@@drdbrowndc mein Problem war das ich alle Stäbe kürzen musste da ich ein Uhrwerk mit langen Stäben in ein Uhrengehäuse das kleiner war als das Originale Gehäuse eingebaut hatte . Aber klingt auch nicht so Schlecht ^^ .
6:18 you can get one of these tuners... 6:49 tuner in the way. Get rid of it. Lateron let us try the tuner again. We aint gonna say what is on the display of the tuner. But, you can get one of these tuners. Not that they do much, but they are fun to watch at. Or in other words: waste of money.
i hope you did put a link in the description to this wonderful piece of worthless equipment that you clearly did not use to determine the sound Nice to show it though. A tuner. Nice stuff. My ear can do the same.
@@bertjesklotepino I completely agree, the ear is the best, if you have a good sense of tone. I'm not sure what you are driving at because the little tuner did help. It's just one more tool to use to verify your ear tuning. The problem with a chime bar is there are so many overtones that confuse both the ear and the device. They do not produce a clear, single tone. Also if you are not careful muting the other bars they will sympathetically vibrate and complicate matters further.
i am driving at the fact that you did it by ear. The tuner may have helped you somewhat, but you clearly are trained to tune by ear. Plus, to me it did not seem that the tuner device actually did anything. We as viewers of the video were not able to determine what was shown on the device. But in my opinion that is a good thing, because it is clear that you do not need it. And, i do not think it really works. We already solved the problem of tuning many years ago. Why use new technology if the old technology works perfect. The ear, perhaps a fork. This new mumbo jumbo, it may give an indication, but it aint nowhere near accurate. Its crap. If i may be honest. And, you have shown it to be crap, which i expected. Otherwise you would have spend a bit more time on showing the read out on the screen, etc etc. But you just discard of the device when you think you have had enough of it. Therefor i am pretty certain that you yourself think it is crap. Sure, it may help, but why invent the wheel twice. Your ears did the job perfectly. @@drdbrowndc
a saying i keep in my mind goes something like this (btw i am dutch, might explain the strange english)..... Anyways, the saying is this: Computers were invented to solve problems which did not exist before people invented computers. And the same thing is true here. A professional does not need gadgets like these. Mozart did not have gadgets like these. And you have shown that it is junk. Sorry to be making such a fuss about it, but i just think that it would be better if people accept junk is junk. We already have too much junk and no place to store it. @@drdbrowndc
what tool do you use? specify the name of the tool model Thank by Sergio
Das habe ich auch mal versucht , aber nicht ganz hinbekommen ^^
Aufgrund der Oberwellen und Störungen durch die anderen 4 Klangstäbe ist dies schwierig. Mach weiter so!
@@drdbrowndc mein Problem war das ich alle Stäbe kürzen musste da ich ein Uhrwerk mit langen Stäben in ein Uhrengehäuse das kleiner war als das Originale Gehäuse eingebaut hatte . Aber klingt auch nicht so Schlecht ^^ .
Wow! Das war eine Menge Arbeit, die Sie leisten mussten. Ich bin froh, dass es dir gut gelungen ist.@@michaelkauffmann1308
6:18 you can get one of these tuners...
6:49 tuner in the way. Get rid of it.
Lateron let us try the tuner again.
We aint gonna say what is on the display of the tuner.
But, you can get one of these tuners. Not that they do much, but they are fun to watch at.
Or in other words: waste of money.
i hope you did put a link in the description to this wonderful piece of worthless equipment that you clearly did not use to determine the sound
Nice to show it though.
A tuner. Nice stuff.
My ear can do the same.
@@bertjesklotepino I completely agree, the ear is the best, if you have a good sense of tone. I'm not sure what you are driving at because the little tuner did help. It's just one more tool to use to verify your ear tuning. The problem with a chime bar is there are so many overtones that confuse both the ear and the device. They do not produce a clear, single tone. Also if you are not careful muting the other bars they will sympathetically vibrate and complicate matters further.
i am driving at the fact that you did it by ear.
The tuner may have helped you somewhat, but you clearly are trained to tune by ear.
Plus, to me it did not seem that the tuner device actually did anything.
We as viewers of the video were not able to determine what was shown on the device.
But in my opinion that is a good thing, because it is clear that you do not need it.
And, i do not think it really works.
We already solved the problem of tuning many years ago. Why use new technology if the old technology works perfect. The ear, perhaps a fork.
This new mumbo jumbo, it may give an indication, but it aint nowhere near accurate.
Its crap. If i may be honest.
And, you have shown it to be crap, which i expected.
Otherwise you would have spend a bit more time on showing the read out on the screen, etc etc.
But you just discard of the device when you think you have had enough of it.
Therefor i am pretty certain that you yourself think it is crap.
Sure, it may help, but why invent the wheel twice. Your ears did the job perfectly.
@@drdbrowndc
a saying i keep in my mind goes something like this (btw i am dutch, might explain the strange english).....
Anyways, the saying is this:
Computers were invented to solve problems which did not exist before people invented computers.
And the same thing is true here.
A professional does not need gadgets like these.
Mozart did not have gadgets like these.
And you have shown that it is junk.
Sorry to be making such a fuss about it, but i just think that it would be better if people accept junk is junk.
We already have too much junk and no place to store it.
@@drdbrowndc