Make a Point Contact Transistor at home

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 พ.ค. 2024
  • Jeri shows how to make a point contact transistor with germanium and phosphor bronze contacts.

ความคิดเห็น • 119

  • @TheDradge
    @TheDradge 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I used to manufacture breakover diodes in a power semiconductor plant. Videos like this are great for new kids coming through to get an appreciation for the science behind semiconductors. Great work Jeri!

  • @sietzevandeburgt681
    @sietzevandeburgt681 7 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Indeed this is something that should be learned at school. At least at technical education directions. Certainly at MIT !!!

    • @ocayaro
      @ocayaro 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      MIT students probably have already done that at home even before setting foot in MIT.

  • @Tutoelectro1
    @Tutoelectro1 13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This was really good! Thank you so much for sharing this. This is the first time I see somebody making a transistor using a diode. Thanks!

  • @andyzweb
    @andyzweb 13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    very very cool
    I got all excited when I heard the oscillator!
    I can't wait to try this myself.
    That was a nice dedication at the end there too
    :)

  • @madamerotten
    @madamerotten 12 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This video is OVER THE TOP in greatness! I have some 2N23s here, which are early Ge point-contact transistors.

  • @gunnerdavidson7287
    @gunnerdavidson7287 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you! I needed this for an experiment and couldn’t find a good vid!

  • @nkubz
    @nkubz 13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you. With your drawing i finally understand how diodes and transistors works ! If some teachers could take example on your explanation it would have helped a lot when i was younger :)

  • @ThePhilStudio
    @ThePhilStudio 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Amazing video, even 12 years later ^-^

  • @manickn6819
    @manickn6819 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Well this was uploaded a long time ago. I am now thinking about trying to make a transistor and was doing a little searching to see who did what prior. Such a good piece of work here. Thanks for sharing. Think I will subscribe too.

  • @fddsagfdshdfgfdsdf
    @fddsagfdshdfgfdsdf 12 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Any gamma (photon) or beta (free electron) radiation which interacts in the depletion region of a PN junction will produce one or more electron-hole-pairs (excitons). The built-in voltage of the junction will cause the electron to drift towards the P side and the hole towards the N side. This is how a basic photodiode or solar cell works. You only need several million or billion gamma/beta rays per second to generate anything in the range of a few volts.

  • @G8DQX
    @G8DQX ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fascinating video. Thanks for putting it up.

  • @thewii552
    @thewii552 12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I remember that day that I figured out how to switch a BJT on and off. I killed a couple of them, but was very pleased in the end

  • @yorgle
    @yorgle 13 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Man, I wish i had you as a professor when I took (and failed) my EE classes back in college.

  • @EricFontaineJazz
    @EricFontaineJazz 13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Do it yourself transistor at home. Awesome! I love these videos...keep it up!

  • @JimmerSD
    @JimmerSD 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @trailkeeper Only the wrap on the strings are phosphor-bronze. The core is steel. Piano Strings also use this construction technique. Some actually are bronze wrapped nylon wrapping steel.

  • @gordo8189
    @gordo8189 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That is FREAKIN' AWESOME !!!

  • @Electronhacks
    @Electronhacks 13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So cool! Thanks for helping us learn.

  • @VividSauce
    @VividSauce 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love your videos, Jeri. You talk nerd like no other : )

  • @sinistermoon
    @sinistermoon 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So awesome! *puts in favorites*

  • @gushhnet
    @gushhnet 13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for another great, educational video! -- Heat seems to break the glass envelope rather easily as well, but I'm not sure if the properties of the die are changed permanently or not!

  • @AmazGraz
    @AmazGraz 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @jeriellsworth I was stunned. How neat! I mean, you just don't think of it being possible. And that parallels your experimentation on things, or visa versa. Why, tis fun to see and consider. It is.

  • @shodanxx
    @shodanxx 13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    that was clearer then the explanation I got in cegep !
    you mention you got some information from patents
    can you tell how you browsed/searched and viewed the patents ?
    there are a bunch of patent search engines online but the ones I tried the search was terrible and the patents were incomplete :( (figures mentionned in the document were missing for example)
    also using a pizeo headphone like you said in your standford talk, that's a great trick, especially for those who don't have scopes :)

  • @Jonnysea1986
    @Jonnysea1986 11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    They make phosphorus bronze acoustic guitar strings if you are interested in using something more like a pin.

  • @emdeeeff
    @emdeeeff 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @AmazGraz The gain would be theoretically linear in an ideal device, if there were such a thing.
    In reality, there's a range on one side where it doesn't conduct a signal at all, a range on the other side where it's wide open (and so burns up if you're not careful), and a range in the middle where it's fairly linear.
    That middle is what you use in (analog) amplifiers. In digital circuits you just use the all-the-way-off and all-the-way-on ends.

  • @InterdimensionalWiz
    @InterdimensionalWiz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant!

  • @DogByte2012
    @DogByte2012 10 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    You might want to try phosphor-bronze guitar strings for your collector formation. The high "E" string is nice and thin and you will get plenty of wire out of one string.

    • @seanfaherty
      @seanfaherty ปีที่แล้ว

      the high E is steel in most brands, the bronze alloy is wrapping the low strings

  • @AmazGraz
    @AmazGraz 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @AmazGraz I was into electronics when I was in high school, but I was, ever so regrettably, weak in math, and sad to say, discipline. But it still ever fascinates me.

  • @afterthought138
    @afterthought138 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fantastic.

  • @jdflyback
    @jdflyback 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    @jeriellsworth is it possible that the circuit is acting like a relaxation oscillator and the germanium is like a zener diode or like a spark gap?

  • @yellowmetalcyborg
    @yellowmetalcyborg 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This afternoon I found a link that could be helpful for making a ß cell. Gallium nitride is used for these batteries because it has the widest band gap, 3.4eV, out of all the common semiconductors (there are some other reasons why it's chosen over silicon carbide and gallium arsenide).
    If you want I can send you the link, it's a power point from a university in Iran. It's not a very high content source of information but it's the only one about ß cell semiconductors I've found thus far.

  • @yellowmetalcyborg
    @yellowmetalcyborg 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the info. The challenges seem to be in the construction rather than the theory. Theory will tell you which semiconductors to use, IIRC silicon carbide is the semiconductor of choice (cheap and rugged but not very efficient).
    The theory is deceivingly simple. In practice, layers of ultra-pure semiconducting material have to be deposited in uniform layers, merely nanometers thick. Tritium effuses very fast through everything and is extremely expensive (more expensive than gold).

  • @JohnSmith-ex1lv
    @JohnSmith-ex1lv 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow this was interesting! I do know the early years of transistor development had problems with pitting during diffusion on the semiconductor - it was a lot worse with Silicon though than Germanium as the melt temperature was a lot higher with silicon. With Silicon at least it was solvable with silicon dioxide (Frosch in early 1955).

    • @AnalogDude_
      @AnalogDude_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      did you see "Fran lab's" video from this year, a 40 minute black and white documentary on how they developed the transistor back than?
      also discusses the masking technique, math, etc, etc.

  • @AmazGraz
    @AmazGraz 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @jeriellsworth Well when you put it that way..... But mind you, I am but a rank amateur as an electronics buff. And since I have your attention, I have been wondering, as we know analog receiving circuits work by narrowing down the bandwidth to select the input we want to tune into and amplify. Does digital work this way, or does it bypass the capacitance/inductance tuning circuit?

  • @humbertogarzon1158
    @humbertogarzon1158 ปีที่แล้ว

    Me encanta su atrevimiento, un transistor en casa, buena esa.

  • @alphabeets
    @alphabeets 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @jeriellsworth You're so devious!! :) Thanks for responding. I agree with others, you should have your own show maybe on the Discovery Network.

  • @fddsagfdshdfgfdsdf
    @fddsagfdshdfgfdsdf 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    ...ctd...
    You'll also hear of PiN diodes, which have a layer of intrinsic semiconductor between the P and N region. Intrinsic just means there are no excess holes or electrons. Since the radiation must interact with the semiconductor lattice to produce an electron-hole-pair, and it must be in the depletion region for each to drift to its respective metal contact, the larger intrinsic (depletion) region allows for a better chance for this to happen as much as possible, producing more cell voltage

  • @nkubz
    @nkubz 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @onlygearwarrior Oh, i loved my science teachers too, but when coming to explaining PN junction it was like "when you're applying voltage they let pass current". They never explained why and how. That's why i couldn't understand and remember how they work (yes can't remember something i don't really understand)

  • @AmazGraz
    @AmazGraz 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @AmazGraz By the way, your 1N34 video is awesome too.

  • @lu5fhp
    @lu5fhp 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    AmazGraz, it is call amplifier because in diferent configuration you can control a big current out with and small current in

  • @sietzevandeburgt681
    @sietzevandeburgt681 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Anyway I read in my fathers very old Dutch books and magazines, that the real first experimental transistor was build, using a natural crystal, where wires where burnt in using high voltage and by burning them into the crystal, not only was the wire welded to it, but also by using the right kind of metal two either P or N regions where created with the cristal itself being the opposite of those two regions either P or N. Can't remember if the burned in wire caused a P or N region. This was first discovered as a means to make an advanced version of the cats-whiskers diode by burning in one wire preventing one had to feel around with the whisker. Someone for some reason decided to burn in two wires and started using measuring equipment and Voila the discovery of the transistor. This diode was called a contact diode to distinguish it from its predecessor the point contact diode aka cats-whisker diode. Some of these technical magazines of my father are stolen but if I can find the one describing it I might try building a prehistoric diode and transistor. Important in this is the use of a natural crystal since it is already slightly P or N by itself from natural occurring impurities. If I could only remember the right P or N it is not either P or N AFAIK it is always the same one of the two by nature. AFAIK this is how the transistor is really discovered, although there might be different story's. Sorry for the history lesson. Ps forgive me for any language mistakes since English is not my native speech Dutch is. Bedankt = thank you.

    • @yoramstein
      @yoramstein 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Welke Magazin was het van jouw vader? Mischien heb ik hem RB of Elektuur?of…….

    • @AntuQum
      @AntuQum 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can you give some references about your fathers journals and books? Very interesting topic.

  • @viscountalpha
    @viscountalpha 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jerri, I

  • @eliudcarrillo
    @eliudcarrillo 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i just love you

  • @thewii552
    @thewii552 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    was that the AMRAY for the microscope shots?

  • @jeriellsworth
    @jeriellsworth  13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @AmazGraz Yes. Hollow space goodness. That guy does a marvelous job of making them too.

  • @ArtemProf
    @ArtemProf 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hello Jeri!
    Did you stop recording your videos and doing experiments? Is it possible to ask some a little bit personal questions about the aim of these experiments, why did you do them?
    Thank you.

  • @edumation
    @edumation 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    great job

  • @tannersword1
    @tannersword1 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I want to make a small sputtering magnetron and use foil stencils or something, to make a bipolar transistor

  • @ShivamGupta-oh6ki
    @ShivamGupta-oh6ki 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    U r awesome!!

  • @yoramstein
    @yoramstein 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love you Jeri. Can you say what is going to be the NEXT THING in electronics. Memories? Capacitor that can hold charge for many years (to be used as memory) ?

  • @yellowmetalcyborg
    @yellowmetalcyborg 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    I recently stumbled upon some internet pages on tritium batteries; batteries that convert the kinetic energy of high energy ß rays emmited by ß emmitors (eg. tritium and zinc-70) into an electrical current. Now, these pages don't go into detail about what semiconductors are used to convert ß rays into an electrical current. Do you have any idea as to what kind of semiconductor might be used for this purpose? Every electronics and nuclear physics nerd I have asked so far had no clue.

  • @emdeeeff
    @emdeeeff 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @AmazGraz You're not getting something for nothing; it takes added power to get that bigger signal, which is why you have the battery/power supply hooked up to the collector.
    And of course you waste some of that power along the way; the Second Law always finds you, even if you're hiding in a transistor :)

  • @jeriellsworth
    @jeriellsworth  13 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    @yellowmetalcyborg I don't know for sure. I've always wanted to make a nuclear battery.

  • @evasuser
    @evasuser 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jeri is the best woman in the youtube, +1.

  • @Silver3xterior
    @Silver3xterior 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool!

  • @yellowmetalcyborg
    @yellowmetalcyborg 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @jeriellsworth I was wondering if you could use a solar cell. The band gap of the solar cell and the energies of the beta rays are probably not compatible and thus the efficiency of the cell would be quite low.

    • @leafbranch1872
      @leafbranch1872 ปีที่แล้ว

      You reminded me of George cove and his lowtech photovoltaic panel

  • @jeriellsworth
    @jeriellsworth  13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @AmazGraz Amplification doesn't seem too bad to me. Forming a larger copy of the input, doesn't imply there wont be losses.

  • @edgeeffect
    @edgeeffect 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Geri.... I FINALLY "get" how dopants and P-type or N-type work... If they'd just told us it was about covalent bonds when I was at school I would have "got" free electrons and holes from the get-go.

  • @thumper88888
    @thumper88888 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @AmazGraz Of course they are!
    an output signal is greater in amplitude than the input signal
    ."something from nothing. " is not relevant or implied.

  • @uberscientist
    @uberscientist 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    That made so much more sense o.o

  • @trailkeeper
    @trailkeeper 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think some acoustic guitar and maby some piano strings are phosphor-bronze metal.

  • @zate1982
    @zate1982 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Uhm, Hi Jeri. I just wanted to tell you that you should have a tv show on Discovery Channel, teaching things like this and the physics and chemistry involved, some like Mythbusters or How Stuff Works and including some good cgi animations. I'd love a show like that. Btw, time ago, i was trying (inspired by you ^_^) to change icons in my old mp3 player, by access the BIOS. Was a complete fail u.u but i know if you teach how, i'll learn.
    Nice video though

  • @AmazGraz
    @AmazGraz 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @AmazGraz Video 1 is voodoo. It is sorcery. I feel like making the sign of the Cross, and.... and..... Wow. I'm stunned.

  • @elpechos
    @elpechos 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow. Very impressive. That must of been tedious :)

  • @256byteram
    @256byteram 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Point contact transistors are odd things in their own right, the Alpha is higher than the Beta, so they have to be run in common base mode. This is the opposite to BJT's. I wonder if Jeri can explain why this is :)

  • @JohnWilkinsonTesla
    @JohnWilkinsonTesla 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there a way to make a larger, higher power version? You would likely need to have a larger surface area of doped material but with a transistor of appreciable size one can make hardier devices - if last gen tech.

    • @JohnWilkinsonTesla
      @JohnWilkinsonTesla 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      You would also need fairly high voltage to replace the cat's whisker. Tesla used a spark gap for this purpose, but his was two way. With an inductor one terminal and a cap of the other you can make them one way.

  • @abdohasan1
    @abdohasan1 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    very good like this and like you

  • @AmazGraz
    @AmazGraz 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    No doubt an Electric Discharge Machining device will be the best way to sharpen something to a point. I once read how that hypodermic needles were made ouchless by the EDM process once upon a time. Yea, I remember when they used to hurt when they put them in. But by EDM the burrs were removed. 6^)

  • @jeriellsworth
    @jeriellsworth  13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @alphabeets Luckily no. When you remove electrons from a most materials the attraction is so strong it will pick them up from things that come in contact. I should show the crazy electrophorus effect someday, where you can remove or add electrons to metal and then leave the metal in this state for a very long time. (or shock someone with it. :))

  • @nikosnikolakis6991
    @nikosnikolakis6991 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    cool

  • @PrivateOrdover
    @PrivateOrdover 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I understood everything but the holes. Could you give a detailed definition of said 🕳

  • @AmazGraz
    @AmazGraz 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @jeriellsworth Lucily no! LOL. Good answer.

  • @jeriellsworth
    @jeriellsworth  13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @trailkeeper piano wire might be easier to sharpen.

  • @pachatesla8951
    @pachatesla8951 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello how to wire a point transistor in a circuit? I'm looking for a schematic

    • @G8DQX
      @G8DQX ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Try en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase-shift_oscillator which one suspects is what Jeri used. But remember that 𝛽 will be quite low. It's a good idea to practice with a modern transistor first, something such as learningaboutelectronics.com/Articles/Sine-wave-generator-circuit-with-a-transistor.php might be fun & useful.

  • @jeriellsworth
    @jeriellsworth  13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @thewii552. It was optical.

  • @AmazGraz
    @AmazGraz 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why do they call them amplifiers? Technically they are not. Like one teacher said, "You don't get something from nothing." I think, technically, that they should be called gates. But they gave that name to another device. There may be a better name, a more descriptive name which relates to the fact that they 'gain' (or the associated circuit gains) relative to the bias applied. But that is not right either. Now is gain proportional, linear relative to the bias or simply predetermined by....?

  • @xeno8555
    @xeno8555 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You might want to remind kids or anyone to use safety goggles or eye protection for this one, as well as washing their hands after sanding the glass or material that gets on their hands!

  • @RedDogCobra19
    @RedDogCobra19 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can anyone please point me in the right direction of a schematic of an oscillator using only one PNP transistor.

  • @AmazGraz
    @AmazGraz 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @RSole52 Thas so funny 8^)

  • @handmadezebra7366
    @handmadezebra7366 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    you are so fucking cool

  • @AF-nh2ux
    @AF-nh2ux 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Phosphorus is an N type dopant though.

    • @RedDogCobra19
      @RedDogCobra19 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      True it is BUT I have a copy of a paper that Bardeen wrote that explains in full about a 3 point contact transistor. In that paper it states that Bell Labs tried different contacts. It states that the best contact was in fact a Phosphorus Bronze contact on an N-type piece of Germanium.
      The only thing wrong with Geri's experiment was on her collector forming. The paper states that it should be REVERSE biased and NOT Forward biased as she did in her experiment.

  • @jessereiter328
    @jessereiter328 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    FET would be easier no

  • @owendavidmalicsi5900
    @owendavidmalicsi5900 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey,just a little correction.There is no such a word like Acceptor....Its Recipient....Thank you!a wonderful video!

    • @revimfadli4666
      @revimfadli4666 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      AFAIK, acceptor's commonly used in electronics, while recipient's used in medicine

  • @seanfaherty
    @seanfaherty ปีที่แล้ว +1

    any video that starts " so a bunch of nerds..." gets a like from me

  • @acmefixer1
    @acmefixer1 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I appreciate your efforts, but after growing up with transistors, I find it exceedingly difficult to talk myself into going back to the early days and build a point contact transistor, especially when I can buy a hundred of the best silicon transistors for a few dollars. You showed the original point contact as being built on a slab of PN material. In the books I've read, I've never seen that, and I thought that the original was a solid block of a single material. Tell me I'm wrong, please.

  • @alphabeets
    @alphabeets 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    ...so, theoretically can a transistor be "used up"? Do the electrons leave it and get depleted like emptying the gas tank in a car? Perhaps the "depletion" would take a really long time becuase there are so many of them? Just curious. Jeri rules!

  • @ThainaYu
    @ThainaYu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The first 5 seconds sound nearly made me close this video

  • @yashas9974
    @yashas9974 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I am curious to know who are those 5 who disliked the video.

    • @jgl1991
      @jgl1991 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yashas closed minded people. They already know everything lol

    • @giacomobaldon1450
      @giacomobaldon1450 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Me, she destroyed a worthy germanium diode to make this, also she didn't show if it works or not... that sound at the end doesn't means nothing to me

    • @gordo8189
      @gordo8189 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Likely they have billions of transistors in their phone and don't see what difference one more will make...

    • @G8DQX
      @G8DQX ปีที่แล้ว

      @@giacomobaldon1450 The "sound at the end" means that the transistor has demonstrated power gain, and is thus, in principle, useful!

    • @aidanb.9043
      @aidanb.9043 ปีที่แล้ว

      the anti semiconductor comittee

  • @melody3741
    @melody3741 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    THAT'S WHY THE F****** DIODE SYMBOL LOOKS LIKE THAT??

  • @jeriellsworth
    @jeriellsworth  13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @yellowmetalcyborg I'd love to see it. You can send a pointer to scorched.chips at gmail.com