Printing the Negative 1: Burning in? Which grade should you use?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ย. 2024
  • Which filter grade should you use for burning in your negatives on multigrade paper? Well, this video might help answer that question and lift your printing a level (pun intended).
    If you like these videos why not become a Patreon? It supports my TH-cam channel, my website, and the writing of my second book.
    John Finch
    Pictorial Planet
    Website: www.pictorialpl...
    Patreon: / johnfinch
    My Book: www.pictorialpl...

ความคิดเห็น • 42

  • @jbaxter007
    @jbaxter007 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was in the darkroom this morning trying out this technique along with F stop printing, on a particularly difficult negative, made it so much easier to get a fairly decent image. Better than my first attempts, bit like layering a cake. These videos are invaluable. Thanks

  • @martin-f5482
    @martin-f5482 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    again and agin you hit the nail, it's a perfect guideline how to get most of your negatives and there are plenty of them, thanks a lot!!!

  • @davidottman9501
    @davidottman9501 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you John. You've answered some of my questions regarding graded vs. split grade printing. I've been going with one or the other, depending on my estimation of where to start with any given negative. This technique adds finesse to answering that question.
    I use a lot of X-ray film. It makes 8x10 size very affordable and I like the look! It tends to run fairly high in contrast, although developing in Rodinal at 1+100 (about 5 minutes) mitigates that to some extent.
    Anyhow, this partial split grade addition is a new avenue to explore, I'm looking forward to using it!

    • @PictorialPlanet
      @PictorialPlanet  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thanks for your comment, David! I do like this way of split grading as it gives me a baseline to start with.

  • @johndaily263
    @johndaily263 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is a great video, thanks, and perfect timing for me to share with my darkroom instructor. We’re about to talk about dodging and burning and filters in class.

    • @johndaily263
      @johndaily263 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      One question, perhaps for a follow-up video: I’d be very curious to see the difference between your final print here and a straight grade 5 print.

    • @PictorialPlanet
      @PictorialPlanet  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Try it on one if your own flat negatives and see what you think.

  • @raybeaumont7670
    @raybeaumont7670 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We have very similar skies in Wales - if not actually chucking it down. So the majority of my prints are split-grade to help separate the tones. A bit more effort but well worth it for the results. Cheers John.

  • @AndrewHenderson
    @AndrewHenderson 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for another great video John.

    • @PictorialPlanet
      @PictorialPlanet  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Cheers, Andrew! I appreciate your support!!

  • @stevenwhite921
    @stevenwhite921 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for sharing John

  • @Mark-el8sb
    @Mark-el8sb 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent insights John, thank you!

  • @gregpantelides1355
    @gregpantelides1355 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you so much for this series, John. If I understand correctly, Grade 5 affects the low zones by expanding the tonal range in those zones. It impacts the lowest zones the most and less and less as you move up the scale up to around Zone 4 or so. Grade 0 affects the high zones by compressing the tonal range in those zones. It impacts the highest zones and less and less as you move down the scale to around Zone 6 or so.
    If we make our base exposure at Grade 3 the reason we would choose to burn in the sky with Grade 5 (as opposed to Grade 0) is that we don't want to compress the tonal range of the clouds. Is that correct?

    • @PictorialPlanet
      @PictorialPlanet  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Spot on! We use grade 5 so we only darken the lower zones in the clouds but keep the nice white stuff white. If we use grade 0 the cloud goes all grey.

  • @TristanColgate
    @TristanColgate 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I spent some time printing last night and for half of it I was desperate to rewatch this. I think I need to make some notes from this in my notebook. Very well demonstrated! Does your book cover this? If not, do you recommend a (readily available) book? (I have AA's The Print, but haven't spent enough time with it).

  • @jbaxter007
    @jbaxter007 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    HI John. brilliant explanation, i get a cold sweat with white bland sky`s, what if there is say a tree or church spire in the sky part of the picture, how would you get around burning the sky and not inadvertently darkening the tree etc, another cold sweat !!

    • @PictorialPlanet
      @PictorialPlanet  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can try a 0 or 1 grade filter. It's often used to burn in windows and not affect the surrounding wall too much.

  • @sheelios
    @sheelios 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi John! i had a question for you. i like photos that have (when using digital processing) an increased "clarity" or "sharpness". a look with increased local contrast/crispness/definition. can that be achieved with burning and dodging in the darkroom? am i correct to say i should burn in at grade 5 to achieve this look?

    • @PictorialPlanet
      @PictorialPlanet  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi! Use an acutance developer and split grade printing for that kind of look.

    • @sheelios
      @sheelios 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@PictorialPlanet ah i will look into that! is there a developer you would suggest? thanks for the quick reply!

    • @PictorialPlanet
      @PictorialPlanet  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @sheelios check out my videos Getting the best from PanF

    • @sheelios
      @sheelios 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@PictorialPlanet will do cheers!

  • @AustenGoldsmithPhotography
    @AustenGoldsmithPhotography 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I envy your exposure times . I did a 20x16 print this evening. 43 seconds contast 5 - . 50 sec burn to foreground contrast 5 . 220 seconds burn to sky contrast 5 !
    5 seconds contrast 0 over all

  • @sheelios
    @sheelios 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    great video! cant wait for the next in this series

  • @majdtaby4560
    @majdtaby4560 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow this is fantastically useful. Thank you so much. Answered a bunch of questions I had

  • @OldJockOldjock
    @OldJockOldjock 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Another well explained video. I wonder if a summary of what you had done with the times and grades applicable to the different areas written on to the finished print might have been worthwhile to reinforce the lesson?
    Given your earlier split grade video it might be worthwhile to use that technique on the same negative to compare and contrast the two outcomes

    • @PictorialPlanet
      @PictorialPlanet  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      These are good ideas! Thanks!!

  • @chihpingliu3290
    @chihpingliu3290 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I really enjoy your videos, they r all very informative and helpful!!

  • @rlfsoso
    @rlfsoso 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    why don't you talk in stops? The 10 seconds on top of the base exposure would be about 1 stop wouldn't it? I believe this gives more meaning and clarity to your (really good and interesting) video…

    • @PictorialPlanet
      @PictorialPlanet  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Good point. I just did an f-stop video as well. You got me there ;)

    • @rlfsoso
      @rlfsoso 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@PictorialPlanetI'd like to add to. my comment: what about doing test strips (f-stopped 1/4 or so ;-) ) say for example of the sky and then add _precisely_ the amount you need? That's the way I do it (though of course with a combination of grades there stikll remains some trial and error)

    • @PictorialPlanet
      @PictorialPlanet  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video was about which grade too use for burning in, not about test strips. I didn't show the whole process because I wanted to focus on the issue I made the video on. What grades do use use to burn in?

  • @chriscard6544
    @chriscard6544 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    another great video about printing after the other one about F-Stop method, thank you