Extremely helpful. I'll keep this in mind about the number of chips found and as you've demonstrated here the problem chips(s) might be located far away from that number on the board. Subscribed and I'm looking through your other videos now too. Thanks for the helpful video!
19:11 friend at this point. Which points you press with the tester to override the top chain of chips and the tester in which mode you use it for this procedure. Sorry for so many questions in all your videos, but I'm really obsessed and need to learn!
64 ASIC on an S17+ is the equivalent of a -1 on an S19. Should always start with the dichotomy method until you located the faulty chip whenever encountering a 64 ASIC
The tester reads total logic chips present and responding to voltage. You still have to identify the chip that is giving an issue. 64 doesnt mean 64. It means 64/total. Rtfm!!
I use an AmScope microscope. In my opinion they are the golden standard for repair microscopes. When I went from a USB microscope to an optical one it was night and day as far as image clarity. Not cheap but well worth it in my opinion. Especially if you do it professionally or have any sort of volume.
Hi < What prices are you getting for Basic HashBoard Repair , S -17 or S-19 version , 4 chip change only ( Basic Repair ) and it takes about an Hour on average ?? Thanks .
hello, what do you recommend to mark the hash board? It is so that they are not confused with other people hash boards. the issue is that my customer needs the mark not to be erased with the cleaning maintenance, he thinks his hash boards are being changed. Thank you
Personally I have a database where I enter customer info, board details, and which board belongs to which customer. That way I know which serial number belongs to which customer. I also double check before sending them back I also use a piece of masking tape on the board as a quick reference that I remove before sending the boards back of course. As for cleaning, I use air only. I don't use an ultrasonic cleaner since I find it too aggressive. Hope this helps.
@@asicrepaircanada159, I was not clear, my customer wants to mark all his boards because he has them in a common container with other miners. Thank you
hello, I have a problem with my s17+ hashboard, I find 1.8v on the first chip and I wanted to know how to test between the power supply and the first chip please
@@asicrepaircanada159 is it worth it for DIY repairs? I've contacted you for UK based repairs passing them onto yourself but I'd like to learn how to repair the T17 model myself for immersion
@@joshuanaismith8593 It's one of those nice to have if you are doing volume but I have worked a long time with a basic tester based on a S17+ control board and it works just fine.
Sorry I thought I replied to your comment.... you can use a S17+ control board and but the test file on a SD card. That's basically what the imported test fixtures are. I think there is one hardware difference when it comes to spooling up the fans. The few tests I have done, it seems the fans were never spooling up when the test was starting. They need to so I just ended up powering the fans separately. I personally use the asic repair center tester: tester.asic.repair/
Extremely helpful. I'll keep this in mind about the number of chips found and as you've demonstrated here the problem chips(s) might be located far away from that number on the board. Subscribed and I'm looking through your other videos now too. Thanks for the helpful video!
19:11 friend at this point. Which points you press with the tester to override the top chain of chips and the tester in which mode you use it for this procedure. Sorry for so many questions in all your videos, but I'm really obsessed and need to learn!
64 ASIC on an S17+ is the equivalent of a -1 on an S19. Should always start with the dichotomy method until you located the faulty chip whenever encountering a 64 ASIC
Never even seen a S19 so I wouldn't know....
@@asicrepaircanada159 would you like too ? :) i have a few here i can ship for you to work on
The tester reads total logic chips present and responding to voltage. You still have to identify the chip that is giving an issue. 64 doesnt mean 64. It means 64/total.
Rtfm!!
Are you applying 20V the entire time you are checking voltages? wouldnt the board heat up if its under power or is it fine because its not hashing?
Very helpful bro! Nice job thank you!
but by any way u done good job ,thanks for correct info in diag...
I am looking for s17pro repair in the Portland, Or area, or within driving distance... any thoughts?
Excellent work, one question, what microscope do you use?
I use an AmScope microscope. In my opinion they are the golden standard for repair microscopes. When I went from a USB microscope to an optical one it was night and day as far as image clarity. Not cheap but well worth it in my opinion. Especially if you do it professionally or have any sort of volume.
@@asicrepaircanada159 Gracias!! Thanks!!
Very good video, thank you!
Hi < What prices are you getting for Basic
HashBoard Repair , S -17 or S-19 version ,
4 chip change only ( Basic Repair ) and
it takes about an Hour on average ?? Thanks .
Nice job, thanks for sharing. That's the russian tester,correct? where did you get it and how much did you pay for it?
Info is here. tester.asic.repair/en
Whether you should send money to russia right now, not sure...
What flux are you using ? Also when replacing chips are you heating from top of chip or below ?
I use Chip quik tacky flux. SMD29130CC to be exact.
hello, what do you recommend to mark the hash board? It is so that they are not confused with other people hash boards. the issue is that my customer needs the mark not to be erased with the cleaning maintenance, he thinks his hash boards are being changed. Thank you
Personally I have a database where I enter customer info, board details, and which board belongs to which customer. That way I know which serial number belongs to which customer. I also double check before sending them back
I also use a piece of masking tape on the board as a quick reference that I remove before sending the boards back of course.
As for cleaning, I use air only. I don't use an ultrasonic cleaner since I find it too aggressive.
Hope this helps.
@@asicrepaircanada159, I was not clear, my customer wants to mark all his boards because he has them in a common container with other miners. Thank you
@@ramonnavarro2440 I think he should just note the serial numbers then. Or write in sharpie pen on the board itself.
Thank you!!, I appreciate it.
hello, I have a problem with my s17+ hashboard, I find 1.8v on the first chip and I wanted to know how to test between the power supply and the first chip please
Content de t'avoir aidé!
Solder Dance at 29:18.
I have a S9 board thats tests good but wont run in when in a miner.. Freaking crazy man
i wonder if its a control board issue
Hello, where can I get the test device you are using?
tester.asic.repair/en
@@asicrepaircanada159 is it worth it for DIY repairs?
I've contacted you for UK based repairs passing them onto yourself but I'd like to learn how to repair the T17 model myself for immersion
@@joshuanaismith8593 It's one of those nice to have if you are doing volume but I have worked a long time with a basic tester based on a S17+ control board and it works just fine.
@ASIC Repair Canada
Can you link your recommended budget test fixture for S17+?
Is it just a spare control board and bench power supply?
Thanks.
Sorry I thought I replied to your comment.... you can use a S17+ control board and but the test file on a SD card. That's basically what the imported test fixtures are. I think there is one hardware difference when it comes to spooling up the fans. The few tests I have done, it seems the fans were never spooling up when the test was starting. They need to so I just ended up powering the fans separately. I personally use the asic repair center tester: tester.asic.repair/
if use web interface of tester at first u will not work so much...
The web interface shows the same thing as the number on the tester.
A 64 ASIC almost always results in needing to use the dichotomy method to find the faulty chip. The tester isn't usefully for this error.