7:29 Article 13 gives teeth to fundamental rights and makes them justiciable. Article 13(1) declares that all pre-constitutional laws shall be void to the extent of their inconsistencies with the fundamental rights. 9:06 10:23 Keshavanand Bharati OR Indira Gandhi case?? 11:08 12:28 Writs 13:19 14:15 14:50 15:24 18:06 32(3) 18:27 Emergency exceptions Article 252 20:57 Alternative Remedies what are they?? Ask@Miss 21:05 Against whom can a writ be issued. 22:26 needed? 23:09 who can apply. To 25:53 27:10 distinction between 32 , 226 28:48 supreme court role in 32 32:01 against the motion.
Very useful. Thank you
Super mam
7:29
Article 13 gives teeth to fundamental rights and makes them justiciable.
Article 13(1) declares that all pre-constitutional laws shall be void to the extent of their inconsistencies with the fundamental rights.
9:06
10:23 Keshavanand Bharati OR Indira Gandhi case??
11:08
12:28
Writs 13:19
14:15
14:50
15:24
18:06 32(3)
18:27 Emergency exceptions
Article 252
20:57 Alternative Remedies what are they?? Ask@Miss
21:05 Against whom can a writ be issued.
22:26 needed?
23:09 who can apply. To 25:53
27:10 distinction between 32 , 226
28:48 supreme court role in 32
32:01 against the motion.
Comprehensive vrdio
It's not keshvanand Bharti case it was Indra nehru Gandhi case and then Minerva mills held judicial review is basic structure of constitution..
make more videos
A robot is reading the texts . Nothing else. Practicing herself how to speak properly. Disappointed.