First time hitting my feed, but a little feedback that I’m four and a half minutes in and I still haven’t hit any substitute content and I am been sold. Hope it’s uphill from here.
@ yeah it was good, I follow an absolute ton of AI channels and pretty much consume all the content, my two cents is shrink your advertisement for the mastermind group and push it further in the podcast after you’ve given value. Anyway, just my two cents. Enjoyed the show thanks.
Which is more likely: 1) a UBI that a person could live off of (a figure tied to inflation of today's equivalent of ~$2k a month) 2) the implementation of a new economic system 3) economic collapse with the vast majority of the population living under bridges ?
Honestly out of those three options, I believe option 1 (real, viable UBI amounts) is the most likely. While that may sound naive, the fact is that option 2 sounds like it may be too ambitious to occur within the next 10-15 years, and option 3, while it may sounds like it’s ideal for the powers that be, would probably be very suboptimal for them. If the vast majority of people are homeless, broke, and living under bridges, society will simply collapse, and violent, bloody revolution (or attempted revolution) will be the inevitable outcome. It’s simply too unstable to expect 95% of the population will accept slowly starving to death, and would not be to the advantage of the wealthy and powerful to pursue this path. In my mind, the real question is not which of those three we’re most likely to pursue, but whether we will have the ability to choose from those options at all-as opposed to losing control of the AI in some way, or bad actors using it to completely destabilize the world order, or any number of other catastrophic outcomes that would completely foreclose each of the options you mentioned.
I love the examples discussed about how to properly gauge ROI. I must apply this Math when determining how much time and money is saved.
"very few people understand what's coming"
Spot on ❤
First time hitting my feed, but a little feedback that I’m four and a half minutes in and I still haven’t hit any substitute content and I am been sold. Hope it’s uphill from here.
Happy to hear this, hope you enjoyed the rest of the episode. We love feedback if you have any!
@ yeah it was good, I follow an absolute ton of AI channels and pretty much consume all the content, my two cents is shrink your advertisement for the mastermind group and push it further in the podcast after you’ve given value. Anyway, just my two cents. Enjoyed the show thanks.
Thank you for that feedback, glad you enjoyed the show!
Which is more likely: 1) a UBI that a person could live off of (a figure tied to inflation of today's equivalent of ~$2k a month) 2) the implementation of a new economic system 3) economic collapse with the vast majority of the population living under bridges ?
You mean trickle-down economics won't fix this?! /s
@@prospectr17 lol
Honestly out of those three options, I believe option 1 (real, viable UBI amounts) is the most likely. While that may sound naive, the fact is that option 2 sounds like it may be too ambitious to occur within the next 10-15 years, and option 3, while it may sounds like it’s ideal for the powers that be, would probably be very suboptimal for them. If the vast majority of people are homeless, broke, and living under bridges, society will simply collapse, and violent, bloody revolution (or attempted revolution) will be the inevitable outcome. It’s simply too unstable to expect 95% of the population will accept slowly starving to death, and would not be to the advantage of the wealthy and powerful to pursue this path.
In my mind, the real question is not which of those three we’re most likely to pursue, but whether we will have the ability to choose from those options at all-as opposed to losing control of the AI in some way, or bad actors using it to completely destabilize the world order, or any number of other catastrophic outcomes that would completely foreclose each of the options you mentioned.
Hi, how do you think this whole AI revolution will impact countries that don't have their own "Meta or OpenAI"?
Prob have able willing workers
As long as Meta AI is still open source, they'll just be able to continue taking that and using it.