calling functions is not "noisy" learn the damn language once and for all kids and stop complaining, the reason Rich is moving to this is because he learned and accepted that he didn't know JS that well and that he messed up.
This is similar to the good parts of React, though; not the bad. The only reason you find Svelte 4 intuitive is because you’re used to it by now. The runes introduced in Svelte 5 are objectively better in capabilities; give it a fair try and the DX will be as good or better as what you’re currently used to.
the difference is automatic dependency tracking and fingrained updates, this is 1000x better than the let and $ stuff before. Now you Svelties need to learn proper JS.
At 3:04, to me it makes no sense to refactor it like that. You are stating that the function only has one variable by the definition, and the height is constant. If you want reactivity on the height then add it as an argument to the function
the whole thing is a compiler. they could have used something less noisy and compile it to whatever
Exactly
calling functions is not "noisy" learn the damn language once and for all kids and stop complaining, the reason Rich is moving to this is because he learned and accepted that he didn't know JS that well and that he messed up.
I like $: and export let. I find them very intuitive. Now it just seems like React
This is similar to the good parts of React, though; not the bad. The only reason you find Svelte 4 intuitive is because you’re used to it by now. The runes introduced in Svelte 5 are objectively better in capabilities; give it a fair try and the DX will be as good or better as what you’re currently used to.
you find them very intuitive because you have no idea what you are talking about. learn the damn language before you decide to use a framework.
@@ivan.jeremic that's unnecessarily aggressive. Especially on a comment more than a month old. Got time huh?
Actually liked it. Intentions are clear, we're getting something more explicit
basically, runes == react hooks
the difference is automatic dependency tracking and fingrained updates, this is 1000x better than the let and $ stuff before. Now you Svelties need to learn proper JS.
Still not convinced
that's because you don't know javascript
At 3:04, to me it makes no sense to refactor it like that. You are stating that the function only has one variable by the definition, and the height is constant. If you want reactivity on the height then add it as an argument to the function
Well explained 👍
Thank you 🙂
i mean of course people gonna be upset when you make another vue/react framework
this makes it easier, not more difficult. people see more syntax and automatically assume it's more complicated.
@@eyz-4how?
Thank you 👍
This is for you Paul!
I dont like it AT ALL.
Svelte took a wrong turn.
svelte decided that writing javascript is the right thing to do what is wrong with that? You don't know JavaScript?🤣🤣🤣🤣
The fix is worse than the original issues.
svelte decided that writing javascript is the right thing to do what is wrong with that? You don't know JavaScript?🤣🤣🤣🤣
it makes non sense, so how is this different from React?
Runes: bringing php into svelte
wow, I knew that the Svelte community is mostly beginners but I had no idea that you guys have really no idea how code works.