The first time I saw Taylor Series in Calc II I had no idea what I was doing. Now that I'm taking D.Es, this is finally starting to make sense and I can say that having a good understanding of Taylor Series will prove to be extremely useful.
Pi is also wrong. It gives shorter circumference length if compared to the actual circunference in reality. Tiny arcs are confused with straight lines. It’s an ignoring of some length/area that is actually exist. What if the slice is so tiny till millions parts? They’re supposed to be counted as well. In fact, not.
I'm a bit late, but it's to bound its magnitude overall; if the error is positive, it should be less than or equal to a certain M. If the error is negative, it should be bigger than or equal to a certain (negative) M. So you get: -M
Yep, videos like this will earn you a total of a million subscribers! (sarcasm) Seriously though, you lost me with the fucking title. Remember me when I apply for a job in your corporation in ten years.
Dude wtf. Waste of time. I already knew the definition of what a remainder was. I did not need a 11 min lecture on that. This title is deceiving. Show my how to set it up.
![ILLSLICK X YOUNGOHM - We're The same [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yUJNkobYR0E/mqdefault.jpg)
Taylor is killing my GPA
I swear 😭
mine to
😭😭😭
real
no
It would be nice if you would include an example with it.......
i cant be more thankful bro u saved my day
This guy is always here to rescue when I don't understand something. He makes it so easy.
The first time I saw Taylor Series in Calc II I had no idea what I was doing.
Now that I'm taking D.Es, this is finally starting to make sense and I can say
that having a good understanding of Taylor Series will prove to be extremely useful.
D. Es?
@@achingaster1199 differential equations i believe
I loved the colors in this vid :) makes studying a tiny bit better.
died laughing when he said screen real-estate
I Really Like The Video Understanding the properties of the remainder or error function for an Nth degree Taylor approximation of a function From Your
Thanks sal for this wonderful video..i really appreciate it..
Thanks Sal for the video
sal you are a legend
you the best sal :)
8:39 its free real estate
Great video
Thank you for this.
We should eat fresh
We should drink fresh
But most importantly we should keep our hand fresh
This is in the realms of numerical analysis.
Very helpful, get some idea behind those equations, Thanks Khan!!
didn't get it at all so confusing this course, change variable as his wish really confusing
Nobody taught us like this 😭....thanku 👍
man i watched the first few minutes and i already understand my whole class hahahah
00:04 An "arbitrary" f(x) needs to have n+1 derivatives in the neighborhood of a according to your lesson.
❤️❤️❤️🙏🙏🙏🙏 for the video
LOL 5:20 not going to write subscript "to keep my hand fresh"
Very quality content
thanks alot
wonderful. Thank you.
Excellent explanation! Cheers!
How can u know everything I search
this is awesome
Only if there was a example in the video
Pet Norvig and Sebastian Thrun reference Sal's videos on their ai-class website!
taylor gang
helpful information. thanks~ XD
what about from a to b?
Pi is also wrong. It gives shorter circumference length if compared to the actual circunference in reality. Tiny arcs are confused with straight lines. It’s an ignoring of some length/area that is actually exist.
What if the slice is so tiny till millions parts? They’re supposed to be counted as well. In fact, not.
Pi isnt "wrong". Its just that any approximation for pi we use will be slightly smaller/bigger than pi seeing as it is irrational.
8:39
why n+1??
In my understanding n equal not N. to me n+1=N. So what is N+1? to me N+1 does not exist. If it is exist to you please show me how!! If you care.
N+1=n+1+1=n+2
I mean you answered your own question
Why did he take the absolute value of the n+1th derivative of E(x)?
I'm a bit late, but it's to bound its magnitude overall; if the error is positive, it should be less than or equal to a certain M. If the error is negative, it should be bigger than or equal to a certain (negative) M. So you get: -M
@@5612dag Thank you.
my test is in a week and i would have been screwed
This is like one calculus course above me ._.
0:30 tf is with this explanation???
that would not be sucks if you include examples
zhina
@ChronoTriggerMusic o.O
This video would have a better like:dislike ratio if it included an actual example...
@wood9670 At least videos like this earns you several million bucks from Google and Bill Gates. ;)
Yep, videos like this will earn you a total of a million subscribers! (sarcasm)
Seriously though, you lost me with the fucking title.
Remember me when I apply for a job in your corporation in ten years.
Nice prediction, buddy.
Deceiving title, waste of time. I want to see the Remainder Theorem in use, not an explanation of it I didn't need.
Want to see how it's used then go watch whatever video whose title contain the word "example"
patrickjmt has a way better video.
This was a waste of time
Maia Carter Your mother.
your family.
🖕
Dude wtf. Waste of time. I already knew the definition of what a remainder was. I did not need a 11 min lecture on that. This title is deceiving. Show my how to set it up.
no one talks to Sal like that. You need to check yourself.
Its common sense, why do you need an example when you have it generally.
RE-----
TARD------
Don't encourage him!
zhina