Mann-Whitney U test on SPSS with write up (APA style)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ต.ค. 2024
  • Learn how to complete a Mann-Whitney U test on SPSS and how to report the results in APA style.
    Note: the APA symbol for median is Mdn, not Md (like in the example).
    Here is the formula for calculating the r value: Z/(√N)
    (If there's a minus symbol before your Z value, you can ignore it.)
    Here is the formula with the values from the example inputted: 3.22/(√20) = .72
    If you copy and paste 3.22/(√20) into Google and replace the Z and N values with your own, you'll be able to calculate your own r value.
    According to Cohen (1988), r values above .1 can be described as small, values above .3 can be described as moderate, and values above .5 can be described as large.
    Cohen, J.W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edn). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

ความคิดเห็น • 73

  • @DavidRobinsonPhD
    @DavidRobinsonPhD  5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Mann-Whitney U tests and many other analyses are covered in my book, SPSS Made Easy:
    www.amazon.co.uk/SPSS-Made-Easy-Statistical-Researchers/dp/B0DJGR4Z5K

  • @Jennifer-hs5ps
    @Jennifer-hs5ps 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Ahhhh, apparently this is the channel to go to for interpretation and reporting analyses! Thanks again!

  • @elisabethks9773
    @elisabethks9773 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I never write in the comment section of youtube! But my guy you helped me so muchhhh you can't even imagine what i went through to understand how this whole think works and you just made it so simple thank you so much!!!!!!!!!!!1

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks Elisabeth, glad it helped!

  • @hazeldemaeijer2685
    @hazeldemaeijer2685 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi - just wanted to say massive thank you for this video. I'm doing a write up for my MSc and doing a mix of correlations and Mann Whitney U, which I had never done before,...I was feeling major stress about how I was going to tackle something new on a program I don't really have much love for at the moment, as well as interpret the output, and then how to write it all up in APA formatting, but this short video gave me EVERYTHINGI needed to smash out my results section for that part in one go and really reassured me that it wasn't too complicated! So thank you :)

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Hazel, thanks your message, glad the video helped!

  • @dwara6358
    @dwara6358 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your explanation is very clear. Thank you so much. Now I can do my analysis part without having any doubt 😊

  • @HelicosAnalytics
    @HelicosAnalytics ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is an awesome presentation. Thanks Doc.

  • @marianoezequielzalazarcarr8927
    @marianoezequielzalazarcarr8927 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hi david! (I am the guy from Argentina who greeted you earlier in the video of the logistic regresion). My question is about the following: I have carried out the analysis U of mann whitney, the p value is .002, but when it comes to checking the medians, both groups have the same result, as I interpret that?

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi Mariano, thanks for your question. There's an explanation of this here: stats.oarc.ucla.edu/other/mult-pkg/faq/general/faq-why-is-the-mann-whitney-significant-when-the-medians-are-equal/

  • @pharohmonk
    @pharohmonk ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent video. Thanks for the explanation.

  • @sandram.3305
    @sandram.3305 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you! Regards from Bosnia and Herzegovina.

  • @riinatuokko4922
    @riinatuokko4922 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you very much for your advice. I made it! ☺️👍☀️

  • @zsanettkukucska8213
    @zsanettkukucska8213 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you so much - most decent explanation video on youtube in this topic lol

  • @jamiehenry7081
    @jamiehenry7081 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks so much 🙏 this was soooo helpful!

  • @HauntedBlack
    @HauntedBlack ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this video! Question: Can you use the formula for r when you have unequal sample size (example: 40 and 18)?
    And why do you need report medians?

  • @hayleyspurin8286
    @hayleyspurin8286 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really excellent explanation, thank you.

  • @Fenix1445
    @Fenix1445 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi David. What do you mean by this? "(If there's a minus symbol before your Z value, you can ignore it.)"

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Luis, thanks for your question. For example, if the z value in SPSS is -3.22, you can ignore the minus symbol so that you divide positive 3.22 by the square root of N to get a positive r value. This is recommended in, e.g., the SPSS Survival Manual, I suppose because it’s more conventional to report positive effect size statistics.

    • @joseluisalves5829
      @joseluisalves5829 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@DavidRobinsonPhD Thank you for your reply David. So for that calculation with the square root to find the r value I will discard the minus. What about when reporting apa style? can the minus also be discarded?

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@joseluisalves5829 Couldn't see anything in the APA publication manual about this specifically. However, I would opt not to include the minus symbol as long as the direction of the effect has been established (e.g., you've stated which group has the higher median).

  • @sharikzamir4373
    @sharikzamir4373 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very informative and helpful :)
    💯

  • @sarmisthaboruah3972
    @sarmisthaboruah3972 ปีที่แล้ว

    How can i calcuate the IQR for each category/option as i want to report the IQR along with median

  • @fobioma5545
    @fobioma5545 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This was extremely helpful! You have a new subscriber here :) Any idea how to present the results in a table? I have several analysis to run and it would take too much space to write it all out.

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Ihuoma,
      Thanks for your question. A few people have asked about tables recently, so will be sure to include them in future videos.
      Here's a good example of a Mann-Whitney table: www.researchgate.net/figure/Mann-Whitney-U-test-for-significance-of-social-vulnerability-for-highly-engaged-and-or_tbl2_303096277
      Let me know if you have any questions.
      All the best,
      David.

    • @fobioma5545
      @fobioma5545 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DavidRobinsonPhD Thank you very much!

  • @pradeeparanaweera873
    @pradeeparanaweera873 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video, thank you. if the data set contained several zeros, How do conduct this test?

  • @faridabnb5227
    @faridabnb5227 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello David, I have a question if you don't mind, i have pre test scores and post scores which means after my treatment group took the treatment,, the control group didn't take the treatment,but had both tests and the treatment group had both tests and the treatment in between so here , should i do the mann whitney test with post test scores only for both groups ?to see any significant difference between the groups
    Second ,when you counted the r value the z value was in your table -3.215 but you took only 3.215 , it was

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Farida, thanks for your questions. Yes, this test could be used to complete between-group comparisons post-treatment. It could also be used to check that there weren't between-group differences pre-treatment. Regarding the r value, the video description might help to answer your question.

    • @faridabnb5227
      @faridabnb5227 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DavidRobinsonPhD thanks a lot for your answer

    • @faridabnb5227
      @faridabnb5227 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@DavidRobinsonPhD hello David , please can you help ,i have a question,, my post test data is not normally distrbuted and i have an outlier that i did not remove, so i used the Mann Whitney u test to compare ,however my pre test data are normally distrbuted, so i wanted to use the same test to see any difference betwen my treatment and control groups before the treatment period . Is it ok for the type of test with pre test data? The sample is 46 students ,26 treatment and 21 control,the variances are equal for the pre test.

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@faridabnb5227 Hi Farida,
      Thanks for your question.
      If you used a Mann-Whitney test for the post-intervention data, to ensure consistency I would probably also use it for the pre-intervention data even if they meet the assumptions for a t-test. You can find a discussion about this subject here: www.researchgate.net/post/Can_I_use_the_T-Test_and_the_Mann-Whitney_in_the_same_analysis
      Best wishes,
      David.

    • @faridabnb5227
      @faridabnb5227 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DavidRobinsonPhD thank you so much for your answer ,i will mention in my study ,as you said, that i used Mann Whitney u test for pre test data for the sake of consistency .

  • @amrotarrisi2658
    @amrotarrisi2658 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you very much , very much informative

  • @wenboguo2238
    @wenboguo2238 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you!!

  • @andrrrrew
    @andrrrrew ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you!!!

  • @sidrakanwal2097
    @sidrakanwal2097 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi ,I amhave a question if the grouo have different distribution in tow group three we have to report median rank,can you please let us know how to interpret median rank

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Sidra, thanks for your question. Higher ranks reflect higher scores.

    • @sidrakanwal2097
      @sidrakanwal2097 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DavidRobinsonPhD I have one interpretation that means rank of change of bmi in control is high and intervention groups is low. Does this mean change n bmi in control was high??

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sidrakanwal2097 If the mean rank for change scores is higher in the control condition than in the intervention condition, this indicates that, overall, change scores are higher in the control condition. However, this could be misleading if you have negative values in your dataset.

  • @Kayla-dr5hv
    @Kayla-dr5hv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi David, is there any reason that my variable labels don't automatically change from a number in the data view tab to the label I created in the variable view tab? I have tried the SINTAX method too - no luck. Any help would be greatly appreciated, thank you!

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Kayla,
      Thanks for your question.
      If you go to View then click Value Labels, your numbers should be replaced by labels.
      Best,
      David.

  • @tsheringyenji3941
    @tsheringyenji3941 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi
    I have a question... Can the data set be non-significant for Mann-whitney U test. After running Man whitney test my p value is greater than .05. Can i still interpret this result?

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi, thanks for your question. Yes, that just means that there's not a significant difference between the groups.

    • @tsheringyenji3941
      @tsheringyenji3941 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DavidRobinsonPhD Thank you sir for your quick response. I have one more question..... which table do we use to report our analysis. I want add a table in my paper, so do we use the Ranks table or Test Statistics table generated by SPSS? Thank you.

  • @tbbek17
    @tbbek17 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    the effect size of .72 - did you use Cohens D? how do you derive that it was a large effect when Cohen's D large effect is 0.8 (sorry very confused).

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Tracy,
      Thanks for your question. In this case the effect size value is an approximate r value rather than a d value, and the criteria are different. For example, while a d value normally needs to be above .8 to be described as "large", an r value only needs to be above .5.
      Hope that helps!
      David.

    • @Tiaaa2010x
      @Tiaaa2010x 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@DavidRobinsonPhD Hi David, what if my effect size is .28 as this is lower than .5, do I still report this?

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Tiaaa2010x I would still report it, though would describe it as "small" rather than "large" (see Cohen's criteria in the description).

    • @Tiaaa2010x
      @Tiaaa2010x 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DavidRobinsonPhD perfect thank you :)

  • @elinagailite6954
    @elinagailite6954 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sometimes medians are equal even when Mann-Whitney shows significant difference. This makes me think that one cannot make any conclusions by using only medians. Any comments how data should be interpreted? Which figures shall be used in interpretation?

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, normally the p value is the most interesting value in the output. As you allude to, the medians might look quite similar or quite different, but usually what we're interested in is whether the p value suggests a significant difference; medians could seem quite distinct but the difference could still be non-significant as sample size affects the likelihood of a difference being significant.

  • @lucinena9478
    @lucinena9478 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If I want to make pies which number (means or media) need I use?

    • @IslandRides
      @IslandRides 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Luci,
      Thanks for your question.
      If you're referring to pie charts, these aren't usually used to represent means or medians, but rather how many (or what percentage of) people are in a certain group or responded a certain way.
      Best wishes,
      David.

    • @lucinena9478
      @lucinena9478 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@IslandRides I measure motor ability in norms and I thought of representing with bar graphs.
      Thank you very much for the answer. I will wait anxiously for this too

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lucinena9478 If you measured motor ability in two groups, you could represent the medians (or means) for each group in a bar graph.

    • @lucinena9478
      @lucinena9478 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@DavidRobinsonPhD ​ :) thank you so much...

  • @aisya1240
    @aisya1240 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi if the r number is negative do we consider it has a different between two groups too?

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Aisya,
      Thanks for your question.
      Yes, whether it's positive or negative doesn't really matter in the context of this test. I would just report the r value without the minus symbol. To determine whether there's a difference between the conditions, focus on the p value (aka sig value). Regardless of whether the r value is positive or negative, the difference between conditions can be considered significant if the p value is below .05.
      Hope that helps!
      David.

    • @aisya1240
      @aisya1240 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DavidRobinsonPhD
      Very clear and right to the point!Thank you so much Dr for the answer. Your videos really help a lot. Thank you for being such an amazing researcher and helping so many people out. 💖

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@aisya1240 Thank you!

  • @dimitrachorianopoulou7958
    @dimitrachorianopoulou7958 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    the volume is always too low in your videos