Took me 19 years to accept Islam!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 72

  • @Junaid-mw4hy
    @Junaid-mw4hy 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Let’s just Call him Ben.!
    We don’t want to overwhelm him.

  • @zax1972
    @zax1972 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +26

    I was born in the UK to muslim immigrant parents, I love all reverts to Islam especially British ones as the British have many noble traits and Islam would lift them higher. This was mind blowing, the brother just exudes Eemaan, may Allaah bless him and grant him every success in this world and the next, Aameen.

    • @benbevan8514
      @benbevan8514 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      JazakAllah Khair Brother

    • @tamirudi8128
      @tamirudi8128 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Aamiin

  • @SuhrabSekandari
    @SuhrabSekandari 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

    I am a new Subscriber from San Francisco California ❤ alhamdulila for Islam

  • @LADHA-z1l
    @LADHA-z1l 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    What a memory, amazing brother.

    • @benbevan8514
      @benbevan8514 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      JazakAllah Khair brother

  • @SISOMud
    @SISOMud 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    Alhamdulillah🤲🤲🤲🤲☝💝💖💝

  • @mamoormomozai784
    @mamoormomozai784 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    Mashalluh Alhamdu Lellah

  • @ramtilaakchintu8863
    @ramtilaakchintu8863 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +14

    Allah make it easy for Br Ben and His mother to follow Islam and fill their life with Barakah. Bless you brother and wish you all the best.

    • @benbevan8514
      @benbevan8514 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      JazakAllah Khair brother

    • @Finalmessageislam
      @Finalmessageislam  8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Ameen

    • @mh4841
      @mh4841 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@Finalmessageislam Assallamu Allaykum is this the channel for the podcast. It wasn't made clear as sometimes other channels repost videos.

  • @mokbolkhan91
    @mokbolkhan91 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Mashallah 🥰

  • @WepGrade
    @WepGrade 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    This is beautiful jzk for the conversation

  • @undaulun
    @undaulun 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Masyaallah, May Allah always give you ease in life and jannah for you later, amen

  • @mostdope4781
    @mostdope4781 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Allahuma Baarik Allah found him lost and guided him. May Allah Keep all is Muslims steadfast On The Straight Path and reunite all of us with the prophets in Jannah Tul Firdows. Welcome to Islam brother I see the Noor (light) on your face

  • @dhdowlad
    @dhdowlad 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It's nice to see Native English convert. It's time you guys stand on two feet and support each other because no one else understands the difficulties you face other than you.

  • @muhammadfitrullah
    @muhammadfitrullah 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Masha Allah...Laa quwwata illaa billah....Salam from Indonesia

  • @facts.explained.
    @facts.explained. 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    May Allah Almighty bless you both and protect you, Ameen

  • @SHAKILAHMED-c4c
    @SHAKILAHMED-c4c 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Mashallah

  • @naimajama2668
    @naimajama2668 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Ma’shaa Allah

  • @RangerTwo
    @RangerTwo วันที่ผ่านมา

    Mashallah. May Allah make it easy.

  • @KasishAgarwal90
    @KasishAgarwal90 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    MAY ALLAH BLESS AND MORE GUIDE THIS BROTHER AMEEN

  • @antonhassan
    @antonhassan 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Lots of baroqah to both of you, brothers. 🎉

  • @ahmadabdullah5610
    @ahmadabdullah5610 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Alhamdulilah

  • @TRSega
    @TRSega 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    MashaAllah ❤

  • @ahmedalshalchi
    @ahmedalshalchi 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +11

    ma shaa Allah ... May Allah bless both brothers and fix them on the straight path ...

  • @LADHA-z1l
    @LADHA-z1l 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Some good questions, flowing in there,my dear.

  • @axmedyare2404
    @axmedyare2404 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    AlhamduliLLAH

  • @JimySlow-wq9bw
    @JimySlow-wq9bw 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Terima kasih-thank you for made n share this video salam lots ❤ for you both from Jkrta

  • @MYWRoso
    @MYWRoso 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Alhamdulillah..
    Islam rahmatan lil'alamiin..
    Salam from Jakarta, 🇮🇩

  • @AdamTheVideoEditor
    @AdamTheVideoEditor 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Loves you from Malaysia...

  • @RR-tg8xr
    @RR-tg8xr 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Alhamdulillah….. welcome to the true religion brother.

  • @danielahmed8162
    @danielahmed8162 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

    AL hamdulillah

  • @shant2464
    @shant2464 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Masha'Allah Everyone who converts, say they found peace, purpose and guidance since accepting to worship the one God, ALLAH.

  • @OppoOppo-jr5fl
    @OppoOppo-jr5fl 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +9

    Loves you from Malaysia...🇲🇾

  • @khaziabdulsubhan1685
    @khaziabdulsubhan1685 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    ❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @amjadhussain5024
    @amjadhussain5024 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Great video msshallah 😊👍☝️

  • @Shabs2456
    @Shabs2456 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Islam is the only religion that makes intellectual sense. It has answers to all of humanity’s issues, that’s why more and more people are embracing Islam. There is no compulsion in religion. Read the Quran translation for yourself.

  • @LADHA-z1l
    @LADHA-z1l 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Double reward

  • @muhammadwaqar5407
    @muhammadwaqar5407 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    May Allah protect your imaan till u enter jannah

  • @eddie2562
    @eddie2562 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Assalamu'alaikum brothers and sisters. I am from Indonesia. I stumbled across this channel and mashaa Allah this channel reminds me of the time I spent in England in 2012. I met so many white reverts back then. Alhamdulillah Islam is growing a lot faster than before.

  • @almurabitun
    @almurabitun 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    As an Asian guy from UK I have to say more white people who convert to Islam need to marry each other and showcase white Muslim families to fellow white non-Muslims so they can see you can still be English, keep your English culture yet still be Muslim.

  • @Falesteen-fm5wr
    @Falesteen-fm5wr 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Ma’Sha’Allah Ben you have been an inspiration to us born Muslims reminding us that we must always put Islam before everything. We sometimes forget the beauty of our perfect faith. Alhumdulilah to Islam, so happy to hear your mum took her Shahada.

  • @cafeespresso99
    @cafeespresso99 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    What a diamond geezer!!!! Love this brother for the sake of Allah.

  • @funnyhari1232
    @funnyhari1232 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Salam from Indonesia bro. May allah give you istiqamah in iman and islam until death . Ameen ya allah ya robbal alameen

  • @ProTr.
    @ProTr. วันที่ผ่านมา

    Don't miss the surprising update in the end.🎉

  • @khaziabdulsubhan1685
    @khaziabdulsubhan1685 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    How is it possible that Islam will reach every home?

    • @Shabs2456
      @Shabs2456 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Through reverts

  • @davincisocrates
    @davincisocrates 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    ❤️Narrated Abu Huraira:
    I heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) saying, Verily Allah created Mercy. The day He created it, He made it into one hundred parts. He withheld with Him ninety-nine parts, and sent its one part to all His creatures. Had the non-believer known of all the Mercy which is in the Hands of Allah, he would not lose hope of entering Paradise, and had the believer known of all the punishment which is present with Allah, he would not consider himself safe from the Hell-Fire."❤️🇵🇸🤲🏼

  • @M10FUN
    @M10FUN 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Allah is the best planner

  • @arakibhosen434
    @arakibhosen434 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    ALHAMDULILLAH ❤️ love from Bangladesh 🇧🇩 keep going brothers with right intentions ❤️ JAJAKALLA KHIRAN ❤️🙂❤️

  • @travellerme2401
    @travellerme2401 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Parents, family, and _Silat Arrahim_ (familial bonds), are extremely important in islam.

  • @BagjaBhakt1_2
    @BagjaBhakt1_2 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    May Allah gather us in Jannah with Prophet SAW…aameen

  • @MusaGuy24
    @MusaGuy24 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Dagenham lad. oi oi.
    Alhamdulliah

  • @LADHA-z1l
    @LADHA-z1l 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    So simple.

  • @mznxbcv12345
    @mznxbcv12345 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Surah Al-Imran Aya 49, of the Quran states that jesus was sent to the israelites, although written over 1,400 years ago in the 19th century (same century bible was only transtalted into Arabic in as well) they came to the same conclusion, He never used or heard the words Christian or Christianity or any equivalent of either.
    Paul had neither met nor seen Jesus, his relation to the twelve apostles was one of decided independence and even of opposition. He acknowledged no subordination to them. He addressed no doctrinal epistle to them or their churches, and received none from them. He made no reports to them. He did not correspond with them regularly. They never invited him to preach to their congregations and he never invited them to address his converts. He declared that he did not owe his conversion, his baptism, or his doctrine to the twelve, and that he never spent any long time in Jerusalem or in Judea as a Christian missionary. He claimed to be an apostle by a secret divine commission, but the twelve never admitted the validity of his claim. They never gave him the title of apostle; they never said anything indicative of willingness to admit him into their councils. Vacancies occurred in their number, but they never chose him to a vacant place, rather we have statements of Peter with regards to Paul which show nothing but animosity:
    "And if our Jesus appeared to you also and became known in a vision and met you as angry with an enemy [recall: Paul had his vision while still persecuting the Christians: Acts 9], yet he has spoken only through visions and dreams or through external revelations. But can anyone be made competent to teach through a vision? And if your opinion is that that is possible, why then did our teacher spend a whole year with us who were awake? How can we believe you even if he has appeared to you?… But if you were visited by him for the space of an hour and were instructed by him and thereby have become an apostle, then proclaim his words, expound what he has taught, be a friend to his apostles and do not contend with me, who am his confidant; for you have in hostility withstood me, who am a firm rock, the foundation stone of the Church"
    -Homily 17 Section XIX
    On the pauline credo currently called trinitanity Peter said
    "For some from among the Gentiles have rejected my lawful preaching and have preferred a lawless and absurd doctrine to the man who is my enemy. And indeed some have attempted, while I am still alive, to distort my words by interpretations of many sorts, as if I taught the dissolution of the law… But that may God forbid ! For to do such a thing means to act contrary to the Law of God which was made to Moses and was confirmed by our Lord in its everlasting continuance. For he said, “The heaven and the earth will pass away, but not one jot or one tittle shall pass away from the Law.”
    -Letter of Peter to James, 2.3-5
    Soon after Jesus had selected his twelve apostles, according to Luke, he
    " gave them power and authority over all devils and to cure diseases. And he sent them to preach the kingdom of God, and to heal the sick. And he said unto them: 'Take nothing for your journey, neither staves nor scrip, neither bread, neither money; neither have two coats apiece. And whatsoever house ye enter, there abide and thence depart. And whosoever will not receive you, when ye go out of that city shake off the very dust from your feet for a testimony against them."
    This is the entire charge of Jesus to his apostles when he sent them out to convert the world, as reported by Luke, who claims to give the address or a portion of it, and that presumably the most important portion, word for word. The language here attributed to Jesus conveys no idea that he had any purpose of founding a new church. Neither here nor anywhere else, in the language attributed to him in the New Testament, does he explain the phrase " the kingdom of God " to mean a new ecclesiastical organization. In several passages he does use it to signify the celestial dominion after the destruction of the world; and this is therefore presumably its meaning everywhere.
    The gospel of Matthew is much further than that of Luke in its report of the charge of Jesus to his apostles: "These twelve Jesus sent forth and commanded them, saying: 'Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not; but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.", "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth; I am come not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother... He that receiveth a prophet in the name of a prophet, shall receive a prophet's reward; and he that receiveth a righteous man shall receive a righteous man's reward."
    This charge, as reported by Matthew omitted nearly all the main ideas that would have been appropriate in an address instructing the twelve to preach the foundation of Christianity. It does not say whether Jesus wished to reform or to supersede Judaism; whether his principal purpose was ecclesiastical, moral, political, or sanitary. The remarks about healing the sick and casting out devils is the most explicit of all the instructions.
    Certainly no reader can learn from that charge that Jesus intended to establish a new religion; and much less can he learn any feature of the faith or discipline of a projected new church. And this address is that portion of the New Testament where such information should be given most clearly. He made no doctrinal definition and no ecclesiastical organization. He did not use the key words of the original doctrines necessary to Christianity or a new church, nor the keywords of ideas afterwards associated with Christianity, such as Incarnation, Trinity, Immaculate Conception, and Transubstantiation.
    The subjects to which the most space or most prominence is given in the sayings attributed, in the gospels, to Jesus, are, First, the Mosaic law; Second, judgment day; Third, faith; Fourth, the sins of the Pharisees; Fifth, ascetic morality; and Sixth, his divine commission.
    Christendom was always an empirial religion, born under the auspices of constantine, the subjects were converted at the edge of the sword and rendered into slaves for his majesty, often referring to him as their lord. In Islam such slavery is unthinkable. The only lordship is that of the creator, no station into which man was brought into the lands of Islam was to any degree as bad as the repugnant chattel slavery brought by the primitive tribalism inherent in their texts. Constantine chose regularly to refer to himself as the “servant of God” (famulus dei/therapon tou theou) in official writings. By the fifth century, this metaphor of subordination had been redeployed from theological to political contexts as the subjects of the emperor came to refer to themselves as “slaves of the emperor.” And by the sixth, Justinian insisted all his officials swear an oath that they would demonstrate their service to the emperor “with genuine slavehood” (gnesia douleia) building on Paul’s revalorization of the vocabulary of slavery, and particularly the word doulos came to be applied to a variety of hierarchical relationships, even as it also continued to be used specifically of chattel slaves. By the middle Byzantine period, this expansion of the semantic range of the root doul- eventually gave the abstract nominal form douleia, meaning laborer.
    Triune nonsense is straight out of the Roman Pantheon. Hercules, anyone? Cerberus? The trinity of Zeus, Athena Apollo, literally called the Triune. Greek goddess Hecate was portrayed in triplicate, a three-in-one. This was all done to make the creed more digestible, followed by mental gymnastics attempting to reconcile the onsensical with elaborate theories. Why doesn't a square peg fit into a round hole? Answer by saying it's a mystery instead of geometries not lining up. No such thing as the bible, the new testament is a concoction of several books that were deemed canonical, books written in Greek that were given the hellenized names of Apotsles who neither wrote, nor spoke greek to give it an illusion of antiquity, much like the calendar we have today, which was established in the year 535 CE by Dionysus Exegesis so too was the original message altered to that of the pauline credo, a digestible religion to the yet to be converted greeks who had no desire to follow the mosaic laws.
    There never was such another epidemic of ecclesiastical forgery. The church was flooded with books attributed falsely to apostolic times and authors. The names of many of these books, and the texts of some, are preserved. Distinguished saints and learned fathers of the faith openly commended the invention and acceptance of false- hoods designed to aid the conversion of the world to what they believed to be truth.
    None of the disciples spoke of trinity, ate pork or proclaimed it is allowable to do so, yet the miracle begotten paul, whom peter called him enemy, introduced his new creed according to his whims It proclaimed the abrogation of the Mosaic ceremonial law. It announced itself as a new and independent religion; calling its adherents Christians, and their doctrine Christianity.
    Rationality was only born with Islam, those who cannot count have nothing to say, at the end of the day 1+1+1 will never equal 1
    God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.

  • @mznxbcv12345
    @mznxbcv12345 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    "Jesus" did not intend to establish a new religion.
    In the opening chapters of Acts we find two addresses by Peter, one delivered to the disciples when an apostle to succeed Judas Iscariot was to be chosen, and the other to the Jews on the day of Pentecost. On neither occasion did the speaker mention a new religion, or a church open to Gentiles as well as to Jews, or an abandonment of the Mosaic law.
    If these ideas had been in his mind at that time, he could not have omitted some reference to them. That the apostles and disciples in Jerusalem continue for at least eighteen years to comply with the requirements of the Mosaic law is proved by the epistle of Paul and also by Acts.
    In the latter book we read that at time not specified, probably not earlier than 40 C.E Peter went to Joppa and there ate with Gentiles-^that i he violated the Pharisaic interpretation of one of the Mosaic ceremonial rules-and after his return to Jesus; then, he was called to account by his fellow disciple He justified his conduct, not on the ground that Jesus had abrogated the ceremonial law of Moses, or any part of it, but that in a dream he had received a divine communication telling him that all manner of beasts, fowls, an creeping things were clean, and that it was lawful for him to keep company with Gentiles, who were " unclean under the law of Moses. This announcement was accepted as authoritative, but with much surprise, " becaus that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost."'
    This statement of the revelation to Peter, and of it acceptance by the disciples in Jerusalem, is doubtless a invention of the author of Acts. It cannot be brought into harmony with later passages of his own book, nor with the statements of Paul, who is our only trustworth; witness in these matters.
    According to Acts, about 51 C. E. a council was held in Jerusalem to put an end to the dissension which had arisen in the church on the questions of circumcision and unclean meats. This council decided in favor of Paul, who was in attendance and the decision as given in a letter addressed not to all Christians but only to " the brethren which are of the Gentiles in Antioch and Syria and Cilicia"-where Paul had been making converts, informing them that they were not required to observe the Mosaic ceremonial law. It is quite clear that no such council would have been held if the matter had been decided ten years before, as Acts says it had been.
    But this account of the council of 51 C. E. is also a fiction.
    About eight years later Paul went to Jerusalem again, and his appearance there provoked a riot. The mob wanted to kill him because of his hostility to the Mosaic law, and this mob included Jewish Christians as well as Jews. All the Christians in Jerusalem were zealous adherents of the Mosaic law. Some of the leading brethren, presumably apostles, advised Paul to take a false oath that he did not teach his Jewish converts to neglect the law. And, if we can believe Acts, he took that oath. This, however, did not pacify the mob, which would have put him to death if the Roman soldiers had not protected him. They took him to prison and finally to Rome. This story in Acts implies that the apostolic church adopted one rule of discipline for the Gentile and another for the Jewish Christians; that the latter were, and that the former were not, required to comply with the Mosaic ceremonial law. This duplicity of discipline is not recorded elsewhere. It is not known to Paul ; and if it had existed, he could neither have been ignorant of it nor remained silent about it. He tells us that the twelve apostles in Jerusalem, or those of them known to him, favored strict adherence to Moses; and the only way in which he could get along harmoniously with them was by promising to do no missionary work in Judea. He was to labor among the Gentiles,
    The subjects to which the most space or most prominence is given in the sayings attributed, in the gospels, to Jesus, are, First, the Mosaic law; Second, judgment day; Third, faith; Fourth, the sins of the Pharisees; Fifth, ascetic morality; and Sixth, his divine commission.
    Christendom was always an empirial religion, born under the auspices of constantine, the subjects were converted at the edge of the sword and rendered into slaves for his majesty, often referring to him as their lord. In Islam such slavery is unthinkable. The only lordship is that of the creator, no station into which man was brought into the lands of Islam was to any degree as bad as the repugnant chattel slavery brought by the primitive tribalism inherent in their texts. Constantine chose regularly to refer to himself as the “servant of God” (famulus dei/therapon tou theou) in official writings. By the fifth century, this metaphor of subordination had been redeployed from theological to political contexts as the subjects of the emperor came to refer to themselves as “slaves of the emperor.” And by the sixth, Justinian insisted all his officials swear an oath that they would demonstrate their service to the emperor “with genuine slavehood” (gnesia douleia) building on Paul’s revalorization of the vocabulary of slavery, and particularly the word doulos came to be applied to a variety of hierarchical relationships, even as it also continued to be used specifically of chattel slaves. By the middle Byzantine period, this expansion of the semantic range of the root doul- eventually gave the abstract nominal form douleia, meaning laborer.
    Triune nonsense is straight out of the Roman Pantheon. Hercules, anyone? Cerberus? The trinity of Zeus, Athena Apollo, literally called the Triune. Greek goddess Hecate was portrayed in triplicate, a three-in-one. This was all done to make the creed more digestible, followed by mental gymnastics attempting to reconcile the onsensical with elaborate theories. Why doesn't a square peg fit into a round hole? Answer by saying it's a mystery instead of geometries not lining up. No such thing as the bible, the new testament is a concoction of several books that were deemed canonical, books written in Greek that were given the hellenized names of Apotsles who neither wrote, nor spoke greek to give it an illusion of antiquity, much like the calendar we have today, which was established in the year 535 CE by Dionysus Exegesis so too was the original message altered to that of the pauline credo, a digestible religion to the yet to be converted greeks who had no desire to follow the mosaic laws.
    There never was such another epidemic of ecclesiastical forgery. The church was flooded with books attributed falsely to apostolic times and authors. Distinguished saints and learned fathers of the faith openly commended the invention and acceptance of false- hoods designed to aid the conversion of the world to what they believed to be truth. None of the disciples spoke of trinity, ate pork or proclaimed it is allowable to do so, yet the miracle begotten paul, whom peter called him enemy, introduced his new creed according to his whims It proclaimed the abrogation of the Mosaic ceremonial law. It announced itself as a new and independent religion; calling its adherents Christians, and their doctrine Christianity.
    Trinitarians are inoculated from rationality, facts and logic. It is no surprise that basic reasoning is entirely lost on those that believe that the creator became one of those he created in order to save the created from his own self. Not to mention the incoherence in the scripture, never minding the creed itself.
    Matthew 4:1) Jesus was tempted
    [James 1:13) God cannot be tempted
    (John 1:29) Jesus was seen
    (1 John 4:12) No man has ever seen God
    (Acts 2:22) Jesus was and is a man, sent by God
    (Numbers 23:19, Hosea 11:9) God is not a man
    (Hebrews 5:8-9) Jesus had to grow and learn
    (Isaiah 40:28) God doesn't ever need to learn
    (1 Corinthians 15: 3-4) Jesus Died
    (1 Timothy 1:17) God cannot die
    (Hebrews 5:7) Jesus needed salvation
    (Luke 1:37) God doesn't need salvation
    (Mark 4:38) Jesus slept
    (Psalm 121: 2-4) God doesn't sleep
    (John 5:19) Jesus wasn't all powerful
    (Isaiah 45: 5-7) God is all powerful
    (Mark 13:32) Jesus wasn't all knowing
    (Isaiah 46:9) God is all knowing
    Older one is no different, Abijah was a wicked king, and had war with his rival (1. Kings 15:3).
    2 Chronicles 13:3 says that Abjiah was pious ; that he took the field with 400,000 men against Jeroboam, who was at the head of 800,000 men ; and in a great battle the King of Israel was defeated, and 500,000 of his men slain.
    It seems that, 1,200,000 soldiers sent into the field at one time by two small tribes, and the destruction of 500,000 men in one battle, were beneath the notice of the author of Kings.
    How can one beieve that the One that decrees that which is a 'sin' and that which is good "die for their sins" ? He is the One who decreed it thus, can decree it not so. To whom does the One with whom final authority resides in sacrifice for? a registrar? - No. None are greater than He.
    Rationality was only born with Islam, those who cannot count have nothing to say, at the end of the day 1+1+1 will never equal 1
    God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.

  • @althea_is_smokin_hot
    @althea_is_smokin_hot 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Sir, conversion to islam is the core of islam, and the islamists have used swords for this purpose from day 1,starting with Muhammad in Medina.
    Your case may be an exception,and yet you did convert to Islam after 19 years of persuasion or otherwise.

  • @samsudinsam7727
    @samsudinsam7727 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Assalamualaikum masyaallah agama yang hak benar ajarannya jelas dari allah swt itu agama islam selain agama islam jelas batil sesat tuhannya trinitas patung berhala dll alQuran surat alfath ayat 4 dialah yang telah menurunkan ketenangan kepada hati orang " mukmin untuk menambah keimanan atas keimanan mereka yang telah ada ,dan milik allah lah bala tentara langit dan bumi, dan allah maha mengetahui maha bijaksana

  • @iwak-us1
    @iwak-us1 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Theres no way you two are not twin!!!!

  • @lenwilkinson672
    @lenwilkinson672 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    He must be off his head.

  • @drewmad4744
    @drewmad4744 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Whites muslim will be best ummah...Masha Allah

  • @dheenkuttyvk185
    @dheenkuttyvk185 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    NOT CANVERT REVERT

  • @anamzabrul1807
    @anamzabrul1807 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Asalamualikum warahmatullah.i will call them Revert brother's and sister's 😊.

  • @mznxbcv12345
    @mznxbcv12345 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha" too sounds familiar?
    Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum as will be explained) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization.
    The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا), but this kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua.
    infact "YHWH" itself is an Arabic word as discussed by Professor. Israel Knohl (Professor of Biblical studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem) in the paper" YHWH: The Original Arabic Meaning of the Name."
    jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. An example in English is how the appended -d is a common error amongst the English pronouncing Gaelic names. The name Donald arose from a common English mispronunciation of the Gaelic name Donal. Just how it is with donal becoming donald and the two becoming distinct and the original being regarded as something seperate so too did Isa PBUH turn to Iesous turn to jesus and when they tried going back to the original they confused it for yeshua ( ysu is how it is actually written) for Isa PBUH ( 3'eysah )
    Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language:
    "From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen.
    He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown.
    "protosemetic" Alphabet (28), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22)
    𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼
    ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي
    A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y
    א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
    Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic:
    ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain
    س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining
    ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining
    ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining
    ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining
    ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining
    The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word.
    As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries.
    The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate,
    Language; When one looks at the actual linguistics, one will find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE).
    And then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical.
    Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken?
    The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.
    God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.