Pagani Huayra R Acceleration 0-300 km/h in 16 Seconds GPS speed

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 6

  • @skillandluck
    @skillandluck 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    AMG/HWA POWER!!!

  • @KiLLzDaQ
    @KiLLzDaQ 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fav car❤

  • @John_again_John
    @John_again_John 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Insane acceleration. I wonder what it could do with perfect conditions

    • @John_again_John
      @John_again_John 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Considering the power to weight ratio, it could be a possible competitor for other track monsters such as the McLaren P1 and FXXK Evo
      Using context from other videos, it has breaking similar to the average LMP car, going from over 300 kmh to just over a third of it in an unbelievably short amount of time, which is absolutely mind boggling
      In a perfect conditions run, it will be settings absolutely *insane* times
      Can’t wait to see its track times

  • @Smzxe
    @Smzxe 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thats really a GPS or not?

  • @projectr2451
    @projectr2451 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    LMAO if you guys really believe this video as hardcore evidence then you are all delusional. I’ll list out every single issue with this:
    1). There’s no 0-100km/h shown in the video. A random number has been put there, or a claim rather.
    2. Because of the fact that you can’t have a 0-200km/h or 0-300km/h time as there is nothing to suggest the acceleration from 0, or its launch. The video starts from 100km/h.
    3. If you play the video at 0.25 speed, you realise that the video is not edited the best, as the car jumps from 122km/h to 126km/h, which can make the difference. This is why mixing videos is not an accurate representation.
    4. In the first video, the car is quite obviously on a decline. That means it is going downhill, which makes a car quicker. In the second video, on the main straight, the track goes downhill towards the end. This means most of this acceleration video is downhill, which means on a normal flat surface, it will not be as quick. You’d have to either do it on a flat surface or run it backwards uphill to account for that variable and get an average.