Why get married? As a male all your assets and children are at risk and you lose15 years of your life and all your money. All she has to do is leave and tell the "Family Court" a few lies and you are stuffed.
No fault divorce works well for those who can repartner easily: young, childess women and well off men of any age. Politicians are usually in the second category, as are judges in the Family Court. They have nothing to lose from divorce. Anything that they have to give their first wives, is offset by the contribution their new, younger, employed wives will make to their next household.
I would say yes, since women and their political wing feminists. Pushed a policy of combining no fault divorce with the division of assets. That has turned marriage into quite honestly a sick joke.
The coexistence of no fault divorce along with the division of assets. Lobbied for by Australian woman has turned marriage into an openly criminal contact.
Shouldn't be allowed to have kids without being married otherwise you pay for your kids yourself. Too many having kids with different people and getting everyone else to pay for them. They should be forced to get married or fined.
We live in a throw-away society and it's becoming more and more clear every day that is the case. People don't value much of anything anymore. Such a pity many think there is a bad stigma to marriage. More fool for them!
If either spouse can break down the marriage on no grounds at all, against the wishes of the other spouse, halving his or her living standard, without incurring a penalty or being required to compensate the other spouse, then marriage does not exist. The vows made during at the wedding, before witnesses, have not been legally binding since the 1975 Family Law Act was passed. Since 1975, weddings have been no more than parties and marriage certificates are not worth the paper that they are printed on. People don't tie the knot because there is no knot to tie.
@@cobar5342 Yes, and marriage contracts ceased to be legally binding when the 1975 Family Law Act was passed. So, effectively, there is no longer a contract. Marriage is a fiction residing in the minds of lawyers.
This woman needs a lesson on a host of topics. No wonder her marriage broke down. The family is the base of the western tradition, its breakdown has been a significant negative element contributing to the breakdon of society
Marriage between men, woman and god was good. But including government is where it went wrong. It's better to not get married while government is involved. Divorce courts are too heavy stacked against men for us to care these days. You have to know she is worth it but us men also know that even when we're 100% it sure isn't worth it on the risk assessment. There are countless guys in the men's spaces thought they were 100% sure and find out later it wasn't worth it. I believe in the notion of marriage but It's too corrupt so sorry.
Marriage is found in all cultures because all the humans on earth have to cope with the same biological realities: raising a child is a two person task and men want to know that the children that they are raising are their own. While it is obvious who the child's mother is, because he comes out of her body, the father is unknown. Fatherhood is defined by a man's relationship with the child's mother. Marriage is a contract between a man and a woman in which the man recognizes the children of the woman as his own legitimate offspring and undertakes to support them to adulthood. Hence the enormous importance placed upon the chastity and faithfulness of wives
No, it is due to the 1975 Family Law Act which rendered everyone's marriage contracts null and void. The vows made at the wedding used to be legally binding and there were penalties for breaking them. Divorce is a cruelty imposed by one spouse on the other. The function of the Family Law Courts is to facilitate that cruelty, on behalf of the cheat.
And yet.....me and my (very highly skilled German) fiancé wish to get married, but in Australia it's ridiculously convoluted and costly. So, we're doing it in Denmark & AUS can f-off.
Most of the fights come from money caused by greed and inflation. Living together is Sin, Marriage is from God for families, follow his commandments and there will be a be very little fights. Man is to leave his father mother cleave to his wife, not Girl friend creating single parents. No man can marry a man same for a woman, you all need to repent of your sins and save your soul from condemnation, eternity suffering hell fire.
If a person wants to marry someone else just to make the other person happy, Go ahead and do that. But they should also book an appointment to a psychiatrist. ;)
I'm a semi-hermit who lives and fights for himself. Society is shit. Single, unmarried, and childless. And that's how I like it. I've seen too many disasters on the Discovery Channel. MERC LIFE.😂
07:30 good that this woman pointed out that marriage is ancient and has different expressions in different cultures. Jana was taking an overly narrow view. Not all societies are patrilineal Jana.
All societies, patrilineal or matrilineal (there has never been a matriarchal society) have to deal with the same biological realities. Raising a child is a two person task at the very least. Men want to know that they children that they are raising are their own biological children. Hence the enormous importance attached to the chastity of wives. Marriage is the contract by which fathers are assigned to children. Fatherhood is determined by the man's relationship with the child's mother. And it is obvious who the child's mother is, because the child comes out of her body. The identity of the father is not obvious. It is only the discovery of DNA testing that has made paternity identifiable.
Marry becouse religion as human choise to live this life in religion faith Our goverment give the sertifikat land for cristian Indonesia or cristian non Indonesia to build a cruch for worship
Why get married? As a male all your assets and children are at risk and you lose15 years of your life and all your money.
All she has to do is leave and tell the "Family Court" a few lies and you are stuffed.
The coexistence of no fault divorce with the division of assets is apartheid levels of bigotry.
Agree true so that's why we need to honor Gods commandments. Man is head
of the house hold Jesus is head of the church.
It is 'household' and your other punctuation could do with some 'Gods" help too@@truthandlife4101
That can happen anyway though. Be mindful of cohabitation.
@@roberttbrockwayA concept that is both inhumane and worth of total abolition.
No fault divorce along with the division of assets renders marriage a sick joke and fictional construct.
No fault divorce works well for those who can repartner easily: young, childess women and well off men of any age.
Politicians are usually in the second category, as are judges in the Family Court. They have nothing to lose from divorce. Anything that they have to give their first wives, is offset by the contribution their new, younger, employed wives will make to their next household.
Don’t blame men for this one
Marriage makes man miserable. And Divorce can ruin your life. So the safe choice is not to marry at all.
Does feminism have anything to do with the reduction of marriage?.
Of course! cheers
I would say yes, since women and their political wing feminists. Pushed a policy of combining no fault divorce with the division of assets. That has turned marriage into quite honestly a sick joke.
@@morganclare4704 how?.
The coexistence of no fault divorce along with the division of assets. Lobbied for by Australian woman has turned marriage into an openly criminal contact.
No fault divorce makes motherhood untenable.
all she has to say is: I'm not happy anymore. Than take half yo shit.
Most people are too in love with themselves these days to be able to commit to a relationship.
Marriage is 'Toxic more often than not'
Jana Hocking seems a little too toxic for my liking
You should read some of it’s so called dating articles. She’s repulsive.
"Marriage is a wonderful institution, but who wants to live in an institution?" ~ Groucho Marx
I never met a "happy" married man😂😂😂
Shouldn't be allowed to have kids without being married otherwise you pay for your kids yourself. Too many having kids with different people and getting everyone else to pay for them. They should be forced to get married or fined.
True but how do you monitor that?
CHANGE THE LAWS FFS
IF A PERSON OWNS ASSETS BEFORE MARRIAGE THEY SHOULD STAY THAT PERSONS ASSETS.
sorry for yelling but governments need to wake up.
We live in a throw-away society and it's becoming more and more clear every day that is the case. People don't value much of anything anymore. Such a pity many think there is a bad stigma to marriage. More fool for them!
The law around it is bad anyone refusing to see that is a fool.
EVERYTHING is on the decline in Australia
A broken society...
Isaac newton never got married and never had children, why should i?
If either spouse can break down the marriage on no grounds at all, against the wishes of the other spouse, halving his or her living standard, without incurring a penalty or being required to compensate the other spouse, then marriage does not exist.
The vows made during at the wedding, before witnesses, have not been legally binding since the 1975 Family Law Act was passed.
Since 1975, weddings have been no more than parties and marriage certificates are not worth the paper that they are printed on. People don't tie the knot because there is no knot to tie.
The 'knot' is the contract, is it not?
@@cobar5342 Yes, and marriage contracts ceased to be legally binding when the 1975 Family Law Act was passed. So, effectively, there is no longer a contract.
Marriage is a fiction residing in the minds of lawyers.
@@cobar5342 Yes, but the contract is no longer legally binding. So not a knot that ties.
The consequences are though. Loss of kids, house all your money and 15 years of Hell@@chriswatson1698
THANKS TO WOKENESS AND LUNACY
All because AnAl dumped Alan for Jodie 😂
This woman needs a lesson on a host of topics. No wonder her marriage broke down.
The family is the base of the western tradition, its breakdown has been a significant negative element contributing to the breakdon of society
That Jana woman is disgustingly rude. Her ex-husband dodged a bullet.
idolatry is the root of any evilness
Businesses hear Wedding and the price goes up robbing people same for government charges and fees.
Demoralization of our society. It's all deliberate and targeted also.
Marriage between men, woman and god was good. But including government is where it went wrong. It's better to not get married while government is involved. Divorce courts are too heavy stacked against men for us to care these days. You have to know she is worth it but us men also know that even when we're 100% it sure isn't worth it on the risk assessment. There are countless guys in the men's spaces thought they were 100% sure and find out later it wasn't worth it. I believe in the notion of marriage but It's too corrupt so sorry.
Marriage is like putting all your money on roulette
Marriage is found in all cultures because all the humans on earth have to cope with the same biological realities: raising a child is a two person task and men want to know that the children that they are raising are their own. While it is obvious who the child's mother is, because he comes out of her body, the father is unknown. Fatherhood is defined by a man's relationship with the child's mother.
Marriage is a contract between a man and a woman in which the man recognizes the children of the woman as his own legitimate offspring and undertakes to support them to adulthood. Hence the enormous importance placed upon the chastity and faithfulness of wives
Well not always, switched at birth is a thing.
Jana Hockimg data advisor? Taaahahaha
Look up Jana Hocking Better Bachelor , youll see why she is a joke
There were CIVIL unions for homosexuals from 2004 onwards but they wanted marriage...
How can you justify marriage when their coexists no fault and the division of assets.
And its all thanks to Dan Andrews
Really?.
No, it is due to the 1975 Family Law Act which rendered everyone's marriage contracts null and void. The vows made at the wedding used to be legally binding and there were penalties for breaking them.
Divorce is a cruelty imposed by one spouse on the other. The function of the Family Law Courts is to facilitate that cruelty, on behalf of the cheat.
And yet.....me and my (very highly skilled German) fiancé wish to get married, but in Australia it's ridiculously convoluted and costly. So, we're doing it in Denmark & AUS can f-off.
Most of the fights come from money caused by greed and inflation. Living together is Sin, Marriage is from God for families, follow his commandments and there will be a
be very little fights. Man is to leave his father mother cleave to his wife, not Girl friend creating single parents. No man can marry a man same for a woman, you all need
to repent of your sins and save your soul from condemnation, eternity suffering hell fire.
There is no right or wrong, Only consequences!
Good and bad on both sides of the argument, Just do whatever makes you happy.
But thats selfish lol
If a person wants to marry someone else just to make the other person happy, Go ahead and do that.
But they should also book an appointment to a psychiatrist. ;)
Hope it is ...the less the better in this country ..the country is in decline not marriage
5:00 Women who were historically working their fingers to the bone might want to have a word with Jana.
AI and Meta would master in mainstream affordable spouses thanks to Bidenomics
I'm a semi-hermit who lives and fights for himself. Society is shit. Single, unmarried, and
childless. And that's how I like it. I've seen too many disasters on the Discovery Channel. MERC LIFE.😂
04:32 Let's be clear, Jana made it about gender. She had also previous spoken over Lyle Shelton.
07:30 good that this woman pointed out that marriage is ancient and has different expressions in different cultures. Jana was taking an overly narrow view. Not all societies are patrilineal Jana.
All societies, patrilineal or matrilineal (there has never been a matriarchal society) have to deal with the same biological realities. Raising a child is a two person task at the very least. Men want to know that they children that they are raising are their own biological children. Hence the enormous importance attached to the chastity of wives.
Marriage is the contract by which fathers are assigned to children. Fatherhood is determined by the man's relationship with the child's mother. And it is obvious who the child's mother is, because the child comes out of her body. The identity of the father is not obvious. It is only the discovery of DNA testing that has made paternity identifiable.
"Till death us do part" wasn't so bad when life expectancy was shorter! ;-)
Too distracted by the zombie machine in their hands.
Are Janas kids deeply traumatised???
What kids??
Good point.@@llisahill414
I agree with the look on the man's face at 2:58.
All by design....
The same happens in Brazil.
Marry becouse religion as human choise to live this life in religion faith
Our goverment give the sertifikat land for cristian Indonesia or cristian non Indonesia to build a cruch for worship
My partner works at a wedding venue. Trust me, there a plenty of weddings still occurring
No I don't trust you
@@TheFockerizer lol, don't care
Lol, anecdotes over data?
@@chadcadsonvii5258 Depends on where the data comes from lol
yea I'm thinking LGBT is killing marriage.
Nope, promiscuity is killing marriage.