Can Palmer Luckey Reinvent the U.S. Defense Industry? | WSJ

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1.5K

  • @NChambernator
    @NChambernator 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2007

    "The problem is there's no real competition" "When we buy up companies we look for the most competitive people we can't keep up with"

    • @TheStrangeBloke
      @TheStrangeBloke 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +219

      Smaller companies are typically selling their products to one of the primes. The process for contracting is so complex that a small company essentially can't get a contract for defense by itself.

    • @bernhardzunk7402
      @bernhardzunk7402 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

      Cost plus incentive contracts are supposed to transition to competitively bid fixed price contracts. This is only practical if the product is produced in large numbers and License to several manufacturers or there is a competing product (eg F-16 vs F-17/18) etc. Politics then comes in. Plants need to be kept open in certain congressman's electorate for instance and of course the voters and workers there do need stability.

    • @raquetdude
      @raquetdude 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

      Tech sector approach “move fast and break things” and “fully reliant on low interest rates”

    • @HMuny55
      @HMuny55 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      That is exactly what I came to the comments to type haha.

    • @AntoinettePalermo-xs6it
      @AntoinettePalermo-xs6it 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Elon Musk in Silicone disguise 🥸 aka Skirgailia 666,, aka not so Lucky. “I” just saw you leaving the Dalhart airport dressed in drag as a 50 year old woman w/black curly hair with white blouse.

  • @toddc2788
    @toddc2788 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1594

    Killer graph depicting the merger of defense contractors over time!

    • @1247.cccccc
      @1247.cccccc 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      2002 version page 134 of 319
      history.nasa.gov/AeroCommissionFinalReport.pdf
      Have a nice day.

    • @rickintexas1584
      @rickintexas1584 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

      I’ve been involved in this industry since the early 1980s. That graphic definitely resonated with me.

    • @abdulbasitbello2381
      @abdulbasitbello2381 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      That visualization!!!

    • @mynameisawesomeman
      @mynameisawesomeman 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

      Here's the thing though; you can pick almost any industry and you'll see the same trend. We've got major problems with industry consolidation in the West and no one recognizes it. It's just not healthy for capitalism to be run by oligopolies, for our politics, and aspects of cultural life.

    • @tobasama
      @tobasama 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mynameisawesomeman: If we want a liberal form of capitalism, that's what we'll get.

  • @blank.9301
    @blank.9301 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1603

    “The pharmaceutical industry cares about world health as much as the arms industry cares about world peace”✌️

    • @Pilson360
      @Pilson360 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      In the nuclear age, the true enemy is war itself.

    • @shafthespaceegg
      @shafthespaceegg 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +65

      Just because they’re profit focused doesn’t mean their products are not effective

    • @fire17102
      @fire17102 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

      ​@@shafthespaceeggmaybe, but they are incentivized to protect their market (to put lightly), can't have everyone be healthy, that won't generate profits.. it's like the tinder mechanics, it's not in their profit for you to find long lasting love, it's better for them to keep people coming

    • @shafthespaceegg
      @shafthespaceegg 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@fire17102 but I do see what you’re trying to say with the tinder thing like they’re incentivized to keep you coming back for more

    • @bdub1934
      @bdub1934 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      the arms industry has to evolve or the right to have your opinion will not exist

  • @bobthemagicmoose
    @bobthemagicmoose 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +819

    The main issue is that the big expensive contracts are heavily geared towards jobs creation and not military effectiveness. If your product doesn’t require significant labor to create, it will be difficult to get congressional support, with is usually predicated on funneling money into powerful districts.

    • @Khuros
      @Khuros 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      That's not how anything works. Learn how contracts work.

    • @ebrimajallow9631
      @ebrimajallow9631 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +169

      @@Khuroshe is talking bout how the defense contractors influence congress through job creation and manufacturing. It will be hard for them to influence congress to vote in law that are in thier best interest, because they don’t have the same leverage as other big contractors.

    • @AJ-jx5gm
      @AJ-jx5gm 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Khurosthats how things work in congress. Even NASA has to spend more money building rockets so that more states can get a piece of the $ spent on building the rockets. Politicians in congress create waste in government spending to please businesses and workers in their states in the name of creating jobs and boosting their states' economy.

    • @ihmpall
      @ihmpall 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

      @@Khurosgo to school kid he’s 100% right now

    • @hikerJohn
      @hikerJohn 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

      @@Khuros Contracts may not work that way but congressional funding often does.

  • @zibbitybibbitybop
    @zibbitybibbitybop 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +558

    If Anduril is smart, they'll also do a lot of research into anti-drone weaponry, so either they can harden their drones against it or sell that tech themselves. If they don't, they're liable to see their market dry up due to somebody else perfecting directed energy weapons, or something like that. Drone defenses have evolved in Ukraine just as fast as drone usage.

    • @Almost3331
      @Almost3331 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +89

      You are watching a video that covers anti drone tech. That's part of what road runner does.

    • @eden5260
      @eden5260 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      They have a drone that does that.
      Is that the perfect solution?
      I don't believe so but it is something

    • @h.c4898
      @h.c4898 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      They already have.

    • @Blaze6108
      @Blaze6108 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@Almost3331 Yeah, but the problem here is that anything which is small and needs to fly (and thus presumably has little armor) is a prime target for laser weaponry. That one doesn't get as much press, but lasers have been evolving incredibly rapidly as well.
      Before the 90s everyone thought lasers would be limited to small gas-powered applications, then after the 90s chemical lasers were the most we could do, then solid-state electronics matured and now we have better lasers, and by 2020 even better fiber lasers started to get around.

    • @MelbourneMeMe
      @MelbourneMeMe 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If anduril was smart, they would go apply their tech to win the war in Ukraine. What better test of concept....

  • @davidtaliaferro
    @davidtaliaferro 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +478

    Actually the 5 Defense contractors are thinking about merging into one; the preliminary name is SKYNET.

    • @Zero-lh1rb
      @Zero-lh1rb 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Guess is ChatGPT or Gemini going to be the first hack into Skynet?

    • @theviper3581
      @theviper3581 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      False information. There’s no proof of this online from any reliable source. Even if this were true, it would violate antitrust laws

    • @MR-backup
      @MR-backup 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      What do the other 2 comments here say??????
      😭

    • @samuelsoundararaj
      @samuelsoundararaj 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@MR-backup😅i want to know the same

    • @Zariel_999
      @Zariel_999 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      they probably got deleted by youtube for having links @@MR-backup

  • @user-yg5hk1yb3n
    @user-yg5hk1yb3n 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +184

    This is exactly what the defense industry needs - defense companies taking enough interest in their products to spend more on their projects than the government does - or even funding them alone if they don't get a contract to build it.

    • @youtuberconsuming6411
      @youtuberconsuming6411 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      this is just a money grab. they get paid whether their stuff is effective in the field or not.

    • @Vysair
      @Vysair 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      and goes towards the full automation route

    • @oStealthKiller
      @oStealthKiller 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Probably more like fat subscription fees later on for the software that is needed to use the equipment they paid extra for (think that drone helicopter) to have access to that system’s effectiveness just like the “tech model.”

    • @ashleigh3021
      @ashleigh3021 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@youtuberconsuming6411You’re confusing the two approaches, cost plus contracting literally incentivizes delays.

  • @rhysiieboii
    @rhysiieboii 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +255

    If the war in Ukraine has taught us anything it's that tanks, ships, aircraft are all too easy to destroy with modern systems and buying/maintaining them may not be worth the cost. Low cost, destructive and high quantity systems are a genius way to fight modern wars.

    • @rhysiieboii
      @rhysiieboii 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

      @@mythbuster6126 Not relevant at all but o k

    • @frankrenda2519
      @frankrenda2519 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      what it taught us is america couldnt supply ukraine with a drone with the performance of the russian lancet

    • @rustyyb8450
      @rustyyb8450 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@mythbuster6126 Nuclear just eliminates everyone from the war and acutely focuses them on the business of trying to conserve what's left of their ability to sustain themselves. Nuclear isn't for fighting wars, it's for demotivating the participants and, likely, all of their neighbors.

    • @TheYaegerjeusmc
      @TheYaegerjeusmc 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Quiet kid.

    • @MelbourneMeMe
      @MelbourneMeMe 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Anduril should go apply their trade in Ukraine as a proof of concept experiment. Go win the war, prove yourself, become the defence company of the future.

  • @debojyotipanda938
    @debojyotipanda938 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +305

    The future looks bright man. With all these weapons, the wars of the future will be better than ever before. What a time to be alive!

    • @jameswellham1
      @jameswellham1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

      😂

    • @myndwork
      @myndwork 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      Hold on to your papers

    • @liamsouthwell27
      @liamsouthwell27 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Please read Starship Troopers or serve.

    • @petor95
      @petor95 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      😂

    • @dragonslowroller1541
      @dragonslowroller1541 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just because China is building mega projects for its people doesn't mean they aren't making defense weapons.

  • @sid8987
    @sid8987 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +290

    Andúril, also called the Flame of the West and the Sword Reforged, was the sword which was reforged from the shards of Narsil in Rivendell. Who else thought of Tolkien verse and LOTR when you saw the word Anduril?

    • @kingsonchizi
      @kingsonchizi 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Angry you beat me this comment 😂😂

    • @kingsonchizi
      @kingsonchizi 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Sauron's bane

    • @ruprup-p1h
      @ruprup-p1h 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

      3:14 And tell me that isnt an Elf Haha

    • @okinawanah3463
      @okinawanah3463 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Palantir

    • @oicirbaFabricio
      @oicirbaFabricio 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I am reading Lord of the Rings now :)

  • @musicalintuition
    @musicalintuition 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +95

    Sorry, but to go faster than Mach 1, or for full explosive yield, you need to be a premium member. Monthly packages start at 1999$ per drone.

    • @BasedTruthSeeker
      @BasedTruthSeeker 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Its the military so $199,999 per

    • @mill2712
      @mill2712 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@BasedTruthSeeker
      Considering such super sonic vehicles like jets can cost tens of thousands per flight hour, paying 2,000 or even 200,000 a month per something like that might be preferable.

    • @JazenValencia
      @JazenValencia 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Shut up and take my money.

  • @rhinostar3825
    @rhinostar3825 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    "That's kind of one of the coolest things about autonomous systems, not nacessarily the fact that they can think faster or do better than a person, but they can also just throw away their lives"
    - Pamer Luckey

  • @ac1888
    @ac1888 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +117

    I can only imagine the calculation that it took to engineer Mr. Lucky’s perfect mullet. Not to long not to short.

    • @bonedeath
      @bonedeath 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He's not gonna pick you dude, chill out

    • @ac1888
      @ac1888 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      @@bonedeath What? Why would I want to be picked for anything. I am military retired. That was an asinine comment. You should sit down.

    • @Norsilca
      @Norsilca 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      He did perfectly engineer the worst hair and facial hair possible.

    • @stevetennispro
      @stevetennispro 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They do hire military people. Just saying.@@ac1888

  • @sunnindawg
    @sunnindawg 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    Moneyball Military-a massive arsenal of smaller, lower-cost, autonomous systems that can be generated over the next few years, fielded rapidly and at scale to US forces, and transferred in large numbers to our allies and partners. This would also require the generation of an alternative industrial base to produce at scale what would essentially be commercially derived, consumable weapon systems.
    and the digital means of connecting them into a military version of the Internet of Things.

    • @oStealthKiller
      @oStealthKiller 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And like factoring in the value for “goodwill” in accounting for investments (usually social cause related), the value if an individual’s life, both in dollars lost (training, etc.) and in war edfort morale, is difficult to calculate but autonomous AI driven drone systems eliminate a huge portion of that portion of the sacrifices necessary for victory. There are A LOT of potential dangers with a system like that (like an enemy utilizing cyberattacks to turn your entire fleet against you simultaneously), but allowing yourself to be surpassed in that realm out of fear for the unknown is a recipe for disaster. I hope this company eats everyone’s lunch or forces them to innovate intensely.

    • @CKxperience
      @CKxperience 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That exists only in china.

  • @CertifiedClapaholic
    @CertifiedClapaholic 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +98

    It's fascinating the lengths we humans go to in order to end the lives of others. Truly remarkable and sad.

    • @ridnthawave708
      @ridnthawave708 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Good point they can use these drones to fly through the air space to really see what’s in the Antarctic but no they rather develop These things for nefarious uses

    • @Invadix-fs4zr
      @Invadix-fs4zr 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      Or to protect the lives of innocents

    • @CertifiedClapaholic
      @CertifiedClapaholic 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@Invadix-fs4zr which would be the result of.....?

    • @shuckification
      @shuckification 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Invadix-fs4zr by killing more innocent people in the name to protect innocent lives.

    • @sandyovals
      @sandyovals 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It's fascinating the lengths we humans will go to in order to manipulate ideas to fit our personal bias.

  • @deanmachine7971
    @deanmachine7971 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +93

    This is genius. But it will eventually become part of one of the big defense contractors. And if they don't sell out, the big guys will throw a ton of money into developing similar systems. I would imagine they are already in the works at LMT, RTX, BA, NOC, GD, and more. They all see how the cheap drones are able to inflict damage on ships and equpment hundreds or even thousands times more expensive.
    The art of war is constantly changing.

    • @Ragnar707
      @Ragnar707 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      The other primes can make similar systems. The difference is that they are reliant on the contracting model which doesn’t incentivize efficient business. Anduril develops products on their own time and money, and then goes to sell it to the government. So they have every incentive to do things well

    • @3User
      @3User 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Ragnar707 doesn't matter, LM is 10x bigger and has been in the industry so long now that it's essentially integrated into heart of the DOD. This isn't the tech world where some new startup will revolutionize the future, all the systems that Anduril can produce, LM can produce twice as fast.

    • @3User
      @3User 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      to further add onto my point, it seems that anduril is in the typical contractor phase where their ambitions outpace their experience. I've experienced it personally when I've worked with R&D eggheads numerous times testing out some new system for them where they don't understand why I can't instantly see all enemies in an area on thermal sights with a drone when they clearly predicted that it would be incredibly easy to do so without actually understanding how PID works.

    • @BorisForOffice
      @BorisForOffice 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@3User LM cannot produce things twice as fast. Traditional defense contractors produce things ten times as slowly. It's so ingrained in their culture that it would be impossible to fix.
      Small companies have the speed advantage and that is even more true in the defense space.

    • @oStealthKiller
      @oStealthKiller 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      With the money they have now, they are likely going to be a permanent player in the defence software scene.

  • @XxxionxX
    @XxxionxX 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +98

    This is terrifying.

    • @baldieman64
      @baldieman64 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Yes, but there is no putting the genie back in the bottle.
      If the other side is using smart and fast systems, you have to counter with your own, because humans can't react fast enough.

    • @twelvecatsinatrenchcoat
      @twelvecatsinatrenchcoat 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      "I think that it's our responsibility to figure out how to use AI responsibly to MAXIMIZE the amount of pain we inflict on the bad guys." -Palmer Lucky, "Honestly" podcast, 2024.

    • @Nswix
      @Nswix 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Not as terrifying as just sitting by while China and Russia build this stuff.

    • @PatrickBergensen-kali-yuga2005
      @PatrickBergensen-kali-yuga2005 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ooooo shiver me timber

    • @Umanflyumanfly
      @Umanflyumanfly 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@baldieman64 And add in AGI similar to AWS RoboMaker with automated accelerated hypothesis generation thinking .... Batta Bing Batta Boom !

  • @rexringtail471
    @rexringtail471 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    YES! I pitched some things in an RFP a few years back in the defense space. Was shocked that everyone else came in so much more expensive with their offerings until I understood the cost + dynamic and that there are laws limiting your overall profit margin. Why does the DoD care what my profit margin is if my product is better, and I cost 1/5th the other offers to do the job better?

    • @ThegreatGladi
      @ThegreatGladi 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Dude what do u mean by that ? Making profit with defense tech is difficult ??

  • @samlichtensteinthemovie
    @samlichtensteinthemovie 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Black mirror episodes are just a documentary at this point

  • @MechAdv
    @MechAdv 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    I got three interviews with these guys back in 2020, but unfortunately they went with another candidate. This looks like it would have been an absolute engineer’s paradise to work there. Disappointing.

  • @kingandqueenturben8293
    @kingandqueenturben8293 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    Very very very user friendly.. so friendly it wants to hug ALL humans... 🎉

  • @motivatedbyaction3299
    @motivatedbyaction3299 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +71

    This company better have some stellar IP security in place, because they are now on the radar of every adversary.

    • @ktw5141
      @ktw5141 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      there is no IP in warfare. if it falls the enemy's hand they own it

    • @michaelanthony4750
      @michaelanthony4750 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@ktw5141 Yeah what are they going to do, sue someone they are at war with? lol

  • @colekarrh9114
    @colekarrh9114 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Man got fired from making VR and went to the Military Industrial Complex

    • @mcs914
      @mcs914 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Kinda weird don't you think

    • @phlooney
      @phlooney 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      “Jesus wept, for he had no more worlds to conquer!!”

    • @wompstopm123
      @wompstopm123 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the vr changed the way the military works.

  • @loganwolfram4216
    @loganwolfram4216 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Anduril is a neat company. Glad to have them on our side.

  • @TheInfidel_SlavaUA
    @TheInfidel_SlavaUA 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +115

    They certainly got the name right... "Flame of the West" , epic!

    • @robertpatrick3350
      @robertpatrick3350 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Not the pronunciation though……

    • @CulinVlau
      @CulinVlau 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      Sure they did. The irony of using a name from a book whose author disliked the evolution of military technology.

    • @SanjaySingh-oh7hv
      @SanjaySingh-oh7hv 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Palmer Luckey does have a sense of showmanship, I'll give him that. Anduril ... Aragorn's sword from Lord of the Rings... translates Flame of the West in the Common Speech. And perhaps I'm taking this a bit far, but at 0:53, where they show the CRO, for a moment I thought he was an elf because of his ears.

    • @elliotnemeth
      @elliotnemeth 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      ​@@CulinVlau This right here. They should've called themselves Isengard Industries

    • @zagreus5773
      @zagreus5773 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Epic? Tolkien is turning in his grave if he saw his work being used by a military company.

  • @nuclear_robot
    @nuclear_robot 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Amazing innovation!
    However, Anduril needs to change their company name to Cyberdyne to match the trajectory of this narrative.

  • @Errr717
    @Errr717 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    As long as politicians are involved in the acquisition of defense materiel the big primes will always be there to appease them. Additionally the admirals and generals who were influential in the military retire to cushy executive and board level positions at the big primes. Nothing will change. Anduril's best strategy is to work with the people at the bottom of the acquisition chain and get their products to the war fighters who will then demonstrate to their superiors the capabilities of Anduril's products.

  • @chhoc
    @chhoc 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    5:04 that is a superb graphic, well done commission on the future

  • @H0kieJoe
    @H0kieJoe 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    How well will Anduril's systems work after an EMP attack? That same question applies to the rest of the 'connected' battlefield.

    • @seanmcgrady8688
      @seanmcgrady8688 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      It's a good question. One way the US is developing its military to counter China's lots-of-boats-and-rockets strategy is to rely more on powerful but small, numerous squads of marines with lots of drone & tool capabilities. Imagine if you can use a squad of marines & drones with a singular boat to take out a destroyer? That's the way our military is drifting for seaborne combat. Marines have figured out how to launch cruise missiles from trucks recently, so the decentralized punch approach is trending strongly.

    • @batmanyk
      @batmanyk 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      are there NNEMP weapons? I cant find any.
      There are nuclear bombs, but if they being used, there is no need for drones anymore

    • @dx-ek4vr
      @dx-ek4vr 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      IIRC, most of all our Military electronics are already hardened against EMP

  • @renacampos5837
    @renacampos5837 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    Imagine a global community where conflicts are resolved through dialogue, understanding, and cooperation. Imagine the resources, energy, and creativity that could be redirected toward progress, innovation, and enhancing lives. It's a vision that ignites hope and inspires the best in us.

    • @dakrisht
      @dakrisht 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      It’s fun to imagine things. But not close to reality.

    • @flightevolution8132
      @flightevolution8132 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why imagine something that will NEVER happen and is fundamentally against human nature? Waste of time.

    • @kutter_ttl6786
      @kutter_ttl6786 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      BOOOOORRRRIIING!

    • @willdejong7763
      @willdejong7763 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      The people of Cambodia were like that. Peaceful. Trusting. How did that work out? Pol Pot handed out machine guns to the least educated and most brutal of the people he could find and it all came to an end. Millions died.
      At the collapse of the Soviet Union, Ukraine had a bunch of nuclear weapons and gave them to Russia with the promise that Russia would never invade. Do you think that Russia would have invaded if Ukraine still had their nuclear arsenal? How many dead Ukrainians and Russians, killed in the current conflict, would still be alive now?

    • @TheScreamingFedora
      @TheScreamingFedora 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@willdejong7763cool of you to omit the part where first the US dropped more bombs on Cambodia than any other nation in history for literally no reason.
      OP meant pursuing peace when you are in a position of power btw. Have a big stick but try not to use it. Instead of using it for political reasons like every administration ever has done.

  • @HiAndyDog
    @HiAndyDog 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    "Without putting people at risk", yeah, right

    • @PatrickPierceBateman
      @PatrickPierceBateman 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He means without putting Americans at risk, but of course there will be unintended casualties down range, probably a few schoolchildren, no big deal.

    • @patefreeman1106
      @patefreeman1106 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      People we like.

  • @rustyyb8450
    @rustyyb8450 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    It's a single use interceptor for what's likely to be a swarm attack. Even if the swarm isn't, ALL AT ONCE, dealing with many attackers by way of a single use device just doesn't get the job done unless you lug a great quantity; a requirement for offensive. Should intercept with detachable metal net bag that allows the interceptor to fight again. OR, possibly a towed proximity activated warhead.

    • @MR-backup
      @MR-backup 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Just one EMP weapon, and your swarm has turned into an electronics graveyard.
      I would argue these "weapons" are more suited for single use interceptor, you mentioned.

    • @JacobJoesph
      @JacobJoesph 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MR-backup Yeah but they can just cover the devices in copper so the emp doesn't affect it. The same thing can also be said about metal nets Because they can just put a guard on the fans of the device to prevent anything from damaging it.

  • @itamars5911
    @itamars5911 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    "The US military likes to buy things. The whole contract mechanism is designed to buy things..."

    • @novemberalpha6023
      @novemberalpha6023 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yes... And based on the "use & throw" Principles

    • @Beavereaver
      @Beavereaver 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      She was making the point that they don’t see software as being a thing but that they should.

    • @itamars5911
      @itamars5911 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Beavereaver Which is also nonsense. Since every fighter jet and every radar is heavily dependent on software. And i believe that the "contract mechanism" has taken this fact into acccount

  • @arisilburt7170
    @arisilburt7170 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    5:24 gotta love how the CEO messes up the counting on his right hand lol… WSJ you couldn’t have done another take??

  • @johnl.7754
    @johnl.7754 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    Wish them luck in shaking up the hugely wasteful Defense industry

    • @raquetdude
      @raquetdude 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Not with a tech sector approach … tech sector has been incredibly wasteful and is literally awful when it comes to finance, remember Oculus got major of its funding/tech from HTC and Valve.
      The tech sector business model is awful, what’s needed is for monopolies to be broken up is all and for European / Japanese / Korean / Australian companies to be allowed to work with the USA easier.

    • @Sanyu-Tumusiime
      @Sanyu-Tumusiime 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Why would we let Europe Korea and Australia work with us? Their technology is LOW TECH and they're decades and decades behind. We don't need to work with them. We simply need to unleash American innovation.
      It is the people of the United States that make this country so great. If we simply unleash our own people, we will be able to produce new things that you could never have imagined. America has a great population, just believe in our own people.
      @@raquetdude

    • @sterlingmarshel6299
      @sterlingmarshel6299 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@raquetdude We don't need second-rate countries controlling our tech. The U.S leads in tech full stop

    • @lilblondeboy4142
      @lilblondeboy4142 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Sanyu-Tumusiimenah those country are leading players in many sectors.

    • @anh-quanle4399
      @anh-quanle4399 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Sanyu-Tumusiime South Korea has made quite good tanks and automated gun system for border protection

  • @Tommy1977777
    @Tommy1977777 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The lady commenting about the military liking to buy "things" is correct:
    Design a training PROGRAM for the military. This would allow mass production of spec ops.

  • @crashcrain
    @crashcrain 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +127

    The next Arms program will be small, inexpensive drone swarms that utilize AI to not only seek out and find targets, but proceed on their own to destroy them. Imagine a square mile completely protected by a small number of drones that will protect that entire Battlefield with no needed human input? Now Imagine a port or a coastline with that ability, or a whole city?

    • @GaminHasard
      @GaminHasard 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Indeed.

    • @fanaticcoder3320
      @fanaticcoder3320 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      EW entered the chat.

    • @Funktastico
      @Funktastico 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      you mean skynet ?

    • @jamisonmunn9215
      @jamisonmunn9215 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When I see it tried on the USA border I will believe it. Shut the border with autonomous drones.

    • @brentsrx7
      @brentsrx7 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Imagine being a political outsider who is critical of the military industrial complex. Maybe that statement should be passed tense.

  • @jazilzaim
    @jazilzaim 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Amazing to see Palmer Lucky step up to make our country strong! Anduril has been a great innovator in this space!

    • @EDITS_SC
      @EDITS_SC 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      This company has been working with the Royal Australian Navy on the Ghost Shark autonomous sub.

  • @VEC7ORlt
    @VEC7ORlt 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    If the title ends with a question - answer is no.
    Law of headlines.

  • @johnsmith803
    @johnsmith803 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This is actually going to have profound effects on warfare

  • @mookfarr
    @mookfarr 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    "Palantir" now "Anduril."
    What's, next? "Narsil" the missile-maker?

  • @PhilEnea
    @PhilEnea 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We can only hope Thx Lucky

  • @notmyburner3225
    @notmyburner3225 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    It seems that their strategy embraces the idea of technology that can be deployed at scale & is attritable.
    Really liked the slight diss towards the DoD's COIN procurement. I wonder if these guys make portable EW systems and or systems akin to FPV's & Lancet drones?

    • @jamesharding3459
      @jamesharding3459 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I doubt it. Why sell a handful of

    • @notmyburner3225
      @notmyburner3225 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jamesharding3459 Why not do both? EW is extremely profitable, especially if you can make it attritable. Considering how prominent FPV's & drones are in warfare now, portable & attritable EW is likely going to be something sought out.

  • @DeleLang
    @DeleLang 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Fun fact, Anduril is from JRR Tolkien's Lord of the Rings saga. It was the sword used to cut off Sauron's finger and was later given to Aragorn to finish the business.

  • @Rheault101
    @Rheault101 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    Anduril and Palantir together is the futur of defense.

    • @Casyfill
      @Casyfill 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      And the ring

    • @geargeekpdx3566
      @geargeekpdx3566 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      OK Thanks Mr Frodo

    • @TadeuszM
      @TadeuszM 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And your future society/open prison

    • @BuddyGorey
      @BuddyGorey 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @JenReynolds880dumb bot? What the

    • @BuddyGorey
      @BuddyGorey 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @LaureanoSantandervery dumb bot

  • @theonidas
    @theonidas 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

    glad to see Trinity provide such powerful performance once again. im sure she misses the matrix 😂

    • @marcusoutdoors4999
      @marcusoutdoors4999 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I thought exactly that, I couldn’t take her seriously, someone needs to have a quiet word to save her from her ego

    • @chirstophersjohnson
      @chirstophersjohnson 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@marcusoutdoors4999 can you point to an attitude or quote from her in this video where you would have also said that about a man? I mean the CEO was wearing a Return of the Jedi-themed Hawaii shirt featuring Ewoks and yet you're commenting on her attire and questioning whether to take her seriously?

    • @marcusoutdoors4999
      @marcusoutdoors4999 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I would absolutely say that about a man who was for example dressing up as Neo. It’s worth looking at her bio, a typical academic who has delivered little or nothing of value, and has engaged in questionable work in light of the Twitter files. As for the flowery shirt and the ill advised facial hair, I’m guessing that it is a useful distraction from the fact that he’s deploying his massive genius in creating weapons of death. But I’m OK with both his attire and his work as it is sadly necessary work. @@chirstophersjohnson

    • @oStealthKiller
      @oStealthKiller 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They should watch the scene in Sicario where Josh Brolin is rockin sandals lol

    • @SafetyLucas
      @SafetyLucas 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Her eyes look alien

  • @iamM4SK
    @iamM4SK 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    fun fact! Andúril is named after the sword in Lord of the Rings. its elvish for "flame of west" and "sword reforged" both titles are very well suited!

    • @Kenanhower
      @Kenanhower 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I was waiting for someone to reference this. Took far too much scrolling

    • @KlausBahnhof
      @KlausBahnhof 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The name isn't well suited at all. Tolkien hated war.

  • @Sub0x-x40
    @Sub0x-x40 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    imagine having to live deep underground as millions of drones hunt anything with two legs

  • @willcall9431
    @willcall9431 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I can imagine it’s much more difficult to operate in the current global environment than it was for Lockheed and Boeing when they started out.

  • @cantstopiran
    @cantstopiran 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Iran is genius in creating low cost very effective weapons.

  • @TriphexCorporation
    @TriphexCorporation 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    This company is extremely interesting to us. We will be keeping an eye on Anduril during its IPO.

  • @paulrinehart4262
    @paulrinehart4262 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This company is headed in the right direction.

  • @sambatterman8897
    @sambatterman8897 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Original Tacit Rainbow concept that Northrop messed up in the 1980s being picked up 30 years later with cheap sensors, better software and a great business model.

  • @chavdarnaidenov2661
    @chavdarnaidenov2661 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The motive "Make it more expensive, to increase the profit" holds for small newcomers, too. It also holds for the client - the military top brass. They will get lucrative consulting jobs a few years after pushing through any new weapons system or a new order for ammunition.

    • @nomad640
      @nomad640 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did you know all military procurement have a limit on how much profit you can make from each product ? You didn't know it do you? Of course you dont.

    • @nomad640
      @nomad640 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They got lucrative job because engineer is neither soldier or Commander. They need an ex officer to explain what the military currently need, and would potentially need in the future. It isn't that complex

    • @chavdarnaidenov2661
      @chavdarnaidenov2661 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are more insistent than convincing. Objective "Limits for profits" are possible only if the products do not change qualitatively for decades. Profit, as a rule , is some percentage of the final sales cost. So, the way to increase profit is to increase that cost. And this is done by increasing the expenses in R&D, production and maintenance. Methods are: outlandish ideas, overengineering, complex maintenance etc etc.@@nomad640

    • @chavdarnaidenov2661
      @chavdarnaidenov2661 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nomad640"Of course you dont.". Of course I don't. :) The profit motive is at the basis of capitalism.

  • @kyotra
    @kyotra 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    If it undermines the bloat tied to the current system then I'm all for it.

  • @EdwardKeefe
    @EdwardKeefe 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As a person that followed Oculus... he did not "first find success" when Facebook bought them, that was when he first got his bag of cash. Oculus was already the premier VR headset and they were revolutionizing or i should say... creating the entire VR market.

  • @ges8790
    @ges8790 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    The people who keep pushing never ending wars.

  • @ThreeWishes777
    @ThreeWishes777 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Remember this guy. Good to see him thriving.

  • @ChevyRob313
    @ChevyRob313 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    We need more businesses and ceos like this that push industry and influence while thinking outside the box of standard templates for invention

    • @jhaduvala
      @jhaduvala 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      NO...we don't.

  • @ash38287
    @ash38287 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yes. Anduril is not competing with existing Primes and their market will remain largely unperturbed by Anduril, at least in the short-medium term. What it seems to be doing is creating a new market (or, perhaps better, reconstructing the boundaries of the existing one). Very smart, Mr. Luckey. I'd be interested to learn where his engineering talent comes from.

  • @Kellethorn
    @Kellethorn 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Anduril, Aragorn's sword from the Lord of the Rings, literally means "The Flame of The West".
    While a very cool name for a Western defense manufacturer, given Tolkien's view on imperialism, I wonder how he would feel about Anduril being associated with propping up US imperial interests abroad.

    • @KlausBahnhof
      @KlausBahnhof 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Tolkien will be turning in his grave. The lack of self-awareness on the part of this death merchant is mind-blowing.

  • @adamhodgson8851
    @adamhodgson8851 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Listen to this man!

  • @minenation5156
    @minenation5156 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Rise of terminator? Jokes aside... autonomous defense systems are in rise and i feel it can be seen to drive the slowing defense industry.

    • @kevinjenner9502
      @kevinjenner9502 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      “Pentagon fails audit for sixth year in a row” Reuters 11/15/23

  • @NC.237
    @NC.237 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    God bless America 🇺🇸
    Bravo 👏

  • @CantThinkofaCoolOne
    @CantThinkofaCoolOne 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Palmer must be quite the exceptional man. All the best to the guy.

  • @dondouglass6415
    @dondouglass6415 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    This seems like a brilliant business model. I really hope it breaks the mold of what is on offer at the moment. Please, can the UK have a company like this!!?

    • @123Andersonev
      @123Andersonev 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      no and it's pointless anyway because as soon as it fills a void it will get bought up by one of the main players.

  • @alexquevedo831
    @alexquevedo831 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This guy is an American asset hope they are guarding him

  • @Kurzula5150
    @Kurzula5150 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Palmer Luckey is what you get if you mix The Dude Lebowski with Walter Sobchak.

    • @AmazingJayB51
      @AmazingJayB51 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Reminds me of Syndrome form the Incredibles movie.

  • @phillipkarpowich3437
    @phillipkarpowich3437 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    THIS is what Ike warned about. Military Industry + Tech Elites = The End.

  • @tommcclelland119
    @tommcclelland119 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I’m an old Veteran that’s been a contractor in the environmental industry for 40+ years. Most of our core business is federal contracts. It’s a breath of fresh air to witness the emergence of these kind of government contractors. Their process, and their products are off the hook.

  • @harmonk8012
    @harmonk8012 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's good to be Team America!

  • @carloscampo9119
    @carloscampo9119 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Contractor concentration and the death of competition in the Defense sector, alognside with VERY misplaced incentives as laid out here by the Anduril Co-founder, put the capability and strength of the entire Western defense sector at risk, when competitors are challenging democracy and showing ever more capabilities.

  • @JAKphoenixify
    @JAKphoenixify 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Buy.... Things. Truly inspirational

  • @joelx77
    @joelx77 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This is basically an Anduril ad.

    • @erniea5843
      @erniea5843 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      WSJ is a known warmonger. I used to subscribe and half of their headline stories were about China, Russia, Iran, etc.

  • @Burnenwhysee
    @Burnenwhysee 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why dont you make videos about the UAP disclosure issue? it relates to this.

  • @AndrewSmith-dk7qt
    @AndrewSmith-dk7qt 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    5:21 This man said “we live in a world where 80% of weapons procurement goes to just 5 companies” and holds up 3 fingers 💀

    • @stevetennispro
      @stevetennispro 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      And corrected himself... a fraction of a second later. Palmer speaks and thinks very fast. IMO small inconsequential mistakes like that are only interesting to small inconsequential minds.

    • @grammar_shark
      @grammar_shark 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@stevetennispro It's still funny, calm down.

  • @closingtheloop2593
    @closingtheloop2593 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2:42 exactly. As someone who works in big defense, there is no system to dev better software like they are doing at Anduril. Im sold. Job app submitted.

  • @hdtravel1
    @hdtravel1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    These are some very cool high tech weapons - good to have in our arsenal - nice story

  • @Miamcoline
    @Miamcoline 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They're absolutely right about where we should be looking to the future of weapons tech: low cost, reliable, expandable, mass-produceable, rapidly-scalable.
    And they're absolutely right, a huge problem with defence contractors is that they build these horrendous overbudget, way over schedule, frankenstein systems that are designed to do everything and fit every requirement and end up working for none or have huge operating costs and development/production timescales. And end up actually being behind on technology and needing to scramble to retrofit new tech or worse, start from scratch. That is why its crucial that companies take the risk to develop their own product offerings. And trust me, if you build it, they will come.

  • @arkitect156
    @arkitect156 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    One if the main problems we need ti tackle is that the government usesna few exclusive companies and they basically charge whatever they want. One company chargus us almost 80,000 dollars for a chip thsts conventionaly only a couple Thousand at most. It's insane

    • @yougetaspear7799
      @yougetaspear7799 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's massive corruption pure and simple

  • @frisk151
    @frisk151 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Super cool company!!! Glad Fkbook got rid of him so he didn't get bogged down in that culture and oversight! Definitely a Palmer Luckey fan!

  • @Dudevegaslv
    @Dudevegaslv 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Anduril will make the benchmark for all the other military contractors to think about how they are doing business and spend more money on new technology!

    • @jonathanjacob5453
      @jonathanjacob5453 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So you think the people lining their pockets will just step to the side?

  • @Overworkedandunderpaid
    @Overworkedandunderpaid 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It’s a very good approach to the work.

  • @circlelabs
    @circlelabs 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Palmer is not polarizing. He just thinks for himself unlike much of the tech industry.

  • @TalbotHook
    @TalbotHook 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    "Perilous to us all are the devices of an art deeper than we possess ourselves."
    Tolkien, not a pacifist, would've likely **hated** this deeply inappropriate use of the name Andúril, meaning Flame of the West. AI devices complicate war ethically, and I'm certain there aren't many philosophers currently working at Anduril . . . a more fitting name would've been Grond, which was Morgoth's mace.

  • @simonrigg8391
    @simonrigg8391 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    I very much doubt Tolkien would approve of being associated with the military industrial complex.

    • @nicewall8311
      @nicewall8311 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The whole point of Anduril is NOT being the military industrial complex, though.

    • @BuddyGorey
      @BuddyGorey 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@nicewall8311how’s that work

    • @1Dylan1
      @1Dylan1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@nicewall8311 I don't think you understand what you typed.

  • @lindaj5492
    @lindaj5492 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Is anyone else noticing the name Anduril is from LOTR?

  • @marcusoutdoors4999
    @marcusoutdoors4999 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Genuinely impressed and thank god the US is getting its act together. My only concern is what happened when their system is hacked be a bad actor which may be an AI and the weapons are redirected towards us? Not a Teminator conspiracy theorist, a genuine question, how specifically can we protect against this?

    • @oStealthKiller
      @oStealthKiller 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most advanced software software and chip development/developers is a good start (this company has an inside track on the talent pipelines that are that level (national security) and know what it takes to recruit them). There are a number of more detailed tools these people/process would create, but it boils down to having the best people/system/funding in place, which anyone entering that sphere would be fully aware of and planning for (like this company with proven assets and multibillion dollar resources).

  • @jarrettbobbett5230
    @jarrettbobbett5230 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    solid video

  • @Manselus-c1f
    @Manselus-c1f 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +348

    What are the best strategies to protect my portfolio? I've heard that a downturn will devastate the financial market, so I'm concerned about my $200k stock portfolio.

    • @Theodore454
      @Theodore454 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are strategies that could be put in place for solid gains regardless of economy situation, but such execution is usually carried out by an investment specialist

    • @Matthew-mb6oy
      @Matthew-mb6oy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I've been in touch with a financial analyst ever since I started investing. Knowing today's culture The challenge is knowing when to purchase or sell when investing in trending stocks, which is pretty simple. On my portfolio, which has grown over $900k in a little over a year, my adviser chooses entry and exit orders

    • @nalivkin-ls3pg
      @nalivkin-ls3pg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mind if I ask you to recommend this particular coach you using their service? Seems you've figured it all out.

    • @Matthew-mb6oy
      @Matthew-mb6oy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ANGELA LYNN SCHILLING' is her name. She is regarded as a genius in her area and works for Empower Financial Services. She’s quite known in her field, look-her up.

    • @nalivkin-ls3pg
      @nalivkin-ls3pg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for this tip. It was easy to find your coach. Did my due diligence on her before scheduling a phone call with her. She seems proficient considering her resume.

  • @nicholas7578
    @nicholas7578 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "The defense industry is confined to 5 main contractors. Andurial, So we buy up smaller companies"

  • @semtex6412
    @semtex6412 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    did you know Anduril Industries started out six years ago when they teamed up with Palantir Technologies? i sense something went on with their talks - but the language is that of Mordor which i will not utter here.

  • @21stchill18
    @21stchill18 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I would love to work for companies like this. I like how the US splurge on "things" even when they are already dominating. US as a country, is smart, and I love that.

  • @Dikdusa
    @Dikdusa 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Another consideration is training for some of these systems, think about how much it costs to train a pilot, not only just from a cost perspective but time as well.

    • @MrSailor7x
      @MrSailor7x 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We’ve been trying to do unmanned combat since the Eisenhower administration because of cost and moral hazard. Francis Gary Powers really hit hard.

    • @oStealthKiller
      @oStealthKiller 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They said their goal is to buck the traditional trend with more advanced military hardware where user experience was typically made more difficult due to innovation that increased specialized training to operate it by making the software to operate the system extremely easy to use. A crude allegory would be training time to use a rifle vs to understand and identify tactics to use in real time in new/varied environments; their goal is for the operator to need the equivalent training investment for its use as the firearm training in the previous situation.

  • @muddwhistle7833
    @muddwhistle7833 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He’s doing pretty well so far

  • @JosedeJezeus
    @JosedeJezeus 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Our ignorance is on FULL DISPLAY when we kill each other in War.
    We are so ignorant, so barbaric.
    We have a lot to learn about our place in the Universe.

  • @ryanburbridge
    @ryanburbridge 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Funny that this pops up. I was just at their facility in Costa Mesa this week. Interesting

  • @mtrest4
    @mtrest4 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    He should call his product....
    *Luckey Strike* 🚬

    • @daveyhu
      @daveyhu 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      underrated

  • @carlross-works630
    @carlross-works630 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I really think we need an ethical debate on the use of autonomous weapon systems. Especially around lethality decisions. Do you want a robot deciding when to shoot.

  • @baderFaisal869
    @baderFaisal869 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Anyone notice when Palmer said in 5:24 "Eighty percent goes to 5 companies" then proceeds to make a figure for four instead of five😂

    • @handlemonium
      @handlemonium 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      From Oculus to killer drones.