💽 Track Mixing: edthorne.com/mixing 🎬 Can A DI Box REALLY Make A Difference? th-cam.com/video/HeE57eYXjF8/w-d-xo.html 🎬 Scarlett 4th Generation vs 3rd Gen: th-cam.com/video/_LDDzsxp1a0/w-d-xo.html
Could you rank those interfaces in Top 10 please, which one of them are having better performance when comparing to other interfaces in this list. Thank you
@@rickytanjun-hong1490 I don’t want to rank them for fear of offending people but I can tell you I think the following: BEST SOUND - Tascam; BEST VALUE FOR MONEY - Scarlett; BEST OVERALL - Audient. 🙂
@@EdThorne ok so I was planning on buying the 3rd gen Scarlett solo and using a AudioTechnica At2020 with a Beardynamic Dt770 pro 250ohm version and I was wondering if that would work and if there would be issues
Hey dude, loved all the info you gave in this video. Clearly you are not sponsored by any of these companies and you say clearly what are the good and bad things of any of them. I am really into buying the Focusrite one, but I do have one question about the direct input monitor dial. Thanks man!
I brought a secondhand imac with Logic Pro installed. I have a very basic system. I would love any of the interfaces. From doing a lot of research on TH-cam and tutorial to help me with my music production. SSL seem to be right up there when it comes to quality, so i'm going with the SSL2. great presentation.
thought the Steinberg UR22c sounded nice especially with the acoustic guitar adding some nice upper mids, just looking at different options for sound cards/audio interfaces as I haven't got one yet, some great vids reviewing different options on this channel, keep up the good work!
Ed Thorne, I originally was thinking of getting the Apollo twin X like you as it has the bonus of coming with some great plugins like the LA-2A and others. Although with the dsp problem that you had and also with it being out of my price range when I checked, I probably won’t get it. Other than that I’ve heard some of the audient and focusrite products are good, and I’ll wait to see your verdict on the Scarlett vs Clarett. Otherwise I’m open to more suggestions and will be doing more research on entry audio interfaces
Thanks, Ed. Ha, yeh, this was back in the day before I realised that TH-camr’s can A) get sent stuff for free to review and B) get paid for their time to do so. I bought all of these on a credit card and sent them all back after the video for a refund 🤣
Congratulations on 1k man. I think the ADAT compatibility on the audient gives it an edge, it can grow with your setup instead of impeding it, plus buckets of headroom and nice clean preamps are never a bad thing. The Steinberg does sound surprisingly good though!
Under rated feature for sure. ADAT compatibility makes this device something you're not gonna end up selling when you end up needing more inputs in the future.
Thanks for this!!Loved the logic file comparison format, easy to see and hear. From a bass players perspective, really like the audient and the SSL with 4k. Only reason I prefer the Audient is the SSL2 only sounds as good with the 4k engaged whereas the Audeint that is it standard sound.
I’m glad you found the video useful 🙏 The SSL is lovely in L4K mode but I know you mean in comparison to the Audient, which is a very clear sounding interface.
I'm an incoming classical piano master's student looking to get into recording, so I've been diving into learning about all the necessary equipment. I'm really glad that I found your channel and this video in particular, as I'm an audio interface and a (better) pair of mics away from really getting off the ground! Thanks for doing ALL of these comparisons - my favorite among these might be the Scarlett 2i2 without Air, especially listening to the guitar samples. Looking forward to your future comparison and educational videos!
Thank you, Alex, I appreciate the support. I’m glad you found the video useful, there’s plenty more coming. Is there anything you’d specifically like to learn/see?
@@EdThorne Looking forward to future videos with Behringer and MOTU interfaces to round out the relatively budget interfaces! Also, I know this information is out there, but it'd be great to have some of this consolidated on one place: deeper explanation of specs and what they mean (e.g. different types of inputs), maybe comparisons of mics and explanations of miking patterns and techniques. And, I've yet to see a great, thorough blind listening test that compares several audio interfaces - I feel like this could provide some raw, unbiased thoughts on how an audio interface performs.
I'm glad you mentioned the issue with the gain setting on the Mackie. I have one such unit with the same problem. Most likely a design defect. BTW, I like your videos. Short, clear and to the point. And you obviously know what you're talking about.
This was extremely thorough which I appreciate! I've been doing nonstop research on different audio interfaces but actually getting to hear them in use is great! Really enjoyed the Focusrite in air mode also enjoyed the Steinberg can't put my finger on it but I feel it'd suit my voice well lol. Looking forward to the video on the Motu M4 it's another I'm curious about.
Hi, glad you found the video helpful. The Scarlett in AIR mode is nice. My fave was the Tascam. I’ve no-idea when I can get hold of a Motu, there’s none in the UK at the mo.
@@EdThorne My Tascam US4x4 died after 3 years (its main board fried or something) and replacing it would cost me 200eur. I am afraid to buy another tascam even thou they have release a new HR series.
Been producing music using only my laptop and I am still looking for a budget interface ever since. I came across this video, what a wonderful shoot out. I think SSL's price is worth it after hearing its amazing quality. Thank you for this video. Keep safe!
Dude, you did a great comparison and explanations along with the sound that produced from each products, it helps me so much since i have plan to buy one of those products. Anyway, I'm pretty interested in Focusrite 2i2 but i wish to get free Steinberg UR22 from you 😅
Great video Ed. A really good overview. I'm pretty interested in that Steinberg with the mobile recording applications. Having kids who are being encouraged into music, recording, making videos and such, doing so on the iPad is so much more familiar to them than the laptop. Something like this would help make that step into music production without changing device (or at least keeping my machine free!)
Fantastic video mate! been liking the Audient a lot but the SSL seems an amazing interface! Great to have big obvious knob for level on the top panel too!
There were indeed only slight differences between these. For me with vocals, the standouts were the Steinberg and the Audient. The Steinberg had more clarity (not just additional brightness like the Focustrite with Air) and the Audient felt like it had more headroom and slightly richer low mids. It seemed to "breathe" more. I personally didn't like the Focusrite Air mode. I had a Scarlett 2i4 2nd Gen before and since then, an Audient iD4 then more recently the iD14 MKII. To me, the Audient preamps and converters sound significantly more transparent than the Scarlett 2i4 I had (much less difference here) and the preamps are way less noisy. Also as a guitar player, I never could get a really good tone out of amp sims with the Scarlett, the high impedance instrument input of both the iD4 and iD14 MKII solved that. Noticeably wider frequency range of the direct recorded signal, better preserved highs and more natural "feel".
My SSL 2 crapped out on me after a year of use ... it got increasingly more 'buzzy' and the second instrument channel doesn't work at all. They feel like gimmicky plastic pieces of junk to me ... but that's just been my experience. I may have gotten a lemon, but although they've been getting great reviews, beware of the SSL 2.
@@Fiveash-Art I've been hearing more and more bad stuff about the SSL interfaces... I would say, from my experience, that they feel definitively flimsy and cheap in your hands. It feels far from a premium product. On the other hand, Audient has been killing it. I got myself an Evo 16, and damn, that's a pretty and great piece of hardware, mind-blown.
@@sapv I'm having some sort of grounding issue and I think it may be possible it was the M1 Mac mini not having a proper ground plug. I can't believe Apple is still making these things like this. I bought a 'ground loop isolator' by some company online. I'm going to see if that helps the issue. I may have jumped the gun blaming the SSL 2 ... it seemed great when I first started with it. ... but yeah, it does seem kind of cheaply made. If the issue continues I'm thinking of buying the focus rite Clarett ...
I recently got a Tascam US 16 08 for less than 300 pounds and it was an absolute game changer. With 10 input preamps and really transparent signal processing I'm able to do so much more.
More or less same features and quality in this particular price range. M-AUDIO and N.I. look gorgeous though, besides the great sound quality! Totally loved the Steinbergs' sound!
Oh well I've missed the competition, but still liked the video, very informative as I was looking to uograde from my presonus audiobox 96 usb to the focusrite, but I now have a few more options, maybe looking at getting an interface with more inputs, but this has made me look at other brands. Brill video. If you've had a chance to test the beringer can you let me know? Cheers
Mav T Thanks Mat. Glad you found it useful. Yeh there’s plenty of options these days. My favourite was the Tascam. I’ll see about the Behringer when I can get hold of one.
Thank you very much that your comparison on that few of audio interface. If very great to share out to let more people know about it and glad i came across with your channel!!!!
So far have not been able to decide which interface is best suited for my needs. Leaning towards possibly a Steinberg, Tascam, or Roland. This video helped a lot!
sa4aadpuppies I’m glad you found it useful, thanks for watching. Yeh, I don’t think the KA2 stands up next to the others, especially the Tascam which sounds great
I read other reviews about how better the mic preamps are on the SSL2 in this price range. I heard the obvious difference in this video when you demonstrated the vocal. It really jumped out as the most natural sound compared to the others.
Enjoyed this and a couple of other of your vids on the subject and hit the subscribe button as I believe your style of presentation and coverage deserve more subbers imo! Still struggling to decide though haha Currently don't have an interface as I've only got some M-Audio AV32s and Sennheiser HD25s for my home studio. Planning to upgrade to some KRKs or maybe Yamahas (model to be decided) and some Beyerdynamic 770pros with their higher impedance. Would prefer an audio interface with space for two sets of monitor inputs over other inter-connectivity as my instruments are virtual and my neighbours have banned me from singing too 😂 Good idea to let us hear the difference between them all plus show the wavetable as the aforementioned monitors make it difficult to hear the difference (hence the urgent upgrade!!) Thansk for the great reviews man
Thanks for the subscribe 🙂 The Antelope ZenGo offer two headphone outputs with independently controllable and mixable sends. Most other, lower cost interfaces with two HP outs send the same mix out of both.
@@EdThorne Thanks for that. As far as the headphone outputs are concerned, I've been using Sennheiser HD25s for a year but plan to get some beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro so wanted an easy way to compare the two in mixdown :)
Excellent presentation. Very complete and satisfactory tests. Although they all sound pretty good I have to agree with you that the Tascam sounds slightly better than those closest to it. The sound is so tight, so compressed.
@@EdThorne Keep up the great work with your videos. They are packed full of info for a budding home player trying to make himself sound a bit better. (I am of course talking about myself). Your videos are very helpful when trying to make decisions.
It’s been over two years since I’ve used the Tascam but I’d from memory I’d say it has cleaner preamps. The Volts do sound good though. Defo get the 76 version with the compressor.
Great video, I got the 2i2 recently but I've had nothing but problems with the drivers not working on Win10. Thanks for showing me there are so many other options!
A MILLION thanks - My main concerns are noise and having a little extra Mike gain for my stage quality dynamic Mics. I gave my kid my Scarlett 2i2, and I’m thinking of stepping up to a 4x4. Q: at that point, our multi track mixers in the same price range for comparable low noise and clean signal? (meaning I wouldn’t consider something like a Behringer if you paid me!)
So Nice. I’m very glad you did all this comparison. You deserve our applaud and subscription😊🙏 And can you please tell me which audio interface go best with Shure SM7B? I don’t want to use cloud-lifter or booster. Let me know And Thank You again.
Ed Thorne yeah, I agree haha. Do you think it needs cloudlifter? I watched Kruse video on M audio interface with SM7b, it has ground noise (but the quietest). He said cloudlifter makes it worse haha. Just wondering your opinion and usage maybe with SM7b
OllieJ Games It depends on your interface. Most interfaces under $200 only have an input gain of around 55dB, which is enough if you’re a loud singer but the last 10% of the gain structure on these devices introduces noise so you can’t use all 55dB. So I’d suggest a cloud lifter then. Or, combine your interface and cloud lifter money and get an SSL/Audient/Apollo which have loads of clean gain.
direct audio comparisons: exactly what I was looking for. Thanks. However: listening to the examples on youtube via my iMac and Bose active external PC speakers I must say: I am as confused as I was before.
gregorheinrich Yeh there’s very little difference between them. The only one that really stand out for me was the Tascam, and maybe the SSL with 4K Mode.
Thank a lot for all the time you put into this. You help me a lot building my Homestudio and i can't thank you enough. The interface i prefere even if there's no big difference like you said would be the Ssl m, presonus and focusrite. I wonder, which is your fav one?
Exalt Studio You’re welcome, I’m glad you found it useful. I liked the Tascam the best, but legacy 4K on the SSL is nice and the Scarlett comes with loads of great stuff. The Steinberg is promising too with the DSP processing.
@@EdThorne Would decide in the coming 2-3 months. Now my new house including studio setup is under construction. Which interface you suggest for best vocals. Should I go with iD 14 MKII+ ASP 880 Pream.
@@HarvinderSingh-yy8th That’s great news about the studio! Do you need ten inputs for just vocals? I’d suggest a designated single channel preamp, unless you’re recording drums too(?)
Hey Ed, what do you think of the Audient ID 22 vs the 14 here. I see they have similar or the same converters but I was looking into getting the SSL 2 and just getting rid of my Audient ID22 since I've had it since 2016. Not really sure if it's an upgrade or downgrade really. Just wanted to know your opinion on sound. They all sound good to my ears. Thanks!
The iD22 has some great features (alt monitor outs, insert send/returns if you have outboard gear), and the assignable F buttons. It seems a more functional desktop controller than the iD14, more akin to the Apollo. Sound wise, personally, I'd stay with the Audient over the SSL. The SSL isn't fitted with the famous E-Channel strip preamps that SSL are famous for. They definitely play on the fact that people make that assumption.
No. The iD software basically allows you to re-route your inputs. You can monitor through a reverb plugin on a channel strip in Logic but this will introduce latency. For monitor return processing, the Antelope ZenGo and UA Apollo’s are the best devices for this (also a lot more expensive due to the DSP processing required to enable effect monitoring with sub 2ms latency)
Thank you 😊🙏 Personally I think the Clarett has the better sounding preamps and it is ADAT expandable if you want to add more inputs to your set up later. In terms of monitoring flexibility though, the (new) Audient iD14mkii is my favourite interface in this price range. Full review of that here: th-cam.com/video/TCW9HVfG03M/w-d-xo.html
Thank you very much for the video. Very dynamic and informative. I'm hesitating between buying a tascam us 4x4HR and a Roland Rubix 44. It's for recording acoustic instruments and playing live with Ableton. Could you tell me which one would you choose? Thank you!
@@EdThorne Thanks again. I really apreciate the Quick answer. Its Sounds amazing, but its too expensive for me. That is the reason to go for the rubix, the behringer or the Tascam
Hi Ed, Great comparison session. Whilst I'm torn between the Focusrite & the Tascam, my choice has been made more complex by the discontinuation of the Tascam model tested, in favour of the higher spec'd US2x2HR model. Can you please give me any thoughts on how I should make my choice & any early view/rumours on the upgraded Tascam 2x2HR? (From your video, my initial focus areas were the direct monitoring/headphone output & the supplied software bundles.) Thanks in anticipation...
Hi There, thanks. The HR version brings the product in line with other interfaces with 192kHz converters. I don’t think you’d hear a difference between the 96k on the US model and this but it’s a sensible move from Tascam. In terms of direct monitoring, IMHO the Scarlett is pretty poor. The best interfaces in this video for DM are the Audient, SSL and M-Audio. It might be worth looking at the new iD14 mrkii. Regarding the software, this is where the Scarlett does well but almost all of these interfaces come with a free DAW of some kind.
Great video with a lot of information man thank you! If you had to pick a beginner set as a gift for a vocal teacher singer/songwriter who also happens to be your girlfriend who’s just starting out. Which would you go with ? Asking for a friend......
Thank you and GREAT question. I would highly recommend the Scarlett Studio Pack. It has everything she needs 🙂 th-cam.com/video/YCEgbEtqnc4/w-d-xo.html
Found out what the stereo monitoring mode is. It treats Inputs ch1 as left and ch2 as right. Whereas mono mode sums them together and send them to both your ears. I like the air mode too!
@@EdThorne Well I wondered about that. When I've used them before I've ways had wound all the way one way or the other to be fair... isn't their gonna be latency issues anyway mixing life in with DAW reply... if ur recording the live in? Would it be better to just open the input for monitoring in the DAW and just listen to yourself through the DAW??
Thank you for playing the same bit for all the interfaces. I hate when an entire verse of a song is played through multiple units for comparison with switching between units mid verse. I can't compare quality if I'm also comparing the different parts of the song at the same time.
Fast forward to March 2021. Just got an AUDIENT EVO 8. The first one was defective, with no audible Mic input heard on the headphones. Got a replacement from Sweetwater here in the USA. I really like the EVO 8! The FOUR COMBO inputs are so versatile. I can even take a cell phone audio, using a 1/8 to split 1/4 cable, and get a great signal. Whereas with USB interfaces like the MOTU M4, or Scarlett 4i4, that won't work using the 1/4" jacks in the back of the units. They are LINE LEVEL inputs, can only accept signals from a Mixer line out or such, which are very different in voltages and resistance as compared to, say the 1/4" jacks of a mixer which are meant for cell phones, tablets or MP3 players. Maybe the USB power from a laptop is just not adequate for that purpose. Anyone know?
the tascam and the ssl 2 had very clear upper end over the other ones, the mackie was all over the place. the steinberg seemed to even out the dynamics on its own.
@@Tobz.X Audio interfaces don't have frame rates, that's video. If you are recording for video, the best sample rate for the interface will be 48kHz or 96kHz (then down-sample to 48kHz).
Great review - which interface would you go for if you want to drive high impedance 'phones (am looking at DT770 either 80 or 250 ohms) as i am unable to produce on monitors currently.
Which interface do you suggest for mixing? I'm looking for an interface that does not heat up when it is on for long periods of time. Which of these including the new UAD Volt would have better headphone/monitor output sound for mixing. I have an Apollo USB I use for recording but it does heat up when I keep it on for a while, I do not want to lose it as the sound is great.
Thanks for watching. The headphone out on the Scarlett isn’t the loudest, I struggled to get a good balance/level with the direct monitoring feature. I go into more detail in the Studio Pack review here: th-cam.com/video/YCEgbEtqnc4/w-d-xo.html
Thank you so much Ed for the detailed explanation. I am new to recording. I do vocals and play the Guitar. Could you kindly help me decide between the M Audio and the SSL2? Focusrite is the most obvious one to fall for for its popularity n the Air feature. However I also liked the looks of the Volume Control of the M-Audio and the SSL2 and as you said there is not much vast difference in these entry level Sound Cards. Would love to hear from you on your final recommendation to help me decide. Was also considering M Audio 192/6 and SSL 2+ if M-Audio n SSL are good. Also are these durable enough as compared to the Focusrite knowing these are new products. Many users did face problem with M-Audio as per reviews. However since this is called the M-Audio Air. Thank you so much in advance. Stay blessed. :)
AmlanAstaLaVista Thanks Amlan, I’m glad you found the video useful. Personally, I think the SSL sounds slightly better, it has a higher input gain, and a cleaner signal towards the top end of the input gain. The headphone output is louder and cleaner too than the M-Audio. That said, the direct monitoring on the M-Audio is good, it’s easy to get a good headphone mix with it. The SSL is also fine though. Legacy 4K Mode on the SSL is lovely. The SSL is more expensive though so it’s a toss up. Personally, I think the Tascam sounds the best out of all the interfaces in the video.
If I'm wanting to upgrade from my Scarlet 18i8 with a max budget of $1000 and I need 2 mic inputs and 2 inputs for something like an AxeFX or Helix, is the Audient ID44, Arturia AudioFuse and Clarette+ 4 the only 3 real options?
There's a lot of features & opinions for each product. It would be great to see a table of this info or link to one on your website. It would be interesting with a high quality audio source playing the same demo into the interfaces to compare the audio for each (attempt to normalize preamp gain, double check by normalize wave files after recording, check noise floor & dynamic range). How much do we need to spend to get great preamp, great headphone mix/output, great everything (if it exists)?
Отличное видео! Я не разбираюсь в записи гитары и ничего не могу сказать по поводу звучания. Но в записи вокала для меня однозначно выиграл Tascam. Хуже всех на мой взгляд оказался Mackie. У Focusrite и Steinberg задрат верх, как мне показалось. Спасибо за вашу работу! Что вы можете сказать подробнее про M-Audio?
HI Ed ... thinking about substituting my old Apogee Jam with a newer Audio Interface from your list... basically just doing covers in my living room, with Logic and a PRS guitar. If you had to go with one, which would you choose? And many thx from Spain !
Hi there, The best sounding, in my opinion is the Tascam, and they have a new version (the US2x2HR) of the one featured in this video coming out soon. The bee Audient iD14 mrkii looks good as well. They’d be my shortlist. 🙂
@@EdThorne hey man. I’ve been told the software for Tascam models can be pretty fiddly. Found many issues? For me I’m torn between Scarlett, Tascam and the SSL. Probably the SSL
Thanks for this! I watched this because I was torn between the Focusrite 2i2 and the Steinberg UR22C. I now have a few others to add to the list haha. Think I'm swaying towards the Steinberg UR22C because of the MIDI inputs and the direct monitoring switch. I don't entirely understand what difference the 32-bit would make but from what you're saying it sounds like it may just be ahead of the game so that it is still compatible once the software catches up? I think the phantom power switch on the back is a pro for me rather than a con. I accidentally flicked the phantom power switch on my vocal harmoniser pedal and it made such a horrible loud noise I thought I'd blown my speaker! haha.
The Steinberg is great for mobile recording on an iPad Pro or mobile (if you have a powered USB hub and camera adaptor kit). Check out the new Audient iD14mkii too or the EVO 4.
La steinberg da un sonido completamente natural no agrega agudos o brillos. Es más fácil trabajar sobre un audio neutro y equalizar después en la posproducción.
I have been producing some music and been to studio for recording own song, hope having my own AI helps me😅 but i dont have one 😄. Went through ur channel and found really good content and yeah i subbed it 😎
I just opened up my studio for booking at my current office space where I usually just make beats. I've experienced latency with my scarlett 2i2 3rd gen and some static/vnyl noise coming out on vocals. I am still on a budget as I am currently spending $ on bills and other products. Im not really focusing on sessions with bands where I need so many input connections. The Mic I'm currently using is a Warm wa87. Is there a Audio Interface you recommend to use for now to upgrade from my Scarlett 2i2 3rd gen if the Apollo Twin is out the picture?
Hi Luis, The static/vinyl noise could be preamp saturation if you have the input signal too hot. It's always worth checking the mic cable too. A noticeable upgrade on the Scarlett preamps and definitely converters is the Clarett. The pres sound great, arguably better than the Apollo's, as you can hear here: th-cam.com/video/IkuuxFvNB_g/w-d-xo.html And it's priced pretty much in between the Scarlett and the Apollo Twins.
So I have the presonus.... ehh. I have the behringer uphoria..... much better sounding preamps. But I was thinking trying the Scarlett or the audient id4. I’ve done so much research I’ve got myself twisted. Which do you prefer?
kyle whittaker Hi Kyle, It depends if you’re looking for a significant step up in audio quality or not. The Audient is good, the converters are worth spending the extra money on for better audio quality. Personally, out of this interfaces I preferred the sound of the Tascam. Have you considered the Focusrite Clarett?
Useful vid. I really REALLY don't get why so many of these, especially as they go up in price, don't include MIDI I/O, or why nobody seems to think that's more than a footnote. I guess nobody else uses a laptop, or maybe everybody else has unlimited ports. Me, I've got two USBs and one Thunderbolt/USB C. That's it. I need those ports, and it makes a big f'ing difference if I'm using one of them or two for my audio and MIDI interface with my DAW. It's a TOTAL deal-breaker, and I'm the only person who seems to think so. I do not get it.
@@TrueShayari Yes, it comes with Windows drivers. I use Mac so can’t comment about the PC software. The Tascam is great, best sounding in this bunch imo, I haven’t used the new Hd version.
Dear, your reviews on interfaces are best I ever found. Especially live comparison of sound quality is mind blowing. Further your English can be easily understood. Good job. Keep it up.
Hey bud, can u tell me which one should i buy. I want to make covers with electric guitar ,vocals and backing track but i want to do it with my phone which can record effects and multiple tracks(i have a laptop, but it will be a pain to carry it around in terrains). These are few of the choices that i have.:- audient evo 4 , roland rubix 22 , Steinberg ur22c , behringer 204 or 202 , motu m2, scarlett 2i2 3rd gen, presonus 24 or 26 c. Ssl2 is quite on expensive side so cant afford that..
Hi there Ashish, I'm not sure which of these enable recording onto your mobile. I know the Steinberg has iPad recording functionality. Sorry I can't be more specific.
@@EdThorne I just want to know if there are any other audio interfaces like Steinberg ur22c which has inbuilt dsp and can be used for live streaming on TH-cam or direct video recording with phone. For eg .. this video th-cam.com/video/zhGZEMCwuuQ/w-d-xo.html
They're both very similar. The direct monitoring is much better on the M-Audio though. You can hear the Focusrite and Soft Tube plugins that come free with the Scarlett in this video. We DI'd the electric and mic's the acoustic: th-cam.com/video/ZcXOoXdQ9Z8/w-d-xo.html
I'm super interested in the SSL+, but I'm forced to bus power the unit. Is there anything to be worried about with bus powered? Also considering i'm upgrading from a scarlett 6i6 I realize all these units are USB 2.0. Am i to understand that there isn't much need even for modern interfaces to use usb 3.0?
I didn't have any trouble with the unit being bus powered. The difference between USB numbers is the speed of data transfer and the amount of power they can transfer, the larger the number the significantly better. The faster the data transfer, the lower the latency. The direct monitoring on the SSL2 is very good so you wouldn't need to run through your DAW for input monitoring if you can handle recording with dry monitoring.
For me the NI Komplete , Steinberg UR22 and SSl 2..They all seem to have a more open and natural sound and I could hear more nuances in the performance.
💽 Track Mixing: edthorne.com/mixing
🎬 Can A DI Box REALLY Make A Difference? th-cam.com/video/HeE57eYXjF8/w-d-xo.html
🎬 Scarlett 4th Generation vs 3rd Gen: th-cam.com/video/_LDDzsxp1a0/w-d-xo.html
Could you rank those interfaces in Top 10 please, which one of them are having better performance when comparing to other interfaces in this list. Thank you
@@rickytanjun-hong1490 I don’t want to rank them for fear of offending people but I can tell you I think the following: BEST SOUND - Tascam; BEST VALUE FOR MONEY - Scarlett; BEST OVERALL - Audient. 🙂
Hey could you help me out? i got a question before i purchase anything
@@AlexE8030 Sure, ask away 🙂
@@EdThorne ok so I was planning on buying the 3rd gen Scarlett solo and using a AudioTechnica At2020 with a Beardynamic Dt770 pro 250ohm version and I was wondering if that would work and if there would be issues
He gave me life for my creation. He lit the Fuze now I am burning 🔥
Jim V Almost 😜
He gave me life for my creation, lit the fuse and now I’m burning
Hey dude, loved all the info you gave in this video. Clearly you are not sponsored by any of these companies and you say clearly what are the good and bad things of any of them. I am really into buying the Focusrite one, but I do have one question about the direct input monitor dial. Thanks man!
I brought a secondhand imac with Logic Pro installed. I have a very basic system. I would love any of the interfaces. From doing a lot of research on TH-cam and tutorial to help me with my music production. SSL seem to be right up there when it comes to quality, so i'm going with the SSL2.
great presentation.
Jason Wicks Thanks Jason. I like the Legacy 4K mode on this unit. Subtle but a nice colouring.
thought the Steinberg UR22c sounded nice especially with the acoustic guitar adding some nice upper mids, just looking at different options for sound cards/audio interfaces as I haven't got one yet, some great vids reviewing different options on this channel, keep up the good work!
Thank you Harry, I appreciate that 🙏 What are you thinking of getting?
Ed Thorne, I originally was thinking of getting the Apollo twin X like you as it has the bonus of coming with some great plugins like the LA-2A and others. Although with the dsp problem that you had and also with it being out of my price range when I checked, I probably won’t get it. Other than that I’ve heard some of the audient and focusrite products are good, and I’ll wait to see your verdict on the Scarlett vs Clarett. Otherwise I’m open to more suggestions and will be doing more research on entry audio interfaces
Excellent comparison video 👍👍👍 Thank you.
I was very happy to pick out the Tascam before you made a comment.
You’re welcome. Thanks for watching. Yeh the Tascam sounded great. I haven’t tried the new HD model.
Going with the SSL 2! great review Ed!
Awesome. Glad I could help you make the decision. Thanks for watching 🙂🙏
This is the most complete, informative and create review I have ever seen. Did you really really buy all these? Thanks so much!!
Thanks, Ed. Ha, yeh, this was back in the day before I realised that TH-camr’s can A) get sent stuff for free to review and B) get paid for their time to do so. I bought all of these on a credit card and sent them all back after the video for a refund 🤣
Congratulations on 1k man. I think the ADAT compatibility on the audient gives it an edge, it can grow with your setup instead of impeding it, plus buckets of headroom and nice clean preamps are never a bad thing.
The Steinberg does sound surprisingly good though!
Thanks Emily 🙏 Yes, the ADAT is useful. 👌
Under rated feature for sure.
ADAT compatibility makes this device something you're not gonna end up selling when you end up needing more inputs in the future.
Thanks for this!!Loved the logic file comparison format, easy to see and hear.
From a bass players perspective, really like the audient and the SSL with 4k. Only reason I prefer the Audient is the SSL2 only sounds as good with the 4k engaged whereas the Audeint that is it standard sound.
I’m glad you found the video useful 🙏 The SSL is lovely in L4K mode but I know you mean in comparison to the Audient, which is a very clear sounding interface.
Loving the content on this channel my dude, exactly the kind of in depth analysis of budget gear that we need and can't really get anywhere else
Sebastian Smith Thank You Sebastian. Glad you liked the video 🙏
I'm an incoming classical piano master's student looking to get into recording, so I've been diving into learning about all the necessary equipment. I'm really glad that I found your channel and this video in particular, as I'm an audio interface and a (better) pair of mics away from really getting off the ground! Thanks for doing ALL of these comparisons - my favorite among these might be the Scarlett 2i2 without Air, especially listening to the guitar samples. Looking forward to your future comparison and educational videos!
Thank you, Alex, I appreciate the support. I’m glad you found the video useful, there’s plenty more coming. Is there anything you’d specifically like to learn/see?
@@EdThorne Looking forward to future videos with Behringer and MOTU interfaces to round out the relatively budget interfaces! Also, I know this information is out there, but it'd be great to have some of this consolidated on one place: deeper explanation of specs and what they mean (e.g. different types of inputs), maybe comparisons of mics and explanations of miking patterns and techniques. And, I've yet to see a great, thorough blind listening test that compares several audio interfaces - I feel like this could provide some raw, unbiased thoughts on how an audio interface performs.
@@alexfangpiano Hi Alex, thank you for the content suggestions. I have made a note and will see what I can do. :-)
I'm glad you mentioned the issue with the gain setting on the Mackie. I have one such unit with the same problem. Most likely a design defect. BTW, I like your videos. Short, clear and to the point. And you obviously know what you're talking about.
Thank you, Felipe, I hope the videos are helpful 😊🙏
USED THE FOCUSRITE 2I2 FOR A LONG TIME, BEST EXPERIENCE! GREAT VIDEO!
Thanks Jesús. Glad you’re digging the Scarlett 🙏
This was extremely thorough which I appreciate! I've been doing nonstop research on different audio interfaces but actually getting to hear them in use is great! Really enjoyed the Focusrite in air mode also enjoyed the Steinberg can't put my finger on it but I feel it'd suit my voice well lol. Looking forward to the video on the Motu M4 it's another I'm curious about.
Hi, glad you found the video helpful. The Scarlett in AIR mode is nice. My fave was the Tascam. I’ve no-idea when I can get hold of a Motu, there’s none in the UK at the mo.
Ed Thorne yea with everything going on I doubt it will be soon, but I shall be here when you do!
@@EdThorne My Tascam US4x4 died after 3 years (its main board fried or something) and replacing it would cost me 200eur. I am afraid to buy another tascam even thou they have release a new HR series.
Been producing music using only my laptop and I am still looking for a budget interface ever since. I came across this video, what a wonderful shoot out. I think SSL's price is worth it after hearing its amazing quality. Thank you for this video. Keep safe!
Deeno You’re welcome, glad you found it useful 🙏
Hows it going these days?
Dude, you did a great comparison and explanations along with the sound that produced from each products, it helps me so much since i have plan to buy one of those products. Anyway, I'm pretty interested in Focusrite 2i2 but i wish to get free Steinberg UR22 from you 😅
Otniel H Tumbel 🤣👌 Thanks Otniel.
Dude this is a very detailed video. What a great video. ThX and for the info.
You are more than welcome. I hope it was useful 🙂🙏
Great video Ed. A really good overview. I'm pretty interested in that Steinberg with the mobile recording applications. Having kids who are being encouraged into music, recording, making videos and such, doing so on the iPad is so much more familiar to them than the laptop. Something like this would help make that step into music production without changing device (or at least keeping my machine free!)
Thanks Mike 🙏
Fantastic video mate! been liking the Audient a lot but the SSL seems an amazing interface! Great to have big obvious knob for level on the top panel too!
Hi Matteo, thanks for the kind words. 🙏
There were indeed only slight differences between these. For me with vocals, the standouts were the Steinberg and the Audient. The Steinberg had more clarity (not just additional brightness like the Focustrite with Air) and the Audient felt like it had more headroom and slightly richer low mids. It seemed to "breathe" more. I personally didn't like the Focusrite Air mode. I had a Scarlett 2i4 2nd Gen before and since then, an Audient iD4 then more recently the iD14 MKII. To me, the Audient preamps and converters sound significantly more transparent than the Scarlett 2i4 I had (much less difference here) and the preamps are way less noisy. Also as a guitar player, I never could get a really good tone out of amp sims with the Scarlett, the high impedance instrument input of both the iD4 and iD14 MKII solved that. Noticeably wider frequency range of the direct recorded signal, better preserved highs and more natural "feel".
The audient and ssl do sound really nice.
To be honest it’s impressive how far we’ve come in this regard. So cheap equipment with great sound.
SAPV I agree 🙂💪
My SSL 2 crapped out on me after a year of use ... it got increasingly more 'buzzy' and the second instrument channel doesn't work at all. They feel like gimmicky plastic pieces of junk to me ... but that's just been my experience. I may have gotten a lemon, but although they've been getting great reviews, beware of the SSL 2.
@@Fiveash-Art I've been hearing more and more bad stuff about the SSL interfaces... I would say, from my experience, that they feel definitively flimsy and cheap in your hands. It feels far from a premium product.
On the other hand, Audient has been killing it. I got myself an Evo 16, and damn, that's a pretty and great piece of hardware, mind-blown.
@@sapv I'm having some sort of grounding issue and I think it may be possible it was the M1 Mac mini not having a proper ground plug. I can't believe Apple is still making these things like this. I bought a 'ground loop isolator' by some company online. I'm going to see if that helps the issue. I may have jumped the gun blaming the SSL 2 ... it seemed great when I first started with it. ... but yeah, it does seem kind of cheaply made. If the issue continues I'm thinking of buying the focus rite Clarett ...
I recently got a Tascam US 16 08 for less than 300 pounds and it was an absolute game changer. With 10 input preamps and really transparent signal processing I'm able to do so much more.
More or less same features and quality in this particular price range. M-AUDIO and N.I. look gorgeous though, besides the great sound quality! Totally loved the Steinbergs' sound!
Audient simply rocks .. And close competition was SSL and Focusrite for vocals
Guitar sounded clear with audient ..
So for me audient wins
It’s a good unit. I’ll be doing a Two minute Tech review Tuesday video on it soon 😀
@@EdThorne and I just bought evo 4 few hours back.. And i am amazed by the quality.. And especially how quiet the device is..
@@EdThorne Great video, thanks! Subscribed! Have you tried the EVO4 out yet? Would love to hear your take! (Pun intended)
gidsorilla I haven’t tried the Evo but I keep hearing about it. I’ll see what I can do about an Evo4/RME review.
TASCAM US 2×2 THE BEST
Oh well I've missed the competition, but still liked the video, very informative as I was looking to uograde from my presonus audiobox 96 usb to the focusrite, but I now have a few more options, maybe looking at getting an interface with more inputs, but this has made me look at other brands. Brill video. If you've had a chance to test the beringer can you let me know? Cheers
Mav T Thanks Mat. Glad you found it useful. Yeh there’s plenty of options these days. My favourite was the Tascam. I’ll see about the Behringer when I can get hold of one.
Thanks for audio examples!
Thank you very much that your comparison on that few of audio interface. If very great to share out to let more people know about it and glad i came across with your channel!!!!
You’re welcome. Thank you for watching, I’m glad it was useful 😀🙏
Simply fantastic comparsion! Thank you. Shure i'm subscribe. Thanks!
Thanks, Adriano. Glad it was useful 🙂
So far have not been able to decide which interface is best suited for my needs. Leaning towards possibly a Steinberg, Tascam, or Roland. This video helped a lot!
Glad you found it useful 🙏 I think the Tascam sounds best but the Steinberg has the best features with the onboard DSP and iPad connectivity etc
For all freq : Audient, Steinberg, Komplete, Presonus, SSL, focusrite, Roland,Tascam, Mackie, M-audio.
Is that your order of preference?
very informative! was inclined to the Native Instruments Komplete Audio 2 but now not so much. thank you
sa4aadpuppies I’m glad you found it useful, thanks for watching. Yeh, I don’t think the KA2 stands up next to the others, especially the Tascam which sounds great
I read other reviews about how better the mic preamps are on the SSL2 in this price range. I heard the obvious difference in this video when you demonstrated the vocal. It really jumped out as the most natural sound compared to the others.
Nice video and comparison!! That SSL2 definitely makes me drool!!
Thank you 🙏 Yeh, it’s a nice interface. Legacy 4K Mode is lovely.
Thanks for all your videos man! They are helping me a lot.
Aspearits You’re more than welcome. I’m glad they’re useful, and thanks for watching 🙂
I'm really digging the SSL
I like it with Legacy 4K Mode engaged
Excellent presentation. Very complete and satisfactory tests. What is the latency like on all these.
Thank you Paul. No latency that I could distinguish. The direct monitoring basically removes this problem.
Enjoyed this and a couple of other of your vids on the subject and hit the subscribe button as I believe your style of presentation and coverage deserve more subbers imo! Still struggling to decide though haha Currently don't have an interface as I've only got some M-Audio AV32s and Sennheiser HD25s for my home studio. Planning to upgrade to some KRKs or maybe Yamahas (model to be decided) and some Beyerdynamic 770pros with their higher impedance. Would prefer an audio interface with space for two sets of monitor inputs over other inter-connectivity as my instruments are virtual and my neighbours have banned me from singing too 😂
Good idea to let us hear the difference between them all plus show the wavetable as the aforementioned monitors make it difficult to hear the difference (hence the urgent upgrade!!) Thansk for the great reviews man
Thanks for the subscribe 🙂 The Antelope ZenGo offer two headphone outputs with independently controllable and mixable sends. Most other, lower cost interfaces with two HP outs send the same mix out of both.
@@EdThorne Thanks for that. As far as the headphone outputs are concerned, I've been using Sennheiser HD25s for a year but plan to get some beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro so wanted an easy way to compare the two in mixdown :)
Great job man, thanks for sharing this videos. Really liked the steinberg sound and features. Hope I win... Scarlett on the air mode sounds great.
Thanks Rafael. You’re in the draw 😀🙏
Really surprised with the release Solid State Logic SSL2. Never expect them to join the "budget home studio" audio interface game.
Video coming later today in more detail about this
Excellent presentation. Very complete and satisfactory tests. Although they all sound pretty good I have to agree with you that the Tascam sounds slightly better than those closest to it. The sound is so tight, so compressed.
David Fabien Thanks David 🙏
Nice video again mate and definitely between those the SSL2
Morchelle Music Thanks Morchelle🙏Great name btw 👌
I'm just glad I came across with your channel! Sincere thanks!
You’re welcome, and thank you 🙏
Very interesting video. I had the Audient iD14 for a while. After seeing your video I like what you were saying about the Tascam and the Steinberg.
Thanks 🙏 I was pleasantly surprised with the Tascam and the Steinberg has some great ideas.
@@EdThorne Keep up the great work with your videos. They are packed full of info for a budding home player trying to make himself sound a bit better. (I am of course talking about myself). Your videos are very helpful when trying to make decisions.
Great video! Goes to show how technology is advancing. I have an old 1st gen 2i2 and this video helped me decide on an upgrade.
That’s great. Which one are you going for? The Clarett is a good upgrade from the Scarlett, I have a video on that coming soon.
Ed Thorne Actually going for the SSL. I really like the sound, especially with the 4K mode.
Thanks, Ed, this was quite helpful. How would you say about the sound quality of Tascan compared to UA Volt 1/2 and also Audient 4/14 MkII?
It’s been over two years since I’ve used the Tascam but I’d from memory I’d say it has cleaner preamps. The Volts do sound good though. Defo get the 76 version with the compressor.
Great video, I got the 2i2 recently but I've had nothing but problems with the drivers not working on Win10.
Thanks for showing me there are so many other options!
Thanks Tim, and you’re welcome. I’m hearing a lot of people complain about Windows 10 with different interfaces
@@EdThorne I might look at getting the M-Audio, looks fantastic!
@@timraybouldguitar Get the Audient
A MILLION thanks - My main concerns are noise and having a little extra Mike gain for my stage quality dynamic Mics. I gave my kid my Scarlett 2i2, and I’m thinking of stepping up to a 4x4. Q: at that point, our multi track mixers in the same price range for comparable low noise and clean signal? (meaning I wouldn’t consider something like a Behringer if you paid me!)
I got the SSL2+ And love it thank you
That’s great 🙂🤘
The Tascam is very, very good! Thanks for the test!!
It sounded the best in this comparison in my opinion! Be sure to check out the new Volt audio interface too: th-cam.com/video/JW1na7KXBP4/w-d-xo.html
So Nice. I’m very glad you did all this comparison. You deserve our applaud and subscription😊🙏 And can you please tell me which audio interface go best with Shure SM7B? I don’t want to use cloud-lifter or booster. Let me know And Thank You again.
BeBe You’re welcome and thank you for the support. I would suggest the Audient or SSL because they have 66/62dB input gain respectively.
Ed Thorne what about M audio Air 192 with Rode Procaster?
@@OllieJgames I haven't used that mic but it seems to be a popular and cheaper alternative to the Shure SM7b. Most Rode stuff is decent :-)
Ed Thorne yeah, I agree haha. Do you think it needs cloudlifter? I watched Kruse video on M audio interface with SM7b, it has ground noise (but the quietest). He said cloudlifter makes it worse haha. Just wondering your opinion and usage maybe with SM7b
OllieJ Games It depends on your interface. Most interfaces under $200 only have an input gain of around 55dB, which is enough if you’re a loud singer but the last 10% of the gain structure on these devices introduces noise so you can’t use all 55dB. So I’d suggest a cloud lifter then. Or, combine your interface and cloud lifter money and get an SSL/Audient/Apollo which have loads of clean gain.
direct audio comparisons: exactly what I was looking for. Thanks. However: listening to the examples on youtube via my iMac and Bose active external PC speakers I must say: I am as confused as I was before.
gregorheinrich Yeh there’s very little difference between them. The only one that really stand out for me was the Tascam, and maybe the SSL with 4K Mode.
Thanks for the info and examples. Helped out with my decision.
You're welcome, I'm glad it helped. What did yo
u decide to get?
Dude, this is awesome. Very helpful and informative!
Thanks Simon 😊
My favourites in order:
Audient, ssl, m audio, focusrite air mode.
Nice shootout ;)
Nice. Thanks for watching 🙏
Thank a lot for all the time you put into this. You help me a lot building my Homestudio and i can't thank you enough.
The interface i prefere even if there's no big difference like you said would be the Ssl m, presonus and focusrite.
I wonder, which is your fav one?
Exalt Studio You’re welcome, I’m glad you found it useful. I liked the Tascam the best, but legacy 4K on the SSL is nice and the Scarlett comes with loads of great stuff. The Steinberg is promising too with the DSP processing.
I watched this video for at least 300 times. It is an amazing video.
😊 Thank you! I appreciate the support! Did you decide on an interface?
@@EdThorne Would decide in the coming 2-3 months. Now my new house including studio setup is under construction. Which interface you suggest for best vocals. Should I go with iD 14 MKII+ ASP 880 Pream.
@@HarvinderSingh-yy8th That’s great news about the studio! Do you need ten inputs for just vocals? I’d suggest a designated single channel preamp, unless you’re recording drums too(?)
Hey Ed, what do you think of the Audient ID 22 vs the 14 here.
I see they have similar or the same converters but I was looking into getting the SSL 2 and just getting rid of my Audient ID22 since I've had it since 2016.
Not really sure if it's an upgrade or downgrade really. Just wanted to know your opinion on sound. They all sound good to my ears.
Thanks!
The iD22 has some great features (alt monitor outs, insert send/returns if you have outboard gear), and the assignable F buttons. It seems a more functional desktop controller than the iD14, more akin to the Apollo. Sound wise, personally, I'd stay with the Audient over the SSL. The SSL isn't fitted with the famous E-Channel strip preamps that SSL are famous for. They definitely play on the fact that people make that assumption.
Great Video. I use Logic pro, When recording, can you send as an example, logic reverb to the vocals for monitoring, when using the ID mix soft wear
No. The iD software basically allows you to re-route your inputs. You can monitor through a reverb plugin on a channel strip in Logic but this will introduce latency.
For monitor return processing, the Antelope ZenGo and UA Apollo’s are the best devices for this (also a lot more expensive due to the DSP processing required to enable effect monitoring with sub 2ms latency)
Just found out your channel. Its amazing! Can you help me decide between Clarett 2preamps and SSl2+ ? Thank you very much in advance ! :)
Thank you 😊🙏 Personally I think the Clarett has the better sounding preamps and it is ADAT expandable if you want to add more inputs to your set up later. In terms of monitoring flexibility though, the (new) Audient iD14mkii is my favourite interface in this price range. Full review of that here: th-cam.com/video/TCW9HVfG03M/w-d-xo.html
Thank you very much for the video. Very dynamic and informative. I'm hesitating between buying a tascam us 4x4HR and a Roland Rubix 44. It's for recording acoustic instruments and playing live with Ableton. Could you tell me which one would you choose? Thank you!
I’d suggest the new UA Volt interfaces 👌
Thank you! Its looks amazing, but I need 4 inputs on the stage and I can't find it on the UA Volt
@@libremocion9273 Volt 476👌
@@EdThorne Thanks again. I really apreciate the Quick answer. Its Sounds amazing, but its too expensive for me. That is the reason to go for the rubix, the behringer or the Tascam
@@libremocion9273 The Tascam sounds really good! The knobs are very small and fiddly though (very minor detail).
I honestly couldn’t hear any differences between them besides the last one with the volume issues. Yea, I’ll stick with my Mk2. Thank you!
Hi Ed, Great comparison session. Whilst I'm torn between the Focusrite & the Tascam, my choice has been made more complex by the discontinuation of the Tascam model tested, in favour of the higher spec'd US2x2HR model. Can you please give me any thoughts on how I should make my choice & any early view/rumours on the upgraded Tascam 2x2HR?
(From your video, my initial focus areas were the direct monitoring/headphone output & the supplied software bundles.)
Thanks in anticipation...
Hi There, thanks. The HR version brings the product in line with other interfaces with 192kHz converters. I don’t think you’d hear a difference between the 96k on the US model and this but it’s a sensible move from Tascam. In terms of direct monitoring, IMHO the Scarlett is pretty poor. The best interfaces in this video for DM are the Audient, SSL and M-Audio. It might be worth looking at the new iD14 mrkii. Regarding the software, this is where the Scarlett does well but almost all of these interfaces come with a free DAW of some kind.
@@EdThorne Hi, I'm from Brazil and I'm in doubt between the Tascam 4x4hr and Scarlett 8i6 audio interfaces. can you give me an opinion?
Thanks for the comparisons! Not sure I heard a clear winner, most sound similar.
You’re welcome. For me it’s the Tascam but the direct monitoring DSP processing on the Steinberg makes it an interesting choice.
@@EdThorne yea, hoping to win your Steinberg give a way so I can check it out! 😎
ec461o Haha. You’re in the draw 😀
Great video with a lot of information man thank you! If you had to pick a beginner set as a gift for a vocal teacher singer/songwriter who also happens to be your girlfriend who’s just starting out. Which would you go with ? Asking for a friend......
Thank you and GREAT question. I would highly recommend the Scarlett Studio Pack. It has everything she needs 🙂
th-cam.com/video/YCEgbEtqnc4/w-d-xo.html
Found out what the stereo monitoring mode is. It treats Inputs ch1 as left and ch2 as right. Whereas mono mode sums them together and send them to both your ears.
I like the air mode too!
Philip Hatch Aaaaah right, that kind of makes sense. The device still needs a mic input-DAW balance dial though. Thanks for the update 😀
@@EdThorne Well I wondered about that. When I've used them before I've ways had wound all the way one way or the other to be fair... isn't their gonna be latency issues anyway mixing life in with DAW reply... if ur recording the live in? Would it be better to just open the input for monitoring in the DAW and just listen to yourself through the DAW??
I really like the warm sound from the Komplete Audio 2 & M-Audio AIR 192|6. What do you think would be better with a Rode podmic setup ?
Curious for you to review the MOTU. Like the steinberg for ipad recording
Apparently there won’t be any in the UK until August... (according to one of the big shops here)
Thank you for playing the same bit for all the interfaces. I hate when an entire verse of a song is played through multiple units for comparison with switching between units mid verse. I can't compare quality if I'm also comparing the different parts of the song at the same time.
Thanks for the review, everything was clear and reasonable.
You’re welcome, thanks for watching 🙂
Fast forward to March 2021. Just got an AUDIENT EVO 8. The first one was defective, with no audible Mic input heard on the headphones. Got a replacement from Sweetwater here in the USA. I really like the EVO 8! The FOUR COMBO inputs are so versatile. I can even take a cell phone audio, using a 1/8 to split 1/4 cable, and get a great signal. Whereas with USB interfaces like the MOTU M4, or Scarlett 4i4, that won't work using the 1/4" jacks in the back of the units. They are LINE LEVEL inputs, can only accept signals from a Mixer line out or such, which are very different in voltages and resistance as compared to, say the 1/4" jacks of a mixer which are meant for cell phones, tablets or MP3 players. Maybe the USB power from a laptop is just not adequate for that purpose. Anyone know?
I don’t quite understand the question. Please could you re-phrase?
the tascam and the ssl 2 had very clear upper end over the other ones, the mackie was all over the place. the steinberg seemed to even out the dynamics on its own.
steve burke I agree 👌 Thanks for watching
The tescam I have at the studio struggles like hell... no matter what frame rate I set it to
@@Tobz.X Audio interfaces don't have frame rates, that's video. If you are recording for video, the best sample rate for the interface will be 48kHz or 96kHz (then down-sample to 48kHz).
Great review - which interface would you go for if you want to drive high impedance 'phones (am looking at DT770 either 80 or 250 ohms) as i am unable to produce on monitors currently.
Thank you. I would go for the Audient. This has a very powerful headphone amp.
@@EdThorne great thank you Ed.
Thanks for showcasing these!
KevinMitchellGuitar You’re welcome. Thanks for watching 😀
Which interface do you suggest for mixing? I'm looking for an interface that does not heat up when it is on for long periods of time. Which of these including the new UAD Volt would have better headphone/monitor output sound for mixing. I have an Apollo USB I use for recording but it does heat up when I keep it on for a while, I do not want to lose it as the sound is great.
Apollos get hot in general. If it works, there’s no problem. Volt isn’t better than the Apollo Solo.
Very informative vid. How is the headphone volume on the Focusrite 2i2?
Thanks for watching. The headphone out on the Scarlett isn’t the loudest, I struggled to get a good balance/level with the direct monitoring feature. I go into more detail in the Studio Pack review here: th-cam.com/video/YCEgbEtqnc4/w-d-xo.html
Ed Thorne Awesome! Thanks for the insight.
Thank you so much Ed for the detailed explanation. I am new to recording. I do vocals and play the Guitar. Could you kindly help me decide between the M Audio and the SSL2? Focusrite is the most obvious one to fall for for its popularity n the Air feature. However I also liked the looks of the Volume Control of the M-Audio and the SSL2 and as you said there is not much vast difference in these entry level Sound Cards. Would love to hear from you on your final recommendation to help me decide. Was also considering M Audio 192/6 and SSL 2+ if M-Audio n SSL are good. Also are these durable enough as compared to the Focusrite knowing these are new products. Many users did face problem with M-Audio as per reviews. However since this is called the M-Audio Air. Thank you so much in advance. Stay blessed. :)
AmlanAstaLaVista Thanks Amlan, I’m glad you found the video useful. Personally, I think the SSL sounds slightly better, it has a higher input gain, and a cleaner signal towards the top end of the input gain. The headphone output is louder and cleaner too than the M-Audio. That said, the direct monitoring on the M-Audio is good, it’s easy to get a good headphone mix with it. The SSL is also fine though. Legacy 4K Mode on the SSL is lovely. The SSL is more expensive though so it’s a toss up. Personally, I think the Tascam sounds the best out of all the interfaces in the video.
@@EdThorne: Thank you so much for the clarity. Shall go with SSL in that case.
If I'm wanting to upgrade from my Scarlet 18i8 with a max budget of $1000 and I need 2 mic inputs and 2 inputs for something like an AxeFX or Helix, is the Audient ID44, Arturia AudioFuse and Clarette+ 4 the only 3 real options?
There's a lot of features & opinions for each product. It would be great to see a table of this info or link to one on your website. It would be interesting with a high quality audio source playing the same demo into the interfaces to compare the audio for each (attempt to normalize preamp gain, double check by normalize wave files after recording, check noise floor & dynamic range). How much do we need to spend to get great preamp, great headphone mix/output, great everything (if it exists)?
Check out @juliankraus’s channel for these kind of statistics. He’s the man for scientific measurements.
Отличное видео! Я не разбираюсь в записи гитары и ничего не могу сказать по поводу звучания. Но в записи вокала для меня однозначно выиграл Tascam. Хуже всех на мой взгляд оказался Mackie. У Focusrite и Steinberg задрат верх, как мне показалось.
Спасибо за вашу работу!
Что вы можете сказать подробнее про M-Audio?
HI Ed ... thinking about substituting my old Apogee Jam with a newer Audio Interface from your list... basically just doing covers in my living room, with Logic and a PRS guitar. If you had to go with one, which would you choose? And many thx from Spain !
Hi there, The best sounding, in my opinion is the Tascam, and they have a new version (the US2x2HR) of the one featured in this video coming out soon. The bee Audient iD14 mrkii looks good as well. They’d be my shortlist. 🙂
@@EdThorne Thank you so much for answering (and so quickly). !!
@@EdThorne hey man. I’ve been told the software for Tascam models can be pretty fiddly. Found many issues?
For me I’m torn between Scarlett, Tascam and the SSL. Probably the SSL
Thanks for this! I watched this because I was torn between the Focusrite 2i2 and the Steinberg UR22C. I now have a few others to add to the list haha. Think I'm swaying towards the Steinberg UR22C because of the MIDI inputs and the direct monitoring switch. I don't entirely understand what difference the 32-bit would make but from what you're saying it sounds like it may just be ahead of the game so that it is still compatible once the software catches up? I think the phantom power switch on the back is a pro for me rather than a con. I accidentally flicked the phantom power switch on my vocal harmoniser pedal and it made such a horrible loud noise I thought I'd blown my speaker! haha.
The Steinberg is great for mobile recording on an iPad Pro or mobile (if you have a powered USB hub and camera adaptor kit). Check out the new Audient iD14mkii too or the EVO 4.
32, bits doesn't mean that sound will be pleasing under audible range.
La steinberg da un sonido completamente natural no agrega agudos o brillos.
Es más fácil trabajar sobre un audio neutro y equalizar después en la posproducción.
I have been producing some music and been to studio for recording own song, hope having my own AI helps me😅 but i dont have one 😄. Went through ur channel and found really good content and yeah i subbed it 😎
Xeroth Winkz Beats Thanks for the support 🙏
I just opened up my studio for booking at my current office space where I usually just make beats. I've experienced latency with my scarlett 2i2 3rd gen and some static/vnyl noise coming out on vocals. I am still on a budget as I am currently spending $ on bills and other products. Im not really focusing on sessions with bands where I need so many input connections. The Mic I'm currently using is a Warm wa87. Is there a Audio Interface you recommend to use for now to upgrade from my Scarlett 2i2 3rd gen if the Apollo Twin is out the picture?
Hi Luis,
The static/vinyl noise could be preamp saturation if you have the input signal too hot. It's always worth checking the mic cable too. A noticeable upgrade on the Scarlett preamps and definitely converters is the Clarett. The pres sound great, arguably better than the Apollo's, as you can hear here: th-cam.com/video/IkuuxFvNB_g/w-d-xo.html And it's priced pretty much in between the Scarlett and the Apollo Twins.
So I have the presonus.... ehh. I have the behringer uphoria..... much better sounding preamps. But I was thinking trying the Scarlett or the audient id4. I’ve done so much research I’ve got myself twisted. Which do you prefer?
kyle whittaker Hi Kyle, It depends if you’re looking for a significant step up in audio quality or not. The Audient is good, the converters are worth spending the extra money on for better audio quality. Personally, out of this interfaces I preferred the sound of the Tascam. Have you considered the Focusrite Clarett?
Useful vid. I really REALLY don't get why so many of these, especially as they go up in price, don't include MIDI I/O, or why nobody seems to think that's more than a footnote. I guess nobody else uses a laptop, or maybe everybody else has unlimited ports. Me, I've got two USBs and one Thunderbolt/USB C. That's it. I need those ports, and it makes a big f'ing difference if I'm using one of them or two for my audio and MIDI interface with my DAW. It's a TOTAL deal-breaker, and I'm the only person who seems to think so. I do not get it.
How could you miss out on the MOTU M2? That's the best of them all!
I physically couldn’t get hold of one in the UK during the first lockdown.
@@EdThorne haha you're off the hook then
@@jobbo89 Phew 😜 Haha
Which is better Steinberg or Mackie ? I want for Voice recording
Personally I’d go for the Audient iD14mkii: th-cam.com/video/TCW9HVfG03M/w-d-xo.html
@@EdThorne Audient id14 will be work on Windows computer ?
Any problem or Driver issue ?
What do you think about tascam 2×2 ?
@@TrueShayari Yes, it comes with Windows drivers. I use Mac so can’t comment about the PC software. The Tascam is great, best sounding in this bunch imo, I haven’t used the new Hd version.
@@EdThorne Thanks Bro
For someone doing rap music with a really deep voice. What would you recommend ?
I still use my Roland Quad capture card, it's been an awesome card!
Paul Brown Roland stuff is built to last. It will outlive all of us 🙂🤘
Dear, your reviews on interfaces are best I ever found. Especially live comparison of sound quality is mind blowing. Further your English can be easily understood. Good job. Keep it up.
Ah, bless you, thank you. I’m glad they’re useful 🙂🙏
M-Audio Air 192|4 or Steinberg UR22C ? Thank you for the Help
Nice work mate. Nearly at the 1k mark
Thanks Tim. Yeh very close 🤭😬
Hey bud, can u tell me which one should i buy. I want to make covers with electric guitar ,vocals and backing track but i want to do it with my phone which can record effects and multiple tracks(i have a laptop, but it will be a pain to carry it around in terrains). These are few of the choices that i have.:- audient evo 4 , roland rubix 22 , Steinberg ur22c , behringer 204 or 202 , motu m2, scarlett 2i2 3rd gen, presonus 24 or 26 c. Ssl2 is quite on expensive side so cant afford that..
Hi there Ashish, I'm not sure which of these enable recording onto your mobile. I know the Steinberg has iPad recording functionality. Sorry I can't be more specific.
@@EdThorne
I just want to know if there are any other audio interfaces like Steinberg ur22c which has inbuilt dsp and can be used for live streaming on TH-cam or direct video recording with phone.
For eg .. this video th-cam.com/video/zhGZEMCwuuQ/w-d-xo.html
Hi! I have a question. Between the M-audio and the scarlett, which one is better for recording electric guitar and nylon string guitar?
They're both very similar. The direct monitoring is much better on the M-Audio though. You can hear the Focusrite and Soft Tube plugins that come free with the Scarlett in this video. We DI'd the electric and mic's the acoustic: th-cam.com/video/ZcXOoXdQ9Z8/w-d-xo.html
I'm super interested in the SSL+, but I'm forced to bus power the unit. Is there anything to be worried about with bus powered? Also considering i'm upgrading from a scarlett 6i6 I realize all these units are USB 2.0. Am i to understand that there isn't much need even for modern interfaces to use usb 3.0?
I didn't have any trouble with the unit being bus powered. The difference between USB numbers is the speed of data transfer and the amount of power they can transfer, the larger the number the significantly better. The faster the data transfer, the lower the latency. The direct monitoring on the SSL2 is very good so you wouldn't need to run through your DAW for input monitoring if you can handle recording with dry monitoring.
For me the NI Komplete , Steinberg UR22 and SSl 2..They all seem to have a more open and natural sound and I could hear more nuances in the performance.
SSL 2 is better then Steinberg or Focusrite for Shure SM7B ?
The Gen 4 Scarlett has 68dB of gain - plenty for an SM7b before preamp noise. The SSL is good too.