Capitalized Value - Engineering Economics Lightboard

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 33

  • @shdewhwjuwys9489
    @shdewhwjuwys9489 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This guy just amazingly explaining the topic which my teacher struggled to make understand me, wonderful

  • @alonkulungrai3796
    @alonkulungrai3796 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    For me, you are the father of engineering economics.

  • @rwaleed99
    @rwaleed99 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    By far! The best engineering economics course EVER

    • @EngineeringEconomicsGuy
      @EngineeringEconomicsGuy  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks! Awesome comment, I'm glad you like my Channel! Good luck in your course.

    • @rwaleed99
      @rwaleed99 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are welcome, Thank you! Yup I need luck, I'm taking the FE test in a month. I wonder if you teach any other engineering subjects ?

    • @EngineeringEconomicsGuy
      @EngineeringEconomicsGuy  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I do teach other subjects but not on TH-cam...YET! I uploaded 2 Geotechnical Engineering videos to this Channel - go to my main channel page and look for the Geotech Playlist. Hopefully more to come in the next year. Try "enGENIEer" on TH-cam for some other Exam prep info th-cam.com/users/enGENIEerplaylists Good luck on your Exam!

    • @rwaleed99
      @rwaleed99 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you so much! I will look into it and I'll be on the lookout of all your new videos :)

    • @rwaleed99
      @rwaleed99 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EngineeringEconomicsGuy I'm an Electrical Engineer :)

  • @radprk42
    @radprk42 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    this was amazing, thank you for your efforts

  • @danhtainguyen8547
    @danhtainguyen8547 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you so much sir. Yo has helped me a lot

  • @kennethtruong4307
    @kennethtruong4307 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For the 15-yr 'cycle' cost can you also use the present worth factor to find the present worth value or do you have to use the capitalized value equation because it involves annuities?

    • @EngineeringEconomicsGuy
      @EngineeringEconomicsGuy  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good question. Because the 15 year cycle cost goes on 'forever' you can't use the standard present worth factor; you need to use the 'capitalized value' formula. Notice that I showed 2 ways of doing it!

    • @kennethtruong4307
      @kennethtruong4307 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@EngineeringEconomicsGuy Oh I see, thanks for the help and I hope you have a nice day! Your lectures are the best!

    • @EngineeringEconomicsGuy
      @EngineeringEconomicsGuy  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you!!

  • @vishvakvichu4222
    @vishvakvichu4222 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Impressive presentation!

  • @ibnuahmedbare1201
    @ibnuahmedbare1201 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is amazing !!! I am enjoying the concepts now. wow! I have quick question here. For the effective interest rate, why are you not using the formula: ieff - (1+r/m)^K how is r/m=0.08? it kinda makes sense conceptually because the 8% annual "per year" but then how about the K? how is it 15. is it not suppose to be subperiods*15? I rewatched your other video about nominal and effective interest as well. while it was illuminating enough about this concept, I lost my thought process in this one. Thanks for the help. YOU are videos are amazing. I am glad I found this channel

    • @EngineeringEconomicsGuy
      @EngineeringEconomicsGuy  16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Glad you like the Channel! Yes, the problem in this video is a little unusual. It really hinges around the concept of the present value of a perpetuity. The 8% is an annual rate (it is both the nominal AND the effective rate since there are no sub-periods). The 15 is used to calculate a 'weird' effective-15-year-interest-rate. We need this because we have payments at occur once every 15 years. Give the video another try... the explanation is good. Good luck in your course!

  • @m.abubakrarqam4278
    @m.abubakrarqam4278 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    do you have any video for comparing alternatives question?

    • @EngineeringEconomicsGuy
      @EngineeringEconomicsGuy  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, th-cam.com/video/g1hI58w_FtI/w-d-xo.html
      This link takes you to a video using Incremental IRR for comparing projects.

  • @Iellec342
    @Iellec342 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    what if the annual cost is different per year? would you add it all?

    • @EngineeringEconomicsGuy
      @EngineeringEconomicsGuy  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good question. If the annual cash flows are not a constant amount then you can't use the idea of a 'perpetuity' (meaning a repeating amount that goes on "forever"). If the dollar-amounts are different each year, the best you can do is bring each individual cash flow back to the present (using the P/F compound interest factor). You could do this for each cash flow that you know. Excel has the "NPV" function that would come in handy for this task! I have another video explaining that. th-cam.com/video/NcO7LyJE8bA/w-d-xo.html But, in general, if the annual cash flows are all different values, then you can't apply the calculation shown in this video. Thanks for the question - good luck in your course!

    • @EngineeringEconomicsGuy
      @EngineeringEconomicsGuy  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      By the way, you definitely can't "add" the costs like you mentioned in your original question. I tell my students that the 'golden rule' of engineering economics (and finance) is: You can't add dollar amounts that occur at different points in time! You must always use the 'time value of money' compound interest factors when performing calculations!

  • @albertmungamelo2936
    @albertmungamelo2936 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    at 1:30,isnt the P supposed to be negative?... since the money is bieng spent not earned.

    • @albertmungamelo2936
      @albertmungamelo2936 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      OK i get it ,its positive because the school is yearly bieng Given the money,in general ,the University is receiving $ P yearly ,then it chanels $1,000 to a yearly scholarship at an interest rate of 10% .
      (meaning $1000 is just 10% of the P(received money by University)
      may you please....

    • @EngineeringEconomicsGuy
      @EngineeringEconomicsGuy  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think you've got it! Good luck in your course!!

  • @onefun289
    @onefun289 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you sir