Excellent..... Distinguished Dr Hamarhoff has beautifully , elegantly , boldly explained his views which are supported by several noble laureates including renowned noble laureate Distinguished Dr Brian Josephson ( claims ESP 99% accuracy ) , renowned scientists and philosophers , scholars , medical doctors ...it is also supported by 2 billion Hindus and Buddhist (vedanta etc. ) who believe nonlocal is fundamental... thanks 🙏.
When he said "plants can do it", i.e, quantum effects in macro warm wetware biology, he needs to be careful what people are actually saying, in the emerging field of quantum biology. Evolution maybe able to engender additional marginal advantages, using quantum effects, on top of a largely classical system, for greater efficiencies in photosynthesis. It's still largely a local event, within the chloroplasts. Same with other effects, such as enhanced enzymatic reactions. They are not talking about long range entanglements.
By current evidence based understanding, Synchronicity most probably is some kind of psychological bias. Things like the frequency illusion, Baader-Meinhoff phenomenon, confirmation bias, etc.
According to Carl Jung synchronicity is due to the fact that ideas that are similar or related to each-other have a sort of "magnetic pull" and tend to attract each-other. At the macro level that is translated as 2 events having a common meaning (or common denominator) tend to attract each other. Such as you thinking of your neighbor's mad dog while taking a walk, then you see a dog eating a cat, etc...
Please, in the future, if someone wants to discuss how faster than light communication may possibly be possible with quantum entanglement, _let them!_ Why not at least give him a chance to explain his ideas?
This is what irks me about Kuhn. On one hand he gives these ideas a platform which many might not do, but he can't seem to help letting his bias come through as talks all over the interviewee. It doesn't seem very professional.
I experienced it on a high level there is something mystical.I saw an entity you can call it divine or power or ...but yes this power exists everywhere beyond this world.Synchronicity is a way of this power to talk to us
First time Stuart makes a little sense to me, even though only in metaphysically possibilities. Although still you cannot transfer information like Robert Lawrence says, except 'collapsed state' versus 'uncollapsed state'. And how on earth are our brains entangled?
You can, indeed, transfer some information in a tricky way. The result of the "collapse" depends on what kind of measurement is performed, so you can still use inference to indirectly transmit some kind of "clue" of what's being done. It's a tricky process but it works. And if you make this process complex enough, with enough variables, I'm pretty sure that you'd be able to "transfer" almost any kind of "message".
Beauty, truth, cupidity, equality, time are these aspects of the world or aspects of ourselves. Can we disentangle ourselves from the world? Can we disentangle truth from correctness, synchronicity, time? How? By proposing another aspect another measurement? I suspect we can not disentangle ourselves from the world. Not even by death. Does that mean that we are fundamental to the world or just an aspect? Does it matter? If we found beauty in evil or evil in beauty does that sour the truth or make it more sweet?
Interesting and worthwhile video. Quantum entanglement would be too unstable for macroscopic effects. The must be another mechanism if synchronicity is true, and I'm inclined to believe some legitimate effect is there.
The problem I have is that if all this metaphysical stuff is true, e.g. faster than light travel, sending information to the past, time is an illusion, etc, then why does our reality have any coherency whatsoever?
Some of what you talk about refers to quantum mechanics only. For our reality matter has lost its wave-like properties through decoherence, which make such things impossible.
These phenomena would have a nature and have limits. So the result of them existing is not an end to coherent. They would not lead to randomness nor undo all the ‘normal phenoman’
@@alexandersalamander I guess that's the mental leap I can't get to. Once all these things are available, that's the end of causality and the fundamentals of classical physics. Now, if all these phenomenon are only available in the quatum world and not the classical world, then I guess that's different. But that also tells me that all these classical-defying phenomenon which exist in the quantum world, cannot affect the macroscopic world. It's either one or the other: either you get a universe where nothing is impossible, or you get our world with real limits.
@@saturdaysequalsyouth i suppose as it's briefly mentioned in the video, all the so called quantum effects also happen in classical macro physical world, but our conscienceness selects/préfères only to perceive classical local linear events. I.e. we only perceive one direction of time because our brain has some mécanisme that might give us something like the illusion of free choice or so. As the quantum effects don't affect causal relationships you don't get any disadvantages by sticking to your time arrow.
Synchronicity is real, I think more we understand the meditation and brain, more we will have such events and thought manifestation. I have experienced this spooky Einstein thing first hand. It’s cool stuff.
I developed an actual experimental methodology for that with staggeringly significant results. It was then independently verified by Gary Schwartz at the University of Arizona in his book “Supersynchronicity”. I taught experimental methodology at Emory University and so that’s part of how I developed a way to get quantitative traction on such a subjective idea. Thanks 🙏🏻 ❤️🔥 I reproduce my comment on this video for your perusal. Stuart and I know each other and have some history together too. Here’s what I wrote and included a reference to the book I wrote about the backward in time effect: It would be nice if someone somewhere would read my original papers and my book showing that this “backward in time” effect is the only possible way that brains and universes can possibly exist. We are leaving out half the Universe. I explain how and why and introduce a scientific methodology for demonstrating this which has been independently verified. I used to teach experimental methodology at Emory University and I left graduate school to write the papers and book because the paradigm of brain and mind was fundamentally flawed and paradoxical. It heartens me in the extreme to see this. No one would listen to me all these years and I never caved in or let go because I am right. When everything fits together into a coherent picture, that is a valid epistemological point. No one can say that you put the puzzle together wrong -even if it isn’t complete. I have both experimental evidence AND this total epistemological picture. The reason no one listens is the exact reason Stuart Hameroff says. Even if they want to entertain their own theories, fine. But you cannot avoid the paradoxes and you cannot “fudge” what the connection of mind and matter actually are. Or the mechanism of how they relate to human and universal history. If you merely say “things are not separate” then you have merely embarked upon a journey. Whereas I have been on that journey for a long time. Now, Like Darwin on the Beagle, I am coming home. I am bringing it all together. My second book is nearly complete. I unlock a lot of meaning, a lot of relationships in modern history and technology. My first book is the foundation and mechanics of the backward in time effect. It was called “The Textbook of the Universe: The Genetic Ascent to God” published in 2003 after a couple years traveling around the world presenting papers and my own years of unique research. I keep trying. That’s all I can do. My friends who know me talk about when all the predictions I make come true as “the world catching up”. It would be nice if they would hurry up. I live in my car because I never will give up. It’s not just principle either. This stuff is VITALLY IMPORTANT. I love people and I want them to have a future. Thanks 🙏🏻 for listening if you did. ❤️🔥 And as for a “panacea” of the effect, I would not have even began writing if I did not account for that at the outset. Perhaps that’s why people don’t understand-they are stuck on a lot of paradoxical stumbling blocks which I see as hurdles in my track and field practice. Looking beyond and over hurdles let’s you see the air above them where you can fit through. Don’t stare at the hurdle and fail to try. Do not slow down in fear or you won’t clear it. Thanks 🙏🏻 GREAT point! I look at these things so differently that it’s hard to see what people consider a “hurdle”. Thanks 🙏🏻 again for all these beautiful interviews and ideas. Extremely important and helpful ❤️🔥🥰 And yes I am a runner. USATF track and field, and I run marathons (Boston in 2018) and ultramarathons. I set the policy for transgender runners for the world marathon majors too. By accident Lol 😂 I hope you have a great day and remember that the world needs positive vibes and you do too! Stay positive people! 😘
If information is replicated everywhere in quantum field, would not have to wait for a measurement to transfer information from one location to the other; the information would already be there?
The only correlation between space and matter is time. Time is cyclic. This is why we can't recognize outcomes and probability correlated to observation. Therefore even information is curved by a ratio. Sopan McFadden
Quantum entanglement is one of several pieces of evidence suggesting additional real physical dimensions we can't sense. Our understanding of particles so far leads us to believe that their influence falls off rapidly with distance. If this is true then objects that are distant in dimensions we can sense may be very close to each other in one or more dimensions we can't sense. It is dangerous to ignore time and the second law of thermodynamics because they are inconvenient to a theory. You'd need a much better reason than that.
If something is far away on the east-west axis, but very close on the north-south axis, it's still far away. Including an up-down axis can't make something be closer. Adding a fourth axis can only make something be farther away.
@@bozo5632 put a dot near the center of the edge on opposite sides of a piece of paper. They're far away. Now fold the paper in half and they're right next to each other in a dimension that wasn't on the paper. If you lived on the plane of that paper in two dimensions, the only two dimensions you could sense it would be an unsolvable mystery unless you hypothesized a third dimension you couldn't sense because it is beyond your experience. An electron at one energy level seeming to disappear and then reappear at another energy level in a different orbital is another piece of evidence suggesting this hypothesis. Just because you can't sense something doesn't mean it isn't real, doesn't exist. In a rational universe you need a rational explanation. If you can't think of even one then say I don't know, I have no idea, I haven't figured it out yet. Don't ascribe it to the tooth fairy.
@@markfischer3626 Now that I think about it, I have pretty much agreed with your statements here for years, and have said similar things many times. I'm a little surprised to read my own comment tbh. I read Flatland as a kid and it made an inordinately large impression on me, so as an idiot adult amateur armchair cosmologist, FWIW, my imagination favors 4D(+) Flatlandy explanations for seemingly paradoxical quantum and/or cosmological stuff. My pet name for my pet "theory" is "Thread Theory" (small joke). Of course KOS - MOS is entirely right, except that I don't have to be careful lol, because I'm an OFFICIAL idiot armchair cosmologist.
@@bozo5632 It's only a theory. If I'm proven wrong I have no problem with it. If you see it my way it's not quite so spooky after all but I can't think of any way to test it. I have many other theories that are at odds with mainstream thinking that I have problems with. Of all the things I ever studied the one I devoured was Euclidian geometry. But for years I was terribly bothered by being unable to visualize more than 3 dimensions. Then in my 20s I developed two tricks. One allowed me to.solve a problem in acoustics.. It has 6 dimensions. I superimpose one three dimensional aspect on another. As a result I can model, measure, analyze and engineer sound fields at will. I just love puzzles. I also love building things.
I believe that the so-called quantum action at a distance is not limited to single particles but also affects quantum clusters of arbitrary extent, which do not necessarily exist in a spatial or temporal context.
How can they keep thinking that muscle memory is moving backward in time. It isn't. Since, if your mind had to react too every movement as something new. It would slow our ability to even do the simplest of tasks.
My following comments are off topic but do relate in a small way to what was said in the video: 2:16 Pandora's Box just like Forrest Fenn said would be opened when his treasure chest gets found. 3:08 Exactly like in "The Thrill of The Chase," everyone is invested in their own solution or solve as they call it, to the poem.
I have one thing to say about Stuart Hameroff: Orchestrated Objective Reduction. Wait, that’s three things. Never mind, this guy along with Dr. Penrose created what I think is one of the most fascinating scientific theories ever. (IMHO, of course.)
(1:58) *RLK: **_"You can do anything if you go backwards in time. All problems can be solved if you can allow backwards-causation through time."_* ... Kuhn is correct! Just because quantum entanglement is difficult to understand does not imply that it has metaphysical origins. "Synchronicity" is merely a word we've assigned to random events that mysteriously present themselves as being orchestrated. *Example:* I owe a $1,500 mortgage payment to the bank by end of day, or they will foreclose on my house. I have no money, and I have no way to get to the bank in time because my car is broken. I receive an unexpected class action lawsuit payment of $1,500 in the mail right as a friend pulls up and says, _"Hey buddy, need a lift anywhere?"_ There is nothing metaphysical happening in this scenario, but it "appears" as if some strange, mystical force is looking out for me.
Don't Wheeler and Feynman both hypothesize about quantum particles being able to go both forward and backward in time? It's not like it's an unheard of idea in quantum physics.
@@longcastle4863 *"It's not like it's an unheard of idea in quantum physics."* ... Steady State Theory was once considered a "common idea" in quantum physics; however, commonality does not dictate plausibility. What's the difference between using God to explain quantum entanglement or time travel? After all, anyone able to go back in time has the God-like power to change all events happening in the future, ... right? *Conclusion:* The overwhelming desire to discover all the answers has compelled scientists to behave like theists and theists to behave like scientists.
@@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC Maybe I should have been more clear, but the only point I was really trying to make was that time reversibility at the quantum level is neither totally unheard of nor, as far as I can tell, totally dismissed by quantum physicist in general. More in the vein of still being up for debate -- an open and legitimate question that remains unresolved. I'm a layman, so if I'm wrong about that, so be it. But otherwise I was struck by and questioning why Kuhn seemed so resistant to giving the guy a chance to explain his ideas -- which, frankly, I was quite interested in hearing.
@@longcastle4863 *" I'm a layman, so if I'm wrong about that, so be it."* ... When it comes to quantum mechanics, we're all "laymen." As long as the mechanics of "Existence" remain a complete mystery, you can never be deemed as "wrong." *"But otherwise I was struck by and questioning why Kuhn seemed so resistant to giving the guy a chance to explain his ideas -- which, frankly, I was quite interested in hearing."* ... I understand. Unfortunately, time travel belongs to the metaphysical realm. There is no evidence that time travel is possible in any way (at the complex structure level or the quantum level). It's no different than forwarding that an Omnipotent Being is pulling all the strings. It's "closer to truth" that entanglement is not the result of time travel or God, but rather the result of some future-explainable phenomenon that merely appears to be metaphysical (i.e., time travel) to the human mind.
@@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC I like the discussion you two have, so I want to offer some perspective. "There is no evidence that time travel is possible in any way (at the complex structure level or the quantum level)." There wasnt any evidence of quantum mechanics in the 1800, so the scientific comunity would label the idea of quantum mechanics as "metaphysical" if explained to them. They would probably label as metaphysical even the fact that space bends light. Say that to a scientist from 200 years ago, and they will label it as nonsense or metaphysical, with no roots in science. The thing is, we have 0.000000000000001% knowledge about existence, so I think that its a bit of a strech and inaccurate to asume that the evidence which we can gather with 0.000000000000001% knowledge about existence can suggest something relevant about the rest of the 99.9999999999% of existence.The most significant discoveries that changed the world, usually, contradicted what was known. People thought that the earth is the center of the universe....until it was proven wrong. Maybe, in 200-300-500 years, some of the most accepted theories right now will be proven wrong. Also, I want to ask, what do we consider metaphysical, and what is scientific? I mean....for example , after 500 years we somehow prove that the soul exist(I am not advocating for the existence of soul or anything, I dont know what to believe, I am just giving an example). If we find the underlying mechanism of the soul, is the soul still metaphysical? I think not. My conclusion is : 1. What evidence can suggest is defined by our current knowledge and understanding of reality, but that doesnt mean that anything contradicting that knowledge and understanding isn't equally possible. 2. Something is labeled as metaphysical just because it streches beyond the boundaries of our proven knowledge, but that doesnt mean that it will allways remain metaphysical. Going backwards in time is metaphysical just because we dont know any better, and have limited knowledge, but in fact, it can be possible and there is a clear mechanism , but we are just too primitive for that.
Could replication of information everywhere in quantum field explain both superposition and entanglement? How might information be replicated everywhere in quantum field?
Had some weird stuff happen to me , and there definitely is some realities out there but it's useless for any practical use anyone who think it can be understood or controlled is simply missing the point , it's going to make you going crazy it cannot be integrated in our reality beside wishful thinking , when it happen , just go ..."shuck that's weird and walk away "
actually the question is the other way around the origin of the universe was non-local, but space-time emerged, so you assume that all points of the universe were linked and were one, the question will be, how did "locality" emerge from non-locality the entangled particles are normal (not the norm), the non-local ones are the ones who need explanation
Good news everyone! According to my theory: @@waynebrinker8095 ‘s theory is 100% just as correct as my theory, which has the exact same odds as being correct as The Force or the One True God. Grab on to your chosen reality and hold on tight.
I hate listening to conversations in which people are repeatedly interrupted, and the questions seem to be in bad faith. Could not finish these four mins 🙃
The way I put it is this, with ESP and an afterlife, there is proof and mathematical allowance for it in things like M-theory and Brane theory, but no evidence that is utterly irrefutable. Not yet at least.
How can time be related to consciousness when the passage of time predates human consciousness. Once Stuart raised that point, it diminished his credibility.
Not "consciousness." This is something a lot of people seem to misunderstand. The observer is not required to be conscious. Rather, an "observer" is just a measurement. It does not require consciousness.
Short answer, no. My take, not especially, but what I gather is that there are different quantum properties. Quantum superposition disappears on contact with any other particle, taking on a statistical value that explains observations. Contact like from a photon we might want to use to observe the quantum state. Entanglement is a special case of more than one quantum particle being related so that when one is measured (makes contact) the other takes on a predictable value. Weird, but it's been proven that it can't be used to communicate faster than light. Another quantum property is uncertainty, where you can't know pairs of parameters to arbitrary precision, like energy and time (radioactive decay), or position and velocity. Then there's the macroscopic property that electrons in atoms are in shells with specific energies. When electrons move between levels they emit or absorb a photon with a specific energy, not some intermediate value. Each element is defined by the number of positive charges in its nucleus, and a corresponding number of electrons in its shells. But the electrons can be displaced (current in metals) and atoms with electrons short of a full shell can bond with atoms with more electrons than a full shell (chemistry). Chemistry is macroscopic and it could be the case that certain chemical reactions are facilitated by some quantum property, but to say that that's the source of consciousness because we don't understand it is the same mistake as when we used to say lightening is the god's being mad at us. Eventually we'll figure it out. It might be quantum but it also might be that you are not real, we're all just a simulation. Or that magnets in your shoes will improve your health. The quantum realm has several aspects and it's very weird and abstract. Hypothesizing ideas like synchronicity or universal consciousness is folly. Unfortunately any idea can have traction among those that have not developed a sufficient expertise in the subject.
I had to read through a hundred comments before I came to the first one that properly answered the question. Lots of seekers making conclusions without the required science education or trying to make sense of questions that don't have answers. (I didn't watch the video, just wanted to get a flavor from the comments).
Okay, let's say that we could use the quantum entanglement to achieve "faster than light" communications. Practically how that would work is that you'd take two quantum entangled particles and physically transport each of them to widely different locations. That transporting would take a substantial period of time, much slower than the speed of light. Then you'd communicate something at a faster than light speed between the two particles. What would the advantage be? Certainly could not be used for communication outside our physical domain, not through space to another star system.
so if we extrapolate from the perspective of a sci-fi writer, you can maybe bend logic and conceive of some local teleportation system eventually being developed under the basis of this theory but ultimately as you said only within our physical domain...
Hey Brud--I'm no physicist but I like this stuff. I think the answer to your question is if entangled particles could be used for communicating meaningful information--and so far I don't believe anyone suspects that there is a real way of doing this--then you would have instantaneous access between these two points. So, for example, we could contact a Mars rover in real time, issue commands in real time, instead of the 4-24 minutes it takes now. Maybe that doesn't sound like some great advantage but imagine a time when we are able to send a tiny probe or probes to Proxima Centauri with an entangled particle communication with us here on earth. That's over 4 lights years away, so I think you can understand then the real benefit of this. It's not likely to happen, however, because guys much, much smarter and more schooled about this than myself believe that once you force a measurement of the particle the entanglement is broken. So we can observe the entanglement but we can't manipulate it.
So, after his paper gets published it will be accepted that information can be transmitted faster than light? Isn't everybody jaded with current physics and would actually like this idea? I deem i impossible that if there is a remote hint to this everybody would jump at it.
I thought he said that the information went back in time and that's why it could get there faster than light? I think maybe he has moved on from science into science fiction.
@@caricue I am not sure, didn't Robert bring this backward causality argument? So, basically entanglement is realized by utilizing a reverse time action principle. I hardly doubt that quantum cryptography utilizes this, but I am no expert in any of this.
One day it will be a known fact that reality happens from you, not to you. Which is what Jesus meant when he said, "the kingdom of God is within you". Every thing, every person, every experience is your version - your reflection. This is why each and every moment is synchronistic. Synchronicity never stops. If for example you are operating from a positive energy you will experience positive synchronicity to reinforce the positive experience. Synchronicity is the effortless coordination of all parts of not just your reality but all the universe through the one Universal Mind. The higher your frequency the more you will notice synchronous events, life because more magical in that way because you see everything as connected.
i used to be 'skeptical' about these sort of things until I had several out of body experiences as well as lucid states during my sleep. now i know how important it is to keep an open mind.
Being skeptical simply means withholding judgement on a subject until the evidence becomes convincing enough either way. That is the definition of open minded. Being cynical means not accepting the evidence even when provided. That is the definition of close minded.
@@danij5055 not sure i understand your point, but let me re iterate my point...there was a time i did not believe in things like OBEs and NDEs and Lucid Dreams etc..but then I started experiencing them myself..hence I was wrong to be so closed minded.
Synchronicity‘s have been happening so often in my life lately, now this video comes up on my feed. Too bad I don’t understand anything they’re saying lol
Don't worry they're trying to understand it too. Synchronicity and when it happens is a sign you are aligned going the way of natural order you could say. The universe is with you.
Quantum particles are underteminate. Particles real world are unpredicted. Otherwise conscieness hasnt Works to figuret out particles reality. He is so confusion about particles when he has honest phichs concept. Unfortunetly he Not show up how particles phisch in time. Certainly fundamental theory phisch didnt it.
The Microscopic is Everywhere Within and All Around the Macroscopic! Without Entanglement nothing is Possible not even Locality itself! Begin with an All Encompassing Nonlocality(the Canvas) to get many Possible Local regions Within it(Things/objects etc) as the Art of Continuous Creation!.
as a " young " man i was very much into Jung im not anymore yet if i remember correctly: if it is what it was if it is there is no scientific proof ever possible - that´s the trick...(Mephisto)
no 'event' is separate, our viewing of things in patterns comes from the illusion of linear form and 'order'... u can thank European ideology for the confusion
Backward Time was first proposed over 100 years ago(Sidis) and endorsed by Feynman. There are also a number of Arxiv papers on this. The key to a better understanding of Gravity would be to utilise Backward Time.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. The word quantum is to woo as champagne is to wines. Consciousness is mysterious. Quantum is non-intuitive and some find it mysterious. Ergo quantum generates consciousness. I see it clearly now. So obvious. /sarcasm
I wonder if quantum events occur in warm wet bottles of snake oil? You know Penrose is getting older now and I somehow feel like this guy is using Penrose to further his own interests. Someone has got to look out for good ol' Roger who will follow an interesting thought or concept and trusts those around him, that being said I think that these were filmed a while ago
Dang, I don't understand why the interviewer seems so sure of himself and ready to deride this dude; that ain't science. Let the man bear his case before his peers in an open forum. Till then stfu with your objections
It would be nice if someone somewhere would read my original papers and my book showing that this “backward in time” effect is the only possible way that brains and universes can possibly exist. We are leaving out half the Universe. I explain how and why and introduce a scientific methodology for demonstrating this which has been independently verified. I used to teach experimental methodology at Emory University and I left graduate school to write the papers and book because the paradigm of brain and mind was fundamentally flawed and paradoxical. It heartens me in the extreme to see this. No one would listen to me all these years and I never caved in or let go because I am right. When everything fits together into a coherent picture, that is a valid epistemological point. No one can say that you put the puzzle together wrong -even if it isn’t complete. I have both experimental evidence AND this total epistemological picture. The reason no one listens is the exact reason Stuart Hameroff says. Even if they want to entertain their own theories, fine. But you cannot avoid the paradoxes and you cannot “fudge” what the connection of mind and matter actually are. Or the mechanism of how they relate to human and universal history. If you merely say “things are not separate” then you have merely embarked upon a journey. Whereas I have been on that journey for a long time. Now, Like Darwin on the Beagle, I am coming home. I am bringing it all together. My second book is nearly complete. I unlock a lot of meaning, a lot of relationships in modern history and technology. My first book is the foundation and mechanics of the backward in time effect. It was called “The Textbook of the Universe: The Genetic Ascent to God” published in 2003 after a couple years traveling around the world presenting papers and my own years of unique research. I keep trying. That’s all I can do. My friends who know me talk about when all the predictions I make come true as “the world catching up”. It would be nice if they would hurry up. I live in my car because I never will give up. It’s not just principle either. This stuff is VITALLY IMPORTANT. I love people and I want them to have a future. Thanks 🙏🏻 for listening if you did. ❤️🔥 And as for a “panacea” of the effect, I would not have even began writing if I did not account for that at the outset. Perhaps that’s why people don’t understand-they are stuck on a lot of paradoxical stumbling blocks which I see as hurdles in my track and field practice. Looking beyond and over hurdles let’s you see the air above them where you can fit through. Don’t stare at the hurdle and fail to try. Do not slow down in fear or you won’t clear it. Thanks 🙏🏻 GREAT point! I look at these things so differently that it’s hard to see what people consider a “hurdle”. Thanks 🙏🏻 again for all these beautiful interviews and ideas. Extremely important and helpful ❤️🔥🥰 And yes I am a runner. USATF track and field, and I run marathons (Boston in 2018) and ultramarathons. I set the policy for transgender runners for the world marathon majors too. By accident Lol 😂 I hope you have a great day and remember that the world needs positive vibes and you do too! Stay positive people! 😘
One of the few times it seems Kuhn just doesn't let someone explain their theory. I mean, my God! Consider how much more tolerant he is of all the theist he has on his channel with claims so much more questionable than what is being proposed here.
*" Consider how much more tolerant he is of all the theist he has on his channel with claims so much more questionable than what is being proposed here."* .... Theists operate using a metaphysical foundation from the get-go. Everything a theist proposes comes from that type of ideology. However, the moment a theist starts embedding science into their arguments, ... _RLK pounces on them._ Scientists operate using an observable, materialist foundation. Everything a scientist proposes comes from that type of ideology. However, the moment a scientist starts embedding metaphysical properties into their arguments, ... _RLK pounces on them._ RLK is an equal opportunity "pouncer."
I appreciate the wide range of topics that are discussed on this channel. Well done
Good for you. He discussion not show at same level Roger Penrose.
I love how knowledgeable and how well and intelligent Stuart's use of language is.
Too short. Give us more!
Go to the homepage. There are tons of stuff.
Excellent..... Distinguished Dr Hamarhoff has beautifully , elegantly , boldly explained his views which are supported by several noble laureates including renowned noble laureate Distinguished Dr Brian Josephson ( claims ESP 99% accuracy ) , renowned scientists and philosophers , scholars , medical doctors ...it is also supported by 2 billion Hindus and Buddhist (vedanta etc. ) who believe nonlocal is fundamental... thanks 🙏.
For millennia, quiet, unassuming little men in orange and yellow robes have been telling us exactly how it is
Closer to Truth , my most Favorite Program
When he said "plants can do it", i.e, quantum effects in macro warm wetware biology, he needs to be careful what people are actually saying, in the emerging field of quantum biology. Evolution maybe able to engender additional marginal advantages, using quantum effects, on top of a largely classical system, for greater efficiencies in photosynthesis. It's still largely a local event, within the chloroplasts. Same with other effects, such as enhanced enzymatic reactions. They are not talking about long range entanglements.
Fax no printer, quantum biology is probably how life started, if not an extremophile panspermia solution.
A lot of amazing claims here by Stuart, guess we just got to wait for his paper from him and Roger to see if it is all justifiable!
As soon as they build a time machine I'll get to see the dinosaurs, building of the pyramids, and the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.
I mean a human mind can alter a random number generator’s average number remotely, so I see no reason why not.
How much of this is Quantum Woo, and how much is legit?
By current evidence based understanding, Synchronicity most probably is some kind of psychological bias. Things like the frequency illusion, Baader-Meinhoff phenomenon, confirmation bias, etc.
That is what you think until you start experiencing it reguarly. Suddenly it seems weird but real.
@@5Dworld I have experienced my fair share but still enough to give into faith based explanations.
According to Carl Jung synchronicity is due to the fact that ideas that are similar or related to each-other have a sort of "magnetic pull" and tend to attract each-other. At the macro level that is translated as 2 events having a common meaning (or common denominator) tend to attract each other. Such as you thinking of your neighbor's mad dog while taking a walk, then you see a dog eating a cat, etc...
Please, in the future, if someone wants to discuss how faster than light communication may possibly be possible with quantum entanglement, _let them!_ Why not at least give him a chance to explain his ideas?
Ikr this interviewer is kinda rude
I think that there is not need to explain it as it is self-evident.
@@ai._m The cool thing about the internet is that if you don't like the conversion or don't have time for it you can switch it to O-F-F mode.
This is what irks me about Kuhn. On one hand he gives these ideas a platform which many might not do, but he can't seem to help letting his bias come through as talks all over the interviewee. It doesn't seem very professional.
@@ai._m Accolades have nothing to do with abysmal behavior during an interview. Sounds like I touched a nerve, lol.
Some interesting arguments.
So much information in 4 minutes!
Love this channel ❤️
My new favorite channel 💞✨
I experienced it on a high level there is something mystical.I saw an entity you can call it divine or power or ...but yes this power exists everywhere beyond this world.Synchronicity is a way of this power to talk to us
First time Stuart makes a little sense to me, even though only in metaphysically possibilities. Although still you cannot transfer information like Robert Lawrence says, except 'collapsed state' versus 'uncollapsed state'. And how on earth are our brains entangled?
You can, indeed, transfer some information in a tricky way. The result of the "collapse" depends on what kind of measurement is performed, so you can still use inference to indirectly transmit some kind of "clue" of what's being done.
It's a tricky process but it works. And if you make this process complex enough, with enough variables, I'm pretty sure that you'd be able to "transfer" almost any kind of "message".
Alot of times I have prescient visions and know something before I realize I know it.
I will be calling this doctor. Usually go by my Hebrew name Jacova. It's the female form of Jacob.
Beauty, truth, cupidity, equality, time are these aspects of the world or aspects of ourselves. Can we disentangle ourselves from the world? Can we disentangle truth from correctness, synchronicity, time? How? By proposing another aspect another measurement?
I suspect we can not disentangle ourselves from the world. Not even by death. Does that mean that we are fundamental to the world or just an aspect? Does it matter?
If we found beauty in evil or evil in beauty does that sour the truth or make it more sweet?
spoken like someone whose hard work has paid off
Interesting and worthwhile video. Quantum entanglement would be too unstable for macroscopic effects. The must be another mechanism if synchronicity is true, and I'm inclined to believe some legitimate effect is there.
I’ve followed Stuart for years, pure genius and far ahead of his time.
The problem I have is that if all this metaphysical stuff is true, e.g. faster than light travel, sending information to the past, time is an illusion, etc, then why does our reality have any coherency whatsoever?
Because our minds want coherency and imagine that our realities are stable and coherent. Our minds learn this from infancy, so that we can avert fear.
Some of what you talk about refers to quantum mechanics only. For our reality matter has lost its wave-like properties through decoherence, which make such things impossible.
These phenomena would have a nature and have limits. So the result of them existing is not an end to coherent. They would not lead to randomness nor undo all the ‘normal phenoman’
@@alexandersalamander I guess that's the mental leap I can't get to. Once all these things are available, that's the end of causality and the fundamentals of classical physics. Now, if all these phenomenon are only available in the quatum world and not the classical world, then I guess that's different. But that also tells me that all these classical-defying phenomenon which exist in the quantum world, cannot affect the macroscopic world. It's either one or the other: either you get a universe where nothing is impossible, or you get our world with real limits.
@@saturdaysequalsyouth i suppose as it's briefly mentioned in the video, all the so called quantum effects also happen in classical macro physical world, but our conscienceness selects/préfères only to perceive classical local linear events. I.e. we only perceive one direction of time because our brain has some mécanisme that might give us something like the illusion of free choice or so. As the quantum effects don't affect causal relationships you don't get any disadvantages by sticking to your time arrow.
Synchronicity is real, I think more we understand the meditation and brain, more we will have such events and thought manifestation. I have experienced this spooky Einstein thing first hand. It’s cool stuff.
I developed an actual experimental methodology for that with staggeringly significant results. It was then independently verified by Gary Schwartz at the University of Arizona in his book “Supersynchronicity”. I taught experimental methodology at Emory University and so that’s part of how I developed a way to get quantitative traction on such a subjective idea. Thanks 🙏🏻 ❤️🔥
I reproduce my comment on this video for your perusal. Stuart and I know each other and have some history together too. Here’s what I wrote and included a reference to the book I wrote about the backward in time effect:
It would be nice if someone somewhere would read my original papers and my book showing that this “backward in time” effect is the only possible way that brains and universes can possibly exist. We are leaving out half the Universe. I explain how and why and introduce a scientific methodology for demonstrating this which has been independently verified. I used to teach experimental methodology at Emory University and I left graduate school to write the papers and book because the paradigm of brain and mind was fundamentally flawed and paradoxical.
It heartens me in the extreme to see this. No one would listen to me all these years and I never caved in or let go because I am right. When everything fits together into a coherent picture, that is a valid epistemological point. No one can say that you put the puzzle together wrong -even if it isn’t complete. I have both experimental evidence AND this total epistemological picture. The reason no one listens is the exact reason Stuart Hameroff says. Even if they want to entertain their own theories, fine. But you cannot avoid the paradoxes and you cannot “fudge” what the connection of mind and matter actually are. Or the mechanism of how they relate to human and universal history. If you merely say “things are not separate” then you have merely embarked upon a journey. Whereas I have been on that journey for a long time. Now, Like Darwin on the Beagle, I am coming home. I am bringing it all together. My second book is nearly complete. I unlock a lot of meaning, a lot of relationships in modern history and technology.
My first book is the foundation and mechanics of the backward in time effect. It was called “The Textbook of the Universe: The Genetic Ascent to God” published in 2003 after a couple years traveling around the world presenting papers and my own years of unique research. I keep trying. That’s all I can do. My friends who know me talk about when all the predictions I make come true as “the world catching up”. It would be nice if they would hurry up. I live in my car because I never will give up. It’s not just principle either. This stuff is VITALLY IMPORTANT. I love people and I want them to have a future. Thanks 🙏🏻 for listening if you did. ❤️🔥
And as for a “panacea” of the effect, I would not have even began writing if I did not account for that at the outset. Perhaps that’s why people don’t understand-they are stuck on a lot of paradoxical stumbling blocks which I see as hurdles in my track and field practice. Looking beyond and over hurdles let’s you see the air above them where you can fit through. Don’t stare at the hurdle and fail to try. Do not slow down in fear or you won’t clear it. Thanks 🙏🏻 GREAT point! I look at these things so differently that it’s hard to see what people consider a “hurdle”. Thanks 🙏🏻 again for all these beautiful interviews and ideas. Extremely important and helpful ❤️🔥🥰
And yes I am a runner. USATF track and field, and I run marathons (Boston in 2018) and ultramarathons. I set the policy for transgender runners for the world marathon majors too. By accident Lol 😂 I hope you have a great day and remember that the world needs positive vibes and you do too! Stay positive people! 😘
@@spiralsun1 …and Max Tagmark’s rebuttal, mathematically proof?
Stuart Hameroff is top tier!
I love the interviewer
If information is replicated everywhere in quantum field, would not have to wait for a measurement to transfer information from one location to the other; the information would already be there?
The only correlation between space and matter is time. Time is cyclic. This is why we can't recognize outcomes and probability correlated to observation. Therefore even information is curved by a ratio. Sopan McFadden
How does information travel along quantum field? Or can information exist everywhere in quantum field at the same time?
Well said and stated.
Thank you
Is CAUSALITY a fundamental law of nature? Is causality a directional vector in the flow of time?
Quantum entanglement is one of several pieces of evidence suggesting additional real physical dimensions we can't sense. Our understanding of particles so far leads us to believe that their influence falls off rapidly with distance. If this is true then objects that are distant in dimensions we can sense may be very close to each other in one or more dimensions we can't sense.
It is dangerous to ignore time and the second law of thermodynamics because they are inconvenient to a theory. You'd need a much better reason than that.
There is no evidence for an extra dimension. You have to be careful with additional dimensions when describing experiment outcomes.
If something is far away on the east-west axis, but very close on the north-south axis, it's still far away. Including an up-down axis can't make something be closer. Adding a fourth axis can only make something be farther away.
@@bozo5632 put a dot near the center of the edge on opposite sides of a piece of paper. They're far away. Now fold the paper in half and they're right next to each other in a dimension that wasn't on the paper. If you lived on the plane of that paper in two dimensions, the only two dimensions you could sense it would be an unsolvable mystery unless you hypothesized a third dimension you couldn't sense because it is beyond your experience. An electron at one energy level seeming to disappear and then reappear at another energy level in a different orbital is another piece of evidence suggesting this hypothesis. Just because you can't sense something doesn't mean it isn't real, doesn't exist. In a rational universe you need a rational explanation. If you can't think of even one then say I don't know, I have no idea, I haven't figured it out yet. Don't ascribe it to the tooth fairy.
@@markfischer3626 Now that I think about it, I have pretty much agreed with your statements here for years, and have said similar things many times. I'm a little surprised to read my own comment tbh. I read Flatland as a kid and it made an inordinately large impression on me, so as an idiot adult amateur armchair cosmologist, FWIW, my imagination favors 4D(+) Flatlandy explanations for seemingly paradoxical quantum and/or cosmological stuff. My pet name for my pet "theory" is "Thread Theory" (small joke).
Of course KOS - MOS is entirely right, except that I don't have to be careful lol, because I'm an OFFICIAL idiot armchair cosmologist.
@@bozo5632 It's only a theory. If I'm proven wrong I have no problem with it. If you see it my way it's not quite so spooky after all but I can't think of any way to test it. I have many other theories that are at odds with mainstream thinking that I have problems with. Of all the things I ever studied the one I devoured was Euclidian geometry. But for years I was terribly bothered by being unable to visualize more than 3 dimensions. Then in my 20s I developed two tricks. One allowed me to.solve a problem in acoustics.. It has 6 dimensions. I superimpose one three dimensional aspect on another. As a result I can model, measure, analyze and engineer sound fields at will. I just love puzzles. I also love building things.
I believe that the so-called quantum action at a distance is not limited to single particles but also affects quantum clusters of arbitrary extent, which do not necessarily exist in a spatial or temporal context.
How can they keep thinking that muscle memory is moving
backward in time. It isn't.
Since, if your mind had to react too every movement as something new. It would slow our ability to even do the simplest of tasks.
My following comments are off topic but do relate in a small way to what was said in the video:
2:16 Pandora's Box just like Forrest Fenn said would be opened when his treasure chest gets found. 3:08 Exactly like in "The Thrill of The Chase," everyone is invested in their own solution or solve as they call it, to the poem.
Haha! Pretty "synchronistic" seeing this here. As I know exactly what you're talking about
I have one thing to say about Stuart Hameroff: Orchestrated Objective Reduction. Wait, that’s three things. Never mind, this guy along with Dr. Penrose created what I think is one of the most fascinating scientific theories ever. (IMHO, of course.)
You should interview Wolfgang kundt. He presents arguments that black holes do not exist.
It’s really more than that…
When you ‘feel’ the syncrona
even in the quantum scale or any scale, sequential events require time dependency...
Photons don't care about time, why should we?
@@NiteTrain345 last time I checked, a photon had a source, energy, and also momentum...
Synchronicity is when Google secretly wire taps your device and starts posting advertisements about the subject matter of your private conversations.
(1:58) *RLK: **_"You can do anything if you go backwards in time. All problems can be solved if you can allow backwards-causation through time."_* ... Kuhn is correct! Just because quantum entanglement is difficult to understand does not imply that it has metaphysical origins. "Synchronicity" is merely a word we've assigned to random events that mysteriously present themselves as being orchestrated.
*Example:* I owe a $1,500 mortgage payment to the bank by end of day, or they will foreclose on my house. I have no money, and I have no way to get to the bank in time because my car is broken. I receive an unexpected class action lawsuit payment of $1,500 in the mail right as a friend pulls up and says, _"Hey buddy, need a lift anywhere?"_
There is nothing metaphysical happening in this scenario, but it "appears" as if some strange, mystical force is looking out for me.
Don't Wheeler and Feynman both hypothesize about quantum particles being able to go both forward and backward in time? It's not like it's an unheard of idea in quantum physics.
@@longcastle4863 *"It's not like it's an unheard of idea in quantum physics."*
... Steady State Theory was once considered a "common idea" in quantum physics; however, commonality does not dictate plausibility. What's the difference between using God to explain quantum entanglement or time travel? After all, anyone able to go back in time has the God-like power to change all events happening in the future, ... right?
*Conclusion:* The overwhelming desire to discover all the answers has compelled scientists to behave like theists and theists to behave like scientists.
@@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC Maybe I should have been more clear, but the only point I was really trying to make was that time reversibility at the quantum level is neither totally unheard of nor, as far as I can tell, totally dismissed by quantum physicist in general. More in the vein of still being up for debate -- an open and legitimate question that remains unresolved. I'm a layman, so if I'm wrong about that, so be it. But otherwise I was struck by and questioning why Kuhn seemed so resistant to giving the guy a chance to explain his ideas -- which, frankly, I was quite interested in hearing.
@@longcastle4863 *" I'm a layman, so if I'm wrong about that, so be it."*
... When it comes to quantum mechanics, we're all "laymen." As long as the mechanics of "Existence" remain a complete mystery, you can never be deemed as "wrong."
*"But otherwise I was struck by and questioning why Kuhn seemed so resistant to giving the guy a chance to explain his ideas -- which, frankly, I was quite interested in hearing."*
... I understand. Unfortunately, time travel belongs to the metaphysical realm. There is no evidence that time travel is possible in any way (at the complex structure level or the quantum level). It's no different than forwarding that an Omnipotent Being is pulling all the strings.
It's "closer to truth" that entanglement is not the result of time travel or God, but rather the result of some future-explainable phenomenon that merely appears to be metaphysical (i.e., time travel) to the human mind.
@@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC
I like the discussion you two have, so I want to offer some perspective.
"There is no evidence that time travel is possible in any way (at the complex structure level or the quantum level)."
There wasnt any evidence of quantum mechanics in the 1800, so the scientific comunity would label the idea of quantum mechanics as "metaphysical" if explained to them. They would probably label as metaphysical even the fact that space bends light. Say that to a scientist from 200 years ago, and they will label it as nonsense or metaphysical, with no roots in science. The thing is, we have 0.000000000000001% knowledge about existence, so I think that its a bit of a strech and inaccurate to asume that the evidence which we can gather with 0.000000000000001% knowledge about existence can suggest something relevant about the rest of the 99.9999999999% of existence.The most significant discoveries that changed the world, usually, contradicted what was known. People thought that the earth is the center of the universe....until it was proven wrong. Maybe, in 200-300-500 years, some of the most accepted theories right now will be proven wrong.
Also, I want to ask, what do we consider metaphysical, and what is scientific? I mean....for example , after 500 years we somehow prove that the soul exist(I am not advocating for the existence of soul or anything, I dont know what to believe, I am just giving an example). If we find the underlying mechanism of the soul, is the soul still metaphysical? I think not.
My conclusion is : 1. What evidence can suggest is defined by our current knowledge and understanding of reality, but that doesnt mean that anything contradicting that knowledge and understanding isn't equally possible.
2. Something is labeled as metaphysical just because it streches beyond the boundaries of our proven knowledge, but that doesnt mean that it will allways remain metaphysical. Going backwards in time is metaphysical just because we dont know any better, and have limited knowledge, but in fact, it can be possible and there is a clear mechanism , but we are just too primitive for that.
Time is only perception of events. Everything happens now. In The Present. There is always present, nothing else.
Look up "block universe." It's a very interesting concept.
Could replication of information everywhere in quantum field explain both superposition and entanglement? How might information be replicated everywhere in quantum field?
Had some weird stuff happen to me , and there definitely is some realities out there
but it's useless for any practical use
anyone who think it can be understood or controlled is simply missing the point , it's going to make you going crazy
it cannot be integrated in our reality beside wishful thinking , when it happen , just go ..."shuck that's weird and walk away "
I've never seen Kuhn so blatantly skeptical of someone he was interviewing.
actually the question is the other way around
the origin of the universe was non-local, but space-time emerged, so you assume that all points of the universe were linked and were one, the question will be, how did "locality" emerge from non-locality
the entangled particles are normal (not the norm), the non-local ones are the ones who need explanation
It's a form of communication, a language.
Incredible Hameroff as a consciousness.
Audio needs work
I need to read this paper, because frankly this fits quite nicely into my Vibrational Omniverse Theory.
Utter nonsense!
It is obvious that this strongly supports my Non-local Oscillating Vibrational Pulse Theory.
@@waynebrinker8095 Well have you read their paper!
Good news everyone! According to my theory: @@waynebrinker8095 ‘s theory is 100% just as correct as my theory, which has the exact same odds as being correct as The Force or the One True God.
Grab on to your chosen reality and hold on tight.
@@chadwcmichael
Professor Farnsworth! Good one.
I hate listening to conversations in which people are repeatedly interrupted, and the questions seem to be in bad faith. Could not finish these four mins 🙃
The way I put it is this, with ESP and an afterlife, there is proof and mathematical allowance for it in things like M-theory and Brane theory, but no evidence that is utterly irrefutable. Not yet at least.
How can time be related to consciousness when the passage of time predates human consciousness. Once Stuart raised that point, it diminished his credibility.
Exactly. As soon as I heard that, I had the same reaction.
Could it be that consciousness and time are part of the same thing?
The apparent effect of consciousness on the double slit experiment has been shown in experiment.
Not "consciousness." This is something a lot of people seem to misunderstand. The observer is not required to be conscious. Rather, an "observer" is just a measurement. It does not require consciousness.
"Consciousness causes time". Yeah ok, one of THOSE guys.
And no, spooky action at a distance CANNOT be used to transmit information faster than light.
Completely agree with you here
Alrighty then.. 👌
I need someone to break this down for me a little. The entanglement part. Is there anyone here who fully understands?
Short answer, no. My take, not especially, but what I gather is that there are different quantum properties. Quantum superposition disappears on contact with any other particle, taking on a statistical value that explains observations. Contact like from a photon we might want to use to observe the quantum state. Entanglement is a special case of more than one quantum particle being related so that when one is measured (makes contact) the other takes on a predictable value. Weird, but it's been proven that it can't be used to communicate faster than light. Another quantum property is uncertainty, where you can't know pairs of parameters to arbitrary precision, like energy and time (radioactive decay), or position and velocity. Then there's the macroscopic property that electrons in atoms are in shells with specific energies. When electrons move between levels they emit or absorb a photon with a specific energy, not some intermediate value. Each element is defined by the number of positive charges in its nucleus, and a corresponding number of electrons in its shells. But the electrons can be displaced (current in metals) and atoms with electrons short of a full shell can bond with atoms with more electrons than a full shell (chemistry). Chemistry is macroscopic and it could be the case that certain chemical reactions are facilitated by some quantum property, but to say that that's the source of consciousness because we don't understand it is the same mistake as when we used to say lightening is the god's being mad at us. Eventually we'll figure it out. It might be quantum but it also might be that you are not real, we're all just a simulation. Or that magnets in your shoes will improve your health. The quantum realm has several aspects and it's very weird and abstract. Hypothesizing ideas like synchronicity or universal consciousness is folly. Unfortunately any idea can have traction among those that have not developed a sufficient expertise in the subject.
Synchronicity is The Police song. And very important that satellites are synchronized by atomic clock.
I had to read through a hundred comments before I came to the first one that properly answered the question. Lots of seekers making conclusions without the required science education or trying to make sense of questions that don't have answers. (I didn't watch the video, just wanted to get a flavor from the comments).
Stuart "I'm not the only one" Hameroff
Okay, let's say that we could use the quantum entanglement to achieve "faster than light" communications. Practically how that would work is that you'd take two quantum entangled particles and physically transport each of them to widely different locations. That transporting would take a substantial period of time, much slower than the speed of light. Then you'd communicate something at a faster than light speed between the two particles. What would the advantage be? Certainly could not be used for communication outside our physical domain, not through space to another star system.
so if we extrapolate from the perspective of a sci-fi writer, you can maybe bend logic and conceive of some local teleportation system eventually being developed under the basis of this theory but ultimately as you said only within our physical domain...
Hey Brud--I'm no physicist but I like this stuff. I think the answer to your question is if entangled particles could be used for communicating meaningful information--and so far I don't believe anyone suspects that there is a real way of doing this--then you would have instantaneous access between these two points. So, for example, we could contact a Mars rover in real time, issue commands in real time, instead of the 4-24 minutes it takes now. Maybe that doesn't sound like some great advantage but imagine a time when we are able to send a tiny probe or probes to Proxima Centauri with an entangled particle communication with us here on earth. That's over 4 lights years away, so I think you can understand then the real benefit of this. It's not likely to happen, however, because guys much, much smarter and more schooled about this than myself believe that once you force a measurement of the particle the entanglement is broken. So we can observe the entanglement but we can't manipulate it.
So, after his paper gets published it will be accepted that information can be transmitted faster than light? Isn't everybody jaded with current physics and would actually like this idea? I deem i impossible that if there is a remote hint to this everybody would jump at it.
I thought he said that the information went back in time and that's why it could get there faster than light? I think maybe he has moved on from science into science fiction.
@@caricue I am not sure, didn't Robert bring this backward causality argument? So, basically entanglement is realized by utilizing a reverse time action principle. I hardly doubt that quantum cryptography utilizes this, but I am no expert in any of this.
One day it will be a known fact that reality happens from you, not to you. Which is what Jesus meant when he said, "the kingdom of God is within you". Every thing, every person, every experience is your version - your reflection. This is why each and every moment is synchronistic. Synchronicity never stops. If for example you are operating from a positive energy you will experience positive synchronicity to reinforce the positive experience. Synchronicity is the effortless coordination of all parts of not just your reality but all the universe through the one Universal Mind. The higher your frequency the more you will notice synchronous events, life because more magical in that way because you see everything as connected.
And here I thought it was just a record by the Police.
It's hard to have a straight response to the word salads served up in these comments. I think you nailed it.
i used to be 'skeptical' about these sort of things until I had several out of body experiences as well as lucid states during my sleep. now i know how important it is to keep an open mind.
Sounds very scientific.
Being skeptical simply means withholding judgement on a subject until the evidence becomes convincing enough either way. That is the definition of open minded.
Being cynical means not accepting the evidence even when provided. That is the definition of close minded.
Please don't conflate them.
@@danij5055 not sure i understand your point, but let me re iterate my point...there was a time i did not believe in things like OBEs and NDEs and Lucid Dreams etc..but then I started experiencing them myself..hence I was wrong to be so closed minded.
We don't see it because we are blinded by the classical arrow of time in which we live our lives. Time Symmetric Quantum Mechanics
Synchronicity‘s have been happening so often in my life lately, now this video comes up on my feed. Too bad I don’t understand anything they’re saying lol
Don't worry they're trying to understand it too.
Synchronicity and when it happens is a sign you are aligned going the way of natural order you could say. The universe is with you.
@@S3RAVA3LMI keep seeing my exes name and birthday, Dino how to work out what it means though
Synchronicity, boop boop!
Robert only presses those like this whom are closest to truth.
Intuition, esp, clairvoyance, Nous etc. Are real.
interesting
I experienced synchronisity but only once
Lots of talk, but ever explained what "synchronicity" is.
This is like Joe Rogan…
For people who can do math
Haha, memeworthy comment!
For people not injected with ink and not inhaling weed
@@grijzekijker 😳
I get the impression Dr Kuhn really really dislikes Hameroff 😆
Yes, but not for any particularly well explained reason. Same thing with Rupert Sheldrake. Dislike the ideas, but no meaningful explanation of why.
He doesn't want to get fooled, not even by himself.
Thought that was Goldberg in the thumbnail
Stop counting when it's the same..
Synchronicity has been experienced by me and countless others. It is real.
I've never heard of this phenomenon. What happens?
😂...Stuart is definitely not the only one who knows..
And by the way...it's egocentric to think this is the macroscopic world. It is, but only from a human perspective.
Quantum particles are underteminate. Particles real world are unpredicted. Otherwise conscieness hasnt Works to figuret out particles reality. He is so confusion about particles when he has honest phichs concept. Unfortunetly he Not show up how particles phisch in time. Certainly fundamental theory phisch didnt it.
Holy crapola... Plants can do it!
Yep, photosynthesis.
The Microscopic is Everywhere Within and All Around the Macroscopic! Without Entanglement nothing is Possible not even Locality itself! Begin with an All Encompassing Nonlocality(the Canvas) to get many Possible Local regions Within it(Things/objects etc) as the Art of Continuous Creation!.
as a " young " man i was very much into Jung im not anymore yet if i remember correctly: if it is what it was if it is there is no scientific proof ever possible - that´s the trick...(Mephisto)
☀️
Wow this guy is cracked. But I'm sure I'll be eating my works just as soon as he publishes that paper. :P
Just drink Brawndo its got electro lights !! It's what plants crave !!
I’m here at 20k views
I sin this dude on piers Morgan talks to serial killers
no 'event' is separate, our viewing of things in patterns comes from the illusion of linear form and 'order'... u can thank European ideology for the confusion
Entanglement/Nonlocality is Beyond Speed or any Limitation it's the Central Character of the Medium of All Existence/Creation!.
Backward Time was first proposed over 100 years ago(Sidis) and endorsed by Feynman. There are also a number of Arxiv papers on this.
The key to a better understanding of Gravity would be to utilise Backward Time.
I tend to agree. But it still feels like we are picking apart how a creator goes about his business
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
The word quantum is to woo as champagne is to wines.
Consciousness is mysterious. Quantum is non-intuitive and some find it mysterious. Ergo quantum generates consciousness. I see it clearly now. So obvious. /sarcasm
I wonder if quantum events occur in warm wet bottles of snake oil? You know Penrose is getting older now and I somehow feel like this guy is using Penrose to further his own interests. Someone has got to look out for good ol' Roger who will follow an interesting thought or concept and trusts those around him, that being said I think that these were filmed a while ago
I love Penrose
Synchronicity is not a scientific quantity. Hell, even those ego seeking shards on Tedtalks have ceased using this ancient fluff & puff scam word.
Dang, I don't understand why the interviewer seems so sure of himself and ready to deride this dude; that ain't science. Let the man bear his case before his peers in an open forum. Till then stfu with your objections
It would be nice if someone somewhere would read my original papers and my book showing that this “backward in time” effect is the only possible way that brains and universes can possibly exist. We are leaving out half the Universe. I explain how and why and introduce a scientific methodology for demonstrating this which has been independently verified. I used to teach experimental methodology at Emory University and I left graduate school to write the papers and book because the paradigm of brain and mind was fundamentally flawed and paradoxical.
It heartens me in the extreme to see this. No one would listen to me all these years and I never caved in or let go because I am right. When everything fits together into a coherent picture, that is a valid epistemological point. No one can say that you put the puzzle together wrong -even if it isn’t complete. I have both experimental evidence AND this total epistemological picture. The reason no one listens is the exact reason Stuart Hameroff says. Even if they want to entertain their own theories, fine. But you cannot avoid the paradoxes and you cannot “fudge” what the connection of mind and matter actually are. Or the mechanism of how they relate to human and universal history. If you merely say “things are not separate” then you have merely embarked upon a journey. Whereas I have been on that journey for a long time. Now, Like Darwin on the Beagle, I am coming home. I am bringing it all together. My second book is nearly complete. I unlock a lot of meaning, a lot of relationships in modern history and technology.
My first book is the foundation and mechanics of the backward in time effect. It was called “The Textbook of the Universe: The Genetic Ascent to God” published in 2003 after a couple years traveling around the world presenting papers and my own years of unique research. I keep trying. That’s all I can do. My friends who know me talk about when all the predictions I make come true as “the world catching up”. It would be nice if they would hurry up. I live in my car because I never will give up. It’s not just principle either. This stuff is VITALLY IMPORTANT. I love people and I want them to have a future. Thanks 🙏🏻 for listening if you did. ❤️🔥
And as for a “panacea” of the effect, I would not have even began writing if I did not account for that at the outset. Perhaps that’s why people don’t understand-they are stuck on a lot of paradoxical stumbling blocks which I see as hurdles in my track and field practice. Looking beyond and over hurdles let’s you see the air above them where you can fit through. Don’t stare at the hurdle and fail to try. Do not slow down in fear or you won’t clear it. Thanks 🙏🏻 GREAT point! I look at these things so differently that it’s hard to see what people consider a “hurdle”. Thanks 🙏🏻 again for all these beautiful interviews and ideas. Extremely important and helpful ❤️🔥🥰
And yes I am a runner. USATF track and field, and I run marathons (Boston in 2018) and ultramarathons. I set the policy for transgender runners for the world marathon majors too. By accident Lol 😂 I hope you have a great day and remember that the world needs positive vibes and you do too! Stay positive people! 😘
One of the few times it seems Kuhn just doesn't let someone explain their theory. I mean, my God! Consider how much more tolerant he is of all the theist he has on his channel with claims so much more questionable than what is being proposed here.
*" Consider how much more tolerant he is of all the theist he has on his channel with claims so much more questionable than what is being proposed here."*
.... Theists operate using a metaphysical foundation from the get-go. Everything a theist proposes comes from that type of ideology. However, the moment a theist starts embedding science into their arguments, ... _RLK pounces on them._
Scientists operate using an observable, materialist foundation. Everything a scientist proposes comes from that type of ideology. However, the moment a scientist starts embedding metaphysical properties into their arguments, ... _RLK pounces on them._
RLK is an equal opportunity "pouncer."
It should be obvious that this is just an excerpt of a much longer interview.
Stuart needs a lot of explaining and evidence to do. His argument was really weak.
rubbish!
huice boys
I think this guy use to sell used cars.
We can see these effects when we dream vividly
Modello ORCH OR