Absolutely fantastic series here!!! Been learning alot about salvation we have found a great church by us here in Ormond Beach Florida called Riverbend and they preach line by line salvation just like this... I have run into a couple people giving me push back about the free will to choose god issue. My thought on it is if we are wrong in saying it's not our free will or choice to choose god, is god really going to be upset that we are trying to give all the glory to him? I think not. I know see it as a very conceited point of view if we think we did anything to help move our salvation along. Funny I used to think I did do something, I now see I was wrong, we do nothing without him and he deserves all the glory always and forever!! Thank you for this really thoughtful series of videos that dig deep into the heart of the scriptures just like we should be doing...
So thankful to have left Calvinism/Reformed theology (PCA denomination) for Eastern Orthodoxy. Used to be a fan of Piper. Calvinism massively violates history/continuity of the ancient Church by violating the Nicene-Constaninopolitan Creed in three obvious ways: 1) Accepting the illicit "filioque" addition from Rome/misinterpreting the Trinity in the later Latin fashion vs. the Cappadocian original intent, 2) Denying baptismal regeneration ("I believe in baptism for the forgiveness of sins"), and 3) Reinterpreting/abusing - as an "invisible" church - the article "And in One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church". Calvinism claims to believe in the Creed; but, clearly departs from the " phronema" of the 318 Bishops at Nicea - including St Athanasius. They also produced canons, which make zero sense in Calvinism (i.e. Viaticum (Eucharist at death), Apostolic sees, etc, etc, etc) further showing that there is no continuity. Calvinism changes the semiotics and phronema, which, let's be honest, radically alters the Creed's meaning. There are dozens of serious flaws in Reformed epistemology/first principles; and, in its obviously flawed Biblical distortions (i.e. Limited Atonement). So much for Sola Scriptura: an idea that has zero historical support, nor could it have been implemented prior to mass literacy and the printing press; and, in fact, proves too much - since the NT writers/Church Fathers all used the Greek Septuagint for the OT and NOT the smaller Protestant/Palestinian Jewish canon of the OT. Based on the latter, anachronistically applying SS to the ancient Church would still disprove Calvinism/Protestantism.
Bonjour, excellent message comme très souvent, surtout concernant la sotériologie et ses complexités. Je souhaite cependant signaler un incident choquant, je ne sais pas si cela peut être corrigé. Le dernier mot prononcé par John Piper, "alone", est reproduit dans le sous-titrage de la pire des manières, c'est démoniaque (l'intelligence artificielle est toujours plus problématique), on obtient, au lieu de "alone", "Allah". Pouvez-vous chasser ce mensonge ? Merci, gloire à Dieu en Christ Jésus, Yéchoua !
@@1984SheepDog Big lie. And those breakings were necessary consequences. It's a better thing than keeping all the billion christians under one supreme human authority. If the pope teaches something wrong, all the Church would live under a lie. You have a vision of denominations as ennemies, but it shouldn't be like that. There should be, in disagreement, the will of accomplishing one thing : preeching of the good news to the whole world as Jesus commended, and we all agree on what the Gospel is. If a denomination's Gospel is not about Jesus and salvation, then it's not part of the Church.
Luther's expression of scripture alone shows that his conscience is the final authority, not scripture. Total lack of humility toward the church that Jesus established. The protestant reformation can summed up in the sentiment of a rebellious teenager: "I hate you Mom and Dad! You're so stupid, I know better than you, and I don't need you anymore!"
@@choicemeatrandy6572 one of the biggest holes in protestant theology is that without a visible/authoritative head of the church, there is no way to objectively distinguish between human opinion and divine revelation.
Faith without works is dead. Believe on the Lord Jesus be saved gods wrath against the person and his sinful nature is subsided by righteousness of faith.
True faith will always accompagny works. Faith is always and can only be shown by works. But faith itself is a thing and an action already. When you receive God's grace, your heart is transformed and the Holy Spirit will work within you. A christian who don't work is a christian who don't listen to God. But God never leaves and He will never stop acting for the one He has chosen to be saved. A true christian will always work with love and obediance to God.
Absolutely fantastic series here!!! Been learning alot about salvation we have found a great church by us here in Ormond Beach Florida called Riverbend and they preach line by line salvation just like this... I have run into a couple people giving me push back about the free will to choose god issue. My thought on it is if we are wrong in saying it's not our free will or choice to choose god, is god really going to be upset that we are trying to give all the glory to him? I think not. I know see it as a very conceited point of view if we think we did anything to help move our salvation along. Funny I used to think I did do something, I now see I was wrong, we do nothing without him and he deserves all the glory always and forever!! Thank you for this really thoughtful series of videos that dig deep into the heart of the scriptures just like we should be doing...
Great series of lectures :-)
Thank You Pastor John!!!💕
So thankful to have left Calvinism/Reformed theology (PCA denomination) for Eastern Orthodoxy. Used to be a fan of Piper. Calvinism massively violates history/continuity of the ancient Church by violating the Nicene-Constaninopolitan Creed in three obvious ways: 1) Accepting the illicit "filioque" addition from Rome/misinterpreting the Trinity in the later Latin fashion vs. the Cappadocian original intent, 2) Denying baptismal regeneration ("I believe in baptism for the forgiveness of sins"), and 3) Reinterpreting/abusing - as an "invisible" church - the article "And in One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church". Calvinism claims to believe in the Creed; but, clearly departs from the " phronema" of the 318 Bishops at Nicea - including St Athanasius. They also produced canons, which make zero sense in Calvinism (i.e. Viaticum (Eucharist at death), Apostolic sees, etc, etc, etc) further showing that there is no continuity. Calvinism changes the semiotics and phronema, which, let's be honest, radically alters the Creed's meaning.
There are dozens of serious flaws in Reformed epistemology/first principles; and, in its obviously flawed Biblical distortions (i.e. Limited Atonement). So much for Sola Scriptura: an idea that has zero historical support, nor could it have been implemented prior to mass literacy and the printing press; and, in fact, proves too much - since the NT writers/Church Fathers all used the Greek Septuagint for the OT and NOT the smaller Protestant/Palestinian Jewish canon of the OT. Based on the latter, anachronistically applying SS to the ancient Church would still disprove Calvinism/Protestantism.
cool!
Scripture he pointed was pretty clear...
Bonjour, excellent message comme très souvent, surtout concernant la sotériologie et ses complexités. Je souhaite cependant signaler un incident choquant, je ne sais pas si cela peut être corrigé. Le dernier mot prononcé par John Piper, "alone", est reproduit dans le sous-titrage de la pire des manières, c'est démoniaque (l'intelligence artificielle est toujours plus problématique), on obtient, au lieu de "alone", "Allah". Pouvez-vous chasser ce mensonge ?
Merci, gloire à Dieu en Christ Jésus, Yéchoua !
Who's interpretation of Scripture is correct then?
Scripture interprets scripture.
@@kentpaulguadalquiver1177 until passages conflict then you break into 30,000 denominations
@@1984SheepDog Big lie. And those breakings were necessary consequences. It's a better thing than keeping all the billion christians under one supreme human authority. If the pope teaches something wrong, all the Church would live under a lie.
You have a vision of denominations as ennemies, but it shouldn't be like that. There should be, in disagreement, the will of accomplishing one thing : preeching of the good news to the whole world as Jesus commended, and we all agree on what the Gospel is.
If a denomination's Gospel is not about Jesus and salvation, then it's not part of the Church.
Powerful
🙌🏿🙌🏿🙌🏿🙌🏿
You wrote “unless I am convicted by scripture” instead of “unless I am convinced by scripture”.
Sola scriptura tells you that you should follow the church (which cancels sola scriptura, RIP protestants); Matthew 18:15-20
Referring to a local church with elders. Protestants follow this in church today, and we call it church discipline.
But Scriptures never told us that the Church always gives infaillible teachings.
You don't understand sola scriptura.
Luther's expression of scripture alone shows that his conscience is the final authority, not scripture. Total lack of humility toward the church that Jesus established.
The protestant reformation can summed up in the sentiment of a rebellious teenager: "I hate you Mom and Dad! You're so stupid, I know better than you, and I don't need you anymore!"
You didn't respond to anything stated in the video unfortunately
@@choicemeatrandy6572 Yes.
@@1984SheepDog Just as long as it's clear to anyone reading this later that Rome cannot respond to anything consistently, cordially or coherently.
@@choicemeatrandy6572 thats not true, Trent Horn is way smarter and kinder than I am.
@@choicemeatrandy6572 one of the biggest holes in protestant theology is that without a visible/authoritative head of the church, there is no way to objectively distinguish between human opinion and divine revelation.
Faith without works is dead. Believe on the Lord Jesus be saved gods wrath against the person and his sinful nature is subsided by righteousness of faith.
What biblical evidence do you have for your idea?
True faith will always accompagny works. Faith is always and can only be shown by works. But faith itself is a thing and an action already.
When you receive God's grace, your heart is transformed and the Holy Spirit will work within you. A christian who don't work is a christian who don't listen to God. But God never leaves and He will never stop acting for the one He has chosen to be saved. A true christian will always work with love and obediance to God.