Sir, if there is a 0 in between my confidence intervals for indirect effect, but my p value is significant, then what should i report? Can i report the p vale, instead of confidence intervals?
In my case path X to M (p1) and path M to Y(p2) are negative and p3 is postive. Multiple of p1 and p2 is mathematical positve and in essence also these two paths are supposed to be negative as per theory and literature. With direct effect positive and indirect effect also positive, when actually the paths to and from mediators are actually negative, are significant at .05. How shall I interpret this result.
Sir, if there is a 0 in between my confidence intervals for indirect effect, but my p value is significant, then what should i report? Can i report the p vale, instead of confidence intervals?
In my case path X to M (p1) and path M to Y(p2) are negative and p3 is postive. Multiple of p1 and p2 is mathematical positve and in essence also these two paths are supposed to be negative as per theory and literature. With direct effect positive and indirect effect also positive, when actually the paths to and from mediators are actually negative, are significant at .05. How shall I interpret this result.
Great video sir. Thanks alot. Is this hair et al. Criteria or zhao et al .,2010 criteria for mediation??