Thank you so much for the video! I think when people really work with AI instead of letting AI work for them, we can create many wonderful and unique things full of life. I want to learn this, and thanks to your videos I already learned much!
Greatly appreciate that fact of Intellectual property being highlighted which is questioned less or wven ignored by masses. As I have been wondering 1/ How or where did all these AI tools get data to show results for users without source of data being displayed or cridets shared to the content owners 2/ If no source is provided, have all the data showcased being generated and taught to the machine/AI by the AI Tool companies These are important questions to be answered, cause untill date google or other search engines used to Answer the question using the links or the source of website i.e. guide individual to respective websites or content. (Understanding the fact, their were some concerns which I might have not known) But with the AI tools, It would be such a waste IF the content creators time and effort for their research to share their knowledge with the masses being stolen in one or the other ways without their knowledge or respective credits being paid. I could be wrong with my comments, but these are my honest questions...
These are good questions! Where do they get data? LLMs need extremely large data sets to work. ChatGPT, for instance, uses Wikipedia, books, open research libraries, official governmental documents, media articles, public forums, Common Crawl data (nonprofit web scrapper that basically saves the Internet), and many more data sources. So, yes. AI companies use somebody else’s work to train LLMs. And they don’t provide references to sources (unless the LLM compiles the response after a live search on the Internet during the conversation). Could they provide such references? With the way LLMs work today, most likely not. An individual response doesn’t draw from a particular source of information. An LLM doesn’t have a catalog of articles and books. In very simple terms, it tries to find the most statistically appropriate word that goes next, given the context. When you hear Winston, what last name comes to your mind first? If it’s Churchill, can you trace it back to some particular page you’ve read about him or history class? You’ve probably heard the name so often that it’s just a part of common knowledge without a specific source. Having processed billions of web pages, books, and articles, LLMs develop a similar logic. Is it equal to stealing? That’s a hot debate. Copying and slightly rewriting the work of a single historian on Winston Churchill is stealing. Generalizing the information from millions of pages, articles, and books about the prime minister? Well, that's what people argue about. We’ll definitely make another video on GenAI ethics 🙂
@@AltexSoft Great insights , Thanks for the response. If they do provide Source, I think it would just be another Web search but more so with detailed answer with data for the question.
It is hallucinate because mistakes in calculations create this hallucinations. It is possible to recognize the start of hallucination in line, for find mistake and start think about it and consequences
People will lose there jobs but it's nothing like we picture. If we can't work then how we gonna buy all this AI shit? That's 1st grade business. How are so many missing that part. AI has helped me make an extra 100k in the past 3.5 months. Don't over think this time in our lives. Your not AI. I love this shit
Thank you so much for the video! I think when people really work with AI instead of letting AI work for them, we can create many wonderful and unique things full of life. I want to learn this, and thanks to your videos I already learned much!
Impressive .. This video is under rated comparing the high value content to the number of views.
Great. Please share new videos on application AI in Web3, Blockchain.
Greatly appreciate that fact of Intellectual property being highlighted which is questioned less or wven ignored by masses.
As I have been wondering
1/ How or where did all these AI tools get data to show results for users without source of data being displayed or cridets shared to the content owners
2/ If no source is provided, have all the data showcased being generated and taught to the machine/AI by the AI Tool companies
These are important questions to be answered, cause untill date google or other search engines used to Answer the question using the links or the source of website i.e. guide individual to respective websites or content. (Understanding the fact, their were some concerns which I might have not known)
But with the AI tools, It would be such a waste IF the content creators time and effort for their research to share their knowledge with the masses being stolen in one or the other ways without their knowledge or respective credits being paid.
I could be wrong with my comments, but these are my honest questions...
These are good questions!
Where do they get data?
LLMs need extremely large data sets to work. ChatGPT, for instance, uses Wikipedia, books, open research libraries, official governmental documents, media articles, public forums, Common Crawl data (nonprofit web scrapper that basically saves the Internet), and many more data sources.
So, yes. AI companies use somebody else’s work to train LLMs. And they don’t provide references to sources (unless the LLM compiles the response after a live search on the Internet during the conversation).
Could they provide such references?
With the way LLMs work today, most likely not. An individual response doesn’t draw from a particular source of information. An LLM doesn’t have a catalog of articles and books. In very simple terms, it tries to find the most statistically appropriate word that goes next, given the context. When you hear Winston, what last name comes to your mind first? If it’s Churchill, can you trace it back to some particular page you’ve read about him or history class? You’ve probably heard the name so often that it’s just a part of common knowledge without a specific source.
Having processed billions of web pages, books, and articles, LLMs develop a similar logic.
Is it equal to stealing?
That’s a hot debate. Copying and slightly rewriting the work of a single historian on Winston Churchill is stealing. Generalizing the information from millions of pages, articles, and books about the prime minister? Well, that's what people argue about.
We’ll definitely make another video on GenAI ethics 🙂
@@AltexSoft Great insights , Thanks for the response.
If they do provide Source, I think it would just be another Web search but more so with detailed answer with data for the question.
It is hallucinate because mistakes in calculations create this hallucinations. It is possible to recognize the start of hallucination in line, for find mistake and start think about it and consequences
Generative AI is changing the world!... It looks like lots of jobs will get displaced!
Intelectuelle 3:44
People will lose there jobs but it's nothing like we picture. If we can't work then how we gonna buy all this AI shit? That's 1st grade business. How are so many missing that part. AI has helped me make an extra 100k in the past 3.5 months. Don't over think this time in our lives. Your not AI. I love this shit
wow
sss