The $16 BILLION Plan to Rebuild a Failing Northeast Corridor | The Gateway Program

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 พ.ย. 2024
  • The Northeast Corridor is the most used rail line in the United States. But one of its most crucial components, an 11 mile stretch between Newark, NJ and New York City, is quickly falling victim to time. To combat this, Amtrak has began the construction of a $16 billion plan to revive the most crucial stretch of a failing Northeast Corridor - which includes 3 new bridges, 1 new rail line and 2 new tunnels bored under the Hudson River.
    #trains #train #northeast #eastcoast #northeastcorridor #railway #rail #rails #njtransit #njt #newjerseytransit #amtrak #subway #nyc #atlantic #newjersey #nj #pennstation #newyorkpennstation #newyorkcity #bigapple #nyp #lirr #longislandrailroad #moynihan #nec #gatewayprogram
    trains, new york city, new york penn station, long island rail road, amtrak, new jersey transit, nj transit, nj, njt, lirr, gateway project, northeast corridor

ความคิดเห็น • 377

  • @DTransit
    @DTransit  ปีที่แล้ว +43

    Hi everyone, thank you for watching! I really appreciate the support.
    I'm just now realizing that the animated map is not correct; the NEC actually goes through Providence, RI then north to Boston instead of cutting diagonally across CT and MA. Took me wayyyy too long to realize this, and I apologize for it. I hope you all enjoyed the video, though!
    Edit: Unfortunately some of my video was claimed due to copyrighted music towards the end, so there's a bit of a cut at the 7ish minute mark. I really apologize for this but it was really the only solution other than reuploading 😔

    •  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It looks like that map shows the most common highway route between New York and Boston: heading northward from New Haven to Hartford, then northeast to Sturbridge and on to Boston from there. (In highway terms, I-95 to New Haven, I-91 to Hartford, I-84 to Sturbridge, and I-90 to Boston.)
      The Northeast Corridor route stays along the coast longer, continuing to New London, then heads up to Providence via Westerly and Kingston. It stays close to the path of I-95 until reaching route 128, a ring road outside of Boston, then follows the path that the never-built Southwest Expressway would have taken through Dedham, Roslindale, and Jamaica Plain.
      Amtrak has service to Hartford, staying close to the path of I-91, but nothing going toward Sturbridge. Amtrak does have trains that continue to Springfield MA (still paralleling the path of I-91), where it would be possible to connect to the once-per-day Lake Shore Limited to get to Boston. That would be a much slower trip than staying on the NEC is.

    • @jackeppington6488
      @jackeppington6488 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @ True, but service does exist from Boston to Hartford to New Haven, and to NYC. I think Amtrak is exploring expansion of this route between NY and Boston to augment the traditional New Londown/Providence route. (Massachusetts also wanted to expand service to Springfield, with help from Amtrak, but funding for that apparently got shot down recently.)

    • @ikmarchini
      @ikmarchini ปีที่แล้ว

      Reseach the local place names, svp. Kearny is carny. Passaic is puh-SAKE.

    • @triandfit1
      @triandfit1 ปีที่แล้ว

      You started to talk about Penn Station, then it cuts to the end.

    • @mikeymutual5489
      @mikeymutual5489 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ikmarchini *Passaic is puh-SAY-ic.

  • @pjk9225
    @pjk9225 ปีที่แล้ว +84

    The best time to maintain and upgrade rail infrastructure was 20 years ago, but the second best time is right now! It's nice to see these solutions start to take shape!

    • @benjaminlamey3591
      @benjaminlamey3591 ปีที่แล้ว

      well, 50 years ago would have been a good time too ???

    • @AMPProf
      @AMPProf ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nahhh kill it Sue the hell outta csx and build Real hsr

    • @scottmaasmedia
      @scottmaasmedia 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Latest Portal North Bridge progress. th-cam.com/play/PLaV8A1t9NASlV791AHlcf7l-FFGMimKWQ.html

  • @herbertrodriquez6456
    @herbertrodriquez6456 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    New York and New Jersey are one storm away from an economic disaster if the current tunnels are damaged in any significant way.

    • @TheJaiNetwork
      @TheJaiNetwork 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No they aren’t.. ppl will just take buses or drive or take a ferry. There’s always bridges. This happened during 9-11 when the tunnels were closed. I still commuted to NyC by bus. Now if bridges and tunnels close that will be problematic

    • @stanman260
      @stanman260 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheJaiNetwork Buses and ferries have a fraction of the capacity of rail. Just because you were able to get in, doesn't mean many people will take that choice. Buses and ferries are slower too. It's a hassle. Much less people would come, prices of goods and services would rise, etc. It's a terrible feedback loop.

  • @BigMeechEJ25
    @BigMeechEJ25 ปีที่แล้ว +233

    As a North Jersey resident, Chris Christie gets under my nerves. I remember this talk about the project and his vocal disapproval of it, mostly because of costs that you mentioned. Meanwhile this guy is closing down lanes and creating a scandal on the GWB and spent close to $100k of tax payer money on concessions at giants games during his time as governor. Unreal. The country needs to reinvest in the rail system, we are way behind.

    • @joelweisstuch4572
      @joelweisstuch4572 ปีที่แล้ว

      He’s a clown

    • @spuds6423
      @spuds6423 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I am no fan of Christie but he did have a valid concern over the amount of funding and who would be paying for it initially over the THE (trans Hudson express) which would wind up deep under Macy's basement at 34th Street without any pass through connections. Later the ARC was completely in flux of what it would eventually be designed as , plus an overall funding scheme. Both DJT and Christie agreed that a project was necessary but as the content creator mentioned, these are not small feats or easy to fund, especially when they are a " moving target". Even with the best of intentions, trying to construct such a project is going to depend on some creative engineering, deal with a rats nest of various utilities and politics plus existing and future environmental regulations like the National Environmental Policy Act or NEPA.

    • @brentduanefoster
      @brentduanefoster ปีที่แล้ว +31

      The thing that kills me about Conservatives is that they always complain about costs, but what do they actually invest in that benefit their constituents? Answer: NOTHING!!!!

    • @realitybreath4647
      @realitybreath4647 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      You mean to tell me that a conservative would try and stifle something that would be good for the general population? Wow, I’ve never heard of that before.

    • @benqurayza7872
      @benqurayza7872 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      When evaluating a potential project, one must also quantity the (discounted present value of) potential future benefits. That is Finance 101. Republicans conveniently ignore the benefits when they say NO.

  • @davidjackson7281
    @davidjackson7281 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    Being on the west coast this video was extremely helpful with understanding the Gateway Project. Very well done. Thank you.

    • @ItsYaBoiiiDB
      @ItsYaBoiiiDB ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Me in east coast really cool here

  • @stephentalas1940
    @stephentalas1940 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    As a Brit on a first ever visit to the States, we rode Amtrak from NYC Penn to Union DC and back a few weeks ago, we were surprised as to how poor the ride was in places, not as if we don't have our issues here in the UK, but we were left underwhelmed in general as to how infrastaructure in the States currently stands, I appreciate the argument over green issues is a heated one, and the divorce between America and the V8 engine looks like it could be a long and a very painful one, but you have a beautiful country that if it fell in love with the train again and public transport, would benefit enormously all round. Really hope these plans come together. We found Penn Station a bit of a maze to navigate especially on the return leg, that place really does need a rethink..

    • @RepublicanJesusthe2nd
      @RepublicanJesusthe2nd ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes NYP is fucked.

    • @kjrehberg
      @kjrehberg ปีที่แล้ว

      What's interesting is how smooth the ride is on the faster Acela compared to the slower Northeast Regionals. I think the new Airo trainsets will make the ride even better, though I think the proposed battery-electric units are far too ambitious and will not be very successful..

    • @TheRailwayDrone
      @TheRailwayDrone ปีที่แล้ว

      Best comment on this video so far.

  • @captainkeyboard1007
    @captainkeyboard1007 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    The Gateway Construction Program is scores long overdue as the railroad is too old to exist, and the present tunnels need thorough renovation. That railroad is badly worn out. This presentation has been great.

  • @RushOrbit
    @RushOrbit ปีที่แล้ว +77

    Would be FANTASTIC to get the 7 train out to NJ stopping at Hoboken, Union City, and Secaucus as part of this project.

    • @langstonreese7077
      @langstonreese7077 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Kinda defeats the purpose of the NYC subway. It’s called the NYC subway for a reason.

    • @Dragblacker
      @Dragblacker ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Better to just extend the 7 to its logical end point at 14 St, and extend the L to 10th Av, so the two can connect.

    • @Dragblacker
      @Dragblacker ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@langstonreese7077 Besides, there already is a NY-NJ subway: PATH.

    • @RushOrbit
      @RushOrbit ปีที่แล้ว +34

      @@langstonreese7077 No, the 7 train making 3 stops outside of the city does not invalidate the existence of all 36 lines and 427 stops of the subway.

    • @kennykenkak
      @kennykenkak ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@langstonreese7077TIL that the “purpose” of the NYC Subway is that it stays entirely in NYC and not, you know moving people around

  • @daveharrison84
    @daveharrison84 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Think of how much more it will cost now, than if they had started building the tunnel in 2010

    • @rupe53
      @rupe53 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      how much different could it be... adjusted for inflation. It's not like they are using different plans or materials, right? OTOH, it might be done already.

    • @kevinnieto8331
      @kevinnieto8331 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@rupe53it’s significantly more now, the same way the cost of home was a lot cheaper to build in 2010 than it is today, your still building the same exact thing but now wages and labor demand more money and material costs are now much higher! And constructing anything in the city with unions involved is gonna drive the price higher. Ex: average home build was about 130k in 2010 ….. Now I’m 2023 average price is 270k and this is for an average 1,600 sqft home 🤷‍♂️ you always pay more when you wait for the damage to pile up

    • @rupe53
      @rupe53 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kevinnieto8331 those were all valid points... but the same points were valid 10, 20, even 50 years ago, when they should have built it bigger in the first place. In the meanwhile, your pay went up too, so the costs are all relative to inflation, the same as always. Pay me now or pay me later, right? The only thing that has changed is a greater need over time.

    • @TheLordAI
      @TheLordAI 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If Trump were still in office they still wouldn't have even. Broken ground on this project. And if Republicans win a majority I wouldn't be surprised if they cut its funding if not dead it all together

    • @tylortaylor6124
      @tylortaylor6124 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Labor inflation is phuckin crazy 🤌🏾😳😩

  • @Hakuna65Matata
    @Hakuna65Matata ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I wish the Lehigh Valley got a Amtrak Station so people can go to and From New York or Philadelphia. Great way to eliminate the congestion on the 476 blue route section near I95

    • @joecesa
      @joecesa ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I heard there's talk to do so, reusing some abandond right-of-way from Penn Central between Binghamton, NY, Scranton-WB, and (i forgot where in)NNJ, which could connect people into NYC. Besides the investment in the rebuild, having people using, shopping, working, visiting between all of the possible connections is a huge investment in this poor terribly neglected area. Car-culture screams about a bike lane taking something from "them", and refuse to see the whole benefit of less congestion, and more people employed and connections.

    • @johngrubb6415
      @johngrubb6415 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@joecesa It's called the Lackawanna Cutoff project, and it's been slowly moving for many years. It won't help the Lehigh Valley which I picture as the Bethlehem/Allentown/Easton area, but it will be huge for northern NJ and points west.

  • @russellmancillas4464
    @russellmancillas4464 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Lets get it done!

    • @htimsid
      @htimsid ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Isn't it astonishing how l o n g it takes to get these essential projects started?!

  • @mariusdufour9186
    @mariusdufour9186 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    There's a business case for spending a cool 200bn dollars, if not more, (as much as necessary to get it done really), on getting an entirely new new high speed line built linking all the major city centres on the north-east corridor. This would not only have Acela beat flying from city centre to city centre, but more importantly, it will free up lots of capacity on the existing corridor for regional and local services which can increase in both frequency. and reliability. The demand is obviously there, you have the densest urban cores in the US, some excellent local and regional transit ferrying people to and from those city centres and thus the HSR station, and an absolutely massive population and gdp.

    • @dmac6004
      @dmac6004 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      200 bil would be a bargin, Amtrak estimates that a new line from Boston via the hartford area and then somehow to nYP is 150 bil it will cost a lot more to plow through NJ and Phillie area.

    • @Geotpf
      @Geotpf ปีที่แล้ว

      Considering all the property acquisition costs (and lawsuits) to build a new high speed network from scratch, I think the cost would be north of one trillion dollars, probably more. Look at the high costs that California is having on their high speed train line, but more so, since the Northeast Corridor is longer and much denser, with much more expensive land.

  • @MMuraseofSandvich
    @MMuraseofSandvich ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This is going to be a lot more massive and costly than the renovation of Shibuya station in Tokyo, which happened under similar circumstances. Shibuya is one of two entry points into the heart of the metropolis from neighboring Kanagawa prefecture (the other is Shinagawa), and there are like 6 or so lines going in, including the JR Yamanote loop and several Tokyo Metro subway routes. On top of it all is a multi-story department store.
    If New York wants a resilient mass transit service that can survive the coming difficulties from climate change and sea level rise, they're going to have to be like a combination of Tokyo and Amsterdam. And something tells me they're up to the challenge.

  • @brmnyc
    @brmnyc ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Very informative; never knew about the plans to update the other bridges between the Portal Bridge and Newark.

  • @mikeef747
    @mikeef747 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The tunnel is over capacity, but is not failing or a failure by any means, in fact, it might hold the world record for total passengers commuted through a tunnel by train the history of the world. An engineering marvel at it's time of construction, no one in 1910 would've ever believed it would still be operating 123 years later without any major operational incidents!

    • @MildChunkySalsa
      @MildChunkySalsa ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It does need upgrades so that travels can continue using for longer. It will be great for the city

    • @mikeef747
      @mikeef747 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MildChunkySalsa I agree with you, they need another tunnel and one that can handle much higher speeds. I was just saying the tunnel has been a great success when considering what it was its intended purpose in 1910.
      It's the port authority and governments of NJ/NY/US that are a failure to have taken so long when a new tunnel should've been built as far back as the 60's & 70's.

  • @damnimloomin
    @damnimloomin ปีที่แล้ว +28

    You forgot one of the most important things Metro north railroad would be able to operate their own rolling stock (which they currently pay NJT to drive their own trains which are WAY nicer lol) and would most likely invest in the port Jarvis line, i think the MTA needs to build another bridge or tunnel across the Hudson and allow service from Penn or GCT and there would also be a back up if the tunnel has to be closed

    • @spuds6423
      @spuds6423 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Where would this crossing be? Too bad they turned the old Poughkeepsie Bridge into a pedestrian bridge/park and the TZB2 was not designed for carrying heavy rail like it was originally designed to back in the early 2000's.

    • @spuds6423
      @spuds6423 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The GWB lower deck was designed to carry rail but that never happened either. Any other locations would be subject to the National Environmental Policy Act or NEPA and that takes a long, long time.

    • @Jay-nk6dm
      @Jay-nk6dm ปีที่แล้ว

      which trains are nicer? the metro north rolling stock or the NJT?

    • @tomoconnell2320
      @tomoconnell2320 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why would Metro north spend billions on a tunnel when half their network isn’t even electrified, and their current network is split between 2 completely different power supply systems? This would be a criminal waste of money

    • @harrisonc985
      @harrisonc985 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@spuds6423lol at this point it might be cheaper to invest in extradimensional teleportation technology

  • @MildChunkySalsa
    @MildChunkySalsa ปีที่แล้ว +3

    A recent development is the 5 year extension of Madison Square Garden’s operating permit. Some say this is so the City and MSG group can come to an agreement on loving the arena somewhere else. This would be an important step towards the renovation of Penn Station in the future.

  • @flopsiejmcardle
    @flopsiejmcardle ปีที่แล้ว +5

    PUH-SAY-IC The Northeast Corridor basically pays for the rest of the country's rail system. It's unconscionable to let it decay to this state.

  • @TheRailwayDrone
    @TheRailwayDrone ปีที่แล้ว

    My favorite part of this video is the phrase "construction started..." at 5:01. We all know how hard it is to get the government to build rail projects in this country so it is refreshing to know things are finally happening here.

  • @princessofthecape2078
    @princessofthecape2078 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    0:39 That map is totally wrong. The trains in New England run along the Connecticut seacoast and up through Rhode Island to reach Boston.

    • @spuds6423
      @spuds6423 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I noticed that too. I saw another channel use the same animation. Politically connected consultants tend not to be most keyed in to the important details of a project and rely on equally clueless politicians for verification. I worked in the public transportation industry for over 30 years. There were some real doozies out there.

    • @gerbs139
      @gerbs139 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I wish that the map was correct as then there might be decent rail service between central Mass (Worcester) and NYC.

    • @FadkinsDiet
      @FadkinsDiet ปีที่แล้ว

      There have been proposals to move the nec away from the coast in ct to limit its vulnerability to storms and flooding. None in the pipeline though.

    • @spuds6423
      @spuds6423 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FadkinsDiet where would it diverge?? The takings necessary for any high speed curvatures would be not only expensive but run into opposition by environmentalists

  • @gurumyster
    @gurumyster หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m so excited for this new project and can’t wait to see it completed 👍

  • @th3thrilld3m0n
    @th3thrilld3m0n ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Good god this was conceived in 95 and still hasn't been done? The more I watch this country's infrastructure projects fail due to stupidity, the more I want to move to Japan. If they have a project, it'll be done quick. Road construction? Overnight.

    • @jasonreed7522
      @jasonreed7522 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      The only physics reason to not build something as fast as your logistics can support is the need to let sediment settle before you build ontop of if.
      Otherwise most of the slowdown is from political/bureaucratic stuff. I understand environmental impact statements, but delaying a project that has to get built eventually for budget reasons has only ever made it more expensive in the long run. (Inflation & general increase in cost of materials/labor as time goes on)

    • @stevieme8642
      @stevieme8642 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Biden has been the best on this in my lifetime. I'm glad our president is a train guy.

    • @FELiPES101
      @FELiPES101 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@stevieme8642 lol he isn't a train guy he is just doing whatever his keepers tell him to do...he doesn't think for himself

    • @stevieme8642
      @stevieme8642 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FELiPES101 you're so full of crap that I don't know how you can look in the mirror!

    • @stevieme8642
      @stevieme8642 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FELiPES101 you're so full of crap that I don't know how you can look in the mirror!

  • @rollinwithunclepete824
    @rollinwithunclepete824 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent video. Very informative. Just subscribed cuz I want more of videos like this one.

  • @kjrehberg
    @kjrehberg ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for a great video!
    One note, at 07:42 there is an accidental edit.

  • @mrrockdaddy100
    @mrrockdaddy100 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In that I live in the city of Newark I'm happy that you mentioned the city of North and Northeast corridor and how important it is I'm looking forward to this being built and improved thanks for mentioning thanks for mentioning Newark because most videos don't

    • @DTransit
      @DTransit  ปีที่แล้ว +6

      No problem! Newark is a very very influential city for New Jersey especially when it comes to transport. I'm thinking of doing two more videos relating to Newark: the Newark Light Rail/subway system and the Newark Penn redevelopment plans. Any other ideas?

    • @jpg3702
      @jpg3702 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree. Perhaps a video on broad Street Station too? Also a video on path?

  • @fredpagniello3267
    @fredpagniello3267 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Well, they could always guve MSG their walking papers to rebuild the original Penn Station. That would be ironic, as the original station was demolished for MSG. What's a demolition between friends, anyway?

  • @mistypiker466
    @mistypiker466 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You should take a look at the South Shore Line in Indiana. They’ve been working on double tracking and upgrading all of the stations for the last couple of years. It’s gonna be really awesome when it’s done but for now it means to take the train a certain point and then you have to get on the transfer bus for the portion there currently working on and then you get back on the train to go to Chicago.

  • @davidstone408
    @davidstone408 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Seems this is going in the right direction, with all large infrastructure projects cost is always a concern as is protecting the existing services during construction. We need more rail based services, doesn’t matter if in the US, Canada, UK, France - all have projects currently in progress.

  • @johnjezek7617
    @johnjezek7617 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What's crazy is the list of all the possible funding sources mentioned in the video. State, city, federal government, transit operators, private sources, etc. I think when the Pennsylvania RR built the tunnels over a century ago, they did it all themselves with no outside funding. I think it was pretty much done on schedule as well. Add to that no computers, cell phones and other modern technologies. Yet today it takes decades if it even happens at all. Have we progressed?

  • @89volvowithlazers
    @89volvowithlazers ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this is a decades plus long effort and should employ tons of folks steady with some going into retirement at the end of the project and others, being the beneficiary of the effort ,t become managers and directors on other huge projects. This along with other infrastructure efforts will support a steady stream of engineers, architects. operators and give them once in a career experiences that with some humbleness could set the US up for a 20 plus year run of infrastructure improvements across power, transportation, waste water, flood prevention, water retention, housing, roadway design and more with some experienced knowledgeable & humble work force that will be getting paid. Ya gotta love this story for a decade plus of benefits.

  • @tobyhilden
    @tobyhilden ปีที่แล้ว

    This is really good. Thank you. You made me subscribe. Keep up the good work

  • @Jay-nk6dm
    @Jay-nk6dm ปีที่แล้ว +3

    would the new infrastructure be capable of handling higher speed trains if acela is upgraded?

    • @joecesa
      @joecesa ปีที่แล้ว +1

      From the things I've read over the last 20 years, yes. A little. With little to no bottleneck getting trains in and out of NYC, better track, straightened track to allow higher speeds in this immediate area. The biggest gains in speed will be in the ultimate reconstruction of more of the line, that has been severely neglected since the 1950's.

  • @SenseZ9on
    @SenseZ9on ปีที่แล้ว +1

    GREAT video

  • @DigitalIslandboy
    @DigitalIslandboy ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You forgot Providence, Rhode Island.

  • @OgaugeTrainsplusslotCars
    @OgaugeTrainsplusslotCars ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Let’s start Building

  • @alexaznavour3033
    @alexaznavour3033 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Where do you find all of this B-roll, great quality!

    • @DTransit
      @DTransit  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you! Actually a lot of the B-roll is either media footage or footage from the Gateway Program. Only exception was the footage at the start, that was from various TH-cam video compilations 👍👍

    • @mattk9644
      @mattk9644 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DTransitfor future videos you’re more than welcome to take some of my videos to use in yours.

  • @MiguelSanchez-bu7hd
    @MiguelSanchez-bu7hd ปีที่แล้ว

    I like how the animation of the Portal North Bridge still has the current Acela train sets running on it in 2028. Given the rollout of the Avelia Liberty that feels about right.

  • @zacheslick
    @zacheslick ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Um…. Your first map indicates that the train goes up through Hartford into the right hand corner and into Boston. I’m not sure if you’re aware of this, but that is not how Amtrak works. It goes all the way through Rhode Island and up to Boston just so you know.

    • @DTransit
      @DTransit  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes I realized just a couple days ago unfortunately... Bit embarrassing on my side 🙈🙈 sorry about that! I think I also left a comment explaining that error.

  • @xsailor85
    @xsailor85 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Southwest Chief needs upgrades too.

  • @BigBlueMan118
    @BigBlueMan118 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As an Aussie rail fan looking at the NEC I simply just cannot get my head around why the NEC ends less than 2miles short of connecting with all the northern Boston commuter rail lines plus the busy Downeaster line which connects to Brunswick, Rochester, Portsmouth; and the lack of connection between Boston South and Boston North station means you have to change subway line twice and overloads these subway services, plus you can't through-run any of the commuter trains. All you would have to do is a really short 2mile long tunnel and a bit of electrification and it would open up the whole city for more frequent faster trips.

    • @word42069
      @word42069 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      To be fair it sees very little travel in that portion. Besides the moderate and short commuter rail of north boston metro area… the NEC see’s essentially no use from Boston Northward. NEC’s bread and butter is DC>PHI>Newark>NYC>Boston.

  • @nolantherailfan5048
    @nolantherailfan5048 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I feel uneasy traveling through those tunnels because of there condition

    • @mattk9644
      @mattk9644 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It’s really not that bad. It’s pretty safe and was well built. For how old it is, and the fact that it’s still holding up to this day in age really tells you how good it was built. From the 1910s to 2023-

    • @stevenroshni1228
      @stevenroshni1228 ปีที่แล้ว

      The US and even more so New York has a fairly high standards to make sure the tunnels are only open if there is full confidence that the train will make it to the other side

  • @johnnytoobad7785
    @johnnytoobad7785 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yup..All those underground tunnels built in the early 1900's are starting to crack & peel...

  • @jre617
    @jre617 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really believe the entire NEC should have an all-new high-speed rail (HSR) system. Separate right-of-way on the existing route, in place of two of the existing tracks or above it where possible. This is the only route in America that could truly benefit from the high cost of such a project. California's HSR project is a massive waste of money and will never be finished. Most developed countries, plus China and others, have HSR, but not the US. The NEC is the route for it.

  • @af8312
    @af8312 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    the Northeast's tunnels need to be very heavily rennovated or replaced overall, Metro-North suffers from an issue with trains being too long for a large amount of their platforms, this prevents seeing the bike-car style commuter trains that ya see in places like LA and San Francisco. An upgraded set of tunnels in the northeast, not just along the NEC, but also along the Harlem and Empire Corridor would allow double decker trains. The has the advantage of allowing the same length of trains, with nearly double the passenger seating capacity, and allow them to add proper bike cars without cutting passenger capacity.

    • @adriandunne4382
      @adriandunne4382 ปีที่แล้ว

      The climates of California and NY/NJ are very different especially in winter and bikes are simply not an option in the North East in winter.

    • @af8312
      @af8312 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@adriandunne4382 Don't tell me that I attend university in a suburb of NYC and I bike in the winter. regardless, 3/4 of the year it's bikeable for more "normal" people I guess, and they'd still benefit from dedicated bike cars, even if you only run them on trainsets half the year.

  • @jeffreyhare5695
    @jeffreyhare5695 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    then NJ Governor Christie nixed the idea of a new tunnel. Been through those old tunnels before and didn't realize it was that bad. tRumpass also would not fund it either, so now it will cost even way more. Though not feasible wish they could have an over the river bridge for trains, that view would be priceless.

    • @mattk9644
      @mattk9644 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That’s even more money to make a bridge over the river plus the ships that go through it. It would be a cool view though. Not saying it can’t happen but it’ll have to go back underground anyway for NYC Penn Station. Just a lot of headaches trying to build around and in NY. Yk

    • @counterfit5
      @counterfit5 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@mattk9644that would be a steep climb, to get from whatever the depth is for Penn Station to ~213ft to match the clearance of the GeoWashBridge in 0.6mi. That would be tough for a truck, nevermind a train

    • @mattk9644
      @mattk9644 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@counterfit5 exactly it’s just pretty much impossible the best bet are the Hudson Tunnels.

    • @stevenroshni1228
      @stevenroshni1228 ปีที่แล้ว

      Everybody knew Christie made the wrong decision, but Superstorm Sandy forced the plan back on the table.
      Mayor Bloomberg wanted to extend the subway to New Jersey but that idea fell off after the NYC Olympics bid fell apart.

    • @spuds6423
      @spuds6423 ปีที่แล้ว

      Don't blame DJT, the project morphed at least 3 times before the eventual Gateway Project was decided upon. This has been in the works long before 2017 and the exact funding was and what new environmental regulations would apply. Everyone agreed that something had to be done, the question was how much and who is on the hook to pay it.

  • @boatlover1875
    @boatlover1875 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Baltimore tunnel is also a major issue.

    • @Needham18
      @Needham18 ปีที่แล้ว

      They just awarded the contracts to rehabilitate it!

  • @terrygelinas4593
    @terrygelinas4593 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A new tunnel is needed into Penn Station from New Jersey.

  • @drewrobinson5153
    @drewrobinson5153 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I believe that NJ Transit Line you mention at 5:51 is pronounced PASS-kack, not "pass-SACK". it is named for the Pascack Brook which runs through the general area served by the Pascack Valley Line (former New Jersey & New York RR, which was a subsidiary of the Erie RR). Thanks for your video - let's hope SOME of this gets built before the next "superstorm" finishes off New York's aging rail tunnels for good!

    • @word42069
      @word42069 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I thought he meant Passaic which is native American and pronounced “pe-SAY-ik”.

  • @tmurphy722
    @tmurphy722 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It will cost 3 times as estimated and take twice as long and only is all goes "well".....

    • @word42069
      @word42069 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      probably, by not starting the world will not make it any cheaper as we’ve seen.

  • @azpro2957
    @azpro2957 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    $16 Billion is what bush and Cheney wasted in Iraq every 45 days (The US was in Iraq for 8 1/2 years, total cost approximately $2.2 Trillion). Think of how many US repairs we could have achieved with that money?

    • @texaswunderkind
      @texaswunderkind ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly. That pointless war weakened the United States in every measurable way.

  • @trainrover
    @trainrover ปีที่แล้ว +1

    that segment @ 2:43 strikes me as the best recording of trainspotting ever --- shame about that compulsion at blighting it with cleptoparasitically corporate slides though...

    • @B3Band
      @B3Band ปีที่แล้ว

      This isn't a trainspotting video. Cry about it.

    • @trainrover
      @trainrover ปีที่แล้ว

      oo la --- customarily mistaking emotiveness compels that one into...dismissing some dronesome productionist's cloud cuckoo-land...

  • @bosskxx1
    @bosskxx1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The maps you use are wrong, It seems like it goes through Hartford when it travels along 95 through Rhode Island and up to Boston.

    • @thomasschlegel7811
      @thomasschlegel7811 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Hartford routing reflects Amtrak’s long term plan to move the NY-Boston corridor to a faster (less curve burdened) route away from the shore line.

    • @bosskxx1
      @bosskxx1 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thomasschlegel7811 OK, but still not the NEC though.

  • @collagen1738
    @collagen1738 ปีที่แล้ว

    omg!!! new jersey mentioned!!!

  • @bbbb6066
    @bbbb6066 ปีที่แล้ว

    The US deficit this year is 1.5 trillion dollars. Our total national debt is 32 trillion dollars plus. It cost 476 billion dollars to service our debt a year. We will spend 1.5 trillion dollars a year more than we take in for the forcible future. In the years ahead we could be spending almost a trillion dollars a year on the interest on the money we barrowed. If the projections are 16 billion dollars to complete the project then that is it. No cost over runs that double or triple the cost of the project. At some point we need to control our cost. In the time that it take to complete this project our national debt could be close to 40 trillion dollars and getting close to 1 trillion dollars to service our debt. I use to live on LI and know how important this project is but cost control is also important. Thank you Ben

    • @friedzombie4
      @friedzombie4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The deficit is just a pie in the sky number. The US should only worry when the IMF and other global financial institutions decouple from the US dollar and despite BRICS the Yuan isn't there quite yet.
      I guess we'll see how that pans out once the Taiwan question is settled.

  • @WaltANelsonPHD
    @WaltANelsonPHD ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Funding, construction and legal issues will likely mean it will take 40 years to complete this project.

    • @texaswunderkind
      @texaswunderkind ปีที่แล้ว

      Somewhat justified. Do you know why projects happen so fast in China? 1) Because they don't care who loses their home, 2) they don't care who gets killed during construction, 3) they don't care what pollutes the air, water, and soil, and 4) they don't care that it starts falling apart a year after completion.

    • @biggseye
      @biggseye ปีที่แล้ว

      More likely 60, and they will want the rest of the country to pay for it. they can go f themselves.

    • @michaelkeudel8770
      @michaelkeudel8770 ปีที่แล้ว

      not with the infrastructure deal Biden passed, this project is prime to get some of those funds, the moneys there.

    • @rupe53
      @rupe53 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      if they started tomorrow and cost was not the issue, I doubt it would be done in 10 - 12 years.

    • @michaelkeudel8770
      @michaelkeudel8770 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rupe53 not without also building the supply chain needed for that massive of a project, the jobs that alone will create is what keeps us growing and out of recession.

  • @mfee2079
    @mfee2079 ปีที่แล้ว

    My father was Station Master of Penn Station in Newark until he retired in 96. I remember him having to stay at work for hours after his shift because that damn bridge outside the station heading into ny was stuck causing insane delays on the NE Corridor.
    Ny and nj residents pay insane taxes but cant fix infrastructure? Maybe you all should find out why your taxes are not being used correctly

  • @muddynmonte
    @muddynmonte ปีที่แล้ว

    Damn, that would have been a good project to start in 2020

  • @electro_sykes
    @electro_sykes ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Northeast Corridor is fine. Its better then what the Western and Southern states get.

    • @WhyDidIJustEatThat
      @WhyDidIJustEatThat ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Could be better though.

    • @maroon9273
      @maroon9273 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Need to be renovated before a disaster happens.

    • @texaswunderkind
      @texaswunderkind ปีที่แล้ว

      It's legal to shoot someone for mentioning a train in Texas.

  • @dirtjumppigeon2941
    @dirtjumppigeon2941 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Let’s go prudential center

  • @rioquibu
    @rioquibu ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Miami Florida built Amtrak a brand new beautiful train depot at Miami. International airport is called “Miami Intermodal Center “ the station connects to Miami metro train, tri-rail commuter train, Miami sky train to the airport lobby, greyhound bus station and all the car rental companies.
    Yet, Amtrak has NOT moved in for seven 7 years they have come up with excuses and demands while staying at the old ugly station 2 miles north of Miami international airport inside an old ugly industrial area.

  • @SR-bh5jd
    @SR-bh5jd ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Concerned about cost overruns? Cost overruns for a government project are guaranteed. Initial cost times 2 1/2 would be realistic.

    • @texaswunderkind
      @texaswunderkind ปีที่แล้ว

      Not really. Fixed-price contracts are possible. The problem is that the contractors would have to reveal the true cost of the project up front. Taxpayers would rather have a $500 million project go over budget by $2 Billion and bitch about it than see a $2 Billion price tag up front.

  • @SirKenchalot
    @SirKenchalot ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Doesn't PATH have its own tunnels under the Hudson meaning there are 2 routes from NJ to lower/mid Manhattan?

    • @DTransit
      @DTransit  ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yes they do. I didn't word it very well; I meant that the Northeast Corridor is really the only rail line with further access to points north, as well an ability to sustain a large volume of trains. Sorry about that.

    • @davidfrischknecht8261
      @davidfrischknecht8261 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      PATH actually has two sets of tunnels under the river. One set basically leads right to the World Trade Center, and the other set is further north, leading to Christopher Street.

    • @de-fault_de-fault
      @de-fault_de-fault ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If you're counting PATH then there's three pairs of tunnels (the North River tunnels on the NEC, the uptown PATH tubes, and the downtown PATH tubes). But PATH is already operating at capacity in terms of passengers, and even if it were possible for mainline trains to use those tiny tubes, they don't physically connect to anything on the New York side.

    • @stevenroshni1228
      @stevenroshni1228 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes, but that's separate from the NEC, only compatible with their trains and no east of Penn Station neighborhood connection. If the North Tunnels were deemed inoperable, or the repairs deeded urgent, some passengers could use them to get to the Penn station neighborhood, more capacity would be needed by bus and flights

  • @dwaynerichardson5380
    @dwaynerichardson5380 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Someone forgot Metro North...

  • @de-fault_de-fault
    @de-fault_de-fault ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I am not excusing Chris Christie cancelling the ARC plan, because this was definitely not his rationale for doing it. But as it happens, it would only have done so much to enable the rehab needed for the original North River Tunnels because it didn't offer any rail connectivity to Sunnyside Yard and beyond. It would have taken some of the sting out of, say, closing one North River Tunnel at a time because it would have let NJT keep running a decent amount of service and left more of the (severely reduced) capacity in the remaining tunnel for Amtrak to use. In the end Gateway is a better project overall. I just can't get over the feeling that we're going to run out of time before it gets done, though, whereas ARC could have been done by now.

  • @jre617
    @jre617 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is interesting, but not being familiar with NYC area rail, I just couldn't really follow it. I wish you'd try again but simpler, if possible, and slower. Concentrate more on the map and less on stock train footage. Maybe start with a map of the existing system and then add the proposed changes in a different color as you talk about them.
    Nevertheless, thank you for attempting.

  • @bobbomaizer1654
    @bobbomaizer1654 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Seems as this may be a kick the can project as both new tunnels are single track which again seems to be the traffic bottleneck problem to begin with isn't it ? It's just rerouting the exit elsewhere

    • @hirampriggott1689
      @hirampriggott1689 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The existing tunnel is double track. The new gateway tunnel will be double track as well. Then the existing old tunnle wll be restored after the new tunnel is built, this four tracks between New Jersey and Manhattan, NYC

  • @michaelsmiley15
    @michaelsmiley15 ปีที่แล้ว

    You're not taking into account the new grand central madison terminal that was just opened about a year ago

    • @jorgegaston5391
      @jorgegaston5391 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s a different terminal. No access between Penn Station and Grand Central Terminal via railroad, except by subways.
      In 3 1/2 years from now, Another railroad is to serve Penn Station, which is Metro-North’s New Haven Line thru the Hell Gate Bridge and 4 new stations in The Bronx: Co-op City, Pelham Parkway, Parkchester Van Nest & Hunts Point. No stops in Queens.

    • @mrvwbug4423
      @mrvwbug4423 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jorgegaston5391 The no stops in queens makes sense, Queens is served by both NYC subway and LIRR.

    • @mrvwbug4423
      @mrvwbug4423 ปีที่แล้ว

      That terminal was built to allow LIRR to reach Grand Central, so that serves Queens and Long Island

  • @krazyfan2000
    @krazyfan2000 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They should have started the gateway project years ago.

    • @joecesa
      @joecesa ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Not to get political, but republicans said no. In fact right now, DeSantis--who voted against NYC-NJ getting relief rescue money for Hurricane Sandy--will now get money/help that he didn't think anyone in the NE Corridor should get. He said it was public welfare. The far-right is far wrong.

    • @krazyfan2000
      @krazyfan2000 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@joecesa that's right. You are correct. The Republicans never seem to want to invest in infrastructure unless something tragic happens in their state.

  • @jooproos6559
    @jooproos6559 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yep!If you built the track say in 1930 or so,that would seriously be cheaper!

    • @texaswunderkind
      @texaswunderkind ปีที่แล้ว

      Our great-grandparents should have done more. Lazy bastards.

  • @gohtigeriens7967
    @gohtigeriens7967 ปีที่แล้ว

    4:32 where is this video from

  • @stephenmokshefski698
    @stephenmokshefski698 ปีที่แล้ว

    You forgot Marc in Maryland

  • @keithfratus
    @keithfratus ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That artist's rendition of Penn Station South at 8:43 is definitely showing its age with that particular choice of skyscrapers in the background...

    • @AdiposeExpress
      @AdiposeExpress ปีที่แล้ว

      I only see the video as being 8:08 minutes ling, strange

    • @keithfratus
      @keithfratus ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AdiposeExpress it looks like he had to cut out that part of the video due to music copyright issues

    • @keithfratus
      @keithfratus ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AdiposeExpress fwiw, it was an artist's rendition with the twin towers in the background...

    • @AdiposeExpress
      @AdiposeExpress ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@keithfratusSucks because it feels quite jarring having them cut off mid sentence. But good to know it isn't just on my end.

  • @tim3172
    @tim3172 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    2:55 Christie Kream! It's amazing just how much he failed New Jersey.

    • @Distress.
      @Distress. ปีที่แล้ว

      He really didn't though. During his term he inherited a state with increasingly bad debt problems and had to steer them out of it. It's very difficult cause so much money has been squandered there and raising taxes anymore will just send even more people out of state.

  • @jamescox7007
    @jamescox7007 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The users of the tracks need to be responsible for 100% of the cost. Users are the company that receives money from ridership and not public funds.

  • @M2020-s5x
    @M2020-s5x ปีที่แล้ว

    The guy in charge quit because of all the problems

  • @mirzaahmed6589
    @mirzaahmed6589 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    There aren't 2200 trains a day on the NEC. That number is the aggregate for all the commuter rail agencies in the cities along the NEC, not just the trains that run on the corridor. Only a fraction of MBTA or SEPTA's trains actually run on the NEC. The total number, including Amtrak, is about 800-1000 trains.

  • @louismoore9196
    @louismoore9196 ปีที่แล้ว

    i feel like the NE corridor should just bite the cost and use SC maglev. no better place in the world than there for capacity

  • @steve76414A
    @steve76414A ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ARC was a crazy idea. This new one is still crazy. Yes, the tunnels need help. But way to costly.

    • @Tom-dt4ic
      @Tom-dt4ic ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I know, change is hard. Progress is hard. Better to just stay home and safe and live in the past.

  • @carlsmith5545
    @carlsmith5545 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Northeast corridor? If you're going to do it then do it right. The United States Atlantic bullet line from Boston Massachusetts to Jacksonville Florida. This would be a bullet train line that would run from Boston Massachusetts to Jacksonville Florida, stopping in one or two major city in each state it travels through. At 225 plus mph, you could move millions of americans up and down the entire United States Eastern seaboard each year and with the greatest of comfort. I could board in Philadelphia Pennsylvania and be at work in New York city in an hour or less and still be home in time for supper in the evening. Then i could spend my money in Pennsylvania where i live. This is called economic growth. It would take me 4 to 6 hours to get to Jacksonville Florida by bullet instead of 12 to 13 hours by car or 15 to 17 hours by EV. You damn right i would park my car and take the train, wouldn't you? This project would probably cost about 2 to 4 hundred billion dollars which is far beneficial, greater and better than putting some fool on mars for 500 plus billion dollars which would benefit absolutely no one except for the fool going there. But the mighty United States of America and it's people just doesn't see it thus the reason why this technology belongs to the far more advanced countries of the far east and Europe. Highspeed bullet trains and maglev super train technology, the new american dream.......

    • @jackeppington6488
      @jackeppington6488 ปีที่แล้ว

      Every stop slows down the time, though. A direct service between Florida and Boston would be faster. If SpaceX's Starship proves successful, point-to-point flights may be possible. The rocket would launch from Cape Canaveral fly a suborbital northeast trajectory up to 70-100 miles high, then swoop down to land at Boston in less than 30 minutes.

    • @carlsmith5545
      @carlsmith5545 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jackeppington6488 See you must be an American. The United States Atlantic bullet line would be made up of 4 lines 2 lines noth and south make the city to city stops. The other 2 lines are for express. This rocket technology you speak of, dosent exsist. Highspeed bullet trains and maglev super train technology, does. The so called (mighty) United States of America should of had this decades ago. You still can reach Jacksonville Florida from Philadelphia in less than 7 hours, a 12 to 13 hour trip by car. But americans don't see it. And fly? I watch the news. Thousands of Americans sit stranded at airports due to cancellations and delays during the holidays and travel seasons. A rocket? Lol!!! Highspeed bullet trains and maglev super train technology, the new american dream.....

  • @whiteknightcat
    @whiteknightcat ปีที่แล้ว +5

    GOP solution - encourage more people into cars and airplanes

    • @mrvwbug4423
      @mrvwbug4423 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yet they oppose road and airport expansion projects too haha

    • @maroon9273
      @maroon9273 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@mrvwbug4423especially a long island crossing and Midtown underground highway as well.

    • @whiteknightcat
      @whiteknightcat ปีที่แล้ว

      @@maroon9273 They haven't "donated" enough yet.

    • @texaswunderkind
      @texaswunderkind ปีที่แล้ว

      In Texas they build tolled lanes so the super-rich can get to work while everybody else is stuck in traffic.

    • @AntonioCunningham-jr2oj
      @AntonioCunningham-jr2oj 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why do that right if your license is revoked you cannot drive no cars and yes all airports could and can ban people from flying so yes sometimes trains and buses can be a solution to transportation problems 😊

  • @tombishop5835
    @tombishop5835 ปีที่แล้ว

    Remember the big in Boston billions in overruns and waste just wait till NJ &NYNY digs their pot of gold!

  • @josephyoung6749
    @josephyoung6749 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is such a pittance of a project... the fact the video's title says its failure is inevitable displays a lack of understanding surrounding the fact that countries with less liquidity than the US have built much more successful passenger rail

  • @rogertull8888
    @rogertull8888 ปีที่แล้ว

    THE NEW TUNNEL NEED TO BE 2 TRACKS IN EACH TUNNEL, EITHER EACH TUNNEL TRAVELLING IN THE SAME DIRECTION, OR ONE UP AND ONE DOWN PER TUNNEL

  • @Thesupermachine2000
    @Thesupermachine2000 ปีที่แล้ว

    I feel sorry for the us. It feels to me like a project this size gets finished every other year somewhere in europe.

  • @nicolek4076
    @nicolek4076 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have rarely heard such mangled English in my (fairly lengthy) life so far. Shakespeare invented many new words which have passed into common modern usage. It would be presumptuous to emulate him.

  • @Normal1855
    @Normal1855 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And make sure that the people in NYC pay for it.

  • @johnl5316
    @johnl5316 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:45...it "would impede with millions of commuters..." ?? It should say: "would impede millions of..." No 'WITH"

  • @jaybenekin
    @jaybenekin 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Passiac is pronounced “ pa say hick’ no pah SACK !

  • @Alrx7_
    @Alrx7_ ปีที่แล้ว +1

    someone forgot metro north

  • @Dog.soldier1950
    @Dog.soldier1950 ปีที่แล้ว

    24 trains an hour? That’s not much separation= 4 minutes!

    • @B3Band
      @B3Band ปีที่แล้ว

      5*

    • @texaswunderkind
      @texaswunderkind ปีที่แล้ว

      Have to really hurry if you're going to put a penny on that track!

  • @yolo_burrito
    @yolo_burrito ปีที่แล้ว

    SuPeRsToRm Hyperbole. It was barely a cat 1 at landfall and was only called a “superstorm” because it hit the tristate area.

  • @johns280
    @johns280 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Would love to see a clean modern rail system in the U.S. But the stations in too many destinations are a risk to stop at between 9 pm and 6 am. Travel by rail is nice but I won’t risk my life to do it.

    • @harrisonc985
      @harrisonc985 ปีที่แล้ว

      NJT Septa and the other commuter networks arent bad but i cannot say the same for the subway

    • @friedzombie4
      @friedzombie4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'd rather take my chances with some meth head with a knife then dodging F-150s going 50 in a residential.

    • @word42069
      @word42069 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      NJT is safe. Subway is safe in most places and statistically very safe. NJT definitely has less crazies than the MTA though.

  • @williamlloyd3769
    @williamlloyd3769 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Could never understand why US put a human on the moon but could match Japan’s bullet train.

  • @michaelkeudel8770
    @michaelkeudel8770 ปีที่แล้ว

    If it needs to be fixed, let's do it now, the infrastructure bill is looking for projects to fulfill. Puts lots of people to work with good paying jobs. It's already passed and signed into law, the moneys there. Not seeing a problem, would have been much cheaper if we'd just maintain as we went along, nows the time to do things right.

  • @Normal1855
    @Normal1855 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why does NYC think, I they fail, everyone else will fail? The rest of the state, and country would be fine.

  • @1Nanerz
    @1Nanerz ปีที่แล้ว

    The US government sure wastes a lot of money on stupid crap. This isn’t one of them and should be built ASAP. The NEC is as vital as the interstate highway system for American commerce.

  • @-Katastrophe
    @-Katastrophe 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'll be honest, considering what New Jersey did to their budget and debt before Christie I don't blame him for being "nah" on Arc, previous administrations royally screwed the pooch. I also don't really blame Trump that much, he might have shot down federal funding but he's not why it's been over 100 years since there was a new tunnel, merely one of many presidents who looked the other way. Also, nice jumpcut at 7:42

  • @tigerlee1106
    @tigerlee1106 ปีที่แล้ว

    Problem Amtrak owns NY Penn

  • @darkwoodmovies
    @darkwoodmovies ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I don't understand why Republicans always oppose these kinds of projects. Is it because it services a major metro area and not the small towns their voters live in? Or like why is this less important to them then another highway lane expansion that never works?

    • @B3Band
      @B3Band ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Because they haven't taken a train for most of their lives, and they think approving $1 of spending is a sign of weakness (unless it's to buy guns or burn books).

    • @gerbs139
      @gerbs139 ปีที่แล้ว

      Republicans have the sole agenda of preserving billionaire wealth. This project, as well as other HSR projects, don't further that agenda.

    • @mrvwbug4423
      @mrvwbug4423 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because they think they can win more voters by making life in urban areas as miserable as possible.

  • @stillfree47
    @stillfree47 ปีที่แล้ว

    yea we will see this done in year of 2100