Wave Functions in Quantum Mechanics: The SIMPLE Explanation | Quantum Mechanics... But Quickly

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Ever heard of the term "wave function" in relation to quantum mechanics? What does it mean? How is it interpreted?
    Hey everyone, I'm back with a new video! This time, we're going back to basics and understanding exactly what a wave function is, as well as what it represents, in the world of quantum physics. This video is going to be the first in a series I'm going to call "Quantum Mechanics... But Quickly". In this series, I want to discuss some fundamental quantum concepts, and explain them in as visual and intuitive a way as possible - without having to sit through an hour long lecture, or understanding complicated graduate level mathematics.
    A physicist named Louis de Broglie once suggested something amazing. While scientists were busy debating whether light was a wave or a particle, de Broglie suggested that even matter - things with mass (e.g. electrons, protons, atoms, etc.) - could behave like waves. This idea was revolutionary due to the mountains of evidence scientists had up until that point that matter behaved like particles. However, the quantum world was soon to revolutionise everything we thought we knew about the universe. And as it turns out, de Broglie's suggestion was right.
    His suggestion of matter waves permeated into the work of Erwin Schrodinger. Combining the idea of matter waves with the principle of Conservation of Energy, Schrodinger came up with the equation we now know as the Schrodinger Equation. This ended up being the governing equation of quantum mechanics, and crucially contained a function known as the wave function. This wave function contained mathematical information about any quantum system we happened to be studying.
    The key question, then, was about what the wave function actually related to. What did it correspond to in real life? How should we interpret it? Well, there are a few different interpretations of quantum mechanics and how it relates to our real-life universe. The most commonly accepted one is the Copenhagen interpretation. And this interpretation suggests that a wave function is directly related to the probability distribution of a system. Specifically, if we take a system's wave function and square it (well, technically if we take its square modulus), then this will give us the probabilities of various results occurring when we make a measurement on a system. For example, the wave function of a system could tell us the probability of finding a particle at a certain position in space. Or it could tell us the probabilities of finding different spin states when measuring the spin of an electron, for example.
    In this video, we discuss these examples in detail. Additionally, we briefly look at the consequences of wave functions having imaginary parts. Lastly, we look at how the Schrodinger Equation (or at least the time dependent Schrodinger Equation) governs how a wave function changes over time - apart from when we make a measurement on the system. This measurement causes a discontinuous and jarring change in the wave function, known as the "collapse of the wave function". This collapse has caused many philosophical problems for physicists over the years, and it continues to do so to this day.
    Thanks so much for watching this video! If you'd like to support me, please subscribe to my channel and hit the bell button to be notified when I upload.
    Patreon: patreon.com/parthg
    Instagram: parthvlogs
    Second TH-cam Channel: Parth G's Shenanigans

ความคิดเห็น • 265

  • @keppa3635
    @keppa3635 3 ปีที่แล้ว +241

    Now I am in a state of both "confused" and "excited".

    • @eyewaves...
      @eyewaves... 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Collapse your state of mind to determine the actual state ;-)

    • @dionisiaevadionisia405
      @dionisiaevadionisia405 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      KNP Benny MUKUL
      KARENA 59A

    • @dionisiaevadionisia405
      @dionisiaevadionisia405 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Benny MARAH BANGET
      KNP
      TIDAK PUASA
      TIDAK KENAL
      Bisa Dengar telepom

    • @dionisiaevadionisia405
      @dionisiaevadionisia405 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      PAPA AS MR
      HARUS HIDUP TERUS

    • @swish6143
      @swish6143 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you can make jokes about it, that means you actually understood it. I think about it the same way sometimes.

  • @soumyajitroy4385
    @soumyajitroy4385 3 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    Being a physics undergrad, getting to revise the concepts in such interesting way WITHOUT TEDIOUS DERIVATIONS is a blessing ❤️ thank you so much. Your explanations are amazing!!

  • @BenjaminTMilnes
    @BenjaminTMilnes 3 ปีที่แล้ว +118

    Schrödinger: 'I've come up with an equation that's good at describing hydrogen atoms.'
    Dirac: 'I'm gonna end this guy's career.'

    • @ParthGChannel
      @ParthGChannel  3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      Some professor in the back: What career? WHAT CAREER?

    • @sunithasomalingam2668
      @sunithasomalingam2668 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@ParthGChannel Bro..
      Here "Dirac" A English Theoretical physicist "Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac "
      After listening to Schrödinger Eqn. He decided to quit his Career of Being Physicist. 😂😂😂
      It's A Joke

    • @viradeus4322
      @viradeus4322 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@sunithasomalingam2668 he probably knows dude

    • @sunithasomalingam2668
      @sunithasomalingam2668 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@viradeus4322 Indeed He knew..
      I jus Laughed at mine Condition after reading Schrödinger😂😂

  • @joshuamunson2876
    @joshuamunson2876 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Something that blew my mind about the collapse of the wave function through positional measurement is that a free particle can be theoretically anywhere in the universe until you measure it.

    • @TheDavidlloydjones
      @TheDavidlloydjones 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ...but like any other excuse you try out on your Mummy, some possibilities are more likely than others.
      Heisenberg uncertainty doesn't cut in until after a whole lot of decimal places...

  • @shanmugamshans4252
    @shanmugamshans4252 3 ปีที่แล้ว +84

    Hi parth you can introduce some math also in this series which we would love to see.🙏

  • @linezero9016
    @linezero9016 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I make a living on explaining what the wave function is. I am happy to see that there is finally a reference video giving a quick dirty introduction. Love your video, keep it up!

    • @Lucky9_9
      @Lucky9_9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How do you bake a living explaining what the wave function is lol I want fun job like that

    • @drawforge3920
      @drawforge3920 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Lucky9_9 he/she's obviously a physics/chemistry professors

  • @towhid6476
    @towhid6476 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It really helps a lot. Such a fun and formal way to enjoy learning such complex topics. Loving your work, Parth.

  • @jinggin2177
    @jinggin2177 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are the best TH-camr who totally grabbed my attention! I love the way how you put the quantum physics in, it is so fun!!!

  • @iziz772
    @iziz772 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've spent much time reading and watching, trying to understand a bit about this equation. By just focusing on a picture of the wave, you have clarified what I was looking for. I won't forget this, but I will forget all the math derivations that I sweated through!

  • @surprisemokwena6590
    @surprisemokwena6590 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Me too. Guy sparked a glimpse onto something materially realistic yet mind bending

  • @bengriffiths9631
    @bengriffiths9631 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    One thing that blows my mind is that if you measure the particles position within that box in example 1, it will instantaneously collapse into a delta function (100% in one location) at that position which is obviously not one of the energy eigenstates (sine waves) shown. The bit that blows my mind is that in order to replicate this delta function in position, the particle instantly goes into a superposition of infinitely many energy and momenta eigenstates. This example is a great way to introduce commutation relations if you want to delve into the linear algebra in later videos

  • @djayers
    @djayers 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice and clear, thanks. I want to get a handle on this stuff, but it's far from anything I need to do, so I can't really justify sitting through 1hr videos. Looking forward to more!

  • @user-wr4yl7tx3w
    @user-wr4yl7tx3w ปีที่แล้ว

    Just the video I was looking for.

  • @aghost3016
    @aghost3016 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU I'm so happy I can actually follow information about this 😮

  • @fundamentalsofphysicsfop3531
    @fundamentalsofphysicsfop3531 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your explanation are very reliable and easy to understand ...

  • @thejuniorastrophysicist
    @thejuniorastrophysicist 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Parth! Thank you for this video...I've finally got the point of wave function

  • @samherz4092
    @samherz4092 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just an amazing video! Helped a lot ty!

  • @sunithasomalingam2668
    @sunithasomalingam2668 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I always wait for Parth Bro's Video❤️❤️
    Now Wave Function 😁
    Love dis Channel 😍

    • @ParthGChannel
      @ParthGChannel  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks so much for your support as always!

  • @ffhashimi
    @ffhashimi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great Explanation!; I hope you extend this to a very simple system and explain how exactly physicists do there calculations, let's say a hydrogen atom what physicist do from preparing there experiment to doing there calculations until doing the experiment and finding the result; I know I may asking too much; but you are very good in explaining this topic and such a simple system example would put every thing said before into a very clear prescriptive; thank you for your excellent job!.

  • @sakshidwivedy1677
    @sakshidwivedy1677 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What an explanation!!!!!....great job

  • @nabhoneelchatterjee2692
    @nabhoneelchatterjee2692 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    clear cut explanation as always💙

  • @justinotherpatriot1744
    @justinotherpatriot1744 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    These are great man. God bless you

  • @shahkhan4419
    @shahkhan4419 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for explaining this really helpful

  • @eyewaves...
    @eyewaves... 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    pretty good short and relatively precise explanation with limited uncertainty !

  • @jeanchauvus3337
    @jeanchauvus3337 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good!! Clear explanation easy to follow even in different langage for me at 75% speed.. Merci beaucoup

  • @Higgsinophysics
    @Higgsinophysics 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Happy to see you are back! Another killer video

  • @ruchirsugandhi2254
    @ruchirsugandhi2254 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for making it easy.👍

  • @Mtheory11
    @Mtheory11 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Taking quantum right now. This video is very helpful 👍thanks for explaining so well

  • @yoloswag6242
    @yoloswag6242 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks man. Great companion video for David Griffith's textbook.

  • @sharma_anuj00
    @sharma_anuj00 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great one🔥🔥❤️

  • @sanatanseconnection7014
    @sanatanseconnection7014 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I am science graduate, seeking how to interpret the universe by physics and mathematics. You have done wonderful job, complex theory in so simple manner. I never want to miss you

    • @myothersoul1953
      @myothersoul1953 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Interpret (verb) to give or provide the meaning of; explain; explicate; elucidate.
      I think physics can only describe the universe, to find it's meaning requires something else.

  • @nerffan1
    @nerffan1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    You've managed to explain briefly what my QM professor couldn't do in my QM courses. QM undergrad really flew past me - I somewhat understood the math (as always, math is just following rules), but had no idea how to interpret it. Right now I'm applying to grad school hoping they don't penalize me too much for getting a C in QMII

  • @rh7686
    @rh7686 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow. Great exposition.

  • @raghakeerthana9358
    @raghakeerthana9358 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow thank you so much❤ my sir took lecture for about 2hrs nd I can't even understand what he is trying to say but this 10mins video explained me the concept in short nd crisp way thanks a lot once again

  • @ayeshajaved9987
    @ayeshajaved9987 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much sir for this video nd I will waiting for ur more amazing lectures quickly.....

  • @abhishekaabhi4992
    @abhishekaabhi4992 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great idea video all about wave nature of electrons special feature as wave not just particle behaviour

  • @kabandajamilu9036
    @kabandajamilu9036 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The best teacher thanks good explanation sir

  • @georgecorrea4262
    @georgecorrea4262 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    George:
    Great Explanation .

  • @anonymes2884
    @anonymes2884 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    That's easily a contender for the best 10 minute explanation of the wave function i've seen to date. Concise and coherent (heh :).
    Looking forward to further videos, especially about foundations of quantum mechanics (full disclosure: partly because my impression is you're not a fan of Copenhagen and i'm always interested in cogent arguments for other interpretations).

  • @mrscookiecutter1606
    @mrscookiecutter1606 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks to you quarantine isn't as bad as it's supposed to be

  • @Bushmani
    @Bushmani 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is excellent

  • @cementos7922
    @cementos7922 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much for the video. I'm not a mathematician, but i want to understand this topic

  • @rajaradi802
    @rajaradi802 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice one! !

  • @jean-micheltorres6925
    @jean-micheltorres6925 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome , thank you !

  • @60pluscrazy
    @60pluscrazy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation 👌

  • @pawanbhatt314
    @pawanbhatt314 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    please make video on Electrostatic potential and energy, I'm hell confused with these terms.
    It'll be a great great help.
    Thank you!

  • @ayeshamajeed6682
    @ayeshamajeed6682 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I always wait for you owsome video..

  • @saintboimike
    @saintboimike 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This man is a genius, thank you sir

  • @vindalsacademy
    @vindalsacademy ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you young man

  • @zzpipozz6365
    @zzpipozz6365 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    such a good video

  • @Archita_Rajpoot
    @Archita_Rajpoot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A perfect Vedio 👍

  • @kushal2761
    @kushal2761 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks a lot 👍

  • @frankieclayton9303
    @frankieclayton9303 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is important to me.

  • @JagdishCVyas
    @JagdishCVyas 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beautiful, short is sweet. Colapse of a wave function at a boundary a recreation of new wave fuction is inherent idea of Indian philosophy of death and rebirth of individuals, as written in bhagawadgeeta, which is a small part of great epic the Mahabharat.

  • @neelabhachatterjee4715
    @neelabhachatterjee4715 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    |psi> generally represents a state vector. The wavefunction psi(x) is written as psi(x)=. Many people can think psi(x) and |psi>> are the same by watching this video, while in reality they are not.

  • @ayhamhalalsheh221
    @ayhamhalalsheh221 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    pleas make a full course about quantum physics

  • @KipIngram
    @KipIngram 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ok, that was good. You didn't get to the parts I'm most interested in, but I enjoyed it nonetheless, and your narration voice is pleasant too.

  • @preetkaur2912
    @preetkaur2912 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please make a video on quantum Zeno effect

  • @5ty717
    @5ty717 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please address in a future piece:
    Are all fermions/ bosons, particles, photons, neutrinos etc etc evolving “naturally” in their continuous but individual superpositions til measurement decoherence or entanglement after which they will again blossom with evolving superposition unless zenoed or again interfered with…
    And
    Is the waveform universal to each type (and/or all) types of particles?
    Very precise yet accurate work my friend… thx for your insight.

  • @musicoscope
    @musicoscope 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    excellent

  • @curvebal
    @curvebal 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Enjoyable video, at some point in your quantum mechanics videos please discuss the other interpretations that attempt to explain super position and entanglement. Thanks

    • @ParthGChannel
      @ParthGChannel  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh definitely, that one's high up on the list!

  • @grandgamersunion1030
    @grandgamersunion1030 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Woowwww I really love this channel. I have some questions ❓❓"if quantum mechanics is soo powerful why doesn't it implies on the macro world?". One more "1:09 do macro objects also have probabilistic waves and please give some examples" .This channel is really helping me! Thanks

    • @dhritimanroyghatak2408
      @dhritimanroyghatak2408 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Let me try to explain that altho it won't be as good as Parth. So quantum mechanics is not the Physics of subatomic world or something it (along with relativity) are our current best model of Physics available. That means that the places where classical mechanics fails to explain things QM successfully can (Infact this is how and why this branch emerged to explain the drawbacks of classical mechanics as it was reaching its limits of applicability) but in addition to that QM is an improvement over CM as it began to explain a more general case scenario of which CM became a special case scenario (scenarios where objects and masses are large enough that the "Quantum Weirdness" is not significant). For example an apple also has a wavelength associated to it given by De-Broglie's equations and also Obeys Schrodinger's Equations but since it is so massive and has such a big size (compared to atoms and all) That the result you end up getting is what u would get from Newtons laws of motion. Infact if u plugin those simplified conditions into the Schrodinger's Equations they BECOME Newton's second law of motion. So in a nutshell Quantum Physics is the general case scenario of which classical Physics is a special case.

    • @SilviaSolden
      @SilviaSolden 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Rather in a macro world you are dealing with properbilities highly centered around what you can see with your "eyes". Ie. you could throw a ball at a wall and in a million times the age of the universe, expect that ball at some point would appear on the other side of that wall.. @@dhritimanroyghatak2408

  • @starfragment7535
    @starfragment7535 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please make a video on tachyons a hypothetical particle which travel faster than light

  • @mohammadrashedkhan486
    @mohammadrashedkhan486 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    ধন্যবাদ ভাই।

  • @Arya-cs7kj
    @Arya-cs7kj ปีที่แล้ว

    "WTF is a wavefunction?" Is my exact sentiment while studying this topic. The thumbnail is appropriate. 😂😂

  • @ratnabesra8959
    @ratnabesra8959 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please make more videos like this

  • @geetchandra36ningthoujam54
    @geetchandra36ningthoujam54 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir please make abouth
    1. Conservation of probabilty
    2. Probability current density

  • @abdullahalnadrun3727
    @abdullahalnadrun3727 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir please make a playlist of all series of Quantum mechanics we are not able to find in an order. so please.make a playlist where all basics and in a seriall way we will get to know nicely about quantum mechanics

  • @notlessgrossman163
    @notlessgrossman163 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How is that different than tossing dice and 'measurement' is you sticking out your hand to catch dice on your palm to read the result? Do we say dice is a superposition of 1 to 6?

  • @KrappyPatty-ry6lj
    @KrappyPatty-ry6lj 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How is the wave function of an electron in a molecule related to its energy? This one thing is messing up all of my understanding of Molecular orbital theory pls help

  • @TheAyoubi
    @TheAyoubi 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dear G, can you please answer my question wether psi wave function can interfere constructively and destructively similar to a classical wave "A real electromagnetic wave" ? Thanks

  • @shivangprasad
    @shivangprasad 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    hey , i wanted to know if a you trim a frequencies cycle per second in terms of time ,so is it no longer the same frequency now? sorry so not relavent the topic lol

  • @vindalsacademy
    @vindalsacademy ปีที่แล้ว

    You are doing well.

  • @JamesCampbellPPG
    @JamesCampbellPPG 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. Very clear explanation. Still absorbing, but that's on me, not you! lol. Also, please consider a piece of black tape over the red light reflected by your eyeglasses. I got distracted like a cat watching a laser light. lol.

  • @goldibollocks
    @goldibollocks 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Okay, but what if the electron is not in a box bouncing from wall to wall but rather shot out in a straight line into some direction? Does it still travel like a wave and will only have a high probability of being measurable at certain points along the travel path? Or will it travel at a constant speed and we can accurately predict where exactly it will be after any given amount of time (and also always measure it there)?
    Also, how does the wave function look when we want to describe an electron that is part of an atom? What exactly is 'x' there?

  • @tolibelom
    @tolibelom 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice work man, between 15-20 mins would be great, but probably not much less than 10 mins.

  • @kavyathaniyarasu6880
    @kavyathaniyarasu6880 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    few videos about statistical mechanics please

  • @abhasoodan7982
    @abhasoodan7982 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanq for this video, can you make a detailed video about schrodingers equation with its solution and everything please ?

    • @ParthGChannel
      @ParthGChannel  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      For sure! I've already made a video a while ago describing the Schrodinger equation (you can find it here: th-cam.com/video/BFTxP03H13k/w-d-xo.html) but I haven't discussed solutions in great detail :)

    • @abhasoodan7982
      @abhasoodan7982 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Parth G yes I’ve seen that one, was wondering if you would make one with detailed maths, which you tend to leave out for our understanding 😅

  • @Ubaidullah_Khalid
    @Ubaidullah_Khalid 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is interpreted very well.

  • @polkamolka4396
    @polkamolka4396 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please can you explain laplace transform. Thanks

  • @Rexyyy99
    @Rexyyy99 ปีที่แล้ว

    If I may ask why does Psi squared give probability distributions and not Psi cubed or Psi to the power 4,5,6, etc. what's special about the square?

  • @ItsMe-dj6pl
    @ItsMe-dj6pl 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazzzzzing

  • @wayneyadams
    @wayneyadams ปีที่แล้ว

    5:19 This idea of a particle being in a blend of states is what led to the famous Schrodinger's cat in a box narrative. This was meant to be a derogatory example by showing how ridiculous it was to have a cat that is both alive and dead at the same time. Lo and behold, somehow it caught on and now Physicists use Schrodinger's cat to illustrate the Copenhagen interpretation. But it was not intended to be used that way.
    Another famous example is the term "Big Bang" which was also a derogatory term used by Physicists who held to the steady state model of the universe. The problem here, that nothing actually bangs in the traditional sense of an explosion.
    Pauli is driving along a highway with Schrodinger in the passenger seat of the car. A policeman pulls them over for speeding. He asks Pauli if he knows how fast he was driving to which Pauli answers, no he doesn't, and neither can the policeman. This annoys the officer, so he decides to search the car. He opens a box in the trunk and calls out to the two men asking why they are carrying a dead cat in the trunk of the car. Schrodinger replies, "You killed my cat!"

  • @neutronenstern.
    @neutronenstern. 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If we have a wave function of light, then we know, that the wave it represents is a wave correlating to a electromagnetic field that oszillates. But do we know, what field or what... does oszillate, if there is a matter wave? Is it EM-field in case of eg. electrons, strong interaction field in case of Hadons, and weak interaction field in case of paticles with weak charge ? Or is it something else?

  • @s......ali8572
    @s......ali8572 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir lectures about schordinger wave equation must be in series like lec 1 lec 2 to avoid from complexity for begners

  • @joelkositsky4263
    @joelkositsky4263 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice. But you should make sine squared probability function have the sin-squared (and not the sine) shape.

  • @themartian9634
    @themartian9634 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey Parth! I love your Videos and how the way u Teach and Explain !
    But, Parth please make a video on Vedic Physics ! All humans are forgetting that advance Physics !
    Their knowledge was not less than Modern Physics !
    Then How that's built and Engineered that Ancient Temple in Cambodia with an accuracy and precesion of Modern GPS Level ?
    Please Cover That ! And for more info follow Praveen Mohan who also given Many Lectures on
    Ancient Alien Series on
    History TV 18 !
    🙏🏻

  • @takyc7883
    @takyc7883 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2:33 can anyone explain why squaring the wave function and modding gives us a the probability distribution? I understand that the wave function is complex and you multiply it by its conjugate but why? What is the logical reason that a probability distribution is found this way?

  • @ghazimalik
    @ghazimalik ปีที่แล้ว

    You are an eloquent and brilliant Physics teacher and you don’t need to use fowl language.

  • @KipIngram
    @KipIngram 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    2:45 - That didn't seem wishy washy to me at all; you described exactly how to get the wave function and how to go to a probability distribution.

  • @racpa5
    @racpa5 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why 1/2 for spin up and square root of 3 over 2 for spin down?

  • @sonugeorgealex
    @sonugeorgealex 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which text do you use?

  • @mehanaziqbal5434
    @mehanaziqbal5434 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m so happy to have found your channel..
    I’m rooting for ya😊✌️

  • @Beli1921
    @Beli1921 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    MAY GOD BLESS YOU

  • @HilarionWon
    @HilarionWon 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you, thank you, thank you....you've answered a question I have been wondering about for a long time...namely what happens to the election/elementary particle once you have measured it?....the answer is that it doesn't remain in a collapsed state for all of eternity, it eventually evolves back into a wave like state.

  • @beyondmathandphysics3720
    @beyondmathandphysics3720 ปีที่แล้ว

    What excactly we mean by making a measurment? When we have a measurment?

  • @hamdaniyusuf_dani
    @hamdaniyusuf_dani 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    when you square the half sinewave function in 3:24 the result should have 0 gradient at both ends.

  • @feeltheforce10
    @feeltheforce10 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How does any of this help human beings ? Can we harness it for good purposes ? Do our thoughts influence any of this ? I have noticed for some time now certain things happen - for example.
    During lockdown i take a daily walk through a quiet village - maybe 1 or 2 cars pass by on the road but as soon i decide to cross the road suddenly lots of cars go by so i have to stand and wait.Would they have come yb if i had not decided to cross the road ? As soon as i cross the road no more cars pass by - its seems very odd.
    I get to my car - all is quiet - as soon as i decide to drive off other cars suddenly appear when before it was calm and no cars around.Does intent or motion cause others to do the same ?

  • @blank8515
    @blank8515 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can anyone explain what that negative sign in k.E says?

  • @danieltrieu7816
    @danieltrieu7816 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Holy fuck this was a clear conceptual explanation