I get it. This is SUPER sensitive subject in the U.S. to this day. For obvious reasons. Any hint of the "N word" and some music as well most likely (the 2pac song during the shootout at Kandy's estate etc.) probably would get it taken down/blocked. So while I love watching reactors react to this, I know the trouble it could cause.
Tony, Django’s horse, is actually the horse that belongs to Jaime Foxx in real life. He’s called Cheetah and Foxx is essentially an irl cowboy who is an accomplished rider, hence no wires when he did that high up mount
@@VKunia Also it is true for Leo to say his lines and Jamie Foxx and Samuel L Jackson said hell Leo it's just another Tuesday for us. XD Those guys are crazy.
The “KKK” raid discussion scene is one of the funniest things I’ve saw in a movie. “This time I say no bags, but next time we’ll do the bags right and go full regalia” 😂😂 “I think we all think .. the bags was a nice idea but not pointing any fingers, coulda been dun better”😂
been using "shit fire" since i saw this in theatres. Edit: also, i don't think i will ever make it through that scene without laughing at least once, for as long as i live.
I think it's a fascinating and humorous juxtaposition between the monstrousness of what they're doing and how little they care about that monstrousness.
Am I gonna be hanged if I say I don't like this movie? Also will I be executed by a firing squad if I say that out of all the Quentin Tarantino movies Inglourious Basterds is the only one I like?
One detail that I personally love is how Django drops the candle when killing Candie's men just like Schultz dropped the lantern when he killed Ace Speck
Hey VK, fun fact, Samuel L Jackson, in an interview, was asked about being cast for Stephen, and he said Tarantino sent him the script, then called him to see what he thought about it, and Jackson said, "So, you want me to play the worst negro in the history of films?" Tarantino said, "Uh, yeah." Jackson said, "OK". lol
Because he knew he could trust Tarantino to avoid making him look stupid. He's worked with that man enough to believe in his vision of what the movie will come out like
At least you didn't claim that he did the entire scene, and was actually rubbing his real blood on the actress' face without her being aware it would happen, like so many other people do.
@@EidlonesIt’s not false. DiCaprio absolutely cut his hand in that scene and kept going. He wasn’t supposed to smash that glass. What’s not true is him rubbing his real blood on Hilde. They cleaned up his hand of his real blood and then used stage blood for the face wiping scene. This was decided after Tarantino liked how the scene looked with the broken glass and DiCaprio’s cut hand.
My obscure bit of trivia is that the Aussie who was with the character Quentin Tarantino played is John Jarratt, a legendary (if less well known) Aussie actor. His most iconic roles were in the Wolf Creek movies and series. He was invited to cameo because Tarantino was a big fan and always wanted to meet him. Love your reactions and G'Day from Sydney. :)
JJ's most iconic roles, sans Playschool, that is.🤣 That said I reckon there's a reasonable chance of Vicky reacting to Wolf Creek one of these Halloween's.
@MrDarkwing78 Well yeah I didn't think many people who grew up outside Australia would know playschool haha. But yeah that would be fun for Halloween!!
26:22 It's pretty incredible how Leo kept the camera rolling while his hand was really bleeding by accident. That's why he's one of the best actors out there!
dude he really cut himself? I figured. I've cut myself thousands of times by accident and I recognize real blood a million miles away. Something about his hand did seem a bit too real to me.
@@SleepParty30 Yes, he really cut himself. He accidentally hit a glass with the palm of his hand. He got a cut, which I think had to be sewn up with 9 stitches. However, Leo continued to act and sometimes improvised.
@@SleepParty30 he really did cut himself. But don't believe the people who think he actually rubbed his real blood over Kerry Washington's face. It was fake blood at that point.
Up until that shot ended. They would have stitched him up right after Quinten called "cut!" Then that shot of Leo using the blood from his hand on Brunhilda was fake. Because doing that with real blood would have been *very* wrong.
@@darthozlordthat's good to know, I have heard the story of Leo cutting his hand, I was a little clear on whether that was real blood he rubbed on her face.
"I like the way you die boy" "Bye Ms. Laura" "I couldn't resist" "I count 2 guns" "First you had my curiosity, now you have my attention" Such a quotable, well made film. Easily top 3 in Tarantinos catalog
When i watched that movie in a theater (ten years ago! o_o), I thought "AT LAST a masterpiece by Tarantino", because since Pulp Fiction, which is HIS magnum opus to this day imo, I hadn't been super convinced by his films besides the first Kill Bill. It's my second favorite. The movies he made after this one were much, much better. A bit long, but sensational nonetheless.
To expand on the story of Leo being uncomfortable saying the N-word and calling the black actors that in a derogatory way, I believe it was Samuel L Jackson who told him to say it. This totally makes sense cause of the context of where the film takes place, and Jackson loves working on Tarentino's sets.
I saw a panel with them both and they talked about this. When Leo brought up that he was having trouble saying the N-word so much, Samuel L Jackson told him "It's just another Tuesday for us."
32:33 Love how, not only, does the bullet throw her flying, it also changes it's momentum by 90 degrees to send her flying backwards. I always laugh so hard at this scene.
That was done deliberately as a nod to old time westerns. Because censor's wouldn't let them show a woman die on screen any time a female character was shot she was pulled off screen by a rope resulting in some very strange physics.
@@platinumspider7859 emphasized like many/most of the other effects in this movie to almost be a parody of the West genre itself. If she was just pulled back it could look like dubious line work, but pulling out of frame at a ridiculous angle is very obviously a stylistic choice, even if people never knew the history of Westerns.
@@platinumspider7859 I remember reading (and not sure on the veracity, so please correct if wrong) that the QT wanted a stronger pull than they normally do for actors, but she said she could take it at full ratchet pull force... so they did, and they kept it. I really hope it's true, cause it's hilarious if so 🤣🤣🤣
12:54 I love that you feel all "warm and fuzzy" about Christoph Waltz, he is truly awesome. I'd suggest "Inglourious Basterds" next (also a Tarantino film). 😉
Inglourious Basterds is probably my favourite Tarantino film and Waltz is absolutely fantastic in it. Those opening 20 minutes are the most incredibly tense start to any film ever, and his performance just makes that scene almost unbearable to watch
@@christianwise637 I have trouble nailing down my "favourite" Tarantino film. Every time I focus on one I remember eight other awesome things from three other movies. The man is a Master of his Craft.
Christoph's Oscar for Dr. Schultz was well deserved, but with his Hans Landa in "Inglorious Basterds", he delivered his masterpiece. You HAVE to watch that! Also "Kill Bill Vol. I & II"...
Mmhmm. Say what you want about his personal life (which I don't think is all too bad...like yeah, he likes women 20 years younger than him =/ but he doesn't look that old either, and he's a decent guy outside of that), IMO he's the best actor of the 21st century. Has so many bangers. It's like him or only a couple other actors I could think of off the top of my head.
@@CrazeeAdam It's not 20 years older than him. It's 25 years old _maximum._ As soon as they turn 25 he unceremoniously dumps them, so the difference increases as he ages. And it's not _only_ about the age difference (that's maybe the _least_ horrible part of it), there's something seriously creepy about ending a supposedly romantic relationship just because the other person _"got too old"._ Same kind of vibe as bastards who abandon puppies or kittens once they grow up and _"aren't cute any more"._
@@mbpoblet oh yeah don't get me wrong, it's not great thing to do. It's for sure something mental with him to do with age perhaps? With himself. Because outside of that, he seems and by all accounts is a good person. I don't necessarily persecute him like others do because it's clearly something deeply psychological going on that he probably needs help with. And sooner or later, despite him being Leonardo Dicaprio, he won't be able to get another woman because they'll know what will happen. That's how I see it. Hope he does get help with it at some point though. (I guess the other possibility is he finds a woman that he does just genuinely love and he doesn't break up with them)
@@mbpoblet And he forces them to get into the relationship? no? oh so the women are braindead and don't know about this thing EVERYONE KNOWS? no? so maybe both parties getting involved knows where it ends... 20 somethings are still adults the women uses him as much as he uses them it's a mutual beneficial relationship. don't see anyone talking about the women only Leo🤣🤣 unreal double standards
@@kuivia The pattern hasn't become evident until recent years. Anyone dating him _now_ will probably know, but it takes at least three or four cases for it to start being suspicious of not being coincidence. So the first three or four, at the very least, _couldn't_ have known. Not that them knowing would make him any less creepy, of course. Them agreeing to it or not is entirely irrelevant.
Fun fact: When Leonardo did the scene where he was threatening to kill Django‘s wife at the dinner table, he cut his hand FOR REAL, like that’s all real blood, but he did the scene anyway. He got a standing ovation from the crew afterwards… just goes to show how great an actor he is.
Wrong. So very wrong. It's NOT real blood. He did cut his hand but it was bandaged and they stopped to make this scene. Please don't spread misinformation like that
Django is probably my all-time favorite Tarantino film. The actors all did their absolute best, it touched on realistic dark subject matter very well and didn't shy away from what the world was at one point (cruel, unlawful and alone in most areas), and overall was a solid story and writing with a great pace. Not a particular fan of westerns but the style and everything on this movie is near perfect for me
This movie is so incredibly awesome; the end gets all the cathartic headlines, but I love the setup the most, getting to know the doctor and watching him teach Django everything he needs to know to thrive as a bounty hunter, most importantly how to disarm his opponents with pure, unadulterated reason as we see in the last act. And I LOVE it when they get to Don Johnson's plantation and he introduces himself, Django AND the horses. It shows the deep-seeded decency the doctor has (his ease with shooting wanted criminals being an interesting facet of his decency), and it also explains why, when he said "he couldn't resist" when he shot Candie, it was - again - the literal truth. Candie was so vile, even knowing he was effectively killing himself in the process, he saw the singular opportunity to remove such a vile POS, responsible for the misery of so many others, as more than worth the exchange.
Such a great movie! Couple things: It's called Candyland because Leo's character's name is Calvin Candie! Also you had already seen Quentin Tarantino in the movie before the Lequint Dickie Mining Co. scene, he was the klan member who said "I thank we all thank the bag was a nice idea but not pointin' any fangers they could've been done better"
@@patrickevans9604 Tarantino played two characters in Django Unchained. First, Robert - or Bag Head #1 - in the scene where Spencer “Big Daddy” Bennet (Don Johnson) and all his henchmen go from discussing how to attack Dr. Schultz (Christoph Waltz) and Django (Jamie Foxx) to complaining about how badly done their bag-masks were. Later on in the story, he played Frankie, an Australian miner (with a terrible accent)
Fun fact, Leo actually cut his hand during the diner scene rant, but was so into the role that he went with it and didn't tell them to stop filming, so that cut and blood is real.
I love Christoph Waltz's character in this film. It is almost like Tarantino got him back to play this character by telling him he would get the chance to (figuratively speaking) take out his character from Inglorious Basterds. The hook: both Hans Landa and Calvin Candie have these long, drawn-out monologues that are meant to sound like well-educated discussions on "the nature of things", until you back out of the tension of the scene and realize that what they are saying is absolutely monstrous, inhuman, and irredeemably evil. As Dr. Schultz said, "I couldn't resist."
One of my favorite movies. Glad more people keep finding it. Will Smith was originally picked to play Django but turned it down. It was too aggressive for him. Waltz won an Oscar for it. I'm SHOCKED Leo or Samuel didn't win one either.
It is always fun to watch Leonardo DiCaprio get intense and physical in his performances. After "Titanic" came out, he was considered a teen idol and thus generated a backlash at no fault to him. He has been proving the naysayers wrong ever since, even though he had some intense roles before that.
Just to clarafy, the gun that shot that dude is a Sharps Carbine, in the hands of a man with talent can most certainly reach out that far. Once cartridges were invented, even 100+ year old guns were and still are incredibly accurate and effective, the only difference is they didnt have 30 shots. Just one or two. Or in some cases a few more.
And to answer your question, yes mandingo fighting was definitely a real thing back then. Also, you did hear right about Leo being hesitant to use such harshly racist language in the film because he wasn't sure how well it would go over with audiences but Samuel L Jackson talked him into the mindset by telling him if he held back viewers would know it and he'd be hated more for that than playing into the role. "It's just another Tuesday for us mother #$%#÷=" was the words Sam claimed to have used with his pep talk
@@jackprescott9652 If you don't accept multiple accounts of black boxers who come from a background of slavery who stated that they learned how to do it so well being pitted against other slaves...then sure, no evidence.
@@rogercline5377 Agree to 'wasn't a thing' ... per se, but very likely happened occasionally with high stakes ... rich white people (slave owners) gonna do rich white people shit.
I love how Dr Shultz makes Django a better person: teaches him to read, shows him manners, turns him into a sharp shooter. The pride on his face in that one scene is priceless
Trivia: Ending song, Theme Song from 1970 spaghetti western comedy, They Call Me Trinity(Trinity Series)… and Django’s name comes from another spaghetti western franchise self titled Django(1966)-- in fact the original Django(Franco Nero who also played General Ramon Esperanza in Die Hard 2), also makes a quick cameo appearance-- he’s the fine dressed gentleman at the bar, with the cotton white gloves(an Easter egg throwback to his character’s condition in the original film) when King Schultz and Django first meet Calvin Candie--that’s how he “knows” that the “D” in Django “is silent”. 😊 Also Leo actually did deeply cut his hand during the dinner scene and unintentionally splattered blood on Kerry Washington-- which is why her reaction looks so real-- that’s because it is legitimate shock… 😮
At 8:53, it is well within the effective distance of a Sharps Rifle. Making the shot, however, would be extremely difficult as the target was moving quickly on a horse.
Leo did have an issue with the n-word, yes. But Jamie and Sam essentially set him straight. It just wouldn't make sense for an evil slave owner not to say that word.
Right.. but as a pretty good guy (as far as I've heard) in real life, surrounded by a lot of his black coworkers, I could for sure see it being difficult for him. He wasn't brought up to say that word (like any decent person)... and so.. yeah. I think it says a lot about HIM as an individual that it wasn't easy for him.. even if it's just acting.
There's a show on Netflix called "Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee" and Christoph Waltz is a guest on one of the episodes. He's truly a delightful human and I want to be his friend
Fun fact - There are actually a lot of people who don’t know or don’t consider Dumas to be a black man as he was biracial. The books he wrote about The Three Musketeers and D’Artagnan were my fathers favorite and something he shared with me growing up. I would actually do my Black History Month report on Dumas and a few of my teachers back in the day tried to reject my report before I educated them.
Tarantino DID IT AGAIN WITH THIS FILM he took a dangerous and painfull subject and portrayed it from all sides fantastic acting all around excellent Story.
This is an absolutely fantastic movie in many, many ways. The fact that it has so much humor blended in with action and some of the worst language/treatment you can imagine...it's just astounding that it was paced so well and can make you cringe one moment and giggle the next. I *love* how Dr. Schultz wouldn't say "auf wiedersehen" to Candie because it meant 'til I see you again' because he never wanted to see him again. He wanted him completely gone. But then when Django says goodbye to Schultz he whispers "auf wiedersehen" to him because Schultz helped give him back everything he wanted, but sacrificed himself in the process. It's such an honorable tribute and I love the dynamic between the 2 of them. This is such a damn good movie. Tarantino has some really good movies. I love 'Kill Bill Vol 1 + 2', but overall I think Django may be his best overall movie. Yes, I went there.
I believe Shultz had a Sharps Rifle, so that long range shot he takes of one of the Brittle brothers at that first plantation would have been absolutely possible, and quite easy for a good shot at that range. The practical effective range of that rifle was around 1,000 yards (maximum effective range up to 3,000 yards). The shot he takes is no more than 200-300 yards.
"They could never make Blazing Saddles today!" They made *this* movie - which was ALSO about: A black hero starting from the bottom of society, stumbling into a position of authority by a stroke of dumb luck, who teams up with a more experienced white gunslinger and brings justice to the unjust. There's a even a scene where they lure the racist bad guys into a trap with a childish trick and blow them up by detonating a cache of explosives with a long-distance sniper shot. N-word count: BS-38, Django - *One hundred eleven*
Quentin tarantino went boom, love how he gets into his own movies,love all of his movies has some interesting characters, and Christopher waltz is so good in anything he's in, plays a great but different character in inglourious basterds. Or as a farther figure in Alita Battle Angle
Fun fact: during the scene where Candie threatens Dr Schulz and Django, when Leo slams his hand on the table he breaks a wine glass and cuts himself on it and smears his blood over Hildy’s face. The blood smeared on Hildy’s face is fake, but the breaking of the wine glass was unscripted, and the blood we see on Leo’s hand is real. He actually cut himself by breaking that glass accidentally and continued the scene, severely bleeding hand and all.
First reaction I've watched of yours, and totally agree with your love for Waltz. His characters are always the best. His ability to be likeable whether good or bad is amazing. That being said, good god could you be anymore virtue signalling?! We get it, slavery was terrible but bloody hell you don't have to keep making sure we know you think it is. TH-camr and youngsters in general these days are so fascinated in trying to make sure they say and do everything that makes them seem a 'great person'.
20:55 Apparently when Tarantino brought Jackson the script, Jackson said something like "you bring me this script when it's ten years too late for me to play the lead role, and you ask me to play the most despicable negro character in movie history?", Tarantino said 'yeah' and Jackson said 'alright then lets do it'. Can definitely see how he was going for 'despicable' with his portrayal.
This and Wolf of Wall Street are two movies where Leo 100% understood the assignment and his characters are so morally reprehensible. But I could never imagine anybody but Leo playing them.
Yep, and it's often used disparagingly by them against others. Someone should be more outraged by usage now, when those people are calling each other the same thing. If she isn't complaining about that, then she's a hypocrite.
Dr. Schultz walked into a tavern, kicked the owner out, killed the sheriff, and got paid two hundred dollars for it all by the US Marshall. Fucking boss.
While some historians claimed that there was no recorded history of any Mandingo fights. Slaves were purely economic and to buy a slave for the use of battle would be detrimental to the slave owners. David Blight, the director of Yale’s Center for the Study of Slavery, mentioned in an interview about the historical accuracy of Mandingo Fighting, “The reason slave owners wouldn’t have pitted their slaves against each other in such a way is strictly economic. Slavery was built upon money, and the fortune to be made for owners was in buying, selling, and working them, not in sending them out to fight at the risk of death.” Blight argued that Tarantino was most likely inspired by the 1970’s book/movie Mandingo where a slave is purchased solely to get into fights with other slaves. However, Slave Fights did occur. Many slaves were pitted in “Bare Knuckle Brawls” and other savage battles with other slaves. In fact, many freed slaves after the Civil War began to train boxers in the style of Bare Knuckle Brawling.
I love this movie so much because while most movies make me want to root for the "good guy", this one makes me want to actively root against the bad guys. I didn't just want Django to be victorious, I totally wanted him to kill them all at the end and most movies can't make me feel that way.
hey @ 9:00 you said with that gun at that distance he can’t hit that shot, well i’m here to tell you this rifles could accurately hit a target up to 450yards away. QT said in an interview the editing took a couple of scenes out, DR. Schultz is suppose to talk about distance and he sets his rifle for 250yds then blows him down after the sequence we saw. the original cut was 4 hours long, even after editing it was still too long they had to cut more and more out. still waiting on that Directors cut. one of my all time favorite movies i’ve seen it atleast 20 times
The Italian man at the club who's mandingo lost the fight and who asks Django what his name was also played a character called Django in a Western movie in either the 60s or the 70s (they use half of the soundtrack from that movie for this movie). That's why when our Django said 'the d is silent' the original Django said 'I know'.
8:55 I'd wager that particular rifle could hit someone at that distance, because it's a Sharps rifle. Sharps rifles are renowned for their incredible long-range accuracy even in those times. The only inaccuracy in that scene is that rifle wouldn't have been introduced until about twenty years later, if I remember right.
The rifle that Dr. Shultz uses in this movie is a Sharps Model 1874 Buffalo, while it technically did not exist in 1858, the rifle would most definitely be able to make those long range shots... with ease. Whether it be a rifle in 1858 or 1874... the effective range is about 1000 yards or 910 meters and it's probably firing 45-70. Love your reactions but I just wanted to point that out.
8:48 the Sharps 1874 Buffalo rifle could easily make the shot with a competent marksman behind it. Unfortunately, that rifle is an anachronism in this film since it is set two decades before that rifle was produced.
No, it's not a "Southern Thing." Historically, families showed affection differently than now, hand-holding, snuggles, and even quick smooches on the lips not unusual, particularly between siblings and cousins, which is part of why Nick and Daisy seem particularly close in the Great Gatsby, especially in the Baz Luhrmann version.
Interestingly enough, I believe that those long shots with an open-sight rifle are possible, I would recommend that you check out the Mathew Quigley Buffalo rifle match, where contestants regularly make shots much farther than that, with rifles of the same era.
17:37 I had heard Leo had some hesitation with his lines and Samuel L Jackson told him “this is just another day for us” (I’m paraphrasing but you understand)
The shot on Ellis Brittle would definitely be possible for an experienced marksman. Extremely difficult, but possible nonetheless. That rifle is accurate up to 1,000 yards in the right hands, and capable of operating somewhat accurately at even greater distances.
Around 17:30 DeCaprio had trouble with the lines, but he rehearsed them with Samuel L. Jackson who helped him. DeCaprio is a good actor, and part of getting into character is that mindset.
8:55 not possible with that gun? That's a Sharps rifle, which has confirmed kill shots during the civil war at a 1000 yards, and unconfirmed shots at 3 times that distance. A couple hundred yards with a Sharps really wouldn't be a challenge for an experienced marksman. Not saying it's an easy shot by any means, but definitely doable.
hell fking yeah you remember that music from quidditch game! me too my favorite game growing up!!! ps watched so many ur videos and liked them. keep them up.
This was supposed to be up but youtube kept giving me troubles 🥲🥲 So if the video gets blocked in the future, this is the warning!
Whats wrong w Leo & his 25 year old women? Things expire 🙂
@@jerseyfky Wow, charming.
I get it. This is SUPER sensitive subject in the U.S. to this day. For obvious reasons. Any hint of the "N word" and some music as well most likely (the 2pac song during the shootout at Kandy's estate etc.) probably would get it taken down/blocked. So while I love watching reactors react to this, I know the trouble it could cause.
Keep on Truckin', Vicky, we're with you. 👍
Not 100% sure about yt and nudity, expecially from that angle 🤭
Tony, Django’s horse, is actually the horse that belongs to Jaime Foxx in real life. He’s called Cheetah and Foxx is essentially an irl cowboy who is an accomplished rider, hence no wires when he did that high up mount
This movie is 10 years old and feels like it was released yesterday. I give this movie a "Five Wanted Bounty Heads Out Of Five."
hey why don't you stop making me feel old as shit
True.
"The D is silent."
"I know."
Franco Nero's character acknowledging Django is fitting because he originally played the character before.
The farewell kiss Django gives Shultz to say good bye one last time is so beautiful.
after explaining that "Auf Wiedersehen" Means "until we see each other again"
Nominated for 6 Oscars including Best Picture but won for Best Supporting Actor Christoph Waltz and Best Original Screenplay
And would have won 2 best supporting actors if possible :p
LOVE Christoph Waltz he deserves it!
They forgot to get Leo DiCaprio a nod fgor his performance in this.
@@jackprescott9652 Because the awards are about diversity, not talent.
@@VKunia Also it is true for Leo to say his lines and Jamie Foxx and Samuel L Jackson said hell Leo it's just another Tuesday for us. XD Those guys are crazy.
"It's not like a xenomorph has entered and tried to order a beer!"
You're right.
I believe that movie is called Spaceballs.
"Hello my baby, hello my honey...."
"Check please"
The “KKK” raid discussion scene is one of the funniest things I’ve saw in a movie. “This time I say no bags, but next time we’ll do the bags right and go full regalia” 😂😂
“I think we all think .. the bags was a nice idea but not pointing any fingers, coulda been dun better”😂
Every once and a while I'll just remember "Ah can't see SHIT!!" and start laughing. lol
as much as i love that, the whole don johnson scene takes the cake.
been using "shit fire" since i saw this in theatres.
Edit: also, i don't think i will ever make it through that scene without laughing at least once, for as long as i live.
As a black man I couldn't be offended by that scene coz I was laughing so hard.
I think it's a fascinating and humorous juxtaposition between the monstrousness of what they're doing and how little they care about that monstrousness.
“The blood is very dramatic.”
You just described almost every Quentin Tarantino movie 😅
As Epic Rap Battles would say, Tarantino would find a way to get arterial spray from stubbing a toe.
@@DaemonKeido hahahahaha man that battle was so good
Was going to say essentially the same thing about kind of having to expect some splatter in a Tarantino flick.
Am I gonna be hanged if I say I don't like this movie?
Also will I be executed by a firing squad if I say that out of all the Quentin Tarantino movies Inglourious Basterds is the only one I like?
@@cashewnuttel9054 Yes and Yes.
One detail that I personally love is how Django drops the candle when killing Candie's men just like Schultz dropped the lantern when he killed Ace Speck
Hey VK, fun fact, Samuel L Jackson, in an interview, was asked about being cast for Stephen, and he said Tarantino sent him the script, then called him to see what he thought about it, and Jackson said, "So, you want me to play the worst negro in the history of films?" Tarantino said, "Uh, yeah." Jackson said, "OK". lol
Because he knew he could trust Tarantino to avoid making him look stupid. He's worked with that man enough to believe in his vision of what the movie will come out like
@@patrickevans9604 It was probably also important for him to hear Tarantino acknowledge Jackson's take on that character as written.
🤣🤣🤣
@cxff33 what?
10:45 “Good for you! Defend your wife!…Stop being racist, while you’re at it!” I laughed so hard I hurt inside. Well said.
" so are the bag on or off?" That got me
@@TheOGgUeRiLlaMoDe Did it aye
Fun fact Leo actually cut his hand up pretty good but kept going till the shot was over before they tended to it. Thats dedication right there
At least you didn't claim that he did the entire scene, and was actually rubbing his real blood on the actress' face without her being aware it would happen, like so many other people do.
Like how he keeps going till his current Girlfriend is 25. Dedication!
@@Eidlones I admit that there's a LOT of blood on his hand and that would be extra-extra-dedication, but where did you read or hear that?
@SCharlesDennicon Look at any Django reaction, the comments section will be filled with people claiming it. It's false tho
@@EidlonesIt’s not false. DiCaprio absolutely cut his hand in that scene and kept going. He wasn’t supposed to smash that glass. What’s not true is him rubbing his real blood on Hilde. They cleaned up his hand of his real blood and then used stage blood for the face wiping scene. This was decided after Tarantino liked how the scene looked with the broken glass and DiCaprio’s cut hand.
My obscure bit of trivia is that the Aussie who was with the character Quentin Tarantino played is John Jarratt, a legendary (if less well known) Aussie actor. His most iconic roles were in the Wolf Creek movies and series. He was invited to cameo because Tarantino was a big fan and always wanted to meet him. Love your reactions and G'Day from Sydney. :)
JJ's most iconic roles, sans Playschool, that is.🤣 That said I reckon there's a reasonable chance of Vicky reacting to Wolf Creek one of these Halloween's.
@MrDarkwing78 Well yeah I didn't think many people who grew up outside Australia would know playschool haha. But yeah that would be fun for Halloween!!
26:22 It's pretty incredible how Leo kept the camera rolling while his hand was really bleeding by accident. That's why he's one of the best actors out there!
dude he really cut himself? I figured. I've cut myself thousands of times by accident and I recognize real blood a million miles away. Something about his hand did seem a bit too real to me.
@@SleepParty30 Yes, he really cut himself. He accidentally hit a glass with the palm of his hand. He got a cut, which I think had to be sewn up with 9 stitches.
However, Leo continued to act and sometimes improvised.
@@SleepParty30 he really did cut himself. But don't believe the people who think he actually rubbed his real blood over Kerry Washington's face. It was fake blood at that point.
Up until that shot ended. They would have stitched him up right after Quinten called "cut!" Then that shot of Leo using the blood from his hand on Brunhilda was fake. Because doing that with real blood would have been *very* wrong.
@@darthozlordthat's good to know, I have heard the story of Leo cutting his hand, I was a little clear on whether that was real blood he rubbed on her face.
"I like the way you die boy"
"Bye Ms. Laura"
"I couldn't resist"
"I count 2 guns"
"First you had my curiosity, now you have my attention"
Such a quotable, well made film. Easily top 3 in Tarantinos catalog
Weirdly enough, this is my favorite Tarantino movie. First one I saw in a theater and I will never be able to forget the experience.
Same
When i watched that movie in a theater (ten years ago! o_o), I thought "AT LAST a masterpiece by Tarantino", because since Pulp Fiction, which is HIS magnum opus to this day imo, I hadn't been super convinced by his films besides the first Kill Bill. It's my second favorite. The movies he made after this one were much, much better. A bit long, but sensational nonetheless.
It's my favourite Tarantino movie, too. Only that I didn't have the provilege of seeing it in a theater.
@@SCharlesDennicon Jackie Brown is my least favorite movie from Tarantino, it felt boring despite Sam Jackson and Robert De Niro being in it
The Sharps Buffalo 1874 rifle had an effective range of 500 yards with a confirmed officially recorded the distance at 1,538 yd
To expand on the story of Leo being uncomfortable saying the N-word and calling the black actors that in a derogatory way, I believe it was Samuel L Jackson who told him to say it. This totally makes sense cause of the context of where the film takes place, and Jackson loves working on Tarentino's sets.
I saw a panel with them both and they talked about this. When Leo brought up that he was having trouble saying the N-word so much, Samuel L Jackson told him "It's just another Tuesday for us."
32:33 Love how, not only, does the bullet throw her flying, it also changes it's momentum by 90 degrees to send her flying backwards. I always laugh so hard at this scene.
That was done deliberately as a nod to old time westerns. Because censor's wouldn't let them show a woman die on screen any time a female character was shot she was pulled off screen by a rope resulting in some very strange physics.
@@ianjardine7324 Sure, but they usually fallow the trajectory of the bullet, not take a hard left turn.
@@platinumspider7859 emphasized like many/most of the other effects in this movie to almost be a parody of the West genre itself. If she was just pulled back it could look like dubious line work, but pulling out of frame at a ridiculous angle is very obviously a stylistic choice, even if people never knew the history of Westerns.
@@darksunrise957 Definitely, and hilarious.
@@platinumspider7859 I remember reading (and not sure on the veracity, so please correct if wrong) that the QT wanted a stronger pull than they normally do for actors, but she said she could take it at full ratchet pull force... so they did, and they kept it. I really hope it's true, cause it's hilarious if so 🤣🤣🤣
12:54 I love that you feel all "warm and fuzzy" about Christoph Waltz, he is truly awesome. I'd suggest "Inglourious Basterds" next (also a Tarantino film). 😉
Or the hateful eight, not with Waltz but also very very good
Inglourious Basterds is probably my favourite Tarantino film and Waltz is absolutely fantastic in it. Those opening 20 minutes are the most incredibly tense start to any film ever, and his performance just makes that scene almost unbearable to watch
@@christianwise637 I have trouble nailing down my "favourite" Tarantino film. Every time I focus on one I remember eight other awesome things from three other movies. The man is a Master of his Craft.
I'm pretty sure she saw it already
Christoph's Oscar for Dr. Schultz was well deserved, but with his Hans Landa in "Inglorious Basterds", he delivered his masterpiece.
You HAVE to watch that! Also "Kill Bill Vol. I & II"...
This film solidified why Leo is my favorite actor. This performance is amazing
Mmhmm. Say what you want about his personal life (which I don't think is all too bad...like yeah, he likes women 20 years younger than him =/ but he doesn't look that old either, and he's a decent guy outside of that), IMO he's the best actor of the 21st century. Has so many bangers. It's like him or only a couple other actors I could think of off the top of my head.
@@CrazeeAdam It's not 20 years older than him. It's 25 years old _maximum._ As soon as they turn 25 he unceremoniously dumps them, so the difference increases as he ages. And it's not _only_ about the age difference (that's maybe the _least_ horrible part of it), there's something seriously creepy about ending a supposedly romantic relationship just because the other person _"got too old"._ Same kind of vibe as bastards who abandon puppies or kittens once they grow up and _"aren't cute any more"._
@@mbpoblet oh yeah don't get me wrong, it's not great thing to do. It's for sure something mental with him to do with age perhaps? With himself. Because outside of that, he seems and by all accounts is a good person. I don't necessarily persecute him like others do because it's clearly something deeply psychological going on that he probably needs help with. And sooner or later, despite him being Leonardo Dicaprio, he won't be able to get another woman because they'll know what will happen. That's how I see it. Hope he does get help with it at some point though. (I guess the other possibility is he finds a woman that he does just genuinely love and he doesn't break up with them)
@@mbpoblet And he forces them to get into the relationship? no? oh so the women are braindead and don't know about this thing EVERYONE KNOWS? no? so maybe both parties getting involved knows where it ends... 20 somethings are still adults the women uses him as much as he uses them it's a mutual beneficial relationship. don't see anyone talking about the women only Leo🤣🤣 unreal double standards
@@kuivia The pattern hasn't become evident until recent years. Anyone dating him _now_ will probably know, but it takes at least three or four cases for it to start being suspicious of not being coincidence.
So the first three or four, at the very least, _couldn't_ have known.
Not that them knowing would make him any less creepy, of course. Them agreeing to it or not is entirely irrelevant.
Fun fact: When Leonardo did the scene where he was threatening to kill Django‘s wife at the dinner table, he cut his hand FOR REAL, like that’s all real blood, but he did the scene anyway. He got a standing ovation from the crew afterwards… just goes to show how great an actor he is.
But i'm pretty sure that was not real blood he lubricated in her face.
Wrong. So very wrong. It's NOT real blood. He did cut his hand but it was bandaged and they stopped to make this scene. Please don't spread misinformation like that
this comment is on every Django video
DeadPixel It is, that’s how I learned about it, it’s a good fact lol
@@iCortex1 the only misinformation is that he’s a good actor
Django is probably my all-time favorite Tarantino film. The actors all did their absolute best, it touched on realistic dark subject matter very well and didn't shy away from what the world was at one point (cruel, unlawful and alone in most areas), and overall was a solid story and writing with a great pace. Not a particular fan of westerns but the style and everything on this movie is near perfect for me
This movie is so incredibly awesome; the end gets all the cathartic headlines, but I love the setup the most, getting to know the doctor and watching him teach Django everything he needs to know to thrive as a bounty hunter, most importantly how to disarm his opponents with pure, unadulterated reason as we see in the last act.
And I LOVE it when they get to Don Johnson's plantation and he introduces himself, Django AND the horses. It shows the deep-seeded decency the doctor has (his ease with shooting wanted criminals being an interesting facet of his decency), and it also explains why, when he said "he couldn't resist" when he shot Candie, it was - again - the literal truth. Candie was so vile, even knowing he was effectively killing himself in the process, he saw the singular opportunity to remove such a vile POS, responsible for the misery of so many others, as more than worth the exchange.
Such a great movie! Couple things: It's called Candyland because Leo's character's name is Calvin Candie! Also you had already seen Quentin Tarantino in the movie before the Lequint Dickie Mining Co. scene, he was the klan member who said "I thank we all thank the bag was a nice idea but not pointin' any fangers they could've been done better"
No that was not Tarantino lol. Quentin was one of the aussie slavers, more specifically the one that got blown up
@@patrickevans9604 Both were Tarantino.
@@patrickevans9604 He was both bro
@@patrickevans9604 Tarantino played two characters in Django Unchained. First, Robert - or Bag Head #1 - in the scene where Spencer “Big Daddy” Bennet (Don Johnson) and all his henchmen go from discussing how to attack Dr. Schultz (Christoph Waltz) and Django (Jamie Foxx) to complaining about how badly done their bag-masks were. Later on in the story, he played Frankie, an Australian miner (with a terrible accent)
Fun fact, Leo actually cut his hand during the diner scene rant, but was so into the role that he went with it and didn't tell them to stop filming, so that cut and blood is real.
"You mean you wanna dress like that?" I mean I asked the same thing who would wanna wear that suit?? Also love how they made the Klan so funny.
I love Christoph Waltz's character in this film. It is almost like Tarantino got him back to play this character by telling him he would get the chance to (figuratively speaking) take out his character from Inglorious Basterds. The hook: both Hans Landa and Calvin Candie have these long, drawn-out monologues that are meant to sound like well-educated discussions on "the nature of things", until you back out of the tension of the scene and realize that what they are saying is absolutely monstrous, inhuman, and irredeemably evil.
As Dr. Schultz said, "I couldn't resist."
One of my favorite movies. Glad more people keep finding it. Will Smith was originally picked to play Django but turned it down. It was too aggressive for him. Waltz won an Oscar for it. I'm SHOCKED Leo or Samuel didn't win one either.
Thank god Jamie Fox got it. I legitimately think he’s a better actor and overall more talented than Will Smith.
well considering they would all be gunning for the same award (best supporting), that's highly unlikely.
Chris Tucker also turned it down after Will.
@@FrancoisDressler thank god that didn’t happen. Love Chris Rock, but I do not seeing him in a role like that.
Why are you shocked? You think they should've won it over Waltz?
Jamie Foxx is a supremely talented actor. Possibly underrated. His performance as Ray Charles in Ray is exceptional.
It is always fun to watch Leonardo DiCaprio get intense and physical in his performances. After "Titanic" came out, he was considered a teen idol and thus generated a backlash at no fault to him. He has been proving the naysayers wrong ever since, even though he had some intense roles before that.
Love how he helps Django read and understand words, shoot, and shows respect to him
Just to clarafy, the gun that shot that dude is a Sharps Carbine, in the hands of a man with talent can most certainly reach out that far.
Once cartridges were invented, even 100+ year old guns were and still are incredibly accurate and effective, the only difference is they didnt have 30 shots. Just one or two. Or in some cases a few more.
Just FYI, the rifle shot in the beginning is very possible. The gun itself wasn't invented yet, but it was a long range rifle made for those shots.
And to answer your question, yes mandingo fighting was definitely a real thing back then. Also, you did hear right about Leo being hesitant to use such harshly racist language in the film because he wasn't sure how well it would go over with audiences but Samuel L Jackson talked him into the mindset by telling him if he held back viewers would know it and he'd be hated more for that than playing into the role. "It's just another Tuesday for us mother #$%#÷=" was the words Sam claimed to have used with his pep talk
There`s no evidence for mandingo fighting anywhere.
@@jackprescott9652 If you don't accept multiple accounts of black boxers who come from a background of slavery who stated that they learned how to do it so well being pitted against other slaves...then sure, no evidence.
@@Wolfer1OOO I have never seen none of those claims anywhere. Where can i get more info about it?
While mandingo fighting may have been a thing, mandingo fighting *to the death* wasn't.
@@rogercline5377 Agree to 'wasn't a thing' ... per se, but very likely happened occasionally with high stakes ... rich white people (slave owners) gonna do rich white people shit.
Whole movie is iconic to me.. but one part in particular
“Will you tell miss Laura goodbye? Bye miss Laura **BOOM**😅🤣
Sent her to the shadow realm
I love how Dr Shultz makes Django a better person: teaches him to read, shows him manners, turns him into a sharp shooter. The pride on his face in that one scene is priceless
Django also learned to talk his way out of situations as well.
Trivia: Ending song, Theme Song from 1970 spaghetti western comedy, They Call Me Trinity(Trinity Series)… and Django’s name comes from another spaghetti western franchise self titled Django(1966)-- in fact the original Django(Franco Nero who also played General Ramon Esperanza in Die Hard 2), also makes a quick cameo appearance-- he’s the fine dressed gentleman at the bar, with the cotton white gloves(an Easter egg throwback to his character’s condition in the original film) when King Schultz and Django first meet Calvin Candie--that’s how he “knows” that the “D” in Django “is silent”. 😊 Also Leo actually did deeply cut his hand during the dinner scene and unintentionally splattered blood on Kerry Washington-- which is why her reaction looks so real-- that’s because it is legitimate shock… 😮
At 8:53, it is well within the effective distance of a Sharps Rifle. Making the shot, however, would be extremely difficult as the target was moving quickly on a horse.
The horse that Django is riding at the end of the movie actually belongs to Jamie Foxx. It's a very well-trained horse as you can see.
Leo did have an issue with the n-word, yes. But Jamie and Sam essentially set him straight. It just wouldn't make sense for an evil slave owner not to say that word.
Right.. but as a pretty good guy (as far as I've heard) in real life, surrounded by a lot of his black coworkers, I could for sure see it being difficult for him. He wasn't brought up to say that word (like any decent person)... and so.. yeah. I think it says a lot about HIM as an individual that it wasn't easy for him.. even if it's just acting.
@@CrazeeAdam absolutely.
you mean néger?
There's a show on Netflix called "Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee" and Christoph Waltz is a guest on one of the episodes. He's truly a delightful human and I want to be his friend
Fun fact - There are actually a lot of people who don’t know or don’t consider Dumas to be a black man as he was biracial. The books he wrote about The Three Musketeers and D’Artagnan were my fathers favorite and something he shared with me growing up. I would actually do my Black History Month report on Dumas and a few of my teachers back in the day tried to reject my report before I educated them.
One of my favorite movies and my favorite Tarantino film. Great movie
Best soundtrack out of all his movies, I still listen to it to this day
When Leo broke a glass, he accidentally cut his hand. In the movie it's a real wound and a real pain.
once upon a time in hollywood is a great redemption film for Leo after this role. the trailer improv in that is phenomenal.
I like the big tooth on the wagon. It has a hidden cavity to keep things safe!
Tarantino DID IT AGAIN WITH THIS FILM he took a dangerous and painfull subject and portrayed it from all sides fantastic acting all around excellent Story.
Hahahaha quit blowing the guy. Nothing dangerous about this subject unless you’re actually racist.
One of my favorite movies. It's got action, comedy and drama in spades. Also Sam Jackson and Leo play the most vile villains in cinema history.
Aww you're so sweet, when you started crying it made me want to give you a hug 🫂
This is practically my favorite movie and I'm glad you reacted to it so thank you Vicky.
This is an absolutely fantastic movie in many, many ways. The fact that it has so much humor blended in with action and some of the worst language/treatment you can imagine...it's just astounding that it was paced so well and can make you cringe one moment and giggle the next. I *love* how Dr. Schultz wouldn't say "auf wiedersehen" to Candie because it meant 'til I see you again' because he never wanted to see him again. He wanted him completely gone. But then when Django says goodbye to Schultz he whispers "auf wiedersehen" to him because Schultz helped give him back everything he wanted, but sacrificed himself in the process. It's such an honorable tribute and I love the dynamic between the 2 of them. This is such a damn good movie. Tarantino has some really good movies. I love 'Kill Bill Vol 1 + 2', but overall I think Django may be his best overall movie. Yes, I went there.
20:05 It's called "Candie Land" because Leo's character's last name is Candie.
I believe Shultz had a Sharps Rifle, so that long range shot he takes of one of the Brittle brothers at that first plantation would have been absolutely possible, and quite easy for a good shot at that range. The practical effective range of that rifle was around 1,000 yards (maximum effective range up to 3,000 yards). The shot he takes is no more than 200-300 yards.
At the 20:00 mark, they due harvest sugarcane, but Leo’s character’s name is Calvin Candie, hence the name.
"They could never make Blazing Saddles today!"
They made *this* movie - which was ALSO about:
A black hero starting from the bottom of society, stumbling into a position of authority by a stroke of dumb luck, who teams up with a more experienced white gunslinger and brings justice to the unjust.
There's a even a scene where they lure the racist bad guys into a trap with a childish trick and blow them up by detonating a cache of explosives with a long-distance sniper shot.
N-word count: BS-38, Django - *One hundred eleven*
I had the same Quidditch game as a kid on the GameCube and that music as the raid starts took me back as well
Quentin tarantino went boom, love how he gets into his own movies,love all of his movies has some interesting characters, and Christopher waltz is so good in anything he's in, plays a great but different character in inglourious basterds. Or as a farther figure in Alita Battle Angle
Your right. Leo had a hard time saying it. It was Samuel who got him to say it. There's a video on here with Jamie fox explained what happened
Just got to the part where she talks about Christoph Waltz playing similar characters.
Gosh can't wait to see her watch Inglorious Bastards
Leo smoked his roll 🔥
This film deserves a lot of oscars, not just 2. Just the acting (including the horse) minimum 4 oscars.
Fun fact: during the scene where Candie threatens Dr Schulz and Django, when Leo slams his hand on the table he breaks a wine glass and cuts himself on it and smears his blood over Hildy’s face. The blood smeared on Hildy’s face is fake, but the breaking of the wine glass was unscripted, and the blood we see on Leo’s hand is real. He actually cut himself by breaking that glass accidentally and continued the scene, severely bleeding hand and all.
8:54 that is a Winchester rifle made for distance shoote
First reaction I've watched of yours, and totally agree with your love for Waltz. His characters are always the best. His ability to be likeable whether good or bad is amazing.
That being said, good god could you be anymore virtue signalling?! We get it, slavery was terrible but bloody hell you don't have to keep making sure we know you think it is. TH-camr and youngsters in general these days are so fascinated in trying to make sure they say and do everything that makes them seem a 'great person'.
20:55 Apparently when Tarantino brought Jackson the script, Jackson said something like "you bring me this script when it's ten years too late for me to play the lead role, and you ask me to play the most despicable negro character in movie history?", Tarantino said 'yeah' and Jackson said 'alright then lets do it'. Can definitely see how he was going for 'despicable' with his portrayal.
This and Wolf of Wall Street are two movies where Leo 100% understood the assignment and his characters are so morally reprehensible. But I could never imagine anybody but Leo playing them.
My view on the n word. if you don't like the word don't use it...I'm referring to those of African decent still using the word, daily...
Yep, and it's often used disparagingly by them against others. Someone should be more outraged by usage now, when those people are calling each other the same thing. If she isn't complaining about that, then she's a hypocrite.
My question is why do you want to say it so bad? Real strange
My favorite scene is when Dr. Schultz and Django are in the bar, and Dr. Is serving Django a beer.
Dr. Schultz walked into a tavern, kicked the owner out, killed the sheriff, and got paid two hundred dollars for it all by the US Marshall. Fucking boss.
While some historians claimed that there was no recorded history of any Mandingo fights. Slaves were purely economic and to buy a slave for the use of battle would be detrimental to the slave owners. David Blight, the director of Yale’s Center for the Study of Slavery, mentioned in an interview about the historical accuracy of Mandingo Fighting, “The reason slave owners wouldn’t have pitted their slaves against each other in such a way is strictly economic. Slavery was built upon money, and the fortune to be made for owners was in buying, selling, and working them, not in sending them out to fight at the risk of death.”
Blight argued that Tarantino was most likely inspired by the 1970’s book/movie Mandingo where a slave is purchased solely to get into fights with other slaves.
However, Slave Fights did occur. Many slaves were pitted in “Bare Knuckle Brawls” and other savage battles with other slaves. In fact, many freed slaves after the Civil War began to train boxers in the style of Bare Knuckle Brawling.
I love this movie so much because while most movies make me want to root for the "good guy", this one makes me want to actively root against the bad guys. I didn't just want Django to be victorious, I totally wanted him to kill them all at the end and most movies can't make me feel that way.
hey @ 9:00 you said with that gun at that distance he can’t hit that shot, well i’m here to tell you this rifles could accurately hit a target up
to 450yards away. QT said in an interview the editing took a couple of scenes out, DR. Schultz is suppose to talk about distance and he sets his rifle for 250yds then blows him down after the sequence we saw. the original cut was 4 hours long, even after editing it was still too long they had to cut more and more out. still waiting on that Directors cut. one of my all time favorite movies i’ve seen it atleast 20 times
The Italian man at the club who's mandingo lost the fight and who asks Django what his name was also played a character called Django in a Western movie in either the 60s or the 70s (they use half of the soundtrack from that movie for this movie). That's why when our Django said 'the d is silent' the original Django said 'I know'.
8:55 I'd wager that particular rifle could hit someone at that distance, because it's a Sharps rifle. Sharps rifles are renowned for their incredible long-range accuracy even in those times. The only inaccuracy in that scene is that rifle wouldn't have been introduced until about twenty years later, if I remember right.
The rifle that Dr. Shultz uses in this movie is a Sharps Model 1874 Buffalo, while it technically did not exist in 1858, the rifle would most definitely be able to make those long range shots... with ease. Whether it be a rifle in 1858 or 1874... the effective range is about 1000 yards or 910 meters and it's probably firing 45-70.
Love your reactions but I just wanted to point that out.
8:48 the Sharps 1874 Buffalo rifle could easily make the shot with a competent marksman behind it. Unfortunately, that rifle is an anachronism in this film since it is set two decades before that rifle was produced.
No, it's not a "Southern Thing." Historically, families showed affection differently than now, hand-holding, snuggles, and even quick smooches on the lips not unusual, particularly between siblings and cousins, which is part of why Nick and Daisy seem particularly close in the Great Gatsby, especially in the Baz Luhrmann version.
Tarantino once said that Calvin Candie is the only character of his that he's ever absolutely hated.
Interestingly enough, I believe that those long shots with an open-sight rifle are possible, I would recommend that you check out the Mathew Quigley Buffalo rifle match, where contestants regularly make shots much farther than that, with rifles of the same era.
10:00 I can't even begin to tell you how much I relate to that
You should see Christoph Waltz play the villain in Green Hornet! He's ridiculous!
I love Christoph Waltz too. He plays a good scary bad guy in "water for elephants" with Reese Witherspoon & Robert Pattison.
Still one of the best scenes where Leo cuts himself, bleeds heavily and just goes on and on... brilliant!
17:37 I had heard Leo had some hesitation with his lines and Samuel L Jackson told him “this is just another day for us” (I’m paraphrasing but you understand)
You notice Leonardo’s hand in the hammer scene he actually cut it and kept going didn’t break scene
Candy is so fucking mentally strong. The way her eyes shine bright with the smile in the end regardless of what she went through.
21:40 As a lifelong southerner, can confirm that NO, it is NOT normal to kiss your siblings on the mouth.
Let's just say bounty hunting back then was a lucrative occupation. and stealing cattle was a VERY big nono back then... especially here in texas.
So many moments in this film but for me, top is always 31:30 Django bursting in calling 'D'Artagnan's' name to avenge his death.
Great reaction vid!
Christoph was a guest on Jerry Seinfeld's Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee on Netflix.
"LISTEN COLENAL SANDERS"
🤣🤣🤣🤣
8:49 The Sharps rifle is actually pretty accurate, totally possible.
The shot on Ellis Brittle would definitely be possible for an experienced marksman. Extremely difficult, but possible nonetheless. That rifle is accurate up to 1,000 yards in the right hands, and capable of operating somewhat accurately at even greater distances.
Around 17:30 DeCaprio had trouble with the lines, but he rehearsed them with Samuel L. Jackson who helped him. DeCaprio is a good actor, and part of getting into character is that mindset.
8:55 not possible with that gun? That's a Sharps rifle, which has confirmed kill shots during the civil war at a 1000 yards, and unconfirmed shots at 3 times that distance. A couple hundred yards with a Sharps really wouldn't be a challenge for an experienced marksman. Not saying it's an easy shot by any means, but definitely doable.
hell fking yeah you remember that music from quidditch game! me too my favorite game growing up!!! ps watched so many ur videos and liked them. keep them up.