How did Roman Aqueducts work?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 175

  • @neimanmario
    @neimanmario ปีที่แล้ว +92

    And it was not mentioned that many aqueducts, perhaps most, did not use any mortar between the rocks that form its structure. I can attest this fact at least for the one in Segovia, which I visited several times. The individual pieces were cut with such precision that they fit perfectly and sustained themselves without any mortar in between. And they still stand 2000 years later. Amazing!!

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Yes, so true- same goes for Aqua Claudia in Rome!

    • @elainebmack
      @elainebmack ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Extraordinary!

    • @Roger-nk5ug
      @Roger-nk5ug หลายเดือนก่อน

      We must be living in in the Matrix! This can't be real. How is any of this possible? Seriously?

    • @neimanmario
      @neimanmario หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because Roman engineers were geniuses far advanced for their times and they taught and trained their stone cutters in the "state of the art" craft, unsurpassed to this day. BTW the same is true for many aspects of Roman culture.

  • @hugodesrosiers-plaisance3156
    @hugodesrosiers-plaisance3156 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    As a land surveyor and a history geek, I am in absolute awe of what the ancient peoples accomplished with their tools. Human ingenuity knows no bounds. I would love to learn to use ancient Roman surveying equipment.

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There are some interesting experimental archaeology videos out there showing some of the equipment in use.

    • @JeremiahAlphonsus
      @JeremiahAlphonsus ปีที่แล้ว

      They were superior, far superior, to modern man. Reject the myth of progress.

    • @hugodesrosiers-plaisance3156
      @hugodesrosiers-plaisance3156 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JeremiahAlphonsus I find idealizing them is counter-productive when trying to understand them.

    • @AB-wf8ek
      @AB-wf8ek 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@JeremiahAlphonsus Are you kidding me? Did you not see the lead pipes?
      The bias is we are only seeing what's survived. You have no concept of the average Roman citizen (not to mention slaves) in comparison to modern people.
      The average Roman could have been much more biased and detached from reality than any modern individual, you'd never know.

  • @mikeifyouplease
    @mikeifyouplease ปีที่แล้ว +13

    How crazy wonderful that some of the Ancient Roman aqueducts are still in use TODAY!! And not only is that amazing, but historians and engineers don't have to guess and speculate on how the aqueducts worked and functioned because they can just walk over to the Ancient Roman aqueducts are are in operation...RIGHT NOW in the modern city of Rome!!

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Rome is a truly rich resource for the study of aqueducts. Bits and pieces of various lines are still being uncovered in a number of excavations. Truly astounding.

  • @grahamhodge8313
    @grahamhodge8313 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Excellent video. I have visited the aqueducts in aqueduct park near the Appian Way and also canoed down the river beneath the Pont Du Gard and visited the museum there. The Romans were so far ahead of their time that it was many centuries before equivalent levels of technology were reinvented. Astounding stuff.

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Two amazing adventures with aqueducts. We have a lot more to share - even in Rome- regarding the individual routes, so stay tuned!

  • @andyroo9381
    @andyroo9381 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I visited Madrid, Spain for one week. I made a daytrip to Segovia, just to see the aqueduct. It was so big, beautiful and amazing!

    • @antonboludo8886
      @antonboludo8886 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Same here.

    • @bluefairy9683
      @bluefairy9683 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Me too , after this trip 2 days ago i just came here to learn how the Romans can do this ! Completely astonishing

  • @moniquelee3623
    @moniquelee3623 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    ''I often think that the Romans were fortunate; their civilization reached as far as hot baths without touching the fatal knowledge of machinery.'' James Hilton

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They made some incredible advances. We like to share insights on the civilization, for better and worse! Free lectures monthly (live) if you sign up for our newsletter at ancientromelive.org.

  • @Xhosalion
    @Xhosalion ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Additionally there were holding tanks along the route of the aqueduct with sluice gates. An official lived nearby. His task was analogous to the railway gatekeeper at a crossing. His task was to change the size of the sluice gate in order to either reduce, or augment the flow of water so that it was at the optimum level within the water course. The ovoid shape of the water course was designed to prevent back currents and was dependent on the flow not being too strong, which could cause wall damage, or to weak, which would not allow an even distribution of sediment and thus cause build up and eventual blockages. He was also responsible for keeping the channels clear. When the Germanic tribes took over the Roman area, they neglected to pay for this official, causing a degradation of the whole aqueduct system both in reliability of water flow and structural integrity. (Source: the museum at Pont du Gard, Provence)

  • @ecamp6360
    @ecamp6360 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    As someone who worked at NYC's DEP (Water/Sewer Dept.) this was fascinating. Learned alot. A "duh!" point for me was when he said that the bridges that we consider "aqueducts" were ..."a [small] fraction..." of the whole system. As in NYC, most is underground. The High Bridge was our Roman "aqueduct.

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว

      Awesome! Thank you for sharing your experience. It's fantastic to make those connections with the past!

  • @RTD3
    @RTD3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thanks for making this video 1 month after returning from a 2 week exploration/vacation of Rome 😁. Roman aquaducts define the brilliance of Roman engineering, imho.

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We agree! Expect a couple more videos on specific aspects of aqueducts in Rome!

  • @silverchairsg
    @silverchairsg ปีที่แล้ว +3

    4:22 It's really cool to see the groma immortalized in the inscription.

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว

      That was a special treat to see it- there are actually quite a few! But panning up / zooming in (and pairing it with the reconstruction version) was a fun way to underline its importance.

  • @gzee6820
    @gzee6820 ปีที่แล้ว

    Playing AC Valhalla and every time I pass the aqueducts in North England, I wondered how they worked! This video explains it perfectly and really good for getting a sense of the immense scope of the project to bring water into the empire.

  • @Bill-l7g
    @Bill-l7g 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Probably the amount of lead exposure was reduced over time as the pipes were internally coated with calcium deposits

  • @kayfish7621
    @kayfish7621 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Excellent lecture. It makes me curious how much the populace was affected by the lead pipes carrying water.

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +21

      thank you. Yes, we can devote more videos so such aspects of aqueducts (check our water in Rome playlist for 2 more videos on aqueducts). The lead quickly became lined with calcium (as it was spring water)- thereby keeping the water from directly touching the lead. The water never "sat" in the pipes. It was always flowing. Today, we can look at the US and note that lead pipes are still frequently in use (but the water "sits" in those pipes!): "NRDC estimates that there is a range of 9.7 million to 12.8 million pipes that are, or may be, lead, spread across all 50 states". www.nrdc.org/resources/lead-pipes-are-widespread-and-used-every-state. It's not just a Roman issue- but one that is still a concern today!

    • @Dave-ro3nj
      @Dave-ro3nj ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@AncientRomeLive Smarter then than now.

  • @markusdylewski7592
    @markusdylewski7592 ปีที่แล้ว

    Uwazam pana kanal za najlepswzy w tematyce antycznego Rzymu.Pozdrawiam.

  • @LeePenn2492
    @LeePenn2492 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Interesting and informative..years ahead of their time .

  • @WalkingToursVlog
    @WalkingToursVlog ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Amazing & beautiful video! 👍😍 Respect to the author! 🏆 Thanks for sharing! 🤝

  • @lisacarbone7792
    @lisacarbone7792 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks so much for the fantastic and informative content 😊

  • @edithcallaway4316
    @edithcallaway4316 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    A 'Plumber' the Roman name for a worker of Lead, the chemical symbol of lead is Pb, hence The name of the Tradesman 'Plumber'

  • @KadenSpencer-i3n
    @KadenSpencer-i3n ปีที่แล้ว

    this video was insane it helped a lot for my socsil studies project every other video was trash i wanted to through my chromebook in the garbage because they sucked so much but this video actually helped merci beaucoup-mr -spencer

  • @crypticTV
    @crypticTV 2 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

    3km/hr
    4:00 1m per 3300m drop
    10:20 slaves to clean channel
    13:45 Park of aqueducts

  • @mikeifyouplease
    @mikeifyouplease ปีที่แล้ว +8

    If you ever get a chance to come to California, I would recommend a visit to the Spanish Mission in the city of Lompoc. While no where as magnificent as the aqueducts of Ancient Rome, it does have its own mostly intact aqueduct system, from the water source of a small lake through a water-filter building to finally the public fountain that provided water for the residents of the mission. The aqueduct itself is a mere stone-encased ditch, you can leisurely walk from start to finish in a mere hour. It is also interesting that there are postings on the mission grounds, that stated that the designers of the system used the information gained from literature of the Ancient Rome engineers on how to design and construct such a water system. And finally, on an intriguing twist of history, it was the Native American Indians, who bathed daily in local streams, while the "civilized" Spaniards did not bathe for months on end and stank to high heaven.

  • @johnrobinson4445
    @johnrobinson4445 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Really great topic. 8.

  • @flamencoprof
    @flamencoprof ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Excellent stuff. I am disappointed in myself for not thinking of trying to see the workings you showed of that aqueduct in Segovia when I was there.

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Such a great aqueduct line!

    • @bluefairy9683
      @bluefairy9683 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Pls you should go , I am completely shocked by it !

    • @flamencoprof
      @flamencoprof 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bluefairy9683 I am now too old and can't/shouldn't afford to go back.

  • @T2Billion
    @T2Billion 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I really enjoyed this video! Hats off! 👍🏽

  • @paulschofield2630
    @paulschofield2630 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Eventually Rome was conquered by attacking the water supply!! 💧 WTF no water no more fighting 😢 😮 cheers 🍻 from Australia ❤❤ great video 😊

  • @denizalgazi
    @denizalgazi ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Fascinating subject! 👍

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      thank you- please note we have 2 other Aqueduct videos. And subscribe to ancientromelive.org newsletter for links to free seminars.

  • @jarrodreaves243
    @jarrodreaves243 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love the vid bro keep em coming

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      thanks, man. We are on a roll- just need to get the word out. Thanks for sharing!

  • @12345682900
    @12345682900 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Excellent video, thanks.

  • @ildianci
    @ildianci ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing! Thank you very much, very informative video!

  • @MB-nn3jw
    @MB-nn3jw ปีที่แล้ว +40

    The Romans were excellent engineers, but in particular, their hydro engineering was unsurpassed in my limited opinion.

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hard to beat! Sure there are qanats and aqueducts of the Greeks- but the ubiquity of the aqueducts throughout the Roman Empire is truly amazing.

    • @HansDunkelberg1
      @HansDunkelberg1 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes, their hydro engineering will have been outstanding for their time - but only for their time. They were not aware of the necessity to allow some stretching and contracting of the conduits due to the shrinking and lengthening caused by temperature changes, or at least had no means of counteracting this problem. The result was, according to L. Sprague de Camp, a constant leaking of the aqueducts, with sinter terraces forming where the water got out.

    • @EllieMaes-Grandad
      @EllieMaes-Grandad ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HansDunkelberg1 Not to mention the theft of water at various points along the channels . . .

    • @HansDunkelberg1
      @HansDunkelberg1 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EllieMaes-Grandad Yes, L. Sprague de Camp mentions the thefts too, but such a problem won't reduce the level of the technological achievement. Perhaps it can prove that Roman technologies of _law enforcement_ have been developed less astoundingly. Apart from this, I guess I remember that also such thieves have already used copper pipes and cranes.

    • @EllieMaes-Grandad
      @EllieMaes-Grandad ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@HansDunkelberg1 The level of technological achievement is impressively high - nobody else in antiquity was even remotely as competent.
      PS you didn't mention syphons for crossing valleys . . .

  • @ingemarolson3240
    @ingemarolson3240 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Did I interpret the calcium deposits inside the specus correctly? It looked like they narrowed the channel down to less than half its original width. Was that typical?

    • @mikeifyouplease
      @mikeifyouplease ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Great question!

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The calcium deposits varied per individual channel- aqueduct source. Frontinus writes about cleaning the channels. We know this was done, but not the frequency. Accretions- of various levels- are visible in Rome. The Pont du Gard example is really extreme. Famously, its slope is very slight, which would have had a negative effect.

    • @EllieMaes-Grandad
      @EllieMaes-Grandad ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AncientRomeLive I walked in that [dry] PdeG channel over thirty years ago; not a lot of calcium was visible, but then I wasn't looking for it . . .

  • @johnmcnulty4425
    @johnmcnulty4425 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I wonder what the impact on the water table and the surrounding countryside was from diverting away so much water?

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว

      Great question. Luckily, Italy is rich in springs (main source for the aqueducts).

    • @lesliejamespayne3942
      @lesliejamespayne3942 ปีที่แล้ว

      They probably originated from a Reservoir or Lake, below the Snow line/levels?

  • @marthaarya167
    @marthaarya167 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    great explanations

  • @DennisCambly
    @DennisCambly 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is/was a video on TH-cam that shows how the aqueducts were built. Rather amazing considering some of them were 30-40 kilometers from Rome. It was all gravity driven.

  • @Kayla-ep5gm
    @Kayla-ep5gm ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great video! Still think it’s amazing that trams in Rome pass right under the aqueducts at Porta Maggiore in Rome! What would happen if one of them had a blockage or sprung a leak?

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Such an amazing transport zone! The area deserves more respect! If any problems, a given line was stopped at the source for maintenance- workers then entered the empty channel to repair the problem.

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Such an amazing transport zone! The area deserves more respect! If any problems, a given line was stopped at the source for maintenance- workers then entered the empty channel to repair the problem.

  • @bruceburns1672
    @bruceburns1672 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Modern Britain today should take note of the Roman Empire, Britain sees itself today as part of the modern world, but sadly their industrial base has collapsed which used to finance the modern economy hence like America as well they now are at the borrowing stage to continue giving themselves the modern economy which they feel they are entitled too, they should all look to what happened to ancient Rome and think twice and get back to work and produce the wealth necessary to finance a modern state or become like Rome .

  • @heinrichmuller7974
    @heinrichmuller7974 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i've always wondered what the effect of drinking water through lead pipes had on the Roman populace?

  • @SW-11
    @SW-11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting that 1:200 is used today for gravity sewers (at least where I live). Great video. Thanks!

    • @SW-11
      @SW-11 ปีที่แล้ว

      As are settlement chambers to remove debris. Amazing.

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you!

  • @leonardothefabulous3490
    @leonardothefabulous3490 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice job. One question; how did they measure elevation-to know what sources were higher than Rome-many tiles away?

  • @who9387
    @who9387 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How did they work ? Water always runs downhill, SIMPLES
    What was ther function ? They bdelivered water from A to B

  • @southpaw8168
    @southpaw8168 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    well made video!

  • @benjeanettebooth1800
    @benjeanettebooth1800 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There is a very well preserved aqueduct in Nimes, a Roman city in southern France.

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, we looked at its castellum aquae at 7:50.

  • @LevelUpTrivia1
    @LevelUpTrivia1 ปีที่แล้ว

    So did the water run over the top or underground

  • @Allannah_Of_Rome
    @Allannah_Of_Rome ปีที่แล้ว

    The Romans also used lead because it was a soft metal and easier to fashion into pipes at the time!

  • @KadenSpencer-i3n
    @KadenSpencer-i3n ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i subed

  • @mikeifyouplease
    @mikeifyouplease ปีที่แล้ว

    Your voice sounds A LITTLE like Manuel Bravo, who also creates great videos about Ancient Rome. Perhaps you two should collaborate on future projects, if you haven't already.

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ah ha! Just you wait! We admire his work!

  • @BoomVang
    @BoomVang ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Vitruvius also wrote an essay deducing that lead pipes were unhealthy

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes there are so many more aspects of aqueducts we will cover- more on Vitruvius and Frontinus.

  • @genghisthegreat2034
    @genghisthegreat2034 ปีที่แล้ว

    It works by Manning's Law....an Irish engineer.
    But the Romans knew instinctively, the right trade off between gradient, wetted perimeter, roughness factor....and laminar openchannel flow

  • @tony8074
    @tony8074 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Roman aqueduct system was not matched until the Victorian Era.

  • @joedoe-sedoe7977
    @joedoe-sedoe7977 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Traveling such great distance at relatively low volume and velocity, one wonders why it didnt evaporate on a hot day before it reached Rome

  • @j.macmillan2293
    @j.macmillan2293 ปีที่แล้ว

    312 BCE.. kilometres.. Any aqueducts still functioning?

  • @TheDavidlloydjones
    @TheDavidlloydjones ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hod id they work?
    Gravity.
    Thank you for asking.
    Next question, please...

  • @HansDunkelberg1
    @HansDunkelberg1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Perhaps the Pont du Gard is filled with unusually much calcium residue because it has been used especially long. I think I've read about a use of it until the days of Charlemagne, around AD 800. Perhaps the slaves, who have been of a considerable influence among the Christians, have stopped cleansing the bridge's conduit in the later times.

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The gradient flow was extremely low. A famous aspect of this channel.

    • @HansDunkelberg1
      @HansDunkelberg1 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AncientRomeLive That sounds plausible. Still, also with an especially quick accumulation of residue it should have been possible to clean the thing up. And perhaps neglect has been stronger at such a remote place than with the also long-used Aqua Virgo close to the city of Rome.

    • @EllieMaes-Grandad
      @EllieMaes-Grandad ปีที่แล้ว

      'Soft' water is low in calcium, so it will depend on sources themselves and the ground over which the water travelled.

    • @HansDunkelberg1
      @HansDunkelberg1 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EllieMaes-Grandad I do not really understand what you mean.

    • @EllieMaes-Grandad
      @EllieMaes-Grandad ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HansDunkelberg1 Hard water, soft water - look up calcium deposits in kettles . . .

  • @snotnosewilly99
    @snotnosewilly99 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Aqueduct at 0:22 appears to be made from concrete, with a facing of stone.

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes, that portion - in concrete- was "blobbed" onto- as a further stabilizer- the previously existing tuff block construction of the Aqua Claudia.

  • @rlccar8518
    @rlccar8518 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    -10 points for use of "iconic" (sorry had to be said 😄)
    BUT! Very nice video. I especially liked the part about the equipment used for measuring.

  • @c-historia
    @c-historia ปีที่แล้ว

    meraviglioso!

  • @chrisbelsito4231
    @chrisbelsito4231 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Absolutely amazing!!! Just blows my mind

  • @bluefairy9683
    @bluefairy9683 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am shocked when i was there Segovia to see it

  • @MySamurai77
    @MySamurai77 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Maybe lead isn't the best choice to pipe you water.

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Haha- but as noted, it was coated in calcium- so lead poisoning wasn't an issue..

    • @MySamurai77
      @MySamurai77 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AncientRomeLive Did they even know what lead poisoning was back then i wonder?

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@MySamurai77 Yes, indeed. Vitruvius mentions this fact. It was well known that those that poured the molten lead into sheets to be rolled and soldered into pipes got sick from the fumes.

  • @jacksonmeyer-vl2np
    @jacksonmeyer-vl2np ปีที่แล้ว

    wow!

  • @chomocharlie3997
    @chomocharlie3997 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    8:24, Did the Romans suffer lead poisoning?

    • @EllieMaes-Grandad
      @EllieMaes-Grandad ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I've seen mention in literature that they did. Presumably determined from bone analysis of skeletons, not that they'd have known much about the problem back then.

    • @fabiana.4640
      @fabiana.4640 ปีที่แล้ว

      They probably suffered much more lead poisoning by the use of adding lead acetate to wine than from the plumbing system

  • @saelind73
    @saelind73 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this Dario? 😀

  • @hardsums32
    @hardsums32 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    First, we like your programs very much, but the Roman's did not have decimal or percentages. They used ratio's, as we did ourselves until recently. so we all understand ratio's. Kilometers are also a pain.

    • @SIMpip374
      @SIMpip374 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      lol kilometres are only a pain for Americans, the rest of the world, not so much! You all need to buck up and use measurements the rest of the world uses. 😉

    • @hardsums32
      @hardsums32 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SIMpip374 The rest of the world are wrong.

  • @N.SaiSriram
    @N.SaiSriram ปีที่แล้ว

    👍

  • @matacabrones4317
    @matacabrones4317 ปีที่แล้ว

    the "groma" was nothing more than a ceremonial instrument. The "chorobates" had only one central leg. And you didn't talk at all about siphons, widely used by the romans to cross valleys, much more numerous and cheaper than aqueduct arcs

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว

      Not sure about it only being ceremonial... Yes, there is more to discuss on aqueducts- including the siphon systems.. In the next in the series!

    • @matacabrones4317
      @matacabrones4317 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AncientRomeLive yes, it was ceremonial, only used to trace the Cardus and Decumanus
      th-cam.com/video/h7GNADKOC54/w-d-xo.html
      th-cam.com/video/vEB8-upx1xs/w-d-xo.html

  • @photographedemode
    @photographedemode ปีที่แล้ว

    🙏

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thank you! We have 2 more videos on aqueducts!

  • @1962recon
    @1962recon ปีที่แล้ว

    The short answer is gravity.

  • @wadevictor
    @wadevictor ปีที่แล้ว

    Fascinating so it was against the law to expose rubbish to the water where did the waste go obvious a lasting system would have been in place👁️👁️

    • @Blackadder75
      @Blackadder75 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      the romans also had the cloaca maxima. aka the big sewer. it would collect the waste water and I guess dump it in the river

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      For Rome, the gravity flow system concluded with the Tiber. For each city it was different, but culminating with a river was pretty standard. Otherwise, the sea.

  • @cjyoung4080
    @cjyoung4080 ปีที่แล้ว

    yummy. Lead water.

  • @eastcoastsailingcenter7768
    @eastcoastsailingcenter7768 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Aliens built it .. graham hancock

  • @Slo-ryde
    @Slo-ryde ปีที่แล้ว

    These are majestic structures, but they were also easy targets for the barbarians invading the empire, and surrounding a city fed by aqueducts… all they had to do is dislodge the flow by busting up the conduit in a small place….. and viola, no water for the town!!!

    • @AncientRomeLive
      @AncientRomeLive  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Exactly! They were made when Rome provided the security!

  • @escapematrixenterprisejacq7810
    @escapematrixenterprisejacq7810 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    AGUA APPIA????? Its ACQUA

  • @zacharyhinschberger2414
    @zacharyhinschberger2414 ปีที่แล้ว

    Simply amazing. The time and effort they put into everything with the intent for it to last forever! So I'm assuming lead poisoning for many people though with the piping??

  • @petrusinvictus3603
    @petrusinvictus3603 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sorry, wrong video.

  • @peterjohnson617
    @peterjohnson617 ปีที่แล้ว

    gravity

  • @jamesgrossman9955
    @jamesgrossman9955 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gravity!

  • @johnperkins7111
    @johnperkins7111 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Short story gravity.

  • @golgumbazguide...4113
    @golgumbazguide...4113 ปีที่แล้ว

    Explore

  • @ChristopherLecky
    @ChristopherLecky 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What they achieved isn't as significant as the realisation of the variables of that solution which should have been what we continued to explore being that variation creates the necessary complexity within our solutions to ensure longevity sustainability and the overall stability of our civilisation.....! in other words lean to heavily on any one option and what ever long term effects or consequences occur are maximised by our population density and future population predictions crippling the planets ability to sequester the impact of our dominance.,,, ,FACT

  • @KadenSpencer-i3n
    @KadenSpencer-i3n ปีที่แล้ว

    i love u ❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @2cartalkers
    @2cartalkers ปีที่แล้ว

    Gravity.

  • @ГогоГого-э3ю
    @ГогоГого-э3ю ปีที่แล้ว

    Интересно узнать как древние узнавали или вичесляли пад водяного столба ??? ...
    Ау-у-у-у-у-у, гидроинженьори-и-и-и-и !!! ...

  • @benquinneyiii7941
    @benquinneyiii7941 ปีที่แล้ว

    Buildup

  • @oreilly1237878
    @oreilly1237878 ปีที่แล้ว

    But they arent Roman.They come from their predecessors.

    • @gbae636
      @gbae636 ปีที่แล้ว

      What??

    • @IrishCinnsealach
      @IrishCinnsealach ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The first aqueduct was built in 312 BC, and supplied a water fountain at the city's cattle market. By the 3rd century AD, the city had eleven aqueducts, sustaining a population of over a million in a water-extravagant economy; most of the water supplied the city's many public baths

  • @nobodythatyouknow241
    @nobodythatyouknow241 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Water runs down hill. That's how they work.