Evidence for a Global Flood & Its Importance for Our Times ~ Hugh Owen
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ย. 2024
- For more please visit kolbecenter.org/ & www.foundations...
Walt Brown's Online Book "In the Beginning" -- www.creationsc...
**Donations to Sensus Fidelium is 501(c)3 tax deductible**
🙏🏻PLEASE HELP OUR CHANNEL GROW 🙏🏻
▶️ 1. Become a Channel Patron: / sensusfidelium
▶️ 2. Visit the website www.sensusfide... for Gueranger, Saint of the Day, Apologetics, Meditation by the Saints, Scripture Study and more.
▶️ 3. BitChute --- www.bitchute.c...
▶️ 4. Paypal, Bitcoin, Anedot, Stripe, Square & PO Box donations - sensusfidelium...
▶️ 5. TH-cam: Click Subscribe, then Click "Notification Bell" = 🔔
Please "Like" our videos so that TH-cam shares it to others by clicking the "Like" thumbs-up under the video = 👍🏻
▶️ 6. Please share this video 📲, and help others find Christ inside the Catholic Church! Please share this video on Facebook and Twitter using the share button.
▶️ 7. Follow on Social Media:
🔴 Facebook: / sensusfidelium
🔴 Sensus Fidelium Twitter: / sensus_fidelium
🔴 TH-cam: Click Subscribe, then Click "Notification Bell" = 🔔
Well said Hugh! Now is our duty as Catholics to share the Kolbe Center videos on creation with the rest of mankind who have been also deceived by the Lucifer’s camp. Our Lady of Guadalupe, pray for us sinners who have recourse to Thee. Amen!
I shall need to meet with you in person.- A curious catholic physicist who has long known of the serious gaps in modern physics
Yay, I love the long ones! 💜🙏🌲💓👼
This is mind blowing
The information that you present is so valuable. It would be helpful if you were somehow able to improve the visual quality of your slides. I believe that it would capture the attention of many more people if the visuals were more clearly captivating. So happy that the quality of your sound has improved over the years!
They're only blurry in this particular video, which leads me to believe that it was a problem with the projector they were using rather than a problem with his slides. Here's another version with clearer visuals, but the lecture, while being the same, was a little rushed and some slides were skipped over: th-cam.com/video/Kqp81-VFnxg/w-d-xo.html
Very interesting. I really enjoyed listening to this. Thank you.
This is a great boon to faith.
Fascinating! Can you please elucidate me on how we have eye witness accounts passed down in so many different places if the vast majority of humans died then during the flood? Many thanks for this talk. I had no idea the flood was a part of church teaching.
Barbora- Eye witness? Noah and his family.
Because, all of humanity are descendants of Noah's three sons and the spreading out of humanity after the tower of babel. As the acccount was passed down through the generations in different cultures as they spread out and fell away from the True God, various verisions arose. However, the existence of flood stories from the aboriginals of Canada to Australia, the peoples of Europe, Africa, and Asia bear witness to the fact that there was nearly a universal understanding among 'anicent' man that there was a flood.
Its about time Catholicism is Coming home... they better!!
Because the chief is coming home real soon!!!
St. Paul said the same thing though
I want to watch what ever they “”saw last night” sounds interesting too
I think it is the one about traditional catholic doctrine on creation
@@barborag4359 Thanks!
Was there a global flood, I honestly don't know
But I respect and appreciate the tenaciousness of scholars for not giving up on this hypothesis.
If shown to be a true event, the world will never be the same as it would be an amazing endorsement of the biblical account.
My faith tells me to accept it but I do struggle with the idea that it was global.
I often defend the flood account with atheists by pointing out that the black sea deluge flooded a land mass larger than the republic of Ireland
Yes. Almost all modern scientists even agree there was and they agree on the evidence as well. Atheists and different religions do as well and have a history of it in their cultures history.
Don't be Luke warm brother... believe it or don't.. There was definitely a flood everything we know tells us this except for the main screen who are Anti-Christ
Every word of the Bible is the Word of God. That should be good enough.
The flood was real, as described in scripture.
I know, today's atheists and modernists will bring up all sorts of excuses to convince the world of the opposite... but their claims are always shallow and rarely backed with actual data. Take Bill Nye for example; the guy is *not* a scientist, but an actor hired to _convince_ the masses of the truthfulness of evolution and climate change with his humour. When questioned about (ie.) the percentage ratio between natural and man-made effect on climate change, he never answers, preferring to change the subject instead. This is what we're up against: Propaganda against the truth, as a way to bury one's head in the sand.
If there was no flood, scripture is false. If scripture is false, God doesn't exist. If God doesn't exist, *nobody will condemn their sinful way of life.*
The problem for them is that, -- as seen in this video, and many other places -- in the end, science and archaeology truly gives reason to scriptural accounts. There aren't only physical evidences either, check this out: th-cam.com/video/BIThwuOHrJw/w-d-xo.html
An event as major as the Great Flood would've been remembered by nearly all nations and peoples descending from the few who came from the Ark. *This is exactly what we have.* This, NO ATHEISTS ever focuses on... because sometimes, some evidences put together are so telling, they can't possibly be successfully contradicted. They prefer to leave them in the dark, hoping that nobody would find them.
Trust God, friend.
Water covered *everything.*
There are continent-wide sedimentary rock layers that are uniform across 100s of miles and found on separate continents. Only way that can happen is through massive inundation of water. Remember: the Flood was not merely 40 days of rain. It was actually over a year long. The Bible speaks of the windows of heaven being opened and the fountains of the deep as well. If the sea floor rises and the continents sink, the oceans can completely inundate the land.
Merry Christmas!
Love these presentations. I’m sharing them with everyone I know. Btw W
what’s going on with the microphone in all these videos?
IF YOU LISTEN CLOSELY YOU WILL FIND: THERE IS A GAP IN THE SOUND VERY OCCASIONALLY, BUT LISTEN UP NOW ALL YE NAYSAYERS, THERE IS NO GAP IN THE WORDS THAT SPOKEN AND BRIEFLY INTERRUPTED. JUST A TINY GAP IN THE SOUND, WHICH WHEN IT RESUMES, CARRIES STRAIGHT ON AND NARY A BEAT IS LOST IN ANY WORD OR SENTENCE. WE ARE SO USED TO AN ENTIRE SECTION OF SOUND AND WORD BEING ELIMINATED WHEN WE HEAR GLITCHES SIMILAR TO THIS THAT OUR MIND TELLS US THATS WHAT IS HAPPENING. IT ISN’T IN THIS CASE.
i absolutely believe the Flood was a real occurrence, I am A God fearing, young earth Creationist woman, but I am wondering, if we can explain all of the fossils by the geological evidence of rapid coverage of bodies of animals by the sedimentary layers in rapid sequence, where are there any fossils of the men of that time?
Eviloution is a religion because it takes faith to believe in.
Evolution is the fake religion for feeble minds and the spiritually dead. It is not science, it is a laughable, incoherent, inconsistent, twisted lie.
@Qwerty Empirical knowledge is observable, verifiable knowledge. Evolution is a world view, not science and requires you to believe in a theory which is neither observable nor verifiable. It is a psychological tool used by communists and secular humanists to undermine people's belief in God. Darwinian evolution is the foundational lie of communism, responsible for the deaths of hundreds of millions. God created this world in 7 days, the timelines are fake. The science is not there. The great flood created most geological features they claim is erosion. Dinosaurs are fake. All fake bones encased in lead with fake claims of radioactivity. The only truth is in the Holy Bible.
@Qwerty Every church that has accepted sola scriptura have become compromised, accepting abortion, contraception, homosexual clergy and the list goes on....
The Catholic Church is the ONLY church established by Jesus Christ but sadly infiltrated to the hilt by the Freemasons.
@Qwerty You seem to be falsely claiming that merely accepting the inerrant truth of the Scriptures is sola scriptura. No, sola scriptura is a Protestant doctrine that says the Scripture is the sole rule of faith. The Church has always taught that both Scripture and Tradition are sources of divine revelation. If you are trying to imply that "science" is a source of revelation, you are way way off.
And I'm not sure what your point regarding empirical causality is since evolutionists effectively deny any kind of rational causality, and nothing they claim in terms of their beliefs is empirical. They employ sophistry and pretend that their materialistic/naturalistic philosophy is a given and somehow proves their case. The truth is they rarely even acknowledge that they are smuggling in a godless philosophy under the guise of science so that they can explain origins apart from a creator. They even say that Intelligent Design is somehow ruled out because it's "religion," a claim that makes no sense at all empirically.
@Qwerty The question of origins is NOT non-religious. God has clearly revealed in Scripture that He created all things. The creation story is an essential part of Catholic teaching. It's foundational. In fact, if anyone else tells you they know how and when the universe or life or species came to be, they are teaching what amounts to a false religion. Science is not equipped to answer such questions because it is limited to studying the workings of the natural world through observation and experiment. It is limited to the scientific method, and the very reason all variations of evolutionism as a philosophy have been taught as "science" is because the people making these claims either did not know or did not care about overstepping their bounds and venturing into the realm of philosophy and religion.
Read the Psuedoepigraphical books of Henoch/ Enoch about the flood.
@Qwerty It was once in the Canon of Scripture and has a lengthier version of Noah and the flood and its destruction of cities, etc.. Also the author is taken to the 3rd heaven and sees that the earth is ball that goes around the sun and cannot imagine how people stick to the surface of a ball. He is even more to see planets, galaxies and deep space until all creation is just a small nut sized point of light. Heaven dwarfs any and everything and is beyond imagining. The earliest copy is from 400 bc in Ethiopia.
@Qwerty not canonical but still scripture like many other writings.
The canonical books refer to enoch in many ways and quote parts of the enoch scriptures.
Same as the church investigates all the scriptures, you can do the same, nobody forbits you.
@Qwerty Some were never scripture but still in the canon, but still quoted in what you call scripture.
If Enoch is quoted in the scripture it is scripture and for example the ethiopian church still has enoch in the canon and that church is as apostolic as the roman, same as orthodox has more books in canon than the roman.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_canon
Comparing the codex vaticanus with current day bibles is an example how things develop in what is canon and what isn't and how words are changed, even in what you call scripturefrom the catholic church. That's a fact. Specialy names that have an important meaning. Words like Elohim, Yaweh, Adonai, El, Yah etc etc etc
As I said the canonical books, scripture and non scripture, quote from and refer to books, epistles, letters that are not in the canon.
1 of the many examples colosians 4
And when this letter has been read among you, have it read also in the church of the La-odice′ans; and see that you read also the letter from La-odice′a.
You sound a bit extremist in your opinions.
@Qwerty The armenian church, coptic and many other churches are in communion with the roman, if the apostles went to some place it was to the armenians. Let it be the armenians that have more books in canon than the roman.
Not that difficult is it!
And as I said, nobody forbids you to read other books letters etc etc.
There are many reasons why some are and others are not in canon, some are lost, others contradict, some found many years later hidden in monasteries and tombs etc etc.
But if you want to know why Barnabas is not in the canon, you will have to read it. The church did the same thing, simple!
Many books, letters etc are not lost, the church has them. Because some contradict does not mean all is invented, gnostic based, wrong or whatever.
My opinion is, after 2000 years you will not know better as the early christians or the apostles.
As Paul himself says, For I am the least of all the apostles--I do not even deserve to be called an apostle!
@Qwerty Well I'm saying. If all apostolic churches say the same, it is probably correct.
As far as I can see, none of the apostolic churches have gnostic based writings in the canon.
And enoch is a book that clearly inspired many and quoted many times as you can read yourself in the catholic bible.
Why exactly it''s not in the canon? I don't know. But it would be nice if the church explained the book to avoid all kind of wild alien stories emerging about Enoch.
Do you think that along with the 40 days of rain there might have been a meteor or asteroid hitting an ocean and causing waves several thousand feet tall? How else to explain fossils at the top of high mountains? But then, the ark could only survive 100 ft waves.
Since no access for man or most animals to descend from the top of Mt Ararat, God must have brought them down miraculously. Does that sound reasonable?
👍
thumbs up
+ A.M.D.G. In discussing questions of this kind two rules must be observed as Augustine teaches. The first is TO HOLD THE TRUTH OF SCRIPTURE WITHOUT WAVERING. The second is that since Holy Scripture can be explained in a multiplicity of senses, one should be ready to abandon it IF IT BE PROVED WITH CERTAINTY TO BE FALSE. St Thomas Aquinas Q68 Art.1 Pt.1.
Yes, "IF".
When the flood subsided it had created a completely new surface upon the earth.
New oceans and continents, no countries or human civilisations just 8 people and complete and total destruction. Starting from that point, when were the verses of Genesis written?
It's traditionally believed that Moses wrote Genesis and that the information was handed down to him from father to son going back to Noah and ultimately to Adam in the garden. But Moses was also in contact with God and his writings were affirmed by Jesus (who was God incarnate) so it seems pretty clear that they were of divine inspiration if not origin.
Where can the piece of the ark be found today, missed it due to some sound damping?
Armenia
Please Jesus fix this phone thank you fiat
Has Creationism EVER been defined as an Article of Faith?
No
But it was an article of faith for nearly all of the Church fathers and everyone in the Church for most of its entire history.
We are now living in the days foretold....as in the days of Noah.
There are fossils of animals that apparently died in the flood, are there fossilized remains of the humans that died?
The church Father's teach that they were so wicked that God basically atomized them thur the sheer force of the flood.
Could you give a reference for that teaching of the Church Fathers?
Does the Kobe Institute have suggestions for children’s books that can tell this story in a way that effectively combats the evolution theory that is so ingrained in all of us today?
@@adromano6 check out the channel Genesis Apologetics and their video Noah's flood and Catastrophic...17:00. Plus check out the book Genesis according to the saints.
Yes
MFU
Mudfossil University Channel
40:56
16:10
Would it be two stupid questions if I were to ask: If there ever was such an enormous amount of water on the earth all in a sudden, where would it come from? Where would it be gone, after the flood?
Daniel Rioux the oceans. If the continental plates went down and the oceanic plates uplifted, easy
Well, given that the flood would've been made by God... I think it is fair to assume that the same being capable of creating the universe in 7 days would also be *more than capable* of creating enough water to flood the entire earth, and then removing said water by any natural or unnatural means necessary.
Next to the over- and underground oceans, we've got the arctic poles. I mean I am not saying Al Gore is right or anything but on the other hand you've got people like him that we would have waterworld, if the poles melted so...
And it could work out that something as global as the flood could have triggered an ice age due to the dramatic climate change.
It simple. The Earth is flat. The land was one piece. The water was the Earth splitting continents, opening and gushing water from the ground. The firmament above is filled with water so it also was unleash. If you read the creation in Genesis, you would know how we came to be. But tradition has it the Earth will be destroyed by fire the next time. This time however there won't be time to repent. The flood was a delayed death where people had a chance to repent when they start to drown. But fire is instant and there is no time to feel remorse for our sins.
Oh yeah. Fossil fuels did not come from dinosaurs. Our gas at the pump to run our cars is endless. Scientist do not know where it came from. But it was all agree that it is bountiful.
Yeah I remember when the kangaroos and koalas got off the ark after it finally beached and then they swam all the way to the Australian continent.
oh, beast of h*ll, once more you cannot sneer away the Truth any more than you can sneer away your sin that is bigger than the whole universe.
Wow an eye witness.
If you believe this guy's nonsense, you should be a Young Earth Creationist. The Vatican has said evolution is a reasonable explanation. Only an evangelical moron would believe this horse manure!
@@richardgandolfo9422 The Vatican also said that the traditional explanation is still valid. You see, this is what happens when you take truth down to your level instead of elevating yourself to the truth.
You call this lecture horse manure but I bet you don’t use the same logic when some scientist tells you a b c or d. The truth is modern science is largely Freemasonic and Luciferian. Its objective is not to explain the natural occurrences of the world, as it used to be, by to replace God with The Science TM.
A chain of Eye witness testimony since the flood? We can’t even confirm historically Moses existence , how can that even be??
Daniel Pereira an undisturbed chain of eye witness testimony? What are you talking about
Humans. Are you special??
You obviously misunderstand his point about eyewitness testimony. Also, in regards to Moses' Historicity, we have the testimony of God's infallible and inerrant Scriptures and the testimony of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. Scholars use to claim Pontius Pilate wasn't real as well as many other people mentioned(they were proven wrong and will be time and time again) in the Bible because they are materialists and unjustly presuppose that the Bible is unreliable because it mentions the supernatural and they don't believe in the supernatural. Archaeology always supports biblical claims, science as well. Evidence doesn't speak for itself but rather is filtered through a person's worldview, this is why Atheists make claims about the Bible's unreliability using so-called evidence when the evidence doesn't even support their claims or dismiss evidence supporting the Bible due to their unjust unbelief in the supernatural. I'll explain what he meant about eyewitness testimony if you like.
@@Michael-fn2rc Thank you I might have missed what he said before, I'll play it again. In my experience arguing for creation, science does not support biblical claims. Everyone brings up evolution 99% of the time. Can you elaborate on what your trying to say about science?
@@Michael-fn2rc Its difficult to argue we came from adam and eve, without just having to say, well we just believe it because we do. We have to do that for creation, and we have to do that with moses, and we have to do that with Christ's teachings such as the Eucharist. Everyone calls it mythology and that drives me insane. Today i was told Nature has no purpose, neither do individuals, i couldn't believe it. I want to prove it but the more i try the more it leads me to having to accept it cannot, and I either have to believe it or not. Ever since i started my Ignatius Spirtual Excercise classes i think I've been under heavy attack. I wanted to learn more about the arguments against my faith so i can better defend it and I've been drowning in some quicksand lately
Frightening title.
What is so frightening about it?
@@KMF3 The part about "how it relates to our times" 🤣 Ominous.
Flat Earth??
What???
@@KMF3 Bible says the Earth doesn't move.
@@hardcorejab where?
@@KMF3 ?
@@KMF3 You want me to tell you where in the bible where it says the Earth is fixed and immovable?