"Basil! Basil! Basil, what, do you thing you are doing rubbing shoulders with Vikings and Templar Knights?"......."Just a spot of, um, of...'hunting' Sybil dear".
“For nine centuries the great City (Byzantium/Constantinople) had been the capital of Christian civilization. It was filled with works of art that had survived from Ancient Greece and with the masterpieces of its own exquisite craftsmen.” - Sir Steven Runciman, pre-eminent British historian and author
@@geoffreyrosadocertifiedbos3385 it was most Christian then other claim to be Christian in Western Europe such as Paul the Apostle visit Athens and preach the gospel and on and on !! At the 4th crusade which it sacked Constantinople the barbarian uneducated European crusaders such as the Franks and their cousins the Germanic tribes. We’re looking for the true Christianity ✝️ in the Constantinople the Queen of cities and much more all their treasures and lute was carried away and scattered and it can found in private collections or in Rome which are plenty of stolen lute over there !! Nothing personal just the facts !!
"Far from being a moribund society..., it (Byzantium) was the greatest, most active and most enduring political organism that the world has yet seen..." - F.M. Powicke, English historian
I like when Harald Hardraad had enough of the empress and took the Varangian gurd to the port, having to fight through several legions to do it, then took the ships necessary and sailed to norway. He then built an army large enough to invade england.
I'm pretty sure Andrew Gough just pre-records a bunch of vauge commentary in a room somewhere and then the editors compile it to match whatever the topic is.
haha thank you - I'm 15 minutes in and it's just a bunch of random clips of violence and 100 different ways of saying, "The Varangians liked fighting". Wow. Thanks. I've learned so much.
In what is now Sweden there was a law in the late viking Age made to prevent that to many of the young men went to Mikklagård and joined the Vangarian Guard. It was so popular to join that force for a while that the Swedish king had to do something to keep the best warriors for him self.
I would like to mention that Amon Amarth even has a song about them. "Varyags of Miklagaard." "Miklagaard has been our home for 20 years or more We've lent our axes, spears, and swords In service of the emperor We are loyal warriors That's the oath we gave To protect the emperor even to a violent grave"
Clearly, Harald Hardrada was an out-of-the-box thinker and charismatic leader. He believed in the power of the Skald, the Norse record-keeper/storytellers very much. Probably the main reason we have these tales. It is ironic though that after roaming the eastern Med, that his eventual undoing likely involved inclemently warm weather, former Roman roads (and the English longbow) at the Battle of Stamford Bridge. His force at Stamford Bridge in 1066 had left much of their armor at the boats due to the heat, and had underestimated the speed in which Harald Godwinson's army would arrive from the south via Roman-built roads. Even though Harald H. caught an arrow to the neck and perished with his army, they damaged Harald G.'s army bad enough that they lost their next crucial battle for control of England at Hastings. Even in death, Harald Hardrada's impacts on the western world are felt yet today via the Normans, another Norse-derived culture. The arrival of Haley's Comet in early 1066 was to portent a very eventful year-and did not disappoint.
He was quite a boy wasn't he, fighting for his half brother at 15& escaping afterwards,shows how rich Constantinople must have been that he used his loot to become king of Norway, love his escape from there too, just read a book about him but you get the feeling that there was so much more to tell
Not only did Harald Hardrada believe in the power of the Skald, but was reportedly a poet himself, and according to saga was making up poetry while fighting at Stamford Bridge. Tom Shippey in his book "Laughing shall I die" writes about that.
The Varangian Guard was not only the sole unit under the Emperor’s command that he could trust. They also could teach the rest of the Roman (read: ‘Byzantine’) army and establishment a thing or two about professionalism and integrity
12:55 There actually weren't that many Byzantine Emperors who were assassinated, The main purpose of an emperors "bodyguard' was not to prevent him from being assassinated, it was his private military force paid directly by himself, the emperor. If one of the emperor's vassals rebelled then that vassals soldiers would almost certainly remain loyal to him rather than the emperor. So the Varangian Guard did whatever the emperor required them to do, they did act as a literal bodyguard, even being trusted with the keys to the city while the emperor was away, but they also acted as law enforcement as well, but the main purpose was to act as loyal retainers ready to defend the emperor in case of rebellion which was incredibly common in the Eastern Roman Empire. They were his insurance against the scheming nobility, so they were very well paid and had their own special privileges. So while assassination was a threat, more emperors were deposed through military coups than assassination. That's the purpose of having a private army rather than lets say Game of Thrones Kings Guard.
Westerners and their "Academia" are trying to represent Orthodox leaders as they are Vatican leaders. Not a word about them destroying, or directly helping destruction of all 3 Orthodox Tzars.
There are suspicions that Basil II's father was assassinated, having died at age 26. His father ruled for only 4 years. His father, Basil II's grandfather is suspected of having been assassinated. Basil was made co-emperor with his brother, both children. As such, their regent Nicephorus Phocas became emperor. He was assassinated. He was followed by John Tzimiskes, who was suspected of having been assassinated. Not to mention the civil war led by Phocas's relatives. After Basil II and his brother died, the next emperor was Romanos III..... who was assassinated after ruling for 6 years. So if assassinations of Byzantine Emperors was rare... it certainly wasn't in the time-period!
@@Valchrist1313 in that time frame how many disloyal vassals tried to rebel? Read what i said more carefully. i didn't say that emperors weren't assassinated, I said that the point of the varangians was not primarily as a literal bodyguard, but his personal private army. So whats your point? An emperor didnt employ as many Varangians as he possibly could to stand outside his chambers. What about the Varangians of the sea? were they standing guard at night? Calling them "bodyguards" is not a great description. It may have been more prestigious than referring to them as retainers, but that's what they were. The elite standing/professional troops of the Byzantine Army, paid directly by the emperor, and recruited from outside the empire in order to ensure loyalty to the emperor rather than a noble family.
@@adamwee382 You said 'there weren't that many' implying it was uncommon. Yet, the two predecessors and two successors were likely assassinated. The video actually does go over the other stuff too!
@@Valchrist1313 No, you're making the assumption and you're imposing it onto me. Read carefully the context of what i've said. I implied that rebellious factions leading armies were statistically more dangerous than assassinations. That does not mean that I said or even implied that assassinations didn't occur, or were even rare. I was merely stating that calling the Varangians "bodyguards" is misleading, even if that's how they were referred to at the time. No eastern Roman Emperor retained hundreds of Varangians to act as his literal bodyguard. Nothing you've said contradicts my original argument, which was "The main purpose of an emperors "bodyguard' was not to prevent him from being assassinated, it was his private military force paid directly by himself, the Emperor" So again, and for the last time, i really don't understand your point.
I like the way you name the Byzantium Empire the dark ages... The East never experienced dark ages like the west... It was only after the fall of Constantinople and the invasion of the "utman Turk" did the East experience dark ages Most of the elite and educated East had escaped to the west and Italy after the fall of Byzantium which began the revival or the renaissance of Europe
Byzantine Dark Ages is a historiographical term for the period in the history of the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire, during the 7th and 8th centuries, which marks the transition between the late antique early Byzantine period and the "medieval" middle Byzantine era.
@@maryamkim1281 I think that the dark ages (and the subsequent lost of independence ) of of the East started the 1204 ( (first sack of the Polis). The crusaders took the wealth and the light of the Empire starting the enlightenment of the West .
In 1081 at Dyrrhachium, the Varangian Guard faced the same person whose feint and charge broke the English shield wall in the Battle of Hastings: Brian of Brittany. The result was very much the same. Although Brian was instrumental in that defeat of Alexios Comnenos, the Emperor's daughter Anna Comnene described Brian as "the most courageous and most honourable of all the Gauls".
@@howwwwwyyyyy The BT is a primary source, and its principal narrator was Brian's brother Alan Rufus, captain of Duke/King William's household knights. The longest scene on the BT shows the Breton second-in-command (presumably Brian) assailing the English frontlines (led by Earls Leofwine and Gyrth) from the left (West) while Alan led an assault from the right (East) over water traps.
Byzantium did not have a Dark Age. As the late Merle E. Severy, Editor, National Geographic, wrote: "The Dark Ages are only dark if you look at Western Europe, for long centuries a back-water: decaying towns, isolated manors, scattered monasteries, squabbling robber barons. In the East blazed the light of Byzantium, studded with cities such as Thessalonica, Antioch, and Alexandria, more cosmopolitan than any Western society before the modern age."
Byzantine Dark Ages is a historiographical term for the period in the history of the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire, during the 7th and 8th centuries, which marks the transition between the late antique early Byzantine period and the "medieval" middle Byzantine era.
There was no "Dark Age Byzantium". Read what the famous Medieval French crusader wrote about Byzantium: "One could not believe there was so rich a city in all the world. All those who had never seen Constantinople before gazed with astonishment at the city. They had never imagined that anywhere in the world there could be a city like this. They gazed with wonder at its rich palaces and mighty churches, for it was difficult for them to believe that there were indeed so many of them. As they gazed at the length and breadth of that superb city there was not a man, however brave and daring, who did not feel a shudder down his spine." - Geoffrey de Villehardouin
Byzantine Dark Ages is a historiographical term for the period in the history of the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire, during the 7th and 8th centuries, which marks the transition between the late antique early Byzantine period and the "medieval" middle Byzantine era.
I am a second generation Swedish American. My Mom's parents came from Sweden. I grew up listening to my grandfather tell stories about our ancestors and their travels. I was lucky enough to go to Sweden with my grandfather. Met my relatives in the village thats been home for generations. Got to be tough to survive a place where bears roam around trying to fstten up for winter.
@@benparrish672 Why would you tell me to leave the country I am a citizen of?. I love my heritage. My ancestors traveled through the Russians to the Middle East. Fought in the Crusades. My ancestors raised an army to restore Gustav Vasa as King of Sweden. I've traveled all over Europe several times. I love being an American.
Some monumental works regarding the Greek Byzantine Empire by two experts of Byzantine History, include; Warren Treadgold “A Concise History of Byzantium”, “A History of the Byzantine State and Society”, “Byzantium and Its Army, 284-1081”, “The Byzantine Revival, 780-842”. Sir Steven Runciman “Byzantine Civilization”, “The Fall of Constantinople 1453”, “The Great Church in Captivity: A Study of the Patriarchate of Constantinople from the Eve of the Turkish Conquest to the Greek War of Independence”, “Byzantine Style and Civilization”, “The Last Byzantine Renaissance”. All epic. Truly, an academic treasure.
The fact that the people in this documentary are demonstrating how they inflict wounds with these weapons, rather than expressing the perspective of being butchered by them, pretty much sums up why we still have wars today. They don't like it up em
The ploy of faking death was not an homage to the Greek Trojan horse. It is far more likely that he remembered one of many famed tales of Ragnar Lothbrok and his sons, as Ragnar did the exact same ploy many years prior to this. Even Netflix managed to put this ploy into the show before leaving the source material very early on and goes full Hollywood. To bad we never got to see any of the very clever ploys of Ivar the boneless in the show. Interesting how he used the ploy of setting birds on fire several hundred years before Ghengis Khan got the same idea, which might indicate that it probably happened more often than its written down.
Using the local birds to burn down the city was a ploy used by St. Olga of Kyiv to finish off the drevlinians. It is most likely while Harald stayed in Kyiv he heard that story and later used the same tactic. Though with any of these tales we can never be certain of what really happened.
The real Harald journey was much more insane. He began his lifelong journey to avenge his brother and reclaim the throne of Norway since he was only 15 years old. His journey was filled with war and battle in many foreign lands. His life was literally one of those protagonist story you would only think existed in movies. He began as a young inexperienced second son return to where his journey began as one of the most battle hardened warriors with cunning political skills.
Many of the Varangian Guard later consisted of Anglo-Saxons, who had fled England after the defeat at Hastings by William the Conqueror and the Normans. Around 15 years or so later, Robert Guiscard, his son Bohemond and the Norman army did battle against the Byzantines and the Anglo-Saxon Varangian Guard at the Battle of Dyrrhachiu and gave them a humiliating defeat.
Seems we are at that point where making a history documentary can be what ever you want as long as you can present it skilfully. What a sad time we live in
Yes Rurick was a Viking noble called by the Slavic nobility to rule over them hence the formation of the Kievan Rus the ancestors of modern Say Russians and Ukrainians.
Did everyone miss the part where he says The Grand Prince of Kiev in WHERE????? Ukraine?????? Hey England PHD and so on.....Stop it with these cheap shots they are quiet sad.......for someone of your status.
a great movie! I was particularly impressed by the fact that the authors of the film understand well the difference between Kievan Rus - Ukraine and Mordor, which called itself Russia.
16:28 lmao, wtf. The Varangian guard were touring around the Red Light district, were they? Apparently they were big fans of the 10th/11th century neon lights!
Fun fact after the Norman invasion of Anglo Saxons England 300 ships fled from the country and headed to join byzantines vrangian guard. It is said that after this soon the majority of their men were Anglo Saxons. Unfortunately thjs is undermined and not acknowledged to the same extent as the viking culture despite contributing just as much.
The history is written by the winners, Im not sure I believe my anchestors were that barbaric😂 like more than other people living in Europe at the time. These kind of documentaries always exaggerate stuff. Greatings from Norway
Lots of Anglo Saxons fled to Constantinople and joined the Varangian Guard after William The Conqueror won the Battle of Hastings. It's worth a Google.
If anyone's interested in serially hardcore Medieval Scandinavian warfare including the Varangian Guard I strongly recommend Schwerpunkt's relative playlist
Basil? Basil Fawlty? The name Harald Hardrada rings a bell. Didn't we defeat him at the Battle of Stamford Bridge (1066)? No Sparrows (or Magpies) were harmed in the making of this video.
His fortune left him when he tried to invade England, he was defeated and killed by the Anglo-Saxon in the Battle of Stamford Bridge in 1066, the Englo-Saxon King Harold Godwinson was defeated and killed by the Duc of Normandy William the conqueror in the battle of Hastings ....
It’s crazy to me how people have the nerve to cast judgement upon people in history.. like applying modern standards and ideals back then is ridiculous
A Greek emperor called Basil, sounds like a longshoreman from Kent. You'd almost be forgiven for thinking that his real name was Basileus. Also it's Hardrada, not Hadrada.
Hardraade = strongheaded. Brits has never ever understood or known much about their northern neighbours. They have their own silly version of history. The illustrations here is wery naive, wery few are capable of recreating the vikings skill level. But if you want to get a glimse, take a closer look at Gannicus in "Spartacus" (2010). Notice how this skilled fighter prefer to move light carrying one sword in each hand, fighting bare wearing no armour or "serk". This fearless fighting-style was later known as "going berserk". Even the "story" about the battle at stamford bridge in 1066 is not correct. the norwegians met an army of normanners first and won the battle. Then when they were on their way back to they`re ships, tired and unprepeared the english king saw his chanse and attacked them when they were tired and not wearing their armour.
300 ships invaded and 24 went home...😅 I bet they weren't as tired as the English were at Hastings, having marched the length of England in a couple of weeks, after Stamford Bridge.
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ It took a 🇳🇴 Norwegian 🇳🇴 King! This documentary gets five stars for getting ALMOST everything right. But it's a load of nonsense that, at least Norwegian and Danish Vikings didn't know how to fight disciplined! They had to have an extreme degree of discipline, because they almost always fought vastly outnumbered abroad. You don't win such battles by running around like headless, leaderless chickens. You needed Brawns AND Brains! Take it from a descendant of Harald Fairhair!
De prøver å si vi var blodtørstige idioter som springer rundt som hodeløse kyllinger. De vet ingenting om vår historie. Hadde vi hadd samhold og ikke kriget med hverandre hadde vi tatt over Europa.
There is no significant evidence of the origin of the Kievan princes from the Scandinavian dynasties. The name of the first historically known ancestor of Vladimir is Igor. Some claim that this name comes from the Scandinavian Ingvar but maybe also from the West Slavic Igar/Jegar, which translates as hunter. The name of the next prince Svyatoslav has no analogues among the Scandinavians at all. You will agree that there is no such precedent in the world for conquerors to call their royal descendants in the second generation by the names of the conquered peoples. And the name Vladimir itself is of Gothic origin. Among the Scandinavians, the name Vladimir would appear many centuries later. The myth of the Danish origin of the Kievan princes was created by the princes of Moscow in order to correct their genealogy and separate from the Tatar origin. And then in Europe, Moscow grants were used to create myths, distorting the history of Eastern Europe.
PS: The second historical absurdity is that the number of soldiers sent by Vladimir to Constantinople was 6000 men. Think about it, SIX thousand without much damage to his own safety. For the Scandinavian peoples of the IX-X centuries, this is an unthinkable number. And this was at a time when the Vikings did not have enough strength to cope with England where were rich, but weak Christian states. Almost a century later, Norman's army, reinforced by the French and Britons in the number of 7,500 to 10,000, defeated 8,000 English troops of Harold II. This is, so, for a comparison of forces. By the way, Harold's II daughter, Gytha of Wessex, became the wife of Vladimir's great-grandson
Another myth about the path of the "Varangians to the Greeks" does not stand up to criticism. From the nearest river of the Baltic water basin to the Dnieper is about 40 kilometers.I would like to look at the fools driving sea drakars FORTY kilometers through swamps and forest thickets
I am not trying to prove that the Scandinavian warriors did not serve in the imperial guard. At different times, representatives of different peoples served there. But, has anyone wondered about the origin of the word varang? Var in one of the dialects of the ancient Slavic meant a blade, and varang meant a swordsman
*he was not Vladimir, and his father not Sviatoslav, but his father was Sveinald Ingvarsson, and his mother was Helga and not Olga, read the Viking Sagas, and you will see your Russian rulers over there, with their original, non slavic, germanic names, thank you ver, much!* ❤
@@christopherwiles543 the Angols, Saxons, Jutes, and Geats(Goths) were Germanic peoples. Scandinavians are also Germanic. They originated from Germania, not Scandinavia.
@@jacquelinevanderkooij4301it depends on the form of shield wall you're referring to. The Greco-Roman Phalanx was created by the Myceneans, was perfected by the Spartan hoplites, and subsequently spread to the rest of the Helenic world, where it was adopted by the Romans. The shield wall you're likely referring to was created by the Jutes and Geats, and perfected by the Norse and Danes. It spread to the British Isles by way of Norse invasion, and was adopted by English armies to combat the invading Norse vikingr. The Norse eventually assimilated into English society, becoming knights and soldiers, meaning their tactics and strategies were folded into the English way of doing battle. It was very much the same everywhere that the Norse landed.
Best Roman recovery in over 500 years The Macedonian Dinasty manage to double the size of the Eastern Roman Empire, at that time the Empire was at its peak an army of over 125000 strong powerful economy and stretching from Italy to Syria!.
Where do you think the concept of black ops units comes from?😂 Modern militaries didn't just magically get inspired to create small groups of highly-skilled, highly trained, covert operatives. Ancient armies had recon scouts, demolitions specialists called sappers, assassins, spies, espionage experts, and even small units.of shovk troops that were the ancient version of SEAL teams. Using modern common parlance to convey a thought or concept isn't new, nor is it inappropriate. It is, however, pretentious as hell, to think you have the authority to judge everyday common vernacular. Hop on out of the saddle, and give the high horse a break.
@@RickR69 How can you tell you are about to watch a stupid useless video about some elite military unit? They use the term "special forces" in the first 2 minutes. Because as we all know "special forces" operate in the palace and charge in the hundreds, riding horses.
@@howwwwwyyyyy I read about the fact that they were never used in actual warfare. the same as Arabs kept Sub Saharan guards. Also, one of the Varangians tried to rape a Greek Woman and the Hellen woman handed his Varangian Buttocks back to him. do a basic Google search and informed yourself.
"Basil! Basil! Basil, what, do you thing you are doing rubbing shoulders with Vikings and Templar Knights?"......."Just a spot of, um, of...'hunting' Sybil dear".
“For nine centuries the great City (Byzantium/Constantinople) had been the capital of Christian civilization. It was filled with works of art that had survived from Ancient Greece and with the masterpieces of its own exquisite craftsmen.”
- Sir Steven Runciman, pre-eminent British historian and author
Yeah but what if I were to say constinapole wasn't truly Christian??
@@geoffreyrosadocertifiedbos3385 it was most Christian then other claim to be Christian in Western Europe such as Paul the Apostle visit Athens and preach the gospel and on and on !! At the 4th crusade which it sacked Constantinople the barbarian uneducated European crusaders such as the Franks and their cousins the Germanic tribes. We’re looking for the true Christianity ✝️ in the Constantinople the Queen of cities and much more all their treasures and lute was carried away and scattered and it can found in private collections or in Rome which are plenty of stolen lute over there !! Nothing personal just the facts !!
"Far from being a moribund society..., it (Byzantium) was the greatest, most active and most enduring political organism that the world has yet seen..." - F.M. Powicke, English historian
A fun fact is that the ones that finally defeated the Varangian Guard in open battle was the Normans, themselves of the militaristic, Norse origin.
Normans have jewish ancestors. They changed everything
I like when Harald Hardraad had enough of the empress and took the Varangian gurd to the port, having to fight through several legions to do it, then took the ships necessary and sailed to norway. He then built an army large enough to invade england.
I'm pretty sure Andrew Gough just pre-records a bunch of vauge commentary in a room somewhere and then the editors compile it to match whatever the topic is.
haha thank you - I'm 15 minutes in and it's just a bunch of random clips of violence and 100 different ways of saying, "The Varangians liked fighting". Wow. Thanks. I've learned so much.
Yeah agreed. He's terribly off-putting.
I came to the comment section first about 3 seconds in the video. Ill pay attention to this and return with my own remarks lol..
In what is now Sweden there was a law in the late viking Age made to prevent that to many of the young men went to Mikklagård and joined the Vangarian Guard. It was so popular to join that force for a while that the Swedish king had to do something to keep the best warriors for him self.
I would like to mention that Amon Amarth even has a song about them. "Varyags of Miklagaard."
"Miklagaard has been our home for 20 years or more
We've lent our axes, spears, and swords
In service of the emperor
We are loyal warriors
That's the oath we gave
To protect the emperor even to a violent grave"
Clearly, Harald Hardrada was an out-of-the-box thinker and charismatic leader. He believed in the power of the Skald, the Norse record-keeper/storytellers very much. Probably the main reason we have these tales. It is ironic though that after roaming the eastern Med, that his eventual undoing likely involved inclemently warm weather, former Roman roads (and the English longbow) at the Battle of Stamford Bridge. His force at Stamford Bridge in 1066 had left much of their armor at the boats due to the heat, and had underestimated the speed in which Harald Godwinson's army would arrive from the south via Roman-built roads. Even though Harald H. caught an arrow to the neck and perished with his army, they damaged Harald G.'s army bad enough that they lost their next crucial battle for control of England at Hastings. Even in death, Harald Hardrada's impacts on the western world are felt yet today via the Normans, another Norse-derived culture. The arrival of Haley's Comet in early 1066 was to portent a very eventful year-and did not disappoint.
He was quite a boy wasn't he, fighting for his half brother at 15& escaping afterwards,shows how rich Constantinople must have been that he used his loot to become king of Norway, love his escape from there too, just read a book about him but you get the feeling that there was so much more to tell
Whoops, I really should watch until I comment
Not only did Harald Hardrada believe in the power of the Skald, but was reportedly a poet himself, and according to saga was making up poetry while fighting at Stamford Bridge. Tom Shippey in his book "Laughing shall I die" writes about that.
The Varangian Guard was not only the sole unit under the Emperor’s command that he could trust. They also could teach the rest of the Roman (read: ‘Byzantine’) army and establishment a thing or two about professionalism and integrity
I’m pretty sure Halfdan would’ve graffitied several different places, but none of the other buildings are still standing to this day.
12:55 There actually weren't that many Byzantine Emperors who were assassinated, The main purpose of an emperors "bodyguard' was not to prevent him from being assassinated, it was his private military force paid directly by himself, the emperor. If one of the emperor's vassals rebelled then that vassals soldiers would almost certainly remain loyal to him rather than the emperor. So the Varangian Guard did whatever the emperor required them to do, they did act as a literal bodyguard, even being trusted with the keys to the city while the emperor was away, but they also acted as law enforcement as well, but the main purpose was to act as loyal retainers ready to defend the emperor in case of rebellion which was incredibly common in the Eastern Roman Empire. They were his insurance against the scheming nobility, so they were very well paid and had their own special privileges.
So while assassination was a threat, more emperors were deposed through military coups than assassination. That's the purpose of having a private army rather than lets say Game of Thrones Kings Guard.
Westerners and their "Academia" are trying to represent Orthodox leaders as they are Vatican leaders. Not a word about them destroying, or directly helping destruction of all 3 Orthodox Tzars.
There are suspicions that Basil II's father was assassinated, having died at age 26.
His father ruled for only 4 years.
His father, Basil II's grandfather is suspected of having been assassinated.
Basil was made co-emperor with his brother, both children. As such, their regent Nicephorus Phocas became emperor. He was assassinated.
He was followed by John Tzimiskes, who was suspected of having been assassinated. Not to mention the civil war led by Phocas's relatives.
After Basil II and his brother died, the next emperor was Romanos III..... who was assassinated after ruling for 6 years.
So if assassinations of Byzantine Emperors was rare... it certainly wasn't in the time-period!
@@Valchrist1313 in that time frame how many disloyal vassals tried to rebel? Read what i said more carefully. i didn't say that emperors weren't assassinated, I said that the point of the varangians was not primarily as a literal bodyguard, but his personal private army. So whats your point?
An emperor didnt employ as many Varangians as he possibly could to stand outside his chambers. What about the Varangians of the sea? were they standing guard at night?
Calling them "bodyguards" is not a great description. It may have been more prestigious than referring to them as retainers, but that's what they were. The elite standing/professional troops of the Byzantine Army, paid directly by the emperor, and recruited from outside the empire in order to ensure loyalty to the emperor rather than a noble family.
@@adamwee382 You said 'there weren't that many' implying it was uncommon. Yet, the two predecessors and two successors were likely assassinated.
The video actually does go over the other stuff too!
@@Valchrist1313 No, you're making the assumption and you're imposing it onto me. Read carefully the context of what i've said. I implied that rebellious factions leading armies were statistically more dangerous than assassinations. That does not mean that I said or even implied that assassinations didn't occur, or were even rare.
I was merely stating that calling the Varangians "bodyguards" is misleading, even if that's how they were referred to at the time. No eastern Roman Emperor retained hundreds of Varangians to act as his literal bodyguard.
Nothing you've said contradicts my original argument, which was "The main purpose of an emperors "bodyguard' was not to prevent him from being assassinated, it was his private military force paid directly by himself, the Emperor" So again, and for the last time, i really don't understand your point.
I like the way you name the Byzantium Empire the dark ages...
The East never experienced dark ages like the west...
It was only after the fall of Constantinople and the invasion of the "utman Turk" did the East experience dark ages
Most of the elite and educated East had escaped to the west and Italy after the fall of Byzantium which began the revival or the renaissance of Europe
Byzantine Dark Ages is a historiographical term for the period in the history of the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire, during the 7th and 8th centuries, which marks the transition between the late antique early Byzantine period and the "medieval" middle Byzantine era.
It sounds as though you only have contempt for the Turks.
@@maryamkim1281 I think that the dark ages (and the subsequent lost of independence ) of of the East started the 1204 ( (first sack of the Polis). The crusaders took the wealth and the light of the Empire starting the enlightenment of the West .
In 1081 at Dyrrhachium, the Varangian Guard faced the same person whose feint and charge broke the English shield wall in the Battle of Hastings: Brian of Brittany. The result was very much the same. Although Brian was instrumental in that defeat of Alexios Comnenos, the Emperor's daughter Anna Comnene described Brian as "the most courageous and most honourable of all the Gauls".
Wasnt that her impression of Bohemond?
Where did you find out about that?-I always thought that the main information about Hastings was from the tapestry.
@@ilijas3041 No, her impression of Bohemond was that he was handsome, not that he was a decent human being.
@@howwwwwyyyyy The BT is a primary source, and its principal narrator was Brian's brother Alan Rufus, captain of Duke/King William's household knights.
The longest scene on the BT shows the Breton second-in-command (presumably Brian) assailing the English frontlines (led by Earls Leofwine and Gyrth) from the left (West) while Alan led an assault from the right (East) over water traps.
This video production and sound is epic!! No dull or boring parts!!
Great documentary. Harold was a very interesting person.
Byzantium did not have a Dark Age. As the late Merle E. Severy, Editor, National Geographic, wrote: "The Dark Ages are only dark if you look at Western Europe, for long centuries a back-water: decaying towns, isolated manors, scattered monasteries, squabbling robber barons. In the East blazed the light of Byzantium, studded with cities such as Thessalonica, Antioch, and Alexandria, more cosmopolitan than any Western society before the modern age."
Byzantine Dark Ages is a historiographical term for the period in the history of the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire, during the 7th and 8th centuries, which marks the transition between the late antique early Byzantine period and the "medieval" middle Byzantine era.
That’s right and true !!
True Only Bulgarian Empire Capital Great Preslav is Seccond Constantinople
@@stanbatakarata6081 were and how you come up with that statement ? Really ??
Western Europe suffered the consequences of the Roman Empire and, later, the Catholic Church.
Just a bunch of good ole boys out looking for fun . Ya gotta luv the Vikings. 👍
And theyr woman's 😊
Yeah they were Vikings but they were Russian
Except when they pillage
Andrew Gough- The man of a thousand titles.
I`ve heard of flaming arrows but not flaming sparrows -brilliant-, my neighbours better be nice I got seagulls🤣.
There was no "Dark Age Byzantium". Read what the famous Medieval French crusader wrote about Byzantium: "One could not believe there was so rich a city in all the world. All those who had never seen Constantinople before gazed with astonishment at the city. They had never imagined that anywhere in the world there could be a city like this. They gazed with wonder at its rich palaces and mighty churches, for it was difficult for them to believe that there were indeed so many of them. As they gazed at the length and breadth of that superb city there was not a man, however brave and daring, who did not feel a shudder down his spine." - Geoffrey de Villehardouin
Byzantine Dark Ages is a historiographical term for the period in the history of the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire, during the 7th and 8th centuries, which marks the transition between the late antique early Byzantine period and the "medieval" middle Byzantine era.
Yep in Bulgaria have Seecor Constantinopol.Bulgarian Empire capitals Great Preslav.Seecond Europe Capital in 9-10 century
❤MKM
FANTASTIC RETORT OF KNOWLEDGE ON TOPIC ❤ BRILLIANT AND SOO INFORMATIVE❤
Constantinople was called Miklagard by the Varangians and Vikings.
I am a second generation Swedish American. My Mom's parents came from Sweden. I grew up listening to my grandfather tell stories about our ancestors and their travels. I was lucky enough to go to Sweden with my grandfather. Met my relatives in the village thats been home for generations. Got to be tough to survive a place where bears roam around trying to fstten up for winter.
You should leave Merica & visit Sweden permanently. We'd appreciate it.
@@benparrish672 Why would you tell me to leave the country I am a citizen of?. I love my heritage. My ancestors traveled through the Russians to the Middle East. Fought in the Crusades. My ancestors raised an army to restore Gustav Vasa as King of Sweden. I've traveled all over Europe several times. I love being an American.
You're very lucky to visit Sweden, it's probably beautiful. That's amazing your relatives have been in the same village for generations.
What a jerk
Vikings/norseman+Roman training and equipment = Varangian Guard.
Europeans, we need the Varangian Guard once again, but this time to defend our homelands, Europa.
Watch Europa the last battle and awaken your mind my friend
Exactly, I'm American and I know Europe needs to defend your culture and countries! It's ridiculous what's going on!
J*ws replaced you. It's too late lol
@dinarusso3320 Your a European too.😅😅😅
How old are you? Twelve?
40:00 Only a Scandinavian Viking would come up with that brave plan 😄
"The Brutal Special Forces of Early Medieval Eastern Rome"
Fixed.
That one guy seemed a bit happy when he described the torture.
Were there also joyfull moments in History? Or was there only slaughter end disease?
A child once laughed in what is now the Czech Republic but was then beaten.
😅 that's a question I've often thought about, seems like all doom and gloom .
@@timw6928
Well it WAS the Dark Ages after all
Monty Python says it was all bad.
@@letsdothis9063
Bring out yer dead 💀
Some monumental works regarding the Greek Byzantine Empire by two experts of Byzantine History, include;
Warren Treadgold
“A Concise History of Byzantium”,
“A History of the Byzantine State and Society”,
“Byzantium and Its Army, 284-1081”,
“The Byzantine Revival, 780-842”.
Sir Steven Runciman
“Byzantine Civilization”,
“The Fall of Constantinople 1453”,
“The Great Church in Captivity: A Study of the Patriarchate of Constantinople from the Eve of the Turkish Conquest to the Greek War of Independence”,
“Byzantine Style and Civilization”,
“The Last Byzantine Renaissance”.
All epic. Truly, an academic treasure.
The vikings called Konstantinopel "Mikklegard" (the Big City)
It's Miklagard = Great City
There's a song by a band called Amon Amarth, titled "Varyags of Miklagaard" thats about them haha
The fact that the people in this documentary are demonstrating how they inflict wounds with these weapons, rather than expressing the perspective of being butchered by them, pretty much sums up why we still have wars today. They don't like it up em
The ploy of faking death was not an homage to the Greek Trojan horse. It is far more likely that he remembered one of many famed tales of Ragnar Lothbrok and his sons, as Ragnar did the exact same ploy many years prior to this. Even Netflix managed to put this ploy into the show before leaving the source material very early on and goes full Hollywood. To bad we never got to see any of the very clever ploys of Ivar the boneless in the show.
Interesting how he used the ploy of setting birds on fire several hundred years before Ghengis Khan got the same idea, which might indicate that it probably happened more often than its written down.
😊 that's exactly what I thought, he probably heard about Ragnar doing the same thing!
Using the local birds to burn down the city was a ploy used by St. Olga of Kyiv to finish off the drevlinians. It is most likely while Harald stayed in Kyiv he heard that story and later used the same tactic. Though with any of these tales we can never be certain of what really happened.
we need them on the coasts now
to do, what?
Scandanavia needs them on the coast now!!
“Lush tropical climate” - WTF, it get’s below freezing in Istanbul in winter.
IT gets in the -40 to -50
In Alberta Canada
-5°© to -15°©
Am still in t-shirt outside.
For us Norseman is summertime!. 😂
Sweden and other counties around can get -40c and lower so yeah it’s tropical for them
Great 👍
Bob was here.
Thousands of years and bad boys are still children.
😂
Funny enough I've been watching Vikings Valhalla, I think Harald is well portrayed
The real Harald journey was much more insane. He began his lifelong journey to avenge his brother and reclaim the throne of Norway since he was only 15 years old. His journey was filled with war and battle in many foreign lands. His life was literally one of those protagonist story you would only think existed in movies. He began as a young inexperienced second son return to where his journey began as one of the most battle hardened warriors with cunning political skills.
The last kingdom as well lol
Many of the Varangian Guard later consisted of Anglo-Saxons, who had fled England after the defeat at Hastings by William the Conqueror and the Normans. Around 15 years or so later, Robert Guiscard, his son Bohemond and the Norman army did battle against the Byzantines and the Anglo-Saxon Varangian Guard at the Battle of Dyrrhachiu and gave them a humiliating defeat.
Seems we are at that point where making a history documentary can be what ever you want as long as you can present it skilfully. What a sad time we live in
What's skillful about this crap? The soundtrack is disruptive. The commentary is bullshit.
@@keenannorris3309 If you know how to sell garbage (this video) in a decorative box and people wants to buy it, that's skilful on my list.
@@zeljko612 good point
16:29 😂😂😂😂 hold on what🤯🤯 no you lost me after that. I know for a fact they didn’t have electricity let alone neon signs and tv🤔🤨🤨
So The ruling class of the Kievan Rus were actually Vikings? 😮
yes
Yes Rurick was a Viking noble called by the Slavic nobility to rule over them hence the formation of the Kievan Rus the ancestors of modern Say Russians and Ukrainians.
@@Marcelocostache Belorussians as well....lol
Did everyone miss the part where he says The Grand Prince of Kiev in WHERE????? Ukraine?????? Hey England PHD and so on.....Stop it with these cheap shots they are quiet sad.......for someone of your status.
This means that the Ucranians should rule russia, right?
the birds were like modern day missiles
The Roman vikings aptly describe them. God bless all the northmen who converted and protected our blessed emperors. ☦️
Dark age existed only in western medieval Era. The Greco-roman kingdom falsely called Byzantium had been THE beacon of high culture for 11 centuries!
I learned more from the expert historians in the comment section than tha actual documentary itself.
a great movie! I was particularly impressed by the fact that the authors of the film understand well the difference between Kievan Rus - Ukraine and Mordor, which called itself Russia.
My ancestors were all vikings!!! It's awesome to have viking blood going thru my veins!
Im proud of my scandinavian heritage as well.
Your ancestors were probably farmers. And that's just cholesterol in your veins.
Sailing around causing mischief in little boats 😊
@@mk.4x785or prescription drugs and alcohol 😂
@@mk.4x785duh, Vikings were farmers! What's your point other than trying to be insulting
16:28 lmao, wtf. The Varangian guard were touring around the Red Light district, were they? Apparently they were big fans of the 10th/11th century neon lights!
Fun fact after the Norman invasion of Anglo Saxons England 300 ships fled from the country and headed to join byzantines vrangian guard. It is said that after this soon the majority of their men were Anglo Saxons. Unfortunately thjs is undermined and not acknowledged to the same extent as the viking culture despite contributing just as much.
What a good documentary
I think if I was a Veringian , id use my earnings to build a city and make myself nobility
Or king like Hardrada did
We were known to be big and fearsome. And loyal, bec we are and were.
The history is written by the winners, Im not sure I believe my anchestors were that barbaric😂 like more than other people living in Europe at the time. These kind of
documentaries always exaggerate stuff. Greatings from Norway
The Vikings in the 13th Warrior were Varangians I think.
They weren't Varangians, they were Geats and Danes.
@@dis_f30I thought they were Swedes.
Lots of Anglo Saxons fled to Constantinople and joined the Varangian Guard after William The Conqueror won the Battle of Hastings. It's worth a Google.
Thanks for this! Will check it out
Fascinating subject,thank you.
If anyone's interested in serially hardcore Medieval Scandinavian warfare including the Varangian Guard I strongly recommend Schwerpunkt's relative playlist
u spam this on every vid with ur fake accounts
@@bine35 I know.. I tried watching a couple of his vids and quickly realized he doesn’t actually say anything. Yet makes 2hr long vids on everything
@@MethodMobile
Yeah. I'm starting to get the same impression about his content.
He makes long winded videos and doesn't really explain anything.
Report these bots for spam every chance you have
Give it up man!!!!! Nobody likes your channel.
Come now, the story of the burning sparrows is just ridiculous.
the white flashes, the modern footage makes this less as good as it could have been
Basil? Basil Fawlty? The name Harald Hardrada rings a bell. Didn't we defeat him at the Battle of Stamford Bridge (1066)? No Sparrows (or Magpies) were harmed in the making of this video.
Well Done!
His fortune left him when he tried to invade England, he was defeated and killed by the Anglo-Saxon in the Battle of Stamford Bridge in 1066, the Englo-Saxon King Harold Godwinson was defeated and killed by the Duc of Normandy William the conqueror in the battle of Hastings ....
It’s crazy to me how people have the nerve to cast judgement upon people in history.. like applying modern standards and ideals back then is ridiculous
As an Norwegian I detest these alliegations! ;)
A Greek emperor called Basil, sounds like a longshoreman from Kent. You'd almost be forgiven for thinking that his real name was Basileus. Also it's Hardrada, not Hadrada.
Your 'historical experts' would be outclassed in a grade 5 history lesson...
Very dramatic use of actors and cos-players, though, I give it a 3
They got this wrong they didn't gust kill to kill they killed wishing to be killed in battle. Glory to Valhalla.
I think it would have been better to fight and take as many of the enemy with you as you can. Never surrender. It'll just get you killed.
The guy playing Harald looks corny as hell lol.
Pretty sure Halfdan was the first memelord.
Hardraade = strongheaded. Brits has never ever understood or known much about their northern neighbours. They have their own silly version of history. The illustrations here is wery naive, wery few are capable of recreating the vikings skill level. But if you want to get a glimse, take a closer look at Gannicus in "Spartacus" (2010). Notice how this skilled fighter prefer to move light carrying one sword in each hand, fighting bare wearing no armour or "serk". This fearless fighting-style was later known as "going berserk". Even the "story" about the battle at stamford bridge in 1066 is not correct. the norwegians met an army of normanners first and won the battle. Then when they were on their way back to they`re ships, tired and unprepeared the english king saw his chanse and attacked them when they were tired and not wearing their armour.
Hårderåde "ruthless ruler" or "tough ruler". Take it from a Dane
@@peterlandbo2726 wrong, from a norwegian
300 ships invaded and 24 went home...😅
I bet they weren't as tired as the English were at Hastings, having marched the length of England in a couple of weeks, after Stamford Bridge.
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ It took a 🇳🇴 Norwegian 🇳🇴 King! This documentary gets five stars for getting ALMOST everything right. But it's a load of nonsense that, at least Norwegian and Danish Vikings didn't know how to fight disciplined! They had to have an extreme degree of discipline, because they almost always fought vastly outnumbered abroad. You don't win such battles by running around like headless, leaderless chickens. You needed Brawns AND Brains!
Take it from a descendant of Harald Fairhair!
De prøver å si vi var blodtørstige idioter som springer rundt som hodeløse kyllinger. De vet ingenting om vår historie. Hadde vi hadd samhold og ikke kriget med hverandre hadde vi tatt over Europa.
Special forces, no, skilled pirate goons, yes.
Now were talking i can't wait to watch this one
Geez the over dramatization of documentaries is just silly. 😂😂 I can’t take it.
There is no significant evidence of the origin of the Kievan princes from the Scandinavian dynasties. The name of the first historically known ancestor of Vladimir is Igor. Some claim that this name comes from the Scandinavian Ingvar but maybe also from the West Slavic Igar/Jegar, which translates as hunter. The name of the next prince Svyatoslav has no analogues among the Scandinavians at all. You will agree that there is no such precedent in the world for conquerors to call their royal descendants in the second generation by the names of the conquered peoples. And the name Vladimir itself is of Gothic origin. Among the Scandinavians, the name Vladimir would appear many centuries later. The myth of the Danish origin of the Kievan princes was created by the princes of Moscow in order to correct their genealogy and separate from the Tatar origin. And then in Europe, Moscow grants were used to create myths, distorting the history of Eastern Europe.
PS: The second historical absurdity is that the number of soldiers sent by Vladimir to Constantinople was 6000 men. Think about it, SIX thousand without much damage to his own safety. For the Scandinavian peoples of the IX-X centuries, this is an unthinkable number. And this was at a time when the Vikings did not have enough strength to cope with England where were rich, but weak Christian states.
Almost a century later, Norman's army, reinforced by the French and Britons in the number of 7,500 to 10,000, defeated 8,000 English troops of Harold II. This is, so, for a comparison of forces.
By the way, Harold's II daughter, Gytha of Wessex, became the wife of Vladimir's great-grandson
Another myth about the path of the "Varangians to the Greeks" does not stand up to criticism. From the nearest river of the Baltic water basin to the Dnieper is about 40 kilometers.I would like to look at the fools driving sea drakars FORTY kilometers through swamps and forest thickets
I am not trying to prove that the Scandinavian warriors did not serve in the imperial guard. At different times, representatives of different peoples served there. But, has anyone wondered about the origin of the word varang? Var in one of the dialects of the ancient Slavic meant a blade, and varang meant a swordsman
Known in Byzantium as, 'The Emperor's wine bags'.
"Dark Age" is a misnomer...
Their cousins the Normans ran them out.
3:06 There was no Ukraine in the 11th century.
*he was not Vladimir, and his father not Sviatoslav, but his father was Sveinald Ingvarsson, and his mother was Helga and not Olga, read the Viking Sagas, and you will see your Russian rulers over there, with their original, non slavic, germanic names, thank you ver, much!* ❤
It didn't hurt that the norse were much larger people than the Mediterraneans, Arabs, Kurds, etc.
How can this man be so certain that the Vikings were Tatooed? There very little to no proof that they all had tatoos. It makes good TV that's all.
😂 So who were the inventers of the shieldwall?
English or Scandinavians?
Greeks? Romans? Hopelites?
@@spacewater7
Round shields?
Angle and Saxon origins are Scandinavian
@@christopherwiles543 the Angols, Saxons, Jutes, and Geats(Goths) were Germanic peoples. Scandinavians are also Germanic. They originated from Germania, not Scandinavia.
@@jacquelinevanderkooij4301it depends on the form of shield wall you're referring to. The Greco-Roman Phalanx was created by the Myceneans, was perfected by the Spartan hoplites, and subsequently spread to the rest of the Helenic world, where it was adopted by the Romans.
The shield wall you're likely referring to was created by the Jutes and Geats, and perfected by the Norse and Danes. It spread to the British Isles by way of Norse invasion, and was adopted by English armies to combat the invading Norse vikingr. The Norse eventually assimilated into English society, becoming knights and soldiers, meaning their tactics and strategies were folded into the English way of doing battle. It was very much the same everywhere that the Norse landed.
dark age byzantium - macedonian reneissance 😐
Best Roman recovery in over 500 years The Macedonian Dinasty manage to double the size of the Eastern Roman Empire, at that time the Empire was at its peak an army of over 125000 strong powerful economy and stretching from Italy to Syria!.
hmm, not keen on the idea of incorporating modern terms like 'black ops' into medieval history videos.
Nobody asked. Make your own documentary then.
its an old show that did same with samurai etc describing the similarities, u've always had mass troops and then individual highly specialized roles
Putting a thumb down is not enough, remember to click "don't recommend channel"
Where do you think the concept of black ops units comes from?😂 Modern militaries didn't just magically get inspired to create small groups of highly-skilled, highly trained, covert operatives. Ancient armies had recon scouts, demolitions specialists called sappers, assassins, spies, espionage experts, and even small units.of shovk troops that were the ancient version of SEAL teams. Using modern common parlance to convey a thought or concept isn't new, nor is it inappropriate. It is, however, pretentious as hell, to think you have the authority to judge everyday common vernacular. Hop on out of the saddle, and give the high horse a break.
@@RickR69 How can you tell you are about to watch a stupid useless video about some elite military unit? They use the term "special forces" in the first 2 minutes. Because as we all know "special forces" operate in the palace and charge in the hundreds, riding horses.
Vlad was Kievan Rus not Ukrainian
Not even Kievan
It was called just Rus
Vaeringi old norse means to pledge , or to take an oath , , this is where the word varangian comes from,...
Not TRUE I have experiment myself the last part..
We will protect the Emperor of the south :D.
NICKWELL :)
Without any antibiotics how did they survive any wound
They typically burned the wound with a red hot piece of iron. Stop the bleeding & disinfect the wound
Very, ... _Discovery Channel,_ by which I mean complete shite.
Putting a thumb down is not enough, remember to click "don't recommend channel"
Meager evidence for their existence. They were kept as oddities and a Greek Woman defeated one of them in hand to hand combat.
Where did you read about that? genuinely interested
@@howwwwwyyyyy I read about the fact that they were never used in actual warfare. the same as Arabs kept Sub Saharan guards.
Also, one of the Varangians tried to rape a Greek Woman and the Hellen woman handed his Varangian Buttocks back to him.
do a basic Google search and informed yourself.
So.....am I the one confused about the definition of prototypical?
Less than 7 minutes in, and you're already historically fictional.
Not wasting my time.
6:00 i farted.
*SS Varangia of the Dark ages, if we can say so, the notorious war raged berserkers...lol*
I'm warrior and soldier boy 😎 I'm strong 😂 we will stan and battle fight and death and honour