ come second) and act accordingly ... I hope this is the start of Boeings return to world aero leader. 😊
So, are US space ships (as stated in the captions) crude? 😜
I'd buy it cheap for a chicken coup if they will deliver.
Boeing should just stick to making airplanes. Oh wait…
Good idea they can't recover from that embarrassment
.... SpaceX is slipping?! Compared to who?!?
I think BO taking over Starliner is a good idea.
I’d just throw the whole thing out lol
They just need to get a rocket that can reach orbit now...
By what reasoning? Two bads make a good???
Correction: Retro spam cans!
" . . . yet still managed to have a bigger problem than SpaceX ever experienced."
Ah, yes, the convenient memories of fanboys.
Did they fire all competent people in favour of DEI candidates?
Peter Beck (and call girl) has a better relationship with the FAA. WTF kind of marketing is that?
Aaaand robot voice is back
they fail because they didn't earn it.
So is Boeing going to give back all of the billions they wasted?
It’s for the best.
Haaaahahaha. BOEING. Merican quality and engineering.. Reminds me of GM in the 80s.
Well SpaceX is Merican 🤦🏼
Boeing needs a complete cultural change. Their aircraft are barely competitive.
New Glen is "so big" 7m diameter ?
If Boeing sells, do we get our tax money back?
The ratio of views to comments on this video is highly sus.
SpaceX is slipping??? There is nothing new here. These incidents were all a normal part of prototype testing.
Who is giving you kickback?