(Hearthstone) Rush Warrior VS Post-Nerf Druid

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 120

  • @YetAnotherYoutuber
    @YetAnotherYoutuber 5 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    “Primitive.”
    -Zilliax, talking to a druid player.

  • @rustyhughes
    @rustyhughes 5 ปีที่แล้ว +225

    A rush deck but still no space for Akali. Feels bad rhino man.

    • @aliasmackentosh5851
      @aliasmackentosh5851 5 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      when lich king and DKs rotate out akali will be auto include as a key piece.

    • @The_Aleph_Null
      @The_Aleph_Null 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Poor people, trying to make themselves feel better about opening a shit legendary OMEGALUL

    • @xelo8320
      @xelo8320 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      This is just Kibler's take on Rush Warrior tho. Other decks run Akali too.

    • @jackdrummond5700
      @jackdrummond5700 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      rustyhughes @@

    • @aliasmackentosh5851
      @aliasmackentosh5851 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@The_Aleph_Null akali is great. even with the low stats it's still a rush minion meaning board impact and it gives you a massive turn following it with things like a 3 mana 8/8

  • @ZoMbi5lAy3r
    @ZoMbi5lAy3r 5 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    Playing Druid post Mana Ramp nerf? The madman!

  • @andrwarrior
    @andrwarrior 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    this deck would often beat druids pre-nerf regardless... there's just so much minion pressure, and weapons to capitalize off of rush. It generally needed the Keleseth to beat the fast ramp hands, however.

  • @gametheory3458
    @gametheory3458 5 ปีที่แล้ว +118

    Rush deck without the two newly released rush synergy cards. FeelsBadMan, rhino lives matter

    • @hunter_michelie4425
      @hunter_michelie4425 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      The Spirit relies on playing it out on the same turn you play a rush minion leading to a dead card in a hand when you don't have one.
      Akali's effect, while powerful, is really difficult to set up, and with the rampant Freezing Traps from Hunters having basically 3 a game due to Zul'jin, makes Akali really weak overall.,

    • @phierle1061
      @phierle1061 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hunter_michelie4425 Zul'jin spell hunter is really weak, most decks at rank 5 right now are aggro decks which leaves no time for hunter to play Zul'jin, let alone reach turn 10.

    • @oniuserjh
      @oniuserjh 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@phierle1061 * let alone

    • @phierle1061
      @phierle1061 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@oniuserjh Ah thanks didn't notice.

    • @rogaldorn4759
      @rogaldorn4759 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@hunter_michelie4425
      Very valid. The recent nerfs, which caused the meta-shift, allowing Spell Hunters to be overrepresented, mean value plays with mechs and cards like Akali and SoR can be, and often are, severely crippled, by freezing trap alone.

  • @Crawdithe98
    @Crawdithe98 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Props for the druid not conceding immediately after Twig got destroyed.

  • @epicfilms90
    @epicfilms90 5 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Quite a boring, one-sided game.

  • @winnerchickendinner7004
    @winnerchickendinner7004 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Ah classic druid is took all game and we still does't know what deck he playing ( literally 25 druid card and 5 other card is win condition )

  • @Solemhs
    @Solemhs 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice Video and happy new year!

  • @eksskellybur
    @eksskellybur 5 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Kibler's Deck is not fully golden REEEEEE

    • @korona3103
      @korona3103 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      If your hero is golden it should really give you a golden coin...

  • @xelo8320
    @xelo8320 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    And this is why I'm glad Druid is dead at least for now, even if many sources say it wasnt the best pre-nerfs. Not having to punch through 2 Spreading Plagues and tons of armor improved my overall enjoyment of the game.

    • @resee9856
      @resee9856 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      And yet they didn't nerf these cards that would've rotated anyway. They nuked core druid cards that make druid shit now, in the future, and in wild. These nerfs will definitely be reversed at least in part, if Blizzard aren't literally braindead which, to be fair, is a very real possibility

    • @xelo8320
      @xelo8320 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      While I agree that decimating a class like they did with Druid is not healthy for the game, it really makes you think how Druid cannot stay relevant in any way by playing at the same amount of mana as all other classes.

    • @resee9856
      @resee9856 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@xelo8320 Well yeah, it's their core mechanic. Imagine playing a rogue deck without combo cards. This can change for a rotation like it did for mage with the introduction of an INSANELY OP card like book of specters but you can bet your ass you're going straight back to fireballs when it rotates

    • @Skullhawk13
      @Skullhawk13 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're aware that a massive number of viable rogue decks have existed without including any combo cards right? Furthermore the druid's core class identity has always been flexibility front and center. Ramp cards were just a part of the package. There was something seriously wrong with druid because every druid deck was basically exactly the same, with the difference being which win condition you included. You ALWAYS put wild growth and nourish into it, didn't matter what type of deck it was. Token, Ramp, Combo, Quest, Odd or Even would pack whichever one fit them, they were simply too powerful, and they would never rotate out. While it's true a better solution would've been to hall of fame them, something had to be done or druid would continue to stagnate indefinitely.
      Even cards like truesilver, Consecration, Fireball and frostbolt, despite seeing a TON of play, decks can exist without them, that wasn't really the case for these two cards, any druid decks not including them were generally very very bad.
      While it's true they should've nerfed Spreading plague and stuff, a nerf to druid's ramp was a LONG time coming, it was very oppressive, and now druid can go back to focusing on flexibility and other things.

    • @resee9856
      @resee9856 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Skullhawk13 Yeah, you're gonna have to prove your massive claim cause it ain't true. Like I said decks like elemental mage can pop up from OP cards currently in rotation but core OP cards always come back. So now blizzard have another class like warlock that has a terrible core package and they have to constantly pump them with good cards. They probably will try to do that to get you to buy more packs because they want more more more money. The game is now harder to balance yet again by blizzard's inability to understand how balancing works or their intentional sabotage of core packages to get you to buy even more of their new packs. And why didn't they try nerfing only one card first to see what happens and not this massive change? Because fuck it, they don't care about balance, everyone knew that druid would be dead in the water for the rest of the rotation at the least but blizzard would get their money from people rerolling into other classes. Didn't think of that, did ya, you genius?

  • @SkipperinoHS
    @SkipperinoHS 5 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    0:00

  • @davidbeast415
    @davidbeast415 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Now they just need to nerf Deathstalker Rexxar.

  • @ahoy1014
    @ahoy1014 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What's the significance in running Mountainfire Armor in this deck? Is it simply for being a (3) 4/3? It seems like such an odd include for the deck.

    • @bumponalog5001
      @bumponalog5001 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Planetesimal counter to priest combo?

    • @ahoy1014
      @ahoy1014 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I suppose it does allow for dodging the initial 40 damage (assuming you're referring to Mind Blast Priest), but wouldn't the armor spells, along with a hero power or two, be more beneficial? Mountainfire's armor is both a deathrattle, meaning it can be delayed a few turns, and is conditionalised by the fact it needs to be your opponent's turn; you cannot choose to activate it yourself.
      I dare to wager a card draw tool of the same cost but with 1 less armor would be more advantageous to counter Priest's combo than a 4/3 body with only a chance of getting you your armor.

    • @Melficzeero
      @Melficzeero 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ahoy1014 paying 3 mana to cycle and gain 5 armor is a lot worse than paying 3 for a 4/3 that gives you armor in a proactive deck

  • @kingbigyoshi4685
    @kingbigyoshi4685 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    8:10 impossible, perhaps the archives are incomplete?

  • @rastrisfrustreslosgomez544
    @rastrisfrustreslosgomez544 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    hmmm I'm not sold on the mountainfire armor, I mean it has great stats, don't get me wrong, but you have exactly zero uses for all that armor. I would rather run a secon ooze and something else. Second sul'thraze anyone?

  • @FacterinoCommenterino
    @FacterinoCommenterino 5 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    First! John Dunlop was the inventor of the first practical pneumatic tyre, first used on bicycles and later on motor cars. Facterino Kripperino was the first to comment on this video.

  • @hanuskamenik1411
    @hanuskamenik1411 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why dot have Woodcutters axe and Akali??

    • @ioris8363
      @ioris8363 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Woodcutter is ok but tempo is more important. Akali is hard to justify when literally everything else is better.

  • @shaneee3113
    @shaneee3113 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mountainfire armor in constructed LUL

  • @sIeeperagent
    @sIeeperagent 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Things a people didn't say 4 months ago:" A Druid?!"

  • @Saico_no_hero
    @Saico_no_hero 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's funny cause without the nerfs he would have lost to twig, by having it one turn early. Thnx blizzard

  • @semiautomatico4045
    @semiautomatico4045 5 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Druid is actually dead

    • @spidery7618
      @spidery7618 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Way too dead, the nerfs should've targeted different cards instead of ramp

    • @Authoity4576
      @Authoity4576 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Jozko Krssak wild growth and nourish have been a problem since release, was definitely right to nuke them from orbit

    • @Blaine_themono
      @Blaine_themono 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Authoity4576 nourish wasnt even played till UI was printed, how was it a problem?

    • @ianrey7899
      @ianrey7899 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@Authoity4576 you must mean that Wild Growth and Nourish were balanced before Ultimate Infestation, Spreading Plague and Branching Paths.

    • @segalliongaming8925
      @segalliongaming8925 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's understandable that Wild Growth was nerfed, given how often it was played over the years. Nourish, however, did not see as much play until Ultimate Skillfestation. It probably should have been left alone.

  • @Tantemify
    @Tantemify 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    RIP druid.

  • @Imkaje
    @Imkaje 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    It cracks me up. We never even found out what kind of druid he was. Could have been togwaggle, maly. Who knows?

  • @tacticalpacciani6147
    @tacticalpacciani6147 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What were the nerfs?

    • @Raxxer1993Q8
      @Raxxer1993Q8 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      carlo formosa
      Nourish & Wild Growth cost 1 additional Mana.

    • @tacticalpacciani6147
      @tacticalpacciani6147 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Raxxer1993Q8 only 2 cards nerfed,strange...thanks btw

  • @Tenkkou
    @Tenkkou 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wtf,kibler got a hold of the new hearthstone class?

  • @ashenshugarx2033
    @ashenshugarx2033 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    hey brian long time fan first time that im leaving a comment i think u r an awesome player and a cool dude... why u dont use akali in this deck?

    • @DDismas
      @DDismas 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I can answer for him!
      Akali is just too slow in this kind of deck, and although it's value is really high, it's not worth to waste 8 mana (A dead turn) for a 5/5 that will most likely die in one turn and is NOT assured to overkill anything (As it has to kill a minion with 4 health or less).
      It's a good card, but not a great card. It doesn't have any instantaneous impact on the game.

    • @malunggay4103
      @malunggay4103 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      to add for @@DDismas here, Lich King is both an active and a reactive turn with a better value post turn which is why it is better than akali that MIGHT get you cycle and value but for slower pace. This rush warrior is designed to, well, RUSH the opponent and that is why there are chargers(korkron and grommash) and cyclers(town crier and countess ashmore). in its current state akali still has no place in rush warrior, but maybe someday in the rotation.

    • @ashenshugarx2033
      @ashenshugarx2033 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      thank u for the answer guys :)

  • @wedgeex
    @wedgeex 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Druid is so dumpstered now.

    • @styxxhs8048
      @styxxhs8048 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wesley Kinslow and they still put up a good fight...

  • @shenGaoren177
    @shenGaoren177 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    How can I make this deck into wild

    • @lMarcusl
      @lMarcusl 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Depends. Do you like losing every game to Odd Rogue, Even Shaman and Resurrect Priest? If yes, play this in Wild.

    • @Block1618
      @Block1618 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@lMarcusl I don't think that really true, this deck or some wild variation should do quite well against aggressive decks lots of efficient high tempo removal and life gain. I think it would struggle against resurrect priest though you are correct, very little gained from the rush tempo.

    • @shenGaoren177
      @shenGaoren177 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lMarcusl Hey so have hit legend with tempo warrior in wild last month odd rogue was my best match. Big priest was hard but winnable through frothing. Even shaman is 50/50. My worste match up was even warlock and spell hunter.

    • @shenGaoren177
      @shenGaoren177 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Block1618 he was very weird playing my 3 mana rush card with no Minions on the field

    • @lMarcusl
      @lMarcusl 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Block1618 Have you seen what those three decks do in Wild? You already acknowledged the issues with Resurrect Priest, but let me go through the other two.
      Even Shaman: This deck's plays are pathetic compared to Even Shaman's, and the deck has essentially no answers to anything the Even Shaman does. It can't kill a turn 2 Totem Golem, Turn 4 Flamewreathed Faceless, its only efficient answer to free Things from Below is Militia Commander, which takes most of the turn, and the Warrior gains absolutely no utility out of its hero power, where the Shaman is swarming the board from turn 1. Also, Sea Giants wreck your day. The Shaman will sieze control of the board early and the Rush Warrior won't be able to wrest it back because almost all of the Shaman's minions are way more efficient than the Rush package. A 3 mana 3/3 Rush is just sad when the Shaman already has a 2 mana 3/4 on board, or a 1 mana Stoneclaw Totem protecting their Flametongue. The Rush Warrior won't even get a foot in the door.
      Against Odd Rogue the situation is a little better, since their board isn't nearly as sticky, but once again, your hero power does nothing, while theirs clears essentially every Rush minion in the deck once it's done its Rush trade. You run your Worgen into a Patches, next turn it dies to the dagger. You run your Militia Commander into their Hench Clan Thug before it grows too big, next turn, daggered. The Rush Warrior would need a turn 1 Finley Murrglton for a Mage, Druid or Rogue hero power almost every game to keep the Rogue's board under control before the Fungalmancers and Cold Bloods start raining down.
      The Odd and Even mechanics fuck every non-odd/non-even deck in the ass pretty hard in Wild. When you play aggro, you're just a worse version of Odd Rogue, when you play midrange, you're just a worse version of Even Shaman because they get so much value out of their hero power consistently, while your value has to be drawn in the right order to keep up with them. And if you try anything slower than those two, Resurrect Priest happens.

  • @FacterinoCommenterino
    @FacterinoCommenterino 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    First!What starts with "F" and ends with "t"? "FirstCommenterinoKripperinoisalwaysfirst"

    • @kion9001
      @kion9001 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Facterino Commenterino you double commented

  • @OsvaldoChannel1
    @OsvaldoChannel1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    isn't Pilfered powder just better now? at worst it's just as good as Wild growth now

    • @dubspool
      @dubspool 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's a Gadgetzan card

    • @oniuserjh
      @oniuserjh 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      yep in wild there is no reason to run wild growth over the other ramp cards besides the death rattle one, wonder if this will make more people run jade druid...or maybe a jade package

    • @willsheridan270
      @willsheridan270 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You would still run wild growth over jade blossom if you want the excess mana card it gives you at 10 mana crystals

    • @OsvaldoChannel1
      @OsvaldoChannel1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@willsheridan270 you would still play jade blossom in Jade Druid thou

    • @OsvaldoChannel1
      @OsvaldoChannel1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dubspool oh I forgot sry :)

  • @justanenglishcommentpassin644
    @justanenglishcommentpassin644 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1:02

  • @sev343
    @sev343 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    heyyy kibler

  • @HeloisGevit
    @HeloisGevit 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Never have I seen a class as bad as Druid now.

    • @kingbling7571
      @kingbling7571 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why is that so?

    • @mancubwwa
      @mancubwwa 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Kharazan era Priest was waay worse... people have short memory

    • @iamnerd69
      @iamnerd69 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Pre grand tournament shaman was a meme. I remember seeing video of some professional player from that time with 8 lvl 60 and golden classes and lvl 20 shaman xd

    • @moonlight2870
      @moonlight2870 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Priest used to have It way worse

    • @taufiqbmr
      @taufiqbmr 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Paladin during gadgetzan lol

  • @ivanochiaramello4617
    @ivanochiaramello4617 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sque Sque

  • @nighthrashchannel8627
    @nighthrashchannel8627 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Sadly i dont understand the nerf to druid. Like maybe if they did it near the rotation but it aint the case. Druid class look so weak at the moment.
    Thanks for the video.

    • @ArubatoBerumundo
      @ArubatoBerumundo 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Because many Druis decks was on leadder for to much time, thats maybe why they nerf druid?

    • @Block1618
      @Block1618 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@ArubatoBerumundo Apart from the data said the opposite was true, druid was one of the lower win rate classes and almost least played pre nerf.

    • @Tecmaster96
      @Tecmaster96 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Block1618 could you post that data? I’d be very interested in seeing it

    • @nighthrashchannel8627
      @nighthrashchannel8627 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Treant token is still okay but it doesnt synergize well with the new cards. Like when you transform treant into 5/5 they arent treant anymore therefore mulchmuncher is useless. Maybe druid strength is the now reduce to even or odd since those deck benefit from a free upgraded power wich are actually killing most of the deck in standart....i hope they arent that strong after the rotation. (Personnal opinion)

    • @kingbling7571
      @kingbling7571 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Saw like 50 mechathun druids all op still, i think they shud have nerfed nourish to 8 and wild growth to 5

  • @Denzelidos
    @Denzelidos 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    PepeHands Let him win

  • @AlexAlex-zq5wz
    @AlexAlex-zq5wz 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    With 6 rush minions that's not rush warrior

    • @ioris8363
      @ioris8363 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Names don't really matter.

    • @AlexAlex-zq5wz
      @AlexAlex-zq5wz 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ioris8363 I clicked to see the video because of the title and the fact i like that deck and that list doesn't even run akali..clockbait in my opinion that's why I write a comment in the first place

    • @ioris8363
      @ioris8363 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      My point still stands.

    • @tyralion3666
      @tyralion3666 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Alex Alex because it doesn’t have new cards in it doesn’t mean it isn’t rush Warrior, a lot of the minions in the deck have rush. therefore it can be considered Rush warrior.
      “clickbait” lmao

    • @AlexAlex-zq5wz
      @AlexAlex-zq5wz 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tyralion3666 I made my point clear

  • @ArgentumEmperio
    @ArgentumEmperio 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    ... why was this match uploaded exactly?
    It ain't interesting and at most panders to folks being happy about cards having to be nerfed rather than finding a more interesting spot for druid so....
    Why was this boring monotone game uploaded...?

    • @tyralion3666
      @tyralion3666 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ArgentumEmperio ...why was this comment made exactly?
      it’s not interesting and at most panders to the crybaby whiners rather than just enjoying the free content that you’re not obligated to watch.
      why was this boring monotone comment made...?

  • @alianloh
    @alianloh 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    2nd boiz