Poleaxe: It's a the halberd of the nobility. Halberd: It's the pollaxe of the soldiery. Billhook: It's the poleaxe of the gardener. Makes a great halberd. Guisarme: It's the continental gardener's billhook, makes a great halberd.
Good info, as always. I like how you differentiated between who tended to use each, that it was far from absolute, and that over time the overlap increased. Clarifying Tod's video. The bit about the discs on the rondels covering gaps in gauntlets I thought was especially cool. I try to position my EDC gear and battle rattle the same way, for every little bit of protection I can get
About your last point on gentrification of weapons associated with "lower status" we can find something which may be relevant, I think, for early-ish occurence, in Hans Talhoffer's Königsegg Treatise from the 1450's as, when covering the various aspects of a formal knightly duel, he gives a list of equipements amongst those we can find two types of messers.
At about 15:50, a first in the long history of the analyses of militaries and weaponry: a bullocks dagger was described as possessed of the comparatively LESS crude design. Yes, I realize that the adjective was used to describe physical properties and feeling in the hand of the hilt/guard, but since that part of the dagger is literally the eponymous bollocks, it seemed a moment amusingly counterintuitive enough to warrant a brief commemoration. If you don't like it, well then...never mind the bollocks.
So you're making a video that's to be an appendix to Tod's video about bollocks... The real question is whether Lloyd or Shad will make a video about another part.
Finally got one of his daggers. It is so awesome and well made. Hope to get a another soon. Interesting the sources talked about rondel daggers but the other kind were more common...
For anyone on the fence about Todd's stuff, it is worth it, so well made and nice to look at to boot. I couldn't afford a dagger, got one of his small knives, love it. Want a dagger one day. It is well worth the $.
Any chance we could get a video talking about the “antenna” dagger? It seems to be rather under appreciated, and there’s not that much out there about them.
I had seen Tod's video on the subject and yours adds some interesting perspective. In terms of a subject for you to cover: What about the Dirk, in general evolution and in its Naval and Highland forms?
It's late Matt, I just got back from my HEMA club, De Taille et D'Estoc, where we did some one handed longsword with Fiore.. But I'll watch this, I can't ignore this *knowledge*
From my re-enactment work, the common people of the 11th Century were all using a Scramasax knife, possible this morphed into or was superseded by the bollock dagger as metal working became more prevalent and the cost allowed the lower classes to afford a previously higher status tool.
What about quillon daggers? I feel that they are really overrepresented in modern pop culture, but also feel like the history enthusiasts don't really talk about them. Maybe because they are kinda boring? By whom, how and when were they used and how often?
They seem to be more knightly, and appear before rondel daggers did, more of a classic crossguard like swords from the 12th century, so familiar to fighters using those weapons, and logical design for those smiths who already made swords. Looks like they always stuck around even when rondel daggers and bollock daggers became the hip thing to have. Personally I love the classic design of them but I just had to get a bollock dagger for my collection, they're just so amusing to show off to people who've never seen them before. I think quillon daggers are overrepresented cause modern people see them as familiar, since in WWII all the commando style daggers drew upon that design somewhat.
One of the points Todd makes is the handles on ballock daggers were fairly short. If originally they were utilitarian the grip might have the fingers curved around the ballocks with the blade between them. The Dene in northern Canada used a volute knife so they could easily use it while wearing mittens.
It's interesting you say that: I have a bollock dagger (as part of a Medieval costume, I don't fight with it) and I've noticed it does feel a much better grip to use the bollocks as part of the handle.
Thank you Matt ! as a tool user I have real difficulty visualising the Bollock dagger ‘s. grip as being much use on a peasant’s working knife, I’m not saying it would be impossible to use, but certainly difficult and unwieldy. I would like a list of tasks that you think would be easy to perform with a 9” ( minimum) triangular blade and a very small fragile, grip !
Well as a fighting peasant who runs the risk of getting butchered by a burly dude who has some armor or if you are really unlucky, a lot of armor having a rondel dagger might be more reassuring than having a joke dagger :).
Thanks for pointing the versatility of the ballock out. I've always preferred the design of copies I've seen, particularly Tod's, now I will be able to appreciate their potential greater usefulness also, thanks.
Two things: I have before been introduced to the concept that the gentrification of these weapons was tied to the success of the Landsknecht companies in the late 15 and early 16th centuries. Secondly, I have a bollock dagger for sparing that I wear horizontally. I find that the bollocks make it very easy to draw and use in a variety of situations with either the point forward or backwards. I can even draw it with the right hand so that the point is forward by thumbing the blade and bollocks, even at a horizontal carry.
I see a great analogy between lower class soldiers and bowmen buying or otherwise getting their hands on rondel daggers, the same as modern city dwellers driving 4x4s. It may be designed for a particular use but if people like it then people use it.
The rondel dagger's forward disc might also help prevent the dagger from sinking too far into the opponent and entangling the dagger or the hand armor in the opponent's armor. You talked about how the forward disc helps increase the force of the thrust of the dagger, the back disc could increase the force of the dagger in removing the dagger, so it is not left stuck in something removing the dagger from use - like a orthopedic slaphammer Interesting presentation.
From the 5th to the 1st century BCE there was a type of sword in use in France, Switzerland and Southern Germany that has some resemblance to the bollock dagger. In German "Knollenknaufschwert" and French "Epée à rognons".
Older rondel daggers must have fallen out of fashion and either passed into the market for used weapons or been given as gifts to retainers, they probably weren't popular for civilian wear as the hilts get in the way so some blades must have been rehilted in a different form. Medieval humour is frequently crude and obvious, the fuest bollock daggers would likely have been a regarded as works of comic genius. In most of the world there's a continuous history of combination large utility and fighting knives from their iron ages to today's gaucho knives, bowies, kukris, etc..
An interesting face. The Cold Steel Scottish Dirk, which I own, and have for many years. Has the flared pommel disc/end cap. And the some what of a Ballock knife design at the Bolster. A good dirk, its killed many a wild Haggis.
I think the bollocks should indeed help with edge alignment -only not so much in a fight. If you used one of those as a tool (whittling, cooking, cutting ropes and, of course, eating), they should indeed be useful. Especially so as their rounded shape makes it more comfortable to put the thumb over the apex of one of them. And who would make more frequent tool-style use of their dagger -bowmen or knights?
"I have no money to reward you for your service, but I have advice to last a lifetime: Your thumb on the blade and strike upwards." -- G. K. Chesterton
Hi Matt, really enjoyed the video, nice addition to Tod's. I'm curious if you've done anything on the Cinquedea or Main Gauches? I am also fond of the aesthetics of the "Swiss hunting dagger".
Armored or unarmored? I expect armored would have more to do with the design of the armor, followed by the grappling techniques most common at the time in that area, with the dagger design itself being the least influential factor.
Aztecs and other American cultures used them for rites as well. They used to have ritual wars were the main goal was to capture warriors alive for then to be offered as sacrifice. Obsidian daggers were used to take the hearts out of the living bastards who lose in battle. Since the objective of the ritual wars wasn’t to kill, daggers in mesoamerican culture weren’t use in battle until the Spanish arrived.
@@eoagr1780 respectfully, that sounds like a rather big leap from Aztecs tried to take prisoners whenever they could to the entire region never used daggers in combat until Europeans arrived.
Depends on the dagger type but regardless a dagger is predominantly a stabbing weapon. The name derived from a German word degen meaning to stab. At least that's what I was taught and read.
Speaking of different ways of gripping the dagger, do you think they were ever used with an index finger over the guard/bollock style of grip? At least for me with my bollock dagger (Landsknecht Emporium dagger that they apparently don't sell anymore) it feels like the most natural way of holding the dagger and it allows for a grip where the wrist is almost perfectly in line with the thrust.
Olli Stenroos It is not a bad way to hold a blade since one get maximum reach with a straight arm but thumb on blade is better for upward thrusts ie. under ribs, belly or kidneys but then towards face and groin index finger on ought to be good. Thumb on blade is a stronger grip I think. Det e' fult att peka finger.
I found this channel thanks to Tod talking bollocks, There is something satisfying about the cock and ball jokes made possible by these things, I do believe the bollock daggers were primarily carried by less armoured people to show that they have more balls than armour.
Something I would like to see investigated is the bauernwehr or "nailed" peasant knife. The presence of the nail, to me, seems to suggest a combat application, but I am unaware of any source that actually talks about such a thing. Could this be due to the typically low status of such a blade?
You’re right I would definitely be interested in seeing the story of the immediate predecessors of these knives, but going back a few centuries to the Saxon/Viking daggers/seaxes - what this video makes me wonder even more is “why did it take so long to put an upper guard/bolster on knives like this??” I know the seax (and early Dark Age swords) were all about the hewing and slashing, but they must have stabbed with them sometimes? And surely must have encountered the issue of hands slipping up onto blades? I know - understandably - you disliked lots of the weaponry in The Last Kingdom, but the main character’s kinda-seax-thing has quillons, and although not historically accurate it does seem to make much more sense than having nothing to bolster your hand on your fighting knife. So what’s the deal?
The evidence of the Mary Rose suggests that it’s likely that many, possibly even most men on the ship carried Ballock daggers, suggesting they would be utility knives or soldiers and sailors alike. Carrying both types of dagger would likely be an inconvenience. The Ballock dagger is a better multi-use knife, so why wouldn’t they be popular?
The point of bare handed fighting seems the most accurate to me the rondell would be uncomfortable bare handed but still a stronger penetrator. While the bollock far more maneuverable bare handed to either find gaps in between plate or mail although I'd think you could drive a strong bollock through mail or Gambeson .
I'm going to assume Messer blades are full tang. Technically they are not swords. They are made like a knife. Lang Messer I think means Long Knife . Hence sword restrictions don't apply to them. If this is the case then it's at least been since the 1300's.
I'd like to see more videos about other knife and dagger types apart from the ones you and Tod have already covered several times. In other words, what else is out there?
Matt has statement on the order that for both styles of dagger that one can tell from the hilts that they were fighting daggers and not tools. I would have thought that obvious from the blades.
By the way...maybe I've missed it, but is there a video focused on spear points? It's always called the king of weapons and I'd love to hear a deep dive on their evolution.
The thing that immediately suggests itself to me about the bollock dagger is comfort while wearing it in a belt or thigh scabbard. A disc would be massively uncomfortable and potentially quite the source of injury if you fell on it. I really don't like to think about how awful a rondel dagger would be to wear as a routine side arm on a daily basis, especially while unarmoured. A bollock dagger seems, to me, to be a daily wearer whereas a rondel dagger might be something you'd get out of a cupboard if you were expecting to have to take on a battle in part or full armour. You don't walk around in full armour all the time, why would you? But a bollock dagger would be bloody useful to have on your person whenever you were wandering about just in case you got into a fight unexpected. You're also far less likely to clonk it into things while going about your day. Also, surely they're far more easily concealed under a cloak etc. The point about gloved vs not gloved is definitely a good one but to me, most of the time with a dagger you're carrying it around just in case. Therefore there's always the compromise between utility in combat and them being a pain in the arse as you move around while not fighting. The bollock dagger doesn't snag on things like a cross guard and doesn't unnecessarily protrude sideways making you endlessly bash into stuff as you edge past it. To me, the bollock dagger looks like a mighty fine example of such a compromise. It stops you slicing your own hand by sliding up the blade if you do have to stick it in another chap, which is harder than it looks, but isn't such a pain in the arse to wear that you're tempted to just lob it in a cupboard. I think I'd definitely want one if I were in such a time period where being constantly armed is preferable but you're also unlikely to be fighting at any given moment. However, if someone were attacking my house and I had time I'd head for the cupboard for the really serious kit.
Interesting thought, I wonder if bollock daggers developed from knockoff rondels. Obviously people would have made cheap copies of early rondels with the flared pommel, then someone cuts off the sides of the disk to make it more practical, then somebody carves channels down the center to make it more comfortable to use and lo and behold you have a crude bollock dagger.
I think most people miss two things. Aviabillity and deployability aka "oh sh.t" deployment in regards to backup&sidearms. I wonder if they used shorter daggers at that time too. The roman pugio should have some sucessors if one thinks about it but seems to have been lost somewhere in the dark ages until pretty much north america was setteled. It would be easy to make a broken triangular bajonett or so into a "hideout"/boot/wherever weapon but i haven`t seen sources for this yet.
How correct is it to have a bollock dagger with an ebony handle? Ebony is a tropical wood and I think would have been rather rare in Europe at this time. I think the bollock’s bollocks evolved as a easy, cheap way to make a knife that provided protection for your hand sliding forward instead of making and fitting a guard. As a knife maker I can tell you making a knife with a guard adds expense and time to making a knife.
Like many things from the Medieval period, they look fucking stupid to my modern eyes. (Much like hose, codpieces, kettle helmets, and long toed shoes or sabatons.)
@@chromarush1749 I don't. We know that medieval Europeans had a crude and bawdy sense of humour, and anybody that doesn't see the bollock dagger's unmistakable similarity to an erect phallus is just trying too hard to be a straight-laced Victorian lady.
The Geneva Convention, specifically bans tri-edge blades. I understand why, but what sword or most likely dagger was common enough that it makes an appearance in literally the rules of war?
what came first the rondel as an armor piece or the rondel dagger, if tis the rondel armor (which i think came first) wouldent that alone be evidence that this is an armored persons sword, your taking a part of armor that is used to fill gaps with a dagger
Is there any certain way these were attached to a belt? Were they simply tied on with a half hitch knot? And if so how was the leather strap wrapped around the belt?
i think those cords are not entirely accurate they eere prpbably more complex in construction... for example real originals ive seen preserved in museums the cord is much stouter and mayny times the traw string in in the back of the sheath so youd slid it on your belt and draw it likea drawstring tight to your liking.. not just rudely tied like a shoelace
Convenience and necessity. The longer the guard, the more awkward it makes daily carry (mind, they did get longer with parrying daggers) . Probably increased the cost, too, due to additional material and work. And you are not going to rely on the quillons of daggers nearly as much as compared to a sword (you are going to catch offending blades a lot less with the shorter dagger blade than with longer sword blades) unless you are specifically using it in that way (parrying dagger, and even they had shorter quillion versions) in the first place, especially considering that you have to come in a lot closer with daggers and thus it is going to cover a much smaller field of potential attacks already.
@@scholagladiatoria wow, that doesn't look like a 15" blade in your hand as the measurements on his page say. Ive had my eye on that for awhile. Thanks for all the great videos, keep up the good work and thank you for the response.
Don’t you think that what one carried also , as for military, was determined by the crafter of the crown not to mention the speed they could be turned out.
Matt, do you think painters and other artists drawing these scenes and characters could have been misinformed, like modern artists are today in relation to military equipment?
medieval people were far more intune with violence and warefare than modern people are.. their depicitions are fare more accurate than what ours are today.. everything they drew had significance for them... unlike now... you must think ALL people in that time carried arms.. even women and children carred knives and daggers.. many art shows regular people armed at meals.. in taverns.. at markets or working in the feilds... not just witha dagger by more substantial arms.. this can be considered when you look that medoeval cities like oxford or london had murder rates of 100-200 per 100000...... that os murders from disagreements, fights, ect not duels or war.. .. which is insane.... people did an exceptionally large amount of murder in that time... wjen you see the muslim middle east for example most people go without arms in public or at best a small dagger in art of the time.. europe in that period was considered a particulary dangerious place to travel.. medieval europeans- not active soliders... are depicted even in art in light body armor in casuial public settings, carrying bucklers, swords ect... rural areas were probably even more violent, unlike for example the near east disputes could be resolved by combatting the person you conflicted with and jusk killing them without great consequences.. or none at all... blood money, feuds, fleeing to other towns or obtaining sanctuary could also be used.. average life was ignorant and violent.. we view the middle ages from the writings of monks.. external observers... but most europeans in northern and central europe continued to follow their traditional- mostly germanic tribal customs but in an increasingly complex society.. causing constant conflicts.. depictions of arms being carried and used were probably one thing those observersg monks... got very accurate
Poleaxe: It's a the halberd of the nobility.
Halberd: It's the pollaxe of the soldiery.
Billhook: It's the poleaxe of the gardener. Makes a great halberd.
Guisarme: It's the continental gardener's billhook, makes a great halberd.
I love how he embraced all the dickjokes and just rolls with them now
Hasn’t always been the case :)
I guess our sense of humor finally achieved massive penetration.
GarandThumb has superior comment-section synergy though. It's impressive.
@@TheShieldsMD Given contexts, the ultimate penetration.
Butt, penetration, and swinging.
DragonTigerBoss exactly sir, that’s the spirit!
What a coincidence, I just watched a couple of dagger videos on Tod's channel. Good stuff
Yep. Me as well haha
"Vestigial bollocks" is a phrase I didn't expect to hear today, but I probably should have.
Good info, as always. I like how you differentiated between who tended to use each, that it was far from absolute, and that over time the overlap increased. Clarifying Tod's video. The bit about the discs on the rondels covering gaps in gauntlets I thought was especially cool. I try to position my EDC gear and battle rattle the same way, for every little bit of protection I can get
Matt's delight at the gauntlet pun at about 8:50 🤣
About your last point on gentrification of weapons associated with "lower status" we can find something which may be relevant, I think, for early-ish occurence, in Hans Talhoffer's Königsegg Treatise from the 1450's as, when covering the various aspects of a formal knightly duel, he gives a list of equipements amongst those we can find two types of messers.
“Vestigial Bollocks” 😂😂😂
they are not vestigial, it's cold in the Scottish highlands
They've tightened up to the main body while there has been a swelling of a shaft nearby awaiting a hand to grasp it firmly.
Having been to Scotland I can say that they did go vestigial
@@ColovianFurCap Try SCUBA diving in NW England in winter. Came out and needed a pee. Couldn't find anything to pee with. Very confused I was.
At about 15:50, a first in the long history of the analyses of militaries and weaponry: a bullocks dagger was described as possessed of the comparatively LESS crude design. Yes, I realize that the adjective was used to describe physical properties and feeling in the hand of the hilt/guard, but since that part of the dagger is literally the eponymous bollocks, it seemed a moment amusingly counterintuitive enough to warrant a brief commemoration. If you don't like it, well then...never mind the bollocks.
So you're making a video that's to be an appendix to Tod's video about bollocks... The real question is whether Lloyd or Shad will make a video about another part.
Why not both? All the weapontubers love to talk bollocks.
Well, Lloyd has talked at length about long shafts. How's that for another part
So are we waiting for Shad, Lloyd or Skalagrim to make a spleen to attach on to this appendix?
I don't know. It depends if anyone has the "guts" to broach the topic. Or the "stomach" to do the research. ;)
@@evilwelshman well played
Finally got one of his daggers. It is so awesome and well made. Hope to get a another soon.
Interesting the sources talked about rondel daggers but the other kind were more common...
Phallic intentions is gonna be the name of my homebrew slaaneshi marine chapter for 40k.
Burn Heretic!
Given the Drukhari predilection for taking prizes from their victims I could see it being a particularly intimidating name for a Drukhari host too.
Run away! They're *coming* for us!
Phallic Intentions GSV, the pride of Culture's starfleet.
You'd have to wonder why the chapter was given that name before they turned to heresy.
For anyone on the fence about Todd's stuff, it is worth it, so well made and nice to look at to boot. I couldn't afford a dagger, got one of his small knives, love it. Want a dagger one day. It is well worth the $.
I spy with my little eye............ a teeny tiny Corinthian style helmet on the shelf. >___
Cute
The stories I could tell about my little helmet.
demos113 found it. 😄
@@scholagladiatoria If you had a lego collection it would be among the coolest. 👍
Absolutely adorable.
Any chance we could get a video talking about the “antenna” dagger? It seems to be rather under appreciated, and there’s not that much out there about them.
I had seen Tod's video on the subject and yours adds some interesting perspective. In terms of a subject for you to cover: What about the Dirk, in general evolution and in its Naval and Highland forms?
It's late Matt, I just got back from my HEMA club, De Taille et D'Estoc, where we did some one handed longsword with Fiore..
But I'll watch this, I can't ignore this *knowledge*
Is power
The emperor protects
It’s been a long time since you talked about books. I wish i could zoom in to see the titles on your bookshelf. Thanks for another great video!
From my re-enactment work, the common people of the 11th Century were all using a Scramasax knife, possible this morphed into or was superseded by the bollock dagger as metal working became more prevalent and the cost allowed the lower classes to afford a previously higher status tool.
seax became the hangers and messer and other big peasents knives... i would suggets bollock daggers arrived from the mediterranian
What about quillon daggers? I feel that they are really overrepresented in modern pop culture, but also feel like the history enthusiasts don't really talk about them. Maybe because they are kinda boring? By whom, how and when were they used and how often?
I'd definitely like to hear about that too.
They seem to be more knightly, and appear before rondel daggers did, more of a classic crossguard like swords from the 12th century, so familiar to fighters using those weapons, and logical design for those smiths who already made swords.
Looks like they always stuck around even when rondel daggers and bollock daggers became the hip thing to have.
Personally I love the classic design of them but I just had to get a bollock dagger for my collection, they're just so amusing to show off to people who've never seen them before.
I think quillon daggers are overrepresented cause modern people see them as familiar, since in WWII all the commando style daggers drew upon that design somewhat.
Loving these dagger videos from you and Todd!
One of the points Todd makes is the handles on ballock daggers were fairly short. If originally they were utilitarian the grip might have the fingers curved around the ballocks with the blade between them. The Dene in northern Canada used a volute knife so they could easily use it while wearing mittens.
It's interesting you say that: I have a bollock dagger (as part of a Medieval costume, I don't fight with it) and I've noticed it does feel a much better grip to use the bollocks as part of the handle.
Thank you Matt ! as a tool user I have real difficulty visualising the Bollock dagger ‘s. grip as being much use on a peasant’s working knife, I’m not saying it would be impossible to use, but certainly difficult and unwieldy. I would like a list of tasks that you think would be easy to perform with a 9” ( minimum) triangular blade and a very small fragile, grip !
Unarmoured peasants using armoured fighting daggers?
Trickledown ergonomics.
Well as a fighting peasant who runs the risk of getting butchered by a burly dude who has some armor or if you are really unlucky, a lot of armor having a rondel dagger might be more reassuring than having a joke dagger :).
Yeah but you don't bring weapons to use on yourself, at least I would think not
In a fight for your life you use whatever you have or can get regardless of class or social standing.
@@gusty9053 Rondel daggers are very inconvenient to carry due to the enormous rondels. Bollock daggers worked and were used for a reason.
12:31 That's basically all the spots you can get injured in the SPES heavies as well.
I recently bought the same rondell dagger as shown in the vid from Tod Cutler, can highly recommend!
Thanks for pointing the versatility of the ballock out. I've always preferred the design of copies I've seen, particularly Tod's, now I will be able to appreciate their potential greater usefulness also, thanks.
Two things:
I have before been introduced to the concept that the gentrification of these weapons was tied to the success of the Landsknecht companies in the late 15 and early 16th centuries.
Secondly, I have a bollock dagger for sparing that I wear horizontally. I find that the bollocks make it very easy to draw and use in a variety of situations with either the point forward or backwards. I can even draw it with the right hand so that the point is forward by thumbing the blade and bollocks, even at a horizontal carry.
Wearing the dagger on the right hip I assume?
@@Luziferrum Yes
Great video.... THanks for the upload!
I see a great analogy between lower class soldiers and bowmen buying or otherwise getting their hands on rondel daggers, the same as modern city dwellers driving 4x4s. It may be designed for a particular use but if people like it then people use it.
The rondel dagger's forward disc might also help prevent the dagger from sinking too far into the opponent and entangling the dagger or the hand armor in the opponent's armor. You talked about how the forward disc helps increase the force of the thrust of the dagger, the back disc could increase the force of the dagger in removing the dagger, so it is not left stuck in something removing the dagger from use - like a orthopedic slaphammer
Interesting presentation.
Today on Matts word of the day calendar, "Predominant". ;)
Great video, thanks a lot!
From the 5th to the 1st century BCE there was a type of sword in use in France, Switzerland and Southern Germany that has some resemblance to the bollock dagger. In German "Knollenknaufschwert" and French "Epée à rognons".
There's a novelty - never heard Mat talking bollocks before.
thats because hes all about the shaft.
Thats because hes more into thrusting and penetrating blades and the context of it all.
Older rondel daggers must have fallen out of fashion and either passed into the market for used weapons or been given as gifts to retainers, they probably weren't popular for civilian wear as the hilts get in the way so some blades must have been rehilted in a different form.
Medieval humour is frequently crude and obvious, the fuest bollock daggers would likely have been a regarded as works of comic genius. In most of the world there's a continuous history of combination large utility and fighting knives from their iron ages to today's gaucho knives, bowies, kukris, etc..
4:49
Why do bollocks
Suddenly appear
Everytime
You are near?
Just like me
They long to be
Close to you
A serious look at bollocks.
Was actually quite interesting. I wasn't at all familiar with different types of daggers from this period.
I'm a Maine Gauche, stiletto kinda guy, but those are nice daggers, amazing craftsmanship!!!
>P. S. Being a Duck I prefer using my Bill... 🦆
I quacked up reading this. 😁
I just found this comment and its gone fowl.
Berserk Chapter 331 used the attack to the gap behind the glove. Also included half-swording, grappling and striking with the hilt.
What about the 17C Italian Stiletto dagger like the one Tod Cutler sells?
He says those were for Duelists, Brawlers and the like.
An interesting face. The Cold Steel Scottish Dirk, which I own, and have for many years. Has the flared pommel disc/end cap. And the some what of a Ballock knife design at the Bolster. A good dirk, its killed many a wild Haggis.
watching the video and looking around your "stage" i see that tiny little helm just to the left your right, where can i find a small helm like that?
So the disk pommel is akin to the tape disk or ball on the end of a hockey stick, so you can grab it more easily in clumsy handwear.
This new camera angle / distance is much more "intimate". Suits the subject of this video very well.
Marie rose had alot of bollock daggers but none of the blades survive. hmm 🤔🧐
Rust mate, almost 5 centuries of rusting in salt water.
Wood and bone survived incredibly well but not metals.
jokes don't reach everyone and that's ok.
ships have a habit of making people gay
"Scola Gladiatoria. We might talk a lot of bollocks, but we're not full of 'em."
I think the bollocks should indeed help with edge alignment -only not so much in a fight. If you used one of those as a tool (whittling, cooking, cutting ropes and, of course, eating), they should indeed be useful. Especially so as their rounded shape makes it more comfortable to put the thumb over the apex of one of them.
And who would make more frequent tool-style use of their dagger -bowmen or knights?
"I have no money to reward you for your service, but I have advice to last a lifetime: Your thumb on the blade and strike upwards." -- G. K. Chesterton
Cutting edge towards the enemy or towardy your ellbow?
Was this in manuals? The only ones i found from that time didn`t mention the edge.
Todd "Cutler", pretty good name for a guy that makes blades.
smashesintothings Definition of cutler
: one who makes, deals in, or repairs cutlery
Not his last name.
Many last names were descriptions of a person's occupation such as Smith, Fletcher, Cooper etc.
That's what I thought too - "What a great surname!".
Then I found out it's one of his brands: todcutler.com/ , the other being todsworkshop.com/
His real name is Tod Todeschini
. Maybe he is not comfortable about his Italian last name, so he named himself Tod Cutler.
Matt, can you make a video about navaja or the kindjal?
Not sure how I feel about Matt spending half the video waving his bollocks about, but very informative nonetheless!
Hi Matt, really enjoyed the video, nice addition to Tod's. I'm curious if you've done anything on the Cinquedea or Main Gauches? I am also fond of the aesthetics of the "Swiss hunting dagger".
How would the use of daggers in Europe compare to the usage of similar weapons in other cultures? Say, for example, the Japanese tanto.
Armored or unarmored?
I expect armored would have more to do with the design of the armor, followed by the grappling techniques most common at the time in that area, with the dagger design itself being the least influential factor.
Aztecs and other American cultures used them for rites as well. They used to have ritual wars were the main goal was to capture warriors alive for then to be offered as sacrifice. Obsidian daggers were used to take the hearts out of the living bastards who lose in battle. Since the objective of the ritual wars wasn’t to kill, daggers in mesoamerican culture weren’t use in battle until the Spanish arrived.
@@eoagr1780 respectfully, that sounds like a rather big leap from Aztecs tried to take prisoners whenever they could to the entire region never used daggers in combat until Europeans arrived.
Depends on the dagger type but regardless a dagger is predominantly a stabbing weapon. The name derived from a German word degen meaning to stab. At least that's what I was taught and read.
Speaking of different ways of gripping the dagger, do you think they were ever used with an index finger over the guard/bollock style of grip? At least for me with my bollock dagger (Landsknecht Emporium dagger that they apparently don't sell anymore) it feels like the most natural way of holding the dagger and it allows for a grip where the wrist is almost perfectly in line with the thrust.
Olli Stenroos It is not a bad way to hold a blade since one get maximum reach with a straight arm but thumb on blade is better for upward thrusts ie. under ribs, belly or kidneys but then towards face and groin index finger on ought to be good. Thumb on blade is a stronger grip I think. Det e' fult att peka finger.
I found this channel thanks to Tod talking bollocks, There is something satisfying about the cock and ball jokes made possible by these things, I do believe the bollock daggers were primarily carried by less armoured people to show that they have more balls than armour.
Nothing - I mean nothing - is as entertaining as hearing Tod say, “cock and balls” repeatedly.
That actually makes sense.
Yep, we were right about Matt's house. Small gap between two bookshelves, ALSO packed with swords.
Great video. I was wondering about the long-handled flail in close rank combat, did it have a specialist use?
Hand to gland combat?
You know the longer you hold the dagger up, pointed at the camera, the more intimidated I become.
That rondel dagger is scary.
Something I would like to see investigated is the bauernwehr or "nailed" peasant knife.
The presence of the nail, to me, seems to suggest a combat application, but I am unaware of any source that actually talks about such a thing.
Could this be due to the typically low status of such a blade?
Did you polish the brass on your dirk? Mine came looking pretty rough with some pitted spots.
Love mah bollock dagger!
You’re right I would definitely be interested in seeing the story of the immediate predecessors of these knives, but going back a few centuries to the Saxon/Viking daggers/seaxes - what this video makes me wonder even more is “why did it take so long to put an upper guard/bolster on knives like this??”
I know the seax (and early Dark Age swords) were all about the hewing and slashing, but they must have stabbed with them sometimes? And surely must have encountered the issue of hands slipping up onto blades? I know - understandably - you disliked lots of the weaponry in The Last Kingdom, but the main character’s kinda-seax-thing has quillons, and although not historically accurate it does seem to make much more sense than having nothing to bolster your hand on your fighting knife. So what’s the deal?
Do you think you can do a video On Baselards
The evidence of the Mary Rose suggests that it’s likely that many, possibly even most men on the ship carried Ballock daggers, suggesting they would be utility knives or soldiers and sailors alike. Carrying both types of dagger would likely be an inconvenience. The Ballock dagger is a better multi-use knife, so why wouldn’t they be popular?
The point of bare handed fighting seems the most accurate to me the rondell would be uncomfortable bare handed but still a stronger penetrator. While the bollock far more maneuverable bare handed to either find gaps in between plate or mail although I'd think you could drive a strong bollock through mail or Gambeson .
The subtitles could not cope with bollock. My favourite attempt at it was bullet baguettes
In 500 years, some future Matt Easton will be seriously pondering the practical use of the Tac-Sac.
How thick is that bollock dagger over the back?
Does ebony handle increase dagger's gamage?
A question. Since when did people start to make full tang knives?
I'm going to assume Messer blades are full tang. Technically they are not swords. They are made like a knife. Lang Messer I think means Long Knife . Hence sword restrictions don't apply to them.
If this is the case then it's at least been since the 1300's.
I'd like to see more videos about other knife and dagger types apart from the ones you and Tod have already covered several times. In other words, what else is out there?
I love that there are just swords basically hidden in a corner by a bookshelf in this man's house.
My grandmother used to keep guns like that.
Can you review the Crazy 88 fight from Kill Bill?
Matt has statement on the order that for both styles of dagger that one can tell from the hilts that they were fighting daggers and not tools. I would have thought that obvious from the blades.
By the way...maybe I've missed it, but is there a video focused on spear points? It's always called the king of weapons and I'd love to hear a deep dive on their evolution.
The thing that immediately suggests itself to me about the bollock dagger is comfort while wearing it in a belt or thigh scabbard. A disc would be massively uncomfortable and potentially quite the source of injury if you fell on it. I really don't like to think about how awful a rondel dagger would be to wear as a routine side arm on a daily basis, especially while unarmoured. A bollock dagger seems, to me, to be a daily wearer whereas a rondel dagger might be something you'd get out of a cupboard if you were expecting to have to take on a battle in part or full armour. You don't walk around in full armour all the time, why would you? But a bollock dagger would be bloody useful to have on your person whenever you were wandering about just in case you got into a fight unexpected. You're also far less likely to clonk it into things while going about your day. Also, surely they're far more easily concealed under a cloak etc.
The point about gloved vs not gloved is definitely a good one but to me, most of the time with a dagger you're carrying it around just in case. Therefore there's always the compromise between utility in combat and them being a pain in the arse as you move around while not fighting. The bollock dagger doesn't snag on things like a cross guard and doesn't unnecessarily protrude sideways making you endlessly bash into stuff as you edge past it.
To me, the bollock dagger looks like a mighty fine example of such a compromise. It stops you slicing your own hand by sliding up the blade if you do have to stick it in another chap, which is harder than it looks, but isn't such a pain in the arse to wear that you're tempted to just lob it in a cupboard. I think I'd definitely want one if I were in such a time period where being constantly armed is preferable but you're also unlikely to be fighting at any given moment. However, if someone were attacking my house and I had time I'd head for the cupboard for the really serious kit.
Interesting thought, I wonder if bollock daggers developed from knockoff rondels. Obviously people would have made cheap copies of early rondels with the flared pommel, then someone cuts off the sides of the disk to make it more practical, then somebody carves channels down the center to make it more comfortable to use and lo and behold you have a crude bollock dagger.
Ballsack daggers.
Scrotal daggers.
Nutsack daggers.
Is there a version where one ball is lower than the other?
I think most people miss two things.
Aviabillity and deployability aka "oh sh.t" deployment in regards to backup&sidearms.
I wonder if they used shorter daggers at that time too. The roman pugio should have some sucessors if one thinks about it but seems to have been lost somewhere in the dark ages until pretty much north america was setteled. It would be easy to make a broken triangular bajonett or so into a "hideout"/boot/wherever weapon but i haven`t seen sources for this yet.
Is that gauntlet too small for you, or are your fingers supposed to stick out so far past it?
Listening to this on the headphones, making toast in the kitchen at 2 in the morning, crying laughing every time you say it. Dead.
How correct is it to have a bollock dagger with an ebony handle? Ebony is a tropical wood and I think would have been rather rare in Europe at this time.
I think the bollock’s bollocks evolved as a easy, cheap way to make a knife that provided protection for your hand sliding forward instead of making and fitting a guard. As a knife maker I can tell you making a knife with a guard adds expense and time to making a knife.
"Vestigial bollocks" made me spit coffee :-)
So basically Matt this is a video on how to most comfortably and practically grip bollocks?
I can’t be the only one who thinks bollock daggers are ugly
Ben engledow Matter of Individual taste, I guess.
Ben engledow
I'd agree the rondel is much prettier.
Like many things from the Medieval period, they look fucking stupid to my modern eyes. (Much like hose, codpieces, kettle helmets, and long toed shoes or sabatons.)
Bollock daggers are aesthetically pleasing. And I actually have doubts about it being phallic based personally.
@@chromarush1749 I don't. We know that medieval Europeans had a crude and bawdy sense of humour, and anybody that doesn't see the bollock dagger's unmistakable similarity to an erect phallus is just trying too hard to be a straight-laced Victorian lady.
The Geneva Convention, specifically bans tri-edge blades. I understand why, but what sword or most likely dagger was common enough that it makes an appearance in literally the rules of war?
The answer is bayonets. Every regular Soldier got one.
Of course not all bayonets were tri-edged, but they were pretty popular in some militaries.
Why did some have square blades and some have strait blades?
what came first the rondel as an armor piece or the rondel dagger, if tis the rondel armor (which i think came first) wouldent that alone be evidence that this is an armored persons sword, your taking a part of armor that is used to fill gaps with a dagger
Is there any certain way these were attached to a belt? Were they simply tied on with a half hitch knot? And if so how was the leather strap wrapped around the belt?
i think those cords are not entirely accurate they eere prpbably more complex in construction... for example real originals ive seen preserved in museums the cord is much stouter and mayny times the traw string in in the back of the sheath so youd slid it on your belt and draw it likea drawstring tight to your liking.. not just rudely tied like a shoelace
How type T, T2, U, all the Vs, and Z pommel forms effect the hand on two handed sword hilts.
Are those according to some dagger or hilt typology? Source, please!
Nevis Ysbryd
Oakeshott’s “the sword in the age of chivalry”
@@Eulemunin Oh, he typified hilts as well? Huh.
I don't think I've ever heard the word 'bollock' so much! I've heard it more in this video than the rest of my life combined! 😅
why no crossguards or other significant hand protection?
other daggers of the 1500s had that.
Convenience and necessity. The longer the guard, the more awkward it makes daily carry (mind, they did get longer with parrying daggers) . Probably increased the cost, too, due to additional material and work.
And you are not going to rely on the quillons of daggers nearly as much as compared to a sword (you are going to catch offending blades a lot less with the shorter dagger blade than with longer sword blades) unless you are specifically using it in that way (parrying dagger, and even they had shorter quillion versions) in the first place, especially considering that you have to come in a lot closer with daggers and thus it is going to cover a much smaller field of potential attacks already.
...I see that you have a collection of Osprey books on the shelf behind you...
Why is that glass/crystal decanter behind you empty?
Thirsty afternoon..
What brand is your Scottish Dirk?
They are all from Tod Cutler / Tod's Workshop
@@scholagladiatoria wow, that doesn't look like a 15" blade in your hand as the measurements on his page say. Ive had my eye on that for awhile. Thanks for all the great videos, keep up the good work and thank you for the response.
I would like a vid about the basalard ( not sure the spelling)
There are a couple of different spellings for that type of blade I've also seen it spelled basilard
Don’t you think that what one carried also , as for military, was determined by the crafter of the crown not to mention the speed they could be turned out.
Matt, do you think painters and other artists drawing these scenes and characters could have been misinformed, like modern artists are today in relation to military equipment?
medieval people were far more intune with violence and warefare than modern people are.. their depicitions are fare more accurate than what ours are today.. everything they drew had significance for them... unlike now... you must think ALL people in that time carried arms.. even women and children carred knives and daggers.. many art shows regular people armed at meals.. in taverns.. at markets or working in the feilds... not just witha dagger by more substantial arms.. this can be considered when you look that medoeval cities like oxford or london had murder rates of 100-200 per 100000...... that os murders from disagreements, fights, ect not duels or war.. .. which is insane.... people did an exceptionally large amount of murder in that time... wjen you see the muslim middle east for example most people go without arms in public or at best a small dagger in art of the time.. europe in that period was considered a particulary dangerious place to travel.. medieval europeans- not active soliders... are depicted even in art in light body armor in casuial public settings, carrying bucklers, swords ect... rural areas were probably even more violent, unlike for example the near east disputes could be resolved by combatting the person you conflicted with and jusk killing them without great consequences.. or none at all... blood money, feuds, fleeing to other towns or obtaining sanctuary could also be used.. average life was ignorant and violent.. we view the middle ages from the writings of monks.. external observers... but most europeans in northern and central europe continued to follow their traditional- mostly germanic tribal customs but in an increasingly complex society.. causing constant conflicts.. depictions of arms being carried and used were probably one thing those observersg monks... got very accurate