@@tylerc4229they already are rivaling that of Toyota’s quality. *gm’s* quality has gone UP over the last 5-7 years tremendously and I still see them improving upon it with each new refresh/redesign they release. One of the best ways to tell is to inspect their cheapest/entry models. The build quality of the new Chevy Trax LS is immaculate, night and day compared to a comparable *gm* 7 years ago. Materials are cheap but the *quality* genuinely impressed me. It only gets better from the Trax as you move up in the lineup.
Gm looks good but has quality issues, FIL has the at4x aev and the bumper wont clip in correctly on one side gm is aware but dont care because they only shipped 15 of them nation wide, its frame related, nowhere to clip it in
Ben, as always, thanks for a quality video. I particularly like that you mention payload for the individual trucks that you feature. Thank you! LOL, beautiful/capable off-road oriented truck. I want 4WD/AWD, but don’t need that much capability, particularly how it adversely affects payload (I tow a small camper). I am impressed with the new Canyons/Colorados. I would opt for the Elevation 4WD (with some additional options) or the AT4.
If I were in the market I’d wait for the new Ranger Raptor, from what Ive been hearing it will be superior but only a side by side comp will prove that out.
Would be interesting to see how the Ranger Raptor is for driving. You could get it for $10k less and get 430 hp, but I’ll be surprised if you can get the Ranger for MSRP. The AT4X is definitely more aggressive looking than the Ranger Raptor. But $66k for a small pickup is getting insane.
I think the key buying decision is who marks up less. My local Ford dealer marks up every Raptor to nosebleed territory. They want 118k for a Bronco Raptor. Crazy.
@@2011buddyleemy mistake. I got HP and Torque numbers backwards. But 405 is still quite a bit more than the AT4X. And that was why I said they will probably have. Them marked up. Local dealer marked up Tremors F150s $10k, they Ranger Raptor will be more than that.
That white interior, i just can't. I really like this truck but that interior is only concept worthy IMO, not for real life. Interested in anyone's experience with it, how does the white stand up to everyday life?
Sweet review as always ... like how ya just get down and show things ... for the vehicle, it's a solid midsize truck to have fun in, but at $66k I know there are other options even in full size trim.
I wanted to buy one of these, the front grill looks awesome - had to move to the Colorado ZR2 because of the nicer looking interior - I just didn't like the look of the white and red interior - in person it looked kind of cheap.
Looks are Subjective, i like the look of this truck but i also like the look of the ranger. In my mind when it comes down to it that turbo 4 isnt going to be able to hang with that turbo 6. However it plays out that colorado clone toyota will have to stick to competition with trucks missing a front locker
AT4X doesn't come close to comparing to the Ranger Raptor. Looks great minus those rims...Can't wait to see the AT4X AEV. I'm only hesistant because of the 4 cyclinder turbo. Much rather have a V6 turbo... Now if you want to use a midsize truck like a real truck then sure...AT4X edges out the Ranger Raptor. Looks better too...But performance wise not close...
Maybe they should have made the door armrests red and put white in the door panel. You know it's going to get dirty and will not look to good pretty quickly.
Not even close to a raptor. The interior looks nice, though, but too much white... it will get dirty quickly. I don't like the minimal space on the backseat area. I wouldn't pay 66k for this truck.
Nah it's more comparable to the base model ford maverick. Every car reviewer lately is comparing a factory equipped slightly offroad capable truck to the raptor lately😂
My videos are slow burns over the course of 1 to 2 years. It’s not as exciting as getting tons of views right away, but it’s way more stable long term.
Best looking midsize hands down. Would love this as my next vehicle.
@@2011buddylee in this day and age what new vehicles d o n ' t have problems 😭
Awesome truck, I want one so bad! Thanks for reviewing one of my requests Ben!
That interior is super nice
Ford and Toyota can’t compete with these folks styling. It’s a no brainer!! Best designed truck inside and out in the entire segment hands down. 🔥💨
Styling for sure goes to GM. They really stepped it up in interior and exterior refinement.
Bull. GMC government motors and China
They just need Toyotas quality control and they’d be unstoppable
@@tylerc4229they already are rivaling that of Toyota’s quality. *gm’s* quality has gone UP over the last 5-7 years tremendously and I still see them improving upon it with each new refresh/redesign they release.
One of the best ways to tell is to inspect their cheapest/entry models. The build quality of the new Chevy Trax LS is immaculate, night and day compared to a comparable *gm* 7 years ago. Materials are cheap but the *quality* genuinely impressed me. It only gets better from the Trax as you move up in the lineup.
Gm looks good but has quality issues, FIL has the at4x aev and the bumper wont clip in correctly on one side gm is aware but dont care because they only shipped 15 of them nation wide, its frame related, nowhere to clip it in
Ben, as always, thanks for a quality video. I particularly like that you mention payload for the individual trucks that you feature. Thank you! LOL, beautiful/capable off-road oriented truck. I want 4WD/AWD, but don’t need that much capability, particularly how it adversely affects payload (I tow a small camper). I am impressed with the new Canyons/Colorados. I would opt for the Elevation 4WD (with some additional options) or the AT4.
Still would love to them have a special addition with the 3.0 diesel. That would be a incredible truck.
The last generation had deisel :)
Order was accepted. Just waiting for mine to be built.
If I were in the market I’d wait for the new Ranger Raptor, from what Ive been hearing it will be superior but only a side by side comp will prove that out.
You have it listed as a 2024 but the one you reviewed was a 2023 -- regardless, nice truck!
Would be interesting to see how the Ranger Raptor is for driving. You could get it for $10k less and get 430 hp, but I’ll be surprised if you can get the Ranger for MSRP. The AT4X is definitely more aggressive looking than the Ranger Raptor. But $66k for a small pickup is getting insane.
This one has 10k in extras attached to it. I got mine a few months back without for 56k. Absolutely love it
I think the key buying decision is who marks up less. My local Ford dealer marks up every Raptor to nosebleed territory. They want 118k for a Bronco Raptor. Crazy.
@@weirdshibainuagreed. Our local Ford dealer was marking up F250s around $10j and Tremor versions around $20k
@@2011buddyleemy mistake. I got HP and Torque numbers backwards. But 405 is still quite a bit more than the AT4X. And that was why I said they will probably have. Them marked up. Local dealer marked up Tremors F150s $10k, they Ranger Raptor will be more than that.
@@bobdennis4801 sounds like the insane markups are Ford and Stellantis issues.
That white interior, i just can't. I really like this truck but that interior is only concept worthy IMO, not for real life.
Interested in anyone's experience with it, how does the white stand up to everyday life?
Sweet review as always ... like how ya just get down and show things ... for the vehicle, it's a solid midsize truck to have fun in, but at $66k I know there are other options even in full size trim.
saw one in person yesterday wasnt impressed zr2 better for less $ white touch points in the interior is dumber than piano black
The white kills it for me
They should've kept the at4 color scheme maybe change the brown for an olive green or some other militaristic color
White seats for an off roader is bold
Very nice 😊this summer I see how great it is off road 😀 ❤
I wanted to buy one of these, the front grill looks awesome - had to move to the Colorado ZR2 because of the nicer looking interior - I just didn't like the look of the white and red interior - in person it looked kind of cheap.
Looks are Subjective, i like the look of this truck but i also like the look of the ranger. In my mind when it comes down to it that turbo 4 isnt going to be able to hang with that turbo 6. However it plays out that colorado clone toyota will have to stick to competition with trucks missing a front locker
AT4X doesn't come close to comparing to the Ranger Raptor. Looks great minus those rims...Can't wait to see the AT4X AEV. I'm only hesistant because of the 4 cyclinder turbo. Much rather have a V6 turbo...
Now if you want to use a midsize truck like a real truck then sure...AT4X edges out the Ranger Raptor. Looks better too...But performance wise not close...
how come you dont say how big the tires are?33 or 35?
Nice truck!!
I honestly prefer the AT4s interior over the AT4X.
100% agreed with you. I don't like the White interior. Its get dirty very easily. If its all black like AT4, I am down with it.
Maybe they should have made the door armrests red and put white in the door panel. You know it's going to get dirty and will not look to good pretty quickly.
Great Review . Midsize at $66K+ wow.. If ford can actually build the Raptor Ranger - Faster, better and far less expensive. Cool truck though
$66k for a Canyon. 😂. That SOUNDS and performs like that! For an average APR of 5%! I refuse to conform.
Are you in Canada or the US?
Very cool looking truck but the sticker price is a doozy 😅
The new Tacoma has some serious competition, the Canyon looks great. I bet the AEV edition is going to look tough.
that dealer lot has a massive amount of trade in vehicles doesn't it
I really hate the seats with the white design
67K dollars and it's a 4 cylinder?
Gmc keep on building awesome truck it's a good truck to have fun with it
GMC government motors and China
Almost 67k. What a joke
Not even close to a raptor. The interior looks nice, though, but too much white... it will get dirty quickly. I don't like the minimal space on the backseat area. I wouldn't pay 66k for this truck.
It's a 2023, even the sticker says it (7:05). No edition1 in 2024
16 MPG
WTF
I am eyeing the 2024 Honda Ridgeline Black edition in Radiant Red Metallic with match red interior accents .
$60k...and a manual rear window?..🤯
And manual fold mirrors 🙄
Nah it's more comparable to the base model ford maverick.
Every car reviewer lately is comparing a factory equipped slightly offroad capable truck to the raptor lately😂
GM has messed up those steps where they show 4 for each door but had been delivering trucks with only 2 for the front.
For 66k I'll take the Tacoma or even upgrade to the Silverado.
Better than the new 24 Tacoma lol
Not better than a raptor
Certainly looks better and definitely has technology that’s leaps and bounds above even the most expensive Ford money can buy. 😂
GMC government motors and China
GMC government motors and China
I think its by far better than ranger raptor yes!
Raptor is so ugly
👍💖👍
16mpg's thats pretty bad
Whàt??? No quadra-steer,like the denali,no deal! Especially if im droppin that much cheddar!
Not even close to a raptor 🥴
Hell no . Raptor is better .
Too much money for a lame 4 cylinder no way this will take on the Raptor Ranger
Garbage
Motor
Car
GMC government motors and China
Another clickbait title to get views. I thought Ben was better than this
Don’t buy from National!!!!!
Nah. Raptor is going to better.
This guy has 340k subs and puts out 4-5 videos a week, but only 4 videos saw 20k views in the 4-5 weeks. Sus.
He puts out consistently good content. Not everyone is interested in every car he reviews.
What’s sus about that? Just curious
My videos are slow burns over the course of 1 to 2 years. It’s not as exciting as getting tons of views right away, but it’s way more stable long term.