Interesting how scholars work through text to such an extent that lectures are read out loud. I wonder if other forms of knowledge would emerge if scholars were able to produce orally, preferably in dialogue.
In my opinion; speaking without looking at the text would create empathy rather than imparting information. This would mean less science and more life.
Isn’t that essentially what a colloquium is? A colloquy is a conversation, and especially an important, high-level discussion. Colloquy and colloquium once meant the same thing, though today colloquium always refers to a conference. Because of its old "conversation" meaning, however, a colloquium is a type of conference with important question-and-answer periods.
Interesting how scholars work through text to such an extent that lectures are read out loud. I wonder if other forms of knowledge would emerge if scholars were able to produce orally, preferably in dialogue.
Wtf she on about? Was key debates in anthropology a real staged event or a compiled series of written correspondence
@@daniel3231995 real staged events compilled in books
In my opinion; speaking without looking at the text would create empathy rather than imparting information. This would mean less science and more life.
Isn’t that essentially what a colloquium is?
A colloquy is a conversation, and especially an important, high-level discussion. Colloquy and colloquium once meant the same thing, though today colloquium always refers to a conference. Because of its old "conversation" meaning, however, a colloquium is a type of conference with important question-and-answer periods.