Smith & Wesson 642: Before you buy this 5 shot .38 special +p you need to watch this unboxing!!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
  • A roundhouse revolver to be reckoned with? Revolver fan or not you may want to pick one of these up (if you can get your hands on it). I mean after all, who doesn't love something that goes bang when you pull the trigger!
    Thanks for watching, please SLAP that like button if you enjoyed

ความคิดเห็น • 150

  • @genepitney155
    @genepitney155 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    It is apparent you don't like this firearm. As a retired LEO I never leave home without mine.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There’s absolutely nothing functionally wrong with it. It’s just not my cup of tea but I could say the same about most revolvers as I’ve just never trained much with them so I don’t carry them. Thanks for watching and commenting and please be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already

  • @timsharkey1993
    @timsharkey1993 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    If you look at S&W’s catalog you’ll see many different versions, all based on the 5-shot j-frame platform. So that means they’re selling a bunch of them, which also means lots of people are buying and probably carrying them. Me, I carry a 642 most of the time. Never mind the +P, though. I prefer the standard velocity 110-grain Critical Defense round by Hornady.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      No doubt that many people carry them it’s a very carryable pistol.

    • @BigWorm3030
      @BigWorm3030 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'm a bigger guy and before I got my groove life belt I wasn't able to comfortably carry anything bigger I've loved my 642 since the day I got it

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      How do you like the belt? Thanks for watching and commenting and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already. Thanks again

    • @BigWorm3030
      @BigWorm3030 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@GSquaredTactical I absolutely love it like I said I'm a bigger guy and I can actually carry in the front side and back comfortably with no bulge because of it its sturdy friction free and my fat ass can put it on and take it off with ease definitely worth the money and they have a life time warranty

    • @BigWorm3030
      @BigWorm3030 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@GSquaredTactical I'm 5"11 and 400 pounds I carry a full sized hk 45 comfortably and keep my 642 in my boot

  • @jamiemartin1793
    @jamiemartin1793 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I love my Glocks but the S&W 642 always ends up in my pocket

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah I’m the same way about a lot of guns. Thanks for watching and commenting and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already. Thanks again

  • @microshaft3109
    @microshaft3109 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    This is a mafia gun. Love it so much by keeping all my shells with me and reduce evidence left behind.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Haha thanks for watching and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already

  • @knuckles-3386
    @knuckles-3386 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is a get off me gun I don’t care about recoil or accuracy beyond 10 yards or so and yes it’s nice not to leave brass all over the place

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I understand that. Thanks for watching and commenting and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already

  • @randyreynolds1045
    @randyreynolds1045 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Nice gun , but the all steel 640 .357 is still better. Not too heavy either. The Pro Series is best❤.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for watching and commenting and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already

  • @stevemellgard6393
    @stevemellgard6393 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This little revolver is a great everyday carry. In most critical defense situations this will get it done.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Absolutely it will. Thanks for watching and commenting and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already

  • @GrowlinWillie
    @GrowlinWillie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I bought one thos morning, it sure fits nice in my pocket. $459

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes it does!! Thanks for watching and commenting and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already. Thanks again

  • @oldcop18
    @oldcop18 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    My issued revolver saved me more than once during the first 20 yrs of my career & I still carry a J Frame in retirement. I’ve pocket carried a revolver w/a hammer and you just put a thumb over the hammer when drawing from the pocket. My current EDC is either a 340PD or 442 Pro.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hard to beat sir. Thanks for your service and hey, thanks for watching and commenting and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already. Thanks again

    • @Just1American1966
      @Just1American1966 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Twice, I was glad to be able to hand off my duty revolver to another officer and draw my snub .38 on incidents. In one case, the other officer had rushed to back me up after handling an arrestee and had left his sidearm secured at the lockup.
      In the second case, I was conducting a felony stop across from a house at which an off-duty officer from my department happened to be visiting (he was taking his girlfriend's trash out.) He hung out with me until other units arrived.

  • @Nesmaniac
    @Nesmaniac 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I have one that I believe they made a mistake and did not have the airweight writing on the side or the larger S&W logo. It's a 642-1 and I looked up others online and all had it so I'm thinking it slipped out of the factory that way. I had to have it when I saw it because not only of that but the fact it does not have the Hillary hole. Gun shop guy was really shocked to see what I was talking about and even checked his other inventory to see if any others were the same and nope. I posted a video of it. Great little guns and about as perfect as one can get for a pocket pistol imo.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is definitely a good pocket pistol no doubt. That’s crazy about the branding. Thanks for watching and commenting and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already. Thanks again

  • @Motorcyclewindtherapy
    @Motorcyclewindtherapy ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I've read more than once that the 442/642 is the #1 seller SW has every year, including last year. My no lock 442 has been a great back up gun, coat pocket gun, and snake shot gun for about 10 years now.
    I'm old enough that a snub and other revolvers were all were shot as far as hand guns growing up. Probably why I shoot my Glock 26 with a flush mag better than my 19 or 23... I was taught to shoot without a pinky on the grip anyway.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah man you gotta do what works best for you we don’t discredit anyone’s style or taste in firearms. Thanks for watching and commenting and please be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already

  • @OrieCipollaro
    @OrieCipollaro 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I carry this everyday

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It’s a very formidable carry option. Thanks for watching and please subscribe if you haven’t already

  • @JohnSmith-eo3zl
    @JohnSmith-eo3zl ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I own one with a hammer and I love this little sucker shoots nice within 25 yards self-defense distance ammo does matter though it doesn't like the cheap stuff throws it everywhere

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s just simple and effective that’s all you can ask for. Thanks for watching and commenting and please be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already

  • @mrheedoo11
    @mrheedoo11 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Love mine

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Glad to hear that! Please subscribe if you haven’t already

  • @raiderfan367
    @raiderfan367 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The Airweight is great but you definitely need to train with it. The double action tigger can make the gun move a lot in your hand and training is needed so that your shots don’t go low left of the target. With 5 shots, making each shot count is paramount. I suggest training 5 shots in 5 seconds. Any less time than that and your chances of missing the target increase too much. Any more time than 5 seconds and you put yourself at a disadvantage in terms of shots down range. Just my 2 cents.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you for watching and thank you for the advice. Please be sure to subscribe if you have not already.

    • @ak-488
      @ak-488 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It`s a self defense gun and by the time you put your hand on the gun your threat is gonna be on you, attacks come fast and are violent, theres a video on YT showing at 10 ft a human can cover that distance in less than 2 seconds. you gonna get 2 off if you lucky.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @ak-488 yeah you have to be real quick for sure. That’s why you have to practice practice oractice

    • @TKTroy6
      @TKTroy6 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wen it’s life or death you’ll shoot a revolver so fast will be a crazy show 2 🥺🤲🔥🔥🔥

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Sure thing you will. Thanks for watching and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already

  • @jimmymcclure4549
    @jimmymcclure4549 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I have one. I bought mine as a backup and for undercover use when I was in law enforcement. I also have a an S&W 649 with the shrouded hammer. I prefer that one actually but because of weight and carrying it on my ankle the 642 I have carried more. I have a pocket holster for it although I rarely carry it that way. Mine is accurate. For the roles I used it in it is hard to beat. The air weights in my opinion are to be carried a lot and shot a little, especially with plus p ammo.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      We agree with all that especially the shoot little part lol. Thanks for watching and commenting and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already. Thanks again

  • @johnochicago8457
    @johnochicago8457 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Both the 442 and 642 are great revolvers.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes sir they are. Thanks for watching and commenting and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already. Thanks again

  • @fransiscovilla5113
    @fransiscovilla5113 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I wouldn’t necessarily say that a revolver with a hammer is old school. Smith and Wesson was making hammerless revolver‘s in the late 1800s.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I didn’t know that. Thanks for the info and for watching please be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already

  • @kingzionmusic
    @kingzionmusic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Please check your ammo buy only .38 special it must say .38 SPL on the round itself not just .38 I bout .38 super +p for my 642 thinking it was it was the same as .38 special +P and boy was I wrong I shot it and was sooo powerful I was like dam then it jammed I’m like no way it’s a new gun. So I take it to gun smith and he said I have a guardian angel 👼 because the round blue up in the chamber and didn’t blow my hand and face off. Mind you I’ve been shooting since I was young mostly .223 ruger mini 14 revolvers shotguns and bolt action 22’s merit badge boys scouts in rifle and shotgun. My point is I’m not new to hunting and shooting but I made a life changing mistake so always double and triple check your ammo and show a gun shop the ammo especially if it seems different because the .38 ammo even though it didn’t have the SPL on it I thought it was the same so check y’all.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Absolutely

    • @CaliforniaMortgageLoans
      @CaliforniaMortgageLoans ปีที่แล้ว +1

      IDK but I'm really glad you posted this comment

    • @TKTroy6
      @TKTroy6 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I sholl have allat of 38 super rds it sholl fit in revolver 642 Never test it because like you said, its not .38 spl always do your research before trying new things‼️‼️

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @TKTroy6 truth. Thanks for watching and commenting and please be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already

  • @jessicagrecco5813
    @jessicagrecco5813 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The greatest revolver ever I carry this every day and it definitely gets the job done get one asap

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A must have for any gun guy or gal. Thanks for watching and thank you for the support!

  • @peterbye82
    @peterbye82 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Actually a complete waste of time . What a numb presentation

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Didn’t ask you to watch it

  • @randystevens6302
    @randystevens6302 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Easy to carry however for the majority of people it's difficult to shoot accurately.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That is very very true. Thanks for watching and commenting and please be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already. Also follow us on Rumble at rumble.com/v28e28x-sig-sauer-p938-legion-beast-at-the-range-or-a-disappointment-lets-find-out..html

  • @SalomonEspinosa70
    @SalomonEspinosa70 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    6:10 they cops are already on their way

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂😂🤣 thanks for watching and commenting and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already

  • @kingzionmusic
    @kingzionmusic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    U got yours for cheap I bought mine for $700 with the crimson laser grips very high priced of course because the laser but $700 for a revolver is high but she’s a good gun if u use the right ammo 😂 😂

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      For sure thanks for watching and commenting and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already. Thanks again

  • @LA_Commander
    @LA_Commander 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If you prefer an exposed hammer, then just get the model 637, it's the exact same gun but has the exposed hammer. The Ruger LCR had a shrouded hammer when it first came out in 2008 but customers wanted the option of an exposed hammer so they came out with the LCRX. Both are great snub nose revolvers.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes sir I have the LCRX probably my favorite snubby. Thanks for watching and please subscribe if you haven’t already

  • @jessicagrecco5813
    @jessicagrecco5813 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Everyone run run run and defentley get this gun it’s a hands up gun it’s totally worth it get to your local gun store now it’s worth it it’s unbelievable

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I take it that you like the gun lol. My wife carried a Ruger LCRX in .357 for years. Thanks for watching and commenting and please be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already

  • @ViperJon
    @ViperJon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Love the 642 but not this channel.

  • @tapinc2464
    @tapinc2464 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Keep em coming Eugene!!

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Haha that’s my name thanks for watching

  • @RobertPeru2749
    @RobertPeru2749 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Trash? Clean your gun.

  • @drinkinbuddy8264
    @drinkinbuddy8264 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Picking mine up at Dunham’s sports tomorrow. 469.99 may as well before it shoots up right? His review convinced me.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can’t go wrong with this revolver at all. Thanks for watching and commenting and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already. Thanks again

    • @BigWorm3030
      @BigWorm3030 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I paid 650 for one with the laser grips in 2019

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sounds about right!! Thanks for watching and commenting and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already. Thanks again

  • @jeffcolwell7391
    @jeffcolwell7391 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    My wife has a 642 it's her edc has about 100 rounds through it she loves says it shoots really good I never shot it yet told me it does have some recoil and is manageable and she is about 5 foot tall a small woman told her I would like to shoot it sometime soon

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s very snappy but as she said very controllable. Thanks for watching and commenting and please be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already. Thanks again

    • @carlosmorris4510
      @carlosmorris4510 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wow - if a 5ft tall woman can handle it then it can't be too bad! I have a Ruger LCRx and it's also very snappy - especially with +Ps... I think this is true of all compact, extremely lightweight revolvers though.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah Carlos you are right. My wife carry’s a LCRX in 357 and it makes me bleed every time I touch it

    • @carlosmorris4510
      @carlosmorris4510 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GSquaredTactical Oh yeah - wow; I've seen a video of someone shooting .357s out of that one and it has huge recoil! 😄

  • @NatsaryahTX
    @NatsaryahTX 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "Before you buy"
    Too late. I bought the 642 pro series a month ago.

    • @podsmpsg1
      @podsmpsg1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's good. How do you like it?.

    • @NatsaryahTX
      @NatsaryahTX 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I haven't put any rounds through it yet. I have a free range ticket, so I'll be going this weekend. I've been holding on to the little bit of ammo I have.

    • @podsmpsg1
      @podsmpsg1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@NatsaryahTX that's good. I've had one of mine since 2015, only been shot once.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Haha yeah it’s not something you shut much. Thank you guys for watching and commenting and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already. Thanks again

    • @podsmpsg1
      @podsmpsg1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GSquaredTactical I only took it to the range once. Thank you.

  • @zenjon7892
    @zenjon7892 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have Pachmyer Diamond Pro grips, a Wilson Combat 13 lb trigger kit and I bobbed the hammer on my 637. I keep it in a Stiky holster iny pocket. It's very comfortable and easy to carry

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Sweet follow us on facebook and send some pictures. Thanks for watching and commenting and please be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already

  • @ak-488
    @ak-488 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    " some chance of a snag"? When it is a tool you chose to possibly save your life you eliminate anything on that tool that is not needed. It is not a target shooting pistol, the sights are useless, you want your CC gun to fire as soon as you get that finger, any finger, into your attacker who`s probably already on you punching. In reality any threat at 10 ft away your hand should be on your gun.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Haha I agree with the 10’ maybe even 15’ lol. Thanks for watching and commenting and please be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already

  • @adamhenderson6846
    @adamhenderson6846 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    “Revolver fetish” … 🤔😑

  • @Kog_Jah
    @Kog_Jah หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can this gun use 9mm bullets?

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Technically you probably could but it would likely good to far into the cylinder and out of the reach of the firing pin. It’s best to use the ammo the gun was designed for. Thanks for watching and commenting and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already

  • @scotchnstogies5618
    @scotchnstogies5618 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love this gun. But I have to hold low to get center mass shots. Other than that, it’s a little beast with some +P loadings. Absolutely love it. Probably carry it more than my Beretta 92x compact. Just toss it in my pocket or Bianci minimalist holster and I forget the dang thing is on me. Lol. It’s a sweet lil gun for sure imo.

  • @popsmccartney435
    @popsmccartney435 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why would you want a hammer on a pocket gun?

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just preference to each his own. I understand the argument but I prefer a hammer and I can easily put my hand in my pocket (with cargo pants or shorts) and place thumb over hammer so it doesn’t snag on way out and just as it clears the pocket drop the hammer with that same thumb and be ready at a single action 3 pound or less pull allowing a more accurate shot. I practiced at it until it was second nature and as I said to each his own.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for watching and commenting and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already. Thanks again

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And I want ask…”why would you want a revolver without a hammer?!! 😂😂😂

    • @troxle1r
      @troxle1r 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I agree Pops. One advantage of an internal hammer is the ability to shoot the gun while it is still in a coat pocket and not worry about the possibility of the hammer snagging on material.

  • @apologist3574
    @apologist3574 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Did you consider the model 637 which is the same gun with the exposed hammer (more traditional looking)? I like both styles.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I do like a revolver with a hammer. I’m old school so no hammer it’s not really a revolver to me. I’ve since sold this gun I mostly bought It for the review. Thanks for watching and commenting and please be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already

  • @king.L1978
    @king.L1978 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Do you get use to the recoil easy?

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      For sure. Once you know what to expect

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Once you know what to expect yes. Thanks for watching and please be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already

  • @FerociousSniper
    @FerociousSniper ปีที่แล้ว +1

    8½ lb trigger aint bad. The trigger on an M4 is 8 lbs.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No not necessarily I don’t guess. Thanks for watching and please subscribe if you haven’t already!

  • @invictawarrior
    @invictawarrior 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Pachmayr Diamond Pro grips, stoned trigger job and a hammer spring by Wilson combat or Apex of a lowered poundage and this revolver is absolutely top notch. And for it's size and weight is the best choice as compared to many others for me. I think for first shots on target and eliminating failure to feed, eject, magazine partial ejection, jamming against an object and preventing the slide from cycling, forgetting to put one in the chamber. It's the supreme "first shots on target gun". Precisely, because it tends to eliminate those potential points of failure. Notice. I didn't say a revolver can't jam but if you check your revolver and clean it, well. I'd put my money on it and carry a N.Y. reload semi-auto for engagements with ISIS-K

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks for the info we will look into some of this. Thanks for watching and commenting and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already. Thanks again

  • @camhester4251
    @camhester4251 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    that gun is great , that frame lock is bs

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What do you not like it?

    • @camhester4251
      @camhester4251 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GSquaredTactical oh it's the frame lock i don't like on the newer S&W , still love the guns just wish they hadn't added the lock on the side

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I see yeah it was probably some regulation honestly

    • @camhester4251
      @camhester4251 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GSquaredTactical yes insurance

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Figures

  • @podsmpsg1
    @podsmpsg1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I own two. I carry one.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sweet thanks for watching

    • @podsmpsg1
      @podsmpsg1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GSquaredTactical you're welcome. I hope I never I have to pull it.

  • @danjeffers6077
    @danjeffers6077 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks

  • @albertptran
    @albertptran 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for sharing!

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for watching! Please subscribe if you haven’t already

  • @NINrod_M
    @NINrod_M 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I’m glad I watched your video. I wasn’t too sure about the enclosed hammer and this helped me make up my mind. It’s a pass. 🇺🇸

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Believe it or not I’m not a fan either. Thanks for watching and commenting and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already. Thanks again

    • @jessicagrecco5813
      @jessicagrecco5813 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Don’t be a fool it’s a super fantastic revolver

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If you like it you like it. I wouldn’t call you a fool if you didn’t like any gun that I do like as everyone is different. Thanks for watching

  • @KWin-ik5cl
    @KWin-ik5cl 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just purchased my 642-2. I too was impressed with its handling at the range. And YES, it is cute. Lol. Thanks for the upload

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s a quality option for a backup no doubt. Thanks for watching and commenting and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already. Thanks again

  • @radiohobbyist13
    @radiohobbyist13 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Painful to shoot, got rid of mine.

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That it is. Not enough to get rid of it but I feel ya. Thanks for watching and commenting and be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already. Thanks again

    • @LA_Commander
      @LA_Commander 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's too bad. You could have installed the larger and softer Hogue grips for $25 and the gun would have felt 100% better

    • @GSquaredTactical
      @GSquaredTactical  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Love Houge grips for revolvers. Thanks for watching and commenting and please be sure to subscribe if you haven’t already