I suggest you are spot on. They were married for over 70 years. For him she was his “job” and imho he did his utmost to ensure he followed her father’s dictate. For her, he was her “strength and stay”, the only man she had ever loved. So yes I think this may have been close to the mark.
How do you know they didn't have a private conversation like that ? The fun part of this question is that you don't know because if it were a conversation they had privately , it would have been between them and nobody else. Therefore we would never know about it .
Can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. Some just don't have what it takes. Some say Princess Anne would have been the better choice, but I would wonder about those after her. 🤷
I get its all symbolic of how those 2 died, but cmon I want to see the very end. Lets see the drama with harry and andrew, the olympics planning, the pandemic all of it. We saw the very beginning of Elizabeth's reign, lets see the final part of it.
The party IS over. Britain is over. All things come to an end. The US stands alone as the defender of the globalized system Britain began 500 years ago. The torch has been passed to the US. Wish us luck!
As Starmer wrecks our country and children’s futures, Charles argues with his brother about vacating a grace and favour home. THAT is the true face of Royalty, utterly self centred. But there again, who wants a Starmer, Blair, Cameron, Johnson, Sunak or May as “El Presidente”. Sigh!
I don't know what you mean by Starmer wrecking anything (much better than the previous lot), but what should Charles do? He is a figurehead, a ceremonial head of state. And by throwing (trying to, at least) his brother out, he is doing the right thing. So he is doing the right thing in the one domain where he can actually do something.
@@kaszaspeter77 Well we are both seeing these matters through different optics. Regarding Charles and his spate with his brother, the point I make is specific in that one would have thought there were far more important issues going on for the head of state at this time, not least Comrade Starmer’s clear bias in respect of the law of the land and who he supports and his authoritarian first steps. But as usual, it being my opinion; Charles does not see much outside of his immediate and entitled view. Certainly not a leader, like Starmer. However, for what it’s worth, I agree with you about the past tory lot, but not that this labour lot are or will prove any better. In summary I see no difference between any of them, and to suggest that Charles is a “figurehead etc” is plainly nonsensical if meant he does not exercise power. The Royals hold power that is exercised constantly and that has happened for centuries. The Head of State is, de facto, above the law and that cannot be right in the 21c. But, you obviously feel otherwise. Do you not think that Starmer and Charles only make a “fit” because both are clearly not leadership material? Don’t answer that, I know the answer already.
@@Daniel-deMerrivaleare you inside the government? Have you met Starmer? Can you see the future? No? Then all you’ve got is an unqualified opinion then haven’t you? Sit down.
@@dheheehrjfif3259 Know what? “Opinions” are vital for democracy, “opinions” are for open debate. Shouting people down, telling them to “sit down” is actually alien to British culture. Should you bother to read my final sentence in my original comment, should you understand it, you might catch on that my opinion is that whilst I challenge the present King’s leadership qualities (as did his own Father) I still would not like a presidential system, especially under those I named. So, why not engage your brain and give me your opinion on the subject matter?
I still can’t believe they made her majesty death subject of a show! They could never know what those two people really felt about life. I think this is ridiculous
The show has a specific disclaimer stating its a fictional portrayal of real life events. By your logic no one should ever make a film about a historical figure because they would never truly know how they felt about life or what was said in private.
I'm sorry , do you need a tissue or something else to dab your eyes ? You seem to be crying over spilt milk and it is rather how shall we say , childish ?
![ILLSLICK - KILLSHOT REMIX [FULL VERSION]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RIK8RrqIAzE/mqdefault.jpg)
"You are one of a kind...." 😢
How true!
he sure was right!
While this conversation is fictional, I like to think this is how they were with each other in private
I suggest you are spot on. They were married for over 70 years. For him she was his “job” and imho he did his utmost to ensure he followed her father’s dictate. For her, he was her “strength and stay”, the only man she had ever loved. So yes I think this may have been close to the mark.
How do you know they didn't have a private conversation like that ? The fun part of this question is that you don't know because if it were a conversation they had privately , it would have been between them and nobody else. Therefore we would never know about it .
Philip: that lot's not ready.
You mean your children, whom you raised?
“Raised”
@@eddiemoran8044 What are you, an echo?
Can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. Some just don't have what it takes. Some say Princess Anne would have been the better choice, but I would wonder about those after her. 🤷
This is clearly the writers’ view. Not actually borne out by reality.
You do know this is fiction, right?
so sad its all finished
So sad that Philip was right!
Imedla Staunton is one of my favorites.
And Philip is true. King Charles is still not ready.
He’s in his 70’s how long he need? Lol 😂
@@ddviper8813 You tell me. Even now he is trying too hard to appeal to what is trendy and gives him popularity. Not what is right.
Prophetic...
Poignant scenes.
There's was one of the great love stories.
When there are no more royals the world will find new ones.
We have them here in the US. Ever heard of the Kardashians?
Taylor Swift.
Ryan Reynolds
Amen
If you want to see more iconic scenes from The Crown, SUBSCRIBE to our channel! 👑
I get its all symbolic of how those 2 died, but cmon I want to see the very end. Lets see the drama with harry and andrew, the olympics planning, the pandemic all of it. We saw the very beginning of Elizabeth's reign, lets see the final part of it.
The party IS over. Britain is over. All things come to an end. The US stands alone as the defender of the globalized system Britain began 500 years ago. The torch has been passed to the US. Wish us luck!
I remembered game of thrones 😂😂
If it didn't end in a blast, it's not King's Landing... lol
wait until he remembers his younger self
Sorry, Philip, soul sleep is heretical…
"The system makes no sense any more." It stopped making sense long before you two entered the scene.
PC woke comment
It never made sense.
@@PhilAlumbwnat does woke mean?
@@racatkns9977woke means focusing on equality, being unpatriotic and looking down on your own countries history
Americans 😅
Wow… phil was sure full of himself
As Starmer wrecks our country and children’s futures, Charles argues with his brother about vacating a grace and favour home. THAT is the true face of Royalty, utterly self centred. But there again, who wants a Starmer, Blair, Cameron, Johnson, Sunak or May as “El Presidente”. Sigh!
I don't know what you mean by Starmer wrecking anything (much better than the previous lot), but what should Charles do? He is a figurehead, a ceremonial head of state. And by throwing (trying to, at least) his brother out, he is doing the right thing. So he is doing the right thing in the one domain where he can actually do something.
@@kaszaspeter77 Well we are both seeing these matters through different optics. Regarding Charles and his spate with his brother, the point I make is specific in that one would have thought there were far more important issues going on for the head of state at this time, not least Comrade Starmer’s clear bias in respect of the law of the land and who he supports and his authoritarian first steps. But as usual, it being my opinion; Charles does not see much outside of his immediate and entitled view. Certainly not a leader, like Starmer. However, for what it’s worth, I agree with you about the past tory lot, but not that this labour lot are or will prove any better. In summary I see no difference between any of them, and to suggest that Charles is a “figurehead etc” is plainly nonsensical if meant he does not exercise power. The Royals hold power that is exercised constantly and that has happened for centuries. The Head of State is, de facto, above the law and that cannot be right in the 21c. But, you obviously feel otherwise. Do you not think that Starmer and Charles only make a “fit” because both are clearly not leadership material? Don’t answer that, I know the answer already.
@@Daniel-deMerrivaleare you inside the government? Have you met Starmer? Can you see the future? No? Then all you’ve got is an unqualified opinion then haven’t you? Sit down.
@@dheheehrjfif3259 Know what? “Opinions” are vital for democracy, “opinions” are for open debate. Shouting people down, telling them to “sit down” is actually alien to British culture. Should you bother to read my final sentence in my original comment, should you understand it, you might catch on that my opinion is that whilst I challenge the present King’s leadership qualities (as did his own Father) I still would not like a presidential system, especially under those I named. So, why not engage your brain and give me your opinion on the subject matter?
@@dheheehrjfif3259 You also. You would censor a different opinion which makes you a Facist.
I still can’t believe they made her majesty death subject of a show! They could never know what those two people really felt about life. I think this is ridiculous
The show has a specific disclaimer stating its a fictional portrayal of real life events. By your logic no one should ever make a film about a historical figure because they would never truly know how they felt about life or what was said in private.
Omg just let people enjoy the show.
You are not obliged to watch it !
I'm sorry , do you need a tissue or something else to dab your eyes ? You seem to be crying over spilt milk and it is rather how shall we say , childish ?
Its over but there will be another series, The Crown II which will just continue this ridiculous fantasy and end with the crowning of King George VII.
Can't wait
Prefer Trump, Harris Putin, Macron or Xi obviously
@@Richard-yd1ws Putin has already been covered by Shakespeare's Richard III
If it bothers you, don't watch. Problem solved.
Would love to see that!