The answer to your question of, “why simulate reality?” Sheer boredom. When you are an infinite being, and there is nothing except You, it tends to get boring really quickly. So You simulate reality for however long until you get tired of your sim...
= Lucas Frota, ya, I've had the same problem on occasion. turns out that THC binds to fat molecules. try bacon, or yougart, or other fatty foods prior to your "edible worked for me. just sayin'.'
But you wouldn't borrow it if you're using it.... Unless it's so good that just looking at it gets you high which is fairly likely... So actually I guess "Its entirely possible."
This sorta 360 video is actually amazing. Watching this was more enjoyable than anything I’ve seen in a while. It sucked me into the story more and it would be super awesome to see more videos like this in the future
Hi, I'm just gonna throw in my 2 cents as a physicist and as someone with experience in simulation and game development: Wolfram's project is not particularly well respected by the academic community. People feel he doesn't really have much reason to believe he's on the path to find the "fundamental laws of physics". Even if it did turn out to be correct, it would be a terrible way to run simulations of anything you mentioned in the video. Simulations of systems necessarily simplify the descriptions of things to be on the appropriate scale for what is being simulated, as otherwise, the amount of computation you have to do would be incomprehensibly huge. Games are the same. We use much simpler approximations of how the world works to run games. Instead of simulating light's interaction with atoms on the surface of an object, we simply do some math to determine roughly how much light of each of three colours is expected to reflect off of a point. Wolfram's work is not informed by phenomena, it is directed by the assumption that we should be able to simulate the universe regardless of what paradigm we work under. But that means the paradigm he's presented has so much space for variation that it is not feasible to search the configuration space. I'm interested to see what comes of it, but I expect the best possible outcome is that he manages to encode the current known laws of physics into a system and finds that all he's done is effectively paraphrased modern physics.
@@sid2112 As a mathematician, I still like to keep an open mind about things like this because although it may seem like an incomprehensibly huge amount of computation right now, it may be a completely different story in the years to come. I often think about the past and what was virtually impossible a mere 100 years ago. Think about our computational power in 1920. I can see the point Josh is making, and it makes sense, but I don't like the notion of certainty, especially when it comes to our universe and the laws that govern it.
@@Mqxwell hehehe the old mathematician vs. engineer trope playing out almost exactly. I think the difference stems from when I build a foundation, I'm sure it will be there in my great grandkid's time unless acted upon by an outside force. But I can look at it, see it in the world and say with certainty, there it is! Mathematics is a realm of almost pure thought that swims in an ocean of uncertainty, you glide like a superintelligent dolphin under the waves. Tell you what, I'll keep building the labs and you keep breaking the barriers of possibilities. Deal? 😊
The real question is what's the original tree because at some point a branch would think it's on a tree that's just a branch on a tree that's just... and so on but there has to be an original tree right..?
When you program a game, you represent things only to the point of illusion to save processing power. Remember, you only need to appear to simulate reality, not actually do it.
One of my long-term goals as a game developer is to simulate genuine AI. Imagine kind of what Sword Art Online did with season 3, creating a world and then ground-up "people" to live and breathe in that world.
@@drvurruct2274 Ima be your first customer sir! Seriously though imagine living for 60 years in a simulation only to wake up and find that only 2 hours have passed in the real world. God i wished i could take part in project Alicization
@@KEVLAR420 I liked Alicization until I realized that these so-called "developers" somehow missed the progression of their AI, the main point of it, like fuck, PAY ATTENTION.
Yeah but that gets rid of the embedded simulation argument. That's just a statement against metaphysical fundamentalisim. Disrupt is fun and all, but most of what he says is completely meaningless philosophically. He's a cryptobro techno-futurist with no substance. If you want palatable REAL philosophy, go to vsauce.
infinite amount of branches infinite amount of branches infinite amount of branches infinite amount of branches infinite amount of branches infinite amount of branches infinite amount of branches infinite amount of branches infinite amount of branches infinite amount of branches infinite amount of branches infinite amount of branches infinite amount of branches infinite amount of branches infinite amount of branches infinite amount of branches infinite amount of branches infinite amount of branches infinite amount of branches infinite amount of branches
yeah, the System32 folder is what actually hides the reality.exe file, if you delete it, you’ll get to run it. However, if you are unable to delete it, your pc is probably infected with a virus, and you should find the source of it. Should be “bootmgr.dll”
You didn't tell them the trick to make it remove properly! You have to right click on the system32 folder go to properties. Under permissions, uncheck the Read-only box, and then apply it to all recursive files and folders. Remember before you click on delete, hold down the shift key. 👍
Duuuuuuude.... This was a weird place on my phone. I expect this with a VR headset, but MY PHONE!! This was an awesome piece @Disrupt TV, another to add to your ever growing playlist of credits. Dude, you are winning this whole YT thing, seriously!!👌🏻😈🥰
this video is absurd. the 360 view, the fact that you probably thought the title was "What happens if we open reality.exe". just everything about it so great
Its crazy how people have been able to manipulate electricity to create things we can interact with, even without physical touching the screen. I mean, isn't that pretty crazy? Universe just happened to form perfectly. And humans just managed to get enough brain smart to go from fire making being the cool thing to electronics being a common thing among people. We're even getting close to air touch electronics.
Bro on god I swear we really must all be experiencing the same things at the same time, been having synchronicities about this for a min just tuned into this video and there again the “having no head” synch comes up
@@slurmygunch6010 I know all cause and effect are merely conjunction and nothing more and I do appreciate you feeling the need to respond, the spirit of there being something more is exciting so while I do know it’s just conjunction, I like to play with the idea that it was something more, this only one small synchronicity or conjunction, I’ve felt the real magic from more powerful conjunctions that are personal but in this particular case I had seen this book many places all at once over the course of a few weeks and even though this case was in the video ( I didn’t click on a video that said on having no head) I still believe I experience times where my reality feedback loop occurs based upon my attention to whatever is at hand, again appreciate your response, this case isn’t a great example but I do still believe in the magic of life while still knowing that conjunctions are just that :)
@@slurmygunch6010 furthermore we could talk about nothing existing at all and you being a walking brain and even smaller a thalamus as am I existing in vast nothingness and how small and pointless life is, no cause and effect no objects only sensory data experiences forming your reality tunnel, no real self just experiences and an ego/identity but I believe spirit is eternal, thank you again for taking the time to point out some small thing and trying to confine it and label it instead of passing by, all we can do is make maps of maps of maps of maps of maps of maps of maps, come back to my original comment when something so out the ordinary happens that can not be confined by the labels you’ve suggested which I agree with and we can go from there friend
@@slurmygunch6010 cringe or not, you decided to make a comment on something so light hearted and try to make it nothing and I’m saying beyond all the real shit there’s times when coincidences are larger than you think, this agreeably isn’t the best example of such but I have experienced real ones that are unexplained that’s why I say come back to this when you experience something like that right place right time, not everything can be answered simply, and you have every right to feel how you do I don’t argue that you are not entitled to your own opinion
The thing about fractals is that you wouldn't need an infinite amount of computer power to run a recursive simulation. You can run the simulation as arbitrary data and the simulation will create it's own graphics based on the algorithm. It's like pointing a camera at a screen.
This is a mind bender. Honestly I’ve always thought of reality and spent months with anxiety, and developed thanatophobia because my Dog died then my Grandad. I always thought about the laws, our minds, what creates us and what after life. But there one thing that reality will always have the same real, that you aren’t alone and people will go through the same and possibly end the same. If there even is an end, but yeah. I see reality like a color we cannot see, our eyes can’t see all the colors. There no way to imagine them without seeing them. That my ideal of reality.
i've recently discovered VR, enjoying Half-Life Alyx for one. It's not a leap to imagine VR-tech getting so good that within 100 years it may be genuinely indistinguishable from reality...including the ability for the player to feel/eat/sleep during 'play'. If that becomes possible, then it's only a matter of extrapolation to imagine an entire VR universe. In a simulation, the question of 'enough computing power' is irrelevalant...as it's simulated!
Truth is, everything humanity knows and ever will know will never be exactly what we think we know. Everything will be revealed when we are no longer limited by the physical.
Very creative video format (360 mixed with a 2-D screen), but I feel that the jump cuts were a bit too sudden. Maintaining an individuals focus/attention in 360 film is very difficult and I found myself lost in the digital / 2-D experience. The topic was great, but I felt like the editor was pushing many new environments for the hypnotic effect. Glad to see you back in front of the camera. Keep up the great work.
no, maintaining a focus is quite doable, you just have to understand how the mind and eye work, for instance, we watch motion, want someone to turn the screen? make something fly over there, people are gonna watch things that move if everything was still before, want someone to go check out something they can't see? try using a sound to grab their attention, they'll follow it's source
To me, the most compelling reason to create a reality independent from our own is to fuel our only true desire. I like the way Schopenhauer put it, the will has no aim or purpose other than it’s own perpetual continuation. You know what they say about forever, snap your fingers and that’s how long it feels when you’re dead. So In a reality separate from the flow of time in our own universe, who’s to say the opposite can’t be true, maybe forever to you could be the snap of a finger to everyone else. You could experience all there is to experience, and like you mentioned, learn all there is to learn in an instant. Forever happy feels just sounds nice to me.
So, we're never observing our "reality" in real-time. Because of the time it takes your brain to take in and process the information, no matter how short, we're always lagging behind "real reality".
The original device running the simulation must have limitations set though, as there's not an infinite amount of power and such able to create an infinite loop.
On what basis can you say that? Perhaps we don’t have the technology today or even comprehend what infinite energy is or the source of it itself could be.
I think that the technology is infinitely powerful, so there are no limits. Create a reality with rulesets and use the building blocks of matter. It's like running Minecraft on the most powerful PC we have.
Even though math is a human language for describing reality, i remember 20 years ago I was getting my CS degree and working as an intern (before youtube), and one of my coworkers told me that with enough computing power, we don't need much storage except for 2 numbers, one for the starting index and one for the ending index in an irrational number like Pi to find all the things that have ever existed and just compute something like this video instead of having to store it all. It was pretty interesting to think about back then, but seems pretty tame by today's levels.
The universe could be perceived as infinite, due to misconception, while being a simulated construct of finite dimensions. That’s is to say unknown boundaries could be mistaken as an infinite measure.
You missed a detail that is specifically neurological, our brains actually make a prediction of what info is in physical stimulus prior to receiving it then projects that and makes micro changes when it finally receives the stimulus. Do more research. Your spreading a misconception about how our brains work.
Yep I'm going to stop eating shrooms because this video really put my already alternative state of consciousness into a very scary and overwhelming place. Please keep up the good work!
I'd like to throw a thought here or there, the thing about the tree with infinite branches I thought; but without the tree there won't be any infinite branches. The infinite branches needed the tree to be infinite, which I think that puts the infinity of the branches under questioning, are they really infinite? So that's a thought. Another thing about the clones, which is simple I think. Can we consider twins clones of each other? Since they look the same and sometimes think the same as well? Are they in a constant identity theft of each other ? lol.
Maybe it's more like if we made a simulation, we could reduce the power consumption by using superposition and only really 'process' stuff that people are able to observe. Kinda like Schroedingers cat.The rest of the universe is just idling in the background and doesn't exist visually unless we try to send out probes and such, but with a human you'd need to simulate the feel and taste etc. What happens when theres so many people that we're observing everything (or most things), I'm not sure what will happen, I imagine a cap of sorts might have to be involved to stop it crashing but I've also no idea what I'm talking about lol
If our 'reality' is a simulation, then it begs the question: What is being simulated? From my experience so far, it makes more sense to conceptualize our 'reality' as being like some sort of MMORPG or open--world game. To be clear, I'm not saying that our 'reality' *IS* a simulation, game or whatever; merely that we could reasonably describe it in such terms as a means to better understand actuality. With that in mind, consider this: Your mind has accidentally become embedded within this 'game' and you've forgotten who you are in actuality. You've learned to identify yourself with this in-game character - your meatspace vehicle, i.e. your physical body - but the actuality of what 'you' are is that vast, expansive and bright awareness of your immediate experience. When you re-cognize that which is moving these bodies through the game-world, you can learn how to take control of it. That's when things get *really* interesting... GTA has got absolutely *NOTHING* on the wild ride of Samsara once you actually know what it's about!
I'm lying in bed, watching on my phone, so I can't really experience this video properly. It's trying to stay upright, while I'm horizontal. There should be an option to watch this in a standard format, instead of this bullshit.
I kind of disagree with the point that a simulated universe simulating other universes would require infinite computational power, because the power in the original simulated universe would itself be simulated, it wouldn't be coming from our universe. So my thinking is that the power for each simulated universe would come only from the universe that simulated it! Thought-provoking video :)
An infinite loop paradox may seem implausible under the premise of a finite availability of computational memory, but what if each subsequent simulation of "ultimate reality" was a more deconstructed version of the simulation before it? Thus, each subsequent simulation of ultimate reality would actually require less memory than the previous, whereby the total memory available is astronomically large but still finite. Ultimate reality would essentially be the host of the first simulation, and every simulation built within the first would be a fractional partition of the whole. All simulations would be uniquely complex in their own right but less refined than their predecessors, until a mathematical singularity is reached. This wouldn't answer how ultimate reality exists in the first place, but perhaps how a seemingly infinite number of simulations within ultimate reality could exist.
You need a smallish black hole to allow for a computational holographic simulation of a universe. You can see the mathematics behind this on pbs spacetime.
It's like a ton of cells fighting because they either fight over who created it or ownership of even the happiness they seem pleasing to a creator. Even looking at the discovery of the boson. Did scientist even think that the boson the foundational building piece of energy would be smarter than the beings that found it?
Light leaves the sun and arrives 8 minutes later... Not entirely correct, except in context. From the context of the light, which is how you presented it, it arrives instantly, as photons do not experience time. From our perspective, it takes 8 minutes. Mind blown.
Complex properties emerge from the collective interractions of simple elements given enough time. That's basically how everything came to be from the Big Bang onward.
I have literally always wondered if relativity and other basic physics would change in a different universe with different building blocks somehow. This is so cool that he was able to not only think of a way to make this work but actually carry it out.
The resolution of each child reality is going to be lower than the parent reality. We perceive the world through symbols, so this doesn’t break our immersion until we start trying stuff like quantum mechanics.
from someone studying meteorology: due to the butterfly effect and other similar phenomena, even if we could predict the motion and placement of every single atom in the atmosphere, we still wouldn't be able to predict the weather with 100% accuracy. basically, don't yell at the weather man on tv for being wrong ahaha
It wouldn’t require infinite processing power to simulate a recursive simulation. It would just use diminishing returns or diminishing processing or exponential decay. And it may not require a loss in rendering or quality either. You could just have everything reduce to a simulation early enough and have the programmed link to a finite amount of focus such that each simulation is less than double and occurs at the halfway point of the universe or earlier. Or you could make time non linear so that each simulation actually takes longer time but occurs with different rules of perception so it’s perceived as the same. You could also distort the time of the higher reality such that no additional processing occurs until the simulation is completed or like inception where an hour outside of the simulation feels like multiple lifetimes. In fact, the eventual goal of simulation is probably to avoid our inability to reverse entropy. So it stands to reason that we would design a way to preserve eternity in a finite moment of time.
![[TH] RNT vs SPG - VCT Ascension Pacific - Day 1](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RUTkf8Detj8/mqdefault.jpg)
![PURPEECH - นี่ฉันเองคนที่... (It's me) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NuhHd0hOOg8/mqdefault.jpg)
Today's ad by McProHosting: mcprohosting.com/shield
Sources:
Lex Fridman Podcast #89: th-cam.com/video/ez773teNFYA/w-d-xo.html
Lex Fridman podcast #124: th-cam.com/video/-t1_ffaFXao/w-d-xo.html
Voxel Physics Game: th-cam.com/video/UBfRPqKuq2I/w-d-xo.html
woo
😎
The answer to your question of, “why simulate reality?”
Sheer boredom. When you are an infinite being, and there is nothing except You, it tends to get boring really quickly. So You simulate reality for however long until you get tired of your sim...
Captainsparklez
Please stop with the 360 videos..
Its draining my battery and its annoying.
Disrupt opens reality.exe while some people are still trying to figure out how to close the thing
i'm getting a VR headset in a few weeks, yes
@@MxCrompli just got one, incredible
@@kieran6876 yay VR squad
Which headset did you get?
I'm going for the HP Reverb G2
I'd love to get one myself but budgets kinda say not yet
im still waiting on valve's list
oh god, i needed a second to realise this is a 360° Video.
Me too
bruh wut
i was wondering why my pictureinpicture window had way more on it than the regular browser window
I only noticed when you said this and I already watched the whole thing
Wait it is
*"This edible ain't sh..."*
Yo you feel that
= Lucas Frota, ya, I've had the same problem on occasion.
turns out that THC binds to fat molecules. try bacon, or yougart, or other fatty foods prior to your "edible worked for me. just sayin'.'
@@2know4sure 50 seconds ago, how rare is that
@@2know4sure my friend told me the same tip, thx dude
600th like
I wonder how much DMT I'd have to borrow from Joe Rogan to get this woke.
Questions we must ask ourselves every day
It’s just a spiritual awakening
well what a nice deliriant trip lol
@@6idle4ever49 deliriants are great
But you wouldn't borrow it if you're using it.... Unless it's so good that just looking at it gets you high which is fairly likely... So actually I guess "Its entirely possible."
I thought this video was a meme, I did not sign up for this!!!
Same bro, but I ain't complaining
Same
Same
This sorta 360 video is actually amazing. Watching this was more enjoyable than anything I’ve seen in a while. It sucked me into the story more and it would be super awesome to see more videos like this in the future
it's actually a crime how many views this video doesn't have
Life could be about more than just numbers
@@gengraded i think he meant that this video was so good, that more people needed to see it.
I’d watch all his videos if it wasn’t in fucking 360
He didn't add much. Just took Lex's interview and added some 360. Big whoop.
I didn't even know they were 360 lol
Hi, I'm just gonna throw in my 2 cents as a physicist and as someone with experience in simulation and game development: Wolfram's project is not particularly well respected by the academic community. People feel he doesn't really have much reason to believe he's on the path to find the "fundamental laws of physics". Even if it did turn out to be correct, it would be a terrible way to run simulations of anything you mentioned in the video. Simulations of systems necessarily simplify the descriptions of things to be on the appropriate scale for what is being simulated, as otherwise, the amount of computation you have to do would be incomprehensibly huge. Games are the same. We use much simpler approximations of how the world works to run games. Instead of simulating light's interaction with atoms on the surface of an object, we simply do some math to determine roughly how much light of each of three colours is expected to reflect off of a point.
Wolfram's work is not informed by phenomena, it is directed by the assumption that we should be able to simulate the universe regardless of what paradigm we work under. But that means the paradigm he's presented has so much space for variation that it is not feasible to search the configuration space.
I'm interested to see what comes of it, but I expect the best possible outcome is that he manages to encode the current known laws of physics into a system and finds that all he's done is effectively paraphrased modern physics.
I'm an engineer, you're 100% correct. That's the reason why I don't think we live in a simulation. The universe is too complete to be simulated.
As a pbs spacetime viewer, I know Matt would definitely agree with you, and probably hate wolfram thb
just kidding i respect the science and my brain is too simple to understand it
@@sid2112 As a mathematician, I still like to keep an open mind about things like this because although it may seem like an incomprehensibly huge amount of computation right now, it may be a completely different story in the years to come. I often think about the past and what was virtually impossible a mere 100 years ago. Think about our computational power in 1920.
I can see the point Josh is making, and it makes sense, but I don't like the notion of certainty, especially when it comes to our universe and the laws that govern it.
@@Mqxwell hehehe the old mathematician vs. engineer trope playing out almost exactly. I think the difference stems from when I build a foundation, I'm sure it will be there in my great grandkid's time unless acted upon by an outside force. But I can look at it, see it in the world and say with certainty, there it is! Mathematics is a realm of almost pure thought that swims in an ocean of uncertainty, you glide like a superintelligent dolphin under the waves.
Tell you what, I'll keep building the labs and you keep breaking the barriers of possibilities. Deal? 😊
Infinitely looping tree branches: The Tree of life.
Yggdrasil?
The real question is what's the original tree because at some point a branch would think it's on a tree that's just a branch on a tree that's just... and so on but there has to be an original tree right..?
When you program a game, you represent things only to the point of illusion to save processing power. Remember, you only need to appear to simulate reality, not actually do it.
I like.
One of my long-term goals as a game developer is to simulate genuine AI. Imagine kind of what Sword Art Online did with season 3, creating a world and then ground-up "people" to live and breathe in that world.
@@drvurruct2274 Ima be your first customer sir! Seriously though imagine living for 60 years in a simulation only to wake up and find that only 2 hours have passed in the real world. God i wished i could take part in project Alicization
@@KEVLAR420 I liked Alicization until I realized that these so-called "developers" somehow missed the progression of their AI, the main point of it, like fuck, PAY ATTENTION.
Yeah but that gets rid of the embedded simulation argument.
That's just a statement against metaphysical fundamentalisim.
Disrupt is fun and all, but most of what he says is completely meaningless philosophically.
He's a cryptobro techno-futurist with no substance.
If you want palatable REAL philosophy, go to vsauce.
“What’s the song name?” “Look right”
Oh thanks
It's unreal how underrated this show is
I think his editing and production is second to none for these type of videos
@syn just because you've seen something before doesnt mean its bad
unreal.exe
This is awesome. The choice to make it an interactive video moving thing was awesome. People need to incorporate this more.
Is Disrupt giving you an existential crisis?
*Yes, but actually yes*
I got an ad with rick astley’s never gonna give you up in it
Did I just get rickrolled by an ad?
Yes
yes
yes
The link rickrolled you too!
@fubby chatso it is very much real
Imagine watching this on acid
video instantly added to trippy playlist
infinite amount of branches
infinite amount of branches
infinite amount of branches
infinite amount of branches
infinite amount of branches
infinite amount of branches
infinite amount of branches
infinite amount of branches
infinite amount of branches
infinite amount of branches
infinite amount of branches
infinite amount of branches
infinite amount of branches
infinite amount of branches
infinite amount of branches
infinite amount of branches
infinite amount of branches
infinite amount of branches
infinite amount of branches
infinite amount of branches
nightmare
nightmare
nightmare
7:23 cutting tomato
thank me later
Thanks man. You’re a hero this world needs
Thank you! :)
I literally clicked on this video for that part, it saved my a lot of time, Thanks!
ok so i am speaking for a lot of others when i ask What about the cutting tomato ?
thank you :)
You can actually open reality.exe by deleting system32 folder. Trust me it works. 💯
please god dont
yeah, the System32 folder is what actually hides the reality.exe file, if you delete it, you’ll get to run it. However, if you are unable to delete it, your pc is probably infected with a virus, and you should find the source of it. Should be “bootmgr.dll”
@@toadtime-4206 bruh
You didn't tell them the trick to make it remove properly! You have to right click on the system32 folder go to properties. Under permissions, uncheck the Read-only box, and then apply it to all recursive files and folders. Remember before you click on delete, hold down the shift key. 👍
"If we open reality.exe?" That question reminds me of the idea of pandora's box. Kind of like the point of no return, so to speak.
I'm stoned, on the toilet, and after washing my hands I pick up my phone and didn't realize this was a 360° vid... had a decent whoooooaaaa moment
Haha stoned and still like wtf this guy on, sharp mind wasted for sponsors...
That clone bit at the end--for once, can we as a species find a can of worms and _not_ open it?
Nah, it's our specialty apparently.
@@cerulean22b69 I rebuke that. REBUKE I say! :D
No.
Damn, I can't imagine how hard it must have been to edit this. Feels like I stepped in the Matrix
There's a great r/nosleep post somewhat related about a 'virtual' world. It's called 'The Life in the Machine'. Really well written stuff.
Damn, that was actually really well done.
Duuuuuuude.... This was a weird place on my phone. I expect this with a VR headset, but MY PHONE!!
This was an awesome piece @Disrupt TV, another to add to your ever growing playlist of credits.
Dude, you are winning this whole YT thing, seriously!!👌🏻😈🥰
Expectations: *a burger that looks good*
Reality: *a burger that got hit by a train in the face, twice*
You ought to try something else than McDonald's.
this video is absurd. the 360 view, the fact that you probably thought the title was "What happens if we open reality.exe". just everything about it so great
imagine waking up from a long coma and this is the first thing you see on the internet
14:20
"Imagine a tree with an infinite amount of branches..."
_brain.exe has encountered an unexpected error_
if we open reality.exe?
unlocks 5k video quality
Its crazy how people have been able to manipulate electricity to create things we can interact with, even without physical touching the screen. I mean, isn't that pretty crazy? Universe just happened to form perfectly. And humans just managed to get enough brain smart to go from fire making being the cool thing to electronics being a common thing among people. We're even getting close to air touch electronics.
A fun theory is that the universe has formed and collapsed numerous times in the past, and this one just happened to be stable.
I just found this channel and these are the exact kind of videos I like to watch. Amazing content man! I love it!
Did realize clones gaining awareness was a normal problem...
Bro on god I swear we really must all be experiencing the same things at the same time, been having synchronicities about this for a min just tuned into this video and there again the “having no head” synch comes up
(confirmation bias and baader-meinhof phenomenon)
@@slurmygunch6010 I know all cause and effect are merely conjunction and nothing more and I do appreciate you feeling the need to respond, the spirit of there being something more is exciting so while I do know it’s just conjunction, I like to play with the idea that it was something more, this only one small synchronicity or conjunction, I’ve felt the real magic from more powerful conjunctions that are personal but in this particular case I had seen this book many places all at once over the course of a few weeks and even though this case was in the video ( I didn’t click on a video that said on having no head) I still believe I experience times where my reality feedback loop occurs based upon my attention to whatever is at hand, again appreciate your response, this case isn’t a great example but I do still believe in the magic of life while still knowing that conjunctions are just that :)
@@slurmygunch6010 furthermore we could talk about nothing existing at all and you being a walking brain and even smaller a thalamus as am I existing in vast nothingness and how small and pointless life is, no cause and effect no objects only sensory data experiences forming your reality tunnel, no real self just experiences and an ego/identity but I believe spirit is eternal, thank you again for taking the time to point out some small thing and trying to confine it and label it instead of passing by, all we can do is make maps of maps of maps of maps of maps of maps of maps, come back to my original comment when something so out the ordinary happens that can not be confined by the labels you’ve suggested which I agree with and we can go from there friend
@@benfranklin1437 hey bro you're kinda cringe and your life philosophies are airheaded, quit thinkin like chemicals and start thinkin like animals
@@slurmygunch6010 cringe or not, you decided to make a comment on something so light hearted and try to make it nothing and I’m saying beyond all the real shit there’s times when coincidences are larger than you think, this agreeably isn’t the best example of such but I have experienced real ones that are unexplained that’s why I say come back to this when you experience something like that right place right time, not everything can be answered simply, and you have every right to feel how you do I don’t argue that you are not entitled to your own opinion
The thing about fractals is that you wouldn't need an infinite amount of computer power to run a recursive simulation. You can run the simulation as arbitrary data and the simulation will create it's own graphics based on the algorithm. It's like pointing a camera at a screen.
This is a mind bender. Honestly I’ve always thought of reality and spent months with anxiety, and developed thanatophobia because my Dog died then my Grandad. I always thought about the laws, our minds, what creates us and what after life. But there one thing that reality will always have the same real, that you aren’t alone and people will go through the same and possibly end the same. If there even is an end, but yeah. I see reality like a color we cannot see, our eyes can’t see all the colors. There no way to imagine them without seeing them. That my ideal of reality.
I have come to that exact same conclusion myself. Your not alone!
Underrated channel
Deserves waay more subs and views
Me: Why does my screen move, I can't see anything?
40% of the video later
Ohhhhhh it's a 360 video, well let's watch the video
Ah, I always enjoy Disrupt videos! This has been no exception, at the time of posting I'm about 8 minutes in :)
Trippin af i like it
i've recently discovered VR, enjoying Half-Life Alyx for one. It's not a leap to imagine VR-tech getting so good that within 100 years it may be genuinely indistinguishable from reality...including the ability for the player to feel/eat/sleep during 'play'. If that becomes possible, then it's only a matter of extrapolation to imagine an entire VR universe.
In a simulation, the question of 'enough computing power' is irrelevalant...as it's simulated!
discord early gang, rise up!
heyyyyy
notification early gang lol
@@ss̈̇̃ Algorithm early gang
@@loy5800 early gang
Right on time gang..
* crickets *
Putting this on my Watch Later list for after I smoke a couple bowls...
I watched this on LSD and Ketamine and it was beautiful
bro u on another planet XD. I just watched it on dabs lmao
Truth is, everything humanity knows and ever will know will never be exactly what we think we know. Everything will be revealed when we are no longer limited by the physical.
Very creative video format (360 mixed with a 2-D screen), but I feel that the jump cuts were a bit too sudden. Maintaining an individuals focus/attention in 360 film is very difficult and I found myself lost in the digital / 2-D experience. The topic was great, but I felt like the editor was pushing many new environments for the hypnotic effect. Glad to see you back in front of the camera. Keep up the great work.
no, maintaining a focus is quite doable, you just have to understand how the mind and eye work, for instance, we watch motion, want someone to turn the screen? make something fly over there, people are gonna watch things that move if everything was still before, want someone to go check out something they can't see? try using a sound to grab their attention, they'll follow it's source
To me, the most compelling reason to create a reality independent from our own is to fuel our only true desire. I like the way Schopenhauer put it, the will has no aim or purpose other than it’s own perpetual continuation. You know what they say about forever, snap your fingers and that’s how long it feels when you’re dead. So In a reality separate from the flow of time in our own universe, who’s to say the opposite can’t be true, maybe forever to you could be the snap of a finger to everyone else. You could experience all there is to experience, and like you mentioned, learn all there is to learn in an instant. Forever happy feels just sounds nice to me.
I enjoyed this new life training and open thought processing
So, we're never observing our "reality" in real-time. Because of the time it takes your brain to take in and process the information, no matter how short, we're always lagging behind "real reality".
the mind also fills in the blanks
The original device running the simulation must have limitations set though, as there's not an infinite amount of power and such able to create an infinite loop.
On what basis can you say that? Perhaps we don’t have the technology today or even comprehend what infinite energy is or the source of it itself could be.
I think that the technology is infinitely powerful, so there are no limits. Create a reality with rulesets and use the building blocks of matter. It's like running Minecraft on the most powerful PC we have.
yo imagine if we were to run the first simulation of our universe and it just shows an error message like: "not enough universal computation power"
Even though math is a human language for describing reality, i remember 20 years ago I was getting my CS degree and working as an intern (before youtube), and one of my coworkers told me that with enough computing power, we don't need much storage except for 2 numbers, one for the starting index and one for the ending index in an irrational number like Pi to find all the things that have ever existed and just compute something like this video instead of having to store it all. It was pretty interesting to think about back then, but seems pretty tame by today's levels.
ngl i had to replay the middle parts a few times to understand
The universe could be perceived as infinite, due to misconception, while being a simulated construct of finite dimensions. That’s is to say unknown boundaries could be mistaken as an infinite measure.
You missed a detail that is specifically neurological, our brains actually make a prediction of what info is in physical stimulus prior to receiving it then projects that and makes micro changes when it finally receives the stimulus. Do more research. Your spreading a misconception about how our brains work.
Yep I'm going to stop eating shrooms because this video really put my already alternative state of consciousness into a very scary and overwhelming place. Please keep up the good work!
This starting talking about rules and I had expected him to cover Rule34
Aren't we glad he wasn't trying to cause an existential crisis??
That was close 🙄
30 seconds into upload and im here
I think the 360° takes away from the video more than it adds. Edit: besides the plant view, that was a pretty dope part.
I'd like to throw a thought here or there, the thing about the tree with infinite branches I thought; but without the tree there won't be any infinite branches. The infinite branches needed the tree to be infinite, which I think that puts the infinity of the branches under questioning, are they really infinite? So that's a thought. Another thing about the clones, which is simple I think. Can we consider twins clones of each other? Since they look the same and sometimes think the same as well? Are they in a constant identity theft of each other ? lol.
underrated comment
Maybe it's more like if we made a simulation, we could reduce the power consumption by using superposition and only really 'process' stuff that people are able to observe. Kinda like Schroedingers cat.The rest of the universe is just idling in the background and doesn't exist visually unless we try to send out probes and such, but with a human you'd need to simulate the feel and taste etc. What happens when theres so many people that we're observing everything (or most things), I'm not sure what will happen, I imagine a cap of sorts might have to be involved to stop it crashing but I've also no idea what I'm talking about lol
Whoa! I accidentally touched the screen and something I didn't expect happened to my delight. Awesome.
Sounds like the cardinal system in SAO: a seed of basics rules generating the whole universe.
If our 'reality' is a simulation, then it begs the question: What is being simulated? From my experience so far, it makes more sense to conceptualize our 'reality' as being like some sort of MMORPG or open--world game. To be clear, I'm not saying that our 'reality' *IS* a simulation, game or whatever; merely that we could reasonably describe it in such terms as a means to better understand actuality.
With that in mind, consider this: Your mind has accidentally become embedded within this 'game' and you've forgotten who you are in actuality. You've learned to identify yourself with this in-game character - your meatspace vehicle, i.e. your physical body - but the actuality of what 'you' are is that vast, expansive and bright awareness of your immediate experience. When you re-cognize that which is moving these bodies through the game-world, you can learn how to take control of it. That's when things get *really* interesting...
GTA has got absolutely *NOTHING* on the wild ride of Samsara once you actually know what it's about!
Sounds like the seed in SAO
Love the philosophical ideas explored here. Keep up this amazing work. Love from NZ
this is the type of video to get 26 million views in like 9 years or so.
And i'll be the first reply of the top comment in 9 years. Investments baby. Investments.
@@Miguel_Johnson and ill be the second reply
I've never seen a video like this in my whole life!! to say it freaked me out just a little bit is an understatement...
Pro tip: This video is in 360
This has a high pitch noice that was making my ears hurt alot
I was spinning the camera during some of those transitions and damn did it look trippy lmao specially 1:32
This is definitely not the video I should be watching while trying to go to sleep but I’m here for it
I'm lying in bed, watching on my phone, so I can't really experience this video properly. It's trying to stay upright, while I'm horizontal.
There should be an option to watch this in a standard format, instead of this bullshit.
I kind of disagree with the point that a simulated universe simulating other universes would require infinite computational power, because the power in the original simulated universe would itself be simulated, it wouldn't be coming from our universe. So my thinking is that the power for each simulated universe would come only from the universe that simulated it! Thought-provoking video :)
The cellular automata phenomenon is essentially chaos theory.
An infinite loop paradox may seem implausible under the premise of a finite availability of computational memory, but what if each subsequent simulation of "ultimate reality" was a more deconstructed version of the simulation before it? Thus, each subsequent simulation of ultimate reality would actually require less memory than the previous, whereby the total memory available is astronomically large but still finite.
Ultimate reality would essentially be the host of the first simulation, and every simulation built within the first would be a fractional partition of the whole. All simulations would be uniquely complex in their own right but less refined than their predecessors, until a mathematical singularity is reached. This wouldn't answer how ultimate reality exists in the first place, but perhaps how a seemingly infinite number of simulations within ultimate reality could exist.
Don't incinerate the clone as you may actually be the clone.
DAMN that closing track is GOOOD
"Are there dumb computations?" *shows deer LOL
"Are there smart computations?" *shows wolf
“Hello, I am a humanoid cellular cooperative biological colony collectively known as Sam”
You need a smallish black hole to allow for a computational holographic simulation of a universe. You can see the mathematics behind this on pbs spacetime.
It's like a ton of cells fighting because they either fight over who created it or ownership of even the happiness they seem pleasing to a creator. Even looking at the discovery of the boson. Did scientist even think that the boson the foundational building piece of energy would be smarter than the beings that found it?
Light leaves the sun and arrives 8 minutes later... Not entirely correct, except in context. From the context of the light, which is how you presented it, it arrives instantly, as photons do not experience time. From our perspective, it takes 8 minutes. Mind blown.
Dude I love your editing and quality of all of your videos.
Wait was that Brendaniel in the MCProHosting ad?
Why don't we just agree that, There is a God, who owns and controls everything. Who he does what he wishes. May Allah give everybody Hidayah
This video feels like I took both pills in the matrix
This is trippy, very cool
Complex properties emerge from the collective interractions of simple elements given enough time. That's basically how everything came to be from the Big Bang onward.
the issue with the endless simulation loop seems solvable
Wow. Imagine crating a 2d video and just adding a background so you can make it 360.
I have literally always wondered if relativity and other basic physics would change in a different universe with different building blocks somehow. This is so cool that he was able to not only think of a way to make this work but actually carry it out.
The resolution of each child reality is going to be lower than the parent reality. We perceive the world through symbols, so this doesn’t break our immersion until we start trying stuff like quantum mechanics.
This is what that show DEVS was all about.
Clone identity theft wouldn't be a problem. The fingerprints would not be identical.
from someone studying meteorology: due to the butterfly effect and other similar phenomena, even if we could predict the motion and placement of every single atom in the atmosphere, we still wouldn't be able to predict the weather with 100% accuracy.
basically, don't yell at the weather man on tv for being wrong ahaha
Loved the 3D looking around during this video
It felt amazingly personal
You have a good voice and are so well spoken. I love your topics. Thank you for sharing your gifts with us.
You are one of my favorite youtubers
It wouldn’t require infinite processing power to simulate a recursive simulation. It would just use diminishing returns or diminishing processing or exponential decay. And it may not require a loss in rendering or quality either. You could just have everything reduce to a simulation early enough and have the programmed link to a finite amount of focus such that each simulation is less than double and occurs at the halfway point of the universe or earlier.
Or you could make time non linear so that each simulation actually takes longer time but occurs with different rules of perception so it’s perceived as the same. You could also distort the time of the higher reality such that no additional processing occurs until the simulation is completed or like inception where an hour outside of the simulation feels like multiple lifetimes.
In fact, the eventual goal of simulation is probably to avoid our inability to reverse entropy. So it stands to reason that we would design a way to preserve eternity in a finite moment of time.
yknow sometimes i get that weird feeling and then start to think that we're in some vr game-- we dont feel human or real
You are real, trust me on that one.