The Fifth Element, which was released around the same time, has notably superior visual effects. The 5th element budget: U$90 million. Lost in Space: U$80 million.
I enjoy Battlefield Earth and Water World as well. I said it. There’s a scene in this lost in space where Penny is recording a vlog complaining about her life or something and I remember thinking “pfff that’s stupid, nobody would use the internet for that”. Welp.
This movie accidentally predicting TH-cam culture is just about the funniest thing about it to me. It's such a random detail for a movie as silly as this one to get right
I love this movie and couldn't understand why it wasn't more popular. Much like your channel, I recently discovered it and love your takes on a wide variety of topics, and don't understand why you don't have a lot more subscribers.
Thanks! In all honesty I suspect my broad approach to this channel is a factor in less people seeing it - not sticking to one niche can apparently be an issue, something something algorithm
I saw this film in theater opening week with my Grandfather. I was 9 at the time, but it was by no means my first film. Jurassic Park was my first, opening day at age 5. They even gave you an actual piece of fossil before entering the theater. I still love this film. I love the production and design especially. The Jupiter II's design was truly novel, and I honestly think there was a little Millennium Falcon inspiration with it being asymmetrical and offset. The robot is also brilliant. A lot of films from this period have the spastic-tonality issue. I mentioned Jurassic Park because that's another film where SGi(Silicon Graphics Inc) was featured prominently. SGi designed the computers that all 3D and CGI was pioneered on. They were used to make almost any movie with a lot of CGI before the mid 2000's. They also designed the Nintendo64's chips, and even the Playstation's graphics were based on their MIPS architecture. All of those video games were designed with their machines as well. Their machines ran IRIX operating system(type of UNIX Lex uses in Jurassic Park) and the cheapest models in the late 1990's would cost you around $50,000 USD.
Another missed bit: Jonathan Harris was asked to play Smith's boss, but refused on the basis that he "doesn't do cameos". So Edward Fox did it instead, and, probably did a better job. Years back, I think I counted at least 22 different episodes referenced in the film. Insane! A couple years back, I got the TV series on DVD. I was so much looking forward to seeing it again after decades-- "EVEN THE REALLY STUPID ONES." What surprised the hell out of me-- was HOW MUCH I enjoyed it-- "EVEN THE REALLY STUPID ONES". Seriously. Season 1 was way better than even I remembered. But season 2, I enjoyed more than I would have believed possible. In fact, there wound up up being only a tiny handful of episodes I found irredeemable (and "The Great Vegetable Rebellion" wasn't even close). Most of the dumbest ones tended to have some real heart in the writing somewhere, and I found myself thinking, if this had been run on Saturday mornings, people would think of it as the BEST-written kids' show ever. (For the record, the ones I rank AT THE BOTTOM were "Princess of Space" with Arte Johnson, "Mutiny In Space" with Ronald Long, and both episodes with Vinita Marcus, "Wild Adventure" and "The Girl From The Green Dimension". My God, even "West of Mars", "The Questing Beast", "Space Vikings" and "A Day At the Zoo" turned out to have some really good scenes mixed in with the lunacy. And you know what? Jonathan Harris really impressed me for how good an actor he could be, with decent material. The real problem was Irwin Allen allowing Harris to write his own material, and never ever telling him he'd gone too far. On the other hand, I also realized, for many scenes to work, Harris must have ALSO been writing The Robot. And once The Robot had a nervous breakdown and developed a human personality (in "War of the Robots"), he ALWAYS got the best lines in any given story. So Harris was giving Dick Tufeld the BEST LINES. Yes. Smith & The Robot were the ABBOTT & COSTELLO of the show.
22 episodes? That definitely confirms my suspicion that Goldsman was a massive fan of the show. Now if only the director had been on the same page... Incidentally I did know about Harris refusing to come back for the movie. That interview he did where he said "I've never done a walk on part and I'm not starting now" seemed to be a bit of an ego trip to me, but he was also delighted by Oldman's performance if that interview he did on Conan is anything to go off so who knows. I was going to put that in there while discussing missed opportunities, but I ended up leaving it out for reasons now unknown to me.
I am exactly 14 minutes in, and I love this video. Having recently rewatched Lost in Space, I can vouch for everything this man is saying. I do somewhat disagree that Joey is miscast. Though I know that's not a popular opinion at all. However, I did grow up with this movie, saw it in a theater, and have rewatched it numerous times since then, and have never disliked Tribbiani as the character; I just think these people are not being directed to exist in the same movie, so they all seem miscast at various moments throughout film. There's only one scene where they all seem correctly cast, and that's the final scene, when they fly through the planet. Because all they have to do is sit there. There's no dialogue, and the VFX are great. I'd argue that it's where the redesign of the Jupiter shines the most. But no amount of nostalgia can blind someone to the flaws of this movie as was pointed out by Michael in Lo-Fi. And just like our gifted orator, I love the film in spite of its myriad defects, and will one day watch it again.
Thanks for the compliments! And on the topic of LeBlanc, I think as I was editing this and probably a bit during writing too I came more to the conclusion he would have felt less miscast if he'd taken the role far less seriously and gotten on Oldmans level of just having fun with it. However I do have to stand by my words, hence how it's presented here
I quite liked this movie at the time. I still, to this day, spit out Matt LeBlanc's pissed off line "annnnd...the monkey flips the switch" at appropriate occasion.
I agree with pretty much everything you said except I did like the Penny character. I think William Hurt really drags this movie down. No energy, like he didn't want to be there. Jeff Bridges probably would've been a better choice. Not sure why space movies think they need to hit the time travel plot.
You know, I can see the vision. Jeff Bridges can ham it up with the best of them so he'd have definitely understood that this movie is one to be silly in
I'm with YOU! I love watching this movie. I'm crazy for the world design. I can watch the scenes in the lower deck set forever - and I love the big spark plug drive!
As a kid in the 90s, I loved the movie. Years later, looking back, I've become familiar with the concept of "if you love something, you'll acknowledge it's flaws", and by God is Lost in Space `97 flawed to hell and back. It has some pretty cool action scenes, and I really dig the set and prop designs, it has an almost organic, otherworldly feel to it. One thing you touched down on that Nostalgia Critic overlooked was that it was directed by the man who gave us Batman Forever and Batman and Robin, and kudos for pointing out the cameos of many of the former lead actors. As messed up as this movie was, there was some heart in it if they paid to get the original actors.
i like the movie and the series. i never understood why the family allowed smith to babysit penny and will throughout the series. even with the robot there, it was easy to disable the robot.
I grew up watching reruns of the original Lost in Space tv show from the 60s and 70s. This movie logically makes no sense with an incoherent plot and characters that are flat but it does hit most of the themes from the original show albeit in a shallow level of depth. The best part of it was the robot/s, the Jupiter 2 and the soundtrack
The reason that 'Iron Man' helmet is too bad ass for this movie is because it wasn't meant for this movie. It was originally designed for a different film. But then that project was canceled during production, & the helmet was repurposed for lost in Space.
I am a little surprised that you failed to mention that originally Johnathan Harris was offered a cameo role to play Doctor Smith's handler, which he turned down saying the part was too small. That is the reason he is the only, at that time, still alive actor from the original show not to appear.
If there's something I grow (probably over) conscious of when my videos exceed 20 minutes, it's time - specifically, brutally cutting out anything I think of as erroneous information or me yapping for the sake of it. Jonathan Harris being offered a bit role was one such piece of information cut for fear of yapping. And Billy Mumy didn't end up in this movie either after he wasn't offered Older Will. Which is a tremendous shame but I fully stand by his decision there. Harris' "I've never played a walk on part and I'm not starting now!" was pretty iconic too
A giant legion of spiders!, I actually really like this movie, a lot of fun if incredibly cheesy at times, the score is great, the effects though a mixed bag are all a lot of fun, the cast was really good for the most part and the robot is rad as all hell, definitely feels more like lost in Space than the Netflix show that just took some character names and slapped them on some planks of wood and couldent even have the decency of having the robot (arguably the most iconic image from the entire franchise) look even somewhat remotely like the robot (if you like the Netflix show more power to ya, just not my cup of tea)
i think there's only one aspect of your review where we disagree: the hypergate. in the original series, the government has spent millions (if not billions) of dollars making one ship to carry six people to a planet (the trip taking five years, even though the earth is in crisis NOW), where they'd have to establish that people could live there, and then earth could start transporting millions of people, spending quadrillions of dollars on ship after ship after ship. even if they began making larger transport ships with hundreds of freezing tubes, the whole idea seems crazy. the hypergate solves that problem for me. it could have been explained more efficiently, but it was the only new idea that i liked in this movie.
I can understand that, but my big problem is that they spend all their time setting that up then just go back on it right at the end. Left me thinking "OK, so what was the point of all that?"
I grew up on Lost in Space. when the movie came out in theaters there was no way I was missing it. I can safely say that I didn't miss it. the cgi monkey thing was bad. the cgi space spiders were bad. the cgi spider infection was really bad. other than that....sadly, I enjoyed the unsold Robinsons pilot episode better. even the Netflix reboot was better. (it was actually really good.)
Thing about any adaptation of Lost in Space is this: it has BECOME Dr Zachary Smith's Adventures in Space, thanks to the wonderful camp of Jonathan Harris. The series wouldn't have lasted a year without him. He knew that, and he was quick to gain total control over his character and eventually the episodes -- and Irwin Allen was smart enough to let him. The movie tried to tell the story straight while keeping the Dr Smith character, and I'm sorry, but I thought the movie was terrible, and Gary Oldman is one of the reasons why. He's good, but he's not really Dr Zachary Smith, at least not the character we recognize. His version was more like how Dr Smith was intended in the series: as a very monstrous bad guy doing everything to sabotage the trip and discredit the Robinsons. Harris recognized that if he stayed with that character, he'd be dead within two months. Lost in Space the series became this camp classic because of Harris, and doing the movie straight after decades of reruns was a very odd decision - one that simply didn't pay off. Matt LeBlanc never interested me as an actor, and the ladies (Lacey Chabert and Heather Graham) simply didn't fit their parts in my opinion. And the kid who played Will was definitely no Bill Mumy. At least they kept Dick Tufeld as the voice of the Robot, even though I wasn't impressed with the design at all. If you aren't going to have the REAL Dr Smith, you can't have Lost in Space without a couple of "DANGER WILL ROBINSON!" callouts. And the surviving actors except for Harris showed up for cameos. I didn't like the movie at all, but we at least had that. And the new TV series. I didn't get the point of that at ALL. It tried to be serious (I guess), but I really don't get it. I watched a couple episodes when it showed up on DVD, but it seemed to scramble a lot of memories. I didn't get Parker Posey's version of Dr Smith (who isn't really Dr Smith), but I suppose it was a good injoke when Bill Mumy showed up as the REAL Dr Smith. I don't know. I just don't get the new series at all. I don't get what they were trying to accomplish, where they were going, and what they wanted to do. Yes, I haven't seen all the episodes -- thank you, no -- but I have yet to really come up with a reason why I should.
I find I must disagree with you on the 2018 series. For me that was about re centering the Robinson family, and working out how they'd really tick in a lost in space situation. I haven't seen past the first season myself yet, but that far I liked what I saw. The Robinsons - Penny especially - felt like real people in that series. But I do agree, if you're looking for the camp of the 60s series it may seem a little pointless. And I did chuckle at Mumy being the old Smith. It almost makes up for the 1998 movie not using him as Old Will
I dont like or enjoy this movie but somehow ive never stopped thinking about it since it came out... Its awful but somehow not soulless Love how one of the cameos of the original cast consisted of turning her into a gorilla and playing the Intel jingle. So so classy and timeless ... Misguided to say the least...
I used to like this film back when I was a kid and thought it was the coolest thing ever. But as an adult I find it generic and mediocre at best or just straight-up forgettable and boring at worst.
I loved the movie too. I thought Matt was prefect to play Don West. It was also a good choice to give Maureen more recognition
Gary Oldman is a treasure in this movie. He’s so hammy it’s amazing.
The Fifth Element, which was released around the same time, has notably superior visual effects.
The 5th element budget: U$90 million.
Lost in Space: U$80 million.
I enjoy Battlefield Earth and Water World as well. I said it.
There’s a scene in this lost in space where Penny is recording a vlog complaining about her life or something and I remember thinking “pfff that’s stupid, nobody would use the internet for that”. Welp.
This movie accidentally predicting TH-cam culture is just about the funniest thing about it to me. It's such a random detail for a movie as silly as this one to get right
I love this movie and couldn't understand why it wasn't more popular. Much like your channel, I recently discovered it and love your takes on a wide variety of topics, and don't understand why you don't have a lot more subscribers.
Thanks! In all honesty I suspect my broad approach to this channel is a factor in less people seeing it - not sticking to one niche can apparently be an issue, something something algorithm
I saw this film in theater opening week with my Grandfather. I was 9 at the time, but it was by no means my first film. Jurassic Park was my first, opening day at age 5. They even gave you an actual piece of fossil before entering the theater.
I still love this film. I love the production and design especially. The Jupiter II's design was truly novel, and I honestly think there was a little Millennium Falcon inspiration with it being asymmetrical and offset. The robot is also brilliant.
A lot of films from this period have the spastic-tonality issue.
I mentioned Jurassic Park because that's another film where SGi(Silicon Graphics Inc) was featured prominently.
SGi designed the computers that all 3D and CGI was pioneered on. They were used to make almost any movie with a lot of CGI before the mid 2000's.
They also designed the Nintendo64's chips, and even the Playstation's graphics were based on their MIPS architecture. All of those video games were designed with their machines as well. Their machines ran IRIX operating system(type of UNIX Lex uses in Jurassic Park) and the cheapest models in the late 1990's would cost you around $50,000 USD.
Another missed bit: Jonathan Harris was asked to play Smith's boss, but refused on the basis that he "doesn't do cameos". So Edward Fox did it instead, and, probably did a better job.
Years back, I think I counted at least 22 different episodes referenced in the film. Insane!
A couple years back, I got the TV series on DVD. I was so much looking forward to seeing it again after decades-- "EVEN THE REALLY STUPID ONES." What surprised the hell out of me-- was HOW MUCH I enjoyed it-- "EVEN THE REALLY STUPID ONES". Seriously. Season 1 was way better than even I remembered. But season 2, I enjoyed more than I would have believed possible. In fact, there wound up up being only a tiny handful of episodes I found irredeemable (and "The Great Vegetable Rebellion" wasn't even close). Most of the dumbest ones tended to have some real heart in the writing somewhere, and I found myself thinking, if this had been run on Saturday mornings, people would think of it as the BEST-written kids' show ever. (For the record, the ones I rank AT THE BOTTOM were "Princess of Space" with Arte Johnson, "Mutiny In Space" with Ronald Long, and both episodes with Vinita Marcus, "Wild Adventure" and "The Girl From The Green Dimension". My God, even "West of Mars", "The Questing Beast", "Space Vikings" and "A Day At the Zoo" turned out to have some really good scenes mixed in with the lunacy.
And you know what? Jonathan Harris really impressed me for how good an actor he could be, with decent material. The real problem was Irwin Allen allowing Harris to write his own material, and never ever telling him he'd gone too far. On the other hand, I also realized, for many scenes to work, Harris must have ALSO been writing The Robot. And once The Robot had a nervous breakdown and developed a human personality (in "War of the Robots"), he ALWAYS got the best lines in any given story. So Harris was giving Dick Tufeld the BEST LINES. Yes. Smith & The Robot were the ABBOTT & COSTELLO of the show.
22 episodes? That definitely confirms my suspicion that Goldsman was a massive fan of the show. Now if only the director had been on the same page...
Incidentally I did know about Harris refusing to come back for the movie. That interview he did where he said "I've never done a walk on part and I'm not starting now" seemed to be a bit of an ego trip to me, but he was also delighted by Oldman's performance if that interview he did on Conan is anything to go off so who knows.
I was going to put that in there while discussing missed opportunities, but I ended up leaving it out for reasons now unknown to me.
Harris also famously said, “If I don’t play Dr. Smith, then I don’t play!”
I am exactly 14 minutes in, and I love this video. Having recently rewatched Lost in Space, I can vouch for everything this man is saying. I do somewhat disagree that Joey is miscast. Though I know that's not a popular opinion at all. However, I did grow up with this movie, saw it in a theater, and have rewatched it numerous times since then, and have never disliked Tribbiani as the character; I just think these people are not being directed to exist in the same movie, so they all seem miscast at various moments throughout film. There's only one scene where they all seem correctly cast, and that's the final scene, when they fly through the planet. Because all they have to do is sit there. There's no dialogue, and the VFX are great. I'd argue that it's where the redesign of the Jupiter shines the most. But no amount of nostalgia can blind someone to the flaws of this movie as was pointed out by Michael in Lo-Fi. And just like our gifted orator, I love the film in spite of its myriad defects, and will one day watch it again.
Thanks for the compliments!
And on the topic of LeBlanc, I think as I was editing this and probably a bit during writing too I came more to the conclusion he would have felt less miscast if he'd taken the role far less seriously and gotten on Oldmans level of just having fun with it. However I do have to stand by my words, hence how it's presented here
I quite liked this movie at the time. I still, to this day, spit out Matt LeBlanc's pissed off line "annnnd...the monkey flips the switch" at appropriate occasion.
It is a surprisingly quotable movie, that is for sure
I agree with pretty much everything you said except I did like the Penny character. I think William Hurt really drags this movie down. No energy, like he didn't want to be there. Jeff Bridges probably would've been a better choice. Not sure why space movies think they need to hit the time travel plot.
You know, I can see the vision. Jeff Bridges can ham it up with the best of them so he'd have definitely understood that this movie is one to be silly in
Oh, Dude, you nailed it. Bridges is just what this movie needed.
I'm with YOU! I love watching this movie. I'm crazy for the world design. I can watch the scenes in the lower deck set forever - and I love the big spark plug drive!
In spite of its flaws, this movie does have an absolutely astounding music score composed by Bruce Broughton.
As a kid in the 90s, I loved the movie. Years later, looking back, I've become familiar with the concept of "if you love something, you'll acknowledge it's flaws", and by God is Lost in Space `97 flawed to hell and back. It has some pretty cool action scenes, and I really dig the set and prop designs, it has an almost organic, otherworldly feel to it.
One thing you touched down on that Nostalgia Critic overlooked was that it was directed by the man who gave us Batman Forever and Batman and Robin, and kudos for pointing out the cameos of many of the former lead actors. As messed up as this movie was, there was some heart in it if they paid to get the original actors.
i like the movie and the series. i never understood why the family allowed smith to babysit penny and will throughout the series. even with the robot there, it was easy to disable the robot.
I grew up watching reruns of the original Lost in Space tv show from the 60s and 70s. This movie logically makes no sense with an incoherent plot and characters that are flat but it does hit most of the themes from the original show albeit in a shallow level of depth. The best part of it was the robot/s, the Jupiter 2 and the soundtrack
The reason that 'Iron Man' helmet is too bad ass for this movie is because it wasn't meant for this movie.
It was originally designed for a different film. But then that project was canceled during production, & the helmet was repurposed for lost in Space.
Getting another movie's leftovers? That's pretty on brand for this movie tbh
I am a little surprised that you failed to mention that originally Johnathan Harris was offered a cameo role to play Doctor Smith's handler, which he turned down saying the part was too small. That is the reason he is the only, at that time, still alive actor from the original show not to appear.
If there's something I grow (probably over) conscious of when my videos exceed 20 minutes, it's time - specifically, brutally cutting out anything I think of as erroneous information or me yapping for the sake of it. Jonathan Harris being offered a bit role was one such piece of information cut for fear of yapping.
And Billy Mumy didn't end up in this movie either after he wasn't offered Older Will. Which is a tremendous shame but I fully stand by his decision there. Harris' "I've never played a walk on part and I'm not starting now!" was pretty iconic too
A giant legion of spiders!, I actually really like this movie, a lot of fun if incredibly cheesy at times, the score is great, the effects though a mixed bag are all a lot of fun, the cast was really good for the most part and the robot is rad as all hell, definitely feels more like lost in Space than the Netflix show that just took some character names and slapped them on some planks of wood and couldent even have the decency of having the robot (arguably the most iconic image from the entire franchise) look even somewhat remotely like the robot (if you like the Netflix show more power to ya, just not my cup of tea)
i think there's only one aspect of your review where we disagree: the hypergate. in the original series, the government has spent millions (if not billions) of dollars making one ship to carry six people to a planet (the trip taking five years, even though the earth is in crisis NOW), where they'd have to establish that people could live there, and then earth could start transporting millions of people, spending quadrillions of dollars on ship after ship after ship. even if they began making larger transport ships with hundreds of freezing tubes, the whole idea seems crazy. the hypergate solves that problem for me. it could have been explained more efficiently, but it was the only new idea that i liked in this movie.
I can understand that, but my big problem is that they spend all their time setting that up then just go back on it right at the end. Left me thinking "OK, so what was the point of all that?"
I grew up on Lost in Space. when the movie came out in theaters there was no way I was missing it.
I can safely say that I didn't miss it. the cgi monkey thing was bad. the cgi space spiders were bad.
the cgi spider infection was really bad. other than that....sadly, I enjoyed the unsold Robinsons pilot
episode better. even the Netflix reboot was better. (it was actually really good.)
I enjoyed this video more than the movie.
The twist in Lightyear reminded me of the time travel part in this.
@anbusx yeh lightysrvdid quit frankly browed fromthis movie he ut evn kind ripped of intersteller ifvyou ever th toys fromthiscmovie ever
Why the hell were they even ripping off Lost In Space of all movies?
That's what me and my father thought so too
That lightyear was a rip off of lost in space
Thing about any adaptation of Lost in Space is this: it has BECOME Dr Zachary Smith's Adventures in Space, thanks to the wonderful camp of Jonathan Harris. The series wouldn't have lasted a year without him. He knew that, and he was quick to gain total control over his character and eventually the episodes -- and Irwin Allen was smart enough to let him.
The movie tried to tell the story straight while keeping the Dr Smith character, and I'm sorry, but I thought the movie was terrible, and Gary Oldman is one of the reasons why. He's good, but he's not really Dr Zachary Smith, at least not the character we recognize. His version was more like how Dr Smith was intended in the series: as a very monstrous bad guy doing everything to sabotage the trip and discredit the Robinsons. Harris recognized that if he stayed with that character, he'd be dead within two months. Lost in Space the series became this camp classic because of Harris, and doing the movie straight after decades of reruns was a very odd decision - one that simply didn't pay off. Matt LeBlanc never interested me as an actor, and the ladies (Lacey Chabert and Heather Graham) simply didn't fit their parts in my opinion. And the kid who played Will was definitely no Bill Mumy. At least they kept Dick Tufeld as the voice of the Robot, even though I wasn't impressed with the design at all. If you aren't going to have the REAL Dr Smith, you can't have Lost in Space without a couple of "DANGER WILL ROBINSON!" callouts. And the surviving actors except for Harris showed up for cameos. I didn't like the movie at all, but we at least had that.
And the new TV series. I didn't get the point of that at ALL. It tried to be serious (I guess), but I really don't get it. I watched a couple episodes when it showed up on DVD, but it seemed to scramble a lot of memories. I didn't get Parker Posey's version of Dr Smith (who isn't really Dr Smith), but I suppose it was a good injoke when Bill Mumy showed up as the REAL Dr Smith. I don't know. I just don't get the new series at all. I don't get what they were trying to accomplish, where they were going, and what they wanted to do. Yes, I haven't seen all the episodes -- thank you, no -- but I have yet to really come up with a reason why I should.
I find I must disagree with you on the 2018 series. For me that was about re centering the Robinson family, and working out how they'd really tick in a lost in space situation. I haven't seen past the first season myself yet, but that far I liked what I saw. The Robinsons - Penny especially - felt like real people in that series.
But I do agree, if you're looking for the camp of the 60s series it may seem a little pointless. And I did chuckle at Mumy being the old Smith. It almost makes up for the 1998 movie not using him as Old Will
@@michaelinlofi Accepted. I like your analysis on the new series. Maybe I'll give it another chance to take me someday. Thanks.
The actress playing-JUDY-is-GORGEOUS !!! And those-PRETTY-eyes. YUMMY. My eye candy. LOL.
th-cam.com/video/CBP2Vch5zLY/w-d-xo.html
E! Entertainment was hyping this movie all summer for some reason. Many behind the scenes specials etc.
That's hilarious, I wonder why that of all movies was the one they were hyping up
I would assume having a Friends cast member in it helped.
I dont like or enjoy this movie but somehow ive never stopped thinking about it since it came out... Its awful but somehow not soulless
Love how one of the cameos of the original cast consisted of turning her into a gorilla and playing the Intel jingle. So so classy and timeless ... Misguided to say the least...
You don't think the spider-Smith character is awesome? I do
Great video. It got me to subscribe.
Thank you!
I used to like this film back when I was a kid and thought it was the coolest thing ever. But as an adult I find it generic and mediocre at best or just straight-up forgettable and boring at worst.
This is Hilarious!! 😂❤