Or if we could figure out Hydrogen for fuel cells or combustion propulsion. Most of the technological hurdles are building the H2 infrastructure and producing it via renewable and green means of generation. Hydrogen is the most common element in the universe but, it is nearly always bound to something like Oxygen (02) in the form of water. I’m a big proponent of nuclear energy if done right and there is a new technological concept of using the extreme heat of a nuclear power plant to split water in to Hydrogen (H2) and Oxygen (O2). It is called Red hydrogen and would provide huge amounts of Hydrogen fuel completely Carbon free. With new research into safer and renewable Nuclear power generation where spent fuel is re-enriched to be used in a specific reactor again (which significantly lessens the amount of nuclear waste created while also greatly reducing the level of and time of radioactivity of the waste that does remain. Closed cycle nuclear allows for multiple re-enrichments of spent U-235 fuel to be used again and multiple times over in a specific reactor type that already exists and was the norm before changes to the law during the Carter Administration over fears of nuclear waste getting in the hands of terrorist groups or hostile governments but, theses regulations were eventually reversed to allow for the restating of recycled fuel nuclear reactors. Cleo Abram does a great video explaining it all in her ‘The Big Lie About Nuclear Waste,” video. Since hydrogen has such great energy density, if all the infrastructure could be put in place, it would make a great fuel for Aircraft.
Some hybrid will inevitable but hydrogen is not a viable or clean fuel if burnt in air as it produces NOX. Also you need to produce the hydrogen. Lots of advantages to electric motored planes though especially safety, not running engines on the taxiway, less noise, and instant torque from zero rpm. This unfortunately feels like green washing rather than a real endeavour.
The Nitrogen Oxides that result from the burning of hydrogen are incredibly negligible in terms of total emissions as most of it is just water vapor released. Also, just sending it through a H2 fuel cell will only create steam. The more important thing with Hydrogen is building the entire infrastructure necessary for a fueling network and ensuring it is made cleanly and renewably either through electrolysis using energy from solar, wind, hydroelectric, geothermal and then there is something called Red-Hydrogen which uses the heat from a nuclear power plants to spit the water at super high temperatures at up to 2000C. I know people hear nuclear and get scared but one, it is the only carbon-free source of energy generation we have today that is theoretically capable of meeting our energy needs as well as keeping pace with growing future demands. A lot of research has gone into making Nuclear and the storage of waste much safer and less of a problem with companies like OKLO that aims to build fast reactors that could use the spent fuel from conventional nuclear reactors to operate. These fast reactors that actually used to be the norm until the incident at Three Mile Island and the fear that the recycling and re-enrichment of the fuel could more easily place it into the wrong hands. However, this has been overturned and there are now facilities like Argonne National Laboratory, researching fast reactors that utilize re-enriched spent fuel and in the process of doing so, greatly lessens the amount of waste but also the time the waste that is produced would have to be stored. The timescale goes from thousands of years to much less radioactive fuel that when no longer able to sustain a chain reaction in a fast nuclear reactor and thus can no longer be recycled, would only need to be stored for about 1 to 2 centuries. Cleo Abram did a great YT video titled ‘The Big Lie About Nuclear Waste,’ which I highly recommend watching if you wish to learn more about the subject. Anyway, yeah, I think Hybrid drive and fuel sources is what makes the most sense with maybe using the battery during cruise and only have an electrical generating turbine for taking off and landing or whenever it is most efficient to switch between them but, as I said, sending the Hydrogen through a fuel cell to produce electrical energy to drive the Aircraft would probably the most efficient way.
Technically couldn't large aircraft use a dynamo to power electric turbines? Seems like all you'd need is a light enough diesel engine and an efficient dynamo. Turbines are great, but theyll never be fuel efficient.
@@jimj2683 fuel weight massively exceeds engine weight on aircraft. the problem of the energy source being heavier than the propulsion system is the exact issue that battery powered aircraft face. Diesel powered planes are optimal for fuel efficiency.
In the range of 1 MW output, gas turbine engines are about as efficient as diesel engines. In smaller sizes diesels have a clear advantage, and very large diesels that cannot be used in aircraft also have an advantage, but in an airliner the practical choice without an efficiency penalty is gas turbine.
What’s needed is a massive aircraft powered by rubber band props . They can get the passengers & crew to wind them up before the flight & lock them into position ready for take off & flight . This would be green the only air pollution would be the body gases given off by the passengers & crew . No battery’s or fossil fuels needed to power rubber band engines ,or risk of engine fires ,a perfect solution .
but rubber bands wear off quickly and cannot be recycled. I know that modernist greenwasher will point to 100 soon-to-come everlasting rubber nanotechnology, but before such rubber bands are tested in length by the Slingshot Channel, I call your solution a greenwasher wetdream!!!
@@simonz5905 There is plenty of them ,the post workers leave a trail of elastic bands ,every time they go out on their postal rounds . The could be recycled & joined together to power giant rubber band powered aircraft .
Instead of burning hydrogen in a turbine, wouldn't it be more efficient to use a fuel cell to produce the electric power? Fuel cells have an efficiency of 60-80% while gas turbines are between 40-60%.
Burn ethanol. Honeywell announced a new, innovative ethanol-to-jet fuel (ETJ) processing technology that allows producers to convert corn-based, cellulosic, or sugar-based ethanol into sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). Depending on the type of ethanol feedstock used, jet fuel produced from Honeywell's ethanol-to-jet fuel process can reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 80% on a total lifecycle basis, compared to petroleum-based jet fuel.1
Yes, it would be a likely be in practice, unless especially for the traveling consumer for the ultra wealthy, for a majority of those with extreme could only administer morphine. it were to provide a more effective movie with a larger efficacy, efficiency, as those billionaires that built the will likely, to flee to New Zealand. As more purchases are would likely flee from Completed for their initial passport and subsequent medicine to Avoid the Anhedonia. Hybrid electric turbine portion systems have been tested successfully where the electrical turbine helps the plane takeoff and then the two remaining standard jet engines on each side within a cell to handle the majority of the fight. There’s definitely a huge market for something like this in Cities like Chicago and New York as well as Philadelphia
Watching my all my seeds sprout is insane.
Huge battery technology
Hybrid is the only way when it comes to aviation.
(Until battery technology catches up)
“Clean energy?”
Or if we could figure out Hydrogen for fuel cells or combustion propulsion. Most of the technological hurdles are building the H2 infrastructure and producing it via renewable and green means of generation. Hydrogen is the most common element in the universe but, it is nearly always bound to something like Oxygen (02) in the form of water. I’m a big proponent of nuclear energy if done right and there is a new technological concept of using the extreme heat of a nuclear power plant to split water in to Hydrogen (H2) and Oxygen (O2). It is called Red hydrogen and would provide huge amounts of Hydrogen fuel completely Carbon free. With new research into safer and renewable Nuclear power generation where spent fuel is re-enriched to be used in a specific reactor again (which significantly lessens the amount of nuclear waste created while also greatly reducing the level of and time of radioactivity of the waste that does remain. Closed cycle nuclear allows for multiple re-enrichments of spent U-235 fuel to be used again and multiple times over in a specific reactor type that already exists and was the norm before changes to the law during the Carter Administration over fears of nuclear waste getting in the hands of terrorist groups or hostile governments but, theses regulations were eventually reversed to allow for the restating of recycled fuel nuclear reactors. Cleo Abram does a great video explaining it all in her ‘The Big Lie About Nuclear Waste,” video. Since hydrogen has such great energy density, if all the infrastructure could be put in place, it would make a great fuel for Aircraft.
You know hydrogen is naturally occuring unbound in some parts of the world right?
Make it run on ammonia or hydrogen fuel for zero carbon emissions
Setidaknya teknologi ini sangat ramah lingkungan 👍👍
Really good talk with lots Computer generated images!
Please increase your this industry technology advancement please sir please
Some hybrid will inevitable but hydrogen is not a viable or clean fuel if burnt in air as it produces NOX. Also you need to produce the hydrogen. Lots of advantages to electric motored planes though especially safety, not running engines on the taxiway, less noise, and instant torque from zero rpm. This unfortunately feels like green washing rather than a real endeavour.
Burning hydrogen does not produce anything other than water.
@@akshay.kumar.k It produces NOX. The high temperature of combustion causes the nitrogen in the air to combine with oxygen.
The Nitrogen Oxides that result from the burning of hydrogen are incredibly negligible in terms of total emissions as most of it is just water vapor released. Also, just sending it through a H2 fuel cell will only create steam. The more important thing with Hydrogen is building the entire infrastructure necessary for a fueling network and ensuring it is made cleanly and renewably either through electrolysis using energy from solar, wind, hydroelectric, geothermal and then there is something called Red-Hydrogen which uses the heat from a nuclear power plants to spit the water at super high temperatures at up to 2000C. I know people hear nuclear and get scared but one, it is the only carbon-free source of energy generation we have today that is theoretically capable of meeting our energy needs as well as keeping pace with growing future demands. A lot of research has gone into making Nuclear and the storage of waste much safer and less of a problem with companies like OKLO that aims to build fast reactors that could use the spent fuel from conventional nuclear reactors to operate. These fast reactors that actually used to be the norm until the incident at Three Mile Island and the fear that the recycling and re-enrichment of the fuel could more easily place it into the wrong hands. However, this has been overturned and there are now facilities like Argonne National Laboratory, researching fast reactors that utilize re-enriched spent fuel and in the process of doing so, greatly lessens the amount of waste but also the time the waste that is produced would have to be stored. The timescale goes from thousands of years to much less radioactive fuel that when no longer able to sustain a chain reaction in a fast nuclear reactor and thus can no longer be recycled, would only need to be stored for about 1 to 2 centuries. Cleo Abram did a great YT video titled ‘The Big Lie About Nuclear Waste,’ which I highly recommend watching if you wish to learn more about the subject.
Anyway, yeah, I think Hybrid drive and fuel sources is what makes the most sense with maybe using the battery during cruise and only have an electrical generating turbine for taking off and landing or whenever it is most efficient to switch between them but, as I said, sending the Hydrogen through a fuel cell to produce electrical energy to drive the Aircraft would probably the most efficient way.
Technically couldn't large aircraft use a dynamo to power electric turbines? Seems like all you'd need is a light enough diesel engine and an efficient dynamo. Turbines are great, but theyll never be fuel efficient.
Turbines are much lighter than diesel engines, so you can carry more fuel to more than make up for the loss in efficiency.
@@jimj2683 fuel weight massively exceeds engine weight on aircraft. the problem of the energy source being heavier than the propulsion system is the exact issue that battery powered aircraft face. Diesel powered planes are optimal for fuel efficiency.
In the range of 1 MW output, gas turbine engines are about as efficient as diesel engines. In smaller sizes diesels have a clear advantage, and very large diesels that cannot be used in aircraft also have an advantage, but in an airliner the practical choice without an efficiency penalty is gas turbine.
So still uses jet fuel as far as I can see. So it allows the use of hybrid planes, which does sound more sensible than pure battery power.
What’s needed is a massive aircraft powered by rubber band props . They can get the passengers & crew to wind them up before the flight & lock them into position ready for take off & flight . This would be green the only air pollution would be the body gases given off by the passengers & crew . No battery’s or fossil fuels needed to power rubber band engines ,or risk of engine fires ,a perfect solution .
but rubber bands wear off quickly and cannot be recycled.
I know that modernist greenwasher will point to 100 soon-to-come everlasting rubber nanotechnology, but before such rubber bands are tested in length by the Slingshot Channel, I call your solution a greenwasher wetdream!!!
@@simonz5905 There is plenty of them ,the post workers leave a trail of elastic bands ,every time they go out on their postal rounds . The could be recycled & joined together to power giant rubber band powered aircraft .
@@maskedavenger2578 OK.. It obviously works
th-cam.com/video/PJk245qi-PI/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=ProjectAir
Just increasing complexity and introducing more consumer electronics serves companies.
Instead of burning hydrogen in a turbine, wouldn't it be more efficient to use a fuel cell to produce the electric power? Fuel cells have an efficiency of 60-80% while gas turbines are between 40-60%.
All marketing lies
This was FkG 2 years ago 😂
Cargo.
Burn ethanol.
Honeywell announced a new, innovative ethanol-to-jet fuel (ETJ) processing technology that allows producers to convert corn-based, cellulosic, or sugar-based ethanol into sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). Depending on the type of ethanol feedstock used, jet fuel produced from Honeywell's ethanol-to-jet fuel process can reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 80% on a total lifecycle basis, compared to petroleum-based jet fuel.1
Only the very rich will be able to afford to fly ! net zero is a dead end technology few can afford.
Yes, it would be a likely be in practice, unless especially for the traveling consumer for the ultra wealthy, for a majority of those with extreme could only administer morphine. it were to provide a more effective movie with a larger efficacy, efficiency, as those billionaires that built the will likely, to flee to New Zealand. As more purchases are would likely flee from Completed for their initial passport and subsequent medicine to Avoid the Anhedonia. Hybrid electric turbine portion systems have been tested successfully where the electrical turbine helps the plane takeoff and then the two remaining standard jet engines on each side within a cell to handle the majority of the fight. There’s definitely a huge market for something like this in Cities like Chicago and New York as well as Philadelphia
Lol, flying Toyota
Decarbonizing by charging batteries with electricity produced by carbon.. that's a scam.
ใช่เสียงต้องเพราะเหมือนเครื่องบินเจ็ท supersport