A very good video, thank you for that! Could you please make a video where both players choose between diffrent strategies? I think that would help me to understand the intuition better. I watched your intuition video about this topic but I think making a video like this with different strategies would help me to understand it even faster.
Thank you for the amazing video! I'm wondering does this game have two pure strategy nash equilibrium of (Hawk Dove) and (Dove Hawk) as well? So if we were asked to find the NEs, do we present all three NE (both pure and mixed strategy)?
so, does this then mean that player 1 should assume that player 2 will play Hawk, given a 75% probability, and should therefore play Dove? In which case, the Nash equilibrium is (D,H)?
Very wonderful video .
Thank you for all what you do
I love your videos!
A very good video, thank you for that!
Could you please make a video where both players choose between diffrent strategies? I think that would help me to understand the intuition better. I watched your intuition video about this topic but I think making a video like this with different strategies would help me to understand it even faster.
My professor is cooked. Great work!!
so there is no specific NE the way there is in pure strategy, it is just the fraction as the answer?
What if the value of p comes out to be negative but q is positive and less than 1?
Thank you for the amazing video! I'm wondering does this game have two pure strategy nash equilibrium of (Hawk Dove) and (Dove Hawk) as well? So if we were asked to find the NEs, do we present all three NE (both pure and mixed strategy)?
so, does this then mean that player 1 should assume that player 2 will play Hawk, given a 75% probability, and should therefore play Dove? In which case, the Nash equilibrium is (D,H)?
HAWK TUAH!!!!!
love your videos but its not hak its hawk