ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ค. 2024
- Get ready to witness one of the most groundbreaking games in the history of chess! Tigran Petrogyan introduces a revolutionary concept that still has chess enthusiasts talking to this day. Prepare to be amazed by this brilliant idea that has its own chapter in many middle game manuals. Don't miss out on this historic game, hit that subscribe button and join us for an incredible journey through chess history!
Join Chess.com here--- www.chess.com/?ref_id=9886904
The 3 best books I know for Chess Strategy and Understanding (Amazon Affiliate links)
amzn.to/3u9CjuN An Absolute Classic
amzn.to/3o4Voe0 Will make you an expert on many different chess structures
amzn.to/3AGFBqB The single greatest book ever written on chess structures
_____________________________________________________________________________
If you have received value from this video please be sure to like and subscribe.
Please Consider Donating paypal.me/ChessDawg1?locale.x...
Lichess handle: Johnnyballgame
Chess.com handle: Johnnyballgame
00:00 Historic Context
00:46 The Game Begins
06:38 Petrosian's Brilliant Concept - เกม
Dawg, really appreciate how you focus on the classics. You can learn a ton from those guys.
Yes. Much nicer than people covering all the modern games all the time
Oh No....not a a dawg at all!
@@TheBebelehautcat?
Very educative...
Although I’ve seen so many openings so many times, really appreciate you discussing the rationale behind moves.
Dating myself here, but I had the honor of playing Reshevsky in a simul shortly before he died (I lost). That guy’s mind was sharp as a tack right up to the end.
The exchange sacrifice for purely positional color domination is beyond human!
And let’s not forget Sammy immediately recognizing how profound and good the concept was.
Many chess players admitted that Petrosyan saw the game from the very beginning. 70 years have passed, and only now can a modern program see the hidden power of this step. So this once again proves that Petrosian played with complete understanding, as befits a modern chess program. Maybe Petrosian had the power of Stockfish? Who knows?
the problem is that a human will inevitably make an error at some point, while stockfish does not. it would be nice if stockfish could provide "his thoughts" behind the way he plays.
@@homerp.hendelbergenheinzel6649 It should be taken into account that Petrosian was simply played with the man and exploit the weakness of the human, not the weakness of the powerful Stockfish. If he had the opportunity to play with Stockfish, perhaps he could have played differently. By the way, there is Dr. Chess, who plays equally with both Stockfish and L0. Try it and you will see that Stockfish is not the only one. Success.
@@homerp.hendelbergenheinzel6649 It should be taken into account that Petrosian was simply played with the man and exploit the weakness of the human, not the weakness of the powerful Stockfish. If he had the opportunity to play with Stockfish, perhaps he could have played differently. By the way, there is Dr. Chess, who plays equally with both Stockfish and L0. Try it and you will see that Stockfish is not the only one. Success.
One time I heard a statement that I've greatly been admiring: "One can learn from a game played by Petrosian, more than he could've learnt from seven games of other GMs. This giant, really, had a very sharp and far sighted strategic vision.
Ironman --- probably the hardest player to beat as he always played for a draw & one of the best defenders of alltime.
Wonderful insights! Thank You Sir.
You sound exactly like Agent Smith from the Matrix. Looking forward to more vids!
I really didn't see the essence of the move until you showed knight e7 then Nd5...what a splendid idea....I'm impressed 😂
Very nicely presented. Thank you!
Great professional edits. Showing the arrows and attacked squared to support your speech
A very nice game, of course, although I must admit that when I saw it for the first time in the book, I did not understand anything. Luckily, now I can recognize the position before Re6 any time. Will you do a follow-up with Gligoric's (?) Rf4 in the King's Indian please?
Thanks!
Thank you so much for your kindness.
Hi sir thx. For your nice analysis
Actual goated game
Would of loved to see an endgame
I think this video fails to stress enough, how stupidly placed the whites pieces were after the exchange sacrifice, thus justifying it. A deep move in this position, it needed a deeper explanation.
Hello, 9:05 in my opinion: after Bd3 white can play R:d3 cd and Q:d3. If ba white can play Ra3
All the Moves before made that Move possible.
Even myself as a poor blitz player do this...
Hell with my rook if opponent's minor piece is a thorn in my pupil.
Sometimes I do exchange sac to preserve my very active bishop...
9,03 Hello, in my opinion : after Bd3 white can play R:d3! Petrosian's idea! And cd Q:d3 white is good. If ba Ba3+/-
Exchange sacrifice:
Rooks are very powerful on an open board but are clumsy in middle games -
where they can then be worth less than a Bishop or a Knight.
I appreciate your choice of showing Petrossian's artistic strategy. Prophylaxy at the highest level.
Hell nah. Petrosian was never better but managed drawing as a notorious drawing player. He was the Giri of his time.
I could this Pertrosian guy becoming a world champion 🙂
Sup Dawg!
👍🔥👏
hey cool story
Nobody likes the end game
I tried to emulate Petrosian but his games are weird for me
I believe Morphy sac'd the exchange quite frequently. That would mean Petrosian did not introduce the idea to chess. Please advise. Thanks.
A positional sacrifice is different from a tactical sacrifice. Sacrificing the exchange to win a couple of pawns, or because you're removing one of the defenders of the king, leading to a potential checkmate, is not the same as sacrificing the exchange to remove a strong piece from the board for long-term compensation.
Thanks
@@rg7535That sac is also positional no? Morphy did that to bring his last piece into the game the h1 rook
@@bdpv025 If you’re referring to his most famous game, A Night at the Opera, no, it was an entirely tactical sacrifice. He sac’ed the exchange to give mate with the rook on (if I’m not mistaken) d8.
8 yr old Reshevsky is much stronger than 8 yr old Fischer
Hmmm is the guy narrating ai? Firdt 5 seconds i was sus
Well, THAT's anticlimactic! After all that buildup about what a wonderful game this was, it turns out to end in a draw.
Never watch cricket
Your analysis is too fast. I have to play at 0.5 speed to follow
Nothing wrong with Tigran. I do not know if this was groundbreaking. What is groundbreaking is Tigran L. Petrosian. What an embarrassment.
This game did not change the way chess is played. Petrosian's positional exchange sacrifice was nothing new. Ståhlberg and Keres give the move an exclamation mark but not a word of comment in their tournament book. Lasker's positional queen sacrifice against Euwe in Zürich 1934 is much more impressive.
Cool move, but never do this at home.
I can't understand why they agreed to a draw at that juncture. Can someone illuminate me?