Theodore Roosevelt did spend a portion of his life working and investing in North Dakota on his ranch near Medora. He's wasn't a coddled baby who had never lifted a finger.
@@ricardocantoral7672 Your right, he was a Freemason.. I was thinking about Taft, he was in skull & bones.. Fun fact Pinochet was also a member of skull and bones. Look it up.
“I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.” ~ Woodrow Wilson
I love the judge, and agree fully - but to say that TR "never had to get his fingernails dirty" like Wilson is unfair, and incorrect. After the death of his wife and mother (on the same day), TR went out west and worked as a cowboy for more than a year. He actually worked. Physical labor. Also, TR actually fought in the Spanish American War. He went through boot camp (as an officer, granted) and he rode a horse at least partially up the Sa Juan Heights, but he was in the thick of the fight, exposed to danger. He had real-world experience to go along with his academic background. True, he never ran a SUCCESSFUL business and probably never had an appreciation for just how hard that is to do...
Yes, but he did not have to, and that is the point. A year long voluntary sabbatical undertaken to invigorate and restore one’s spirits doesn’t illustrate the expression about having to get dirt under your fingernails. One could argue it illustrates its opposite. The judge is talking about wealth and privilege-needing to risk personal wealth in order to get a return on that investment, he says-not the mildly macho stuff you mention.
@@fredfood5204 Of course Roosevelt should not be considered part of the working class but he did the hard work required when he attempted to become a cattle baron. Roosevelt would have never won the respect of genuine rough neck, cowboys if he didn't get his hands dirty. He may not have been born in grinding poverty but believe you me, he worked hard as hell. He never took it easy.
Also, between Wilson and TR gave us the birth cert and social security. A way for modern enslavement as Wilson’s own words say “they will register their biological property”. That is us!!!! These two presidents were elites and sold us out. Two criminals along with Taft as a chief justice allowed it to happen. They trampled the constitution and took our natural law away and the justice department allowed it. Why? Because it was a one two check mate when they placed criminal Taft in that position. My opinion is that they all knew each other very well and what is written about them is fake. They gave the public a show and behind doors they were eating at the same table. Just like it happens today.
Andrew Napolitano never disappoints. Logical, rational, informed. Hard to argue against someone who is so demonstrably right. He's a great and cogent voice for liberty.
"When the voters recognize that the public treasury has become a public picnic, they will only send to Washington those who will give them the biggest piece of the pie." Brilliant
Nullification is needed now more than ever. It is time we recognize our power to ignore the fed and go our own way. If states can resist federal marijuana laws, we can resist more laws than just that.
@@vunuxbuku5212 That takes being educated, and look who's educating our children: a public school system run by government. If people are in such a mood to abolish and dismantle stuff, how about starting with a public school system that teaches students down to what benefits the public schools -- statism. Socialism. Union labor. Marxism. Funded by wealth generated by, and confiscated from, individuals. The public schools clearly have failed to lift impoverished students out of poverty, and in fact has the same incentive government has to keep the impoverished impoverished. Civics stopped being taught in 1970 in our public schools and you see the end result -- an uneducated electorate that doesn't have the first clue how self-government in a constitutional republic is supposed to operate. And that's fine with both the public schools and government in general. They don't WANT the voters to know how this is supposed to work, because it would assure that 90% of the people the voters have elected to office would lose their jobs.
You forgot Lincoln and Franklin Roosevelt. Generation after generation of the people including ourselves are also to blame for allowing such cancers to grow and spread within the system.
The constitution 'somehow' I'll tell you exactly how and when. the "federal government" shall be known as a federal corporation". Act of Congress on February 21, 1871 (the day homesteading or right to stake a claim became camping and illegal)
Taft was appointed chief justice in 1921 by Harding. Roosevelt died in 1919. Judge Nap lost all credibilty with me when he stated that Dr. Ford sounds credible.
Taft was a huge screw up. He screwed up his governance of the Philippines and his presidency. Roosevelt brought the United States into years of prosperity through strength, and stopped WWI from happening 10 years early in 1904 when Japan defeated Russia in a short naval battle
I think Wilson did go a bit too far, but Roosevelt was only trying to limit the power of those who were as powerful or more powerful than the government
With his “moderate reform” approach he was also trying to keep who he saw as dangerous radicals like William Jennings Bryan, Eugene V. Debs and Woodrow Wilson from being able to use the situation to come to power and make even more sweeping changes that could disrupt societal balance.
But in doing so, it started the growth of the federal government and see what it is now. Would the weather have the people have the power of the government?
Judge. You are a low stern voice in a room full of jackals. I can hear you perfectly clear and so many of us listen carefully to your every word. Great interview. God bless from TEXAS!!
Thomas Jefferson, the president who Napolitano has so much admiration for, went against his own beliefs about the national debt and arguably violated the constitutional powers of the presidency when he made the Louisiana Purchase. Where is the outrage for Jefferson?
Daniel Ryan And the expansionism westward with the Lewis-Clarke expedition that he had funded by the means of Alexander Hamilton's financial plan/bank (I thought Jefferson opposed Hamilton?) - the entire ordeal of expansionism is for bigger government, a Federalist move, I thought Jefferson was an anti-federalist? No word from the judge. That being said, there are pros/cons to both Wilson and Roosevelt's presidency. Roosevelt might have unconstitutionally 'stolen' land (umm, something all our founding fathers did), but it also preserved many national parks and natural wonders that would have been swapped for industry/cities. He might have started the FBI, which has done some horrible things, but has also cracked down on many crimes. Wilson, might have arrested people for what they said about WW1 (Jon Adams, another founding father he hasn't scrutinized), did the exact same thing with the Alien and Sedition act. Yet, Wilson still lead the country into ideas of creating the United Nations with his initial ideas of the League of Nations, after WW1 ended. I see there presidency with nuances, the judge seems to be taking a very rigid stance yet very selective in the presidents he wants to condemn.
Daniel Ryan Yup, never mentioned the Whiskey Rebellion, The Alien & Sedition acts, the unconstitutional Embargo Act which wasn't approved by congress during Jefferson's presidency, the horrible declaration of war against the British that we were defeated in the War of 1812 under Madison, The Trail of Tears/Indian removal act under Andrew Jackson, etc. There's numerous. He cannot possibly favor the founding fathers when they weren't perfect humans. yet criticize later presidents. And this is coming from someone who respects most of the ideas/things the founders did.
+Daniel Ryan Jefferson ALSO said that debt was ok, as long as it's paid up in the same term. As for the Louisiana Purchase, Article IV, section 3: "The Congress shall have power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory or other property belonging to the United States." Also when several states threatened to secede over the purchase, Jefferson never called out federal troops and declared that they couldn't; on the contrary he said "if any state wishes to separate, i have no hesitation in saying let us separate."
Yes. The 1 percent that I disagree is that he said Taft was appointed by Wilson. He was not. He was appointed by fellow Republican Warren G. Harding, one of the 20th century's only good presidents.
I still find Theodore Roosevelt as one of the best Presidents we have ever had, also the First President Candidate to openly support women's right to vote, and even though he had wealth when he was born he made his own way by having his crowed hour in the Spanish American War with his Rough riders, I feel that judge kind of down play Theodore as person.
bob higgs He did, he isn't seeing his presidency with any nuance, just a rigid stance. If he approaches every president that has ever existed with that same consistency, he wouldn't like any president that's ever existed.
A lot of commenters going nuts over the judge's treatment of T.R. here, but you have to separate two things: the man of great courage and personality, and the president who often ignored the Constitution to do whatever he thought was good for the people. T.R. was a great character in American history, with a life full of excitement, vigor, and personal tragedy. However, he did not govern as a strict constructionist. The Panama Canal, the creation of the FBI, the setting aside of public lands to be National Parks, etc., here was a man who had a huge vision for his country, and he'd do whatever he felt was right, the Constitution being beside the point. Conservatives who decried Obama's constant use of executive orders (and rightly so) have to back up and look at what T.R. did (and most importantly, how he did it) with the same objectivity. Whether you like what he did or not, did he have the authority, or did he just do whatever he wanted to do, the Law of the Land be damned? Personally, I like T.R. However, as a Constitution lover, I may like many of T.R.'s accomplishments, but those were things Congress should have done, or they were things that shouldn't have been done at all under the Constitution. He wasn't our worst president by far, but he certainly wasn't the best if you like limited government and a strict interpretation of the Constitution. At least he wasn't Wilson, whom I would put in the ranks of the five worst presidents in American history, along with the likes of Buchanan, Carter, and Obama. Now, some very interesting men to study in the presidency are Washington, Monroe, and Polk. I wish more people knew more about these men as president. But the last two aren't nearly as flashy as T.R., so they get little notice. Men of character rarely do.
There's some people I like, but if those same folks tampered with the Constitution I might even consider them traitors to our nation. People who steal and then use that stolen wealth generously are still thieves. I always knew something was off about Ted. I suppose his actions and the actions of others may not be treason, but they definitely unintentionally helped the enemies of the US. They also broke the law and violated the US Constitution which is sacred to those who love their freedom. Something tells me that his actions and the actions of others have directly opened the door to tyrannical forces, whomever they are. I appreciate your insight. Do you have anything more you would like to add? Especially in light of the current situation where we have massive amounts of foreign influence and aggressiveness? Thanks 👍
I'm a constitutionalist, I believe the Constitution means what it says or as written. I'm a big fan of the Judge in his defense of the Constitution and his criticism of the federal govt for ignoring it, both parties.
We only have 1/3 of our Constitutional Republic left. God, this bothers me. These kind of people always know better than anyone else especially how they ought to live. And here all this time I thought T.R. was a great man.
What this man says from 8:50 onwards is EXACTLY what's happening in my country, Argentina, nowadays. If you what to know where welfare leads, take a look at my country.
And don't forget Lincoln when he suspended the writ of habeas corpus against the ruling of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Roger B. Taney.Lincoln simply ignored the order.
Not trying to set politics aside here, but looking at pictures of Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft and then researching their political careers, these two men look like the same individual. Only a few slight changes in appearance and this lineage may still be present today. Scary thought considering the political records. I could be wrong, but either way the Judge always has an interesting view.
I believe it happened before that, when they took our states republic constitutions and replaced them with State of ... constitutions. They issued birth certificates with "legal" names. Applications in Texas the VS109 states "MOTHERS LEGAL NAME" "CHILDS LEGAL NAME" a legal name is something you give a thing, like a corporation or a business. In the 1840's or so Texas ceded SOME of its lands to the United States for the purpose of erecting military reservations. Babies legal names are Registered and parents are issued "Certificates" as proof of their registration. In order to play in the quasi public/private field of quasi government banks such as the federal reserve and all its quasi government creations you have to show proof of your legal entity - which is not really you. Back when the constitutions were authorized by the people they said, we the people of the Republic of Texas... now days they don't say that. In the congressional record of about 1864 it shows that Mr. COWAN asked Lincoln WHO were the people and Lincoln said there were two definitions according to his attorney - 1. the people (democracy) and 2 the people of congress (aristocracy). Either way they have made it de facto when Lincoln placed the states into districts and put them under military control and making them into legal identities instead of lawful creations of the people.
Interesting. Do you suppose those secret devil worshipping societies actually exist? I've heard some pretty convincing rumors but not much of anything else. I appreciate you sharing your wisdom. 👍
the judge is always spotlighting the common mans welfare system, yet rarely discusses the endless corporate welfare system this country was built on off the backs of the american workers
The name Gillespie is related to the word episcopal or "bishop," and means "servant of the bishop." It's a Greek-Gaelic hybrid surname of gille (devotee) and espie (bishop). The comment that neither the Irishman or the Italian gentleman discussing Woodrow Wilson & Theodore Roosevelt would have been admitted to white institutions was noteworthy.
"Democracy should be a break on unbridled greed and power. Because capitalism, like a fire can turn from a good servant, into an evil master." - Bill Moyer “When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes. Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency, their sole object is gain.” Napoleon Bonaparte.
TR was a necessary force (his actions were for the greater good)...dangerous in the wrong hands. Definitely not comfortable with the bully pulpit in today’s climate but necessary for the time even though not perfectly done the man excelled and will forever be revered.
It terrible, why people telling the truth got fire?! Judge Napolitano telling the truth and they fire him! Is this a new law? I think he right and he is straight telling the truth! And why judge Napolitano he got fire? Is this a New Law?
I do sometimes, but he rants a bit too much for my taste. I like Nap's demeanor, his Libertarian view, and I haven't seen any evidence that he doesn't know what he's talking about.
The Judge is right and I think just like him. A true catholic. I am not so much a true catholic but I believe in the judges moral values on natural law and common sense.
Hang on, social security is my money they take every check, and they decide the terms I get a penny or not. They stole my mother's entire social security. Disgusting.
I think that the convention of states article five of American constitution for correction too the federal government. This is what our founding fathers wanted to do prevent tyranny.
just because the FEderal reserve is abused doesn't mean it was intended to be abused. Altho Milton Friedman said the Federal reserve should be abolished....
I have used some of these programs in my life and was grateful for them.... by worked as hard and fast as I could to get off of them and did. Unfortunately many don't. And when the $Jack runs out... our perfect little Utopian society that we have tried to build in vain will crumble.. and its coming! Its sad.. but it is coming.
One thing I have to bitch about to Napolitano, TR may have had it easy, but he was one of a few of the elites that would have been just as happy to fight in whichever class he was born in... TR forced himself to do things that gave him experience of the middle and lower classes!
he wants to go back to the days when you had to ask for permission from congress to start a new governmental department and when you wouldn't be punished for saying something the president didn't like
I've listened to it about 3 times and I learn something new each time. The man was prophetic. Do you suppose these horrible unconstitutional blunders are the main entry point for our foreign adversaries? I think it plays a large role but I'm inexperienced when it comes to these tricky situations. I believe other nations are facilitating our suicide. They want us to fall down so they won't have to fight us face to face.
@@alexashworth3119 I never received a notification for your comment. I'm now watching this clip again, and noticed your reply. As a political scientist myself, I discovered our Founders created a ZERO PARTY SYSTEM. See Hamilton No 09, Madison No 10 (Federalist Papers). The Torrie/Whig parties from the 175 year British Colonial America resurrected and rebranded themselves as Democrats and Whig/Republicans. The political party era in US history officially began in 1829 with Andrew Jackson. Jackson privatized banking, initiated Gunboat Diplomacy in Asia to protect British/American opium trade to China. And Jackson began breaking the Indian Treaties. It has been a Trail of Tears ever since for all Americans, not just natives. FDR's grandfather, Warren Delano Jr, was the premier US opium smuggler to China during the 1830s, working thru Russell and Company NYC. Warren Delano Jr was a financial supporter in establishing the Democrat party. Roosevelt's were a banking cartel to wash the money.
@@PubliusUSA Excellent work. You'd do well to publish your findings on TH-cam. Do you suspect any secret societies played a major role in the development of corruption as well? Or do you suppose it's still a factor today? I've been under the impression lately that it's a multi headed monster. Part of it comes from external forces like Russia and China using subversive tactics or grey warfare. They also take advantage of greedy creatures that are home grown here. Then there's these heads and asset managers of major corporations like Vanguard ; Berkshire Hathaway and Black Rock. They seem to be globalist? One world government nut jobs. I guess the monster has three main heads. 1 regimes over seas also working internally here 2 Rich one world government cultists 3 All the folks that live and work here that help make it possible. The useful idiots and the jerks taking money like Judas. Would love to hear your thoughts. Thanks for the input 👍
@@alexashworth3119 Thank you for your input. I do believe the issue is class warfare, and the basic empath versus narcissist. The European monarchs being at the helm in both political and religious control. The monarchs created a global class whom created a new system of slavery by owning the industries that are necessary to life. For example, a privatized banking system and raw materials ownerships, owning the farms. Also, they impose mandatory contracts by citizens with corporations, the insurance and banking system are privatized, in order to drive your vehicle, own your home, or have health insurance we citizens must contract with for profit corporations, oftentimes owned by globalists. Their profits are enormous. China and Russia do not engage in this privatized system, tis why the west hates these two extremely civilized nations. I will be posting a YT video of my political party argument, that Article 4 Section 4 USC (Republican Form Guarantee Clause) established a ZERO PARTY SYSTEM. Strangely, in 1849 SCOTUS declared this Article a "political question doctrine" question and they refuse to define Republican Form. My argument is published, click my link on my about page.
In a perfect world Ron Paul would be POTUS, Gary Johnson would be VPOTUS, and Napolitano would be picked by Pres. Paul to serve as SCJ when the next seat became available. A man can dream... Though, It truly sucks that the idea of a better America remains a dream while the nightmare we currently have is reality.
Roosevelt and Wilson were of different parties, but they were both Federalists. We need to get rid of the party affiliation idea and start asking candidates if they are Federalists, or anti-Federalists in their philosophies and political stand.
When he mentioned the Koch Brothers, I almost threw up. His ardent support for those two completely contradicts his arguments and criticisms of the two presidents that led the country through such a drastic change in US history (albeit a controversial one). America was trying to find itself, and through these presidents, the country finally found ground to propel itself for the next century; for which Napolitano's republican buddies enforced while in Washington.
Without repentance, there is no safe harbor from fear, anger, confusion, and madness. A nation that doesn't want God's refuge from the storms, will just get the storms.
In 1906 Congress passed the Antiquities Act that allowed the President to declare natural sites as protected. I see no evidence that TR unlawfully took land. It bears some more research.
NO Mr. Napolitano, people adopt like Koch brothers not because they are rich, but because they use their wealth to highjack the political process. People don't hate them because they create jobs , but because they employ army of lobbyists to circumvent the will of the people for their own benefit.
I am not completely crazy about the Johnson pick, but he would be a hell of alot better than what we have now. Napolitano would have to be in the cabinet immediately! And Ben Swann, and Ryan Dawson would have to be there too!!! We Americans sat by idlely while Rome burns. This last election was disgusting, and the charade here in Tampa was worldwide shame! Bitching will get us nowhere, but whine away if it makes anybody feel any better. Good picks though.
The top quintile of any population will account for 80% of the wealth of a nation. When that tipping point is diluted or contracted, unrest will occur. Social Security and medicare are programs that disproportionately benefit the upper middle class. The 4th quintile ( population accounting for 60-80% of household income) is the only class that contributes to both programs with a median life expectancy higher than the start of payoff. Homes below $60,000/yr : 2/5 live to begin collection
Unless the interest rates are low enough for deficit expenditures to go to private parties who can generate a sufficiently high return of investment to sustainably pay off the debt through taxation.
"Profit-driven agenda" is a better way to describe Fox News in a negative light than "For Profit." Everyone with a job is technically "for profit." But Fox news tends to steer their agenda to where they'll bring in the most revenue, rather than make a profit on their own journalistic integrity, like the Judge.
I like the Judge. He is brilliant and articulate. My gripe on what he is saying is that I think TR acted because no mechanism was in place to protect the weak....not in defiance of the constitution as the Judge implies. I can't speak about Wilson. I could be wrong...but that is the sense I've gotten after reading a lot about Roosevelt.
Perhaps a 2016 Presidential run may be one reason for Judge Nap's recent weight loss and hair darkening. He looks 20 years younger & ready to take on Hillary.
![[ENGSUB] UNPRODUCTIVE DAY ใช้ชีวิต (เปื่อยๆ) ด้วยกัน 1 วัน! | OUROAD CLOSEFRiEND SS2 EP.9](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pyYKZ3kra9w/mqdefault.jpg)
Theodore Roosevelt did spend a portion of his life working and investing in North Dakota on his ranch near Medora. He's wasn't a coddled baby who had never lifted a finger.
He did all his investment in his ranch through bad trade practices
@@thor1669 I got news for you, Theodore Roosevelt was a Harvard graduate. He never attended Yale. So much for your feeble smear against the man.
@@ricardocantoral7672 Your right, he was a Freemason.. I was thinking about Taft, he was in skull & bones.. Fun fact Pinochet was also a member of skull and bones. Look it up.
“I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.” ~ Woodrow Wilson
What a quote.
He opened the door for aMarxism/Communism and all the other tyrannical ideologies being used today.
Woodrow aint worth sh**. keep researching and find out what he and his little buddy Edward Mandell House were doing. Judge iz def right about Woodrow.
Source?
Teddy Roosevelt will never be forgiven by some for opposing absolute power of corporations.
Power to the people not the politicians
Well said.
@@peterlauch6172 fuck off corporate drone
Except that Teddy R was a puppet for JP Morgan.
John Bunch seriously! He made Morgan life a hell.....not correct
I love the judge, and agree fully - but to say that TR "never had to get his fingernails dirty" like Wilson is unfair, and incorrect. After the death of his wife and mother (on the same day), TR went out west and worked as a cowboy for more than a year. He actually worked. Physical labor. Also, TR actually fought in the Spanish American War. He went through boot camp (as an officer, granted) and he rode a horse at least partially up the Sa Juan Heights, but he was in the thick of the fight, exposed to danger. He had real-world experience to go along with his academic background. True, he never ran a SUCCESSFUL business and probably never had an appreciation for just how hard that is to do...
Yes, but he did not have to, and that is the point. A year long voluntary sabbatical undertaken to invigorate and restore one’s spirits doesn’t illustrate the expression about having to get dirt under your fingernails. One could argue it illustrates its opposite. The judge is talking about wealth and privilege-needing to risk personal wealth in order to get a return on that investment, he says-not the mildly macho stuff you mention.
@@fredfood5204 Of course Roosevelt should not be considered part of the working class but he did the hard work required when he attempted to become a cattle baron. Roosevelt would have never won the respect of genuine rough neck, cowboys if he didn't get his hands dirty. He may not have been born in grinding poverty but believe you me, he worked hard as hell. He never took it easy.
Also, between Wilson and TR gave us the birth cert and social security. A way for modern enslavement as Wilson’s own words say “they will register their biological property”. That is us!!!! These two presidents were elites and sold us out. Two criminals along with Taft as a chief justice allowed it to happen. They trampled the constitution and took our natural law away and the justice department allowed it. Why? Because it was a one two check mate when they placed criminal Taft in that position. My opinion is that they all knew each other very well and what is written about them is fake. They gave the public a show and behind doors they were eating at the same table. Just like it happens today.
He only did that for about a yearvor two and didn't get down and dirty
The good judge made a very serious error. President Harding appointed Taft to the Supreme Court not Wilson. This is a major gaffe.
Somebody is paying attention. ;)
Wilson would have never appointed his GOP opponent of 1912 to the Supreme Court.
Yeah I noticed too and was quite disappointed.
Major scandal, but we are glad to have you here to set the record straight. Thank you.
Wilson was still a douche
This man is brilliant. He should be running the country.
The Man Is BRILLIANT!
Podcast host is magnificent, challenging questions. Quietly listens to answer.
☆☆☆☆☆
Andrew Napolitano never disappoints. Logical, rational, informed. Hard to argue against someone who is so demonstrably right. He's a great and cogent voice for liberty.
"When the voters recognize that the public treasury has become a public picnic, they will only send to Washington those who will give them the biggest piece of the pie." Brilliant
this was years ago and look where we are today!!! telling..!
I wish this judge would run for president and win
@@stevenmotta8207 how about Americans stop being scared idiots and do something to change this world instead of waiting on a single being to do it
Nullification is needed now more than ever. It is time we recognize our power to ignore the fed and go our own way. If states can resist federal marijuana laws, we can resist more laws than just that.
@@vunuxbuku5212 That takes being educated, and look who's educating our children: a public school system run by government. If people are in such a mood to abolish and dismantle stuff, how about starting with a public school system that teaches students down to what benefits the public schools -- statism. Socialism. Union labor. Marxism. Funded by wealth generated by, and confiscated from, individuals. The public schools clearly have failed to lift impoverished students out of poverty, and in fact has the same incentive government has to keep the impoverished impoverished.
Civics stopped being taught in 1970 in our public schools and you see the end result -- an uneducated electorate that doesn't have the first clue how self-government in a constitutional republic is supposed to operate. And that's fine with both the public schools and government in general. They don't WANT the voters to know how this is supposed to work, because it would assure that 90% of the people the voters have elected to office would lose their jobs.
@JL-XrtaMayoNoCheese PFFT. That’s the best joke anybody has said. Man you should sign up to become a comedian because what you said was just a joke.
This is the judge that should be on the Supreme Court !!!!
😊 Would be the best we ever had
An Irish man and an Italian defending the lost liberty of America. That should make any student of American history proud.
You forgot Lincoln and Franklin Roosevelt.
Generation after generation of the people including ourselves are also to blame for allowing such cancers to grow and spread within the system.
The constitution 'somehow'
I'll tell you exactly how and when.
the "federal government" shall be known as a federal corporation".
Act of Congress on February 21, 1871 (the day homesteading or right to stake a claim became camping and illegal)
Taft was appointed chief justice in 1921 by Harding.
Roosevelt died in 1919.
Judge Nap lost all credibilty with me when he stated that Dr. Ford sounds credible.
@BILL COOPER WAS RIGHT What makes you think I watch CNN?
Taft was a huge screw up.
He screwed up his governance of the Philippines and his presidency.
Roosevelt brought the United States into years of prosperity through strength, and stopped WWI from happening 10 years early in 1904 when Japan defeated Russia in a short naval battle
EXCELLENT interview. Napolitano for SCJ. A True Patriot.
I think Wilson did go a bit too far, but Roosevelt was only trying to limit the power of those who were as powerful or more powerful than the government
With his “moderate reform” approach he was also trying to keep who he saw as dangerous radicals like William Jennings Bryan, Eugene V. Debs and Woodrow Wilson from being able to use the situation to come to power and make even more sweeping changes that could disrupt societal balance.
But in doing so, it started the growth of the federal government and see what it is now. Would the weather have the people have the power of the government?
Judge. You are a low stern voice in a room full of jackals.
I can hear you perfectly clear and so many of us listen carefully to your every word. Great interview.
God bless from TEXAS!!
WT Hendrix thank you !!!! Very well said !!
Thomas Jefferson, the president who Napolitano has so much admiration for, went against his own beliefs about the national debt and arguably violated the constitutional powers of the presidency when he made the Louisiana Purchase. Where is the outrage for Jefferson?
Daniel Ryan And the expansionism westward with the Lewis-Clarke expedition that he had funded by the means of Alexander Hamilton's financial plan/bank (I thought Jefferson opposed Hamilton?) - the entire ordeal of expansionism is for bigger government, a Federalist move, I thought Jefferson was an anti-federalist? No word from the judge.
That being said, there are pros/cons to both Wilson and Roosevelt's presidency. Roosevelt might have unconstitutionally 'stolen' land (umm, something all our founding fathers did), but it also preserved many national parks and natural wonders that would have been swapped for industry/cities. He might have started the FBI, which has done some horrible things, but has also cracked down on many crimes.
Wilson, might have arrested people for what they said about WW1 (Jon Adams, another founding father he hasn't scrutinized), did the exact same thing with the Alien and Sedition act. Yet, Wilson still lead the country into ideas of creating the United Nations with his initial ideas of the League of Nations, after WW1 ended.
I see there presidency with nuances, the judge seems to be taking a very rigid stance yet very selective in the presidents he wants to condemn.
naveed akhtar I've also never heard him criticize Washington for his positions and actions during the Whiskey Rebellion.
Daniel Ryan Yup, never mentioned the Whiskey Rebellion, The Alien & Sedition acts, the unconstitutional Embargo Act which wasn't approved by congress during Jefferson's presidency, the horrible declaration of war against the British that we were defeated in the War of 1812 under Madison, The Trail of Tears/Indian removal act under Andrew Jackson, etc.
There's numerous. He cannot possibly favor the founding fathers when they weren't perfect humans. yet criticize later presidents. And this is coming from someone who respects most of the ideas/things the founders did.
Jefferson gave it to anyone who wanted to settle it. Imagine if obama gave away 80% of Nevada (government owned) for free.
+Daniel Ryan Jefferson ALSO said that debt was ok, as long as it's paid up in the same term.
As for the Louisiana Purchase, Article IV, section 3: "The Congress shall have power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory or other property belonging to the United States."
Also when several states threatened to secede over the purchase, Jefferson never called out federal troops and declared that they couldn't; on the contrary he said "if any state wishes to separate, i have no hesitation in saying let us separate."
My thoughts exactly. Really wish Liberty was cool in 2012...we've got 4 years to spread the word. Hail Liberty!
As Roosevelt once said, "The Constitution was made for the people, not the people for the Constitution"
the Constitution for the America 1886© is. THE RATIFIED CONTRACT WITH We People. The UNITED STATES CORPORATION is NOT RATIFIED!!!!!
very good interview... I agree with 99 percent of what the Judge said.
Yes. The 1 percent that I disagree is that he said Taft was appointed by Wilson. He was not. He was appointed by fellow Republican Warren G. Harding, one of the 20th century's only good presidents.
I disagree 100% of what this guy said! Theodore Roosevelt was one of the best president we’ve ever had!
@@rudycarlson8245 You don't understand modern government vs constitutional liberties or you like our modern bureaucratic paper prison state.
WRONG, Taft was not appointed to the court by Wilson, he was appointed by Wilson's successor: Warren G. Harding
I still find Theodore Roosevelt as one of the best Presidents we have ever had, also the First President Candidate to openly support women's right to vote, and even though he had wealth when he was born he made his own way by having his crowed hour in the Spanish American War with his Rough riders, I feel that judge kind of down play Theodore as person.
bob higgs He did, he isn't seeing his presidency with any nuance, just a rigid stance. If he approaches every president that has ever existed with that same consistency, he wouldn't like any president that's ever existed.
If the truth was actually known, Theodor Roosevelt is less than a person.
Usually like Judge Nap; disagree with him re: TR
mt thoughts exactly
Teddy stinks
In a perfect world, we wouldn't need government at all.
A lot of commenters going nuts over the judge's treatment of T.R. here, but you have to separate two things: the man of great courage and personality, and the president who often ignored the Constitution to do whatever he thought was good for the people. T.R. was a great character in American history, with a life full of excitement, vigor, and personal tragedy. However, he did not govern as a strict constructionist. The Panama Canal, the creation of the FBI, the setting aside of public lands to be National Parks, etc., here was a man who had a huge vision for his country, and he'd do whatever he felt was right, the Constitution being beside the point.
Conservatives who decried Obama's constant use of executive orders (and rightly so) have to back up and look at what T.R. did (and most importantly, how he did it) with the same objectivity. Whether you like what he did or not, did he have the authority, or did he just do whatever he wanted to do, the Law of the Land be damned? Personally, I like T.R. However, as a Constitution lover, I may like many of T.R.'s accomplishments, but those were things Congress should have done, or they were things that shouldn't have been done at all under the Constitution. He wasn't our worst president by far, but he certainly wasn't the best if you like limited government and a strict interpretation of the Constitution. At least he wasn't Wilson, whom I would put in the ranks of the five worst presidents in American history, along with the likes of Buchanan, Carter, and Obama. Now, some very interesting men to study in the presidency are Washington, Monroe, and Polk. I wish more people knew more about these men as president. But the last two aren't nearly as flashy as T.R., so they get little notice. Men of character rarely do.
There's some people I like, but if those same folks tampered with the Constitution I might even consider them traitors to our nation.
People who steal and then use that stolen wealth generously are still thieves.
I always knew something was off about Ted. I suppose his actions and the actions of others may not be treason, but they definitely unintentionally helped the enemies of the US.
They also broke the law and violated the US Constitution which is sacred to those who love their freedom.
Something tells me that his actions and the actions of others have directly opened the door to tyrannical forces, whomever they are.
I appreciate your insight.
Do you have anything more you would like to add?
Especially in light of the current situation where we have massive amounts of foreign influence and aggressiveness?
Thanks 👍
10 yrs ago. And first time I've seen this interview...
I'm a constitutionalist, I believe the Constitution means what it says or as written. I'm a big fan of the Judge in his defense of the Constitution and his criticism of the federal govt for ignoring it, both parties.
In the real world, limited government makes a better world.
Sometimes it's those who were born into high society that have the greatest sympathy for the middle class and working poor
Whether left or right, The Judge always tells the truth about the law. I wish he would talk more about maritime law and the ties to GB we still have.
We only have 1/3 of our Constitutional Republic left. God, this bothers me. These kind of people always know better than anyone else especially how they ought to live. And here all this time I thought T.R. was a great man.
What this man says from 8:50 onwards is EXACTLY what's happening in my country, Argentina, nowadays. If you what to know where welfare leads, take a look at my country.
God bless you from the US 🇺🇸
I love how animated Napolitano is! This guy is EPIC!
Taft was Skull and Bones..his father Alphonso Taft was one of the creators of it. He wasn't losing anything.
Wilson didn't appoint Taft as Chief Justice. Taft was appointed by Harding.
And don't forget Lincoln when he suspended the writ of habeas corpus against the ruling of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Roger B. Taney.Lincoln simply ignored the order.
@Sebastian Guevara Vaffanculo....You'd better pick up a history book stugazza..
YOU ARE MY HERO! BLESS YOU !
Not trying to set politics aside here, but looking at pictures of Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft and then researching their political careers, these two men look like the same individual. Only a few slight changes in appearance and this lineage may still be present today. Scary thought considering the political records.
I could be wrong, but either way the Judge always has an interesting view.
Such a great guy. Love his Freedom channel🦁
I believe it happened before that, when they took our states republic constitutions and replaced them with State of ... constitutions. They issued birth certificates with "legal" names. Applications in Texas the VS109 states "MOTHERS LEGAL NAME" "CHILDS LEGAL NAME" a legal name is something you give a thing, like a corporation or a business. In the 1840's or so Texas ceded SOME of its lands to the United States for the purpose of erecting military reservations. Babies legal names are Registered and parents are issued "Certificates" as proof of their registration. In order to play in the quasi public/private field of quasi government banks such as the federal reserve and all its quasi government creations you have to show proof of your legal entity - which is not really you. Back when the constitutions were authorized by the people they said, we the people of the Republic of Texas... now days they don't say that. In the congressional record of about 1864 it shows that Mr. COWAN asked Lincoln WHO were the people and Lincoln said there were two definitions according to his attorney - 1. the people (democracy) and 2 the people of congress (aristocracy). Either way they have made it de facto when Lincoln placed the states into districts and put them under military control and making them into legal identities instead of lawful creations of the people.
Interesting.
Do you suppose those secret devil worshipping societies actually exist?
I've heard some pretty convincing rumors but not much of anything else.
I appreciate you sharing your wisdom.
👍
the judge is always spotlighting the common mans welfare system, yet rarely discusses the endless corporate welfare system this country was built on off the backs of the american workers
The name Gillespie is related to the word episcopal or "bishop," and means "servant of the bishop." It's a Greek-Gaelic hybrid surname of gille (devotee) and espie (bishop). The comment that neither the Irishman or the Italian gentleman discussing Woodrow Wilson & Theodore Roosevelt would have been admitted to white institutions was noteworthy.
"Democracy should be a break on unbridled greed and power. Because capitalism, like a fire can turn from a good servant, into an evil master." - Bill Moyer
“When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes.
Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency, their sole object is gain.”
Napoleon Bonaparte.
TR was a necessary force (his actions were for the greater good)...dangerous in the wrong hands. Definitely not comfortable with the bully pulpit in today’s climate but necessary for the time even though not perfectly done the man excelled and will forever be revered.
Snip the Constitution after the Tenth Amendment and leave it that way. THAT is America; The way she was originally Ratified.
Same brah, women and blacks shouldn’t be allowed to vote and Presidents should be allowed unlimited terms.
You go Judge N.! There are not many people as smart and well informed on this topic.
I LOVE THIS MAN!
It terrible, why people telling the truth got fire?! Judge Napolitano telling the truth and they fire him! Is this a new law? I think he right and he is straight telling the truth! And why judge Napolitano he got fire? Is this a New Law?
Gotta love Napolitano! Sucks that Fox News dropped him, but he's the perfect mix of Constitutional Conservativism with Libertarian Personal Freedom.
Listen to Mark Levin if you want a real Constitutionalist to learn from....not Napolitano.
I do sometimes, but he rants a bit too much for my taste. I like Nap's demeanor, his Libertarian view, and I haven't seen any evidence that he doesn't know what he's talking about.
''When the president does it, that means it is not illegal.'' Where have I heard this before...
Napolitano...what a genius! The world at large needs more men like him. G-d bless him.
The Judge is right and I think just like him. A true catholic. I am not so much a true catholic but I believe in the judges moral values on natural law and common sense.
Hang on, social security is my money they take every check, and they decide the terms I get a penny or not. They stole my mother's entire social security. Disgusting.
Yeah thanks FDR ya fascist fanboy
We lost our country in 1913!!!
I think that the convention of states article five of American constitution for correction too the federal government. This is what our founding fathers wanted to do prevent tyranny.
Judge Napolitano is incorrect @ 8:10 - it was actually Harding that nominated Taft to the supreme court.
Judge wants to discount Teddy's cred because he was born into wealth. Why should I care about anything else he says?
just because the FEderal reserve is abused doesn't mean it was intended to be abused. Altho Milton Friedman said the Federal reserve should be abolished....
Such a fine champion for truth...may God protect JN!!!
I have used some of these programs in my life and was grateful for them.... by worked as hard and fast as I could to get off of them and did. Unfortunately many don't. And when the $Jack runs out... our perfect little Utopian society that we have tried to build in vain will crumble.. and its coming! Its sad.. but it is coming.
One thing I have to bitch about to Napolitano, TR may have had it easy, but he was one of a few of the elites that would have been just as happy to fight in whichever class he was born in... TR forced himself to do things that gave him experience of the middle and lower classes!
he wants to go back to the days when you had to ask for permission from
congress to start a new governmental department
and when you wouldn't be punished for saying something the president didn't like
I WORKED FOR OVER 55 YEARS FOR MY UK PENSION WHICH I PAID FOR BUT I'M MADE FEEL QUILTY!
Great lesson in history here.
For a real eye opener, read George Washington's Farewell Address 1789.
Pay special attention to the 19 to 26!
I've listened to it about 3 times and I learn something new each time.
The man was prophetic.
Do you suppose these horrible unconstitutional blunders are the main entry point for our foreign adversaries?
I think it plays a large role but I'm inexperienced when it comes to these tricky situations.
I believe other nations are facilitating our suicide. They want us to fall down so they won't have to fight us face to face.
@@alexashworth3119 I never received a notification for your comment. I'm now watching this clip again, and noticed your reply.
As a political scientist myself, I discovered our Founders created a ZERO PARTY SYSTEM. See Hamilton No 09, Madison No 10 (Federalist Papers).
The Torrie/Whig parties from the 175 year British Colonial America resurrected and rebranded themselves as Democrats and Whig/Republicans. The political party era in US history officially began in 1829 with Andrew Jackson. Jackson privatized banking, initiated Gunboat Diplomacy in Asia to protect British/American opium trade to China. And Jackson began breaking the Indian Treaties. It has been a Trail of Tears ever since for all Americans, not just natives.
FDR's grandfather, Warren Delano Jr, was the premier US opium smuggler to China during the 1830s, working thru Russell and Company NYC. Warren Delano Jr was a financial supporter in establishing the Democrat party. Roosevelt's were a banking cartel to wash the money.
@@PubliusUSA
Excellent work. You'd do well to publish your findings on TH-cam.
Do you suspect any secret societies played a major role in the development of corruption as well? Or do you suppose it's still a factor today?
I've been under the impression lately that it's a multi headed monster.
Part of it comes from external forces like Russia and China using subversive tactics or grey warfare.
They also take advantage of greedy creatures that are home grown here.
Then there's these heads and asset managers of major corporations like Vanguard ; Berkshire Hathaway and Black Rock. They seem to be globalist?
One world government nut jobs.
I guess the monster has three main heads.
1 regimes over seas also working internally here
2 Rich one world government cultists
3 All the folks that live and work here that help make it possible.
The useful idiots and the jerks taking money like Judas.
Would love to hear your thoughts.
Thanks for the input 👍
@@alexashworth3119 Thank you for your input. I do believe the issue is class warfare, and the basic empath versus narcissist. The European monarchs being at the helm in both political and religious control. The monarchs created a global class whom created a new system of slavery by owning the industries that are necessary to life. For example, a privatized banking system and raw materials ownerships, owning the farms. Also, they impose mandatory contracts by citizens with corporations, the insurance and banking system are privatized, in order to drive your vehicle, own your home, or have health insurance we citizens must contract with for profit corporations, oftentimes owned by globalists. Their profits are enormous. China and Russia do not engage in this privatized system, tis why the west hates these two extremely civilized nations.
I will be posting a YT video of my political party argument, that Article 4 Section 4 USC (Republican Form Guarantee Clause) established a ZERO PARTY SYSTEM. Strangely, in 1849 SCOTUS declared this Article a "political question doctrine" question and they refuse to define Republican Form. My argument is published, click my link on my about page.
This is the Judge Napolitano that was beloved, not the man he is today. When he was suspended and returned he was a changed man.
?
Nah, wilson was a evil president. Teddy was great
In a perfect world Ron Paul would be POTUS, Gary Johnson would be VPOTUS, and Napolitano would be picked by Pres. Paul to serve as SCJ when the next seat became available.
A man can dream...
Though, It truly sucks that the idea of a better America remains a dream while the nightmare we currently have is reality.
Roosevelt and Wilson were of different parties, but they were both Federalists. We need to get rid of the party affiliation idea and start asking candidates if they are Federalists, or anti-Federalists in their philosophies and political stand.
Here comes the Judge!
So, what happens to people when they are disabled, widowed, downsized, aged out, etc.?
Goodness gracious I love this man...
It would be great to have Judge Napolitano and Newt Gingrich in a discussion like this on some topic. It should be a longer time span.
When he mentioned the Koch Brothers, I almost threw up. His ardent support for those two completely contradicts his arguments and criticisms of the two presidents that led the country through such a drastic change in US history (albeit a controversial one). America was trying to find itself, and through these presidents, the country finally found ground to propel itself for the next century; for which Napolitano's republican buddies enforced while in Washington.
Very interesting, thanks for the upload!
Without repentance, there is no safe harbor from fear, anger, confusion, and madness. A nation that doesn't want God's refuge from the storms, will just get the storms.
He should have added Obama into the book ... what a great video... I will look for the book.
Bush should be added in there too
slicedGabe I think every president since 1913 should be added.
briggs9187 I agree except for JFK, he was quite good compared to the rest of them.
slicedGabe some say that is the reason that he got assassinated .... we will never know.
briggs9187 I agree with those people
In 1906 Congress passed the Antiquities Act that allowed the President to declare natural sites as protected. I see no evidence that TR unlawfully took land. It bears some more research.
I
Why do people complain and then send money to the government for more abuse?
i love that andrew tells the truth about america instead of just waving a flag and iggnoring the truth
the elegance of this man is unmatched
Just an important historic note. William H. Taft was not made Chief Justice by Wilson. He was nominated by President Warren G. Harding in 1921
FDR also was a major reason we have such a big and over reaching government now
The Colorado marijuana experiment
went like this, government legalized marijuana and taxed it. People of Colorado consume gray market marijuana.
I don't always agree with him, but the judge rocks !!!
NO Mr. Napolitano, people adopt like Koch brothers not because they are rich, but because they use their wealth to highjack the political process. People don't hate them because they create jobs , but because they employ army of lobbyists to circumvent the will of the people for their own benefit.
Gotta love Judge Napolitano! He knows his shit!
I am not completely crazy about the Johnson pick, but he would be a hell of alot better than what we have now. Napolitano would have to be in the cabinet immediately! And Ben Swann, and Ryan Dawson would have to be there too!!! We Americans sat by idlely while Rome burns. This last election was disgusting, and the charade here in Tampa was worldwide shame! Bitching will get us nowhere, but whine away if it makes anybody feel any better. Good picks though.
Judge Napolitano should run for president in 2016!!!
Those items become property of (usually) State governments and are auctioned or disposed of by the government, not the Police.
The top quintile of any population will account for 80% of the wealth of a nation. When that tipping point is diluted or contracted, unrest will occur.
Social Security and medicare are programs that disproportionately benefit the upper middle class. The 4th quintile ( population accounting for 60-80% of household income) is the only class that contributes to both programs with a median life expectancy higher than the start of payoff. Homes below $60,000/yr : 2/5 live to begin collection
No in a perfect world there would be no office of the president nor any other part of the government. Anarcho-capitalism baby !
Unless the interest rates are low enough for deficit expenditures to go to private parties who can generate a sufficiently high return of investment to sustainably pay off the debt through taxation.
It was Harding who made Taft the Chief Justice, not Wilson.
"Profit-driven agenda" is a better way to describe Fox News in a negative light than "For Profit." Everyone with a job is technically "for profit." But Fox news tends to steer their agenda to where they'll bring in the most revenue, rather than make a profit on their own journalistic integrity, like the Judge.
I like the Judge. He is brilliant and articulate. My gripe on what he is saying is that I think TR acted because no mechanism was in place to protect the weak....not in defiance of the constitution as the Judge implies. I can't speak about Wilson. I could be wrong...but that is the sense I've gotten after reading a lot about Roosevelt.
Perhaps a 2016 Presidential run may be one reason for
Judge Nap's recent weight loss and hair darkening. He
looks 20 years younger & ready to take on Hillary.
Our solutions aren't federal that cancer is long since rotted the federal body. Time to nullify
...but here he just looks like a well aged and well shaved Teen wolf!
Put this man on the Supreme Court!